Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 16.
Published in final edited form as: PRX Life. 2024 Oct 21;2(4):043004. doi: 10.1103/prxlife.2.043004

Signatures of structural disorder in the developing Drosophila germband epithelium

Christian Cupo 1, Cole Allan 1,2, Vikram Ailiani 1, Karen E Kasza 1,*
PMCID: PMC12356154  NIHMSID: NIHMS2046179  PMID: 40822887

Abstract

Epithelial cells generate functional tissues in developing embryos through collective movements and shape changes. In some morphogenetic events, a tissue dramatically reorganizes its internal structure — often generating high degrees of structural disorder — to accomplish changes in tissue shape. However, the origins of structural disorder in epithelia and what roles it might play in morphogenesis are poorly understood. We study this question in the Drosophila germband epithelium, which undergoes dramatic changes in internal structure as cell rearrangements drive elongation of the embryo body axis. Using two order parameters that quantify volumetric and shear disorder, we show that structural disorder increases during body axis elongation and is strongly linked with specific developmental processes. Both disorder metrics begin to increase around the onset of axis elongation, but then plateau at values that are maintained throughout the process. Notably, the disorder plateau values for volumetric disorder are similar to those for random cell packings, suggesting this may reflect a limit on tissue behavior. In mutant embryos with disrupted external stresses from the ventral furrow, both disorder metrics reach wild-type maximum disorder values with a delay, correlating with delays in cell rearrangements. In contrast, in mutants with disrupted internal stresses and cell rearrangements, volumetric disorder is reduced compared to wild type and shear disorder depends on specific external stress patterns. Together, these findings demonstrate that internal and external stresses both contribute to epithelial tissue disorder and suggest that the maximum values of disorder in a developing tissue reflect physical or biological limits on morphogenesis.

I. INTRODUCTION

Epithelial tissue sheets comprise confluent packings of cells that undergo dramatic changes in overall shape and internal structure during development. The shapes and packings of cells in embryonic epithelia are diverse and can be regular and ordered or highly irregular and disordered. Moreover, the cell packings of a single tissue can change dramatically during development, mediated by changes in cell shapes and movements within the tissue [1–3]. For example, cells in the Drosophila germband epithelium initially tend to take on roughly regular, hexagonal shapes [4], which are optimized tilings for the densest arrangement of cells [5], but become more irregular as the tissue remodels during body axis elongation [4]. However, it is not well understood what biological factors regulate tissue disorder or how tissue disorder might influence tissue behavior and function.

Convergent extension of the Drosophila germband epithelium during body axis elongation is a powerful model for studying the biological and physical factors that regulate epithelial structure and remodeling [6–13]. Internal stresses from planar polarized actomyosin contractility and external stresses from neighboring developmental events both contribute to rapid elongation of the germband along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis of the embryo [7–12, 14–18]. This global tissue elongation is mediated by oriented cell rearrangements and cell shape changes that allow the tissue to remodel and flow [8, 10, 13–15, 19, 20]. Although it has been observed that cell shapes change and become more disordered during axis elongation [4, 13], the mechanisms driving this disorder and the resulting impacts on tissue elongation remain poorly understood.

The cell rearrangements and cell shape changes that mediate tissue remodeling are thought to be driven by an interplay between local, internal stresses and global, embryo-scale stresses. Internal stresses are generated by a planar polarized pattern of actomyosin contractility, that is thought to arise from AP patterning systems [6, 7, 21] along with mechanosensitive feedback mechanisms [9, 18]. In addition, the germband experiences external stresses from ventral furrow formation (VFF) pulling along the dorsal-ventral (DV) axis and posterior midgut invagination (PMI) pulling along the AP axis [10–12, 15, 16, 20, 22, 23]. A recent study has proposed that the stretch from the ventral furrow provides a mechanical cue to enrich myosin planar polarity and facilitate germband extension [18]. Together, these internal and external stresses are thought to control tissue structure and remodeling, but it has been difficult to decouple the effects of each.

Tissue structure is likely to influence biological and mechanical behaviors of the tissue. Work from our group and others has shown that the average cell shape in a tissue is a good predictor of whether the tissue will remodel and flow, similar to a fluid, or instead resist remodeling, similar to an elastic solid [13, 24–28]. Recent studies have demonstrated links between metrics for the heterogeneity in local tissue structure, i.e. structural disorder, and transitions in solid-like, liquid-like, and gas-like behavior of cultured tissues and developing embryos [29]. However, it remains unclear if and how structural order or disorder in a tissue might facilitate tissue remodeling.

Here, we study structural disorder in the developing Drosophila germband epithelium by analyzing volumetric and shear order parameters. We show that structural disorder in the germband increases during axis elongation in characteristic steps that coincide with developmental events in the embryo. We uncover that internal and external stress patterns contribute in distinct ways to volumetric and shear disorder, which are in turn linked with the rates and final extents of tissue remodeling. We find that the maximum magnitudes of structural disorder in the germband are in the range expected for purely random cell packings that have minimum cell-cell spacings, suggesting geometrical constraints on tissue disorder in this context. Overall, this work uncovers the biological and physical mechanisms that contribute to epithelial tissue disorder and highlight a central role for tissue disorder in epithelial remodeling and morphogenesis.

II. RESULTS

Structural disorder increases in the germband epithelium during body axis elongation

To explore how structural disorder evolves in developing epithelial tissues, we analyzed volumetric and shear disorder in the developing Drosophila embryo during body axis elongation. In Drosophila, the embryonic body axis rapidly doubles in length along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis through convergent extension movements of the germband epithelium (Fig. 1a) [6]. Tissue elongation is mediated in large part by rapid rearrangements of epithelial cells within the germband (Fig. 1b) [8, 19]. To analyze epithelial tissue structure, we fluorescently labeled cell membranes, imaged the embryo by confocal microscopy, segmented the timelapse movies, and triangulated the centroids of cells within the ventrolateral region of the germband (Fig. 1c) (see Materials and Methods).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Structural disorder in the germband epithelium of the developing Drosophila embryo. (a) During body axis elongation, the germband epithelium (GB) undergoes convergent extension, narrowing along the dorsal-ventral (DV) axis and extending to twice its length along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis. (b) Tissue elongation (black) is facilitated by cellular rearrangements (green) that drive internal structural remodeling. The mean and standard deviation between 4 embryos is plotted. (c) Embryos are imaged in a ventrolateral orientation, and an ROI for analyses is selected such that it is 2–3 cells away from the cephalic and ventral furrows. (d) Structural disorder in the tissue can be characterized by triangulating cell centroids and comparing to a reference configuration. (e) Volumetric disorder: each triangle is compared to a reference triangle with an area equal to the average triangle area at that time point. (f) Shear disorder: each triangle is compared to a reference triangle that is an equilateral triangle of equal area. (g,h) Triangulation of the germband at t=-5, 5, and 20 min. The color of each triangle represents its volumetric (density variation) or shear (irregularity compared to an equilateral triangle) deformation. Scale bar, 100μm.

To explore tissue structural disorder, we quantified the local volume and shear deformations in the triangulated tissue, as previously described [29]. Briefly, for the nth triangle in the tissue triangulation, the volume and shear invariants, voln and shearn, are calculated by comparing a deformed state to a reference state and determining the deformation (Fig. 1d). voln reflects how the triangle area deviates from the average area at each time point (Fig. 1e), and shearn reflects the distortion from an equilateral triangle of the same area (Fig. 1f). Both invariants would be minimized if the triangulation comprises equilateral triangles of uniform area, i.e. a regular, isotropic honeycomb lattice has no volumetric or shear disorder. Triangles with small values of voln have areas close to the average area of all the triangles analyzed at that time point, while triangles with much larger or smaller areas than the average have large positive or negative values of voln, respectively. Triangles with small values of shearn have geometries similar to an equilateral triangle, while triangles with large values of shearn display strong distortions relative to an equilateral triangle. We find that the variation across the germband of voln (Fig. 1g) and shearn (Fig. 1h) tends to increase over time during axis elongation (see also Fig. S1).

To quantify the growing structural disorder, we calculated two structural order parameters, Φvol and Φshear (Materials and Methods) [29]. The volumetric order parameter, Φvol=ln⁡voln2, represents density fluctuations across the tissue. The shear order parameter, Φshear=ln⁡shearn, represents the irregularity of triangles and will be non-zero for configurations in which triangles deviate from equilateral triangles, both due to the variability between triangles and any overall stretch in the tissue. Prior to axis elongation, both order parameters take on small, relatively constant values (Fig. 2a–c), indicating low levels of structural disorder in the germband. Around the onset of axis elongation, Φvol and Φshear both begin to increase (Fig. 2a–c), indicating growing structural disorder associated with tissue elongation. The values of Φvol and Φshear are not strongly affected by the specific choice of analysis region (Fig. S2, S3) or embryo mounting procedure (Fig. S4). Moreover, the overall trends are not strongly affected by the tissue triangulation method used (Fig. S5). Of note, the qualitative trends in Φvol are independent of whether disorder is measured for the tissue triangulation or for the cell areas themselves (Fig. S5).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Structural disorder grows in the germband epithelium during axis elongation. (a) The volumetric order parameter Φvol and shear order parameter Φshear averaged across embryos (N=4 embryos). Shaded error bars represent standard deviation. Vertical dashed lines represent time points at which abrupt slope changes occur. The positions of the n changes in slope are identified using n+1 linear fits and minimizing the residuals. Vertical shaded regions around these lines represent values where the root mean squared deviation is within 10%. (b,c) Individual Φvol and Φshear curves over time for four wild-type embryos. Characteristic patterns or signatures of disorder are shared among embryos. (d) Schematics of axis elongation highlighting key developmental events in the germband (green) and neighboring regions of the embryo. (e) The first increase of Φshear in the germband (black) immediately follows an increase of Φshear in the neighboring ventral furrow region (blue). (f) The initial increase and final plateau in Φvol align with the onset of cell rearrangement events and the time point of maximum rearrangement rate, respectively.

We find that Φvol and Φshear increase in characteristic patterns that are consistent among wild-type embryos (Fig. 2a–c). We identified patterns in the growing disorder by finding points in the disorder vs. time curves where there are abrupt changes in slope. The first increase in disorder is an increase in Φshear 3 to 4 min before the onset of axis elongation, which occurs in the absence of changes in Φvol (Fig. 2a–c). Notably, this increase in germband shear disorder occurs just after the neighboring ventral furrow forms (Fig. 2d) and has its own increase in Φshear (Fig. 2e, Fig. S6), suggesting that shear disorder in the germband is influenced by external stresses from the ventral furrow stretching the germband.

Just after the onset of axis elongation, which begins at t=0min, volumetric disorder begins to increase. The increase in Φvol aligns with the start of cell rearrangements (Fig. 2f), in which cells change contacts with their neighbors to promote tissue remodeling. These rearrangement events are driven by internal stresses from planar polarized actomyosin, suggesting that cell shape changes associated with rearrangement events contribute to volumetric disorder. Around the same time, Φshear temporarily plateaus, corresponding to tissue-scale reorientation of cell shapes from being stretched along the DV axis to being stretched along the AP axis (Fig. S7), likely due to competing effects of the ventral furrow pulling along the DV axis and the posterior midgut pulling along the AP axis.

Notably, we find that both Φvol and Φshear plateau at t=5-10min at maximum values that are then maintained throughout the rest of the process. Φvol reaches a maximum 5 min after the onset of axis elongation, which corresponds to the timing of the maximum rate of cell rearrangement in the germband (Fig. 2f). Φshear plateaus a few minutes later. These disorder plateaus begin well before the end of axis elongation, while the tissue is still rapidly remodeling, suggesting that the maximum disorder plateaus might reflect a biological or physical constraint in the germband.

Taken together, these results demonstrate that structural disorder increases in the germband around the onset of axis elongation before reaching maximum plateau values that are then maintained through the rest of the process. Before reaching these plateaus, structural disorder increases in characteristic patterns or signatures, which are correlated with developmental events in the embryo.

External stresses from the ventral furrow influence germband structural disorder but not the maximum disorder reached

The timing of the initial increase in Φshear suggests a link between structural disorder in the germband and stresses from furrow formation in the neighboring ventral region of the embryo. To test this directly, we studied tissue disorder in snail twist (sna twi) mutant embryos in which ventral furrow formation (VFF) is disrupted (Fig. 3d). Initially, the germband of sna twi embryos displays lower values of Φvol and Φshear compared to wild-type embryos (Fig. 3a–c, Fig. S8), indicating more ordered tissue structure. The initial increase in Φshear observed around t=-3min in wild-type embryos is not present in sna twi embryos, demonstrating that this increase in shear disorder is driven by the ventral furrow. Instead, in sna twi embryos, Φshear and Φvol begin to increase just after t=0min.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Structural disorder growth in the germband epithelium is delayed by disruption of ventral furrow invagination in sna twi mutant embryos. (a) Average Φvol and Φshear in the germband of sna twi mutant embryos (N = 3) (red) compared to wild type (N = 4) (black). Shaded error bars represent standard deviation between embryos. Vertical red dashed lines indicate positions of slope changes in curves from sna twi embryos. For reference, dashed, vertical black lines represent the timing of slope changes at the maximum disorder plateau in wild-type embryos. The maximum plateau values of Φvol and Φshear are delayed by 3.25 and 6 min, respectively, compared to wild-type embryos. (b,c) Volumetric (cyan) and shear (purple) deformation for the tissue triangulation at t=-10 and t=20min. (d) Schematics of key developmental events in sna twi mutant embryos with disrupted ventral furrow invagination. Disrupting the ventral furrow alters the external stress patterns acting on the germband. (e) Cell rearrangement rate in sna twi (red) and wild-type (black) embryos. Vertical dashed lines represent the slope change signature in Φvol that marks the time point of reaching the maximum Φvol in sna twi (red) and wild-type (black) embryos (c.f. panel a). In sna twi embryos, the delay in reaching maximum Φvol aligns with a delay in reaching the maximum rearrangement rate. (f) Rate of volumetric disorder growth (average slope of Φvol(t) between slope changes) in wild-type and sna twi embryos. (g) Rate of shear disorder growth (average slope of Φshear(t) between slope changes) in wild-type and sna twi embryos. WT 1st and WT 2nd correspond to the first and second shear disorder increases in Fig. 2a.

Despite starting out more ordered, Φshear and Φvol in the germband of sna twi embryos reach the same maximum plateau values as in wild-type embryos, but with a time delay (Fig. 3a). Once they begin to increase, the rates of disorder growth are comparable in sna twi and wild-type embryos (Fig. 3f,g), resulting in time delays of 3.25 min for Φvol and 6 min for Φshear for reaching the plateau values (Fig. 3a). sna twi embryos also display a delay in cell rearrangements, reaching the same maximum rearrangement rate as wild-type embryos but with a ~ 3 min delay (Fig. 3e). These delays in sna twi embryos suggest that the ventral furrow might facilitate rapid axis elongation in wild-type embryos, an idea consistent with recent reports [18].

Notably, the maximum plateau values of Φshear and Φvol are the same in sna twi and wild-type embryos, indicating that external stresses from the ventral furrow do not affect the final structural disorder in the germband. One possible explanation is that loss of external stresses from the ventral furrow could be compensated for by other mechanisms. Alternatively, it is possible that the ventral furrow only influences germband tissue disorder during the first minutes of axis elongation before other factors dominate, such as internal myosin planar polarity (Fig. 3d). In either case, our results suggest that the maximum plateau values of structural disorder we observe in both wild-type and sna twi embryos reflect biological or physical constraints in the tissue that can be reached via different developmental trajectories.

Internal stresses from myosin planar polarity play central roles in generating structural disorder in the germband

As external stresses from the ventral furrow were not sufficient to explain the structural disorder increases in the germband, we wondered if internal stresses associated with actomyosin contractility in the germband might be responsible for structural disorder in the tissue. To explore this possibility, we investigated two different mutants that disrupt AP patterning systems required for myosin planar polarity in the germband. Krüppel (Kr) mutants have partially disrupted AP patterning and display disrupted myosin planar polarity and reduced cell rearrangement in the central region of the germband (Fig. 4a). In contrast, bicoid nanos torso-like (bcd nos tsl) mutants have more fully disrupted AP patterning, displaying disrupted myosin planar polarity in the germband as well as disrupted posterior midgut invagination (Fig. 4b). Both mutants are expected to have disrupted internal stresses within the germband, while bcd nos tsl is expected to additionally have disrupted external stresses along the AP axis.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Structural disorder growth is disrupted in mutant embryos with disrupted AP patterning. (a) Schematics of key developmental events in Kr mutant embryos with disrupted myosin planar polarity in anterior and central regions of the germband. Disrupting myosin planar polarity alters the anisotropic internal stress patterns in the germband. (b) Schematics of key developmental events in bcd nos tsl mutant embryos with disrupted myosin planar polarity in the germband and disrupted posterior midgut invagination. Disrupting posterior midgut invagination alters the external stress patterns acting on the germband. (c) Average Φvol and Φshear in the germband of Kr (purple) (N = 3) and bcd nos tsl (yellow) (N = 5) mutants compared to wild type (black). Shaded error bars represent standard deviation between embryos. Vertical dashed lines indicate locations of slope changes within each embryo group. (d) Volumetric (cyan) and shear (purple) deformation for the tissue triangulation at t=-10 and 5 min in Kr mutants. (e) Volumetric (cyan) and shear (purple) deformation for the tissue triangulation in bcd nos tsl mutant embryos at t=-10 and 5 min. (f) Cell rearrangement rates in Kr, bcd nos tsl, and wild-type embryos. Rates of volumetric (g) and shear (h) disorder growth (average slope of Φshear(t) between slope changes) for wild-type, Kr, and bcd nos tsl embryos. Wild-type 1st and wild-type 2nd correspond to the first and second shear disorder increases in Fig. 2a.

Both mutants display low values of Φvol prior to axis elongation, similar to that in wild-type embryos (Fig. 4c; see also Fig. S9 and Fig. S10). Φvol begins to increase around the same time as in wild-type embryos, just after t=0, and increases at a slower rate, consistent with internal stresses and/or cell rearrangements driving this disorder. Notably, the bcd nos tsl mutant does not reach the maximum disorder values observed in wild-type embryos (Fig. 4c). The volumetric disorder reductions (Fig. 4g) are associated with strongly reduced cell rearrangements in these embryos (Fig. 4f). These results show that volumetric disorder is strongly linked with AP patterning. The results from Kr mutants demonstrate that internal stresses and cell rearrangements associated with myosin planar polarity contribute to volumetric disorder. The stronger effects in bcd nos tsl mutants might be explained by more severely disrupted myosin planar polarity and/or disrupted posterior midgut invagination.

To distinguish between these possibilities, we performed our analyses on a previously published movie of a torso (tor) mutant embryo with a cauterization perturbation [20]. Posterior midgut invagination, but not myosin planar polarity, is disrupted in tor mutants, and the cauterization perturbation further reduced external stresses along the AP axis. We found that this embryo displays volumetric disorder similar to in wild-type embryos (Fig. S11), suggesting that planar polarized myosin is sufficient to promote high levels of volumetric disorder in the germband even in a situation with reduced external stress along the AP axis. Taken together, these results reveal a key role for internal stresses in driving volumetric disorder in the germband.

Both Kr and bcd nos tsl mutants also display low values of Φshear prior to axis elongation, similar to wild-type embryos, before beginning to increase around the onset of axis elongation (Fig. 4c). In Kr mutants, shear deformations are not evenly distributed across the germband, being more concentrated at the posterior end where midgut invagination is pulling on the germband (Fig. 4d). This effect is less pronounced in wild-type embryos in which cell rearrangements can help relax this stretch. Kr mutants reach about the same maximum plateau value of Φshear as wild-type embryos (Fig. 4c), suggesting that internal myosin planar polarity is not essential for generating high levels of shear disorder and that external stresses might play a more dominant role. To explore the role of external stresses further, we examined Φshear in the tor mutant movie with disrupted posterior midgut invagination; Φshear takes on low to moderate values that do not increase during axis elongation, supporting the idea that external stresses play a key role in reaching high levels of Φshear (Fig. S11).

Given the strong stretching observed in the germband of Kr mutants, we examined how tissue-level stretching contributes to Φshear by calculating an alternative shear order parameter in which shear¯n, the mean value of shearn at each time point, is subtracted from the value of shearn for each triangle, prior to calculating the order parameter, Φshear,alt=ln⁡∣shearn-shear¯n∣. A stretched hexagonal lattice has Φshear,alt=0. For wild-type and sna twi mutant embryos, this alternative approach does not yield significantly different results (Fig. S12), indicating that variation in the extent of triangle stretching dominates over the average stretching of the whole tissue. In Kr mutants and to a lesser extent in bcd nos tsl mutants, we see reductions in Φshear,alt compared to Φshear at later times, indicating that overall tissue stretch has larger contributions to Φshear in these contexts (Fig. S12).

In bcd nos tsl mutants, Φshear increases rapidly just prior to the onset of axis elongation before plateauing early at a reduced level of shear disorder (Fig. 4c). Given the disruption of myosin planar polarity and posterior midgut invagination in these embryos, these results support the idea that this early increase in shear disorder is driven by the ventral furrow and then maintained throughout the rest of axis elongation. Interestingly, bcd nos tsl mutants appear to be more rapidly stretched by the ventral furrow compared to wild-type embryos, with a faster shear disorder increase (Fig. 4c,e,h), suggesting that the germband may be more compliant in bcd nos tsl mutants.

Taken together, these results demonstrate central roles for internal stresses associated with myosin planar polarity in tissue structural disorder. The effects of internal stresses and cell intercalation are most clear in the signatures of Φvol, although other factors also contribute. In addition, both internal stresses associated with myosin planar polarity and external stresses associated with posterior midgut invagination and ventral furrow invagination contribute to Φshear in the germband.

Linking structural disorder to tissue elongation

To combine and visualize all of our data on structural disorder, we plotted the trajectories that wild-type and mutant embryos take in the Φvol and Φshear parameter space during axis elongation. We find that each embryo group takes a distinct path through the parameter space as volumetric and shear disorder grow. However, all trajectories appear to converge towards and not exceed the values of Φvol≈0.20 and Φshear≈-1.5 (Fig. 5a), which correspond to the plateau values in wild type. It was unclear why volumetric and shear disorder plateau and what sets these plateau values.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Linking volumetric and shear disorder patterns to tissue elongation. (a) Trajectories through the Φshear-Φvol parameter space over time during axis elongation. The extent of tissue elongation is indicated by the color of each data point. Stars, point towards which volumetric and shear disorder converge. (b) Tissue elongation over time for wild type (green), sna twi (red), Kr (purple), and bcd nos tsl (yellow). Mean ± standard deviation between embryos. The procedure for analyzing tissue length is provided in the methods section. (c) Average tissue elongation rates between t=5min to t=20min for each group. The sum of elongation rates for sna twi and bcd nos tsl embryos is represented by the dashed magenta line. (d) Tissue elongation rate vs. plateau values of Φvol and Φshear. (e,f) Randomly generated tilings of cell packings using densities and minimum spacings characteristic of the germband. Overlaid volumetric and shear deformations for the resulting triangulation. (g) The plateau value of Φvol in the wild-type germband (green) overlaps the range of values for random cell packings with densities and minimum spacings characteristic of the germband (gray horizontal band). The small, intermediate plateau of Φshear in the germband (green) overlaps with the range of values for random cell packings with densities and minimum spacings characteristic of the germband (gray horizontal band). The final plateau exceeds values for random packings, likely due to anisotropy in the germband.

One possibility is that tissue elongation requires a concomitant increase in disorder. In this case, structural disorder is essentially a readout of the history of tissue remodeling via cell rearrangements and/or cell stretching. However, this is not consistent with the observation that both Φvol and Φshear plateau at t=5-10min in wild-type embryos, well before the tissue has fully elongated (Fig. 5b, Fig. S13).

A second possibility is that structural disorder is instead a readout of the current rate of tissue remodeling. In this case, structural disorder should be directly related to the instantaneous rates of tissue elongation or cell rearrangement. The maximum value of disorder would then be set by embryonic mechanics that control tissue deformation rates. Supporting this idea, we found that Φvol reaches a maximum at the same time that the maximum rate of cell rearrangement is achieved in wild-type embryos at t=5min (c.f. Fig. 2a,f). However, after this time point, Φvol maintains its plateau value, while the cell rearrangement rate slowly decreases (c.f. Fig. 2a,f). Moreover, the average tissue elongation rates from t=5-20min for wild type, sna twi, and Kr take on different values, while Φvol and Φshear have similar plateau values (Fig. 5c,d). Thus, disorder is not simply related with either the extent or the instantaneous rate of tissue remodeling.

A third possibility is that the observed disorder plateaus might reflect some type of geometrical [30] or maximum entropy constraint [31]. In this case, disorder might increase due to tissue remodeling but then reach a maximum value set by limits on tissue disorder, even as the tissue continues remodeling. To explore this possibility, we needed a reference for comparing the magnitudes of Φvol and Φshear observed in the germband. We started by comparing our results to model tissues with random cell packings. We generated tilings of random cell packings using ranges of cell densities and minimum centroid spacings that we measured in the germband movies (Materials and Methods)(Fig. 5e,f, Fig. S14) and quantified the range of values of Φvol and Φshear for the resulting packings (Fig. 5g, Fig. S14).

Notably, the maximum plateau value of Φvol for the wild-type germband falls within the range we calculated for random packings with minimum cell centroid spacings characteristic of the germband (Fig. 5g). Without restricting centroid spacing, purely random cell packings had disorder values well above those in the germband (Fig. S14b). This indicates that, in terms of density fluctuations, cell packings in the germband are initially more ordered than random cell packings and become more disordered as the tissue remodels, up until having features similar to those of a random packing. This suggests that random packings with a minimum cell centroid spacing may represent a limit on tissue disorder in this context.

In contrast, Φshear in the germband reaches larger values than calculated for random cell packings (Fig. 5g). This is consistent with tissue-level cell stretching in the germband that can produce higher shear deformations than expected for random, isotropic packings. Interestingly, the values of Φshear for random packings do match the small, intermediate plateau we observe in wild-type embryos, during a period when cells in the tissue are reorienting (Fig. 5g). In addition, the values of Φshear in tor mutant embryos, which have disrupted posterior midgut invagination but normal myosin planar polarity, overlap the range of values for random packings (Fig. S11). This suggests that random packings may also represent a limit on shear disorder in relatively isotropic tissues, and that tissue-level anisotropy from external or internal stresses can modulate this.

Finally, we asked how volumetric and shear disorder patterns are ultimately linked with the axis elongation process. Although tissue elongation rates were not simply related to either Φvol or Φshear (Fig. 5d), we noted that the embryos that elongated the most (wild type, sna twi, Kr) had relatively high Φvol and/or Φshear, while the embryos that elongated significantly less (bcd nos tsl) had reduced values of both Φvol and Φshear (Fig. 5a–c). This suggests a combination of volumetric disorder and shear disorder are central to tissue remodeling. Intriguingly, the sum of tissue elongation rates for sna twi (with disrupted ventral furrow) and bcd nos tsl (with disrupted myosin planar polarity and posterior midgut invagination) is nearly identical to the tissue elongation rate for wild type (Fig. 5c). This suggests that internal stresses associated with myosin planar polarity, external stresses from posterior midgut invagination, and external stresses from ventral furrow invagination may contribute in an additive fashion to axis elongation, although they are not additive in disorder. Taken together, these results demonstrate that rapid tissue elongation is linked with strong patterns of growing volumetric and shear disorder and suggest that there are physical limits on tissue disorder in this context.

III. DISCUSSION

Here we showed that volumetric and shear structural disorder increase in the germband epithelium during body axis elongation in Drosophila. We find characteristic signatures of disorder that are shared among wild-type embryos and are correlated with developmental events involving changing patterns of internal and/or external stresses acting on the germband. By studying mutant embryos with altered patterns of internal and external stresses, we show that internal stress patterns associated with myosin planar polarity and cell rearrangement are strongly linked with signatures in Φvol and also contribute to Φshear, while external stress patterns associated with ventral furrow and posterior midgut invagination have large contributions to Φshear. Although the structural disorder metrics begin to increase around the onset of axis elongation, they both quickly plateau at values that are then maintained. These plateau values are similar to those for random cell packings, suggesting this may reflect a limit on tissue behavior. Finally, we find that high volumetric and shear disorder is linked with rapid tissue elongation, although the precise balance between volumetric and shear disorder is distinct in the germband of wild-type and mutant embryos that elongate significantly.

We report links between cell intercalations driven by internal stresses and both Φvol and Φshear. Around a quartet of cells involved in a single cell rearrangement, there are volumetric and shear deformations as cells change shape in order to form a vertex where four or more cells meet (Fig. S15). When averaged across the tissue, these intercalation-associated deformations contribute to the increases in structural disorder over time. Notably, these effects are distinguishable in the delays or reductions of volumetric disorder in Kr and bcd nos tsl but not tor mutant embryos. In addition, external stresses associated with VFF and PMI contribute to structural disorder, with the effects most clearly distinguishable in the reductions of Φshear in sna twi, bcd nos tsl, and tor mutant embryos.

Our findings demonstrate that structural disorder grows during germband extension and is an important feature of this remodeling tissue. This extends prior work on topological disorder, which showed that the germband initially contains cells that are predominantly hexagonal in shape prior to axis elongation, before topological disorder increases during axis elongation [4]. In contrast, in the developing Drosophila wings and notum, cell rearrangements and junction fluctuations can increase geometric order, converting initially disordered cell packings into more hexagonally packed cells [32, 33]. In proliferating epithelia, cell divisions can also contribute to topological disorder during development [34]. Our results add to a growing body of work implicating geometric or structural signatures in jamming transitions, cell migration, wound healing, development, and cancer metastasis [13, 24–30, 35–39]. We find that the initial growth of structural disorder in the germband is correlated with the onset of rapid cell rearrangements and tissue remodeling, consistent with a possible solid-fluid-like transition [13]. However, the following nearly step-like disorder increases appear more like signatures of structural changes associated with specific developmental events.

It remains unclear if structural disorder is primarily an indicator of tissue remodeling or instead also feeds back to influence tissue remodeling. In particular, it is not known if the current structural order (disorder) in a tissue might facilitate (hinder) cell rearrangement and tissue remodeling. We find that after the germband reaches a maximum plateau value of volumetric disorder in wild-type and sna twi embryos, the cell rearrangement rates slowly begin to decrease. This suggests that cell rearrangement promotes disorder and that this disorder then might hinder further rearrangement. This is consistent with ideas from recent findings that disordered packings of cells extend more slowly than more ordered packings in some contexts [40, 41]. Future studies will be needed to fully address how tissue disorder impacts tissue remodeling and flow.

Our findings suggest that there are limits on the maximum structural disorder in the germband. The maximum volumetric disorder observed in the germband of wild-type and mutant embryos matches that of random tilings of cells with densities and minimum cell centroid spacings characteristic of the germband. In this study, we have compared germband cell packings to random tilings based on Voronoi tessellations and random sequential addition of seeds, but we note that there are many procedures for generating random tilings that could be explored in future work. In our random cell packings, volumetric disorder is strongly influenced by the minimum spacing between cell centroids (Fig. S14), suggesting that a minimum spacing between cells might underlie the limits on structural disorder we observe in the germband. This minimum spacing might arise because the apical domain is tightly regulated and maintained by epithelial cells or because nuclei might influence cell packings. Consistent with this possibility, recent reports highlight the importance of nucleus size and packings [42, 43].

Our findings support the notion that internal stresses from myosin planar polarity and external stresses from ventral furrow and posterior midgut invagination all contribute to tissue remodeling. There have been conflicting reports on the role of the ventral furrow in germband extension. It has recently been proposed that the stretch from ventral furrow invagination recruits myosin to cell junctions in the germband in a planar polarized fashion via mechanical feedback mechanisms, which then promote tissue flow [18]. However, other studies have shown that myosin planar polarity acts downstream of AP patterning systems [6, 7, 21] and have shown that the germband displays cell rearrangements and tissue elongation even when the ventral furrow is disrupted [10, 13, 44, 45]. Here, we find delays in disorder, cell rearrangement, and tissue elongation in sna twi mutant embryos, suggesting that the ventral furrow facilitates but is not required for tissue remodeling.

Taken together, our results identify growing structural disorder as a key feature of tissue remodeling. It remains unclear how structural disorder impacts tissue mechanics and might in turn influence patterns of cell rearrangements and tissue elongation during morphogenetic events. Moreover, it is not known how spatiotemporal patterns of cellular contractile and adhesive machineries drive structural disorder and might be influenced by tissue structure through mechanosensitive mechanisms. Future work will be needed to clarify these questions and explore how tissue disorder ultimately impacts tissue behavior and function.

IV. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fly lines and genetics.

Fly stocks were from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC) unless otherwise noted. Wild-type control embryos were yw with one maternal copy of a sqh–gap43:mCherry transgene [46] to label cell membranes and two maternal copies of sqh–GFP:ZipWT to label myosin II [47] (not used in this study). The Krüppel (Kr) mutant fly stock was a gift of Eric Wieschaus [6]. Kr embryos were zygotic Kr1 mutants with a sqh-gap43:mCherry transgene. The movies of snail twist (sna twi) and bicoid nanos torso-like (bcd nos tsl) mutant embryos were from Wang., et al. [13]. sna twi embryos were zygotic snaIIG05twiDfS60 mutants and expressed Spider:GFP to visualize cell outlines. The bcd nos tsl maternal mutant embryos were the progeny of bcdE1nosL7tsl146 homozygous females and expressed Resille:GFP to visualize cell outlines. The movie of the torso (tor) mutant embryo with cauterization was from Supplementary Video 11 in [20]. The tor maternal mutant embryos were progeny of tor4 homozygous females and expressed Ecad:GFP to visualize cell outlines.

Embryo preparation.

Embryos were generated at 23°C. Embryos were collected at stage 6, dechorionated in 50% bleach for 2 min, washed with water for 2 min, and mounted on a custom-made imaging chamber in a 50:50 mixture of halocarbon oils 27 and 700 between an oxygen-permeable membrane (YSI Incorporated) and a glass coverslip. Embryos are gently pushed against the coverslip so that a small fraction of the embryo is flat against the coverslip. The images shown are projections of z-slices several microns from the coverslip at the level of adherens junctions.

Confocal time-lapse imaging.

Imaging was performed at room temperature (approximately 18±1 °C) on a Zeiss LSM 880 laser-scanning confocal microscope. Embryos were placed in a ventrolateral or ventral orientation for imaging. A 561 nm diode laser was used for imaging mCherry, and a 488 nm Argon laser excitation was used for GFP. Imaging was performed using the Airyscan FAST module and a C-Apo 40X/1.2 NA water-immersion objective (Carl Zeiss, Germany). Movies were acquired as 9.1μm z-stacks with a 0.7μm z-step every 15 seconds. The first image was captured at the most apical surface of the embryo. Movies were rotated and z-projections taken using the Fiji distribution of ImageJ [48, 49]. Each z-projection was performed by taking a maximum intensity projection of 3 consecutive z-slices at the apical junctional plane of the tissue.

Separate movies were captured for imaging the germband and ventral furrow regions of the embryo. Embryos for germband movies were oriented ventrolaterally, and embryos for ventral furrow movies were oriented ventrally. Regions of interests for each movie were defined, and cells were segmented based on cell membrane markers. For movies of the germband, the confocal imaging field of view is chosen so that the cephalic furrow is just visible at one edge and the ventral furrow is just visible at another edge of the field during time periods of the movies. Our analysis ROI is defined as: 2–3 cells away from the cephalic furrow at the anterior side of the ROI, 2–3 cells away from the ventral furrow at the ventral side of the ROI, the boundary between the germband and amnioserosa or the imaging field of view at the dorsal side of the ROI, and the boundary of the imaging field of view on the posterior side of the ROI. Our results are not significantly affected by increasing or decreasing the size of the ROI (Fig. S2, S3) and are similar to results obtained by applying our analyses to previously published images from in toto microscopy of embryos mounted in agarose [50] (Fig. S4). For the ventral furrow movies, analysis concludes prior to tissue invagination and focuses on in-plane stretching.

Cell segmentation analysis.

Cell outlines were identified using a custom MATLAB code that implements a watershed algorithm [51] combined with a mask. The segmentation output was imported into the SEGGA tissue segmentation and analysis software [44] using a custom MATLAB script, and manual corrections were performed using the SEGGA GUI. In the final segmentation, each cell is represented as a polygon with straight edges. Custom MATLAB scripts were used to further process and analyze data.

Tissue elongation.

For all measurements of germband tissue length, the same ROI used for analyzing disorder was used for analyzing tissue length. Briefly, all cells that stay within the ROI for the whole movie are identified and tracked. Changes in length of this group of cells along the AP (horizontal) axis over time are reported, relative to the length at t=0.

Aligning movies.

To compare movies, t=0 min was taken as the onset of germband extension, which was identified by finding the time point corresponding to the minimum germband tissue length, when considering the group of cells that were in the ROI at all time frames. In addition, manual inspection confirmed that the cephalic furrow formation process is well-aligned by this definition of t=0 in each movie.

Rearrangement rate analysis.

Cells within the ROI were tracked and cell rearrangement events identified using SEGGA [44]. The number of rearrangements per cell in each time frame was calculated by dividing the number of cell neighbors lost in each time frame by the number of cells analyzed in that frame.

Calculation of Φvol and Φshear and identifying changes in slope in these disorder metrics.

The tissue was triangulated by finding the centers of all cells in the ROI and connecting adjacent centers. If four or more segments from a grouping of cells meet at a single node, an additional node was added at this point to create the triangulation [52]. Using this triangulation, Φvol and Φshear were calculated as shown previously [29]. Briefly, the volumetric and shear order parameters are defined as Φvol=ln⁡voln2 and Φshear=ln⁡shearn. The volumetric and shear deformations for individual triangles are calculated from the deformation gradient, F, where voln=det(F) and shearn=trFTF/det(F)-2. The deformation gradient is defined by the current and reference configurations F=TnTr-1. The current configuration for each triangle, n, is defined by the three vertices that link adjacent cells and is Tn=xn1-xn0xn2-xn0yn1-yn0yn2-yn0. The reference configuration is defined by an equilateral triangle with an area, A, equal to the average value for the time frame and is Tr=A11/20(3)/2). Time points of changes in slope in Φvol(t) and Φshear(t) were identified by first visually identifying the number of slope changes (n) and then using a custom MATLAB script to fit (n+1) linear fits to the volumetric and shear order parameter curves. This process was repeated for every iteration of possible time intervals until the sum of the residuals for all (n+1) linear fits were minimized. Error bars for the timing of these slope changes correspond to where the root mean squared deviation was within 10%.

Random cell tiling simulation

We generated randomly organized cell packings and calculated Φvol and Φshear for these random packings. To do this, we seeded points within a known area to act as the nucleation centers, i.e. random sequential addition (RSA). The number of nucleation points was varied to match the range of cell densities observed in germband movies. Additionally, we performed this analysis with and without varying the minimum distance between nucleation points to match the minimum spacing of cell centers observed in germband movies of 3–4 microns; this may help to account for biological mechanisms that maintain cell size and shape and/or incompressibility of cell nuclei or other internal cellular structures. We generated five unique Voronoi tilings and moved the seed points to the center of mass for each Voronoi cell (centroidal Voronoi diagram algorithm) [53]. We did this for each set of parameters and analyzed 5 different ROIs for each image. Each image was processed with the same pipeline as the germband movies. Briefly, the images were segmented with our algorithm and manually corrected in SEGGA before calculating Φvol and Φshear.

Error bars.

Data plotted represent mean value ± standard deviation unless otherwise noted.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary_Material

Acknowledgements.

We thank Erika Kusaka for help generating fly stocks, Rob Campbell for the MATLAB function shadederrorbar, and members of the Kasza Lab, Andrew Cupo, Haiqian Yang, Ming Guo, and Max Bi for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health Award Number R35GM138380 to K.E.K. and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Development of the National Institutes of Health Grant F31HD105405 to C.C. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Health. K.E.K. holds an NSF CAREER Award, Packard Fellowship, and Sloan Research Fellowship in Physics.

Footnotes

Code availability. Custom MATLAB scripts are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Data availability.

The data in this paper is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • [1].Lecuit T and Lenne P-F, Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 8, 633 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Jülicher F and Eaton S, Emergence of tissue shape changes from collective cell behaviours, Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 67, 103 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Herrera-Perez RM and Kasza KE, Biophysical control of the cell rearrangements and cell shape changes that build epithelial tissues, Current opinion in genetics & development 51, 88 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Zallen JA and Zallen R, Cell-pattern disordering during convergent extension in Drosophila, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 16, S5073 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Hales TC, The Honeycomb Conjecture, Discrete & Computational Geometry 25, 1 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Irvine KD and Wieschaus E, Cell intercalation during Drosophila germband extension and its regulation by pair-rule segmentation genes, Development 120, 827 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Zallen JA and Wieschaus E, Patterned Gene Expression Directs Bipolar Planar Polarity in Drosophila, Developmental Cell 6, 343 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Bertet C, Sulak L, and Lecuit T, Myosin-dependent junction remodelling controls planar cell intercalation and axis elongation, Nature 429, 667 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Simoes S. d. M., Röper J-C, Eaton S, and Zallen JA, Myosin II Dynamics Are Regulated by Tension in Intercalating Cells, Developmental Cell 17, 736 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Lye CM, Blanchard GB, Naylor HW, Muresan L, Huisken J, Adams RJ, and Sanson B, Mechanical Coupling between Endoderm Invagination and Axis Extension in Drosophila, PLOS Biology 13, e1002292 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Dicko M, Saramito P, Blanchard GB, Lye CM, Sanson B, and Étienne J, Geometry can provide long-range mechanical guidance for embryogenesis, PLOS Computational Biology 13, e1005443 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Streichan SJ, Lefebvre MF, Noll N, Wieschaus EF, and Shraiman BI, Global morphogenetic flow is accurately predicted by the spatial distribution of myosin motors, eLife 7, e27454 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Wang X, Merkel M, Sutter LB, Erdemci-Tandogan G, Manning ML, and Kasza KE, Anisotropy links cell shapes to tissue flow during convergent extension, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 13541 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Rauzi M, Verant P, Lecuit T, and Lenne P-F, Nature and anisotropy of cortical forces orienting Drosophila tissue morphogenesis, Nature Cell Biology 10, 1401 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Butler LC, Blanchard GB, Kabla AJ, Lawrence NJ, Welchman DP, Mahadevan L, Adams RJ, and Sanson B, Cell shape changes indicate a role for extrinsic tensile forces in Drosophila germ-band extension, Nature Cell Biology 11, 859 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Rauzi M, Krzic U, Saunders TE, Krajnc M, Ziherl P, Hufnagel L, and Leptin M, Embryo-scale tissue mechanics during Drosophila gastrulation movements, Nature Communications 6, 8677 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Yu JC and Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Local mechanical forces promote polarized junctional assembly and axis elongation in Drosophila, eLife 5, e10757 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Gustafson HJ, Claussen N, De Renzis S, and Streichan SJ, Patterned mechanical feedback establishes a global myosin gradient, Nature Communications 13, 7050 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Blankenship JT, Backovic ST, Sanny J, Weitz O, and Zallen JA, Multicellular Rosette Formation Links Planar Cell Polarity to Tissue Morphogenesis, Developmental Cell 11, 459 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Collinet C, Rauzi M, Lenne P-F, and Lecuit T, Local and tissue-scale forces drive oriented junction growth during tissue extension, Nature Cell Biology 17, 1247 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Paré AC, Vichas A, Fincher CT, Mirman Z, Farrell DL, Mainieri A, and Zallen JA, A positional Toll receptor code directs convergent extension in Drosophila, Nature 515, 523 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Leptin M, Drosophila Gastrulation: From Pattern Formation to Morphogenesis, Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 11, 189 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Kong D, Wolf F, and Großhans J, Forces directing germ-band extension in Drosophila embryos, Mechanisms of Development Roles of physical forces in development, 144, 11 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Bi D, Lopez JH, Schwarz JM, and Lisa Manning M, Energy barriers and cell migration in densely packed tissues, Soft Matter 10, 1885 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Park J-A, Kim JH, Bi D, Mitchel JA, Qazvini NT, Tantisira K, Park CY, McGill M, Kim S-H, Gweon B, Notbohm J, Steward R Jr, Burger S, Randell SH, Kho AT, Tambe DT, Hardin C, Shore SA, Israel E, Weitz DA, Tschumperlin DJ, Henske E, Weiss ST, Manning ML, Butler JP, Drazen JM, and Fredberg JJ, Unjamming and cell shape in the asthmatic airway epithelium, Nature Materials 14, 1040 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Bi D, Lopez JH, Schwarz JM, and Manning ML, A density-independent rigidity transition in biological tissues, Nature Physics 11, 1074 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Bi D, Yang X, Marchetti MC, and Manning ML, Motility-Driven Glass and Jamming Transitions in Biological Tissues, Physical Review X 6, 021011 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Jain A, Ulman V, Mukherjee A, Prakash M, Cuenca MB, Pimpale LG, Münster S, Haase R, Panfilio KA, Jug F, Grill SW, Tomancak P, and Pavlopoulos A, Regionalized tissue fluidization is required for epithelial gap closure during insect gastrulation, Nature Communications 11, 5604 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Yang H, Pegoraro AF, Han Y, Tang W, Abeyaratne R, Bi D, and Guo M, Configurational fingerprints of multicellular living systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2109168118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Atia L, Bi D, Sharma Y, Mitchel JA, Gweon B, A Koehler S, DeCamp SJ, Lan B, Kim JH, and Hirsch R, Geometric constraints during epithelial jamming, Nature physics 14, 613 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Day TC, Höhn SS, Zamani-Dahaj SA, Yanni D, Burnetti A, Pentz J, Honerkamp-Smith AR, Wioland H, Sleath HR, Ratcliff WC, Goldstein RE, and Yunker PJ, Cellular organization in lab-evolved and extant multicellular species obeys a maximum entropy law, eLife 11, e72707 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Classen A-K, Anderson KI, Marois E, and Eaton S, Hexagonal Packing of Drosophila Wing Epithelial Cells by the Planar Cell Polarity Pathway, Developmental Cell 9, 805 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Curran S, Strandkvist C, Bathmann J, De Gennes M, Kabla A, Salbreux G, and Baum B, Myosin II Controls Junction Fluctuations to Guide Epithelial Tissue Ordering, Developmental Cell 43, 480 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Gibson MC, Patel AB, Nagpal R, and Perrimon N, The emergence of geometric order in proliferating metazoan epithelia, Nature 442, 1038 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Farhadifar R, Röper J-C, Aigouy B, Eaton S, and Jülicher F, The Influence of Cell Mechanics, Cell-Cell Interactions, and Proliferation on Epithelial Packing, Current Biology 17, 2095 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Founounou N, Farhadifar R, Collu GM, Weber U, Shelley MJ, and Mlodzik M, Tissue fluidity mediated by adherens junction dynamics promotes planar cell polarity-driven ommatidial rotation, Nature communications 12, 1 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Kim JH, Pegoraro AF, Das A, Koehler SA, Ujwary SA, Lan B, Mitchel JA, Atia L, He S, Wang K, Bi D, Zaman MH, Park J-A, Butler JP, Lee KH, Starr JR, and Fredberg JJ, Unjamming and collective migration in MCF10A breast cancer cell lines, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 521, 706 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Petridou NI, Corominas-Murtra B, Heisenberg C-P, and Hannezo E, Rigidity percolation uncovers a structural basis for embryonic tissue phase transitions, Cell 184, 1914 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Kang W, Ferruzzi J, Spatarelu C-P, Han YL, Sharma Y, Koehler SA, Mitchel JA, Khan A, Butler JP, Roblyer D, Zaman MH, Park J-A, Guo M, Chen Z, Pegoraro AF, and Fredberg JJ, A novel jamming phase diagram links tumor invasion to non-equilibrium phase separation, iScience 24, 103252 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Brauns F, Claussen NH, Wieschaus EF, and Shraiman BI, The Geometric Basis of Epithelial Convergent Extension, bioRxiv (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Claussen N, Brauns F, and Shraiman B, A Geometric Tension Dynamics Model of Epithelial Convergent Extension, arXiv (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Dutta S, Djabrayan NJ-V, Torquato S, Shvartsman SY, and Krajnc M, Self-Similar Dynamics of Nuclear Packing in the Early Drosophila Embryo, Biophysical Journal 117, 743 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Kim S, Amini R, and Campàs O, A nuclear jamming transition in vertebrate organogenesis, bioRxiv (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Farrell DL, Weitz O, Magnasco MO, and Zallen JA, SEGGA: a toolset for rapid automated analysis of epithelial cell polarity and dynamics, Development 144, 1725 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Lye CM, Blanchard GB, Evans J, Nestor-Bergmann A, and Sanson B, Drosophila axis extension is robust to an orthogonal pull by invaginating mesoderm, bioRxiv (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Martin AC, Gelbart M, Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Kaschube M, and Wieschaus EF, Integration of contractile forces during tissue invagination, Journal of Cell Biology 188, 735 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Kasza KE, Supriyatno S, and Zallen JA, Cellular defects resulting from disease-related myosin II mutations in Drosophila, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 22205 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Rueden CT, Schindelin J, Hiner MC, DeZonia BE, Walter AE, Arena ET, and Eliceiri KW, ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data, BMC Bioinformatics 18, 529 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J-Y, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, and Cardona A, Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis, Nature Methods 9, 676 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Stern T, Shvartsman SY, and Wieschaus EF, Deconstructing gastrulation at single-cell resolution, Current Biology 32, 1861 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Vincent L and Soille P, Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence 13, 583 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Merkel M, Etournay R, Popović M, Salbreux G, Eaton S, and Jülicher F, Triangles bridge the scales: Quantifying cellular contributions to tissue deformation, Physical Review E 95, 032401 (2017), publisher: APS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Klatt MA, Lovrić J, Chen D, Kapfer SC, Schaller FM, Schönhöfer PWA, Gardiner BS, Smith A-S, Schröder-Turk GE, and Torquato S, Universal hidden order in amorphous cellular geometries, Nature Communications 10, 811 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary_Material

Data Availability Statement

The data in this paper is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

RESOURCES