Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Aug 14;20(8):e0329634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329634

Enhancement of antiphotoaging properties of Cannabis sativa stem water extracts by fermentation with Lacticaseibacillus casei

Jin-Woo Kim 1,2,#, Huitae Min 2,#, Jisu Park 2,3, Seongsu Na 2,3, Taejung Kim 2,4, Pahn-Shick Chang 1, Young-Tae Park 2,4,*, Jin-Chul Kim 2,4,*, Jungyeob Ham 2,4,5,*
Editor: Taher Hatahet6
PMCID: PMC12352839  PMID: 40811694

Abstract

Skin photoaging, driven primarily by UVB radiation, leads to collagen degradation and oxidative stress, contributing to the visible signs of aging, such as wrinkles and loss of skin elasticity. This process is mediated by the upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1), which is triggered by reactive oxygen species, and the activation of photoaging-related signaling pathways, including ERK, JNK, and p65. In the present study, we evaluated the antiphotoaging potential of fermented and non-fermented Cannabis sativa stem water extracts, focusing on their ability to suppress MMP-1 expression and reduce oxidative stress in UVB-irradiated human dermal fibroblasts. Unlike previous studies that have primarily focused on leaves or flowers, our study highlights the stems of C. sativa as a novel and underutilized source of bioactive compounds for skin protection. Using Lacticaseibacillus casei for fermentation, we observed enhanced bioactivity in the fermented extracts, particularly in terms of a 6.6% greater inhibition of MMP-1 expression and 68.3% increased flavonoid content, compared to the non-fermented extracts. Fermented water extract demonstrated the most potent suppression of UVB-induced signaling pathways and collagen breakdown. Our findings suggest that fermentation enhances the antiphotoaging properties of C. sativa stems, offering a promising potential for natural, plant-based skin care solutions aimed at preventing UVB-induced skin aging.

Introduction

The growing awareness of skincare and the increasing demand for natural and effective anti-aging solutions have spurred interest in plant-derived bioactive compounds [1–3]. Traditional synthetic agents used in skincare often raise concerns about their safety and potential side effects, which has led to a shift towards natural compounds that offer antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and skin-protective benefits. Antioxidants are of significant interest because of their ability to neutralize reactive oxygen species (ROS), reduce oxidative stress, and inhibit the activation of photoaging-related pathways. These properties make them effective in preventing collagen degradation and combating the visible signs of skin aging. Among the extrinsic factors that contribute to skin aging, chronic exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation, specifically UVB, is the primary cause of photoaging [4,5]. UVB exposure induces the production of ROS, which activate signaling pathways involving mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor-kappa B (p65). These pathways lead to the upregulation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), particularly MMP-1, which is responsible for collagen degradation in the dermis. Collagen breakdown results in wrinkles, the loss of skin elasticity, and other hallmarks of aging. Therefore, targeting ROS and MMP activity has become a central focus in the development of antiphotoaging therapies.

Cannabis sativa has gained attention because of its diverse range of bioactive compounds, particularly its leaves and flowers, which are rich in cannabinoids such as cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). [6–8]. These parts have been extensively studied for their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective properties in various biomedical applications. However, the stems of C. sativa have been largely overlooked, despite containing significant levels of polyphenols and flavonoids, which are known to exhibit strong antioxidant and anti-aging effects. Previous studies have primarily focused on the cannabinoid-driven bioactivity of leaves and flowers, whereas our study explores the non-cannabinoid bioactive potential of C. sativa stems. Given that polyphenols and flavonoids are key regulators of oxidative stress and collagen degradation, we hypothesized that C. sativa stems could serve as a valuable source for developing natural antiphotoaging agents. Furthermore, this is the first study to evaluate the impact of fermentation on enhancing the bioactivity of C. sativa stems, particularly in the context of UVB-induced photoaging. Our results demonstrate that fermentation with Lacticaseibacillus casei significantly increases the flavonoid content, leading to enhanced MMP-1 inhibition and antioxidant activity, thus establishing a novel approach for utilizing C. sativa stems in skincare applications.

Fermentation has emerged as a powerful technique to enhance the bioactivity of plant-derived compounds [9]. Through the metabolic actions of microorganisms, fermentation increases the bioavailability of beneficial compounds, breaks down complex molecules into more potent forms, and produces new bioactive metabolites. Among the various microorganisms used for fermentation, Lacticaseibacillus casei (previously known as Lactobacillus casei) is a well-studied probiotic strain with a proven ability to enhance the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of plant materials [10,11]. Fermentation with L. casei increases the content of flavonoids and polyphenols, two critical compounds known for their antioxidant and antiphotoaging properties. L. casei releases glycosidases that break down glycosylated compounds into more bioavailable aglycones, making them more effective at neutralizing ROS and inhibiting the pathways responsible for photoaging. Previous studies have demonstrated that fermented plant extracts exhibit stronger antioxidant activities and better anti-inflammatory effects than non-fermented extracts, supporting the use of L. casei [6,12].

Despite increasing interest in natural compounds for skincare, the potential of C. sativa stems remains underexplored, particularly in the context of UVB-induced photoaging [13]. Although the leaves and flowers of C. sativa are well known for their cannabinoid content and associated health benefits, the bioactivity of their stems has largely been overlooked [14]. Studies focusing on C. sativa stems, specifically their polyphenol and flavonoid contents, are limited, leaving a gap in the understanding of their potential role in skincare and anti-aging applications. Additionally, previous studies have shown that fermentation can increase the antioxidant potential of plant materials [10,15]. However, there is a lack of studies specifically examining the impact of fermentation on C. sativa stem extracts, particularly regarding their ability to modulate key markers of photoaging, such as ROS production, MMP-1 expression, and the activation of photoaging-related signaling proteins. This gap presents an opportunity to explore the use of fermented C. sativa stems as a novel and natural solution for combating UVB-induced skin damage. Addressing this gap could lead to the development of more effective plant-based skincare products that harness the enhanced bioactivity of fermented extracts.

Recent studies have demonstrated that fermentation with Lacticaseibacillus spp. can significantly enhance the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of various plant materials, including oats, whey, and herbal extracts, through the release of phenolic aglycones and organic acids [16–18]. However, to date, no study has investigated this approach using Cannabis sativa stems. This makes our work the first to examine how fermentation with L. casei can augment the antiphotoaging activity of stem-derived extracts in a UVB-induced skin aging model.

This study addresses a significant gap in current research by investigating the underexplored potential of C. sativa stems and their bioactivity in the context of skin aging. This study aimed to introduce a novel approach to enhance the antioxidant and antiphotoaging properties of plant-derived extracts by focusing on the fermentation of C. sativa stems with L. casei. Given the increasing demand for natural and effective skincare solutions, particularly those that protect against photoaging, the findings of this study have important implications for the development of new plant-based skincare products. Moreover, the findings of this study contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of how fermentation can be used to enhance the bioactivity of plant-derived materials, thereby increasing their efficacy in mitigating oxidative stress and collagen degradation. This study could pave the way for the use of fermented C. sativa extracts as valuable ingredients in skincare formulations designed to prevent or reduce the effects of UVB-induced skin aging.

Materials and methods

Reagents and chemicals

Gifu anaerobic medium (GAM) was purchased from Kisan Bio (Seoul, Korea). Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, gallic acid, quercetin, trolox, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS), and potassium persulfate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Aluminum (III) chloride was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (Tokyo, Japan). Sodium carbonate was purchased from Showa Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).

Preparation of C. sativa stem extracts

The C. sativa stems used in this study were obtained from the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation (Andong, Korea). The stems were first dried and finely ground into a powder. To prepare the water extract, 50 g of C. sativa stem powder was soaked in 1 L distilled water at room temperature for 72 h. The extraction process was repeated three times to maximize the yield of bioactive compounds. After the extraction process was completed, the water extracts were concentrated using a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure and subsequently freeze-dried to obtain the final powdered extracts.

Bacterial strain growth control and fermentation

L. casei was obtained from the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (Daejeon, Korea) and cultured in GAM broth at 37 °C, and maintained in culture following the manufacturer’s instructions. The C. sativa extracts were divided into four groups: 0 h (non-fermented C. sativa water extract), 48 h (fermented C. sativa water extract for 48 h), 72 h (fermented C. sativa water extract for 72 h), and 96 h (fermented C. sativa water extract for 96 h). L. casei culture only (LC Sup) and medium only (GAM) were used as controls. For fermentation, 50 mL of water extracts were combined with 1 mL of L. casei culture medium and incubated at 37 °C with continuous shaking at 200 rpm. Following fermentation, the samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C and the supernatants collected.

The mixtures were further concentrated using a rotary evaporator and the final fermented extracts were reconstituted in distilled water at a concentration of 10,000 μg/mL. Before use in subsequent experiments, the extracts were filtered through a 0.22 μm polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane to remove any remaining bacterial cells. The fermentation process was designed to enhance the bioactivity of C. sativa extracts by increasing the content of flavonoids and other bioactive compounds that are known for their antioxidant and antiphotoaging properties.

Cell culture and cytotoxicity determination

The Human dermal fibroblast (HDF) cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). All experiments involving human-derived cell lines complied with institutional ethical guidelines and were conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki. As HDFs used in this study were commercially available and obtained from a certified provider, specific ethical approval was not required. HDFs were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin–streptomycin at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Once the cells reached 80–90% confluence, they were detached by incubation with trypsin/EDTA. Cells (2 × 104) were seeded in a 96-well plate and incubated overnight at 37 °C and 5% CO2. After removing the medium from each well, the cells were treated with 100 μL of DMEM containing the extracts (0–1000 μg/mL) or control media (LC sup or GAM) and incubated for 24 h without UVB irradiation to assess cytotoxicity. The medium was removed from each well and 100 μL of DMEM containing MTT solution (500 μg/mL) was added and incubated for 1 h. The medium was removed from each well and 100 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide was added to dissolve the formazan crystals. The absorbance was measured at 560 nm using an Infinite M1000 microplate reader (TECAN Ltd., Männedorf, Switzerland).

MMP-1 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

ELISA was performed to confirm downregulation of MMP-1 expression in the UVB-irradiated HDFs. HDFs (4.5 × 105) were seeded into 6-well plates and cultivated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 24 h. After incubation, the medium was replaced with DMEM containing 1000 μg/mL CW, CE, FCS, FCE, or LC. The other cells were treated with DMEM containing 250 μg/mL ascorbic acid as a positive control. The cells were then incubated for 1 h, irradiated with UVB (25 mJ/cm2) light and cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 24 h. The supernatant was collected and MMP-1 expression was measured using the MMP-1 DuoSet ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Western blot analysis

HDFs (4.5 × 105) were seeded into 6-well plates and cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 24 h. After incubation, the medium was replaced with DMEM containing LC, FCS, or FCE (1000 μg/mL), or ascorbic acid (250 μg/mL) and incubated for 1 h. After incubation, the cells were exposed to 25 mJ/cm2 UVB light and cultured for 24 h. Next, 80 μL of PRO-PREPTM extraction buffer (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seoul, Korea) was added, and the extracts were prepared. The protein lysates were quantified using bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich) as a standard using a DCTM Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Equivalent amounts (20 μg) of protein were separated by electrophoresis on a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a PVDF membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk dissolved in Tris-buffered saline containing Tween-20 (TBST) for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was incubated with the primary antibody diluted in 5% BSA in TBST at 4 °C overnight. The secondary antibody was diluted with 5% BSA in TBST and incubated with the membrane at room temperature for 1 h. Membranes were thoroughly washed with TBST and developed using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Advansta, San Jose, CA, USA). The expression of each protein was measured using an iBright CL1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cleveland, OH, USA). The antibodies used for western blot analysis are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

ABTS and DPPH ROS scavenging assay

The antioxidant activities of the samples were measured using the ABTS and DPPH scavenging assays. Trolox was used as the standard. Each sample was diluted with 70% ethanol to a final concentration of 10,000 μg/mL. The ABTS radical-scavenging assay was performed as previously described, with minor modification [19]. The ABTS stock solution (7 mM) was mixed with 2.45 mM potassium persulfate and incubated for 14 h at room temperature in the dark. The ABTS stock solution was diluted in ethanol to an absorbance of 0.45 (±0.02) at 734 nm, and 0.9 mL of the diluted ABTS solution was mixed with 0.03 mL of sample and incubated at room temperature for 10 min in the dark. The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 734 nm using a microplate reader. The DPPH radical-scavenging assay was conducted as previously described, with some modifications [20]. Briefly, 150 µL of 0.1 mM DPPH diluted in ethanol was mixed with 50 µL of each sample in a 96-well microplate. DPPH sample mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 30 min in the dark. The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 517 nm using a microplate reader. ABTS and DPPH radical-scavenging activities (%) were calculated using the following equation:

Radical−scavenging activity (%) = {(Acontrol−Asample)/Acontrol} × 100\]

Where AControl is the absorbance of Trolox and ASample is the absorbance of the samples.

Total polyphenol and flavonoid assay

The total polyphenol content of the samples was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method [21]. Gallic acid (GA) was used to generate a standard curve. The test sample (0.2 mL, diluted in 70% ethanol) was mixed with 0.2 mL Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and 0.6 mL water. After 5 min, 1 mL of an 8% sodium carbonate water solution and 1 mL of distilled water were added. The reaction was performed at room temperature in the dark for 30 min. After centrifugation, absorbance was measured at 765 nm using a microplate reader. The total polyphenol content was expressed as mg GA equivalents (GAE)/g of sample (mg GAE/5–10 g of sample).

The total flavonoid content was confirmed using the aluminum chloride colorimetric method [22]. Quercetin was used to prepare a standard calibration curve. All test samples were diluted in 70% ethanol and mixed with an equal volume of 2% aluminum chloride. After 60 min at room temperature, absorbance was measured at 420 nm using a microplate reader. The total flavonoid content was expressed as mg of quercetin equivalents (QE)/g of sample (mg QE/5–10 g of sample).

Measurement of intracellular ROS

Intracellular ROS levels were measured using 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA, Sigma-Aldrich), a cell-permeable fluorogenic probe that is deacetylated by intracellular esterases and oxidized by ROS to fluorescent dichlorofluorescein (DCF). HDFs (2 × 10⁴ cells/well) were seeded in black 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h. Cells were then treated with 25 mJ/cm² of UVB and incubated for 1 h in serum-free DMEM. After UVB exposure, the cells were treated with 100 μg/mL of the indicated extracts (0 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, LC sup, and GAM) for 24 h. DCFH-DA (10 μM final concentration) was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min in the dark. After washing twice with PBS, fluorescence was measured using a microplate reader (Ex: 485 nm, Em: 535 nm). The ROS levels were normalized to those in the UVB-only group and expressed as relative percentages.

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of flavonoids

To quantify quercetin and kaempferol in fermented and non-fermented Cannabis sativa stem extracts, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis was performed using a Shimadzu Prominence HPLC system equipped with a photodiode array (PDA) detector. Lyophilized extract powders (100 mg) were dissolved in 10 mL of 70% methanol, vortexed, and sonicated for 30 min. The solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm syringe filter prior to injection. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a C18 reversed-phase column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size, Waters) at 30 °C. The mobile phase consisted of solvent A (0.1% formic acid in water) and solvent B (acetonitrile), with the following gradient elution profile: 0–5 min, 15% B; 5–20 min, 15–40% B; 20–25 min, 40–70% B; 25–30 min, 70% B. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, and the injection volume was 20 μL. Detection was performed at 370 nm. Standard curves were generated using authentic standards of quercetin and kaempferol (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥ 98% purity), and the results were expressed as µg per gram of extract (µg/g). All measurements were conducted in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS (version 24.0; SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). Differences between multiple groups were analyzed using one-tailed analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. All experiments were independently conducted in triplicate. Values for each experiment represent the mean of three measurements and are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of three values.

Results

Establishment of UVB-induced photoaging cell model

In this study, we established a UVB-induced photoaging cell model to evaluate the antiphotoaging effects of Cannabis sativa extracts, as described in the Materials and method section. The model was based on HDF cells, a human fibroblast cell line derived from the dermis, which is commonly used for studying UVB-induced skin damage. The cells were cultured under standard conditions (37°C, 5% CO₂), and UVB irradiation was applied when the cells reached 80–90% confluence. The UVB exposure levels ranged from 25 to 70 mJ/cm2, which mimics real-life UVB exposure that contributes to skin aging. After UVB irradiation, the cells were incubated for 24 hours to allow the induction of photoaging responses. By establishing this model, we aimed at identifying and validating natural compounds that can prevent or reduce the effects of photoaging.

Preparation of C. sativa stem extract and its fermentation by L. casei

The Cannabis sativa stem was chosen for this study due to its potential as an underutilized resource with bioactive properties. While the leaves and flowers of C. sativa are rich in cannabinoids and flavonoids and have been widely studied for their therapeutic benefits, the stems are primarily used in industrial applications such as textiles and are often overlooked for medicinal purposes. The primary focus of this research was on the antiphotoaging effects of C. sativa stem extracts. As described in the Materials and methods section, the C. sativa stem extracts were prepared using water as solvents.

Assessment of cytotoxicity of the fermented and non-fermented extracts

To determine the cytotoxicity of the extracts towards HDFs, an MTT assay was performed (Fig 1). None of the samples, including 0 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, LC sup, and GAM, showed cytotoxicity at the maximum concentration of 1000 μg/mL, maintaining cell viability above 90%. Only the ascorbic acid (AS) control group showed a decrease in viability. Exposure to UVB light resulted in cytotoxicity at a dose of 40 mJ/cm2 or higher (S1 Fig). Therefore, all tested C. sativa stem extracts and fermentation-related controls were considered non-toxic and safe for further investigation of their potential antiphotoaging properties.

Fig 1. Cytotoxicity of Cannabis sativa stem extracts and their fermented products.

Fig 1

The viability of human dermal fibroblasts was evaluated using an MTT assay. Cells were treated with the indicated various concentrations of the extracts for 24 h, including ascorbic acid, Gifu Anaerobic Medium (GAM), and non-fermented extract (0 h), fermented extracts (48 h and 72 h), and L. casei culture supernatant (LC sup). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3 per group).

Changes in the expression of photoaging-related signaling proteins

UVB irradiation activates several signaling pathways involved in photoaging, primarily through ROS production, which in turn triggers the phosphorylation of key proteins such as ERK, JNK, and p65 [23,24]. These proteins play essential roles in promoting inflammation, oxidative stress, and the degradation of collagen, all of which contribute to skin aging. In particular, the activation of ERK and JNK pathways leads to increased MMP-1 expression, which accelerates collagen breakdown in the dermis. We evaluated the effects of both fermented and non-fermented C. sativa extracts on the phosphorylation of ERK, JNK, and p65 in UVB-irradiated HDFs using western blot analysis (Fig 2). UVB exposure markedly increased the phosphorylation levels of ERK, JNK, and p65 compared to non-irradiated controls. Among the treatments, the 72 h fermented extract showed the most prominent inhibitory effects on ERK and p65 phosphorylation, while JNK phosphorylation was most strongly reduced by the 96 h extract, although 48 h and 72 h extracts also showed comparable inhibitory activity. LC sup also exhibited a mild reduction in phosphorylation across all three proteins, suggesting a partial contribution of microbial metabolites. These results indicate that fermented C. sativa extracts, particularly those fermented for 72 h, effectively suppress UVB-induced activation of major pro-photoaging signaling pathways, supporting their potential antiphotoaging efficacy.

Fig 2. Effect of the fermented Cannabis sativa stem extracts on UVB-induced activation of the signal proteins in human dermal fibroblasts evaluated by western blot analysis.

Fig 2

(A) Representative western blots (n = 1 per lane) for p-ERK, ERK, p-JNK, JNK, p-p65, p65, and GAPDH. (B–D) Western blot densitometry results for (B) p-ERK, (C) p-JNK, and (D) p-p65. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3 per group). #p < 0.05 and ###p < 0.001 compared with CON, ***p < 0.001 and *p < 0.05 compared with UVB. †p < 0.05, ††p < 0.01 and ††† < 0.001 compared with the non-fermented extract (0 h). Except for the control group, all other groups were exposed to UVB (25 mJ/cm2).

Effect of the fermented extracts on MMP-1 expression

The effects of the extracts on MMP-1 expression were evaluated in UVB-irradiated HDFs using ELISA (Fig 3). As expected, UVB exposure at 25 mJ/cm² significantly elevated MMP-1 levels compared to the non-irradiated control group. AS group exhibited the strongest inhibitory effect on MMP-1 expression, confirming the validity of the assay and the relevance of MMP-1 as a photoaging marker. Among the treatment groups, all fermented extracts (48 h, 72 h, and 96 h) significantly suppressed MMP-1 expression, showing comparable efficacy. These effects were substantially greater than that of the non-fermented extract (0 h), indicating that fermentation enhanced the anti-photoaging properties of C. sativa stems. Interestingly, the LC sup group also led to a statistically significant decrease in MMP-1 levels, suggesting that microbial metabolites may contribute to the observed biological effects. The GAM control did not produce any noticeable change. These findings suggest that fermentation of Cannabis sativa stem extracts with L. casei enhances their antiphotoaging efficacy, and that both plant-derived and microbial metabolites may contribute synergistically via their fermentation to the protection against UVB-induced skin damage.

Fig 3. Fermented C. sativa stem extracts attenuate MMP-1 expression induced by UVB irradiation.

Fig 3

(A) Photograph of human dermal fibroblasts and (B) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for MMP-1 expression. All groups except the control were exposed to UVB light (25 mJ/cm2). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3 per group). ###p < 0.001 compared with CON, ***p < 0.001 and **p < 0.01 compared with UVB. ††p < 0.01 and ††† < 0.001 compared with the non-fermented extract (0 h).

Enhanced antioxidant activity and intracellular ROS suppression by the fermented C. sativa stem extracts

ROS generation plays a central role in triggering photoaging through the activation of the MAPK and p65 pathways [25]. To assess the antioxidant effects of the samples and their potential to mitigate this process, ABTS and DPPH radical scavenging activities, total polyphenol content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and intracellular ROS levels were measured with GAM, 0 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, and LC Sup (Table 1). Fermentation markedly enhanced the antioxidant activity of the extracts. The 72 h sample showed the highest ABTS (63.5 ± 2.4%) and DPPH (52.8 ± 2.1%) radical scavenging activities, followed closely by the 96 h and 48 h extracts. In contrast, the non-fermented extract (0 h) exhibited significantly lower activity (ABTS: 38.4 ± 2.7%, DPPH: 31.2 ± 2.5%), while the GAM and LC Sup controls showed minimal activity (<33%).

Table 1. Antioxidant activities, polyphenol and flavonoid contents, and intracellular ROS levels.

GAM 0 h 48 h 72 h 96 h LC Sup
ABTS ROS
scavenging activity (%)
6.3 ± 0.8 38.4 ± 2.7 56.1 ± 2.0* 63.5 ± 2.4** 61.3 ± 1.9** 32.7 ± 2.0
DPPH ROS
scavenging activity (%)
5.1 ± 0.6 31.2 ± 2.5 48.5 ± 2.6* 52.8 ± 2.1** 50.2 ± 2.3** 28.3 ± 1.9
TPC (mg GAE 3 /g) 0.9 ± 0.4 187.8 ± 5.2 158.2 ± 4.8 153.7 ± 5.1 151.5 ± 4.9 12.5 ± 1.2
TFC (mg QE 4 /g) 1.1 ± 0.2 204.8 ± 7.0 292.5 ± 5.9* 387.3 ± 6.9*** 365.9 ± 6.5** 5.3 ± 1.8
Relative ROS level
(% of UVB)
97.8 ± 2.3 88.7 ± 2.1 67.1 ± 2.5* 59.8 ± 2.0** 61.5 ± 2.4** 72.6 ± 3.1

Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared to the 0 h group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

Interestingly, TPC decreased slightly after fermentation compared to 0 h (187.8 ± 5.2 mg GAE/g), but remained substantial in all fermented samples (e.g., 153.7 ± 5.1 mg GAE/g at 72 h), suggesting partial polyphenol transformation rather than depletion. This transformation in polyphenol content may be due to the metabolism of certain polyphenolic compounds by L. casei during fermentation, as supported by previous studies, which demonstrated that some polyphenols are hydrolyzed by microflora [26,27]. In contrast, TFC significantly increased with fermentation, peaking at 72 h (387.3 ± 6.9 mg QE/g), representing an approximately 1.9-fold increase over 0 h. To further investigate the effect of fermentation on flavonoid composition, we quantified the levels of two key aglycone flavonoids, quercetin and kaempferol, using HPLC analysis (S3 Fig). In the non-fermented extract (0 h), quercetin and kaempferol were detected at 3.2 ± 0.4 µg/g and 2.1 ± 0.3 µg/g extract, respectively. These levels increased progressively with fermentation time, reaching peak values at 72 h (quercetin: 11.3 ± 0.7 µg/g; kaempferol: 9.0 ± 0.5 µg/g), representing approximately 3.5-fold and 4.3-fold increases, respectively. A slight decline was observed at 96 h, though levels remained elevated compared to 0 h. As expected, no detectable levels of either flavonoid were found in GAM or LC Sup, confirming that the observed flavonoids were plant-derived and not microbial byproducts. These results suggest that fermentation with L. casei enhances the release or transformation of flavonoid aglycones in C. sativa stem extracts, possibly via enzymatic hydrolysis of glycosylated precursors.

Intracellular ROS levels, measured by DCFH-DA assay in UVB-irradiated HDFs, were significantly reduced by all fermented extracts. The 72 h sample again demonstrated the strongest effect, lowering ROS to 59.8 ± 2.0% of the UVB-only group, compared to 88.7 ± 2.1% in the 0 h group. LC sup also showed a moderate ROS-suppressive effect (72.6 ± 3.1%), while GAM had no significant impact.

These results suggest that fermentation with L. casei enhances the antioxidant potential of C. sativa stem extracts by increasing flavonoid content and improving intracellular ROS suppression, with optimal effects observed at 72 h.

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the antiphotoaging effects of fermented and non-fermented C. sativa stem water extracts in UVB-irradiated human dermal fibroblasts. Fermentation with L. casei significantly enhanced the biological activity of the extracts, as evidenced by increased flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity. The fermented samples, particularly the 72 h extract, markedly suppressed MMP-1 expression compared to the non-fermented control (0 h), thereby mitigating collagen degradation (Fig 3). Additionally, intracellular ROS levels were significantly reduced, which aligned with the elevated ABTS and DPPH scavenging activities and HPLC-quantified increases in quercetin and kaempferol (Table 1, S3 Fig). Furthermore, the fermented extracts downregulated the UVB-induced phosphorylation of ERK, JNK, and p65, which are key mediators of inflammation and matrix degradation in photoaging (Fig 2). These findings suggest that microbial fermentation enhances the bioavailability and efficacy of C. sativa stem extracts, supporting their potential as safe and effective natural antiphotoaging agents.

These findings are consistent with those of previous studies on the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of C. sativa [14,28]. However, this study uniquely emphasizes the potential of C. sativa stems, particularly when fermented. Incorporating C. sativa leaves and flowers as comparative baselines was considered; however, experimental use of these plant parts requires additional regulatory approvals due to their higher cannabinoid content. Many jurisdictions impose restrictions on handling and researching cannabinoid-rich materials, necessitating specific permits for experimental use. Since this study aimed to evaluate whether fermentation enhances the bioactivity of stems independent of cannabinoids, we prioritized a more accessible and regulatory-compliant approach. While most previous studies have focused on the leaves and flowers, this study shows that fermentation enhances the bioactivity of stems, especially by reducing MMP-1 expression and mitigating UVB-induced photoaging. Fermentation is known to improve the bioavailability of plant compounds, and in this study, fermentation significantly enhanced the suppression of the ERK, JNK, and p65 pathways, which are key regulators of photoaging. Compared to non-fermented extracts, fermented extracts showed superior efficacy in reducing collagen degradation, offering new insights into the potential use of fermented C. sativa in natural skincare products.

The fermented samples treatment effectively inhibited phosphorylation of ERK, JNK, and p65, leading to reduced MMP-1 expression and collagen degradation. Fermentation plays a crucial role in enhancing their bioactivity by increasing its flavonoid content, which, in turn, enhances its antioxidant properties (Table 1). These antioxidants neutralize ROS, reducing oxidative stress, and preventing ERK, JNK, and p65 activation. By simultaneously lowering ROS levels and directly inhibiting molecular pathways associated with photoaging, they provide a comprehensive mechanism to protect against UVB-induced skin damage, making it a highly promising natural agent for anti-aging applications, with fermentation significantly enhancing its therapeutic potential.

Although our study demonstrated significant antiphotoaging effects of fermented C. sativa stem extracts in UVB-irradiated HDFs, further validation in in vivo models is required to confirm these findings under physiologically relevant conditions. Murine photoaging models, particularly hairless mice (HR-1) or SKH-1 mice, which have been widely used to study UV-induced skin damage, would be appropriate for evaluating the protective effects of fermented extracts against photoaging. These models enable the assessment of collagen degradation, epidermal thickness, and oxidative stress markers in response to chronic UV exposure. Future studies will focus on evaluating the efficacy of fermented C. sativa extracts in these preclinical in vivo models to establish their potential for topical skin care applications

Our study primarily focused on UVB-induced photoaging; however, UVA radiation and environmental pollutants are also significant contributors to skin aging through oxidative stress and chronic inflammation. Unlike UVB, which mainly affects the epidermis, UVA penetrates deeper into the dermis, leading to collagen degradation and elastin fiber breakdown via ROS generation [29]. Moreover, environmental stressors such as airborne pollutants, particulate matter (PM2.5), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are known to induce oxidative stress, contributing to premature skin aging and inflammatory responses [30,31]. Given that fermented C. sativa stem extracts exhibit potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, they may also provide protective effects against UVA-induced photoaging and pollution-related skin damage. Future studies will explore the efficacy of these extracts in mitigating UVA-induced oxidative stress and pollutant-triggered skin inflammation in both in vitro and in vivo models to broaden their potential applications in skin protection.

Although we performed targeted HPLC analysis to quantify specific flavonoids such as quercetin and kaempferol, we acknowledge that this does not fully capture the complexity of fermentation-derived bioactive changes. To more comprehensively elucidate the mechanism underlying the enhanced bioactivity, future studies will incorporate untargeted metabolomic analyses, such as LC-MS, to identify and characterize additional metabolites produced during fermentation that may contribute to the observed antioxidant and antiphotoaging effects. Although more research is required to fully elucidate the mechanisms and broaden its applications, the fermented samples shows great promise as a natural agent for combating UVB-induced skin aging and could play a key role in the development of effective plant-based anti-aging solutions.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the fermentation of C. sativa stem water extracts with L. casei enhanced their antioxidant and antiphotoaging properties. The fermented water extracts showed significant potential for attenuating UVB-induced oxidative stress, suppressing MMP-1 expression, and inhibiting key signaling pathways involved in photoaging. These findings suggest that fermented C. sativa extracts are promising natural agents for preventing UVB-induced skin aging and promoting skin health.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Raw data for Fig 1 (MTT-based cell viability assay).

This dataset includes raw absorbance-derived cell viability percentages of human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) treated with various concentrations (0, 100, 250, 500, and 1000 μg/mL) of Cannabis sativa stem extracts, non-fermented (0 h) and fermented (48 h, 72 h, 96 h), as well as Lacticaseibacillus casei culture supernatant (LC Sup), Gifu Anaerobic Medium (GAM), and ascorbic acid. Viability was assessed by MTT assay after 24 h treatment without UVB exposure. Data are presented as individual replicate values (n = 3) and corresponding mean ± standard deviation for each condition.

(PDF)

pone.0329634.s001.pdf (186.1KB, pdf)
S2 Data. Raw data for Supplementary Fig 1 (MTT assay: UVB cytotoxicity).

This dataset presents the raw absorbance values of HDFs exposed to increasing doses of UVB light (0–70 mJ/cm²) for 24 hours.

(PDF)

pone.0329634.s002.pdf (107.8KB, pdf)
S3 Data. Raw data for Fig 3B (MMP-1 ELISA assay).

This dataset provides the calculated MMP-1 concentrations (ng/mL) in HDFs treated with non-fermented (0 h) and fermented C. sativa stem extracts (48 h, 72 h, 96 h), LC Sup, GAM, and ascorbic acid (positive control), following UVB irradiation at 25 mJ/cm². All treatment groups except the untreated control were UVB-irradiated. MMP-1 levels in culture supernatants were measured 24 hours after treatment. Each condition was tested in triplicate (n = 3), and data are reported as mean ± standard deviation in ng/mL.

(PDF)

pone.0329634.s003.pdf (126.8KB, pdf)
S4 Data. Raw data for Supplementary Fig 3 (Quantification of quercetin and kaempferol).

This dataset contains the quantified concentrations (µg/g extract) of quercetin and kaempferol in C. sativa stem extracts fermented for 0 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h. GAM medium and LC Sup were also analyzed. Quantification was performed by HPLC.

(PDF)

pone.0329634.s004.pdf (130.6KB, pdf)
S1 Table. Antibodies used for western blot analysis.

1, Phospho-SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) (G9) Mouse mAb; 2, SAPK/JNK Antibody; 3, Phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204) (D13.14.4E) XP® Rabbit mAb; 4, p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (137F5) Rabbit mAb; 5, Phospho-NF-κB p65 (Ser536) (93H1) Rabbit mAb; 6, NF-κB p65 (C22B4) Rabbit mAb; 7, GAPDH (14C10) Rabbit mAb; 8, mouse anti-rabbit IgG-HRP; 9, m-IgGκ BP-HRP.

(PDF)

pone.0329634.s005.pdf (109.8KB, pdf)
S1 Fig. Assessment of cytotoxicity of the exposure to UVB light.

The viability of human dermal fibroblasts was evaluated using an MTT assay. Cells were irradiated with UVB (0–70 mJ/cm2) for 24 h. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3 per group).

(PDF)

pone.0329634.s006.pdf (105.7KB, pdf)
S2 Fig. Western blot analysis of signaling pathways involved in UVB-induced photoaging.

HDFs were exposed to UVB (25 mJ/cm²) and treated with C. sativa stem water extracts (0 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h), LC Sup, or GAM for 24 h. Protein expression levels were assessed using antibodies against phosphorylated and total forms of ERK, JNK, and p65. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Representative blot images are shown for (A) p-ERK, (B) total ERK, (C) p-JNK, (D) total JNK, (E) p-p65, (F) p65, and (G) GAPDH. Molecular weights are indicated in kilodaltons (kDa).

(PDF)

pone.0329634.s007.pdf (220.5KB, pdf)
S3 Fig. Quantification of quercetin and kaempferol.

The concentrations of quercetin and kaempferol were determined in C. sativa stem extracts fermented for 0 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h, as well as in controls including GAM, LC Sup, and the non-fermented 0 h sample.

(PDF)

pone.0329634.s008.pdf (93.7KB, pdf)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was financially supported by the Technological Innovation R&D Program in the form of a grant (RS-2023-00281400) received by JH. This study was also financially support by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) via the Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS, Korea) in the form of an intramural grant (2Z07251) received by HM, JP, SN, and Y-TP. This study was also financially support by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) via the Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS, Korea) in the form of an intramural grant (2Z07256) received by HM, JP, SN, and Y-TP. This study was also financially supported by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) via the Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS, Korea) in the form of an intramural grant (2E33521) received by J-CK, TK, and J-WK. This study was also financially supported by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT, Korea) in the form of a grant (RS-2021-IN211379) received by TK and Y-TP. This study was also financially supported by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Republic of Korea, in the form of a grant (RS-2024-00332024) received by TK and Y-TP.

References

  • 1.Bjørklund G, Shanaida M, Lysiuk R, Butnariu M, Peana M, Sarac I, et al. Natural compounds and products from an anti-aging perspective. Molecules. 2022;27(20):7084. doi: 10.3390/molecules27207084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pizano-Andrade JC, Vargas-Guerrero B, Gurrola-Díaz CM, Vargas-Radillo JJ, Ruiz-López MA. Natural products and their mechanisms in potential photoprotection of the skin. J Biosci. 2022;47(4). doi: 10.1007/s12038-022-00314-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dwevedi D, Srivastava A. Molecular Mechanisms of Polyphenols in Management of Skin Aging. Curr Aging Sci. 2024;17(3):180–8. doi: 10.2174/0118746098287130240212085507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wei M, He X, Liu N, Deng H. Role of reactive oxygen species in ultraviolet-induced photodamage of the skin. Cell Div. 2024;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13008-024-00107-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim DJ, Iwasaki A, Chien AL, Kang S. UVB-mediated DNA damage induces matrix metalloproteinases to promote photoaging in an AhR- and SP1-dependent manner. JCI Insight. 2022;7(9):e156344. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.156344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gagné V, Merindol N, Boucher R, Boucher N, Desgagné-Penix I. Rooted in therapeutics: comprehensive analyses of Cannabis sativa root extracts reveals potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and bactericidal properties. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1465136. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1465136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zaiachuk M, Suryavanshi SV, Pryimak N, Kovalchuk I, Kovalchuk O. The Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Cannabis sativa Extracts on LPS-Induced Cytokines Release in Human Macrophages. Molecules. 2023;28(13):4991. doi: 10.3390/molecules28134991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ning K, Hou C, Wei X, Zhou Y, Zhang S, Chen Y, et al. Metabolomics Analysis Revealed the Characteristic Metabolites of Hemp Seeds Varieties and Metabolites Responsible for Antioxidant Properties. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:904163. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.904163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhao Y-S, Eweys AS, Zhang J-Y, Zhu Y, Bai J, Darwesh OM, et al. Fermentation Affects the Antioxidant Activity of Plant-Based Food Material through the Release and Production of Bioactive Components. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10(12):2004. doi: 10.3390/antiox10122004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Qian Z, Li Y, Hao Z, Zheng Z, Yang H, Li S, et al. Enhancement of the organic acid content and antioxidant capacity of yellow whey through fermentation with Lacticaseibacillus casei YQ336. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023;40(2):53. doi: 10.1007/s11274-023-03874-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cho H, Yang J, Kang JY, Kim KE. Inhibitory Effects of Fermented Sprouted Oat Extracts on Oxidative Stress and Melanin Overproduction. Antioxidants (Basel). 2024;13(5):544. doi: 10.3390/antiox13050544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhu H, Guo L, Yu D, Du X. New insights into immunomodulatory properties of lactic acid bacteria fermented herbal medicines. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1073922. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1073922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martinelli G, Magnavacca A, Fumagalli M, DellʼAgli M, Piazza S, Sangiovanni E. Cannabis sativa and Skin Health: Dissecting the Role of Phytocannabinoids. Planta Med. 2022;88(7):492–506. doi: 10.1055/a-1420-5780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Visković J, Zheljazkov VD, Sikora V, Noller J, Latković D, Ocamb CM, et al. Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Agronomy and Utilization: A Review. Agronomy. 2023;13(3):931. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13030931 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu S, Hu J, Zhong Y, Hu X, Yin J, Xiong T, et al. A review: Effects of microbial fermentation on the structure and bioactivity of polysaccharides in plant-based foods. Food Chem. 2024;440:137453. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gabriele M, Pucci L. Fermentation and germination as a way to improve cereals antioxidant and antiinflammatory properties. Current advances for development of functional foods modulating inflammation and oxidative stress. Elsevier. 2022. p. 477–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Qian Z, Li Y, Hao Z, Zheng Z, Yang H, Li S, et al. Enhancement of the organic acid content and antioxidant capacity of yellow whey through fermentation with Lacticaseibacillus casei YQ336. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023;40(2):53. doi: 10.1007/s11274-023-03874-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Seo MJ. Fermented Foods and Food Microorganisms: Antioxidant Benefits and Biotechnological Advancements. MDPI. 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hussen EM, Endalew SA. In vitro antioxidant and free-radical scavenging activities of polar leaf extracts of Vernonia amygdalina. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023;23(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12906-023-03923-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ramamurthy S, Thiagarajan K, Varghese S, Kumar R, Karthick BP, Varadarajan S, et al. Assessing the In Vitro Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory Activity of Moringa oleifera Crude Extract. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022;23(4):437–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dominguez-López I, Pérez M, Lamuela-Raventós RM. Total (poly)phenol analysis by the Folin-Ciocalteu assay as an anti-inflammatory biomarker in biological samples. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;64(27):10048–54. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2023.2220031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aparna B, Hema BP. Preliminary Screening and Quantification of Flavonoids in Selected Seeds of Apiaceae by UV-Visible Spectrophotometry with Evaluation Study on Different Aluminium Chloride Complexation Reaction. IJST. 2022;15(18):857–68. doi: 10.17485/ijst/v15i18.131 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Han SH, Ballinger E, Choung S-Y, Kwon JY. Anti-Photoaging Effect of Hydrolysates from Pacific Whiting Skin via MAPK/AP-1, NF-κB, TGF-β/Smad, and Nrf-2/HO-1 Signaling Pathway in UVB-Induced Human Dermal Fibroblasts. Mar Drugs. 2022;20(5):308. doi: 10.3390/md20050308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang L, Je J-G, Yang H-W, Jeon Y-J, Lee S. Dieckol, an Algae-Derived Phenolic Compound, Suppresses UVB-Induced Skin Damage in Human Dermal Fibroblasts and Its Underlying Mechanisms. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10(3):352. doi: 10.3390/antiox10030352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tanveer MA, Rashid H, Tasduq SA. Molecular basis of skin photoaging and therapeutic interventions by plant-derived natural product ingredients: A comprehensive review. Heliyon. 2023;9(3):e13580. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Filannino P, Bai Y, Di Cagno R, Gobbetti M, Gänzle MG. Metabolism of phenolic compounds by Lactobacillus spp. during fermentation of cherry juice and broccoli puree. Food Microbiol. 2015;46:272–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.08.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marín L, Miguélez EM, Villar CJ, Lombó F. Bioavailability of dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota metabolism: antimicrobial properties. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:905215. doi: 10.1155/2015/905215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hussain T, Jeena G, Pitakbut T, Vasilev N, Kayser O. Cannabis sativa research trends, challenges, and new-age perspectives. iScience. 2021;24(12):103391. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Brar G, Dhaliwal A, Brar AS, Sreedevi M, Ahmadi Y, Irfan M. A Comprehensive Review of the Role of UV Radiation in Photoaging Processes Between Different Types of Skin. Cureus. 2025;17(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sieradocha K. Air pollution and skin aging. Quality in Sport. 2024;31:55784. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Campisi M, Mastrangelo G, Mielżyńska-Švach D, Hoxha M, Bollati V, Baccarelli AA, et al. The effect of high polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure on biological aging indicators. Environ Health. 2023;22(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12940-023-00975-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Taher Hatahet

3 Jan 2025

Dear Dr. PARK,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 17 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Taher Hatahet, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.   

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Additional Editor Comments:

Please address the comments form reviewer one and two.

Regarding blot/gel data: PLOS ONE now requires that submissions reporting blots or gels include original, uncropped blot/gel image data as a supplement or in a public repository. This is in addition to complying with our image preparation guidelines described at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements. These requirements apply both to the main figures and to cropped blot/gel images included in Supporting Information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: Below is a structured review of the manuscript titled "Enhancement of antiphotoaging properties of Cannabis sativa stem extracts by fermentation with Lacticaseibacillus casei". Comments are categorized into major and minor points based on their criticality for improving the manuscript.

Major Comments

Abstract and Objectives Clarity:

The abstract concisely summarizes the study but lacks specific numerical data or comparative metrics to substantiate claims (e.g., "enhanced bioactivity"). Including key results such as specific percentage improvements in antioxidant activity or reductions in MMP-1 expression would strengthen the abstract.

The study's objectives in the Introduction section should explicitly mention the novelty of using Cannabis sativa stems, differentiating it from prior work focusing on other plant parts.

Experimental Design:

The choice of fermentation duration (72 hours) and conditions (e.g., shaking speed, temperature) for L. casei lacks justification. Why were these parameters chosen, and were any preliminary optimization experiments conducted?

Control comparisons: The inclusion of ascorbic acid as a positive control is appropriate, but the authors should also compare fermented and non-fermented extracts statistically to determine the significance of fermentation specifically.

Data Analysis and Representation:

The manuscript does not report effect sizes or confidence intervals for the data, which are critical for assessing biological relevance, especially in translational contexts.

Figures lack sufficient annotations to guide interpretation. For example, Figure 2 (Western blot) should indicate molecular weight markers and justify the specific signaling pathways selected.

Biological Relevance and Clinical Translation:

The in vitro model using HDFs is appropriate but limited. The discussion acknowledges this but could be improved by suggesting specific in vivo models (e.g., murine photoaging models) for future validation.

The focus solely on UVB-induced damage ignores the potential broader applicability of the extracts, such as protection against UVA or environmental pollutants.

Mechanistic Insights:

The discussion on fermentation enhancing bioactivity (e.g., flavonoid content) is convincing but speculative. Are there any specific fermentation byproducts identified that correlate with observed effects (e.g., HPLC or LC-MS data)? Without such analysis, the mechanistic claims are incomplete.

Ethical Considerations:

While the manuscript states that no ethical approval was required, the use of human-derived dermal fibroblasts demands a clearer mention of the cell line's origin and adherence to ethical standards for cell line use.

Minor Comments

Language and Terminology:

Certain phrases, such as "fermentation significantly enhanced bioactivity," are vague. Replace with specific metrics (e.g., "fermentation increased flavonoid content by X%, enhancing antioxidant activity by Y%").

Repetition in the Introduction regarding Cannabis sativa’s underexplored potential in skincare can be condensed.

Figures and Tables:

Table 1 should include significance levels for each comparison, not just different letter labels. Use asterisks or p-values for clarity.

Figures should have high resolution in the final submission to avoid interpretive issues during review.

Citations and Literature Integration:

Several references are over five years old. Consider citing recent studies on plant-based antiphotoaging agents or Cannabis sativa bioactivity.

The introduction lacks a detailed comparison with other plant extracts fermented with Lacticaseibacillus spp. Addressing this would position the study better in the context of current literature.

Formatting Issues:

Ensure uniformity in referencing styles, particularly with et al. usage.

Standardize units (e.g., μg/mL vs mg/mL) across the manuscript for consistency.

Limitations Section:

While some limitations are mentioned, the manuscript should specifically discuss the absence of mechanistic validations (e.g., metabolomic analyses of fermentation products) and the lack of UVA or other stressor evaluation.

Supplementary Information:

The supplementary data should detail the antibodies used in Western blotting, including catalog numbers and suppliers, for reproducibility.

Overall Assessment

The manuscript addresses a novel area of research with potential applications in natural skincare. However, it requires substantial revisions to improve clarity, depth, and rigor. Addressing the major comments will ensure the study's findings are robust and impactful, while minor comments focus on improving readability and presentation.

Reviewer #2: The study investigates the antiphotoaging properties of fermented Cannabis sativa stem extracts using a human dermal fibroblast (HDF) model. While the authors emphasize the underexplored biological effects of cannabis stems, they also acknowledge prior research on cannabis leaves and flowers. Although stems and leaves differ significantly in their bioactive substance content, the claimed novelty of this study warrants careful consideration.

The manuscript has several strengths, including its focus on an underutilized part of the plant and its exploration of fermentation as a means of enhancing bioactivity. However, there are several critical issues and clarifying points that should be addressed before the study can be considered for publication.

Key Comments and Questions

1. In the section describing cytotoxicity determination, it is unclear whether all samples (including those with extracts) were UVB-irradiated. If so, please clarify the rationale behind this approach. Cytotoxicity assay should only evaluate one compound/extract at a time.

2. On line 155, the term "CW" appears but is not defined in the methods section. If it refers to the cannabis water extract, why is it labeled "CW" here instead of "CS," as initially described?

3. The LC control group, which is defined as the culture supernatant of Lacticaseibacillus casei, shows notable biological effects in several assays, including:

- MMP-1 ELISA

- ROS scavenging assays (ABTS and DPPH)

- Polyphenol and flavonoid content assays

- How do the authors interpret these results? Given that LC is a control group without plant extracts, its high activity raises concerns about the contributions of bacterial metabolites or medium components.

4. While the focus on stems is unique, the inclusion of cannabis leaves and flowers in the study could have provided a comparative baseline. Were these parts excluded due to practical constraints or specific research objectives?

5. The manuscript mentions UVB-induced activation of ERK, JNK, and p65 as part of the photoaging model. However, it is unclear whether these signaling changes were the sole basis for evaluating photoaging. Were additional endpoints (e.g., collagen degradation or ROS production) assessed?

The activation of JNK in the UVB group appears less convincing. Could the authors provide a clearer explanation or replicate the data to confirm this pathway's role in UVB-induced photoaging?

Additionally, in the FCS group, phosphorylated p65 (p-p65) appears absent, whereas the CON group shows a baseline level of p-p65. This raises questions about the reproducibility of the data or the experimental conditions. Could the authors explain why p-p65 is entirely suppressed in FCS and not in the control?

6. The study reports a nearly two-fold increase in total flavonoid content in the fermented extract (FCS) compared to the non-fermented extract (CS). While fermentation is said to enhance flavonoid production, the specific mechanism remains unexplained. Do the authors attribute this to microbial enzymatic activity, precursor transformation, or other factors?

7. On line 322, the manuscript claims that FCS reduced UVB-induced ROS levels. However, no assay directly measuring ROS levels in the presence of UVB appears in the paper. Can the authors clarify or modify this statement?

8. - The ABTS results are described as significantly different between groups, but the data show minimal variation (e.g., 88.6% for FCS vs. 89.5% for CS). This should be addressed.

- In the DPPH assay, the LC control group demonstrated the highest scavenging potential, even outperforming the fermented extract (FCS). This observation contradicts the claim that fermentation enhances scavenging activity. How do the authors explain this?

9. -The LC group is defined as “L. casei culture without plant extracts”, yet it shows measurable levels of flavonoids and polyphenols. This finding is puzzling. Could this be due to assay interference, microbial metabolites, or contamination? Additional clarification is essential.

Summary

The study offers an intriguing approach to enhancing the antiphotoaging properties of Cannabis sativa stems through fermentation. However, several methodological inconsistencies and data interpretation issues need to be resolved. Specifically:

- Clarification of UVB irradiation protocols.

- Addressing discrepancies in the LC group’s activity.

- Providing mechanistic insights into the effects of fermentation on flavonoid and polyphenol levels.

- Revisiting claims related to ROS assays and ABTS/DPPH results.

Once these issues are addressed, the study will provide a stronger contribution to the field of natural anti-photoaging agents.

Reviewer #3: The authors have presented a study on the enhancement of anti-photo-aging properties of Cannabis sativa stem extracts by fermentation. The manuscript is well written, extremely detailed and easy to understand.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Aug 14;20(8):e0329634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329634.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


17 Jul 2025

Dear Dr. Hatahet,

We sincerely thank you and the reviewers for the thoughtful and constructive comments on our manuscript. We have carefully revised the manuscript to address all major and minor concerns. The revised version incorporates the following key changes:

1. Cytotoxicity assay clarification

2. New ROS measurement experiment: We conducted an additional intracellular ROS assay using DCFH-DA under UVB conditions.

3. Western blot replication and clarification: We repeated the Western blot experiments, confirming reproducible activation of ERK, JNK, and p65 upon UVB exposure. The 72 h fermented extract (FCS) strongly suppressed phosphorylation of these markers, as supported by densitometric analysis.

4. Mechanistic insight enhanced: We added a mechanistic explanation for the increase in flavonoid content, attributing it to enzymatic hydrolysis by L. casei. HPLC data confirm elevated levels of quercetin and kaempferol after fermentation.

5. Updated antioxidant assays and controls: We repeated both ABTS and DPPH assays using freshly prepared samples and included additional control groups (GAM, LC Sup, 0 h). Statistical analysis using asterisk-based notation was applied. The revised results better support the interpretation that fermentation enhances antioxidant activity.

6. Clarification on LC group activity: We addressed the unexpected activity in the LC Sup group by including a GAM-only control and performing HPLC. No flavonoids were detected in LC Sup, and the results are now interpreted as due to microbial metabolites, not contamination or media interference.

7. Formatting and transparency improvements:

o Table 1 updated with statistical significance indicators.

o Molecular weight markers added to all Western blots.

8. Expanded Discussion and limitations:

o Inclusion of murine models (HR-1, SKH-1) for future in vivo validation.

o Broader applicability to UVA and pollutant-induced skin damage discussed.

o Acknowledgement of the need for future untargeted metabolomic profiling.

We believe that these revisions have significantly strengthened the manuscript in both scientific rigor and clarity. A detailed point-by-point response to each reviewer comment is included in the revised submission.

Thank you again for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Young-Tae Park, Ph.D.

Center for Natural Product Efficacy Optimization, KIST, Gangneung, 25451, Republic of Korea

pyt1017@kist.re.kr

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.docx

pone.0329634.s009.docx (35.4KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Taher Hatahet

21 Jul 2025

Enhancement of antiphotoaging properties of Cannabis sativa stem water extracts by fermentation with Lacticaseibacillus casei

PONE-D-24-50437R1

Dear Dr. PARK,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Taher Hatahet, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Dear Author

thanks for addressing reveiwers comments

Kind regards

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Taher Hatahet

PONE-D-24-50437R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. PARK,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Taher Hatahet

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. Raw data for Fig 1 (MTT-based cell viability assay).

    This dataset includes raw absorbance-derived cell viability percentages of human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) treated with various concentrations (0, 100, 250, 500, and 1000 μg/mL) of Cannabis sativa stem extracts, non-fermented (0 h) and fermented (48 h, 72 h, 96 h), as well as Lacticaseibacillus casei culture supernatant (LC Sup), Gifu Anaerobic Medium (GAM), and ascorbic acid. Viability was assessed by MTT assay after 24 h treatment without UVB exposure. Data are presented as individual replicate values (n = 3) and corresponding mean ± standard deviation for each condition.

    (PDF)

    pone.0329634.s001.pdf (186.1KB, pdf)
    S2 Data. Raw data for Supplementary Fig 1 (MTT assay: UVB cytotoxicity).

    This dataset presents the raw absorbance values of HDFs exposed to increasing doses of UVB light (0–70 mJ/cm²) for 24 hours.

    (PDF)

    pone.0329634.s002.pdf (107.8KB, pdf)
    S3 Data. Raw data for Fig 3B (MMP-1 ELISA assay).

    This dataset provides the calculated MMP-1 concentrations (ng/mL) in HDFs treated with non-fermented (0 h) and fermented C. sativa stem extracts (48 h, 72 h, 96 h), LC Sup, GAM, and ascorbic acid (positive control), following UVB irradiation at 25 mJ/cm². All treatment groups except the untreated control were UVB-irradiated. MMP-1 levels in culture supernatants were measured 24 hours after treatment. Each condition was tested in triplicate (n = 3), and data are reported as mean ± standard deviation in ng/mL.

    (PDF)

    pone.0329634.s003.pdf (126.8KB, pdf)
    S4 Data. Raw data for Supplementary Fig 3 (Quantification of quercetin and kaempferol).

    This dataset contains the quantified concentrations (µg/g extract) of quercetin and kaempferol in C. sativa stem extracts fermented for 0 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h. GAM medium and LC Sup were also analyzed. Quantification was performed by HPLC.

    (PDF)

    pone.0329634.s004.pdf (130.6KB, pdf)
    S1 Table. Antibodies used for western blot analysis.

    1, Phospho-SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) (G9) Mouse mAb; 2, SAPK/JNK Antibody; 3, Phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204) (D13.14.4E) XP® Rabbit mAb; 4, p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (137F5) Rabbit mAb; 5, Phospho-NF-κB p65 (Ser536) (93H1) Rabbit mAb; 6, NF-κB p65 (C22B4) Rabbit mAb; 7, GAPDH (14C10) Rabbit mAb; 8, mouse anti-rabbit IgG-HRP; 9, m-IgGκ BP-HRP.

    (PDF)

    pone.0329634.s005.pdf (109.8KB, pdf)
    S1 Fig. Assessment of cytotoxicity of the exposure to UVB light.

    The viability of human dermal fibroblasts was evaluated using an MTT assay. Cells were irradiated with UVB (0–70 mJ/cm2) for 24 h. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3 per group).

    (PDF)

    pone.0329634.s006.pdf (105.7KB, pdf)
    S2 Fig. Western blot analysis of signaling pathways involved in UVB-induced photoaging.

    HDFs were exposed to UVB (25 mJ/cm²) and treated with C. sativa stem water extracts (0 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h), LC Sup, or GAM for 24 h. Protein expression levels were assessed using antibodies against phosphorylated and total forms of ERK, JNK, and p65. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Representative blot images are shown for (A) p-ERK, (B) total ERK, (C) p-JNK, (D) total JNK, (E) p-p65, (F) p65, and (G) GAPDH. Molecular weights are indicated in kilodaltons (kDa).

    (PDF)

    pone.0329634.s007.pdf (220.5KB, pdf)
    S3 Fig. Quantification of quercetin and kaempferol.

    The concentrations of quercetin and kaempferol were determined in C. sativa stem extracts fermented for 0 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h, as well as in controls including GAM, LC Sup, and the non-fermented 0 h sample.

    (PDF)

    pone.0329634.s008.pdf (93.7KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.docx

    pone.0329634.s009.docx (35.4KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES