Skip to main content
International Journal of Women's Dermatology logoLink to International Journal of Women's Dermatology
letter
. 2025 Aug 20;11(3):e223. doi: 10.1097/JW9.0000000000000223

Utilizing the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) as a depression screening tool for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa

Raveena Ghanshani a, Chelsea Moon a, Aditya Joshi b,c, Sarah E Park d, Vivian Y Shi c, Jennifer L Hsiao e, Katrina H Lee e,*
PMCID: PMC12367044  PMID: 40842849

What is known about this subject in regard to women and their families?

  • Women are disproportionately affected by hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and depression in the United States.

  • Patients with HS have a higher risk of depression.

What is new from this article as messages for women and their families?

  • The Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) may be a quick, feasible, and useful method to screen for depression as part of routine dermatology clinic visits.

Dear Editor,

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder that disproportionately affects women in the United States.1 Patients with HS have demonstrated higher odds of having depression (1.3–4.8 times) compared with patients without HS.2 The Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) is a two-question validated depression screening tool that is recommended in the North American HS comorbidity screening guidelines.2 The PHQ-2 has also been studied in other dermatologic conditions, such as psoriasis3 and atopic dermatitis.4 However, there is a paucity of studies evaluating its use in dermatology clinics for screening patients with HS.

A retrospective chart review was conducted of HS patients seen at the University of Southern California dermatology clinic from January 1, 2024 to June 30, 2024 (IRB # UP-24-00320). Patients with an established HS diagnosis who completed a PHQ-2 within the study window were included. Demographic data and HS disease characteristics were extracted. Differences in characteristics between the positive PHQ-2 cohort (score ≥ 3) versus the negative PHQ-2 cohort (score < 3) were determined using Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the unpaired t test for continuous variables.

A total of 156 patients met the inclusion criteria (Table 1). Of these, the majority (78.8%, 123/156) were female. Over a quarter (26.3%, 41/156) of patients had a positive PHQ-2 score, and of those, the majority (53.7%, 22/41) did not have a pre-existing depression diagnosis. Patients with a positive PHQ-2 score had statistically significant increased quality of life impact (Dermatology Life Quality Index; 17.8 vs 8.3, P < .0001), HS disease activity (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Physician Global Assessment, P = .037), and symptom burden (including pain [P < .0001], itch [P = .004], and drainage [P < .0001] scores) compared with patients with negative PHQ-2 scores (Table 2). There was no significant sex difference between the PHQ-2 positive and negative groups.

Table 1.

Demographics, disease characteristics, and outcome measures

Demographics (N = 156a) No. (%)
Age at time of collection (mean ± SD, range) 37.5 ± 14.6, 14–77
Age at symptom onset (mean ± SD, range) 22.4 ± 12.4, 1–74
Age at HS diagnosis (mean ± SD, range) 30.8 ± 14.6, 10–74
Sex
 Female male 123 (78.8) 33 (21.2)
Race (n = 152)
 White 57 (37.5)
 Black 32 (21.1)
 Asian 10 (6.6)
 Multiracial 3 (2.0)
 Other 50 (32.9)
Ethnicity (n = 144)
 Non-Hispanic Hispanic 100 (69.4) 44 (30.6)
Smoking status (n = 155)
 Never Former Current 117 (75.5) 30 (19.4) 8 (5.2)
Family history of HS (n = 131) 33 (25.2)
BMI classification (n = 152)
 Obese (30+) 84 (55.3)
 Overweight (25 – <30) 37 (24.3)
 Normal weight (18.5 – <25) 29 (19.1)
 Underweight (<18.5) 2 (1.3)
Hurley stage (n = 155)
 I / II / III 20 (12.9) 84 (54.2) 51 (32.9)
Pain score (mean ± SD, range) 3.3 ± 3.1, 0–10
Itch score (mean ± SD, range) 2.9 ± 3.1, 0–10
Drainage (n = 155)
 None Mild Moderate Severe 69 (44.5) 52 (33.5) 26 (16.8) 8 (5.2)
DLQI (mean ± SD, range) (n=152) 10.8 ± 7.8, 0–30

BMI, body mass index; DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; HS, hidradenitis suppurativa; SD, standard deviation.

a

Unless otherwise specified.

Table 2.

Characteristics of patients with positive versus negative Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2a scores

PHQ-2 score ≥3 (N = 41b)
n (%)
PHQ-2 score <3 (N = 115b)
n (%)
P valuec
Age at time of collection (mean ± SD, range) 37.8 ± 15.1, 18–76 37.4 ± 14.5, 14–77 .881
Sex >.999
 Male female 9 (22.0) 32 (78.0) 24 (20.9) 91 (79.1)
Race .171
 White 9/38 (23.7) 48/114 (42.1)
 Black 12/38 (31.6) 20/114 (17.5)
 Asian 2/38 (5.3) 8/114 (7.0)
 Multiracial 1/38 (2.6) 2/114 (1.8)
 Other 14/38 (36.8) 36/114 (31.6)
Ethnicity >.999
 Hispanic Non-Hispanic 12/39 (30.8) 27/39 (69.2) 32/105 (30.5) 73/105 (69.5)
Smoking status .833
 Never Current or Former 32 (78.0) 9 (22.0) 85/114 (74.6) 29/114 (25.4)
Family history of HS 12/32 (37.5) 21/99 (21.2) .099
BMI classification .078
 Underweight (<18.5) 1/40 (2.5) 1/112 (0.9)
 Normal weight (18.5–<25) 4/40 (10.0) 25/112 (22.3)
 Overweight (25–<30) 7/40 (17.5) 30/112 (26.8)
 Obese (30+) 28/40 (70.0) 56/112 (50.0)
Anatomical regions involved
 Face, Ears, and/or Neck 6 (14.6) 14 (12.2) .786
 Chest/Inframammary 9 (22.0) 29 (25.2) .833
 Axillae 28 (68.3) 62 (53.9) .141
 Abdomen 8 (19.5) 11/113 (9.7) .162
 Back 2 (4.9) 6/114 (5.3) >.999
 Groin and/or Buttocks 34 (82.9) 90/112 (80.4) .819
 Legs 15/40 (37.5) 40/112 (35.7) .850
Presence of sinus tracts/tunnels 20/40 (50.0) 49/113 (43.4) .580
Pain score (mean ± SD, range) 5.1 ± 3.0, 0–10 2.7 ± 2.8, 0–10 <.0001
Itch score (mean ± SD, range) 4.1 ± 3.5, 0–10 2.5 ± 2.8, 0–10 .004
Drainage <.0001
 Any drainage No drainage 34 (82.9) 7 (17.1) 52/114 (45.6) 62/114 (54.4)
Hurley stage .612d
 I 5 (12.2) 15/114 (13.2)
 II 21 (51.2) 63/114 (55.3)
 III 15 (36.6) 36/114 (31.6)
HS-PGA .037
 Clear (0) 2/38 (5.3) 21/108 (19.4)
 Minimal (1) 3/38 (7.9) 9/108 (8.3)
 Mild (2) 17/38 (44.7) 44/108 (40.7)
 Moderate (3) 6/38 (15.8) 25/108 (23.1)
 Severe (4) 8/38 (21.1) 7/108 (6.5)
 Very severe (5) 2/38 (5.3) 2/108 (1.9)
DLQI (mean ± SD, range) 17.8 ± 6.8, 2–30 8.3 ± 6.5, 0–28 <.0001
Returning patient at clinic 18 (43.9) 64 (55.7) .208
New patient at clinic 23 (56.1) 51 (44.3) .208
Biologic use at time of PHQ-2 visit 11 (26.8) 41 (35.7) .340

BMI, body mass index; DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; HS, hidradenitis suppurativa; HS-PGA, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Physician’s Global Assessment; PHQ-2, Patient Health Questionnaire-2; SD, standard deviation.

a

The PHQ-2 consists of two questions to assess for the frequency of depressed mood and anhedonia over the past 2 weeks: (1) little interest or pleasure in doing things and (2) feeling down, depressed, or hopeless. Each question is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, and a total score of 3 or higher is considered positive (range, 0–6).

b

Unless otherwise specified.

c

Fisher exact test was used for comparisons of categorical variables, and unpaired t tests were used for continuous variables, unless otherwise specified.

d

Cochran-Armitage Test for Trend utilized.

Our study found that over a quarter of patients with HS seen in our dermatology clinics had a positive PHQ-2 score, aligning with the estimated prevalence of depression in patients with HS of up to 26%.2 Our findings support the HS comorbidity screening guidelines2 recommending depression screening in all patients with HS, regardless of Hurley stage. A prior study that administered the PHQ-9 survey to HS patients found that 33% met criteria for major depression, and no significant relationship was found between PHQ-9 score and patient-reported disease severity.5 HS symptom burden, quality of life impact, and disease activity appeared significantly higher for patients with a positive PHQ-2 score. Future studies are needed to further explore the relationship between depression and HS disease activity, including whether greater disease control can improve mental health outcomes. In clinical practice, if a patient screens positive on the PHQ-2, dermatologists can evaluate for suicidal ideation, provide mental health resources, and facilitate referral to a primary care provider or mental health professional for comprehensive assessment, diagnosis, and management. Limitations of our study include its retrospective, single-center design, small sample size, and predominance of patients with moderate to severe disease, which may impact generalizability.

Our study supports administering the PHQ-2 to all HS patients and suggests that patients with more severe HS disease activity may be at higher risk of a positive PHQ-2 score. This brief two-item questionnaire can be used to identify at-risk patients who may not have been diagnosed with depression or patients with existing depression who may need additional intervention.

Conflicts of interest

The authors made the following disclosures: V.Y.S. is on the board of directors for the Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) Foundation, an advisor for the National Eczema Association, a stock shareholder of Learn Health, and has served as an advisory board member, investigator, speaker, and/or received research funding from Sanofi Genzyme, Regeneron, AbbVie, Genentech, Eli Lilly, Novartis, SUN Pharma, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Incyte, Dermavant, Boehringer Ingelheim, Almirall, Alumis, Aristea Therapeutics, Menlo Therapeutics, Dermira, Burt’s Bees, Galderma, Kiniksa, UCB, Ceraclere, Bain Capital, Target-PharmaSolutions, Castle Bioscience, Altus Lab/cQuell, MYOR, Polyfins Technology, GpSkin, and Skin Actives Scientific. J.L.H. is on the board of directors for the HS Foundation and has served as an advisor, investigator, and/or speaker for AbbVie, Aclaris, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galderma, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, and UCB. K.H.L. has served as an investigator for Novartis. The other authors report no conflict of interest.

Funding

None.

Study approval

The author(s) confirm that any aspect of the work covered in this manuscript that has involved human patients has been conducted with the ethical approval of all relevant bodies.

Author contributions

RG: Participated in data collection and analysis, writing, reviewing, and editing manuscript for this project. CM: Participated in data collection and reviewing and editing manuscript. AJ: Participated in data analysis and reviewing and editing manuscript. SEP: Participated in reviewing and editing manuscript. VYS: Participated in reviewing and editing this manuscript and the conceptualization and administration of this project. JLH and KHL: Participated in data analysis, writing, reviewing, and editing this manuscript, and the conceptualization and administration of this project.

Footnotes

Published online 20 August 2025

References

  • 1.Garg A, Lavian J, Lin G, Strunk A, Alloo A. Incidence of hidradenitis suppurativa in the United States: a sex- and age-adjusted population analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;77:118–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Garg A, Malviya N, Strunk A, et al. Comorbidity screening in hidradenitis suppurativa: evidence-based recommendations from the US and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations. J Am Acad Dermatol 2022;86:1092–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blauvelt A, Gondo GC, Bell S, et al. Psoriasis involving special areas is associated with worse quality of life, depression, and limitations in the ability to participate in social roles and activities. J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis 2023;8:100–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cheng BT, Silverberg JI. Depression and psychological distress in US adults with atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2019;123:179–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Senthilnathan A, Kolli SS, Cardwell LA, Richardson IM, Feldman SR, Pichardo RO. Depression in hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 2019;181:1087–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Women's Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES