Abstract
The chromosome number of Hynobiusfucus was found by Lai and Lue (2008) to be 2n = 58, displaying a karyomorph similar to those previously reported in stream-type salamanders from Taiwan. Based not only on cytogenetic features but also on developmental characteristics such as the embryonic stage and the presence of interdigital membranes during limb formation this species can be confidently classified as a lotic stream-type salamander. Morescalchi (1975) proposed that karyotype evolution in families of urodeles tends to proceed from higher to lower chromosome numbers. Our findings from Taiwan suggest karyotype evolution within the genus Hynobius, that is, the chromosome number of this species may have increased from 2n = 56 in the pond-type ancestor to 2n = 58 in this stream-type lineage.
Keywords: 58 stream-type, 56 pond-type, karyotype evolution, mainland China, Taiwanese salamander
Introduction
This study is in memory of the late Dr. June-Shian Lai of National Taiwan Normal University, who provided us with research materials (Iizuka 2016) and was a pioneer in salamander research in Taiwan (Lai and Lue 2008). There have been three reports on the chromosomes of Taiwanese salamanders: Hynobiusarisanensis Maki, 1922 (Seto and Utsunomiya 1987), Hynobiusformosanus Maki, 1922 and Hynobiussonani (Maki, 1922) (Iizuka et al. 1989), and chromosome banding of the above species (Iizuka and Kakegawa 1989). Subsequently, Lai and Lue (2008) described two new species from northern Taiwan, namely H.fucus Lai et Lue, 2008 (Fig. 1A) and Hynobiusglacialis Lai et Lue, 2008, but no reports on the chromosomes of these new species have been published. Here, we report chromosomal information obtained from chromosomal sampling of Hynobiusfucus Lai et Lue, 2008 (Fig. 2A, stored in the database) prepared in July 2009. Fortunately, we obtained embryonic evidence based on laboratory breeding in the winter season, i.e., tail-bud stage embryos of H.fucus that were laid on January 1st, 2025. (Fig. 1B). We also present the karyotypes of the three stream-type Taiwanese species reported to date as well as those of the genus Hynobius inhabiting various parts of East Asia, especially mainland China across from Taiwan, and compare them with the results of this study, including the previous Taiwanese salamanders. In addition, building on the recently reported nuclear DNA analysis results of the five Taiwanese species (Chen et al. 2024), we will discuss the karyotype evolution of conclude H.fucus and the other Taiwanese species and the genus Hynobius five species from mainland China, including developmental physiology.
Figure 1.
AHynobiusfucus photographed by Dr. June-Shian Lai who described a new species from Taiwan mountains in 2008. The hindlimbs have four toes. The morphological changes of H.fucus, male adult during the breeding season shows lentic characteristics such as a flattened tail fin. B Tail-bud stage embryos that were laid on January 1st, 2025. H.fucus is undoubtedly a lotic stream-type salamander. C Final stage of embryos with visible black eyes just prior to hatching. After this, the forelimbs form.
Figure 2.
A Chromosome spreads prepared from intestinal epithelium of H.fucus immature juvenile, unknown sex. Diploid chromosome numbers are 2n = 58. This chromosome number is characteristic of many stream-type species of the genus Hynobius. B Karyotype with Giemsa-stained chromosomes. Chromosome constitutions are as follows, macro: 13 bi-armed 0 uni-armed; micro: 6 bi-armed 10 uni-armed. Scale bars: 10 μm (A, B).
Material and methods
The immature H.fucus specimen used for the observations was collected in July 2009 by Chan Yi-Hao and Nikolay Poyarkov under the supervision of the late Dr. June-Shian Lai from the foot of the Hsueh-Shan Mountains in the Guanwu, Miaoli county in Taiwan at an altitude of about 1,300 meters. The specimen was selected because it had a good somatic metaphase figure when stained with Giemsa. We prepared metaphase chromosomes from gastrointestinal epithelial cells using the method of Kezer and Sessions (1979). The animals were injected with 0.1 ml of 2 mg/ml colchicine solution per 1.0 g body weight and dissected 48 hours later. Cells taken from the digestive epithelium were treated with distilled water, fixed with Carnoy’s solution (1 part acetic acid, 3 parts methanol), and separated with 45% acetic acid solution. Slides were prepared by air-drying and staining with 4% Giemsa solution, then observed and photographed under a microscope. Chromosome division images were photographed with an Olympus Camedia C-2000 digital camera equipped with a 2.11 million pixel CCD (total number of pixels) mounted on an Olympus BH2 (BHS) microscope equipped with a Ryoko-sha attachment lens.
Results
H.fucus is undoubtedly a lotic stream-type salamander, sharing features with rheophilic stream-type salamanders from Japan and Taiwan, like large egg size, nutritious egg yolks, and a cream-colored body, which is unprotected against ultraviolet light due to a lack of melanin (Fig. 1B, C, Kakegawa et al. 1989; Vassilieva et al. 2015). A sufficient number of metaphase cells were obtained (Fig. 2A) and, since an adequate number of chromosome division images were found thanks to Giemsa staining, karyotypes were analyzed (Fig. 2B, Table 1). The karyotype analyzed from juvenile somatic cells of unknown sex consisted of 29 pairs of homologous chromosomes. The chromosome number was 2n = 58, like the other three rheophilic stream-type Taiwanese species (Fig. 2B, Table 2, Seto and Utsunomiya 1987; Iizuka et al. 1989). The 29 pairs of homologous chromosomes consist of 9 pairs of large bi-armed chromosomes, 4 pairs of medium bi-armed chromosomes, 6 pairs of small bi-armed chromosomes, and 10 pairs of small uni-armed chromosomes (Fig. 2B, Iizuka and Kakegawa 1989), resulting in a fundamental number (FN: number of chromosome arms) of 96.
Table 1.
Quantitative characteristics of chromosomes of Hynobiusfucus.
| Chromosome number | Relative length | Arm ratio | Centromere position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.63 | 1.28 | m |
| 2 | 9.30 | 1.37 | m |
| 3 | 8.62 | 1.33 | m |
| 4 | 8.29 | 1.28 | m |
| 5 | 8.00 | 2.13 | sm |
| 6 | 6.90 | 2.17 | sm |
| 7 | 6.19 | 1.84 | m |
| 8 | 6.13 | 2.0 | sm |
| 9 | 5.78 | 2.4 | sm |
| 10 | 4.01 | 2.79 | sm |
| 11 | 3.34 | 2.03 | sm |
| 12 | 2.51 | 2.95 | st |
| 13 | 2.31 | 1.72 | m |
| 14 | 2.27 | 1.94 | sm |
| 15 | 2.28 | 2.15 | sm |
| 16 | 2.01 | 1.51 | m |
| 17 | 1.32 | 1.07 | m |
| 18 | 1.18 | 1.17 | m |
| 19 | 0.85 | 1.43 | m |
| 20 | 1.70 | – | t |
| 21 | 1.21 | – | t |
| 22 | 1.10 | – | t |
| 23 | 0.94 | – | t |
| 24 | 0.79 | – | t |
| 25 | 0.74 | – | t |
| 26 | 0.74 | – | t |
| 27 | 0.71 | – | t |
| 28 | 0.62 | – | t |
| 29 | 0.54 | – | t |
Table 2.
Cytological data in hynobiid salamanders from Taiwan and mainland China. FN: Fundamental number. S: Stream-type P: Pond-type.
| Species | Collecting locality | Chromosome numbers | FN | Breeding habitat | Biarmed macro micro | Uniarmed macro micro | Reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taiwan | Hynobiusfucus | Guanwu, Miaoli | 58 | 96 | S | 13 | 6 | 0 | 10 | Pesent study |
| H.arisanensis | Alishan, Chiayi | 58 | 96 | S | 13 | 6 | 0 | 10 | Seto and Utsunomiya 1987; Iizuka and Kakegawa1989 | |
| H.sonani | Songyuan, Nantou | 58 | 96 | S | 13 | 6 | 0 | 10 | Iizuka et al. 1989; Iizuka and Kakegawa 1989 | |
| H.formosanus | Tsuifeng, Nantou | 58 | 94 | S | 13 | 5 | 0 | 11 | Iizuka et al. 1989; Iizuka and Kakegawa1989 | |
| China | H.bambusicolus | Wuli, Fujian | 56 | 94 | P | 13 | 6 | 0 | 9 | Zeng et al. 1997 |
| H.amjiensis | Anji, Zhejiang | 56 | 92 | P | 13 | 5 | 0 | 10 | Zeng et al. 1997; Ikebe et al. 1998 | |
| H.yiwuensis | Zhenhai, Zhejiang | 56 | 92 | P | 13 | 5 | 0 | 10 | Ikebe et al. 1998 | |
| H.guabangshanensis | Guabangshan, Henan | 56 | 92 | P | 13 | 5 | 0 | 10 | Xiong et al. 2008 | |
| H.maoershanensis | Maoershan, Guangxi | 56 | 92 | P | 13 | 5 | 0 | 10 | Qing et al. 2008 | |
Discussion
H.fucus lives in mountainous areas at altitudes of 1300–2290m (Chen et al. 2024), and the characteristics of its eggs indicate that it is a rheophilic stream-type salamander. As shown in the photo, the morphological characteristics of the developing embryo are typical of stream-type salamanders, but during the breeding season, the tail fin of adult males becomes vertically flattened, typical of pond-type salamanders (Fig. 1A, Vassilieva et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2022). In addition, DNA analysis of the five species of salamanders in Taiwan confirmed that all five species are monophyletic, sharing the same ancestor. In particular, H.fucus is located on the outermost branch of the molecular phylogenetic tree and is estimated to be close to the ancestral type because it lives in lowlands (Fig. 3, Chen et al. 2024). Five species of salamanders with 56 chromosomes live in mainland China, which belongs to the Eurasian continent (including the Korean peninsula) (Seto and Iizuka 1993; Qing et al. 2008). To date, no salamanders with 58 chromosomes have been found in mainland China (Table 2, Zeng et al. 1997; Ikebe et al. 1998; Xiong et al. 2008; Qing et al. 2008). A phylogenetic tree showing the phylogenetic relationship between the four Taiwanese and five Chinese salamanders discussed in Table 2 is shown in Fig. 3 (Wang et al. 2023; Chen et al. 2024).
Figure 3.

A phylogenetic tree showing the phylogenetic relationships of the four Taiwanese and five Chinese salamander species shown in Table 2, created based on the DNA data of Wang et al. (2023) and Chen et al. (2024).
Therefore, the following is thought to have happened: The ancestors of salamanders invaded from mainland China, eventually living in mountainous areas at altitudes of 1,300 to 3,600 m, and then speciated into five species (Iizuka 2009; Iizuka et al. 2016). The chromosomes of H.glacialis, which lives at 3,400 m near the highest peaks, are unknown, but four species, including H.fucus, have a chromosome number of 2n = 58 (present study; Iizuka et al. 2016). H.fucus (2n = 58) shows a karyotype most similar to that of the newly described pond-type Hynobiusbambusicolus Wang et Qiu, 2023 (2n = 56) from Fujian Province, mainland China, except for one pair of small chromosomes (Table 2, Zeng et al. 1997; Ikebe et al. 1998; Xiong et al. 2008; Qing et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2023). What is noteworthy here is the microchromosome. Seto (1994) also noted the number of microchromosomes. H.bambusicolus (2n = 56) has six pairs of bi-armed microchromosomes (=BMC) and nine pairs of uni-armed microchromosomes (=UMC). The H.fucus (2n = 58) used in this study has six pairs of BMC and ten pairs of UMC (Table 2). Thus, speciation is considered to have occurred in the direction of increasing one pair of UMC. A similar phenomenon is considered for the remaining two species found in Taiwan, H.arisanensis and H.sonani. Both species have 10 pairs of UMC (Table 2). Thus, speciation is considered to have occurred in the direction of increasing one pair of UMC from the ancestor of H.bambusicolus (2n = 56) in the three species found in Taiwan (2n = 58) (Table 2). On the other hand, the four pond-type salamanders found in mainland China (2n = 56) have 5 pairs of BMC and 10 pairs of UMC (Table 2). One species found in Taiwan, H.formosanus (2n = 58), has 5 pairs of BMC and 11 pairs of UMC (Table 2). It is also believed that H.formosanus differentiated from the ancestral lineage of the four pond-type species in mainland China by increasing the number of UMC pairs by one. It is believed that, for some reason, the five 58 chromosome salamander species were born from the 56 chromosome salamander species by increasing the number of UMC pairs by one.
Chen et al. (2024) stated that all five Taiwanese salamander species are monophyletic with the same ancestor. On the other hand, karyotype analysis, including this study, has shown that the three Taiwanese species, including H.fucus, evolved from the ancestral lineage of H.bambusicolus in mainland China, and H.formosanus in Taiwan evolved from the ancestral lineage of four species, including Hynobiusamjiensis Gu, 1992 in mainland China. In other words, it is believed that the five Taiwanese species (2n = 58) were born from two pond-types of ancestral lineages (2n = 56). However, if we go back further, the Chinese mainland species may be narrowed down to being monophyletic. It seems to be possible that the evolution of karyotypes in families of urodeles progressed from those with more chromosomes to those with fewer chromosomes (Morescalchi 1975). Moresecalchi does not discuss changes in chromosome numbers within the genus. This study in Taiwan suggests that the 56 and 58 chromosomes evolved from those with fewer chromosomes to those with more chromosomes in the genus Hynobius, that is, from 56 to 58.
Fig. 4 shows the interdigital membrane (IM) of 56 chromosomes Hynobius and the vestigial interdigital membrane (vIM) of 58 chromosomes Hynobius. The Hynobius which lives in ponds and has 56 chromosomes is thought to use its pointed IM to fix its body to the bottom of the pond, allowing it to respond to slight currents and skillfully catch small animals for food (Fig. 4B, Iizuka et al. 2016). On the other hand, the Hynobius which lives in streams and has 58 chromosomes is thought to have lost its need for a pointed IM during the early stages of its larval period because it can grow its body inside the egg sac using the yolk, causing the IM to degenerate (Fig. 4A, Iizuka et al. 2016). In 56-chromosome Hynobius and 58-chromosome Hynobius, IM and vIM disappear as the third toe develops. Since the morphology of IM and vIM of Hynobius from Taiwan and China is very similar to that of IM and vIM of Hynobius from Japan, the figure shows the Japanese specimens. Based on these facts, it can be inferred that Hynobius evolved from 56 chromosomes to 58 chromosomes.
Figure 4.
Stream-type (A) and pond-type (B) salamanders living in Honshu, Japan. A-1 Enlarged view of the forelimb A-2 Tailbud embryo, stream-type salamander Hynobiuskimurae (2n = 58). The arrow indicates the vIM of the forelimb B-1 Enlarged view of the forelimb B-2 Post-hatching larva, pond-type H.tokyoensis (2n = 56). Similarly, the arrow indicates the IM. The area circled in red in B-2 is the IM of the forelimb. The large yellow arrow indicates the direction of evolution.
Furthermore, as a future challenge it seems to be necessary to carry out practical experiments to obtain direct scientific evidence (possibility) for the increase in a single pair of uni-armed microchromosomes. To this end, we recommend conducting molecular hybridization experiments on chromosomes to compare the between the 56 chromosome, pond-type Hynobius species from Fujian Province (across from Taiwan) and the 58 chromosome, stream-type H.fucus using techniques such as chromosome painting and FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) with chromosome-specific probes.
Author contributions
K. Iizuka, H. Koishi, N. Poyarkov, Y. Takeuchi, Y-T. Ju contributed equally to this work.
Acknowledgments
We would like to dedicate this study to the late June-Shian Lai, an expert on mountain salamanders in Taiwan, who provided us with valuable salamanders for this study. We are indebted to our colleagues, i.e., Yi-Hao Chan, Hidehiro Hoshiba, Katsuhiko Ishi-i, Kazuki Ishikawa, Tamotsu Kusano, Tadashi Nakazato, Corwin Scott, Sasha Graffagna, and Stanley K. Sessions. We also thank the anonymous referees for reviewing this work.
Citation
Iizuka K, Koishi H, Poyarkov NA, Takeuchi Y, Ju Y-T (2025) Karyotype of Hynobius fucus Lai et Lue, 2008, a salamander endemic to Taiwan with comments in memory of June-Shian Lai, a pioneer in studies of mountainous salamanders (Urodela, Hynobiidae). Comparative Cytogenetics 19: 155–165. https://doi.org/10.3897/compcytogen.19.158987
References
- Chen HQ, Bu RP, Ning MH, Yang B, Wu ZG, Huang HY. (2022) Sexual Dimorphism in the Chinese Endemic Species HynobiusmaoershanensisUrodela: Hynobiidae). Animals 12: 1712–1722. 10.3390/ani12131712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen JA, Yu PJ, Jheng SW, Lin YZ, Sun PW, Ko WY, Lin CF, Ju YT. (2024) Mining expressed sequence tag (EST) micro satellite markers to assess the genetic differentiation of five Hynobius species endemic to Taiwan. Scientific Reports 14(1): 20898. 10.1038/s41598-024-71887-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iizuka K, Kezer J, Seto T. (1989) Karyotypes of two rare species of hynobiid salamanders from Taiwan, Hynobiussonani (Maki) and Hynobiusformosanus Maki (Urodela). Genetica (Hague) 78: 105–110. 10.1007/BF00058841 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Iizuka K, Kakegawa M. (1989) Comparative karyology in five rare species of hynobiid salamanders from Taiwan and Japan. In: Mastui M, Hikida T, Goris RC (Eds) Current Herpetology in East Asia, 95–105. Kyoto: The Herpetological Society of Japan. 10.1007/BF00058841 [DOI]
- Iizuka K, Sessions SK, Yasugi S, Nakazato T, Takeuchi Y. (2005) Analysis of the form and evolutionary implications of the interdigital membrane of larval hynobiid salamanders. In: Ananjeva N, Tsinenco O (Eds) Herpetologia Petropolitana, 148–154. Saint Petersburg: The Societus European Herpetologica.
- Iizuka K. (2009) Evolutionary significance of vestigial interdigital membrane observed in the developmental stages in hynobiid salamanders. Bulletin of the Biogeographical Society of Japan 64: 169–175. [In Japanese with English abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Iizuka K, Lai JS, Poyarkov NA, Sessions SK. (2016) An integrative analysis of Asiatic salamanders, genus Hynobius using cytogenetics, limb development, and life history. Bulletin of the Herpetological Society of Japan 2016(1): 1–14. [In Japanese with English abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Iizuka K. (2016) Obituaries. June-Shian Lai (1970–2016): specialist on the salamanders of Taiwan. Herpetological Review 47(4): 741. [Google Scholar]
- Ikebe C, Gu HQ, Ruan RW, Kohno S. (1998) Chromosomes of Hynobiuschinensis Günther and Hynobiusamjiensis Gu from China, and comparison with those of 19 other Hynobius species. Zoological Science 15: 981–987. 10.2108/zsj.15.981 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kakegawa M, Iizuka K, Kuzumi S. (1989) Morphology of egg sacs and larvae just after hatching in Hynobiussonani and H.formosanus from Taiwan, with an analysis of skeletal muscle protein compositions. In: Mastui M, Hikida T, Goris RC (Eds) Current Herpetology in East Asia, 147–155. Kyoto: The Herpetological Society of Japan.
- Kezer J, Sessions SK. (1979) Chromosome variation in the plethontid salamander, Aneidesferreus. Chromosoma 71: 65–80. 10.1007/BF00426367 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lai JS, Lue KY. (2008) Two new salamanders from Taiwan (Caudata: Hynobiidae). Herpetologica 64: 63–80. 10.1655/06-065.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Morescalchi A. (1975) Chromosome evolution in the caudate Amphibia. Evolutionary Biology 8: 339–387. [Google Scholar]
- Qing LY, Wang YD, Zeng XM, Chen Q, Hou M. (2008) The karyotype of Hynobiusmaoershanensis (Urodela: Hynobiidae), a new species with rare banding patterns. Herpetological Journal 18: 129–135. [Google Scholar]
- Seto T, Utsunomiya T. (1987) Chromosome analysis of Hynobiusarisanensis Maki, a salamander endemic to Taiwan. Herpetologica 43(1): 117–119. [Google Scholar]
- Seto T, Iizuka K. (1993) Karyotype of Hynobiusleechii from Cheju Island, Korea. Japanese Journal of Herpetology 15: 74–76. 10.5358/hsj1972.15.2_74 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Seto T. (1994) Karyoevolution in Amphibia II. Caudata (Review). The Bulletin of Department of Education in Shimane University (Nature Science) 28: 1–24. [In Japanese with English abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Vassilieva AB, Lai JS, Yang SF, Chang YH, Poyarkov NA. (2015) Development of the bony skeleton in the Taiwan salamander, Hynobiusformosanus Maki, 1922 (Caudata: Hynobiidae): Heterochronies and reductions. Vertebrate Zoology 65(1): 117–130. [Google Scholar]
- Wang ZQ, Othman SN, Qiu ZX, Lu TQ, Prased VK, Dong YR, Lu CH, Borzée A. (2023) An Isolated and Deeply Divergent Hynobius Species from Fujian, China. Animals 13: 1661–1685. 10.3390/ani13101661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiong JL, Qing LY, Zeng XM, Zhao EM. (2008) Karyotype of Hynobiusguabangshanensis (Urodela: Hynobiidae). Sichuan Journal of Zoology 27: 236–238. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng XM, Fei L, Ye CY, Jiang JP. (1997) The karyotypes of 3 species in genus Hynobius and Salamandrellakeyserlingii. Zoological Research 18: 341–345. [In Chinese with English abstract] [Google Scholar]



