Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2025 Jul 15;91(8):e02124-24. doi: 10.1128/aem.02124-24

Differences in the genomic potential of soil bacterial and viral communities between urban greenspaces and natural arid soils

María Touceda-Suárez 1,, Alise J Ponsero 2, Albert Barberán 1
Editor: John R Spear3
PMCID: PMC12366335  PMID: 40662747

ABSTRACT

Urban green spaces provide essential ecosystem services that are ever more important in arid cities. However, the design and management of these greenspaces often require physicochemical transformations, whose effect in the balance of the arid urban ecosystems is normally not accounted for. In this project, we leverage metagenomic data from soil microbial communities of urban greenspaces and neighboring natural areas in a city from the arid Southwestern USA (Tucson, Arizona) to understand the differences in microbial (bacterial and viral) community structure, taxonomy, and function in urban greenspaces compared to natural arid soils. We found bacterial and viral communities to be distinct between urban greenspace and natural arid soils, with urban greenspace bacteria displaying reduced metabolic versatility and higher genetic potential for simple carbohydrate consumption and nitrogen reduction. Moreover, bacteria in urban greenspaces exhibit higher genetic potential for resistance to heavy metals and certain clinical antibiotics. Our results suggest that the conversion of arid natural land to urban greenspaces determines the soil microbiome structure and functioning, and potentially its ability to adapt to the changing environment.

IMPORTANCE

Urban green spaces are critical for the sustainability of arid cities. Nevertheless, they require deep soil physicochemical transformations. Soil bacterial and viral communities are responsible for soil functioning and provision of some ecosystem services, but they are also highly influenced by changes in the soil environment. The significance of our research is in illustrating the structural and functional changes that microbial and viral communities undergo in urban soils of arid cities and their potential impacts on urban greenspace soil processes.

KEYWORDS: soil microbiology, metagenomics, urban soils, arid lands, soil virus

INTRODUCTION

Urban green spaces provide essential ecosystem services, such as cooling, water filtration, and soil stabilization, that are ever more important in arid cities (1). Urban development in arid areas has been rising with rural-urban migration and the expansion of arid lands globally (2). Yet often, green space infrastructure in arid cities is designed according to global models of urban development, which are not suited for arid conditions (3). For example, intensive irrigation priming and fertilization are needed to maintain green spaces in arid cities since urban greenspaces are usually made up of non-arid adapted vegetation (4, 5). Thus, in addition to the disturbances posed globally by urbanization—such as air, water, and soil pollution; increased temperature; and loss of permeable surface—(6) urban greenspaces in arid cities, and particularly their soils, often undergo complete physicochemical transformations, whose effect in the balance of the urban ecosystems is not yet understood.

Soil microbial and viral communities are responsible for soil functioning and provision of some ecosystem services associated with urban greenspaces, such as soil stabilization, water regulation, carbon storage, nutrient cycling, and antibiotic resistance regulation (7, 8). At the same time, soil microorganisms are influenced by the changes in environmental conditions posed by urban development (9, 10). In fact, urbanization has been shown to, through management and pollution, homogenize soil properties (11) and microbial community composition (1214) and increase microbial nutrient cycling potential, and the proportion of genes associated with greenhouse emissions and resistance to xenobiotics (15). Previous studies reported increased levels of soil inorganic nitrogen, N2O emissions, moisture, and organic matter in urbanized arid soils (16, 17), which have been associated with changes in microbial community composition and functioning (18), and more specifically, with an increased abundance of microbial groups involved in aromatic compound degradation and ammonia oxidation (19). Although these studies provide first insights into the impacts of urbanization on arid soil microbial communities, further high-resolution research is needed to unveil the specific microbial functions that are modified by urbanization and their potential impact in ecosystem services’ provision. This is especially important in arid environments, wherein we know very little about the effects of urbanization on the structure and genetic potential of the soil microbiome.

Whole-genome shotgun analyses (i.e., metagenomics) allow us to study the function of the soil microbiome and identify organisms without the need for prior isolation in pure culture (20). Importantly, assembled metagenomic contigs can be mined to identify genomic sequences from DNA bacteriophages—viruses that infect bacteria—(21). Bacteriophages, or “phages,” shape microbial community structure and modify nutrient cycling by releasing microbial necromass (2224). Additionally, phages can incorporate host genes into their genomes, serving as vectors for horizontal gene transfer and potentially contributing to host environmental adaptations (25). On the other hand, previous studies have found soil phages to be a more responsive fraction of the soil microbial community to rapid changes in the soil environment (26). Indeed, both the community composition and the lifestyle of soil viruses strongly respond to the alterations in soil moisture, with higher-moisture soil environments favoring lytic viruses (27). Thus, we can expect the soil transformations driven by urbanization to influence the phage community and those changes to influence the bacterial community through viral-host dynamics.

Here, we leverage the metagenomic information from soil microbial communities of urban greenspaces and neighboring natural areas in a city from the arid Southwestern USA (Tucson, Arizona) aiming to (i) compare the structure and life history strategies of bacterial and bacteriophage communities between urban and natural soils; (ii) assess changes that the urban environment can cause on microbial function, such as modifications of the genetic potential for carbon and nitrogen cycling and resistance to heavy metals and antibiotics. We hypothesize that i) the structure of both bacterial and phage communities would differ between urban greenspaces and natural arid soils, but phages would show more drastic structural differences; ii) viruses in urban greenspace soils would show a preference for virulent lifestyle facilitated by higher water content caused by soil management; iii) microbial communities of urban greenspace soils would show an increased abundance of genes that metabolize sources of carbon and nitrogen originated from urban-specific inputs of these elements (i.e., fertilization and atmospheric pollution); and iv) urban greenspace soils would show evidence of higher levels of anthropogenic contaminants, such as heavy metals and antibiotics, through a higher abundance of resistance genes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study sites, soil sampling, and physicochemical analyses

Soil samples were collected in Tucson, AZ, USA, and surrounding natural areas in August of 2019 (Fig. S1). Six samples were collected in two urban parks, Reid Park (RP 32°12’28.08’’ N, 110°55’24.96’’ W, elevation 765 m), and Himmel Park (HP; 32°14’0.42’’ N, 110°56’5.48’’ W, elevation 752 m). Twelve samples were collected in natural areas representative of the ecosystem types surrounding the city: Sonoran desert (Sabino Canyon; SC; 32°18’37’’ N, 110°49’16’’ W, elevation 830 m), ponderosa pine forest (Rose Canyon; RC; 32°23’15’’ N, 110°42’40’’ W, elevation 2,119 m), and arid shrubland (Santa Rita Experimental Range: range 11B, 31°46’25’’ N, 110°52’42’’ W, elevation 1,156 m; range 8, 31°46’30’’ N, 110°51’41’’ W, elevation 1,211 m; Exclosure 45, Exc. 45; 31°48’60’’ N, 110°51’42’’ W, elevation 1,553 m; and UAB, 31°49’41’’ N, 110°50’46’’ W, elevation 1,158 m). At each site, 9 m transects were established. Surface soil samples were collected at three equidistant locations along the transect at 3 m, 6 m and 9 m, and 0–20 cm depth. Soil samples were immediately transported in sealed and sterilized plastic bags on ice to the laboratory. Soil samples were sieved through a 2 mm mesh and homogenized. Visible living plant material, like pieces of leaves and roots, was removed. A subsample was placed into a sterilized tube and stored at −80°C until DNA extraction. The remaining soil was used for physicochemical analyses. Soil physicochemical properties: pH, electrical conductivity (EC), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), potassium (K), nitrate (NO3-), phosphate (PO43-), exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP), and cation exchange capacity (CEC) (meq/100 g) were measured from water saturated soil paste extracts produced from 200.0 ± 0.5 g of air-dry pulverized soil by Motzz Laboratory (Phoenix, AZ, USA) using the standard methods for soils of the Western region.

Metagenomic sequencing and assembly

Total soil genomic DNA was extracted using a DNeasy PowerLyzer PowerSoil Kit (Qiagen) following manufacturers’ instructions. Genomic DNA was fragmented to 500 bp length and ligated to Illumina adapters using the QIAseq FX DNA Library Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Quality and quantity were determined with the Agilent 4150 TapeStation DNA bioanalyzer. Samples were shotgun-sequenced on a 2 × 150 bp Illumina NextSeq550 platform at the Microbiome Core of the University of Arizona. The quality of raw reads was evaluated using FastQC v.0.11.9 (28) and used to estimate the parameters for adapter removal with BBduk (29) and quality filtering with Trimmomatic v. 0.38 (30) (reads shorter than 50 bp and low-quality bases were removed). A total of 69,333,926 to 356,676,854 reads per sample remained after quality trimming. Reads from each sample were de novo-assembled using MEGAHIT v. 1.1.4 (31), with the k-mer length increasing from 21 to 141 in steps of 20. The contig N50 ranged from 715 to 964 bp among samples. Protein-coding sequences were inferred from contigs using Prodigal v. 2.6 (32) and dereplicated by clustering by ≥95% similarity and ≥80% overlap using MMseqs2 v.13.45111 (33). This resulted in a catalog containing 32,930,898 non-redundant genes. Paired-end reads of each sample were mapped to the gene catalog using BWA v. 0.7.16 (34) and CoverM (35) to obtain their abundance per sample.

Bacterial taxonomic and functional annotations

Bacterial taxonomy was annotated from community quality-filtered (clean) reads using Kraken2 v.1.1.1 (36) against the 10/23 RefSeq standard database, followed by Bracken v.3 (37) to produce a count table of bacterial species. Nonbacterial species (i.e. eukaryotes) were filtered out of this count table, as well as bacterial species with a prevalence of less than 10% of the samples and an abundance of less than 0.00001.

We calculated life-history traits from urban and natural soil microorganisms. First, average genome size (38) and 16S rRNA copy number were calculated from clean reads following the methods described in Pereira-Flores et al. (39). Average genome size was calculated as the average number of base pairs divided by the number of genomes per sample—estimated as the mean coverage of the 35 single-copy genes—while the average 16S rRNA copy number was estimated as the coverage of 16S rRNA genes divided by the number of genomes. Next, we calculated the GC content and the variance of GC content from clean reads (40). Codon usage bias—the preference of a genome for a specific set of synonymous codons, which correlates with the growth rate—was calculated from ribosomal genes as the inverse mean of the effective number of codons (ENC′) of all ribosomal protein genes (41). Finally, we used annotations obtained by comparing the previously generated gene catalog against the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database using hmmsearch v.3.3.2 (42) to estimate the proportion of unannotated genes and the sugar-acid preference. The proportion of unannotated genes was calculated by comparing the relative abundance of unannotated genes to that of genes with annotations. Sugar-acid preference—which informs of the preferred source of energy of the cell, sugars or amino acids—was calculated as the weighted (SAP) and unweighted ratio between the relative abundance of genes in sugar decomposition pathways and that of genes in amino acid decomposition pathways (43).

To annotate genes involved in the cycling of carbon and nitrogen, heavy metal resistance, and antibiotic resistance in our bacterial populations, clean reads were aligned against the CAZy v.3.2.1 (44), NCyc (45), BacMet v.2.0 (46), and CARD v.3.2.8 (47) protein databases, respectively, using the blastx algorithm (48) through Diamond (49) with an e-value cutoff of 10e-9. Gene count tables were manually normalized to Reads Per Kilobase per Million (RPKM) mapped reads. To obtain a more precise picture of differences in the community C acquisition strategy, the RPKM-normalized abundances of CAZy gene annotations were aggregated based on their targeted substrates (cellulose, chitin, glucan, lignin, peptidoglyans, starch/glycogen, xylan, other animal polysaccharides, other plant polysaccharides, and oligosaccharides) using a curated database (50). In order to obtain the same level of precision in the differences in N cycling processes, RPKM-normalized abundances of NCyc-annotated genes were aggregated on the base of process (i.e., nitrification, denitrification, and nitrogen fixation) using a curated database (45). Genes specific to the denitrification pathway were identified from the literature for a detailed visualization of their abundances (51). BacMet annotations were aggregated based on the heavy metal they provide the cell with resistance to using the BacMet internal classification. CARD annotations were aggregated by the class of the drugs they provide resistance to and resistance mechanism using the CARD ARO ontology.

Bacteriophage inference and annotation

Viral contigs were recovered from metagenomic-assembled contigs using Deepvirfinder2 (52) and Virsorter2 v.2.2.3 (53) with a minimum length cutoff of 1,500 bp. Viral contigs inferred by both tools were merged, and their quality and completion were assessed using CheckV v1.0.1 tool and database v.1.4 (54). Viral operational taxonomic units (vOTUs) were estimated by clustering viral contigs using a 95% identity and 70% completeness cutoff (55) with MMseqs2 (33). Clean reads were mapped to vOTUs to obtain a vOTU count table, which was subsequently normalized to reads per base per million. Viral reads accounted for an average of 6.4% of total metagenomic reads. A summary of the number and length of inferred viral contigs can be found in Zenodo (see Data availability). Taxonomy of viral species was obtained using geNomad v.1.8. (56). In addition, life history classification of viruses in temperate vs virulent viruses was performed using PhaTYP v.3 (57). Finally, potential host taxonomy was predicted from viral sequences using the iPHoP v1.3.3 suite (58), and virus-host ratios (VHR) were calculated as the ratio per sample between the relative abundances of the viruses and the bacterial species identified as their hosts and present in the sample. We annotated both auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in viral sequences. AMGs were inferred from viral contigs—preprocessed with Virsorter2’s “prep-for-dramv” module—using Dram-v (59). While annotating ARGs present in viral contigs, species representative sequences inferred from viral contigs were aligned against the CARD (47) protein database, using the blastx algorithm (48) through DIAMOND v.2.0.9 (49) with an e-value cutoff of 10−9 and a best match filter.

Metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) recovery and annotation

Contigs obtained from singular assembly were binned, and bins were refined into MAGs using Maxbin, MetaBAT, and Concoct through the metaWRAP suite v.1.3.2 (60). A total of 1,133 MAGs were recovered. We retained 66 medium to high-quality MAGs (i.e., >70% completion ;<10% contamination) for downstream analyses (61). MAG taxonomy was annotated using the GTDB-tk v.3 (62) database and tool. The MAG abundance per sample was calculated by mapping quality cleaned reads from back to the MAG collection using BWA v. 0.7.16 (34) and CoverM v.0.6.1 (35), to create a MAG count table. Metabolic gene annotation was performed using DRAM v.3 (59). In order to locate viral sequences in bacterial MAGs, viral species sequences were aligned against a database constructed from medium-high quality MAGs using BLAST with a minimum e-value cut off of 10e-9. Multiple matches of the same viral and bacterial sequence were filtered to conserve only the best match. Antibiotic resistance genes and heavy metal resistance genes were located in MAGs by aligning the MAG sequences against the CARD and BAcmet databases using blast (48) with a minimum e-value cut off of 10e-9. Multiple matches of the same viral and bacterial sequence were filtered to conserve only the best match.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were implemented in R v4.2.2 (63). To account for differences in sequencing depth, richness metrics were rarefied, and abundance data were normalized prior to analysis. To evaluate the effect of urbanization on rarefied soil microbial richness, number of different genes, and relative abundance of genes, we used a mixed-effects model with site as a random effect using lme4 (64). We implemented a PERMANOVA on each data set to test the effect of urbanization, controlling for the effect of site on the microbial community composition and genetic profile composition using the vegan package v.2.6-4 (65). Differential abundance of annotated genes and abovementioned classifications was calculated using the Maaslin2 package v.1.12.0, including a fixed effect of urbanization with site as a random effect (66). To evaluate the association between viruses and their inferred hosts present in our samples, Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated between the relative abundance per sample of each virus and said bacterial host.

RESULTS

Bacterial and viral community structure differed between urban greenspaces and natural soils, urban greenspaces presenting bacteria with lower genome sizes and more virulent viruses

We found 3,572 bacterial species on average per sample and 2,306 vOTUs on average per sample (Fig. 1). The number of different species (i.e., richness) did not differ significantly between soils from urban greenspaces and natural soils for either bacteria (X2 = 0.67, P-value = 0.412; Fig. 1A) or phages (X2 = 0.72, P-value = 0.397; Fig. 1C), but viral abundance was slightly higher in natural soils (X2 = 25.02, P-value < 0.001; Fig. S1). Additionally, when comparing among natural sites representing different habitats, we saw that phage richness was lowest in ponderosa pine forests with respect to all other soils—urban and natural grassland and desert shrubland—(Fig. S1).

Fig 1.

Box plots and ordination graphs compare bacterial and viral species between natural and urban groups. Bacterial richness is similar, while viral richness is higher in urban areas. Ordination shows distinct clustering by habitat type for both communities.

Community structure of soil bacteria and phages in urban greenspaces and natural soils. (A and C) Number of different bacterial and viral species in urban greenspace (blue) and natural (yellow) soils. (B and D) Bacterial and viral community similarity, respectively.

Both bacterial and phage community compositions were different in urban compared to natural soils (bacteria: R2 = 0.20, P-value = 0.001; phages: R2 = 0.24, P-value = 0.001; Fig. 1B and D). Nevertheless, we found significant overlap between all sites, both urban and natural, for both bacteria and viruses, and urban sites had a higher number of distinct vOTUs, but not bacteria (Fig. S2; Table S1). Accordingly, the soil physicochemical composition was also different between urban and natural soils, especially for micronutrients such as Ca, NO3-, and Na; exchangeable sodium potential (ESP); and cation exchange capacity (CEC; Fig. S3). Some of the bacterial families whose abundance changed more dramatically from natural to urban greenspace soils were Geodermatophilaceae and Nocardiodaceae (increased abundance in urban soils) and Mycobacteriaceae and Bradyrhizobiaceae (reduced abundance in urban soils; Fig. S4). Additionally, microbial community composition also differed between natural habitats around Tucson, the most different bacterial and phage communities being those found in ponderosa pine forests (Fig. S1).

In addition to changes in the community composition, we found differences in metagenomics-resolved life history traits between urban greenspace and natural soils. Bacteria in urban soils presented lower average genome sizes than in natural soils (X2 = 33.73, P-value < 0.001; Fig. 2A), but higher average 16S rRNA copy number (X2 = 7.19, P-value = 0.007; Fig. 2B), a nonsignificant tendency toward higher GC content (X2 = 2.15, P-value = 0.145; Fig. 2C), and proportion of unannotated genes (Fig. S4). The GC content variance, however, was lower in urban soils (X2 = 3.688, P-value = 0.055; Fig. S4), while no differences were found in codon usage bias (X2 = 0.33, P-value = 0.565; Fig. S4). We were able to predict the lifestyle of 39% of the inferred viral contigs and compare their abundance in urban vs natural soils. We found that while the abundance of temperate phages was higher than that of virulent phages in both soils (urban: F = 0.9, P-value = 0.364; natural: F = 16.77, P-value < 0.001; Fig. 2D), the ratio of virulent/temperate virus abundance was slightly higher in urban soils (urban = 0.67, natural = 0.54).

Fig 2.

Box plots and histograms compare microbial traits in natural and urban sites. Urban microbes show smaller genomes, higher G C content, more rRNA copies, greater virus abundance and stronger virus–host abundance correlation.

Functional traits of bacterial and viral communities in urban greenspaces and natural soils. (A–C) Metagenomics-informed bacterial life history traits. (D) Relative abundance—in reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM)—of inferred viral lifestyles. (E and F) Density distribution of Pearson correlation coefficient values between virus abundance (RPKM) and predicted host abundance (RPKM).

Both urban greenspace and natural soils have a higher proportion of lysogenic viruses, but carbon utilization AMGs are more abundant in urban greenspaces

We predicted the potential hosts of 23% of the inferred viral contigs. Although most high-abundance hosts were shared in both urban and natural soils (i.e., Geodermatophilaceae, Streptomycetaceae, and Rubrobacteraceae), urban soils showed a uniquely high abundance of certain families, such as Nitrososphaeraceae and Coleofasciculaceae, and reduced abundance of Acetobacteraceae compared to natural soils (Fig. S5). We calculated the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) between the abundance of each phage and that of its host (67). In urban soils, the frequency distributions of r were highly skewed to the left, values between 0.5 and 1 being the most frequent; while in natural soils, the distribution of r values was multimodal, showing peaks around r = 0 and r = [0.25–1] (Fig. 2E and F). Correlation values closer to +1 could suggest a higher proportion of lysogenic viruses (in a 1 to 1 abundance relationship with their host due to mutualism), while values closer to −1 would signify a higher proportion of lysogeny (1 to −1 abundance relationship with their host due to predation). Furthermore, we calculated the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the virus-host abundance ratio (VHR) and the host abundance, which follows the opposite logic to the correlation between abundances. Most correlation values for pairs in both urban and natural soils were negative, while pairs in urban soils showed slightly higher frequencies of positive values (Fig. S6). Additionally, when plotting the bacterial genus abundance per sample against the number of putative links with viruses present in the said sample we found, in both urban and natural soils, that our observations clustered around three areas of the plot: low host abundance, low viral presence (most of the observations); low host abundance, medium to high viral presence; and medium to high host abundance, low viral presence; but did not find many cases of bacterial hosts having both high abundance and high viral presence (Fig. S6).

A total of 18 putative auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs) were identified from the bacteriophage contigs, 16 of them from bacteriophages inferred from urban soils. Of these 16 genes, five of them were involved in organic nitrogen utilization, and one of them was involved in carbon utilization (Table S2). Both AMG groups showed higher abundance in urban soils (Fig. S7). No genes of antibiotic resistance were found in viral genomes.

Urban greenspace soil bacteria harbor less diversity of carbon and nitrogen cycling genes and are specialized on simpler carbohydrate decomposition and denitrification

Although the abundance of C cycling genes was similar in urban and natural soils (X2 = 0.97, P-value = 0.325; Fig. 3A) and across different natural habitats (Fig. S8), natural soils harbored a higher C cycling gene richness—measured as the number of different C cycling genes—(X2 = 10.78, P-value = 0.001; Fig. 3B), with the ponderosa pine forest having the highest values of richness and shrubland the lowest among natural soils (Fig. S8). Furthermore, by comparing the abundance of genes in different pathways, we observed that urban soil microorganisms had a higher abundance of genes involved in the metabolism of simple starch and glycogen substrates, while natural soils had higher abundance of genes involved in the metabolism of more complex compounds (i.e., dextran, glucan, chitin, and cellulose Fig. 3E).

Fig 3.

Graphs compare metabolic gene profiles. Natural sites have higher abundance and diversity of C cycling genes, especially for glucan and chitin. Urban sites show enriched N cycling, sugar metabolism, and increased preference for sugar over acid substrates.

Carbon and nitrogen cycling potential of soil microbial communities under urbanization. (A and B) Relative abundance of genes involved in C and N metabolism. (C and D) Number of different genes involved in C and N metabolism. (E) Differential abundance of C cycling genes in pathways of decomposition of different carbohydrates. (F) Differential abundance of N cycling genes involved in different processes within the N cycle. (G and H) Weighted (SAP) and unweighted ratio between the relative abundance of genes involved in sugar metabolism and genes involved in acid metabolism.

Urban soils had higher relative abundance of nitrogen cycling genes (X2 = 7.27, P-value = 0.007; Fig. 3B) and, similarly to the C cycling genes, a tendency to lower richness (X2 = 3.81, P-value = 0.051; Fig. 4D), with forest soils showing the lowest values of richness among natural habitats (Fig. S8). Specifically, urban soils showed a higher differential abundance of genes involved in denitrification (conversion of oxidized nitrogen forms to nitrogen gas) and dissimilatory nitrate reduction (reduction of nitrate in the absence of oxygen; Fig. 3F). All genes in the denitrification pathway except nirS (χ2 = 0.34, P-value = 0.56) showed a nonsignificant tendency toward higher abundance in urban soils (i.e., narG: χ2 = 3.81, P-value = 0.05, nirK: χ2 = 2.30, P-value = 0.13, norB: χ2 = 1.75, P-value = 0.79, nosZ: χ2 = 0.11, P-value = 0.74; Fig. S8). Additionally, none of the genes involved in ammonia oxidation had higher abundances in urban soils (Fig. S8). Finally, urban soils had higher values of both weighted sugar-acid ratio, or SAP, (X2 = 0.81, P-value = 0.367; Fig. 3G), and unweighted ratio of relative abundance of sugar decomposition genes vs acid decomposition genes (X2 = 0.88, P-value = 0.349; Fig. 3H).

Fig 4.

Box plots and bar charts show urban sites have higher abundance and diversity of HMRGs, while natural sites show higher ARG levels. Resistance gene profiles differ by environment, with distinct contributions from efflux, inactivation, and metals.

Potential for heavy metal and antibiotic resistance in urban greenspace and natural soils. (A and B) Relative abundance of HMRGs and ARGs. (C and D) Number of different HMRGs and ARGs. (E and F) Differential abundance of HMRGs and ARGs.

Urban greenspace soil bacteria have a higher load of heavy metals but not antibiotic resistance genes

Both the relative abundance of heavy metal resistance genes (HMRGs) and their richness were higher in urban soils compared to natural soils (relative abundance: X2 = 8.07 P-value = 0.030; richness: X2 = 11.61 P-value = 0.003; Fig. 4A and C), with no differences between natural habitats (Fig. S9). Differential abundance calculations on resistance genes grouped by heavy metal or compound resulted in 51 groups at a 0.2 q-value cutoff level (Fig. S10), eight of them being more abundant in urban soils (i.e., silver, antimony, gold, mercury, manganese, copper, arsenic, and cobalt). This translated into 222 genes differentially abundant at a 0.2 q-value threshold. When selecting the top 20 most differentially abundant genes—genes with the highest absolute differential abundance coefficient value—urban soils presented a higher abundance of genes of resistance to arsenic, iron, mercury, and nickel, while resistance genes to copper and zinc were more abundant in natural soils (Fig. 4E).

Contrary to the HMRGs, neither the abundance nor the richness of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) was significantly different in urban vs natural soils (relative abundance: X2 = 0.12, P-value = 0.733; richness: X2 = 1.73, P-value = 0.188; Fig. 4B and D). Only one resistance mechanism (i.e., antibiotic target replacement) was differentially abundant between natural and urban soils using a q-value >0.2 threshold, being higher in urban soils (Fig. S10). However, 15 drug classes were differentially abundant over that same 0.2 q-value threshold, seven of them having higher abundance in urban soils (i.e., pleuromutilin, panem, penam, streptogramin A, cephamycin, oxazolidinone, and macrolide; Fig. S10). These groups translated into 168 differentially abundant ARGs. Out of the top 20, five were more abundant in urban soils: aminoglycoside nucleotidyltransferase genes aadA5, ANT(4’)lla and ANT(4’)llb, and myosin gene MYO1, all involved in antibiotic inactivation, and tetracycline efflux pump gene tet35, which is involved in antibiotic efflux (Fig. 4F).

DISCUSSION

The soil modifications required to maintain greenspaces in arid climates, together with disturbances associated with the urban environment, may produce changes in the function of soil microbial communities and consequentially on ecosystem dynamics (68). In this study, we leveraged soil metagenomes from urban greenspaces and neighboring natural ecosystems in a city from the arid Southwest US (Tucson, Arizona) to study these changes. Briefly, we found large differences in the community composition of bacteria and bacteriophages and ecologically informed bacterial functional traits—such as genome size, average rRNA copy number, and GC content—between urban greenspaces and natural soils, but we found no changes in richness for either microbial group. Regarding virus-host associations, we found most viruses to be temperate in both urban and natural soils and their abundances to be coupled to the abundance of their hosts in most cases. Additionally, an analysis of the association between host abundance and the number of viruses that could infect the said host revealed three interaction types: low host abundance—low putative viral links; low host abundance—medium/high putative viral links; and medium/high host abundance—low putative viral links. The soil microbiome of urban greenspaces showed a specialization in simple forms of carbon and an enhanced potential for cycling of nitrogen—specifically denitrification—and resistance to heavy metals. Lastly, we found that, while the potential for antibiotic resistance was not higher in urban greenspace soils, we did find genes of resistance to clinically used antibiotics in these soils.

Differences in both bacterial and viral community composition between urban greenspace and natural soils were in agreement with our hypothesis that urban soil transformation leads to changes in soil bacterial and viral structure and consistent with previous findings (19). However, given that the difference in the bacterial community composition has also been seen in different cities around the globe (15), it seems that these changes are a consequence of the differences between urban greenspaces (i.e., management) and natural soils irrespective of the climate. Importantly, viral communities revealed less species presence overlap between urban and natural soils than bacterial communities, confirming previous evidence of high heterogeneity in viral species distribution (26, 69). On the other hand, we found no differences in either bacterial or viral richness between urban and natural soils. As a matter of fact, the effects of urbanization on microbial species richness have been contested in the literature (7072), which suggests that there is no uniform effect of urbanization and that factors such as microbial group (73), urbanization intensity (19), city characteristics (74), urban site characteristics (75), and spatial scale (76) may modify the response soil microbial communities have to the complex urban environment. Thus, our results confirm that in our Southwestern US city, urban soils harbor a bacterial and viral diversity comparable to that of natural arid soils (19).

To further illustrate the functional consequences of the differences in the community composition between urban greenspaces and natural arid soils, we explored community-level metagenomics-informed bacterial life history traits. The use of life history traits has been gaining attention in microbial ecology, partly because they allow sorting through the overwhelming amount of data on taxonomical groups and gene abundances associated with metagenomics studies and distill a classification of the microbial communities based on their interaction with the environment (77). For example, a recent study used several genomic traits of Sonoran Desert bare and vegetated soil microbial communities to characterize them in the copiotroph-oligotroph framework (78). In our study, we found bacterial communities of urban greenspace soils to have lower average genome size and higher 16S rRNA copy number, suggesting that these communities are dominated by bacteria that are less metabolically versatile, and thus less able to deal with environmental variability (38, 79), but are in turn capable of rapidly responding to resource availability and triggering growth (80). These traits match what would be expected of soil microorganisms specialized in a homogeneous and stable environment with periodic input of nutrients and water, such as an urban park. At the same time, the reduced genomic versatility acquired through this specialization could pose a disadvantage for these microorganisms in the face of changing climatic conditions (81). Interestingly, the average community GC content in our microbial communities was higher in urban greenspace soil communities. High GC content is associated with thermal resistance since DNA molecules with high GC content tend to be more stable (82) and thus could be a result of higher soil temperatures caused by the Urban Heat Island effect, which is poorly regulated in grass-dominated urban parks (83). Alternatively, the higher GC content could be associated with the higher abundance of Actinobacteria in these soils (84). Together, these results reflect the adaptations we could expect from a microbial community subjected to a warmer, moister, and more nutrient-rich soil environment. Unfortunately, they could also reflect a reduced adaptability to changing conditions.

On the same line, we know that viral life strategies and virus-host interactions are influenced by differences in the soil environment. For instance, increased water in soil pore space enhances the propagation of lytic viruses and, since infection requires physical contact, their ability to infect bacterial hosts (85). This could explain why we found higher levels of predicted virulent viruses and AMGs for viral reproductive success in urban soils compared to natural soils (86). However, most of the viruses we inferred from both urban and natural soils were predicted to have temperate lifestyles, as is generally the case in soils (87). These results, together with the higher occurrence of positive correlations between the relative abundances of viruses and their hosts, the lower correlation values between soil virus-host ratio and microbial density, and the lack of differences in host targeting potential, suggest that most of the soil viral community replicates with their host (lysogeny) in both natural and urban greenspace soils—although increased moisture and temperature in urban greenspaces could cause peaks in lytic activity—and points to a potential dominance of a Piggyback-The-Winner strategy (67, 88). It is important to note, however, that current viral lifestyle annotation methods used in this work offer limited annotations—we were able to annotate the lifestyle of 39% and host of 23% of the viral community, and thus our conclusions should be revised upon improvement of the annotation software. Second, while our approach correlating host and virus abundance builds on theoretically sound principles (67), it requires further validation through comparative studies. Finally, our analyses rely on metagenomically inferred viral genomes, which neither maximize viral genome recovery nor capture the active viral community (89). These methodological considerations should be kept in mind when interpreting our viral ecology findings.

The changes in bacterial community structure and life strategies were accompanied by changes in microbial genetic potential (90). While our functional potential analysis primarily focused on prokaryotic communities, it is important to acknowledge that eukaryotic microorganisms present in the metagenomes may also contribute to the observed genetic potential, although their relative contribution is expected to be minor compared to the dominant bacterial communities (91). Changes in the microbial biogeochemical cycling potential of C and N between natural and urban soils are of special interest given the continuous expansion of urbanized land and its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions (18, 92). Numerous studies have tackled this issue, showing that, contrary to elements that are dependent on the soil parent material (i.e., P and K), C and N are deeply influenced by anthropogenic activities (93). For example, the C cycle can be influenced in urban soils through deposition and accumulation of inorganic carbon and black carbon from industrial and vehicle emissions, and through the increase of organic carbon from introduced vegetation and management dependent (94). In our study, the effects of such increased organic matter are evidenced by the reduced diversity of C cycling genes in urban soils compared to natural soils, which could be due to a reduced variability in C sources. Furthermore, despite the general abundance of C cycling genes not increasing in urbanized soils compared to natural soils, urban soils had a preference for sugar metabolism and higher abundance of genes involved in the degradation of starch, a plant-produced polysaccharide that is usually decomposed in early stages, while natural soils presented genes, at both the community and the genome level, for the decomposition of a more diversified range of C sources, most of them being late decomposition-stage polysaccharides, such as cellulose, and microbially produced polysaccharides (i.e., dextran and chitin) (95). Additionally, the fact that this specialization has not been seen in other cities (15) supports the hypothesis that vegetation changes and management are key factors altering the C cycling genetic potential (number of genes and their abundance) of microbial communities in arid cities specifically (93, 96).

Simultaneously, the N cycle in urban soils is altered by the introduction of inorganic N through fertilization and atmospheric deposition (17). This is evidenced in our study by the higher abundance of N cycling genes found in urban soil microbial communities, and the decreased diversity of those genes, again suggesting a decrease in the variability of N sources. The introduction of inorganic N fertilizers has been associated with an increase in the levels of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions in both agricultural and urban-managed soils (97). N2O is a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential 300 times that of CO2, whose concentrations, together with those of its reduced form of nitric oxide (NO), in the atmosphere have grown exponentially primarily due to human activity (98). Production of N2O in soils happens primarily through denitrification of nitrate (NO3-) to N2, which we found to be the pathway with more highly abundant genes in urban soils, together with dissimilatory nitrate reduction, another pathway of production of N2O (99). However, enrichment of denitrification pathways has been seen in urban greenspace soils in other climates (15), suggesting that the emission of this gas is not climate-specific. Furthermore, our study is limited to the genetic potential of microbial communities, and our results are therefore not a good indicator of the measure of metabolization of N forms into N2O. Studies looking at the expression of the genes involved in the production and consumption of N2O should be coupled with measuring the emission of these gases from urban soils to answer these questions.

Urban soil microorganisms are exposed to pollutants originated from human activities, which makes them a critical laboratory to study the effects this exposure could have on natural systems in the long run. Since our health is closely tied to the environmental microorganisms that we are in contact with, one very relevant question to explore in soil metagenomes is how exposure to anthropogenic pollution modifies the genetic make-up of these microbes (100). Two prevalent forms of this pollution in urban environments, and specifically soils, are heavy metals and antibiotics. Both heavy metals and antibiotics can hamper the survival of soil microbes, and thus microbes will respond to the presence of these substances by encoding molecular barriers—or resistance mechanisms—in their genomes. Supporting this notion, we found the abundance and diversity of heavy metal resistance genes to be higher in urban soils compared to natural soils. Gene-specific analysis revealed a higher abundance of genes providing resistance to some common urban pollutants such as copper (Cu), mercury (Hg), and arsenic (As) (101), while genes of resistance to other metals such as lead (Pb) and zinc (Zn) were highly abundant in natural soils, which could be originated through the influence of contamination expanding over the city limits or through the presence of these metals in the soil’s parent material (102). Surprisingly, microbes from natural soils present resistance genes to a wider variety of pollutants, including growth enhancers (i.e., hydrazine), fertilizer-related pollutants (i.e., halogens), and anti-parasites (i.e., salicylanilide).

In contrast with a previous study targeting urban greenspace soils of 23 cities globally distributed (15), we did not find the abundance or richness of ARGs to be higher in urban greenspaces compared to natural soils. We hypothesize that this discrepancy could be due to the ARG genes included in the study. In our study, we included all ARGs present in the CARD database, while the other studies selected clinically relevant ones. Based on this, our results suggest that the adoption of antibiotic resistance as a response to competition—evidenced by larger genome sizes—in natural soils is comparable to that one responding to human pollution with antibiotics in urban soils. Another possible explanation would be for urban pollution to reach city-adjacent natural sites (102). Most probably, our results are originated from a combination of both of the previous potential mechanisms; since when we interrogated further on the class of drugs microorganisms present resistance to, we find a combination of drugs of present clinical use (i.e., tetracycline, fluoroquinolones, elfamycin, and nitrofuran) and compounds that are still not developed for clinical use (i.e., free fatty acids) (103).

In summary, this study analyzed the differences in microbial structure and function in urban greenspaces and natural soil of an arid Southwestern US city. We found that urban greenspaces in this city harbor less versatile bacterial communities with efficient growth strategies based on simple carbohydrate sources and elevated potential for resistance to heavy metals and certain clinical antibiotics. Furthermore, bacterial communities from urban greenspaces showed a higher potential for denitrification, which leads to the production of N2O, a potent greenhouse gas. Although our analysis was limited to the genetic potential of soil microorganisms and should be confirmed through measurements of soil gas emissions, these results suggest that the management required to maintain urban greenspaces in arid cities can contribute to global greenhouse emissions, as well as to the generation of soil microbial communities with a reduced resilience to changing conditions. The design of greenspaces in arid cities could focus on low management alternatives, such as native vegetation, to balance their ecosystem services and disservices (104). All in all, our findings enhance our understanding of the impacts that the management of urban greenspaces has on the soil microbiome and provide evidence of the role of soil microorganisms in the shifts in ecosystem dynamics produced by the soil transformations introduced in urban greenspaces of arid cities.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by a grant from the Academy of Finland (339172 to A.J.P.).

Contributor Information

María Touceda-Suárez, Email: mtoucedasuarez@arizona.edu.

John R. Spear, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

Scripts for the analysis and visualization of data can be found at https://github.com/merytouceda/urban_greenspaces_aridcities. Final data products from processing can be found at 10.5281/zenodo.13152735. Raw metagenomics sequences are available in NCBI under reference number PRJNA1143147.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02124-24.

Supplemental material. aem.02124-24-s0001.docx.

Figures S1 to S10; Tables S1 and S2.

aem.02124-24-s0001.docx (1.7MB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/aem.02124-24.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. González-Méndez B, Chávez-García E. 2020. Re-thinking the Technosol design for greenery systems: challenges for the provision of ecosystem services in semiarid and arid cities. J Arid Environ 179:104191. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104191 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gober P, Burns EK. 2002. The size and shape of phoenix’s urban fringe. J Plan Educ Res 21:379–390. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0202100403 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Larson EK, Perrings C. 2013. The value of water-related amenities in an arid city: the case of the Phoenix metropolitan area. Landsc Urban Plan 109:45–55. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Pearse WD, Cavender-Bares J, Hobbie SE, Avolio M, Bettez N, Chowdhury RR, Groffman PM, Grove M, Hall SJ, Heffernan JB, Learned J, Neill C, Nelson KC, Pataki DE, Ruddell BL, Steele ME, Trammell TLE. 2016. Ecological homogenisation in North American urban yards: vegetation diversity, composition, and structure. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/061937 [DOI]
  • 5. Ignatieva M, Haase D, Dushkova D, Haase A. 2020. Lawns in cities: from a globalised urban green space phenomenon to sustainable nature-based solutions. Land (Basel) 9:73. doi: 10.3390/land9030073 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Boone CG, Groffman PM, Irwin E, Kaushal SS, Marshall V, McGrath BP, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Szlavecz K, Troy A, Warren P. 2011. Urban ecological systems: scientific foundations and a decade of progress. J Environ Manage 92:331–362. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ooi QE, Nguyen CTT, Laloo A, Bandla A, Swarup S. 2022. Urban soil microbiome functions and their linkages with ecosystem services, p 47–63. In Rakshit A, Ghosh S, Vasenev V, Pathak H, Rajput VD (ed), Soils in urban ecosystem. Springer, Singapore. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Fan K, Chu H, Eldridge DJ, Gaitan JJ, Liu Y-R, Sokoya B, Wang J-T, Hu H-W, He J-Z, Sun W, et al. 2023. Soil biodiversity supports the delivery of multiple ecosystem functions in urban greenspaces. Nat Ecol Evol 7:113–126. doi: 10.1038/s41559-022-01935-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Nugent A, Allison SD. 2022. A framework for soil microbial ecology in urban ecosystems. Ecosphere 13:e3968. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.3968 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Cleavenger S, Chen Y, Barberán A. 2023. Mesquite-associated soil and phyllosphere microbial communities differ across land-use types in drylands. Elem Sci Anth 11:00026. doi: 10.1525/elementa.2023.00026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ryan CD, Groffman PM, Grove JM, Hall SJ, Heffernan JB, Hobbie SE, Locke DH, Morse JL, Neill C, Nelson KC, O’Neil‐Dunne J, Roy Chowdhury R, Steele MK, Trammell TLE. 2022. Ecological homogenization of soil properties in the American residential macrosystem. Ecosphere 13:e4208. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.4208 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Barberán A, Ladau J, Leff JW, Pollard KS, Menninger HL, Dunn RR, Fierer N. 2015. Continental-scale distributions of dust-associated bacteria and fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:5756–5761. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420815112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Epp Schmidt DJ, Pouyat R, Szlavecz K, Setälä H, Kotze DJ, Yesilonis I, Cilliers S, Hornung E, Dombos M, Yarwood SA. 2017. Urbanization erodes ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity and may cause microbial communities to converge. Nat Ecol Evol 1:123. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Liu L, Barberán A, Gao C, Zhang Z, Wang M, Wurzburger N, Wang X, Zhang R, Li J, Zhang J. 2022. Impact of urbanization on soil microbial diversity and composition in the megacity of Shanghai. Land Degrad Dev 33:282–293. doi: 10.1002/ldr.4145 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Delgado-Baquerizo M, Eldridge DJ, Liu Y-R, Sokoya B, Wang J-T, Hu H-W, He J-Z, Bastida F, Moreno JL, Bamigboye AR, et al. 2021. Global homogenization of the structure and function in the soil microbiome of urban greenspaces. Sci Adv 7:eabg5809. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg5809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Davies R, Hall SJ. 2010. Direct and indirect effects of urbanization on soil and plant nutrients in desert ecosystems of the Phoenix metropolitan area, Arizona (USA). Urban Ecosyst 13:295–317. doi: 10.1007/s11252-010-0120-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hall SJ, Huber D, Grimm NB. 2008. Soil N2O and NO emissions from an arid, urban ecosystem. J Geophys Res 113:1016. doi: 10.1029/2007JG000523 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hall SJ, Ahmed B, Ortiz P, Davies R, Sponseller RA, Grimm NB. 2009. Urbanization alters soil microbial functioning in the Sonoran desert. Ecosystems (N Y, Print) 12:654–671. doi: 10.1007/s10021-009-9249-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Chen Y, Martinez A, Cleavenger S, Rudolph J, Barberán A. 2021. Changes in soil microbial communities across an urbanization gradient: a local-scale temporal study in the arid southwestern USA. Microorganisms 9:1470. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9071470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Fierer N. 2017. Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:579–590. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Williamson KE, Fuhrmann JJ, Wommack KE, Radosevich M. 2017. Viruses in soil ecosystems: an unknown quantity within an unexplored territory. Annu Rev Virol 4:201–219. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-101416-041639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Trubl G, Jang HB, Roux S, Emerson JB, Solonenko N, Vik DR, Solden L, Ellenbogen J, Runyon AT, Bolduc B, Woodcroft BJ, Saleska SR, Tyson GW, Wrighton KC, Sullivan MB, Rich VI. 2018. Soil viruses are underexplored players in ecosystem carbon processing. mSystems 3:e00076-18. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00076-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Albright MBN, Gallegos-Graves LV, Feeser KL, Montoya K, Emerson JB, Shakya M, Dunbar J. 2022. Experimental evidence for the impact of soil viruses on carbon cycling during surface plant litter decomposition. ISME Commun 2:24. doi: 10.1038/s43705-022-00109-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wieczynski DJ, Yoshimura KM, Denison ER, Geisen S, DeBruyn JM, Shaw AJ, Weston DJ, Pelletier DA, Wilhelm SW, Gibert JP. 2023. Viral infections likely mediate microbial controls on ecosystem responses to global warming. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 99:fiad016. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiad016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Sun M, Yuan S, Xia R, Ye M, Balcázar JL. 2023. Underexplored viral auxiliary metabolic genes in soil: diversity and eco‐evolutionary significance. Environ Microbiol 25:800–810. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Santos-Medellín C, Blazewicz SJ, Pett-Ridge J, Firestone MK, Emerson JB. 2023. Viral but not bacterial community successional patterns reflect extreme turnover shortly after rewetting dry soils. Nat Ecol Evol 7:1809–1822. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02207-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nicolas AM, Sieradzki ET, Pett-Ridge J, Banfield JF, Taga ME, Firestone MK, Blazewicz SJ. 2023. A subset of viruses thrives following microbial resuscitation during rewetting of a seasonally dry California grassland soil. Nat Commun 14:5835. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40835-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Andrews S. 2010. Babraham Bioinformatics - FastQC a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data [Internet]. Available from: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
  • 29. Bushnell B. 2022. BBMap. SourceForge. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. 2015. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:1674–1676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Steinegger M, Söding J. 2017. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat Biotechnol 35:1026–1028. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Aroney STN, Newell RJP, Nissen J, Camargo AP, Tyson GW, Woodcroft BJ. 2024. CoverM: read coverage calculator for metagenomics. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10531253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36. Wood DE, Salzberg SL. 2014. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol 15:R46. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Lu J, Breitwieser FP, Thielen P, Salzberg SL. 2017. Bracken: estimating species abundance in metagenomics data. PeerJ Comput Sci 3:e104. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Barberán A, Ramirez KS, Leff JW, Bradford MA, Wall DH, Fierer N. 2014. Why are some microbes more ubiquitous than others? Predicting the habitat breadth of soil bacteria. Ecol Lett 17:794–802. doi: 10.1111/ele.12282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Pereira-Flores E, Glöckner FO, Fernandez-Guerra A. 2019. Fast and accurate average genome size and 16S rRNA gene average copy number computation in metagenomic data. BMC Bioinformatics 20:453. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3031-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Barberán A, Fernández-Guerra A, Bohannan BJM, Casamayor EO. 2012. Exploration of community traits as ecological markers in microbial metagenomes. Mol Ecol 21:1909–1917. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05383.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Vieira-Silva S, Rocha EPC. 2010. The systemic imprint of growth and its uses in ecological (meta)genomics. PLOS Genet 6:e1000808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Johnson LS, Eddy SR, Portugaly E. 2010. Hidden Markov model speed heuristic and iterative HMM search procedure. BMC Bioinformatics 11:431. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Gralka M, Pollak S, Cordero OX. 2023. Genome content predicts the carbon catabolic preferences of heterotrophic bacteria. Nat Microbiol 8:1799–1808. doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01458-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, Henrissat B. 2009. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D233–D238. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Tu Q, Lin L, Cheng L, Deng Y, He Z. 2019. NCycDB: a curated integrative database for fast and accurate metagenomic profiling of nitrogen cycling genes. Bioinformatics 35:1040–1048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Pal C, Bengtsson-Palme J, Rensing C, Kristiansson E, Larsson DGJ. 2014. BacMet: antibacterial biocide and metal resistance genes database. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D737–D743. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. McArthur AG, Waglechner N, Nizam F, Yan A, Azad MA, Baylay AJ, Bhullar K, Canova MJ, De Pascale G, Ejim L, et al. 2013. The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3348–3357. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00419-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. McGinnis S, Madden TL. 2004. BLAST: at the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 32:W20–W25. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. 2015. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 12:59–60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Piton G, Allison SD, Bahram M, Hildebrand F, Martiny JBH, Treseder KK, Martiny AC. 2023. Life history strategies of soil bacterial communities across global terrestrial biomes. Nat Microbiol 8:2093–2102. doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01465-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Yang L, Zhang X, Ju X. 2017. Linkage between N2O emission and functional gene abundance in an intensively managed calcareous fluvo-aquic soil. Sci Rep 7:43283. doi: 10.1038/srep43283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Ren J, Song K, Deng C, Ahlgren NA, Fuhrman JA, Li Y, Xie X, Poplin R, Sun F. 2020. Identifying viruses from metagenomic data using deep learning. Quant Biol 8:64–77. doi: 10.1007/s40484-019-0187-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Guo J, Bolduc B, Zayed AA, Varsani A, Dominguez-Huerta G, Delmont TO, Pratama AA, Gazitúa MC, Vik D, Sullivan MB, Roux S. 2021. VirSorter2: a multi-classifier, expert-guided approach to detect diverse DNA and RNA viruses. Microbiome 9:37. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00990-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Nayfach S, Camargo AP, Schulz F, Eloe-Fadrosh E, Roux S, Kyrpides NC. 2021. CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes. Nat Biotechnol 39:578–585. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-00774-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Li J, Yang F, Xiao M, Li A. 2022. Advances and challenges in cataloging the human gut virome. Cell Host Microbe 30:908–916. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Camargo AP, Roux S, Schulz F, Babinski M, Xu Y, Hu B, Chain PSG, Nayfach S, Kyrpides NC. 2024. Identification of mobile genetic elements with geNomad. Nat Biotechnol 42:1303–1312. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01953-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Shang J, Tang X, Sun Y. 2023. PhaTYP: predicting the lifestyle for bacteriophages using BERT. Brief Bioinform 24:bbac487. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Roux S, Camargo AP, Coutinho FH, Dabdoub SM, Dutilh BE, Nayfach S, Tritt A. 2023. iPHoP: an integrated machine learning framework to maximize host prediction for metagenome-derived viruses of archaea and bacteria. PLoS Biol 21:e3002083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Shaffer M, Borton MA, McGivern BB, Zayed AA, La Rosa SL, Solden LM, Liu P, Narrowe AB, Rodríguez-Ramos J, Bolduc B, Gazitúa MC, Daly RA, Smith GJ, Vik DR, Pope PB, Sullivan MB, Roux S, Wrighton KC. 2020. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res 48:8883–8900. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Uritskiy GV, DiRuggiero J, Taylor J. 2018. MetaWRAP-a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis. Microbiome 6:158. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0541-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Bowers RM, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, Harmon-Smith M, Doud D, Reddy TBK, Schulz F, Jarett J, Rivers AR, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, et al. 2017. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol 35:725–731. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2020. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. R Core Development Team . 2015. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 3.2.1. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/
  • 64. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Oksanen J, Blanchet GF, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szöcs E, Wagner HH. 2020. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-6
  • 66. Mallick H, Rahnavard A, McIver LJ, Ma S, Zhang Y, Nguyen LH, Tickle TL, Weingart G, Ren B, Schwager EH, Chatterjee S, Thompson KN, Wilkinson JE, Subramanian A, Lu Y, Waldron L, Paulson JN, Franzosa EA, Bravo HC, Huttenhower C. 2021. Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies. PLoS Comput Biol 17:e1009442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Ma B, Wang Y, Zhao K, Stirling E, Lv X, Yu Y, Hu L, Tang C, Wu C, Dong B, Xue R, Dahlgren RA, Tan X, Dai H, Zhu Y-G, Chu H, Xu J. 2024. Biogeographic patterns and drivers of soil viromes. Nat Ecol Evol 8:717–728. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02347-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM. 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760. doi: 10.1126/science.1150195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Barnett SE, Shade A. 2024. Soil viral community dynamics over seven years of heat disturbance: spatial variation exceeds temporal in annually sampled soils. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.27.596044 [DOI]
  • 70. Ramirez KS, Leff JW, Barberán A, Bates ST, Betley J, Crowther TW, Kelly EF, Oldfield EE, Shaw EA, Steenbock C, Bradford MA, Wall DH, Fierer N. 2014. Biogeographic patterns in below-ground diversity in New York City’s Central Park are similar to those observed globally. Proc Biol Sci 281:20141988. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Abrego N, Crosier B, Somervuo P, Ivanova N, Abrahamyan A, Abdi A, Hämäläinen K, Junninen K, Maunula M, Purhonen J, Ovaskainen O. 2020. Fungal communities decline with urbanization-more in air than in soil. ISME J 14:2806–2815. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0732-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Whitehead J, Roy J, Hempel S, Rillig MC. 2022. Soil microbial communities shift along an urban gradient in Berlin, Germany. Front Microbiol 13:972052. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.972052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Grierson J, Flies EJ, Bissett A, Ammitzboll H, Jones P. 2023. Which soil microbiome? Bacteria, fungi, and protozoa communities show different relationships with urban green space type and use-intensity. Sci Total Environ 863:160468. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Aronson MFJ, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH, Katti M, Goddard MA, Lepczyk CA, Warren PS, Williams NSG, Cilliers S, Clarkson B, Dobbs C, Dolan R, Hedblom M, Klotz S, Kooijmans JL, Kühn I, MacGregor-Fors I, McDonnell M, Mörtberg U, Pyšek P, Siebert S, Sushinsky J, Werner P, Winter M. 2014. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc R Soc B 281:20133330. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Reese AT, Savage A, Youngsteadt E, McGuire KL, Koling A, Watkins O, Frank SD, Dunn RR. 2016. Urban stress is associated with variation in microbial species composition-but not richness-in Manhattan. ISME J 10:751–760. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Concepción ED, Moretti M, Altermatt F, Nobis MP, Obrist MK. 2015. Impacts of urbanisation on biodiversity: the role of species mobility, degree of specialisation and spatial scale. Oikos 124:1571–1582. doi: 10.1111/oik.02166 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Fierer N, Barberán A, Laughlin DC. 2014. Seeing the forest for the genes: using metagenomics to infer the aggregated traits of microbial communities. Front Microbiol 5:614. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Chen Y, Neilson JW, Kushwaha P, Maier RM, Barberán A. 2021. Life-history strategies of soil microbial communities in an arid ecosystem. ISME J 15:649–657. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00803-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Westoby M, Nielsen DA, Gillings MR, Litchman E, Madin JS, Paulsen IT, Tetu SG. 2021. Cell size, genome size, and maximum growth rate are near-independent dimensions of ecological variation across bacteria and archaea. Ecol Evol 11:3956–3976. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Roller BRK, Stoddard SF, Schmidt TM. 2016. Exploiting rRNA operon copy number to investigate bacterial reproductive strategies. Nat Microbiol 1:16160. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Fitzpatrick MC, Keller SR. 2015. Ecological genomics meets community-level modelling of biodiversity: mapping the genomic landscape of current and future environmental adaptation. Ecol Lett 18:1–16. doi: 10.1111/ele.12376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Yakovchuk P, Protozanova E, Frank-Kamenetskii MD. 2006. Base-stacking and base-pairing contributions into thermal stability of the DNA double helix. Nucleic Acids Res 34:564–574. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Kraemer R, Kabisch N. 2022. Parks under stress: air temperature regulation of urban green spaces under conditions of drought and summer heat. Front Environ Sci 10. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.849965 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB. 2007. Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88:1354–1364. doi: 10.1890/05-1839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Liao H, Li H, Duan C-S, Zhou X-Y, Luo Q-P, An X-L, Zhu Y-G, Su J-Q. 2022. Response of soil viral communities to land use changes. Nat Commun 13:6027. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33771-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Luo X-Q, Wang P, Li J-L, Ahmad M, Duan L, Yin L-Z, Deng Q-Q, Fang B-Z, Li S-H, Li W-J. 2022. Viral community-wide auxiliary metabolic genes differ by lifestyles, habitats, and hosts. Microbiome 10:190. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01384-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Williamson KE, Radosevich M, Smith DW, Wommack KE. 2007. Incidence of lysogeny within temperate and extreme soil environments. Environ Microbiol 9:2563–2574. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01374.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Knowles B, Silveira CB, Bailey BA, Barott K, Cantu VA, Cobián-Güemes AG, Coutinho FH, Dinsdale EA, Felts B, Furby KA, et al. 2016. Lytic to temperate switching of viral communities. Nature 531:466–470. doi: 10.1038/nature17193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Kosmopoulos JC, Klier KM, Langwig MV, Tran PQ, Anantharaman K. 2023. Viromes vs. mixed community metagenomes: choice of method dictates interpretation of viral community ecology. bioRxiv:2023.10.15.562385. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.15.562385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 90. Fierer N, Leff JW, Adams BJ, Nielsen UN, Bates ST, Lauber CL, Owens S, Gilbert JA, Wall DH, Caporaso JG. 2012. Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:21390–21395. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215210110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Laforest-Lapointe I, Arrieta MC. 2018. Microbial eukaryotes: a missing link in gut microbiome studies. mSystems 3:e00201-17. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00201-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Koerner B, Klopatek J. 2002. Anthropogenic and natural CO2 emission sources in an arid urban environment. Environ Pollut 116 Suppl 1:S45–S51. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00246-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Trammell TLE, Pataki DE, Pouyat RV, Groffman PM, Rosier C, Bettez N, Cavender‐Bares J, Grove MJ, Hall SJ, Heffernan J, Hobbie SE, Morse JL, Neill C, Steele M. 2020. Urban soil carbon and nitrogen converge at a continental scale. Ecol Monogr 90:e01401. doi: 10.1002/ecm.1401 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Vasenev V, Kuzyakov Y. 2018. Urban soils as hot spots of anthropogenic carbon accumulation: review of stocks, mechanisms and driving factors. Land Degrad Dev 29:1607–1622. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2944 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Martin JP. 1971. Decomposition and binding action of polysaccharides in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 3:33–41. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(71)90029-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Golubiewski NE. 2006. Urbanization increases grassland carbon pools: effects of landscaping in Colorado’s front range. Ecol Appl 16:555–571. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0555:uigcpe]2.0.co;2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Ravishankara AR, Daniel JS, Portmann RW. 2009. Nitrous oxide (N2O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science 326:123–125. doi: 10.1126/science.1176985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Arneth A, Denton F, Agus F, Elbehri A, Erb K, Elasha BO, Rahimi M, Rounsevell M, Spence A, Valentini R. 2019. Framing and context. In Climate change and land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Asamoto CK, Rempfert KR, Luu VH, Younkin AD, Kopf SH. 2021. Enzyme-specific coupling of oxygen and nitrogen isotope fractionation of the Nap and Nar nitrate reductases. Environ Sci Technol 55:5537–5546. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Li G, Sun G ‐X., Ren Y, Luo X ‐S., Zhu Y ‐G. 2018. Urban soil and human health: a review. Eur J Soil Sci 69:196–215. doi: 10.1111/ejss.12518 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Liu W, Zhang X, Zhang W, He S, Luo S, Han J, Shen D. 2023. Metal-driven bacterial community variation in urban and suburban park soils of Shanghai, China. Eur J Soil Biol 115:103475. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2023.103475 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Liu Y-R, van der Heijden MGA, Riedo J, Sanz-Lazaro C, Eldridge DJ, Bastida F, Moreno-Jiménez E, Zhou X-Q, Hu H-W, He J-Z, et al. 2023. Soil contamination in nearby natural areas mirrors that in urban greenspaces worldwide. Nat Commun 14:1706. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37428-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Casillas-Vargas G, Ocasio-Malavé C, Medina S, Morales-Guzmán C, Del Valle RG, Carballeira NM, Sanabria-Ríos DJ. 2021. Antibacterial fatty acids: an update of possible mechanisms of action and implications in the development of the next-generation of antibacterial agents. Prog Lipid Res 82:101093. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2021.101093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Guillen-Cruz G, Rodríguez-Sánchez AL, Fernández-Luqueño F, Flores-Rentería D. 2021. Influence of vegetation type on the ecosystem services provided by urban green areas in an arid zone of northern Mexico. Urban For Urban Green 62:127135. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127135 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material. aem.02124-24-s0001.docx.

Figures S1 to S10; Tables S1 and S2.

aem.02124-24-s0001.docx (1.7MB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/aem.02124-24.SuF1

Data Availability Statement

Scripts for the analysis and visualization of data can be found at https://github.com/merytouceda/urban_greenspaces_aridcities. Final data products from processing can be found at 10.5281/zenodo.13152735. Raw metagenomics sequences are available in NCBI under reference number PRJNA1143147.


Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES