Skip to main content
microPublication Biology logoLink to microPublication Biology
. 2025 Aug 6;2025:10.17912/micropub.biology.001724. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.001724

Bifidobacterium longum can degrade the urinary N -glycoprotein Uromodulin.

Elie Al Khoury 1,#, Jean-Philippe Gourdine 2,3,§,#
Reviewed by: Anonymous
PMCID: PMC12368613  PMID: 40852033

Abstract

Uromodulin (UMOD), the most abundant urinary glycoprotein, protects against urinary tract infections through glycan-mediated pathogen binding; nevertheless, its interactions with commensal bladder microbiota (urobiome) remain unexplored. Based on our previous bioinformatics analysis on the urobiome’s capacity to digest host glycans with glycosyl hydrolase genes (GHs), we hypothesized that UMOD may serve as a nutrient source for selected bacteria. We cultured one of them, Bifidobacterium longum, in a minimal medium supplemented solely with purified UMOD. Our results indicate that UMOD is degraded by B. longum , supporting a new role for UMOD in the urobiome’s metabolism.


Figure 1. Probiotics B. longum subsp longum 35624 can digest purified UMOD .


Figure 1.

Probiotics
B. longum subsp longum 35624
can digest purified UMOD

Electropherogram (A) and blots (B-C) of purified Uromodulin . A) Ammonium Bicarbonate precipitation of UMOD by SDS-PAGE revealed by Coomassie Blue B) Lectin-blot with Con A, and C) Immunoblot with mouse Anti-UMOD antibody followed by anti-mouse-Horseradish peroxidase. D) Supernatant of 0.22 µm filtered UMOD treated with MRS media without glucose alone (NO) or with Bifidobacterium longum after 16h (+ BL1 and + BL2) E) ImageJ quantification of UMOD staining (n=3) of D , p-value are statistically significant between control and B. longum (+BL1 and BL2) F) Electropherogram of PCR products on 1% Agarose; MW: Molecular Weight G) Exemplary of a sequence alignments with BLAST using DNA sequences from PCR products showed in F . Legend: MW: Molecular Weight, U: Total Urine Fraction, W: Wash Fraction, FT: Flow Through, UMOD: Eluted UMOD. Black Arrow indicated the expected UMOD band. NO: No treatment; +BL1: with B. longum grown at OD 600nm = 0.15; +BL2: with B. longum grown at OD 600nm = 0.3; BL: B. longum; Control: No DNA.

Description

Uromodulin (UMOD), also known as the Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein, is the most abundant excreted urinary glycoprotein (~50 mg daily); it contains high amounts of N -glycans, averaging 30% of its mass (Li et al., 2021). UMOD is secreted by the kidneys and ends up in the bladder lumen, where it is involved in host defense against bacteria that cause urinary tract infections (UTIs) (Schaeffer et al., 2021). These host-pathogen interactions occur between UMOD’s high-mannose N -glycans and bacterial glycan-binding proteins, such as FimH of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) (Weiss et al., 2020).

UMOD’s interactions with UPEC have been well studied (Pak et al., 2001; Raffi et al., 2005; Serafini-Cessi et al., 2005; Weiss et al., 2020), whereas its interactions with commensal bacteria that do not cause UTIs have not been explored yet. Indeed, urine possesses its microbiota in both healthy and diseased states (Hilt et al., 2014). Many urinary microbes possess enzymes that can digest host glycans (glycosaminoglycans, N -glycans, and O -glycans) with their specific glycoside hydrolases (GHs) and polysaccharide lyases (PLs) (Gourdine et al., 2025; Neugent et al., 2023). As UMOD is abundant and extensively N -glycosylated (Li et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2023; Weiss et al., 2020), it could potentially serve as a primary source of nutrients for bladder bacteria, as seen in other body sites such as the gut (Briliūtė et al., 2019; Garrido et al., 2012).

To test this hypothesis, we utilized a bacterium, Bifidobacterium longum , a member of both the healthy gut and bladder microbiota (Nickel et al., 2022), which possesses the GHs involved in N -glycans degradation (Cordeiro et al., 2019, 2023; Gourdine et al., 2025). As a proof-of-concept, we used an over-the-counter probiotic, B. longum subsp longum 35624, to test UMOD digestion. We first purified UMOD from voided urine samples from healthy female subjects (BIOIVT) using ammonium bicarbonate (ABC) precipitation (Li et al., 2021), followed by SDS-PAGE and staining with Coomassie Blue ( Fig. 1A ). We confirmed UMOD’s high-mannose N -glycosylation and identity, respectively, by Concanavalin A (ConA) Lectin-Blot ( Fig. 1B ) and by anti-UMOD immunoblot ( Fig. 1C ). We then cultured B. longum subsp longum 35624, in a defined minimal medium with UMOD as the sole nutrient source, and checked for UMOD degradation by SDS-PAGE of the supernatants following Garrido et al. (Garrido et al., 2012) ( Fig. 1D ). We quantified the decrease in UMOD staining using ImageJ ( Fig. 1E ). In parallel, we confirmed the identity of the commercially available B. longum by DNA extraction followed by PCR of the 16S rRNA gene and electrophoresis of the PCR products ( Fig. 1F ). PCR products were isolated and sequenced. DNA sequences were aligned using BLAST and the 16S ribosomal RNA sequences database from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (Boratyn et al., 2013) (Fig.1G).

Our results indicate:1) a high-yield purification of UMOD by ABC precipitation with proper high-mannose content ( Fig. 1A- C); 2) a decrease in UMOD staining by SDS-PAGE only in the presence of B. longum ( Fig. 1D- E), and 3) a genetic confirmation of the identity of an over-the-counter probiotic B. longum ( Fig. 1F- G). Overall, these results provide preliminary evidence for a novel role of UMOD in host–microbe interaction as a potential nutrient source for specific commensal bacteria. Our future experiments will involve culturing commensal bacteria isolated from the bladder with UMOD and an in-depth analysis of UMOD N -glycans digestion.

Methods

UMOD Purification

UMOD was purified according to Li et al. (Li et al., 2021). Female urine samples acquired from BIOIVT were mixed with NaCl to achieve a final concentration of 0.58 M. Ammonium bicarbonate was added until a pH of 8 was reached. The resulting solution was stirred at 4℃ overnight, then centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 20 minutes. The pellet was resuspended in 500 µL of deionized water and concentrated by centrifugation with a size exclusion filter (Millipore, molecular cut-off 50 kDa). UMOD purity was assessed by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Blue, or transferred onto nitrocellulose or polyvinylidene membranes. After blocking with Tris Buffer Saline with 0.1% Tween and 5% Bovine Serum Albumin or 1% Non-Fat dry Milk, membranes were incubated with biotinylated Concanavalin A (ConA; 1:1000), followed by Streptavidin-Horse Radish Peroxidase (HRP; Lectin-blot; 1:1000) or anti-UMOD (THP B2; 1:1000), followed by secondary antibody-HRP (m-IgG Fc BP-HRP; Immunoblot; 1:1000). Blots were revealed using a colorimetric method.

Estimation of UMOD degradation

One capsule of probiotic B. longum (~400 mg) was dissolved in 10 mL of Man-Rogosa-Sharpe Broth with 0.05 % thioglycolate (MRS-T) supplemented with 2% glucose filtered at 0.22 µm. The vial was incubated for 15 min at room temperature, then spun at minimal speed for 30 seconds. One volume of supernatant was mixed with one volume of MRS-TG for 48 hours at 37 °C and 250 rpm, until an optical density (OD 600 nm ) of 0.56 was reached. The culture was diluted and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm. Bacterial pellets were resuspended in 200 µL of MRS-T with 2.5 µg/µL of 0.22 µm-filtered UMOD. UMOD alone in 200 µL MRS-T was used as a negative control. Tubes were incubated for 14 hours at 37℃ without agitation, then centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 1 minute. The supernatants were electrophorized (SDS-PAGE) as described previously. Coomassie blue-stained UMOD bands were quantified using ImageJ software (Schneider et al., 2012) in grayscale mode, with a box (x = 1008, y = 765) used to measure the mean pixel values. The same box size was used to select ten random sections of the electrophoregram picture without bands, and then averaged as background. Data were exported into a CSV file, which was then subtracted from 255 (n=3, for each bacterial dilution). Statistical analysis was performed between samples using Student's T-test.

Validation of the probiotics identity

Bifidobacterium longum subsp longum 35624 from Align Probiotics (Procter & Gamble), was acquired at the Albertson store (Lake Oswego, Oregon). One probiotics capsule was resuspended in 9 ml of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and vortexed for 2 minutes (Lewis et al., 2016). One milliliter was centrifuged for 10 min at 7,500 rpm. DNA was extracted from the bacterial pellets using the QIagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit, and amplified by PCR using universal 16S rRNA primers 27F: AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG and 1492R: GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT (Heuer et al., 1997). PCR products were electrophorised in 1% agarose gel in Tris Acetate Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetate (TAE) with SYBR Safe (Invitrogen), visualized under ultraviolet light (Biorad GelDoc). PCR products were extracted using a PCR Clean-up kit (Zymogen) and commercially sequenced (Sanger Sequencing, Azenta Genewiz). DNA sequences (Fasta) were compared to the NCBI database with BLAST (Boratyn et al., 2013).

Reagents

Strain

Genotype

Available from

Bifidobacterium longum subsp longum 35624

Bifidobacterium longum

Align Probiotics (Procter & Gamble)

Lectin-Blot

Specificity

Description

Concanavalin A (ConA-biotinylated)

α-D-mannose and α-D-glucose

Vector Laboratories

Horseradish Peroxidase Avidin D (Elisa Grade)

Biotin Secondary Antibody

Vector Laboratories

Immunoblot

Animal & clonality

Description

anti-UMOD (THP B-2)

anti-UMOD Mouse monoclonal IgG1

Santa Cruz Biotechnology

m-IgG Fc BP-HRP sc-525409

mouse anti-Fc HRP Conjugated

Santa Cruz Biotechnology

Western Blot and Development

Company

Tris-Glycine Running Buffer

Biorad

Non-fat dry milk

1% Blocking Solution

Kroger

Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA)

5% Blocking Solution

Sigma

Tween 20

polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaureate

Biorad

Amersham Hybond-ECL Nitrocellulose Membrane

General Electric Healthcare

10x HRP Color Development Buffer

Biorad

HRP Color Reagent A

Biorad

HRP Color Reagent B

Biorad

Reagent/Kits for Bacterial Analysis

Specificity

Available from

DNA extraction kit

Blood and Soil

QIAgen

PCR kits

Taq PCR Kit E5000S

New England Biolabs.

PCR clean up

DNA Clean & Concentrator-25

Zymogen

100 bp DNA Ladder

New England Biolabs.

Agarose

Biorad

SybrSafe

Thermo

Tris Acetate EDTA (TAE)

10 x Biorad

MRS Broth

Cysteine 0.5 gCasein peptone, tryptic digest 10.00 gMeat extract 10.00 gYeast extract 5.00 gGlucose 20.00 gTween 80 1.00 gK2HPO4 2.00 gNa-acetate 5.00 g(NH4)3 citrate 2.00 gMgSO4 x 7 H2O 0.20 gMnSO4 x H2O 0.05 g0.5 g Sodium thioglycollateDistilled water 1000.00 mlAdjust pH to 6.2 - 6.5.Autoclave using liquid cycle.

Thioglycolate

Sigma

Glucose

Sigma

NaCl

Genesee Scientific

SDS-PAGE

Company

SurePAGE Bis-Tris 10x8

MOPS 4-12%; 12 wells

GenScript

BLUEstain Protein Ladder

11-245 kDa

GoldBio

Tris-MOPS SDS Running Buffer Powder

GenScript

Coomassie Blue

Coomassie 0.1%Ethanol 40%Acetate 10%Distilled water 49.9%

Sigma

UMOD Purification

Company

Ammonium Bicarbonate

Genesee Scientific

SpinFilter Centrifuge Tube

>50 kDa

Millipore

Acknowledgments

Dr. Lindy Gewin (Biology Department, Lewis & Clark College) for the 16SrRNA PCR primers.

The whole CHEM336 Biochemistry class of 2025 at Lewis & Clark College (CHEM336-BCMB 2025) for B. longum DNA extraction and PCR in the Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE): Alix Abrahams, Zarri Abramczyk, Juliana Geppert, Rae Gibson, Abram Hafron, Juliet Howard, Marnie Kahn, Ian Larkin, Hannah Lasky, Lei Letke, Trent Nause, Ella Radvany, Aj Schroeder, Askar Takhirov, Jules Tri, Raevan Wear, and our Teaching Assistant for the year 2025, Bryn Romig.

Lewis & Clark College's Rogers Students: Jessica Martin (2024, BCMB’26) and Malia Heien (2025, BCMB’26).

Arnab Chakraborty for generous lab equipment donations.

Funding Statement

Murdock Charitable Trust and Lewis & Clark College Dean’s start-up.

Extended Data

Description: Partial DNA Sequences of 16S rRNA gene used for Fig 1G.. Resource Type: Dataset. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22002/hq8j1-nj790

References

  1. Boratyn GM, Camacho C, Cooper PS, Coulouris G, Fong A, Ma N, Madden TL, Matten WT, McGinnis SD, Merezhuk Y, Raytselis Y, Sayers EW, Tao T, Ye J, Zaretskaya I. BLAST: a more efficient report with usability improvements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Apr 22;41(Web Server issue):W29–W33. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Briliūtė J, Urbanowicz PA, Luis AS, Baslé A, Paterson N, Rebello O, Hendel J, Ndeh DA, Lowe EC, Martens EC, Spencer DIR, Bolam DN, Crouch LI. Complex N-glycan breakdown by gut Bacteroides involves an extensive enzymatic apparatus encoded by multiple co-regulated genetic loci. Nat Microbiol. 2019 Jun 3;4(9):1571–1581. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0466-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cordeiro RL, Pirolla RAS, Persinoti GF, Gozzo FC, de Giuseppe PO, Murakami MT. N-glycan Utilization by Bifidobacterium Gut Symbionts Involves a Specialist β-Mannosidase. J Mol Biol. 2019 Jan 11;431(4):732–747. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cordeiro Rosa L., Santos Camila R., Domingues Mariane N., Lima Tatiani B., Pirolla Renan A. S., Morais Mariana A. B., Colombari Felippe M., Miyamoto Renan Y., Persinoti Gabriela F., Borges Antonio C., de Farias Marcelo A., Stoffel Fabiane, Li Chao, Gozzo Fabio C., van Heel Marin, Guerin Marcelo E., Sundberg Eric J., Wang Lai-Xi, Portugal Rodrigo V., Giuseppe Priscila O., Murakami Mario T. Mechanism of high-mannose N-glycan breakdown and metabolism by Bifidobacterium longum. Nature Chemical Biology. 2022 Nov 28;19(2):218–229. doi: 10.1038/s41589-022-01202-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Garrido Daniel, Nwosu Charles, Ruiz-Moyano Santiago, Aldredge Danielle, German J. Bruce, Lebrilla Carlito B., Mills David A. Endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidases from Infant Gut-associated Bifidobacteria Release Complex N-glycans from Human Milk Glycoproteins. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2012 Sep 1;11(9):775–785. doi: 10.1074/mcp.m112.018119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gourdine Jean-Philippe F., Pacentine Itallia V., Barstad Alec, Dahl Erin M., Gregory W. Tom, Wolfe Alan J., Sysoeva Tatyana A., Karstens Lisa. Complex carbohydrates catabolism capacity of bladder microbiota inhabiting healthy and overactive female bladders. 2025 Apr 4; doi: 10.1101/2025.04.02.646827. [DOI]
  7. Heuer H, Krsek M, Baker P, Smalla K, Wellington E M. Analysis of actinomycete communities by specific amplification of genes encoding 16S rRNA and gel-electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1997 Aug 1;63(8):3233–3241. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.8.3233-3241.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lewis Zachery T., Shani Guy, Masarweh Chad F., Popovic Mina, Frese Steve A., Sela David A., Underwood Mark A., Mills David A. Validating bifidobacterial species and subspecies identity in commercial probiotic products. Pediatric Research. 2015 Nov 16;79(3):445–452. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Li Haiying, Kostel Stephen A., DiMartino Shannon E., Hashemi Gheinani Ali, Froehlich John W., Lee Richard S. Uromodulin Isolation and Its N -Glycosylation Analysis by NanoLC-MS/MS . Journal of Proteome Research. 2021 Mar 2;20(5):2662–2672. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c01053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lin Tianhai, Chen Zhuo, Luo Mengqi, Zhao Yang, Zeng Wenjuan, Zheng Shanshan, Su Tao, Zhong Yi, Wang Shisheng, Jin Youmei, Hu Liqiang, Zhao Wanjun, Li Jiaxu, Wang Xuanyi, Wu Changwei, Li Dapeng, Liu Fang, Li Guisen, Yang Hao, Zhang Yong. Characterization of site-specific N -glycosylation signatures of isolated uromodulin from human urine . The Analyst. 2023;148(20):5041–5049. doi: 10.1039/d3an01018j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Neugent Michael L., Hulyalkar Neha V., Kumar Ashwani, Xing Chao, Zimmern Philippe E., Shulaev Vladimir, De Nisco Nicole J. Urinary Glycosaminoglycans Are Associated with Recurrent UTI and Urobiome Ecology in Postmenopausal Women. ACS Infectious Diseases. 2023 Mar 21;9(4):1022–1032. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.3c00027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nickel J. Curtis, Stephens Alisa, Ackerman A. Lenore, Anger Jennifer T., Lai Henry H., Ehrlich Garth D. The healthy urinary microbiome in asymptomatic participants in the MAPP Network Study: Relation to gender, age, and menopausal status. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2022 Apr 11;16(9) doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pak Joanne, Pu Yongbing, Zhang Zhong-Ting, Hasty David L., Wu Xue-Ru. Tamm-Horsfall Protein Binds to Type 1 Fimbriated Escherichia coli and Prevents E. coli from Binding to Uroplakin Ia and Ib Receptors. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001 Mar 1;276(13):9924–9930. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m008610200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Raffi Hajamohideen S., Bates, Jr. James M., Laszik Zoltan, Kumar Satish. Tamm-Horsfall Protein Acts as a General Host-Defense Factor against Bacterial Cystitis. American Journal of Nephrology. 2005;25(6):570–578. doi: 10.1159/000088990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schaeffer Céline, Devuyst Olivier, Rampoldi Luca. Uromodulin: Roles in Health and Disease. Annual Review of Physiology. 2021 Feb 10;83(1):477–501. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-031620-092817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Serafini-Cessi Franca, Monti Angela, Cavallone Daniela. N-Glycans carried by Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein have a crucial role in the defense against urinary tract diseases. Glycoconjugate Journal. 2005 Nov 1;22(7-9):383–394. doi: 10.1007/s10719-005-2142-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weiss Gregor L., Stanisich Jessica J., Sauer Maximilian M., Lin Chia-Wei, Eras Jonathan, Zyla Dawid S., Trück Johannes, Devuyst Olivier, Aebi Markus, Pilhofer Martin, Glockshuber Rudi. Architecture and function of human uromodulin filaments in urinary tract infections. Science. 2020 Aug 21;369(6506):1005–1010. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz9866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Description: Partial DNA Sequences of 16S rRNA gene used for Fig 1G.. Resource Type: Dataset. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22002/hq8j1-nj790


Articles from microPublication Biology are provided here courtesy of California Institute of Technology

RESOURCES