Abstract
Oxytropis monophylla belongs to the genus Oxytropis of the family Fabaceae, and is an ecologically significant species, as it plays a vital role in desertification control. However, the chloroplast genome of O. monophylla remains unreported. Here, we constructed a high-quality chloroplast (cp) genome assembly for O. monophylla using NOVOPlasty and Illumina sequencing data. The results showed that the O. monophylla cp genome exhibited atypical structural characteristics due to the absence of an IR region. The chloroplast genome was 122,413 bp long with a GC content of 34.2%, encoding 108 complete genes. Phylogenetic reconstruction through both maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods resolved 12 Oxytropis species into two strongly supported clades (BS, PP =100%, 1). The O. monophylla and O. bicolor formed a monophyletic group, indicates a close relationship between the two species. The first chloroplast genome of O. monophylla establishes a good foundation for further genetic and genomic studies of the Oxytropis genus.
Keywords: Oxytropis monophylla, Fabaceae, chloroplast genome, inverted repeat regions loss, phylogenetic analysis
1. Introduction
Chloroplast are essential organelles that are central participants in plant cells and involved in photo-synthesis and carbon fixation (Li et al. 2015; Hollingsworth et al. 2016). In most plants, the chloroplast genome is inherited, unlike the nuclear genome, which facilitates the inference of species delimitation, genetic diversity, and evolution (Zhang et al. 2012; Daniell et al. 2016; Guo et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2018; Xie et al. 2022; Ran et al. 2024). Recent advancements in sequencing technology have enabled the publication of numerous chloroplast genomes across various plant taxa, enabling large-scale comparative analyses across diverse plant lineages (Hu et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2022).
Oxytropis monophylla Grubov (Grubov 1978) belongs to the genus Oxytropis of the family Fabaceae, is a perennial herbaceous species endemic to semi-desert regions of Ningxia and Inner Mongolia in northern China (Malyshev 2008; Zhu et al. 2010). As an ecologically significant species, it plays a vital role in desertification control through its remarkable sand-binding capacity, attributed to its well-developed root system and robust vegetative propagation (Wang et al. 2021). In addition to ecological services, O. monophylla also plays an important role as a feed resources. Recent studies reveal its high nutritional value, containing 15%–18% protein and substantial fiber content, making it a preferred early spring feed for ruminants in arid regions (Li et al. 2015; Bei et al. 2022). Despite these important attributes, the species remains understudied compared to other Fabaceae members. In particular, the chloroplast genome of O. monophylla remains unreported.
In this study, we assembled and analyzed the complete chloroplast genome of O. monophylla for the first time. Our aims were (1) to characterize the structural features of the CPGs for the O. monophylla, and (2) to resolve the evolutionary relationships of O. monophylla, and to provide data support for the species identification and phylogenetic relationship of Oxytropis.
2. Materials
Healthy fresh leaves of O. monophylla were collected from Bayanhot of Alxa Left Banner (Alxa League, Inner Mongolia, China; coordinates: 105.9058E, 38.9738 N) (by Chaopan Zhang: 3024891762@qq.com) (Figure 1), and immediately desiccated using silica gel. Whole plants with reproductive structures (flowers or fruits) were additionally collected for voucher specimen preparation. The voucher specimen (accession number: zlnmu2023047) was deposited in the Herbarium of North Minzu University.
Figure 1.
The photos of O. monophylla (photographed by Chaopan Zhang). (A) Whole plant and flowers. (B) Whole plant and fruits. (C) Herbarium of O. monophylla (petiole 0.5–1 cm; legume sessile, pubescent, ovoid).
3. Methods
Total genomic DNA was isolated with a modified CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle 1987). Sequencing libraries were prepared with the NEBNext DNA Library Kit, during which genomic DNA was fragmented into 350 bp. High-throughput sequencing was subsequently carried out on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform with 150 bp paired-end read length. We acquired 6.2 GB of high-quality data after adapter trimming.
For chloroplast genome assembly, the de novo assembly was implemented in NOVOPlasty 4.3 (Dierckxsens et al. 2017) with the specified parameters: k-mer = 39 and genome range 120,000–200,000 bp, using the complete chloroplast genome of Oxytropis hirta (PP836294) as a reference. Genome annotation was executed through Plann v1.1 (Huang and Cronk 2015) with subsequent manual verification in Geneious v11.0.3 (Kearse et al. 2012). Sequencing depth analysis was quantified using Samtools (Li et al. 2009).
To establish the phylogenetic placement of O. monophylla in Oxytropis, the chloroplast genomes of 12 representative species were retrieved from NCBI GenBank to reconstruct the chloroplast genome phylogenetic tree, with Alhagi sparsifolia serving as an outgroup. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using MAFFT v.7.313 (Katoh and Standley 2013). Phylogenetic reconstruction employed both Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) approaches: ML analysis was conducted in RAxML v8.1.24 (Stamatakis 2014) under the GTR + Γ model, while BI analysis in Mrbayes v 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012) utilized the GTR+I + G model selected through jModeltest. Final phylogenetic trees were visualized using FigTree v1.4.2 (Rambaut 2012).
4. Results
Following quality filtering and preprocessing, we obtained at least 3.6 gigabases (Gb) of whole-genome sequencing data, which were retained. These clean reads were used to assemble high-quality chloroplast genomes through a reference-guided approach. The total chloroplast genome of O. monophylla (PV240322) was 122,413 bp long, with sequencing depth analysis revealing maximal, minimal, and average coverage values of 7961×, 6275.78×, and 1117×, respectively (Fig. S1). The chloroplast genome displayed a unique structural organization, consisting of only a single copy (Figure 2, Fig. S2).
Figure 2.
The detailed genome collinearity map of O. monophylla cp genome. The species name and GC content are shown in the top left corner. The map contains six tracks in default. From the center outward, the first track shows the dispersed repeats. The dispersed repeats consist of direct and palindromic repeats, connected with red and green arcs. The second track shows the long tandem repeats as short blue bars. The third track shows the short tandem repeats or microsatellite sequences. The fourth track displays the genome length. The fifth track shows the GC content along the genome, while the sixth track sounds the genes. The gene names are followed by optional information about codon usage bias and color-coded based on their functional classification. The inner genes are transcribed clockwise, and the outer genes are transcribed anticlockwise. The functional type of the genes is shown in the bottom left corner.
The chloroplast genome of O. monophylla annotation identified 108 complete genes (Table S1), comprising 76 protein-coding genes (76 PCGs), 4 ribosomal RNA genes (4 rRNAs), and 28 tRNA genes (28 tRNAs). Additionally, the genome contained 1 trans-splicing gene (Fig. S3) and 9 cis-splicing genes (Fig. S4), with an overall GC content of 34.2%. Phylogenetic reconstruction using both Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) methods robustly placed O. monophylla within the Oxytropis (Figure 3). In these trees, the 12 Oxytropis species were divided into two strongly supported monophyletic groups (BS, PP = 100%, 1) (Figure 3). Notably, O. monophylla clustered with O. bicolor (BS, PP =100%, 1), indicating a close evolutionary relationship between the two species.
Figure 3.
Phylogenetic tree obtained using the maximum likelihood (ML) and bayesian inference (BI) methods of oxytropis species based on whole chloroplast genome. GenBank accession numbers: Aihagi sparsifolia MW349013 (Jiang et al. 2021), oxytropis aciphylla OK143433 (Bei et al. 2022), oxytropis arctobia MT409175 (Tavares et al. 2022), oxytropis bicolor MN255323 (Su et al. 2019), oxytropis falcata OR491708, oxytropis glabra MW349014 (Liu et al. 2021), oxytropis hirta PP836294, oxytropis monophylla (PV240322), oxyropis kansuensis PQ790176, oxytropis myriophylia PP836295, oxytropis ochrocephala OR897029 (Hu et al. 2024), oxytropis ramosissima PP868418, oxyropis splendens MT409174 (Tavares et al. 2022).
5. Discussion and conclusion
Previous studies have established that land plant chloroplast genomes generally range in size from 107 to 218 kb (Wicke et al. 2011) and encode 110–130 genes (Zhu et al. 2017). The overall GC content of these genomes falls within 30–45% (Zhu et al. 2017), in which, inverted repeat (IR) regions exhibit higher GC content than large single-copy (LSC) regions, which in turn surpass the GC levels of small single-copy (SSC) regions (Zhang et al. 2012; Daniell et al. 2016). In this study, the complete cp genome of O. monophylla was assembled with a total sequence length of 122,413 bp, and 108 complete genes were identified, and the GC content is 34.2%, which is basically consistent with the cp genome characteristics of other species of Oxytropis (Su et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2021; Hu et al. 2024). However, the cp genome characteristics of O. monophylla are at the smaller end of the spectrum for higher plants organelle genomes. In this study, we observed an intriguing phenomenon, the O. monophylla does not display a typical quadripartite structure of higher plants due to the complete absence of inverted repeat (IR) regions. Meanwhile, the characteristic absence of an IR region has also been observed in other cp genomes of Oxytropis genus (Su et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2021; Hu et al. 2024). The absence of inverted repeat (IR) regions may represent a conserved genomic feature in chloroplast genomes across the Oxytropis genus.
The cp genomes have emerged as a central focus in molecular biology research, and demonstrate significant potential for resolving phylogenetic relationships within angiosperms (Yang et al. 2022; Ran et al. 2024). In this study, phylogenetic analyses using the BI method and the ML method revealed that the cp genomes of Oxytropis were divided into two main clades with strong support, and the phylogenetic result was consistent with Liu et al. (2021) and Hu et al. (2024). Notably, O. monophylla and O. bicolor formed a monophyletic group. To advance our understanding, a comprehensive investigation of O. monophylla is necessary, particularly focusing on its codon usage patterns and population-level genomic variations. Such detailed investigations are essential for elucidating structural variations within its chloroplast genome. Furthermore, expanding the collection of Oxytropis cp genomes will enhance our comprehension of evolution within this ecologically significant genus.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors are really grateful for the access to raw genome data from the public database.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the Ningxia Natural Science Foundation (2024AAC03160, 2021A1171) and the graduate innovation project of North Minzu University (YCX24409). The anonymous reviewers and editors are sincerely acknowledged.
Ethical approval
The material involved in the article does not involve ethical conflicts. This species is neither endangered on the cited catalog nor collected from a natural reserve, so it did not need specific permissions or licenses. All collection and sequencing work was strictly executed under local legislation and related laboratory regulations to protect wild resources.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability statement
The complete chloroplast genome sequence of O. monophylla in this study has been submitted to the NCBI database under the accession number PV240322. The associated BioProject, SRA and BioSample numbers are PRJNA1230366, SRR32570914 and SAMN47182783, respectively.
References
- Bei ZL, Zhang L, Tian XJ.. 2022. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of Oxytropis aciphylla Ledeb. (Leguminosae). Mitochond DNA B Resour. 7(9):1756–1757. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2022.2124822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daniell H, Lin CS, Yu M, Chang WJ.. 2016. Chloroplast genomes: diversity, evolution, and applications in genetic engineering. Genome Biol. 17(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1004-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dierckxsens N, Mardulyn P, Smits G.. 2017. NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 45(4):e18. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doyle JJ, Doyle JL.. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 19:11–15. [Google Scholar]
- Grubov VI. 1978. Botanicheskii Zhurnal (Moscow & Leningrad). 63(3):364. [Google Scholar]
- Guo XY, Liu JQ, Hao GQ, Zhang L, Mao KS, Wang XJ, Zhang D, Ma T, Hu QJ, Al-Shehbaz IA, et al. 2017. Plastome phylogeny and early diversification of Brassicaceae. BMC Genom. 18(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3555-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hollingsworth PM, Li DZ, Michelle VDB, Twyford AD.. 2016. Telling plant species apart with DNA: from barcodes to genomes. Phil Trans R Soc B. 371(1702):20150338. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu H, Hu QJ, Al-Shehbaz IA, Luo X, Zeng TT, Guo XY, Liu JQ.. 2016. Species delimitation and interspecific relationships of the Genus Orychophragmus (Brassicaceae) inferred from whole chloroplast genomes. Front Plant Sci. 7:1826. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu XY, Liu YP, Chen JY, Su X.. 2024. The complete chloroplast genome of Oxytropis ochrocephala Bunge 1874 (Fabaceae) and its phylogenetic analysis. Mitochond DNA B Resour. 9(5):641–646. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2024.2350626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang D, Cronk Q.. 2015. Plann: a command-line application for annotating plastome sequences. Appl Plant Sci. 3(8):1500026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang X, Huang W-J, Li Y-R, Si J, Xu J-D, Qin E-D, Yang T-G, Liu H, Wu Z-H, Jiao P-P.. 2021. The complete chloroplast genome of Alhagi sparsifolia Shap.(Leguminosae). Mitochond DNA B Resour. 6(8):2128–2130. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2021.1944366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katoh K, Standley D.. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30(4):772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, et al. 2012. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 28(12):1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup . 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 25(16):2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li X, Liu B, Chen L, Song N.. 2015. Effects of litter accumulation on plant communities in fenced desert steppe. Pol J Ecol. 63(3):333–340. doi: 10.3161/15052249PJE2015.63.3.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li X, Yang Y, Henry RJ, Rossetto M, Wang Y, Chen S.. 2015. Plant DNA barcoding: from gene to genome. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 90(1):157–166. doi: 10.1111/brv.12104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu S, Li YR, Si W, Qu WR, Yang TG, Wu ZH, Jiao PP.. 2021. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Oxytropis glabra (Leguminosae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 6(9):2478–2479. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2021.1914228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malyshev LI. 2008. Phenetics of the subgenera and sections in the genus Oxytropis DC (Fabaceae) bearing on ecology and phylogeny. Contemp Probl Ecol. 1(4):440–444. doi: 10.1134/S1995425508040073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rambaut A. 2012. FigTree v1. 4. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh. Available at: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree. [Google Scholar]
- Ran ZH, Li Z, Xiao X, An MT, Yan C.. 2024. Complete chloroplast genomes of 13 species of sect. Tuberculata Chang (Camellia L.): genomic features, comparative analysis, and phylogenetic relationships. BMC Genom. 25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-09982-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP, et al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 61(3):539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 30(9):1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Su C, Liu PL, Chang ZY, Wen J.. 2019. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Oxytropis bicolor Bunge (Fabaceae). Mitochond DNA B Resour. 4(2):3762–3763. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1682479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tavares JC, Achakkagari SR, Archambault A, Strömvik MV.. 2022. The plastome of Arctic Oxytropis arctobia (Fabaceae) is significantly different from that of O. splendens and other related species. Genome. 65(5):301–313. doi: 10.1139/gen-2021-0059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H, Liu PL, Li J, Yang H, Li Q, Chang ZY.. 2021. Why more leaflets? the role of natural selection in shaping the spatial pattern of leaf-shape variation in Oxytropis diversifolia (Fabaceae) and two close relatives. Front Plant Sci. 12:681962. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.681962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wicke S, Schneeweiss GM, dePamphilis CW, Müller KF, Quandt D.. 2011. The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: gene content, gene order, gene function. Plant Mol Biol. 76(3-5):273–297. doi: 10.1007/s11103-011-9762-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie HH, Zhang L, Zhang C, Chang H, Xi ZX, Xu XT.. 2022. Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of six threatened subgenus Gynopodium (Magnolia) species. BMC Genom. 23(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08934-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Z, Ma WX, Yang XH, Wang LJ, Zhao TT, Liang LS, Wang GX, Ma QH.. 2022. Plastome phylogenomics provide new perspective into the phylogeny and evolution of Betulaceae (Fagales). BMC Plant Biol. 22(1):611. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03991-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L, Xi ZX, Wang MC, Guo XY, Ma T.. 2018. Plastome phylogeny and lineage diversification of Salicaceae with focus on poplars and willows. Ecol Evol. 8(16):7817–7823. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang T, Fang Y, Wang X, Deng X, Zhang X, Hu S, Yu J.. 2012. The complete chloroplast and mitochondrial genome sequences of Boea hygrometrica: insights into the evolution of plant organellar genomes. PLoS One. 7(1):e30531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu TT, Zhang L, Chen WS, Yin J, Li Q.. 2017. Analysis of chloroplast genomes in 1342 plants. Genomics Appl Biol. 36(10):4323–4333. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu XY, Welsh SL, Ohashi H.. 2010. Oxytropis Candolle. In Flora of China, Vol. 10, p. 453–500. Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY, editors. Beijing, China: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The complete chloroplast genome sequence of O. monophylla in this study has been submitted to the NCBI database under the accession number PV240322. The associated BioProject, SRA and BioSample numbers are PRJNA1230366, SRR32570914 and SAMN47182783, respectively.



