Skip to main content
NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes logoLink to NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes
. 2025 Aug 22;11:168. doi: 10.1038/s41522-025-00814-7

Virome characteristics of small mammals and their associated environments in pastoral areas on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

Xiang Lu 1,2,#, Qing Zhang 1,3,#, Haisheng Wu 1,3,#, Likai Ji 1,2,#, Yongshun Wang 1,3, Juan Xu 4, Jia Liu 3, Jiamin Pan 1, Xiaojie Jiang 1, Yuan Xi 1, Shixing Yang 1,2, Quan Shen 1, Xiaochun Wang 1,2, Ping Wu 1, Yuwei Liu 1, Xiao Ma 3,✉, Chenglin Zhou 4,✉, Tongling Shan 5,✉, Wen Zhang 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC12371082  PMID: 40841544

Abstract

The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), known for its rich biodiversity and unique ecological niche, harbors numerous endemic species and serves as a reservoir for both established human pathogens and numerous poorly characterized pathogens. Despite certain advances, virological research on small mammals in this region is still limited. In this study, we investigated the diversity and evolution of viral communities in plateau voles, plateau pikas, and their associated environmental samples collected near pastoral settlements on the QTP. Our findings revealed 291,165 species-level viral operational taxonomic units, highlighting a diverse array of bacteriophages. In addition, we further characterized 774 novel eukaryotic viral genomes, primarily classified into 22 established viral families. Among them, 95.5% shared less than 80% amino acid sequence identity with known viruses, some of which may represent new genera or species. Furthermore, some eukaryotic viruses display distinct tissue distribution patterns in these small mammals. Notably, we identified 32 mammalian viruses capable of cross-species transmission, among which 22 are considered potential spillover risks, and most of them were detected for the first time in plateau pikas and plateau voles. Overall, this study expands the viral spectrum of small mammals on the QTP and broadens the host range of previously identified viruses, emphasizing the need for further research into their potential public health implications.

Subject terms: Microbial communities, Environmental microbiology, Virology

Introduction

Emerging zoonotic diseases of wildlife origin caused by previously unknown pathogens have become a major global public health challenge1. The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), one of the world’s most biodiverse regions and a habitat for numerous endemic species, is home to widely distributed and abundant small mammals, including lagomorphs and rodents, which are closely associated with humans. They play a crucial role in ecosystems by facilitating energy transfer and nutrient cycling, dispersing seeds, and contributing to biodiversity maintenance2. However, as dominant species in this region, the plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) and plateau vole (Neodon fuscus) serve as key reservoirs for the transmission of infectious diseases such as echinococcosis and plague3,4, which can spread to humans through predation, excretion, and various other pathways5.

To date, research on plateau pikas and plateau voles on the QTP has primarily focused on parasites and gut microbiota2,6–10. However, virological research remains limited, with only a few studies, such as Zhu et al., having characterized the RNA virome of birds and small mammals on the QTP11. Plateau pikas have been identified as potential hosts for influenza viruses, including H7N212, H9N213, and H5N114. Recently, Zhu et al. identified a novel alphacoronavirus, plateau pika coronavirus (PPCoV) P83, in gut and respiratory samples from plateau pikas15. Likewise, Xu et al. detected coronaviruses in plateau pikas and Gansu pikas, classifying them as variants of pika alphacoronaviruses or betacoronaviruses16. Luo et al. characterized a novel arenavirus, plateau pika virus (PPV)1, from plateau pikas on the QTP. These findings have not only revealed pathogenic viruses hidden in pikas but also suggested the possible presence of numerous previously undiscovered viruses in this region, which may circulate among a broader range of hosts. Therefore, these findings underscore the urgent need for systematic virome investigations in small mammals on the QTP. Additionally, studies have demonstrated that plateau pikas influence soil microbial networks and the multifunctionality of ecosystems through their activities, functioning as “ecosystem engineers”17. This ecological impact is further reflected in the higher plant species richness observed in regions inhabited by pikas compared to pika-free areas18. Thus, analyzing environmental samples from the surroundings of these animals’ burrows can help assess whether viruses persist in the ecosystem and spread through excretions, bodily fluids, or direct contact, thereby offering insights into potential cross-host transmission.

In this study, we captured plateau pikas and plateau voles active around pastoral settlements on the QTP and conducted a comprehensive virome analysis. Additionally, we collected samples from arthropods, plants, fungi, and soil in close proximity to burrow sites, as well as fresh feces from yaks grazing near these sites. Our aim was to identify novel viruses that may be hidden in these environments, characterize the host range and distribution of known viruses, and evaluate the potential spillover risks of viruses carried by these small mammals.

Results

Virome of QTP small mammals and their associated environments

Virome analysis was conducted on samples from small mammals (plateau voles and plateau pikas) and their associated environments in multiple pastoral settlements across three county-level administrative regions at an average altitude of 4133 m (see Methods for details). Environment samples were collected from areas surrounding animal burrows, specifically near capture sites where burrows were visible. Notably, samples from Chengduo had the highest biodiversity, while in Jiuzhi, plateau voles were found only in barren landscapes slightly farther from pastoral settlements (Fig. 1a). A total of 392,069 viral contigs were identified across all samples following de novo assembly (Fig. 1b). After deduplication and clustering, these contigs were classified into 291,165 species-, 76,106 genus-, and 28,704 family-level viral operational taxonomic units (vOTUs). The viral species richness of these samples was assessed using rarefaction curves (Supplementary Fig. 1). As the number of sampled sequences increased, the curves gradually approached a plateau, suggesting that the sequencing depth was sufficient to capture the majority of viral diversity present in these libraries. This indicates that additional sequencing would yield only a limited number of new species. Only 15.7% of the vOTUs were successfully annotated at the family level, comprising 1.9% vertebrate-associated viruses and 13.8% other annotated viruses. Among the vertebrate viruses, the most frequently assigned families were Retroviridae, Picobirnaviridae, Smacoviridae, Parvoviridae, and Circoviridae. The other annotated viruses were dominated by Microviridae and several families within the class Caudoviricetes, such as Intestiviridae, Steigviridae, Herelleviridae, and Suoliviridae, which are mainly associated with prokaryotic hosts (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1. Map of sampling sites from this study.

Fig. 1

a An overview of the sampling sites in Qinghai Province, China, with three distinct sampling locations indicated by pie charts. The top-left image was taken by Qing Zhang. b The number of viral contigs and species-level vOTUs clustered from different sample categories, with the phylogenetic relationships of the samples indicated. c The distribution of 291,165 species-level vOTUs is plotted based on their length and GC content. The bar charts at the top show the distribution of these vOTUs further clustered at the genus and family levels. Dots are colored according to the number of vOTUs. The pie chart shows the proportion of well-annotated vOTUs across different classifications.

The assignment of most sequences to bacteriophages (phages) was expected (Fig. 2a). Overall, eukaryotic viruses constitute a minor component of microbial communities, yet their potential impacts are often evident19. Identifying these viruses, especially novel eukaryotic viruses, is essential for anticipating and mitigating potential future threats. We assembled 774 complete or nearly complete eukaryotic viral genomes from the majority of animal tissue and environmental samples included in this study, with nearly complete genomes being those that contain at least one annotatable conserved motif. These viruses shared sequence identity with 22 established viral families known to infect vertebrates, invertebrates, plants, and fungi, or with two groups of unclassified Circular Replication (Rep)-Encoding Single-Stranded (CRESS)-DNA viruses and unclassified RNA viruses, 95.5% of which shared less than 80% amino acid (aa) sequence identity with any known viruses (Supplementary Data 1).

Fig. 2. Comparison of viral community composition and diversity across different regions and animal tissues.

Fig. 2

a Heatmap of viral families in the collected samples. The differently colored bands at the top of the heatmap indicate the sample sources, while the row names on the right represent the names of viral families. The data is log-transformed with a base of log10. b The left panel presents boxplots of Shannon diversity (alpha diversity) of viral communities in the overall tissues of plateau pikas and voles. The right panel presents boxplots of Shannon diversity of viral communities across four tissue types from plateau voles and plateau pikas. The Shannon index was analyzed using the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test. Statistical significance was defined as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001; comparisons were made between the two groups. c The left panel presents boxplots of Shannon diversity of viral communities across different plateau pika tissues. The right panel shows the PCoA analysis, which revealed significant differences among viral communities from different plateau pika tissues. The two principal components accounted for 25% (PC1) and 19% (PC2) of the total variation, respectively. Each symbol represents an individual sample. d The boxplots show the Shannon index of viral communities across different vole tissues in three sampling regions. e The PCoA analysis separately illustrates the significant differences in viral communities among different plateau vole tissues across sampling sites, as well as the variations in viral communities of the four tissue types across the three sampling sites.

Virome diversity of plateau pikas and plateau voles

To gain a deeper understanding of the virome in plateau pikas and plateau voles, we constructed separate libraries for each individual’s liver, lung, intestine, and heart/spleen/kidney/brain (HSKB) samples. The heart, spleen, kidney, and brain samples were pooled into a single library, as these tissues were expected to yield very low viral loads, thereby improving detection sensitivity. Overall, the viral diversity in plateau vole tissues was higher than that in plateau pika tissues (Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test, P < 0.0001), a consistent pattern observed across four distinct tissue types (Fig. 2b). This could be attributed to the smaller sample size of plateau pikas relative to plateau voles. Moreover, plateau pika samples were collected only from pastoral settlements in a single county-level administrative region, whereas plateau voles inhabited more biodiverse environments. Including a larger number of samples and incorporating sampling sites with greater geographic and ecological diversity may alter the currently observed virome landscape.

In plateau pikas, the viral diversity in intestinal samples was significantly higher than that in other tissues, which is expected, as the intestine is typically the most virus-rich organ in most mammals20 and humans21,22. However, there was no significant difference in viral diversity among lung, liver, and HSKB samples (Fig. 2c). Additionally, Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) revealed that the viral composition of intestinal tissues was distinctly different from that of other tissues. Notably, although α diversity did not differ significantly among lung, liver, and HSKB samples, their overall viral community structures showed significant differences in β diversity analysis. This indicated that while these tissues had similar viral richness and evenness, their community compositions remained distinct.

Similarly, plateau voles from Chengduo and Gande exhibited a viral diversity pattern comparable to that of plateau pikas (Fig. 2d, e). However, in voles sampled from Jiuzhi, the distribution of viral diversity followed a different trend, with significant differences observed only between the intestine and lung tissues. Furthermore, PCoA analysis failed to distinguish the overall viral community structures among different tissues in Jiuzhi voles. Given this, increasing the sample size may help reveal a clearer diversity pattern. Additionally, we observed significant β diversity differences in the same tissue of plateau voles across different regions, which may be partially attributed to the interaction between the voles and their surrounding environments.

Highly diverse phages harbored in QTP small mammals and their associated environments

Phages are widely prevalent across diverse habitats and play a critical role in maintaining bacterial community dynamics and ecosystem stability. The majority of the annotated viruses in this study were phages (over 70%), primarily belonging to Caudoviricetes and Microviridae, while the unannotated sequences (84.3%) may also represent a substantial proportion of phages (Fig. 1c). Caudoviricetes comprise a diverse class of tailed double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) phages found in various environments and were highly represented in gut metagenomes23. To investigate the evolutionary patterns of this group in QTP small mammals and their associated environments, we generated a phylogenetic tree using a concatenated alignment of 77 protein-coding marker genes24 (Fig. 3a). After excluding genomes with insufficient data (fewer than three markers or less than 5% alignment representation), the final phylogenetic tree consisted of 4380 genus-level viral genomes, with reference genomes sourced from the most comprehensive human gut virome database, MGV25. Compared to the MGV database, this study identified 830 putative novel vOTUs at the genus level, with an average length of 36,859 bp. Notably, as more viral genomic data become available, the resolution and accuracy of detecting novel vOTUs are expected to improve. Among them, 235 were from plateau pikas, 213 from plateau voles, 187 from yak feces, 72 from arthropod samples, 62 from plant and fungal samples, and 61 from soil samples. Intestinal vOTUs were the most abundant, totaling 609 (73.4%), with 220 from plateau pikas, 202 from plateau voles, and 187 from yaks. Moreover, Caudoviricetes were not detected in the HSKB and lung samples of plateau pikas, nor in the HSKB samples of plateau voles. Additionally, the majority of the vOTUs were predicted to be assigned to host phyla Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria, while only two genomes were classified as archaeaphages. The percentage of lysogenic viruses varied across host phyla, with most exhibiting a low proportion (Supplementary Data 1). Microviridae, a family of viruses that infect bacteria, is widely recognized as one of the most diverse and globally distributed viral families26. They inhabit a variety of environments, including the guts of animals and humans27,28, insects29, freshwater30, seawater31, and sediments32. A total of 512 distinct major capsid proteins (MCPs) were identified at the genus level, with an average sequence length of 514 aa (Supplementary Data 1). Among these, 360 MCPs exhibited less than 60% aa sequence identity with their closest matches in the GenBank database. Furthermore, network clustering analysis showed that a subset of MCPs identified in this study grouped into several major clusters with known sequences, the majority of which could not be classified into specific viral genera or species. In contrast, another group of MCPs formed clusters consisting of a single or a few MCPs, suggesting novel genera (Supplementary Fig. 2). The evolutionary diversity of phages is thought to be driven by horizontal gene transfer with other microbes or host genomes33. To explore how gut viruses differ in their evolutionary relationships and functional potential among plateau voles, plateau pikas, and yaks living in the same region, we examined the relationship between nucleotide-level genetic distance and gene content similarity among viral genomes from these hosts (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Data 1). Overall, gut viruses from different hosts showed substantial nucleotide-level divergence and low gene content similarity. In contrast, the viromes of plateau pikas and plateau voles displayed greater functional similarity, suggesting a closer ecological relationship between the two species. Furthermore, the moderate gene content similarity observed between the viromes of pikas and yaks may indicate potential ecological interactions or viral exchange.

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic analysis of Caudoviricetes and cross-host evolutionary relationships of gut viromes.

Fig. 3

a To enhance visualization, only one representative genome is shown for each genus-level vOTU. Branch colors indicate their sources: black represents lineages from a previously published study, while green denotes those unique to this study. The outer rings display four metadata attributes for each vOTU. b The scatter plot illustrates the relationship between pairwise nucleotide distance and gene content similarity among gut viromes of plateau pikas, plateau voles, and yaks. Each dot represents a comparison between two viral genomes derived from different host species. The x-axis shows the nucleotide distance, while the y-axis indicates gene content similarity, reflecting the extent of functional overlap between viral genomes.

Phage sequence-derived genes were annotated with the KEGG search function in eggNOG-mapper v2, enabling the investigation of their potential roles (Supplementary Data 2). To focus on host-associated phages and reduce environmental interference, we restricted our analysis to those detected in plateau pikas and voles. As expected, these functional genes were predominantly detected in intestinal tissues (Fig. 4a). The results revealed that the majority of annotated genes were associated with genetic information processing, particularly its subcategory, replication and repair, with a significant portion remaining unclassified, indicating their critical roles in preserving genomic integrity and cellular functions. To enhance the visualization of relationships between these genes and host tissues, we included only genes with a weight ≥ 50 in the network diagram. Among these genes, those associated with pyrimidine metabolism (thyX and dut) and DNA replication (dnaE and polA) had the highest numbers and were detected more frequently in the intestinal tissues of plateau pikas than in those of plateau voles (Fig. 4b). Interestingly, although more plateau vole samples were included in this study compared to plateau pikas, and their intestinal tissues exhibited greater viral diversity (Fig. 2b), these genes were still present in higher numbers in plateau pikas. One possible explanation is the differences in adaptive strategies between plateau pikas and plateau voles for high-altitude adaptation.

Fig. 4. Functional gene analysis of viruses in plateau pika and vole tissues.

Fig. 4

a The bar chart on the left shows the number of functional genes in different plateau pika and vole tissue categories annotated based on the eggNOG database, while the pie chart on the right illustrates the classification of these functional genes. b Network diagram of viral functional genes and their source tissues. Arrows always point from genes to their sources, with genes shown as red circles and sources as green circles. The thickness and color intensity of the arrows are positively correlated with the degree of association between genes and their sources.

Evolutionary diversification of novel eukaryotic viruses

We manually validated the genomes of 774 viral sequences and inferred phylogenetic trees based on RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) sequences for RNA viruses, replicase or other non-structural proteins for DNA viruses, and full-length ORF1 sequences for anelloviruses (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Data 1). The 22 unedited phylogenetic trees with detailed sequence information are available in Supplementary Fig. 3.

Fig. 5. Phylogenetic analysis of 22 major viral families.

Fig. 5

The phylogenetic trees were primarily constructed based on the amino acid sequences of RdRp for RNA viruses and replicase and other non-structural proteins for DNA viruses. Additionally, following ICTV classification guidelines, the phylogenetic tree for Anelloviridae was constructed using the nucleotide sequences of the complete ORF1.

Positive-sense ssRNA viruses and retrotranscribing RNA viruses

A total of 99 positive-sense ssRNA viruses were detected, classified into eleven viral families (Arteriviridae, Deltaflexiviridae, Flaviviridae, Astroviridae, Benyviridae, Hepeviridae, Dicistroviridae, Picornaviridae, Mitoviridae, Nodaviridae, and Iflaviridae), as well as Betaflexi-like viruses. In addition, 13 members of the Retroviridae family (ssRNA-RT viruses) were also identified. Within the Arteriviridae family, four viruses closely related to Jingmen rodent arterivirus 1 were identified in the lungs of plateau voles from Gande and Chengduo, sharing 84.3–85.3% aa sequence identity with this virus. Interestingly, viral fragments were also detected in the liver and HSKB samples of voles, suggesting potential systemic spread within the host (see the section ‘Cross-species transmission of viruses’ for details). Twenty-four viruses were classified into the Flaviviridae family, with phylogenetic analysis effectively grouping them into distinct clades based on host preference. Among them, two Pegivirus viruses shared 83.8–83.9% aa sequence identity with Phaiomys leucurus pegivirus. Additionally, 18 Hepacivirus viruses were identified as being related to rodent hepacivirus, sharing 67.4–87% aa sequence identity. Both Pegivirus and Hepacivirus viruses were detected in the liver and lungs of plateau voles. Two hepeviruses identified from the intestines of Chengduo plateau voles shared less than 55% aa sequence identity with any known viruses, suggesting the presence of novel viral species or possibly even new genera. Similarly, 24 picornavirus-related sequences were identified in the intestines of plateau pikas and voles, as well as in arthropods and fungi, indicating that these viruses occupy the ecological interface between QTP small mammals and their associated environments. Some of these sequences may represent novel species, as they formed distinct phylogenetic clades. Four astrovirus-related viruses were detected. Among them, two were identified in the intestines of plateau voles, sharing 67–68.8% aa sequence identity with their closest matches from voles in South Dakota. The other two viruses, detected in arthropod samples, exhibited low identity to known viruses and were therefore classified into the Astro-like group. Moreover, novel viruses related to Iflaviridae, Deltaflexiviridae, Betaflexiviridae, Dicistroviridae, Benyviridae, and Mitoviridae were detected, with natural hosts primarily including invertebrates, plants, fungi, and insects. However, these viruses were only sporadically identified in small mammals, suggesting that they may have a limited role in the interactions between QTP small mammals and their associated environments. In contrast, Nodaviridae appears to be more frequently involved in viral transmission between small mammals and their associated environments.

Negative-sense ssRNA viruses

A total of 12 negative-sense ssRNA viruses associated with the families Chuviridae, Rhabdoviridae, Xinmoviridae, and Phenuiviridae were identified from arthropods, plants, and fungi. Among the five viruses associated with Chuviridae, one shared 74.7% aa sequence identity with a Chuvirus previously identified in the feces of a rat from the QTP, suggesting it represents a novel species. The other four exhibited 34–45.8% aa sequence identity with their closest matches in GenBank, indicating that they likely represent four distinct novel genera34. A novel virus belonging to Rhabdoviridae was identified, with a complete genome length of 14,494 bp. It shared 36.7% aa sequence identity with its closest match, which was originally detected in Lasius neglectus. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that it formed an independent clade between the genera Alphahymrhavirus and Betapaprhavirus, suggesting that it may represent a novel genus or a higher taxonomic rank. Similarly, a virus with a full genome length of 13,447 bp was classified within the Xinmoviridae family. It shared 38% aa sequence identity with its closest match, Soldier fly-associated anphevirus, identified in Inopus flavus. Given its low sequence identity and phylogenetic analysis, it is likely to represent at least a novel species. Additionally, five viruses related to Phenuiviridae were identified. Among them, one virus shared 95.7% aa sequence identity with its closest match, while the remaining four exhibited less than 55% identity with their respective closest matches. Based on phylogenetic analysis, each of these four viruses likely represents a novel species.

dsRNA viruses

In this study, a total of 154 picobirnaviruses were identified, with 144 derived from the intestines of plateau pikas and voles, 6 from the lungs of voles, 1 from the liver of a pika, and the remaining 3 from environmental samples. These viruses exhibited aa sequence identities ranging from 25.2% to 79.8% with their most closely related sequences in GenBank, including those detected in pigs, foxes, chickens, marmots, mongooses, and cattle. Notably, the vast majority of sequences were detected in the intestines of small mammals, suggesting an association with the host’s diet. However, the relatively low number of viruses detected in environmental samples, compared with the number found in the host intestines, suggests that these viruses are primarily transmitted among mammals rather than being widely circulating in the environment.

ssDNA and dsDNA viruses

A total of 63 sequences related to Parvoviridae were identified from the intestines of plateau pikas, the intestines and HSKB of plateau voles, as well as from arthropods, plants, fungi, and soil samples. Among them, 49 sequences shared less than 70% aa sequence identity with their closest matches. Additionally, these parvoviruses span a wide taxonomic range from the subfamilies Densovirinae to Parvovirinae, suggesting their widespread distribution on the QTP. Moreover, four viruses belonging to the genus Mastadenovirus were detected in the tissues of plateau pikas and voles. Additionally, four viruses related to the family Polyomaviridae were identified from the liver and lungs of plateau voles, the lungs of plateau pikas, and arthropods. Phylogenetic analysis based on the aa sequences of the large tumor antigen revealed that these viruses clustered into distinct evolutionary clades.

Two novel monophyletic clades of Anelloviridae

A total of 25 viruses belonging to the family Anelloviridae were identified, all derived from various tissues of plateau pikas and voles. Interestingly, BLASTn searches of their ORF1 nucleotide sequences returned no significant matches. Additionally, phylogenetic analysis revealed that these viruses formed two distinct clades, comprising 5 and 20 viruses, respectively. These two clades should at least be considered to represent two distinct new genera.

Unclassified RdRp-encoding RNA and CRESS DNA viruses

We recovered 108 RdRp sequences from the dataset, which exhibit a notable degree of divergence from all currently known RdRp sequences, making it difficult to assign them to any established viral taxonomy. Sequence similarity network analysis revealed that most sequences formed distinct clusters, suggesting an evolutionary relationship with known but yet-to-be-classified viruses (Fig. 6). In contrast, some isolated RdRp sequences may represent new viral species, genera, or families. CRESS DNA viruses are widely distributed and have been detected across a wide range of eukaryotic hosts35. These viruses display remarkable genetic diversity and continue to proliferate without signs of decline36. To investigate the diversity of CRESS DNA viruses in small mammals and their associated environments on the QTP, we recovered 292 Rep protein sequences from the dataset. These sequences included 11 circoviruses, 15 genomoviruses, 4 geminiviruses, 25 smacoviruses, and 237 unclassified CRESS DNA viruses. Further sequence analysis showed that 177 Rep proteins exhibited less than 60% aa sequence identity in comparison to known viruses, suggesting that they may represent potentially novel viral species. Notably, CRESS DNA viruses exhibited distinct host specificity. Compared to other eukaryotic viruses, smacoviruses were detected at significantly higher proportions in yak feces, whereas the representation of other eukaryotic viruses in yak feces was relatively low. This finding suggests that the viromes of the yak gut and small mammals have limited ecological interactions.

Fig. 6. Sequence similarity networks of two unclassified virus groups.

Fig. 6

Viruses identified with RdRp / Rep sequences but unable to be classified were included in the sequence similarity network analysis along with their best matches from the current GenBank database and other representative viruses.

Tissue-associated differences in the presence and composition of eukaryotic viruses in plateau pikas and plateau voles

To better understand the distribution of eukaryotic viruses across different tissues in plateau pikas and plateau voles, we clustered sequences annotated as eukaryotic viruses using 95% ANI across 90% of the shortest assembled contig to define species-level clusters. Consequently, these viruses were classified into 14 viral families and two unclassified viral groups (Supplementary Data 3). The heatmap illustrates the distribution of different viral groups across various tissues (Fig. 7a). Notably, the unclassified Cressdnaviricota family was detected in a large proportion of samples but appeared more frequently in the intestinal tissues of voles (Supplementary Fig. 4). Additionally, as noted earlier, smacoviruses were more commonly found in yak feces. Flaviviridae was mainly present in the liver and lungs of voles, whereas Anelloviridae was found more often in pika tissues than in vole tissues. More specifically, Adenoviridae was detected only in the intestinal tissues or the HSKB of voles, with no evidence of cross-tissue transmission. It is worth noting that analyzing the heart, spleen, kidney, and brain separately when constructing libraries could provide a clearer picture of their distribution. Arteriviridae appears to be exclusively associated with voles. Additionally, Anelloviridae was widely detected across multiple tissues and individuals of both plateau pikas and plateau voles, suggesting a strong capacity for tissue-level transmission, though no clear evidence of cross-species transmission has been observed. Similarly, Circoviridae and several yet-to-be-classified viruses exhibited comparable distribution patterns (Supplementary Fig. 4). Additionally, two representative contigs from the Retroviridae family, Hvole267_72163 (2978 bp) and Hvole267_1029205 (2974 bp), were originally detected in the intestine of plateau voles and share only 32.1% nucleotide identity, yet were unexpectedly found across various tissues of plateau pikas, suggesting the possibility of cross-species transmission (Fig. 7b).

Fig. 7. Mammalian viruses with potential for cross-species transmission.

Fig. 7

a Circle heatmap illustrating the associations between viruses and host samples (tissues). Each circle represents a virus-host association, and the circle size is positively associated with the number of viruses detected in each host sample. b The heatmap on the left shows the distribution of viral families detected in various tissues of plateau voles and pikas. Color intensity represents the number of samples in which each viral family was identified. The heatmap on the right highlights two species-level representative contigs initially detected in the intestines of plateau voles that were also identified in different tissues of plateau pikas, indicating potential cross-species transmission. c The cross-species transmission pattern of 47 known viruses was mapped based on the data generated in this study and viral records from the NCBI database. The Latin names of mammalian samples collected in this study are displayed in yellow at the top of the figure. Blue circles indicate the presence of these viruses in different hosts (see Supplementary Data 4 for details). On the right, purple and skyblue circles represent the presence of these viruses in plateau pika and vole tissues, respectively.

Cross-species transmission of viruses

To evaluate the viruses identified in this study, particularly those associated with vertebrates and their potential public health impact, we focused on viral taxa with cross-species transmission potential (detected in at least two mammalian species) and spillover risk (detected in mammalian hosts from at least two distinct orders)37. Species-level classification of known eukaryotic viruses was based on ≥80% amino acid identity in conserved proteins38,39. All known viruses included in the analysis were obtained from viral records in the NCBI database and the corresponding literature (Supplementary Data 4). We identified 32 mammalian viruses capable of cross-species transmission, 22 of which are considered at risk of spillover, including Rodent hepacivirus, Rodent hepatovirus, Canine parvovirus, Porcine picobirnavirus, and Canine-associated porprismacovirus, among others (Fig. 7c). The genomic organizations of these viruses can be found in Supplementary Fig. 5.

Notably, some viruses that had not been detected in other regions since their initial identification were also found in this study. Adenovirus myodes38640 (with spillover risk) was identified in Myodes glareolus from Ukraine; Chaetfec virus (with cross-species transmission potential) was detected in the feces of Chaetodipus sp. in Arizona, USA; and Mosavirus A2 was initially identified in the feces of Coracias garrulus collected in Hungary40. Mosavirus A2 is likely transmitted via bird droppings, raising the possibility that plateau voles may have acquired the virus through environmental exposure. In this study, however, Mosavirus A2 and Chaetfec virus were detected in the lungs and intestines of plateau voles (Supplementary Data 4). Additionally, some viruses are estimated to have spread globally, including Rodent hepacivirus, Porcine picobirnavirus, Rodent hepatovirus, Wigfec virus, Circoviridae sp. isolate ctda274, and Lama-associated gemycircularvirus 1.

We identified canine parvovirus (Protoparvovirus carnivoran1) in various tissues of plateau voles collected from three county-level administrative regions, as well as in yak feces. This virus was previously identified in canine fecal samples obtained from the QTP41. Additionally, several viruses that had been previously identified in Rodentia, including Jingmen rodent arterivirus 1, Mamastrovirus sp. isolate XZS01, Phaiomys leucurus pegivirus, Rodent hepacvirus, Rodent hepatovirus, Chaetfec virus, Anelloviridae sp. isolate ratane153-zj2, and Anelloviridae sp. isolate AnelloviridaeDogfe362C1, were further characterized in various tissues of plateau voles.

Discussion

The QTP has a unique ecological environment, featuring a large population of small rodents and the frequent activity of stray dogs, domestic dogs, Tibetan foxes, and red foxes3, thereby creating favorable conditions for the transmission of viral diseases. Small mammals, particularly rodents, exhibit regional differences in viral transmission and prevalence. However, some viruses they carry have achieved a global distribution42,43, highlighting their potential role in long-distance viral dissemination. Living in close proximity to humans, rodents serve as key mediators of interactions among humans, arthropod vectors, and wildlife44,45, facilitating the spread of viruses across ecological boundaries. Our study provides a comprehensive virome analysis of plateau pikas and plateau voles, along with their associated environments, significantly expanding the known viral diversity in this region.

Our findings revealed 774 novel eukaryotic viral genomes, the majority of which shared low sequence identity with known viruses, suggesting the presence of previously uncharacterized viral lineages (Fig. 5). The virome composition varied across different tissues, with intestinal samples harboring the highest viral diversity, consistent with previous studies on mammals and humans. Interestingly, although plateau voles exhibited higher overall viral diversity than plateau pikas, the latter harbored a greater number of viral-encoded functional genes. This discrepancy cannot be easily explained, as plateau voles exceed pikas in both habitat diversity and sample size. These findings underscore the need for further research to elucidate the ecological factors shaping viral diversity in these species. Although this study did not identify any known human pathogenic viruses in plateau pikas or plateau voles, the detection of nearly identical viral sequences across various animal samples and between animals and environmental sources, such as arthropods, suggests ongoing viral transmission between these hosts and their surrounding environment (Supplementary Data 3). Moreover, the diversity of viruses carried by arthropods was remarkably high. In this study, the newly identified arthropod-associated viruses were classified into 13 viral families, with some exhibiting substantial evolutionary divergence within their respective families. Notably, host interactions involving Parvoviridae appeared to be more frequent than those of other viral families, whereas Iflaviridae was exclusively found in arthropods (Fig. 5).

This study identified a large number of Picobirnaviridae viruses from plateau voles and pikas, which is consistent with previous studies11, suggesting that the virome of small mammals on the QTP exhibits a distinct composition. This distinctiveness is further reflected in the discovery of novel viruses, particularly the identification of new viral genera. For example, this study proposes two novel monophyletic clades of Anelloviridae. Notably, anelloviruses are not only found in animals but have also been detected colonizing more than 90% of the adult human population46. Therefore, this finding is more positive, as these sequences help fill gaps in known viral families, especially those identified in a wide range of samples, including humans, where they occupy a “narrow” yet distinct phylogenetic niche.

A striking feature of the QTP virome was the dominance of phages, particularly those from Microviridae and Caudoviricetes, which accounted for over 70% of the annotated viral sequences. This suggests that phages play a fundamental role in shaping microbial communities in high-altitude ecosystems. Phylogenetic analysis of Caudoviricetes phages and network clustering analysis of Microviridae viruses revealed substantial genetic divergence from known phage genomes, indicating that the phage communities in plateau small mammals remain largely unexplored. While we used the MGV database in this study, which may introduce a bias toward detecting viral elements with potential relevance to human spillover, the increasing availability of phage genome sequences through databases such as IMG/VR47 is expected to mitigate this limitation and enable a more comprehensive understanding of phage diversity and evolution.

A critical aspect of our study was the identification of 32 mammalian viruses with cross-species transmission potential, including 22 considered at risk of spillover. The detection of canine parvovirus in multiple plateau vole tissues and yak feces suggests potential interspecies transmission, likely facilitated by environmental exposure or direct contact. Similarly, Rodent hepacivirus and Rodent hepatovirus, previously reported in rodents, were detected in plateau voles, raising concerns about their expanded host range and zoonotic potential. Notably, Mosavirus A2 and Chaetfec virus, which had never been reported outside their original discovery locations, were identified in plateau voles, suggesting that viral dispersal across geographic regions may be more common than previously thought. Given that Mosavirus A2 is likely transmitted via bird droppings, its presence in plateau voles supports the possibility of an environmental transmission route that warrants further investigation. Interestingly, although both plateau pikas and plateau voles are dominant species on the QTP, no viruses with cross-species transmission potential have been found to be shared between them. The only exception is Adenovirus myodes38640, which crosses the host orders Rodentia and Lagomorpha, as it has been detected in both plateau pikas and another rodent species, Myodes glareolus. Notably, both plateau pikas and plateau voles exhibit cross-species viral transmission with Phrynocephalus erythrurus, a reptile species also collected from the QTP48, as indicated by the presence of Parvoviridae sp. isolate QTP 1 and Cressdnaviricota sp. isolate QTP 1 (Supplementary Data 4). Therefore, future studies should incorporate a broader range of species to provide a more comprehensive perspective.

In conclusion, this study provides key data for understanding the virome and evolutionary dynamics of small mammals on the QTP, particularly plateau voles and plateau pikas. These findings not only contribute to viral taxonomy but also help evaluate viral spillover risk, thereby mitigating the public health impact of emerging infectious diseases. However, preventive virological research should be continuously expanded to incorporate a broader range of samples for a more comprehensive risk assessment.

Methods

Ethics approval

This study obtained approval from the Ethics Committee of the Qinghai Institute of Endemic Disease Prevention and Control (Approval No. 2024006) and adhered to the Wildlife Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China for sample collection. All sample pre-treatment was conducted in accordance with Biosafety Level 2 laboratory guidelines.

Sample collection, processing, and quality control

In June 2023, a total of 76 plateau voles and 43 plateau pikas, along with 100 environmental samples collected near burrows, were obtained from multiple pastoral settlements across three county-level administrative regions on the QTP. Specifically, 6 plateau voles were collected from Jiuzhi; 28 plateau voles, 13 arthropod samples, and 16 plant and fungal samples were collected from Gande; and 42 plateau voles, 43 plateau pikas, 6 yak fecal samples, 29 arthropod samples, 17 soil samples, and 19 plant and fungal samples were collected from Chengduo (Supplementary Data 1). All samples were stored in sterile containers and transported on dry ice. To better understand the viruses carried by small mammals, we separately collected the liver, lungs, and intestines of each individual plateau pika and plateau vole into distinct 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes, while the heart, spleen, kidney, and brain of the same individual were combined into a single tube. As a result, each individual plateau pika and plateau vole was associated with four sample tubes, resulting in a total of 576 tubes for subsequent library construction.

Before conducting viral metagenomic analysis, samples were homogenized using a cryogenic grinder, suspended in 0.5 mL of Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS), and vigorously vortexed for 5 min, followed by three cycles of freeze-thaw to further release viral particles. Afterward, the samples were kept at 4 °C for 30 min. Following centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 10 min, the supernatants were transferred into 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes and preserved at −80 °C for later use26. For each library, 100 µL of the supernatant was pipetted from an individual sample and transferred to a fresh 1.5 mL tube. These samples were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C and then filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane to enrich viral particles. The resulting filtrates were treated with RNase and DNase, and unprotected nucleic acids were digested at 37 °C for 60 min49. Total nucleic acids were subsequently extracted using the QIAamp MinElute Virus Spin Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. These nucleic acids, containing both DNA and RNA viral sequences, were subjected to reverse transcription with SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) using 100 pmol of a random hexamer primer, followed by a single round of DNA synthesis via Klenow fragment polymerase (New England BioLabs). Libraries were prepared with the Nextera XT DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina), and sequencing was carried out on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform, generating 150 bp paired-end reads with dual barcoding.

During the experiment, all procedures were conducted under strict precautions to prevent sample cross-contamination and nucleic acid degradation. We used aerosol filter tips to minimize the risk of sample cross-contamination. Additionally, all experimental consumables, such as microcentrifuge tubes and tips, that came into direct contact with nucleic acid samples were free of DNase and RNase. The samples were dissolved in DEPC-treated water containing RNase inhibitors. For blank controls, we simultaneously prepared sterile ddH2O and processed it under the same experimental conditions. Sample quality was assessed using agarose gel electrophoresis and the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. During sequencing on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform, the control pool yielded only a minimal number of reads.

Assembly and identification of viral contigs

Primers and low-quality reads were trimmed using Trim Galore v0.6.5 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore), and quality control was performed on the files using the following specific options: ‘–phred33 –length 50 –stringency 3 –paired‘. The paired-end reads were assembled using MEGAHIT v1.2.950 with the default parameters.

We identified the viral origin of the contigs through a series of steps. First, the assembled contigs were screened against a local non-redundant (nr) protein database downloaded in May 2024. Contigs initially annotated as eukaryotic viruses were manually assembled in Geneious Prime v2022.0.1 (https://www.geneious.com) and subsequently inspected, and then used as reference sequences for mapping to the raw data using the default recommended parameters to obtain complete or nearly complete genomes. The obtained genomic sequences were screened for potential vector contamination using VecScreen (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/vecscreen), followed by genomic clustering using MMseqs251 with the parameters: ‘-k 0 -e 0.001 –min-seq-id 0.95 -c 0.9 –cluster-mode 0‘. Subsequently, these sequences were added to the non-redundant viral dataset along with sequences further identified as phage contigs.

Phage contigs were recognized in accordance with the viral sequence identification SOP (10.17504/protocols.io.bwm5pc86). Contigs were validated using VirSorter252 with the option ‘–min-score 0.5‘ and were subsequently analyzed with CheckV53 to remove host sequences flanking prophages. The potential phage contigs were screened based on data from VirSorter2 and CheckV outcomes, which took into account the counts of viral and host genes, VirSorter2 viral scores, and the presence of hallmark genes. These sequences underwent further validation using VIBRANT54 with the option ‘-virome‘, and only those reconfirmed as viral were retained as bona fide phage sequences. These phage contigs were subsequently clustered at 95% average nucleotide identity (ANI) across 85% of the shortest contig following MIUViG standards55, using a custom script from the CheckV repository, to define phage populations.

The complete non-redundant viral dataset (species-level vOTUs) was then compared against the nr database using the BLASTx program implemented in DIAMOND v2.0.1556, and significant sequences with an E-value cutoff of <10−5 were filtered. Taxonomic identification of the viral dataset was performed using TaxonKit57 and the rma2info program within MEGAN658. Phages that could not be classified by comparison with known sequences were further categorized using PhaGCN259, following the latest ICTV 2024 release.

Clustering of viral sequences into vOTUs

To further cluster the species-level vOTU representatives at the genus and family levels, we adopted the scripts developed by Nayfach et al.25, using a combination of gene sharing and AAI. Briefly, the ORFs of the vOTU representatives were predicted using Prodigal v2.6.360 with the option ‘-p meta‘. BLASTp (DIAMOND) was used with the parameters ‘–evalue 1e-5 –max-target-seqs 10000‘ to align all viral proteins. For each genome pair, genes with an e-value < 1 × 10−5 were retained to calculate the proportion of shared genes and their AAI. Genomes were assigned to the same family if they shared at least 10% or 8 genes, with a minimum AAI of 20% (parameters: ‘-min_percent_shared 10, -min_num_shared 8, -min_aai 20‘). Pairs meeting these criteria were retained and clustered using the Markov Cluster Algorithm (MCL) v14-137 with an inflation factor of 1.2. At the genus level, genomes sharing at least 20% or 16 genes, along with a minimum AAI of 40% (parameters: ‘-min_percent_shared 20, -min_num_shared 16, -min_aai 40‘), were clustered with an MCL inflation factor of 2.0.

Annotation of viral genomes

Geneious Prime was used with the parameters: minimum size = 100, start codon = ATG, to predict potential open reading frames (ORFs). These ORFs were subsequently validated through comparison with similar viruses in the GenBank database. The annotations of these ORFs were assigned based on comparisons with the built-in CDD v3.21, a version of the Conserved Domain Database (CDD)61.

Functional annotation and ecological classification of phages

The ORFs of the phage contigs were functionally annotated by comparing them to the eggNOG v5.062 database using eggNOG-mapper v263 with the parameters ‘–translate –itype metagenome‘. eggNOG-mapper v2 is a tool for functional annotation based on precomputed orthology assignments. The KEGG functional annotation was obtained from the eggNOG-mapper analysis results.

The host range and lifestyle of phages were predicted using PhaBOX v264. Phages identified as prophages or those encoding an integrase were classified as lysogenic. The lysogenic rate (%) was calculated based on VIBRANT results, representing the proportion of lysogenic viruses among all detected viruses within each probable host phylum65.

Phylogenetic analysis and sequence similarity network analysis

To elucidate phylogenetic relationships, sequences belonging to different groups of related viruses were downloaded from the GenBank database, along with sequences of proposed species pending ratification. Nucleotide or protein sequences were aligned using MUSCLE, as implemented in MEGA-X66, and the results were trimmed with trimAl67. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using IQ-TREE v2.3.668, with 1,000 bootstrap replicates (-bb 1000) and the ModelFinder function (-m MFP). Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) was used to visualize and edit phylogenetic trees69.

We have also assembled a sub-dataset comprising the protein sequences of the unclassified RdRp obtained in this study, which serves as a hallmark gene for RNA viruses, along with the five RdRp sequences that show the highest sequence identity to these sequences, as well as sequences from other known RNA virus families retrieved from GenBank. We employed MMseqs2 to cluster this sub-dataset and performed sequence similarity network analysis on the non-redundant sub-dataset using EFI-EST70, with an alignment score threshold of 86, corresponding to 35% sequence identity. The obtained network was visualized using Cytoscape v3.1071 for subsequent analysis. Similarly, a sub-dataset of Reps from unclassified CRESS DNA viruses was generated using an alignment score threshold of 37. Likewise, a sub-dataset of MCPs from the family Microviridae was generated using an alignment score threshold of 84.

For viruses assigned to the class Caudoviricetes, we downloaded the HMM profiles of 77 marker genes24 from VOGDB72 and integrated the genus-level vOTUs identified in this study with the human gut virome database (MGV)25 for marker gene analysis using HMMER v3.3.273. Only viruses with >50% completeness, as determined by CheckV, were included in the analysis. Each marker gene was aligned using MAFFT74, and the resulting alignments were trimmed with trimAl to retain positions with less than 50% gaps. The filtered marker alignments were then concatenated, with gaps introduced where necessary to account for missing markers. Finally, only concatenated marker gene sets containing at least three marker genes and present in >5% of all aligned concatemers were retained. We then constructed a concatenated protein phylogenetic tree from the multiple sequence alignment using FastTree v2.1.975, employing the WAG + G model with the additional parameters ‘-mlacc 2 -slownni’.

Statistics and reproducibility

Statistical analyses and normalization were performed using MEGAN6 and R. Alpha- and beta-diversity analyses were performed using the vegan package, applying a statistical significance threshold of P < 0.05. The Shannon index was assessed using the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test. Data visualization was carried out with the ggplot2 and ggpubr packages. PCoA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity was performed using the Permute, lattice, vegan, and ape packages. PERMANOVA was conducted with the adonis() function from the vegan package.

Supplementary information

Supplementary data1 (791.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary data2 (5MB, xlsx)
Supplementary data3 (111.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary data4 (143.5KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by National Key Research and Development Programs of China (Nos. 2023YFD1801301 and 2022YFC2603801) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 82341106) to W.Z.

Author contributions

All authors participated in the design, interpretation of the studies and analysis of the data and review of the manuscript; X.M., C.Z., T.S. and W.Z. contributed to the conception and design; X.L., Q.Z., H.W., L.J., Y.W., J.X., J.L., J.P., X.J., Y.X., S.Y., Q.S., X.W., P.W. and Y.L. contributed to the collection and assembly of data; X.L., Q.Z., H.W. and L.J. contributed to the data analysis and interpretation.

Data availability

The raw sequence data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) at the National Genomics Data Center (NGDC), China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (GSA: CRA015789-CRA015791), and are publicly accessible at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa. The novel sequences reported in this paper have also been deposited in GenBase at NGDC and are freely accessible at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/genbase without any access restrictions. Detailed accession numbers can be found in Supplementary Data 1. Additionally, phages reported in this study have been archived in the Zenodo repository and can be accessed at 10.5281/zenodo.14992764.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Xiang Lu, Qing Zhang, Haisheng Wu, Likai Ji.

Contributor Information

Xiao Ma, Email: maxiao0971@163.com.

Chenglin Zhou, Email: zhouchenglin@njmu.edu.cn.

Tongling Shan, Email: shantongling@shvri.ac.cn.

Wen Zhang, Email: zhangwen@ujs.edu.cn.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41522-025-00814-7.

References

  • 1.Luo, X. L. et al. Emergence of an ancient and pathogenic mammarenavirus. Emerg. Microbes Infect.12, e2192816 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zheng, J. X. et al. Species composition of a small mammal community and prevalence of Echinococcus spp. in the alpine pastoral area of the Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Pathogens13, 10.3390/pathogens13070558 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Wang, X. et al. Investigation on population dynamics and Echinococcus infections in small rodents around human settlement in Yushu City, Qinghai Province]. Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing. Fang. Zhi Za Zhi33, 346–352 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smith, A. T. & Foggin, J. M. The plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) is a keystone species for biodiversity on the Tibetan plateau. Animal Conserv.2, 235–240 (1999).
  • 5.Mills, J. N. & Childs, J. E. Ecologic studies of rodent reservoirs: their relevance for human health. Emerg. Infect. Dis.4, 529–537 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mu, X. et al. Gut microbiome and antibiotic resistance genes in plateau model animal (Ochotona curzoniae) exhibit a relative stability under cold stress. J. Hazard Mater.478, 135472 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang, L. et al. Dysbiosis of gut microbiome aggravated male infertility in captivity of plateau pika. Biomolecules14, 10.3390/biom14040403 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Zhao, J. et al. Livestock grazing is associated with the gut microbiota and antibiotic resistance genes in sympatric plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae). Integr. Zool.19, 646–661 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu, Y. D. et al. Genetic evolution and implications of the mitochondrial genomes of two newly identified Taenia spp. in rodents from Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Front. Microbiol.12, 647119 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yao, Z., Zhao, W., Tang, B., Li, Q. & Wang, Z. Effects of host identity on the gut microbiota: a comparative study on three microtinae species. Anim. Model Exp. Med. 7, 98–105 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhu, W. et al. RNA virus diversity in birds and small mammals from Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China. Front. Microbiol.13, 780651 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Su, S. et al. Characterization of H7N2 avian influenza virus in wild birds and pikas in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau area. Sci. Rep.6, 30974 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yu, Z. et al. Lowly pathogenic avian influenza (H9N2) infection in plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae), Qinghai Lake, China. Vet. Microbiol.173, 132–135 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhou, J. et al. Characterization of the H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus derived from wild pikas in China. J. Virol.83, 8957–8964 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhu, W. et al. Discovery and evolution of a divergent coronavirus in the plateau pika from China that extends the host range of alphacoronaviruses. Front. Microbiol.12, 755599 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xu, L. et al. Five-year longitudinal surveillance reveals the continual circulation of both alpha- and beta-coronaviruses in Plateau and Gansu pikas (Ochotona spp.) at Qinghai Lake, China. Emerg. Microbes Infect.13, 2392693 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang, J. et al. Animal activities of the key herbivore plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau affect grassland microbial networks and ecosystem functions. Front. Microbiol.13, 950811 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smith, A. T., Badingqiuying, Wilson, M. C. & Hogan, B. W. Functional-trait ecology of the plateau pika Ochotona curzoniae in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau ecosystem. Integr. Zool.14, 87–103 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wylie, K. M., Weinstock, G. M. & Storch, G. A. Emerging view of the human virome. Transl. Res.160, 283–290 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hu, J. et al. Characterizing the gut phageome and phage-borne antimicrobial resistance genes in pigs. Microbiome12, 102 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Garmaeva, S. et al. Transmission and dynamics of mother-infant gut viruses during pregnancy and early life. Nat. Commun.15, 1945 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cao, Z. et al. The gut virome: a new microbiome component in health and disease. EBioMedicine81, 104113 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gulyaeva, A. et al. Diversity and ecology of caudoviricetes phages with genome terminal repeats in fecal metagenomes from four Dutch cohorts. Viruses14, 10.3390/v14102305 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Low, S. J., Dzunkova, M., Chaumeil, P. A., Parks, D. H. & Hugenholtz, P. Evaluation of a concatenated protein phylogeny for classification of tailed double-stranded DNA viruses belonging to the order Caudovirales. Nat. Microbiol.4, 1306–1315 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nayfach, S. et al. Metagenomic compendium of 189,680 DNA viruses from the human gut microbiome. Nat. Microbiol.6, 960–970 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang, H. et al. Gut virome of mammals and birds reveals high genetic diversity of the family Microviridae. Virus Evol.5, vez013 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Walters, M. et al. Novel single-stranded DNA virus genomes recovered from chimpanzee feces sampled from the Mambilla Plateau in Nigeria. Genome Announc.5, 10.1128/genomeA.01715-16 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 28.Shkoporov, A. N. et al. The human gut virome is highly diverse, stable, and individual specific. Cell Host Microbe26, 527–541 e525 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kraberger, S., Schmidlin, K., Fontenele, R. S., Walters, M. & Varsani, A. Unravelling the single-stranded DNA virome of the New Zealand Blackfly. Viruses11, 10.3390/v11060532 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Tseng, C. H. et al. Microbial and viral metagenomes of a subtropical freshwater reservoir subject to climatic disturbances. ISME J.7, 2374–2386 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cheng, R. et al. Virus diversity and interactions with hosts in deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Microbiome10, 235 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Deng, Z. et al. Phage-prokaryote coexistence strategy mediates microbial community diversity in the intestine and sediment microhabitats of shrimp culture pond ecosystem. Front. Microbiol.13, 1011342 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mavrich, T. N. & Hatfull, G. F. Bacteriophage evolution differs by host, lifestyle and genome. Nat. Microbiol.2, 17112 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Di Paola, N. et al. Jingchuvirales: a new taxonomical framework for a rapidly expanding order of unusual monjiviricete viruses broadly distributed among arthropod subphyla. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.88, e0195421 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Desingu, P. A. & Nagarajan, K. Genetic diversity and characterization of circular replication (Rep)-encoding single-stranded (CRESS) DNA viruses. Microbiol. Spectr.10, e0105722 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhao, L., Rosario, K., Breitbart, M. & Duffy, S. Eukaryotic circular rep-encoding single-stranded DNA (CRESS DNA) viruses: ubiquitous viruses with small genomes and a diverse host range. Adv. Virus Res.103, 71–133 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang, J. T. et al. Decoding the RNA viromes in shrew lungs along the eastern coast of China. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes10, 68 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen, Y. M. et al. Host traits shape virome composition and virus transmission in wild small mammals. Cell186, 4662–4675.e4612 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu, Q. et al. Association of virome dynamics with mosquito species and environmental factors. Microbiome11, 101 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Reuter, G., Boros, A., Kiss, T., Delwart, E. & Pankovics, P. Complete genome characterization of mosavirus (family Picornaviridae) identified in droppings of a European roller (Coracias garrulus) in Hungary. Arch. Virol.159, 2723–2729 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jiang, X. et al. Virome of high-altitude canine digestive tract and genetic characterization of novel viruses potentially threatening human health. mSphere8, e0034523 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mills, J. N. Regulation of rodent-borne viruses in the natural host: implications for human disease. Arch. Virol. Suppl. 19, 45–57 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 43.Rabiee, M. H., Mahmoudi, A., Siahsarvie, R., Krystufek, B. & Mostafavi, E. Rodent-borne diseases and their public health importance in Iran. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.12, e0006256 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Blanga-Kanfi, S. et al. Rodent phylogeny revised: analysis of six nuclear genes from all major rodent clades. BMC Evol. Biol.9, 71 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Meerburg, B. G., Singleton, G. R. & Kijlstra, A. Rodent-borne diseases and their risks for public health. Crit. Rev. Microbiol35, 221–270 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Taylor, L. J., Keeler, E. L., Bushman, F. D. & Collman, R. G. The enigmatic roles of Anelloviridae and Redondoviridae in humans. Curr. Opin. Virol.55, 101248 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Camargo, A. P. et al. IMG/VR v4: an expanded database of uncultivated virus genomes within a framework of extensive functional, taxonomic, and ecological metadata. Nucleic Acids Res.51, D733–D743 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lu, J. et al. Gut Virome of the world’s highest-elevation lizard species (Phrynocephalus erythrurus and Phrynocephalus theobaldi) reveals versatile commensal viruses. Microbiol. Spectr.10, e0187221 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhang, W. et al. Faecal virome of cats in an animal shelter. J. Gen. Virol.95, 2553–2564 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li, D. et al. MEGAHIT v1.0: A fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods102, 3–11 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mirdita, M., Steinegger, M. & Soding, J. MMseqs2 desktop and local web server app for fast, interactive sequence searches. Bioinformatics35, 2856–2858 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Guo, J. et al. VirSorter2: a multi-classifier, expert-guided approach to detect diverse DNA and RNA viruses. Microbiome9, 37 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nayfach, S. et al. CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes. Nat. Biotechnol.39, 578–585 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kieft, K., Zhou, Z. & Anantharaman, K. VIBRANT: automated recovery, annotation and curation of microbial viruses, and evaluation of viral community function from genomic sequences. Microbiome8, 90 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Roux, S. et al. Minimum information about an uncultivated virus genome (MIUViG). Nat. Biotechnol.37, 29–37 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Buchfink, B., Reuter, K. & Drost, H. G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods18, 366–368 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shen, W. & Ren, H. TaxonKit: a practical and efficient NCBI taxonomy toolkit. J. Genet Genom.48, 844–850 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gautam, A., Felderhoff, H., Bagci, C. & Huson, D. H. Using AnnoTree to get more assignments, faster, in DIAMOND+MEGAN microbiome analysis. mSystems7, e0140821 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Shang, J., Jiang, J. & Sun, Y. Bacteriophage classification for assembled contigs using graph convolutional network. Bioinformatics37, i25–i33 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinforma.11, 119 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang, J. et al. The conserved domain database in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res.51, D384–D388 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res.47, D309–D314 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cantalapiedra, C. P., Hernandez-Plaza, A., Letunic, I., Bork, P. & Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol.38, 5825–5829 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Shang, J., Peng, C., Liao, H., Tang, X. & Sun, Y. PhaBOX: a web server for identifying and characterizing phage contigs in metagenomic data. Bioinform Adv.3, vbad101 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yan, M. et al. Interrogating the viral dark matter of the rumen ecosystem with a global virome database. Nat. Commun.14, 5254 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol.35, 1547–1549 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Capella-Gutierrez, S., Silla-Martinez, J. M. & Gabaldon, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics25, 1972–1973 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Minh, B. Q. et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol.37, 1530–1534 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res.10.1093/nar/gkae268 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 70.Oberg, N., Zallot, R. & Gerlt, J. A. EFI-EST, EFI-GNT, and EFI-CGFP: enzyme function initiative (EFI) web resource for genomic enzymology tools. J. Mol. Biol.435, 168018 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res.13, 2498–2504 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Trgovec-Greif, L. et al. VOGDB-database of virus orthologous groups. Viruses16, 10.3390/v16081191 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 73.Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol.7, e1002195 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kuraku, S., Zmasek, C. M., Nishimura, O. & Katoh, K. aLeaves facilitates on-demand exploration of metazoan gene family trees on MAFFT sequence alignment server with enhanced interactivity. Nucleic Acids Res.41, W22–W28 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One5, e9490 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data1 (791.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary data2 (5MB, xlsx)
Supplementary data3 (111.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary data4 (143.5KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequence data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) at the National Genomics Data Center (NGDC), China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (GSA: CRA015789-CRA015791), and are publicly accessible at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa. The novel sequences reported in this paper have also been deposited in GenBase at NGDC and are freely accessible at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/genbase without any access restrictions. Detailed accession numbers can be found in Supplementary Data 1. Additionally, phages reported in this study have been archived in the Zenodo repository and can be accessed at 10.5281/zenodo.14992764.


Articles from NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES