Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2025 Apr 20;37(8):e70033. doi: 10.1111/jne.70033

Proteomic analysis of plasma proteins during fentanyl withdrawal in ovariectomized female rats with and without estradiol

Patricia Sinclair 1, Navdeep S Dhanjal 2, E Blair Towers 3,4, Wendy J Lynch 3, Nadine Kabbani 1,2,5,
PMCID: PMC12358201  PMID: 40254411

Abstract

Evidence from both clinical and preclinical studies indicates that females experience a faster progression to drug addiction and more severe addiction‐related health effects compared with males. Estradiol (E2) plays a critical role in these sex differences. Recently, we demonstrated that E2 significantly exacerbates adverse health effects, such as respiratory distress and weight loss, in ovariectomized (OVX) female rats during withdrawal from extended‐access fentanyl self‐administration. To uncover the mechanisms behind E2‐enhanced toxicity, we investigated proteomic changes in the plasma of fentanyl‐withdrawn OVX rats under both E2 and non‐E2 presentation conditions.Plasma samples were collected following extended‐access fentanyl self‐administration during protracted withdrawal, when adverse health effects were most pronounced. Using liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐ESI MS/MS) we conducted proteomic analysis in OVX rats comparing the effect of fentanyl withdrawal, with or without E2, to drug‐naïve control rats.We found a significant effect of fentanyl withdrawal on plasma proteomes within OVX rats. Fentanyl withdrawal was associated with a significant change in 15 plasma proteins including B‐factor, properdin (Cfb), apolipoprotein E (ApoE), complement 4, precursor (C4), C‐reactive protein (Crp), zinc‐alpha‐2‐glycoprotein precursor (Azgp1), and serine peptidase inhibitor 3L (Serinpa3l). The addition of E2 was associated with enhanced proteomic changes. Bioinformatic gene ontology enrichment analysis indicates that fentanyl withdrawal can disrupt the expression of proteins associated with immunity, lipid transport, and components of the extracellular matrix. We identify protein changes in plasma that may contribute to adverse health outcomes in females, with and without E2, during fentanyl withdrawal. These findings support the development of targeted strategies addressing health risks during opioid use disorder in women.

Keywords: addiction, estrogen, opioid, withdrawal, women's health

1. BACKGROUND

Despite higher rates of substance use disorder (SUD) and drug‐induced overdose deaths in men, 1 studies show that women have an accelerated course from initial drug use to meeting criteria for SUD and/or seeking treatment for the disorder, a phenomenon also known as the telescoping effect. 2 In addition, women experience more severe addiction‐related health effects including the development of drug‐associated diseases such as cirrhosis and hepatitis C. 3 Similar sex differences have been observed in laboratory animals with results showing that female rats develop an addiction‐like phenotype after less drug exposure, and exhibit withdrawal symptoms more rapidly than males. 4 In rats, this phenotype has been defined as the development of an enhanced motivation to obtain the drug, and an enhanced vulnerability to relapse. 5 , 6

Female rats exhibit a higher risk of developing severe adverse health consequences during fentanyl withdrawal, including prolonged weight loss, respiratory distress, and death, 7 , 8 but the biological mechanisms for this risk are not clear. Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid with high toxicity and risk to induce respiratory depression and overdose at relatively low doses. 9 Women are vulnerable to the toxic effects of fentanyl, with differences in fentanyl metabolism between males and females. 10 , 11 In addition, ovarian hormones such as estradiol (E2) have been found to mediate the addictive as well as the toxic effects of opioid drugs such as fentanyl. 11 , 12 , 13 Studies in OVX rats show that E2 loss diminishes drug self‐administration, including fentanyl, 7 , 8 and that E2 replacement facilitates the acquisition, escalation, and reinstatement of drug‐seeking behavior. 3 , 14 , 15 Changes in E2 are also known to modulate the expression of several opioid receptors in the brain contributing to peptide and dopamine release within the reward pathway. 16 , 17

Using an ovariectomized (OVX) rat model of opioid addiction with fentanyl, we recently showed that E2 supplementation accelerates the development of addiction‐like behaviors during extended‐access self‐administration, as measured by an increase in drug intake and drug‐seeking and motivation behavior. 8 E2 is also found to prolong the time‐course of physical dependence as measured by withdrawal‐induced weight loss and risk of developing adverse health effects that are observed during withdrawal. 8 To identify factors that may contribute to fentanyl withdrawal and its associated adverse health effects in females, we performed proteomic analyses of plasma obtained from OVX female rats with and without E2 replacement and compared them with the drug‐naïve OVX control. Plasma was collected during protracted withdrawal following extended‐access fentanyl self‐administration, when the risk of adverse health effects is heightened. 8 Samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography‐coupled electrospray ionization (LC‐ESI) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Our findings identify proteins that can contribute to the adverse health effects of drug use and withdrawal in females.

2. METHODS

2.1. Subjects

Adult OVX female Sprague–Dawley rats (n = 12) were purchased from Charles River Laboratory and arrived at our facility within 1 week of surgery. These animals were representative subsets of the Fentanyl+E2 (4 of 27) and Fentanyl alone (4 of 22) groups we used in our previous study on the impact of E2 on the development of addiction‐like features and adverse health effects. 8 The rats received either a subcutaneous injection of E2 (5 μg/0.1 mL/day; Fentanyl+E2) or an equal volume of vehicle (corn oil; Fentanyl) at the same time (11:00 a.m.) 5 days a week. 8 An additional cohort of vehicle‐treated OVX female rats (n = 4) given access to saline instead of fentanyl was used for comparison as drug‐naïve controls (Saline). All procedures were approved by the University of Virginia Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted within the guidelines set by the National Institutes of Health.

2.2. Plasma collection

The procedures used for housing, surgical implantation of jugular catheters, fentanyl self‐administration training, extended‐access fentanyl self‐administration, and cue‐induced relapse testing are thoroughly described in our previous study. 8 A 14‐day withdrawal period began following the last session wherein withdrawal‐induced changes in body weight relative to weight at the last session were assessed as a measure of general health and physical dependence. Trunk blood was collected the morning following the cue relapse test (between 10 a.m. and 12 p.m.) and separated into plasma and serum fractions as described. 18 , 19 Plasma was also collected from an additional cohort of OVX (Saline) rats that underwent similar procedures with training and extended access to saline instead of fentanyl.

2.3. Protein identification and quantification

Protein concentration for each plasma sample was determined using a Bradford assay, and treatment group samples for mass spectrometry analysis were created by aggregating an equal mass of protein from each plasma sample per condition similar to previous studies. 20 A total of 50 μg of protein for each experimental condition was prepared for mass spectrometry following a protocol for denaturing, reducing, and alkylating proteins in 8 M urea, 48 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 9 mM iodoacetamide, respectively, in ammonium bicarbonate. 21 Proteins were digested with trypsin at 37°C for 5 h, desalted with C18 ZipTip (Millipore), and then dehydrated in a SpeedVac and reconstituted in 0.1% formic acid before loading into the Exploris Orbitrap 480 equipped with an EASY‐nLC 1200 HPLC system (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Fragments were separated using a reverse‐phase PepMap RSLC 75 μm i.d. by 15 cm long with a 2 μm particle size C18 column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), eluted with 0.1% formic acid and 80% acetonitrile at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. Peptides were fragmented by high‐energy collisions (HCD). Enabled filters included EASY‐IC internal mass calibration, monoisotopic precursor selection, and dynamic exclusion (20 s). All mass spectrometry samples were run in triplicate.

Proteins were identified by comparing the resulting spectra to predicted spectra in the Rattus norvegicus NCBI 2017 database using Proteome Discoverer v2.5 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in data‐dependent acquisition (DDA). The mass tolerance for precursor ions was 5 parts per million (ppm) and the mass tolerance for fragment ions was set to 0.05 Da. The cutoff value for false discovery rate (FDR) was set to 1% for reporting peptide spectral matches (PSM). Proteins with 3 or more PSMs found in at least 2 of 3 replicates were analyzed. The average number of PSMs was used to create an abundance ratio between experimental groups: Fentanyl versus Saline; Fentanyl+E2 versus Saline; Fentanyl+E2 versus Fentanyl. A log2 transformed abundance ratio (fold‐change) was normalized using the equal median normalization method and assessed for significance with the bioconductor‐based DEqMS and Limma packages in the R Studio environment. 22 , 23 Proteins with a fold‐change of at least ±0.4 (log2 abundance ratio) and a p‐value <.05 were considered significant.

2.4. Data analysis

Repeated measures ANOVA was used to evaluate physical dependence, defined by changes in body weight over the 14‐day withdrawal period relative to pre‐withdrawal weights recorded on Day 1 following the final extended‐access session in the Fentanyl and Fentanyl+E2 groups. Saline controls were included to establish baseline (or “normal”) weight changes over this period. Within‐group one‐tailed t‐tests were conducted to determine if weight change significantly differed from the pre‐withdrawal baseline. Post‐hoc comparisons were Bonferroni‐corrected.

For proteomics analysis, the official gene symbols for the comprehensive set of significantly altered proteins from each comparison were uploaded to The Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING), and analyzed for functional enrichment. 24 Analyses against Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomics (KEGG) identified terms that are significantly enriched with the altered proteins found in each comparison. Official gene symbols for significantly altered proteins from each comparison were used as input for STRING.

3. RESULTS

3.1. An OVX rat model of fentanyl withdrawal for examining the physiological effects of E2

In this study, we used a recent OVX rat model of addiction with fentanyl that showed that E2 supplementation accelerates the development of addiction‐like behaviors, including escalated intake, enhanced drug‐seeking, and motivation for the drug. 8 This model is summarized in Figure 1A. We find that OVX rats on fentanyl with E2 supplementation (Fentanyl+E2) or fentanyl alone (Fentanyl) exhibited a time‐course of physical dependence as measured by withdrawal‐induced weight loss. Specifically, a significant impact of E2 supplementation on the time‐course of physical dependence (group effect, F 2,9 = 15.3, p < .001) was seen with the Fentanyl+E2 group exhibiting a prolonged course and failing to gain weight over the 14‐day withdrawal period compared with both the Fentanyl and Saline groups (p's < .01) (Figure 1B). Weight gain in the Fentanyl+E2 group remained below that of both the Fentanyl and Saline groups (p's < .05). We did not detect a change in fentanyl intake over the 10‐day extended‐access period across the Fentanyl and Fentanyl+E2 groups (Figure S1A). In addition, no significant group differences were observed for extinction or reinstatement responses, although 100% of the rats in the Fentanyl+E2 group (4 out of 4) reinstated responding compared with 75% in the Fentanyl group (3 out of 4) (Figure S1B).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Summary of the study for testing the impact of E2 on fentanyl withdrawal within OVX female rats. (A) OVX female rats with and without E2 replacement were trained to self‐administer fentanyl under a fixed‐ratio 1 schedule (FR train; 0.25 μg/kg/infusion). Following acquisition, rats were given extended, intermittent‐access to fentanyl (0.25 μg/kg/infusion; 24 h/day, 2, 5‐min trials/h) for 10 days. (B) Physical dependence defined by withdrawal‐induced weight loss, was evaluated over a 14‐day withdrawal period. Weight remained significantly lower in rats self‐administering fentanyl while receiving E2 supplementation (Fentanyl+E2) than those not receiving E2 (Fentanyl) (*p < .05). Significant difference from both the Fentanyl and Saline groups; (# p < .05). (C) 50 μg of plasma protein, collected after cue relapse, was analyzed using LC‐ESI MS/MS. Significantly altered proteins were identified using the abundance ratio of PSM and then bioinformatically analyzed in STRING. Multiple group comparisons were conducted across the datasets.

3.2. Proteomic analysis of plasma from an OVX rat model of fentanyl withdrawal with and without E2 supplementation

We conducted proteomic analysis from 3 experimental fentanyl withdrawal groups with 4 rats per group: (1) OVX Fentanyl+E2; (2) OVX Fentanyl; (3) drug‐naïve or no‐fentanyl saline controls (Saline) (Figure 1). The Fentanyl+E2 group did not display a significant change in fentanyl intake over the 10‐day extended‐access period compared with Fentanyl. However, Fentanyl+E2 was associated with prolonged weight loss during withdrawal days (2 [W2], 7 [W7] and 14 [W14]) relative to their weight at the start of the time of withdrawal. Statistical analysis confirms the effect of Fentanyl+E2 on weight loss relative to Fentanyl (interaction of group by day, F 2,12 = 8.7, p < .01; effect of group, F 1,6 = 13.8, p < .01) (Figure 1B). We did not detect a significant group difference in extinction or reinstatement responses, although 100% of the rats in the Fentanyl+E2 group reinstated responding compared with 75% of the Fentanyl group (Figure 1B).

We used a quantitative MS proteomic strategy based on an analysis of PSM abundance ratio as previously described to examine changes in plasma proteins. 21 , 25 These abundance ratios reflect changes in the quantity of the identified proteins as measured by their PSM between the conditions. Direct PSM abundance ratio comparisons were performed between plasma proteins obtained from Fentanyl versus Saline or Fentanyl+E2 versus Saline where the Saline group was used as the drug‐naïve control. In addition, we examined proteomics changes between Fentanyl+E2 versus Fentanyl conditions from OVX rats (Figure 1C). Quantitative analysis was conducted using label‐free LC/ESI‐MS/MSMS as shown. 26 A similar number of proteins were detected across all experimental conditions in the proteomic analysis. Specifically, we detected 442 total proteins within the Saline, 441 within the Fentanyl, and 536 within the Fentanyl+E2 plasma sample. Quantitative analyses of statistically significant proteins based on PSM measures revealed an effect of the drug condition on 15 proteins within the Fentanyl to Saline comparison (p < .05) (Figure 2A and Table 1). These significantly altered proteins included proteins associated with sepsis, such as B‐factor properdin (Cfb) and C‐reactive protein (Crp) (p < .05). 27 Proteomic analysis also identified various isoforms amongst some proteins including hemoglobin beta subunit proteins (Hbb) and apolipoprotein E (ApoE). These isoforms are identified by their unique NCBI accession numbers along with their associated peptides in the MS (Table S1). An analysis of altered proteins between Fentanyl+E2 and Saline conditions identified 30 altered proteins (p < .05). PSM analysis also showed that Fentanyl+E2 was overwhelmingly associated with a decrease in the number of plasma proteins (Figure 2B and Table 2). The Fentanyl+E2 condition was associated with a reduction in known plasma carrier proteins including apolipoprotein a1 (ApoA) and ceruloplasmin (Cp) (p < .05) known for their involvement in lipid homeostasis. 28 , 29 The Fentanyl+E2 condition, however, was associated with an increase in Hbb and Ambp (alpha 1 microglobulin/bikunin), Hp (haptoglobin) (p < .05). This finding is consistent with the effect of E2 on increased blood oxygen count. 30 , 31

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Proteomic results for Fentanyl and Fentanyl+E2 plasma fractions. (A) Volcano plot showing the distribution of significantly altered proteins within Fentanyl versus Saline. (B) Fentanyl+E2 versus Saline. (C) STRING enrichment analysis of terms associated with significantly altered proteins within the Fentanyl versus Saline. (D) Fentanyl+E2 versus Saline.

TABLE 1.

Significantly altered proteins in OVX rats from Fentanyl versus Saline conditions.

Gene symbol NCBI accession Description Fold change p‐value #Unique peptides
Cfb CAE83972.1 B‐factor, properdin 0.5774 3.20 × 10−3 52
C4 P08649.3 Complement C4 (precursor) 0.5385 1.89 × 10−2 20
Fn1 XP_006245214.1 PREDICTED: fibronectin isoform ×3 0.5088 2.20 × 10−3 56
Apoe EDM08152.1 Apolipoprotein E, isoform CRA_c 0.5014 4.72 × 10−2 50
IgG‐2a AAH91257.1 LOC367586 protein 0.4839 1.66 × 10−2 0
Fn1 XP_006245213.1 PREDICTED: fibronectin isoform ×2 0.4588 1.86 × 10−2 56
Crp AFA37859.1 C‐reactive protein 0.4396 4.29 × 10−2 4
Igh‐6 AAI03658.1 Igh‐6 protein, partial −0.4086 4.42 × 10−2 1
Serpina3l CAA34406.1 Serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 3 L −0.4719 2.84 × 10−2 6
Mug1 AAA40630.1 Alpha‐1‐inhibitor III precursor, partial −0.4964 3.41 × 10−2 6
Ambp EDM10533.1 Alpha 1 microglobulin/bikunin, isoform CRA_a −0.5206 2.87 × 10−2 17
Afm EDL88554.1 Afamin, isoform CRA_b −0.5353 1.59 × 10−2 39
Azgp1 Q63678.1 Zinc‐alpha‐2‐glycoprotein (precursor) −0.5373 3.03 × 10−2 14
Hrg l1 AAG28417.1 Histidine‐rich glycoprotein −0.6036 1.47 × 10−2 0
Lifr NP_112310.1 Leukemia inhibitory factor receptor precursor −0.8186 1.19 × 10−2 10

Note: Changes in individual proteins detected by MS analysis are shown as fold change (log2 of the abundance ratio measure between the conditions). A p‐value <.05 indicates statistical significance The number of unique peptides is the number of individual peptides associated with the protein.

TABLE 2.

Significantly altered proteins in OVX rats from Fentanyl+E2 versus Saline conditions.

Gene symbol NCBI accession Description Fold change p‐value #Unique peptides
Hp AAA41348.1 Haptoglobin (Hp) 0.7473 4.92 × 10−2 24
Hbb CAA33114.1 Beta‐globin 0.6339 1.33 × 10−2 4
Ambp XP_008761981.1 PREDICTED: protein AMBP isoform ×1 0.6122 4.60 × 10−2 17
Hbb NP_150237.1 Hemoglobin subunit beta‐1 0.4743 4.11 × 10−2 4
Hbb AAA41309.1 Major beta‐hemoglobin 0.4695 3.77 × 10−2 2
Afm EDL88554.1 Afamin, isoform CRA_b −0.4236 4.72 × 10−2 39
Apoe EDM08151.1 Apolipoprotein E, isoform CRA_b −0.4368 2.81 × 10−2 11
Fn1 AAA41167.1 Fibronectin 2, partial −0.45 4.19 × 10−2 19
Vtn AAB01090.1 Vitronectin −0.4509 3.36 × 10−2 15
A1bgl1 EDM16193.1 Similar to alpha 1B‐glycoprotein (predicted) −0.4877 4.21 × 10−2 9
Igh‐6 AAI03658.1 Igh‐6 protein, partial −0.5063 1.62 × 10−2 1
Ahsg EDL78057.1 Alpha‐2‐HS‐glycoprotein, isoform CRA_b −0.5089 2.19 × 10−2 6
Apoa1 NP_036870.1 Apolipoprotein A‐I preproprotein −0.5094 2.06 × 10−2 47
Cfh NP_569093.2 Complement factor H precursor −0.5128 2.96 × 10−2 3
Ambp EDM10533.1 Alpha 1 microglobulin/bikunin, isoform CRA_a −0.5216 2.84 × 10−2 17
Vtn AAP85374.1 Vitronectin (Aa1018) −0.5337 3.80 × 10−2 15
Ahsg AAP92571.1 Alpha‐2‐HS‐glycoprotein (Aa2‐066) −0.5677 2.00 × 10−3 16
Mug1 AAA40630.1 Alpha‐1‐inhibitor III precursor, partial −0.5688 1.77 × 10−2 17
Serpina3n CAA31548.1 Contrapsin C‐term. (217 AA), partial −0.5751 3.25 × 10−2 9
Cfb NP_997631.2 Complement factor B precursor −0.5779 1.20 × 10−3 52
Azgp1 XP_006249065.1 PREDICTED: zinc‐alpha‐2‐glycoprotein isoform ×1 −0.5845 9.10 × 10−3 14
Hbbl1 CAA34440.1 Protein product of hemoglobin subunit beta like 1 −0.5927 3.31 × 10−2 7
Fn1 AAA41168.1 Fibronectin 3, partial −0.6162 2.23 × 10−2 18
Azgp1 Q63678.1 Zinc‐alpha‐2‐glycoprotein (precursor) −0.6189 1.50 × 10−2 14
Serpina3l CAA34406.1 Serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 3 L −0.6356 5.50 × 10−3 6
Ambp NP_037033.1 Protein AMBP precursor −0.6524 1.99 × 10−2 20
Lifr NP_112310.1 Leukemia inhibitory factor receptor precursor −0.6735 3.20 × 10−2 10
Cp AAA40915.1 Ceruloplasmin, partial −0.7111 2.30 × 10−2 3
Cp EDM01073.1 Ceruloplasmin, isoform CRA_c −0.7504 7.00 × 10−4 36
Hrg l1 NP_001316829.1 Similar to histidine‐rich glycoprotein precursor −0.854 3.42 × 10−2 8

Note: Changes in individual proteins detected by MS analysis are shown as fold change (log2 of the abundance ratio measure between the conditions). A p‐value <.05 indicates statistical significance The number of unique peptides is the number of individual peptides associated with the protein.

To gain insight into the biological implications of these proteomic findings, we explored the function of significantly altered proteins within both the Fentanyl and Fentanyl+E2 conditions. We used the STRING database of known and predicted information on physical and functional associations between proteins and signaling networks. 24 We performed an enrichment analysis against Gene ontology (GO) and KEGG databases within STRING. 24 , 32 Enrichment analysis was first conducted on significantly altered proteins within the Fentanyl condition relative to the Saline. Our results show an effect of fentanyl on immune responses, including the complement cascade and lipoprotein regulation (Figure 2C). An enrichment analysis was also conducted on the Fentanyl+E2 proteomic dataset. As shown in Figure 2D, these data reveal an enrichment of proteins involved in the regulation of lipid synthesis and transport as well as immune responses. Our findings suggest that E2 increases the expression of immunity markers during fentanyl withdrawal. Our analysis of plasma proteins from the Fentanyl+E2 condition also reveals a modification in the expression of proteins that contribute to interactions between cells and their extracellular environment including heparan sulfate proteoglycan and glycosaminoglycan‐binding proteins such as vitronectin (Vtn) and fibronectin (Fn1).

A comparison of significantly altered proteins within Fentanyl and Fentanyl+E2 conditions, each relative to Saline, is presented in Figure 3. This heatmap shows changes in the expression of proteins across the two proteomic datasets and highlights the area of overlap between them. Specifically, we find that 7 proteins are significantly altered in Fentanyl as well as Fentanyl+E2 proteomes (p < .05). These proteins are leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (Lifr), zinc‐alpha2‐glycoprotein (Azgp1), serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 3 L (Serpina3l), afamin isoform CRA_b (Afm), immunoglobulin heavy chain 6 (Igh‐6), alpha1 microglobulin/bikunin isoform CRA_a (Ambp) and alpha‐1‐inhibitor III precursor (Mug1). An analysis shows that these 7 proteins are decreased in their expression within the Fentanyl and Fentanyl+E2 plasma fractions relative to the Saline condition (p < .05).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

A heatmap showing fold‐changes in protein expression for proteins that are significantly altered within Fentanyl versus Saline and Fentanyl+E2 versus Saline comparisons. Common proteins between the two comparisons are boxed in yellow.

3.3. A comparison of plasma proteomes between Fentanyl+E2 and fentanyl conditions in OVX rats

To further explore the specific impact of E2 supplementation on fentanyl withdrawal within the plasma proteome, we calculated PSM abundance ratios comparing Fentanyl+E2 and Fentanyl proteome datasets. Significantly altered proteins between Fentanyl+E2 and Fentanyl groups are presented in Table 3 and Figure 4. The volcano plot clearly shows that E2 supplementation is associated with a decrease in plasma proteins within the 18 significantly altered proteins identified within the dataset (Figure 4A). Bioinformatic analysis of these 18 proteins using STRING indicates enrichment in enzymatic activity (kininogen 2‐like 1 [Kng2l1], serine protease inhibitors 1 and 3n [Serpina1 and Serpina3n], alpha‐2 HS glycoprotein [Ahsg]), and in hormone as well as immune system function including acute‐phase responses and complement and coagulation cascades (Figure 4B). These results provide information on potential mechanisms underlying E2‐mediated effect during fentanyl withdrawal, and suggest a role for glycoprotein and lipid processes in adverse health effects in females.

TABLE 3.

Significantly altered proteins in OVX rats from Fentanyl+E2 versus Fentanyl conditions.

Gene symbol NCBI accession Description Fold change p‐value #Unique peptides
Acta1 EDL96714.1 Actin, alpha 1, skeletal muscle, isoform CRA_a −0.4094 3.69 × 10−2 7
Fn1 XP_006245214.1 PREDICTED: fibronectin isoform ×3 −0.4391 6.10 × 10−3 56
Apoa1 NP_036870.1 Apolipoprotein A‐I preproprotein −0.4446 3.87 × 10−2 47
Cp EDM01073.1 Ceruloplasmin, isoform CRA_c −0.447 2.07 × 10−2 36
A1i3 P14046.1 Alpha‐1‐inhibitor 3 precursor −0.4655 1.90 × 10−3 32
Fn1 AAA41167.1 Fibronectin 2, partial −0.4749 3.32 × 10−2 19
Apoa1 CAA25224.1 Preproapolipoprotein A‐I −0.5185 1.58 × 10−2 42
Gc AAA41082.1 Vitamin D‐binding protein precursor −0.5252 8.00 × 10−4 59
Gc NP_036696.2 Vitamin D‐binding protein precursor −0.5422 1.30 × 10−3 60
Igll2 ABD65265.1 Immunoglobulin lambda light chain, partial −0.5572 2.84 × 10−2 2
Serpina3n CAA31548.1 Contrapsin C‐term. (217 AA), partial −0.5658 3.50 × 10−2 9
Cfb CAE83972.1 B‐factor, properdin −0.6204 1.90 × 10−3 52
Igll2 ABD65264.1 Immunoglobulin lambda light chain, partial −0.6503 9.80 × 10−3 1
Ahsg AAP92571.1 Aa2‐066 −0.6515 7.00 × 10−4 16
Hbbl1 CAA34440.1 Protein product of hemoglobin subunit beta like 1 gene −0.6702 1.83 × 10−2 7
Kng2l1 AAA41484.1 LMW K‐kininogen I precursor (AA at 138), partial −0.7056 4.60 × 10−3 2
Serpina1 BAA00579.1 Protein product of serpin family A member 1 gene −0.8655 1.02 × 10−2 10
Crp AFA37866.1 CRP −0.9026 2.60 × 10−3 5

Note: Changes in individual proteins detected by MS analysis are shown as fold change (log2 of the abundance ratio measure between the conditions). A p‐value <.05 indicates statistical significance The number of unique peptides is the number of individual peptides associated with the protein.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

A comparison of Fentanyl+E2 and Fentanyl plasma proteomes. (A) Volcano plot showing the distribution of significantly altered proteins within Fentanyl+E2 and Fentanyl proteomes. (B) STRING enrichment analysis of terms associated with significantly altered proteins within Fentanyl+E2 and Fentanyl proteomes.

4. DISCUSSION

A goal of this study was to identify potential indicators of E2‐augmented toxicity during fentanyl withdrawal using OVX rats. E2 has known effects on the opioid system including the stimulation of endogenous opioid production (endorphins, enkephalins, and dynorphins), and the modulation of opioid receptor expression as well as signaling. 33 , 34 , 35 For example, E2 treatment in OVX rodent models is shown to alter μ‐opioid receptor expression and internalization in the brain. 17 , 36 , 37 In addition, opioid receptors are expressed in immune cells 38 , 39 and interactions between E2 and opioid receptors can contribute to inflammatory conditions during cardiovascular disease. 35 , 40 , 41 Our work highlights proteome responses to fentanyl withdrawal, and its potential for toxicity in females taking into account the role of E2 on adverse health effects including weight. 42 Our findings may help explain why females exhibit more severe withdrawal effects. 8

Proteomic findings in this study  provide mechanistic information on interactions between E2 and fentanyl during withdrawal. A schematic in Figure 5 based on our proteomic findings highlights the potential for modifications amongst several interacting homeostatic systems involving glycoprotein activity, lipid transport, metabolism, and immune responses. We hypothesize that these proteomic changes reflect drug‐related modifications within multiple organs including the liver, brain, and immune cells such as lymphocytes, mast cells, and macrophages that are known to involve the function of the identified plasma proteins. Our results show that the composition of the plasma proteome can differ in OVX rats that are exposed to fentanyl with or without E2 supplementation. These findings are consistent with data showing that E2 supplementation potentiates markers of adverse health effects during fentanyl withdrawal, including weight loss and respiratory distress. 8

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

A schematic summary of proteomic findings showing an effect of fentanyl and E2 on primary pathways of immune system signaling and cellular regulation in the rat model.

4.1. Complement system and immune regulation

Exogenous opioids such as morphine and fentanyl have been found to impair the function of macrophages, natural killer cells, and T‐cells, and to weaken the gut barrier in vitro and in animal studies. The complement system (CS) includes more than 30 plasma proteins that provide defense against infection and remove toxic materials. 43 Inherited CS deficiencies predispose individuals to bacterial infection and/or immune complex disease. Complement activation has been shown to be involved in morphine tolerance and withdrawal‐induced hyperalgesia in rodents. 44 For example, the administration of complement protein C5a into rats was found to promote hyperalgesia and the expression of spinal antinociceptive tolerance to intrathecal morphine. 45 Our study shows that complement proteins Cfb (B‐factor, properdin) and complement factor 4 (C4) are increased in OVX female rats during protracted withdrawal from fentanyl self‐administration (Fentanyl) suggestive of inflammation. In contrast, Cfb and Cfh are decreased in rats that receive E2 supplementation, suggesting that E2 may reverse the inflammatory effect during fentanyl withdrawal. The promotion of CS activity by a protein such as properdin may drive important changes in immune responses including cytokine production that can cause tissue damage. 46 , 47 Our findings suggest that E2 replacement modifies fentanyl withdrawal‐associated CS activation, a finding that is consistent with the impact of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on women's immune function. 48 , 49 Interactions between E2 and fentanyl may modify CS immune responses in a manner that merits further study in both humans and animal models.

Additionally, our results demonstrate a significant increase in the expression of the immune system regulator C‐reactive protein (CRP) during withdrawal from fentanyl self‐administration. This fentanyl withdrawal effect on CRP was not observed in E2‐treated OVX rats, suggesting that E2 offsets the effect of fentanyl withdrawal on this protein. CRP is mostly synthesized in liver hepatocytes but is also made within muscle cells, macrophages, lymphocytes, and adipocytes. 50 , 51 , 52 CRP is shown to bind to lysophosphatidylcholine on the surface of dead or dying cells and can activate the CS. Interestingly, HRT has also been shown to influence circulating levels of CRP within women, and CRP blood concentrations have been used as markers of infection, cardiovascular disease, and immune responses. 53 , 54 These processes may contribute to higher morbidity rates in earlier studies of fentanyl effect on rats in the presence of E2. 8

E2 supplementation was found to shift the expression of fibronectin within the plasma from being increased within the Fentanyl group to being decreased within the Fentanyl+E2 group. Fibronectin is a glycoprotein that is a critical component of the extracellular matrix and participates in cell structure and motility. 55 Plasma fibronectin levels have been shown to correlate with immune signaling responses in various addiction models including alcoholic liver disease. 55 , 56 Our proteomic analysis highlights an effect of fentanyl and E2 on fibronectin expression. Similarly, proteomic analysis underscores the interactive effect of Fentanyl+E2 on the protein Serpina1 (aka alpha‐1 antitrypsin), which is a serine protease inhibitor (serpin) that participates in the control of various enzymes including digestive enzymes as well as white blood cell inflammatory regulators such as neutrophil elastase. 57

4.2. Glycoprotein and lipid regulation

Our results point to molecular changes that highlight interactions between fentanyl and E2 within the plasma glycoproteome. Notably, we find changes in proteins that are involved in sugar‐based signaling in various cell types including immune cells. For example, our proteomic results indicate an effect of Fentanyl+E2 on glycosaminoglycan and heparan sulfate proteoglycan‐binding proteins. Cell surface glycosylation is important for the proper function of innate and adaptive immune responses and plays a crucial role in CS activity, 58 , 59 which is found to be modified within our proteomic data. Various drugs of abuse, including alcohol and opioids, have been shown to modify glycosylation in various cell types through changes in the expression of glycosylation‐regulating enzymes and binding proteins, as well as the elimination of glycoconjugates in the extracellular environment. 60 , 61 Such glycoproteins that were found to be modified by Fentanyl in our study include histidine‐rich glycoprotein (Hrg l1) and zinc alpha 2 glycoprotein (Azgp1), which are important in lipid metabolism and the regulation of body weight. 62 , 63 Changes in protein glycosylation are also implicated in cancer, cardiovascular disease, and respiratory as well as metabolic conditions. 64 , 65 , 66

Apolipoproteins (Apo) have been shown to carry fentanyl in blood. 67 Our proteomic analysis indicates that fentanyl modifies the expression of multiple Apo proteins that seem to be differentially impacted when fentanyl is administered alone or in combination with E2. Specifically, ApoA and ApoE (isoform CRA_b) are found to be significantly decreased in the Fentanyl+E2 group, while in Fentanyl alone we find that ApoE level (isoform CRA_c) is increased. These two rat ApoE isoforms appear to differ by 172 amino acids, but nothing is known about functional differences between them. ApoE is a conserved mammalian lipoprotein involved in lipid homeostasis and cholesterol transport through the regulation of phospholipid cholesteryl and ester triacylglycerol (TAG) transport across the cell membrane. 68 , 69 It is primarily synthesized in the liver and in circulating macrophages, but is also found in glia within the brain and spinal cord where it has been shown to participate in neuron survival and health. 70 These changes in ApoE within our study suggest an important interaction between E2 and fentanyl in lipid transport and signaling within various systems including nervous tissue and immune cells.

5. CONCLUSION

Interactions between fentanyl and the immune system are documented in the literature and shown to impact inflammatory regulation during pain responses in humans and rodent models. 71 , 72 These studies, however, are largely conducted in male rodents with less known on the effects of fentanyl in females. Our proteomic analysis begins to address this discrepancy by identifying proteins and pathways that are impacted by fentanyl withdrawal in OVX females with and without E2 replacement based on our recently developed rat model. 8 Thus while the current analysis is based on the detection of proteins within plasma future studies can extend this by assessing changes in effected organ systems inlcuding brain and spinal cord and provide. insight for the development of clinical interventions for opioid use disorder.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Patricia Sinclair: Conceptualization; methodology; investigation; formal analysis; data curation; writing – review and editing. Navdeep S. Dhanjal: Conceptualization; methodology; investigation; formal analysis; data curation. E. Blair Towers: Investigation; methodology. Dr. Wendy Lynch: Conceptualization; formal analysis; writing – review and editing; project administration; resources. Nadine Kabbani: Conceptualization; formal analysis; writing – review and editing; project administration; resources.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

PEER REVIEW

The peer review history for this article is available at https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer‐review/10.1111/jne.70033.

Supporting information

Data S1. Supporting information.

JNE-37-e70033-s001.docx (58.7KB, docx)

Sinclair P, Dhanjal NS, Towers EB, Lynch WJ, Kabbani N. Proteomic analysis of plasma proteins during fentanyl withdrawal in ovariectomized female rats with and without estradiol. J Neuroendocrinol. 2025;37(8):e70033. doi: 10.1111/jne.70033

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ahmad F, Cisewski J, Rossen L, Sutton P. Products – Vital Statistics Rapid Release – Provisional Drug Overdose Data. 2024. Accessed August 6, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/drug-overdose-data.htm
  • 2. Piazza NJ, Vrbka JL, Yeager RD. Telescoping of alcoholism in women alcoholics. Intern J Addic. 1989;24:19‐28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Towers EB, Williams IL, Qillawala EI, Rissman EF, Lynch WJ. Sex/gender differences in the time‐course for the development of substance use disorder: a focus on the telescoping effect. Pharmacol Rev. 2023c;75:217‐249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Towers EB, Bakhti‐Suroosh A, Lynch WJ. Females develop features of an addiction‐like phenotype sooner during withdrawal than males. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021;238:2213‐2224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Carroll ME, Lynch WJ, Roth ME, Morgan AD, Cosgrove KP. Sex and estrogen influence drug abuse. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2004;25:273‐279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lynch WJ. Modeling the development of drug addiction in male and female animals. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2018;164:50‐61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lynch WJ, Roth ME, Mickelberg JL, Carroll ME. Role of estrogen in the acquisition of intravenously self‐administered cocaine in female rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001;68:641‐646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Towers EB, Setaro B, Lynch WJ. Estradiol enhances the development of addition‐like features in a female rat model of opioid use disorder. Neuroendocrinology. 2023a;113:1099. https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/529997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kelly E, Sutcliffe K, Cavallo D, Ramos‐Gonzalez N, Alhosan N, Henderson G. The anomalous pharmacology of fentanyl. Br J Pharmacol. 2023;180:797‐812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Marchette RCN, Carlson ER, Frye EV, et al. Heroin‐ and fentanyl‐induced respiratory depression in a rat plethysmography model: potency, tolerance, and sex differences. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2023;385:117‐134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Moody DE, Fang WB, Morrison J, McCance‐Katz E. Gender differences in pharmacokinetics of maintenance dosed buprenorphine. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;118:479‐483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Silva SM, Santos‐Marques MJ, Madeira MD. Sexually dimorphic response of the hypothalamo‐pituitary‐adrenal axis to chronic alcohol consumption and withdrawal. Brain Res. 2009;1303:61‐73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sinha R, Fox H, Hong K‐I, Sofuoglu M, Morgan PT, Bergquist KT. Sex steroid hormones, stress response, and drug craving in cocaine‐dependent women: implications for relapse susceptibility. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;15:445‐452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Towers EB, Williams IL, Qillawala EI, Lynch WJ. Role of nucleus accumbens dopamine 2 receptors in motivating cocaine use in male and female rats prior to and following the development of an addiction‐like phenotype. Front Pharmacol. 2023b;14:1237990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yoest KE, Cummings JA, Becker JB. Oestradiol influences on dopamine release from the nucleus accumbens shell: sex differences and the role of selective oestradiol receptor subtypes. Br J Pharmacol. 2019;176:4136‐4148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Brown LL, Pasi S, Etgen AM. Estrogen regulation of mu opioid receptor density in hypothalamic premammillary nuclei. Brain Res. 1996;742:347‐351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Joshi D, Billiar RB, Miller MM. Modulation of hypothalamic mu‐opioid receptor density by estrogen: a quantitative autoradiographic study of the female C57BL/6J mouse. Brain Res Bull. 1993;30:629‐634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lynch WJ. Acquisition and maintenance of cocaine self‐administration in adolescent rats: effects of sex and gonadal hormones. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008;197:237‐246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Lynch WJ. Sex and ovarian hormones influence vulnerability and motivation for nicotine during adolescence in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009;94:43‐50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Santos‐González M, López‐Miranda J, Pérez‐Jiménez F, Navas P, Villalba JM. Dietary oil modifies the plasma proteome during aging in the rat. Age (Dordr). 2012;34:341‐358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sinclair P, Kabbani N. Nicotinic receptor components of amyloid beta 42 proteome regulation in human neural cells Araki W, ed. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0270479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA‐sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zhu Y. DEqMS. 2018. Accessed April 9, 2024. https://bioconductor.org/packages/DEqMS
  • 24. Szklarczyk D, Kirsch R, Koutrouli M, et al. The STRING database in 2023: protein–protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D638‐D646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Zhou W, Liotta LA, Petricoin EF. The spectra count label‐free quantitation in cancer proteomics. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2012;9:135‐142. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hanna R, Graur A, Sinclair P, et al. Proteomic Analysis of Dorsal Root Ganglia in a Mouse Model of Paclitaxel‐Induced Neuropathic Pain. 2024. Accessed August 7, 2024. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.20.599888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 27. Charchaflieh J, Rushbrook J, Worah S, Zhang M. Activated complement factors as disease markers for sepsis. Dis Markers. 2015;2015:382463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Muscella A, Stefàno E, Marsigliante S. The effects of exercise training on lipid metabolism and coronary heart disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020;319:H76‐H88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Raia S, Conti A, Zanardi A, et al. Ceruloplasmin‐deficient mice show dysregulation of lipid metabolism in liver and adipose tissue reduced by a protein replacement. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Evans W, Phernetton TM, Magness RR. 17β‐estradiol effect on critical cardiac output with reduction of cardiac output in oophorectomized sheep. Am J Physiol Heart Circul Physiol. 1998;275:H57‐H64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Mercuro G, Saiu F, Deidda M, Mercuro S, Vitale C, Rosano GMC. Effect of hormone therapy on exercise capacity in early postmenopausal women. Obstetr Gynecol. 2007;110:780‐787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Sinclair P, Hakeem J, Kumar SG, et al. Proteomic responses in the human dopaminergic LUHMES cell line to imidacloprid and its metabolites imidacloprid‐olefin and desnitro‐imidacloprid. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2023;194:105473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Bagley EE, Ingram SL. Endogenous opioid peptides in the descending pain modulatory circuit. Neuropharmacology. 2020;173:108131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Long N, Serey C, Sinchak K. 17β‐estradiol rapidly facilitates lordosis through G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER) via deactivation of medial preoptic nucleus μ‐opioid receptors in estradiol primed female rats. Horm Behav. 2014;66:663‐666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Williams TJ, Mitterling KL, Thompson LI, et al. Age‐ and hormone‐regulation of opioid peptides and synaptic proteins in the rat dorsal hippocampal formation. Brain Res. 2011;1379:71‐85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Eckersell CB, Popper P, Micevych PE. Estrogen‐induced alteration of mu‐opioid receptor immunoreactivity in the medial preoptic nucleus and medial amygdala. J Neurosci. 1998;18:3967‐3976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Micevych PE, Rissman EF, Gustafsson J‐A, Sinchak K. Estrogen receptor‐alpha is required for estrogen‐induced mu‐opioid receptor internalization. J Neurosci Res. 2003;71:802‐810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Cechova K, Hlouskova M, Javorkova E, et al. Up‐regulation of μ‐, δ‐ and κ‐opioid receptors in concanavalin A‐stimulated rat spleen lymphocytes. J Neuroimmunol. 2018;321:12‐23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Raffaeli W, Malafoglia V, Bonci A, et al. Identification of MOR‐positive B cell as possible innovative biomarker (mu lympho‐marker) for chronic pain diagnosis in patients with fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:1499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Ceccarelli I, Fiorenzani P, Grasso G, et al. Estrogen and μ‐opioid receptor antagonists counteract the 17β‐estradiol‐induced licking increase and interferon‐γ reduction occurring during the formalin test in male rats. Pain. 2004;111:181‐190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Li G, Cheng G, Wu J, Zhou X, Liu P, Sun C. Drug‐induced Long QT syndrome in women. Adv Ther. 2013;30:793‐802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Moran‐Santa Maria MM, Flanagan J, Brady K. Ovarian hormones and drug abuse. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014;16:511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Zelek WM. Measuring Total classical pathway and activities of individual components of the mouse complement pathway. Bio Protoc. 2021;11(19):e4175. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Shutov LP, Warwick CA, Shi X, et al. The complement system component C5a produces thermal hyperalgesia via macrophage‐to‐nociceptor signaling that requires NGF and TRPV1. J Neurosci. 2016;36:5055‐5070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Li Y‐H, Jin H, Xu J‐S, Guo G‐Q, Chen D‐L, Bo Y. Complement factor C5a and C5a receptor contribute to morphine tolerance and withdrawal‐induced hyperalgesia in rats. Exp Ther Med. 2012;4:723‐727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Alcorlo M, Tortajada A, Rodríguez de Córdoba S, Llorca O. Structural basis for the stabilization of the complement alternative pathway C3 convertase by properdin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:13504‐13509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Jain U, Cao Q, Thomas NA, et al. Properdin provides protection from Citrobacter rodentium –induced intestinal inflammation in a C5a/IL‐6–dependent manner. J Immunol. 2015;194(7):3414‐3421. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Kumwenda P, Cottier F, Hendry AC, et al. Estrogen promotes innate immune evasion of Candida albicans through inactivation of the alternative complement system. Cell Rep. 2022;38:110183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Yilmazer M, Fenkci V, Fenkci S, Aktepe O, Sonmezer M, Kurtay G. Association of serum complement (C3, C4) and immunoglobulin (IgG, IgM) levels with hormone replacement therapy in healthy post‐menopausal women. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1531‐1535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Chen J‐Y, Zhu X‐L, Liu W‐H, et al. C‐reactive protein derived from perivascular adipose tissue accelerates injury‐induced neointimal hyperplasia. J Transl Med. 2020;18:68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Jialal I, Devaraj S, Venugopal SK. C‐reactive protein: risk marker or mediator in atherothrombosis? Hypertension. 2004;44:6‐11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Kuta AE, Baum LL. C‐reactive protein is produced by a small number of normal human peripheral blood lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1986;164:321‐326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Kurtz EG, Ridker PM, Rose LM, et al. Oral postmenopausal hormone therapy, C‐reactive protein, and cardiovascular outcomes. Menopause. 2011;18:23‐29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Sahu BR, Kampa RK, Padhi A, Panda AK. C‐reactive protein: a promising biomarker for poor prognosis in COVID‐19 infection. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;509:91‐94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Aziz‐Seible RS. Cellular fibronectin stimulates hepatocytes to produce factors that promote alcohol‐induced liver injury. WJH. 2011;3:45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Itoi S, Takahashi N, Saito H, et al. Myeloid immune checkpoint ILT3/LILRB4/gp49B can co‐tether fibronectin with integrin on macrophages. Int Immunol. 2022;34:435‐444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Mansuy‐Aubert V, Zhou QL, Xie X, et al. Imbalance between neutrophil elastase and its inhibitor α1‐antitrypsin in obesity alters insulin sensitivity, inflammation, and energy expenditure. Cell Metab. 2013;17:534‐548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Pinho SS, Alves I, Gaifem J, Rabinovich GA. Immune regulatory networks coordinated by glycans and glycan‐binding proteins in autoimmunity and infection. Cell Mol Immunol. 2023;20:1101‐1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Van Kooyk Y, Rabinovich GA. Protein‐glycan interactions in the control of innate and adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:593‐601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Azzoni L, Giron LB, Vadrevu S, et al. Methadone use is associated with increased levels of sCD14, immune activation, and inflammation during suppressed HIV infection. J Leukoc Biol. 2022;112:733‐744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Waszkiewicz N, Szajda SD, Kępka A, Szulc A, Zwierz K. Glycoconjugates in the detection of alcohol abuse. Biochem Soc Trans. 2011;39:365‐369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Chan GC‐K, Than WH, Kwan BC‐H, et al. Adipose and serum zinc alpha‐2‐glycoprotein (ZAG) expressions predict longitudinal change of adiposity, wasting and predict survival in dialysis patients. Sci Rep. 2022;12:9087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Huscher D, Ebert N, Soerensen‐Zender I, Mielke N, Schaeffner E, Schmitt R. Development of a prediction model for mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in older adults taking into account AZGP1. Sci Rep. 2021;11:11792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Abou Hassan FF, Bou Hamdan MA, El Asmar K, Mokhbat JE, Melhem NM. Trends & predictors of non‐AIDS comorbidities among people living with HIV and receiving antiretroviral therapy in Lebanon. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101:e29162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Cymerys M, Bogdański P, Pupek‐Musialik D, et al. Influence of hypertension, obesity and nicotine abuse on quantitative and qualitative changes in acute‐phase proteins in patients with essential hypertension. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18:CR330‐CR336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Galligan JJ, Fritz KS, Tipney H, et al. Profiling impaired hepatic endoplasmic reticulum glycosylation as a consequence of ethanol ingestion. J Proteome Res. 2011;10:1837‐1847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Bednarek R, Luzak B, Golański J, Boncler M. Interactions of fentanyl with blood platelets and plasma proteins: platelet sensitivity to prasugrel metabolite is not affected by fentanyl under in vitro conditions. Pharmacol Rep. 2023;75:423‐441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Mahley RW, Huang Y. Apolipoprotein E: from atherosclerosis to Alzheimer's disease and beyond. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1999;10:207‐217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Mahley RW, Rall SC. Apolipoprotein E: far more Than a lipid transport protein. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2000;1:507‐537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Bu G. Apolipoprotein E and its receptors in Alzheimer's disease: pathways, pathogenesis and therapy. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:333‐344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Ezeomah C, Cunningham KA, Stutz SJ, et al. Fentanyl self‐administration impacts brain immune responses in male Sprague‐Dawley rats. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:725‐738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Ma K, Ma P, Lu H, Liu S, Cao Q. Fentanyl suppresses the survival of CD4+ T cells isolated from human umbilical cord blood through inhibition of IKKs‐mediated NF‐κB activation. Scand J Immunol. 2017;85:343‐349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data S1. Supporting information.

JNE-37-e70033-s001.docx (58.7KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.


Articles from Journal of Neuroendocrinology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES