Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1995 Nov;69(5):2103–2111. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80081-0

Functional significance of a protein conformation change at the cytoplasmic end of helix F during the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle.

L S Brown 1, G Váró 1, R Needleman 1, J K Lanyi 1
PMCID: PMC1236444  PMID: 8580354

Abstract

The second half of the photocycle of the light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin includes proton transfers between D96 and the retinal Schiff base (the M to N reaction) and between the cytoplasmic surface and D96 (decay of the N intermediate). The inhibitory effects of decreased water activity and increased hydrostatic pressure have suggested that a conformational change resulting in greater hydration of the cytoplasmic region is required for proton transfer from D96 to the Schiff base, and have raised the possibility that the reversal of this process might be required for the subsequent reprotonation of D96 from the cytoplasmic surface. Tilt of the cytoplasmic end of helix F has been suggested by electron diffraction of the M intermediate. Introduction of bulky groups, such as various maleimide labels, to engineered cysteines at the cytoplasmic ends of helices A, B, C, E, and G produce only minor perturbation of the decays of M and N, but major changes in these reactions when the label is linked to helix F. In these samples the reprotonation of the Schiff base is accelerated and the reprotonation of D96 is strongly retarded. Cross-linking with benzophenone introduced at this location, but not at the others, causes the opposite change: the reprotonation of the Schiff base is greatly slowed while the reprotonation of D96 is accelerated. We conclude that, consistent with the structure from diffraction, the proton transfers in the second half of the photocycle are facilitated by motion of the cytoplasmic end of helix F, first away from the center of the protein and then back.

Full text

PDF
2103

Images in this article

2104FIGURE 1
on p.2104

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown L. S., Yamazaki Y., Maeda A., Sun L., Needleman R., Lanyi J. K. The proton transfers in the cytoplasmic domain of bacteriorhodopsin are facilitated by a cluster of interacting residues. J Mol Biol. 1994 Jun 10;239(3):401–414. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cao Y., Brown L. S., Needleman R., Lanyi J. K. Relationship of proton uptake on the cytoplasmic surface and reisomerization of the retinal in the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle: an attempt to understand the complex kinetics of the pH changes and the N and O intermediates. Biochemistry. 1993 Sep 28;32(38):10239–10248. doi: 10.1021/bi00089a046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cao Y., Brown L. S., Sasaki J., Maeda A., Needleman R., Lanyi J. K. Relationship of proton release at the extracellular surface to deprotonation of the schiff base in the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle. Biophys J. 1995 Apr;68(4):1518–1530. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80324-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cao Y., Váró G., Chang M., Ni B. F., Needleman R., Lanyi J. K. Water is required for proton transfer from aspartate-96 to the bacteriorhodopsin Schiff base. Biochemistry. 1991 Nov 12;30(45):10972–10979. doi: 10.1021/bi00109a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dencher N. A., Dresselhaus D., Zaccai G., Büldt G. Structural changes in bacteriorhodopsin during proton translocation revealed by neutron diffraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Oct;86(20):7876–7879. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.20.7876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dormán G., Prestwich G. D. Benzophenone photophores in biochemistry. Biochemistry. 1994 May 17;33(19):5661–5673. doi: 10.1021/bi00185a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Druckmann S., Friedman N., Lanyi J. K., Needleman R., Ottolenghi M., Sheves M. The back photoreaction of the M intermediate in the photocycle of bacteriorhodopsin: mechanism and evidence for two M species. Photochem Photobiol. 1992;56(6):1041–1047. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1992.tb09727.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fodor S. P., Ames J. B., Gebhard R., van den Berg E. M., Stoeckenius W., Lugtenburg J., Mathies R. A. Chromophore structure in bacteriorhodopsin's N intermediate: implications for the proton-pumping mechanism. Biochemistry. 1988 Sep 6;27(18):7097–7101. doi: 10.1021/bi00418a064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Han B. G., Vonck J., Glaeser R. M. The bacteriorhodopsin photocycle: direct structural study of two substrates of the M-intermediate. Biophys J. 1994 Sep;67(3):1179–1186. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80586-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Han J. C., Han G. Y. A procedure for quantitative determination of tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine, an odorless reducing agent more stable and effective than dithiothreitol. Anal Biochem. 1994 Jul;220(1):5–10. doi: 10.1006/abio.1994.1290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heberle J., Dencher N. A. Surface-bound optical probes monitor protein translocation and surface potential changes during the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 1;89(13):5996–6000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.13.5996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Henderson R., Baldwin J. M., Ceska T. A., Zemlin F., Beckmann E., Downing K. H. Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jun 20;213(4):899–929. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80271-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kalisky O., Ottolenghi M., Honig B., Korenstein R. Environmental effects on formation and photoreaction of the M412 photoproduct of bacteriorhodopsin: implications for the mechanism of proton pumping. Biochemistry. 1981 Feb 3;20(3):649–655. doi: 10.1021/bi00506a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kataoka M., Kamikubo H., Tokunaga F., Brown L. S., Yamazaki Y., Maeda A., Sheves M., Needleman R., Lanyi J. K. Energy coupling in an ion pump. The reprotonation switch of bacteriorhodopsin. J Mol Biol. 1994 Nov 4;243(4):621–638. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(94)90037-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Koch M. H., Dencher N. A., Oesterhelt D., Plöhn H. J., Rapp G., Büldt G. Time-resolved X-ray diffraction study of structural changes associated with the photocycle of bacteriorhodopsin. EMBO J. 1991 Mar;10(3):521–526. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07978.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Krebs M. P., Khorana H. G. Mechanism of light-dependent proton translocation by bacteriorhodopsin. J Bacteriol. 1993 Mar;175(6):1555–1560. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.6.1555-1560.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lanyi J. K. Bacteriorhodopsin as a model for proton pumps. Nature. 1995 Jun 8;375(6531):461–463. doi: 10.1038/375461a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lanyi J. K. Proton transfer and energy coupling in the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1992 Apr;24(2):169–179. doi: 10.1007/BF00762675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lanyi J. K. Proton translocation mechanism and energetics in the light-driven pump bacteriorhodopsin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993 Dec 7;1183(2):241–261. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(93)90226-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mathies R. A., Lin S. W., Ames J. B., Pollard W. T. From femtoseconds to biology: mechanism of bacteriorhodopsin's light-driven proton pump. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1991;20:491–518. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.20.060191.002423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nakasako M., Kataoka M., Amemiya Y., Tokunaga F. Crystallographic characterization by X-ray diffraction of the M-intermediate from the photo-cycle of bacteriorhodopsin at room temperature. FEBS Lett. 1991 Nov 4;292(1-2):73–75. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80837-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Needleman R., Chang M., Ni B., Váró G., Fornés J., White S. H., Lanyi J. K. Properties of Asp212----Asn bacteriorhodopsin suggest that Asp212 and Asp85 both participate in a counterion and proton acceptor complex near the Schiff base. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jun 25;266(18):11478–11484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ni B. F., Chang M., Duschl A., Lanyi J., Needleman R. An efficient system for the synthesis of bacteriorhodopsin in Halobacterium halobium. Gene. 1990 May 31;90(1):169–172. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90456-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Oesterhelt D., Stoeckenius W. Isolation of the cell membrane of Halobacterium halobium and its fractionation into red and purple membrane. Methods Enzymol. 1974;31:667–678. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(74)31072-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Oesterhelt D., Tittor J., Bamberg E. A unifying concept for ion translocation by retinal proteins. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1992 Apr;24(2):181–191. doi: 10.1007/BF00762676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rothschild K. J. FTIR difference spectroscopy of bacteriorhodopsin: toward a molecular model. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1992 Apr;24(2):147–167. doi: 10.1007/BF00762674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Steinhoff H. J., Mollaaghababa R., Altenbach C., Hideg K., Krebs M., Khorana H. G., Hubbell W. L. Time-resolved detection of structural changes during the photocycle of spin-labeled bacteriorhodopsin. Science. 1994 Oct 7;266(5182):105–107. doi: 10.1126/science.7939627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Subramaniam S., Gerstein M., Oesterhelt D., Henderson R. Electron diffraction analysis of structural changes in the photocycle of bacteriorhodopsin. EMBO J. 1993 Jan;12(1):1–8. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05625.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Váró G., Lanyi J. K. Distortions in the photocycle of bacteriorhodopsin at moderate dehydration. Biophys J. 1991 Feb;59(2):313–322. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82225-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Váró G., Lanyi J. K. Kinetic and spectroscopic evidence for an irreversible step between deprotonation and reprotonation of the Schiff base in the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle. Biochemistry. 1991 May 21;30(20):5008–5015. doi: 10.1021/bi00234a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Váró G., Lanyi J. K. Thermodynamics and energy coupling in the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle. Biochemistry. 1991 May 21;30(20):5016–5022. doi: 10.1021/bi00234a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Váró G., Zimányi L., Chang M., Ni B., Needleman R., Lanyi J. K. A residue substitution near the beta-ionone ring of the retinal affects the M substates of bacteriorhodopsin. Biophys J. 1992 Mar;61(3):820–826. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81887-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zimányi L., Cao Y., Chang M., Ni B., Needleman R., Lanyi J. K. The two consecutive M substates in the photocycle of bacteriorhodopsin are affected specifically by the D85N and D96N residue replacements. Photochem Photobiol. 1992 Dec;56(6):1049–1055. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1992.tb09728.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zimányi L., Cao Y., Needleman R., Ottolenghi M., Lanyi J. K. Pathway of proton uptake in the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle. Biochemistry. 1993 Aug 3;32(30):7669–7678. doi: 10.1021/bi00081a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zimányi L., Váró G., Chang M., Ni B., Needleman R., Lanyi J. K. Pathways of proton release in the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle. Biochemistry. 1992 Sep 15;31(36):8535–8543. doi: 10.1021/bi00151a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. van Iwaarden P. R., Driessen A. J., Konings W. N. What we can learn from the effects of thiol reagents on transport proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992 Aug 14;1113(2):161–170. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(92)90037-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES