Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2025 Jul 29;25(16):6529–6538. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.5c00183

Heteroepitaxial Growth of α‑Ga2O3 by MOCVD on a‑, m‑, r‑, and c‑Planes of Sapphire

Khai D Ngo 1, Indraneel Sanyal 1, Matthew D Smith 1, Martin Kuball 1,*
PMCID: PMC12372763  PMID: 40859946

Abstract

Ga2O3 thin films were deposited simultaneously on (112̅0) a-plane, (101̅0) m-plane, (0001) c-plane, and (011̅2) r-plane sapphire substrates using metal–organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) and characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The different surface energy and strain conditions imposed by each sapphire plane make the choice of substrate orientation critical to the stabilization of the α-phase. β-Ga2O3 nucleation was found to be preferential over α-Ga2O3 on sapphire orientations with <11̅00> α-Al2O3 present (c- and a-planes) when grown under the same conditions. In contrast, α-Ga2O3 is preferred during the initial stages of growth on the r- and m-plane, although suppression of island growth is required to prevent the formation of inclined facets on which β-Ga2O3 might nucleate. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) provided a direct confirmation of this growth for r-plane substrates. Classical nucleation theory was applied to rationalize these observations and guide the search for the growth window of α-Ga2O3. As a result, decreasing the VI/III ratio and increasing the TEGa flow rate were found to be effective in realizing phase-pure α-Ga2O3 on a-plane sapphire by MOCVD with good structural quality (62 arcsec full width half-maxima of X-ray rocking curve), though the equivalent growth on c-plane substrates yielded mixed-phase β- and κ-Ga2O3another metastable phase of Ga2O3, instead. Growth on the m-plane resulted in the smoothest surface morphology and thickest phase-pure α-Ga2O3 film, indicating that it is the most promising substrate orientation for future device manufacturing.


graphic file with name cg5c00183_0011.jpg


graphic file with name cg5c00183_0009.jpg

Introduction

Corundum α-Ga2O3 (space group Rc) boasts the widest bandgap of all Ga2O3 polymorphs (5.1–5.3 eV) and is isostructural with α-Al2O3, commonly known as sapphire. This permits not only the growth of high-quality domain-matched α-Ga2O3 layers on economical substrates (sapphire being available at significantly lower cost than native Ga2O3 substrates used for high-quality β-Ga2O3 growth) but also extensive bandgap engineering by alloying with Al over the full composition range from x = 0 to 1 in α-(Al x Ga1–x )2O3, leading to a bandgap range of 5.1–8.8 eV. Such compositional control is generally more difficult in the monoclinic phase, where β-(Al x Ga1–x )2O3 films typically suffer from local segregation of Al and Ga (e.g., on (001) and (2̅01) β-Ga2O3 substrates) , or phase segregation of β- and γ-Ga2O3 (e.g., on (010) β-Ga2O3 substrates) , toward high Al content. Up to 99% Al composition β-(AlGa)2O3 films have been achieved on (100) β-Ga2O3 substrates, but the film quality degrades with increasing Al content. In contrast, α-(AlGa)2O3 films do not degrade or even improve in crystallinity toward Al-rich regimes. , Finally, it is worth highlighting that, similar to β-Ga2O3, n-type conductivity of α-Ga2O3 films can be achieved by Si, Sn, , or Ge doping, , with controllable carrier density over the range of 1017–1019 cm–3 and electron mobility up to 98.7 cm2 V–1 s–1 having been reported. These qualities make α-Ga2O3 an attractive material for the fabrication of high-breakdown power devices like Schottky diodes, ,, field-effect transistors, , and optoelectronic devices such as solar blind photodetectors.

Despite these advantages, the growth of α-Ga2O3 is challenging because of its metastability. Thin films of phase-pure α-Ga2O3 can transform into the most thermodynamically stable polymorph β-Ga2O3, typically at temperatures above 600–650 °C. Up to now, mist chemical vapor deposition (mist-CVD) ,,, and halide vapor phase epitaxy (HVPE) have proven to be the most effective methods capable of realizing thick layers of α-Ga2O3 on c-plane sapphire; this might be due to the presence of HCl that acts as a catalyst and aids the formation of α-Ga2O3. For epitaxial techniques without HCl such as pulsed laser deposition (PLD), molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), or standard metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD), Schewski et al. found that only a pseudomorphic interlayer of α-Ga2O3 could be stabilized on c-plane sapphire before transitioning to (2̅01) β-Ga2O3 as soon as the film relaxes. Although only a few monolayers of α-Ga2O3 were stabilized, this study demonstrated that substrate-imposed strain conditions are a key factor in the stabilization of α-Ga2O3. A later study by Schowalter et al. showed that the thin pseudomorphic interlayer is actually α-(AlGa)2O3 with ∼65% Al, rather than pure α-Ga2O3 as previously assumed, suggesting that Ga–Al interdiffusion between the film and substrate may occur during its formation. Nonetheless, the influence of epitaxial stress and strain on the Ga2O3 phase selection remains significant and cannot be overlooked. Hence, a-, m-, and r-plane-oriented sapphire were subsequently investigated by other authors as a growth substrate for α-Ga2O3. Nevertheless, due to different growth kinetics across the range of epitaxial techniques reported in the literature, it is not fully clear how sapphire orientation alone affects the assumed phase of Ga2O3. For instance, in MBE growth on m-plane sapphire, it was found that β-Ga2O3 started to grow on a-plane facets of α-(InGa)2O3 film as the thickness exceeded 50 nm. In contrast, a recent MOCVD study reported that growth on m-plane yields mixed-phase α and β at 100 nm thickness, attributed to β-Ga2O3 growing on a-plane facets on the α-Ga2O3 layer. In PLD growth, using the same substrate orientation, phase-pure α-Ga2O3 films are only possible up to 220 nm before β-Ga2O3 started to nucleate on c-plane facets instead.

In this work, to unambiguously determine the influence of sapphire substrate orientation on Ga2O3 epitaxy by MOCVD, which is the industry-preferred growth technique, growth must be performed simultaneously on all orientations in the same reactor. The following four sapphire orientations were studied: (112̅0) a-plane, (101̅0) m-plane, (0001) c-plane, and (011̅2) r-plane. Systematic investigation of Ga2O3 crystallographic structure, material quality, and growth mode for each sapphire substrate orientation provides crucial insight toward achieving high-quality α-Ga2O3 growth by MOCVD.

Experimental Details

Thin films of Ga2O3 were simultaneously grown on (11̅20) a-plane, (101̅0) m-plane, (0001) c-plane, and (011̅2) r-plane sapphire substrates using an Agnitron Agilis 100 MOCVD reactor. All sapphire substrates were diced into 10 × 7.5 mm2 rectangular samples and cleaned using solvents, buffered oxide etch, and a 30 min DI water rinse with ultrasonification before being loaded into the reactor chamber. Triethylgallium (TEGa) and high-purity O2 gas (99.9999%) were used as Ga and O precursors with argon (Ar) carrier gas. TEGa flow rate, VI/III ratio, reactor pressure, and growth temperature were held constant at 19.92 μmol/min, 450, 20 Torr, and 500 °C, unless stated otherwise. The surface morphology of the resulting Ga2O3 layers was characterized using tapping mode atomic force microscopy (AFM), and crystallographic characteristics (crystal structure, quality, and orientation) were studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Layer thicknesses were measured by X-ray refractory (XRR) or optical reflectometry. Reflectometry data were fitted using α- and β-Ga2O3 refractive indices reported by Johnston et al. All XRD and XRR measurements were performed using a Philips X’pert diffractometer with a Cu Kα source.

Results and Discussion

Growth time was varied between 2 and 14 min to produce sets of Ga2O3 films of various thicknesses on the a-, m-, c-, and r-plane. Figure shows XRD 2θ-ω scans of all 16 samples grown. In each growth, the thicknesses of the layers were measured to be approximately 13, 20, 50, and 100 nm for all four substrates, i.e., the average growth rate (∼430 nm/h) was found to be independent of crystal orientation. We denote the 16 films as X1–X4, where X indicates the substrate orientation (A: a-plane, M: m-plane, C: c-plane, and R: r-plane), and the subscript corresponds to the film thickness (1:13 nm, 2:20 nm, 3:50 nm, and 4:100 nm). For example, A3 refers to the film grown on a-plane sapphire with a 50 nm thickness.

1.

1

XRD scans of 13–100 nm thick Ga2O3 films deposited on (a) c-plane sapphire, (b) a-plane sapphire, (c) r-plane sapphire (skew-symmetric geometry with azimuth aligned to [211̅0], tilt ∼25°), and (d) m-plane sapphire substrates, under the same growth conditions of T = 500 °C, TEGa ∼20 μmol/min, VI/III = 450, and p = 20 Torr. The inset of (c) shows XRD scans of the same r-plane samples in symmetric geometry. Note that a few spectra show aluminum peaks at 2θ = 38.2°, 44.5°, and 82.3° arising from the diffractometer stage on which samples were directly placed during the scan.

For growth on the c-plane (0001) sapphire (Figure a), Ga2O3 nucleated as the β-phase and continued to grow into pure β-Ga2O3 films with increasing growth time: only {2̅01} β-Ga2O3 peaks (2θ = 18.9°, 38.3°, and 59.1°) were observed. For growth on a-plane sapphire (11̅20), shown in Figure b, a mixture of α- and β-Ga2O3 was detected, as indicated by the presence of both (112̅0) α-Ga2O3 (2θ = 36.0°) and (2̅01) β-Ga2O3 peaks in Figure b. As the film grows, the intensity of the (2̅01) β-Ga2O3 peak increases at a faster rate than the (112̅0) α-Ga2O3 peakthe latter remaining roughly constant as the film thickness exceeded 50 nm, indicating that growth is predominantly β-Ga2O3 for thicker films.

For layers grown on r-plane (011̅2) sapphire, the (022̅4) α-Ga2O3 peak at 2θ = 50.2° in the symmetric scan (zero tilt) was always present (Figure c inset), but from 50 nm thickness onward, the (2̅01) β-Ga2O3 peak begins to appear in the skew-symmetric scan (25° tilt) aligned to a {112̅3} plane of the sapphire (Figure c). Note that the (112̅3) α-Ga2O3 reflection has a lower relative intensity than the (022̅4) α-Ga2O3 reflection due to the former’s weaker diffracting power. Likewise, (4̅02) β-Ga2O3 is not visible in Figure c because of a weaker diffracting power than that of (2̅01) β-Ga2O3, which already has a low intensity. These XRD observations indicate that the film on the r-plane begins as predominantly α-Ga2O3 and becomes a mixed phase at some point during epitaxial growth, likely due to β-Ga2O3 growing on exposed facets of α-Ga2O3 growth islands. This can occur via (2̅01) β-Ga2O3 nucleating on {112̅3} (n-plane) facets of α-Ga2O3, but not exclusively, as later transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis revealed the presence of additional orientations of the β-Ga2O3 crystallite. So far, we have assumed that no bulk α → β transition took place within the initial few monolayers during growth, which is reasonable considering that the growth temperature was fixed at 500 °Cwell within the stability limit of α-Ga2O3. Such a transformation would also heavily suppress the (011̅2) α-Ga2O3 peaks, which was not observed. In fact, the (022̅4) α-Ga2O3 peak increases in intensity as the film grows thicker. Note that since (2̅01) β-Ga2O3 growing on n-plane facets does not result in a detectable peak in symmetric geometry, caution must be exercised when determining the phase composition of Ga2O3 grown on the r-plane. In addition, as previously discussed, a similar growth mode was also observed in MBE growth where the (2̅01) β-Ga2O3 reflections were found on c-plane facets instead.

Finally, only growth on the m-plane (101̅0) sapphire resulted in phase-pure α-Ga2O3 films. The peak attributed to (303̅0) α-Ga2O3 at 2θ = 64.8° can be seen in Figure d. In terms of α-Ga2O3 crystal quality, the full width at half-maximum (fwhm) of the ω-scan rocking curve was measured to be 0.42° for 50 nm thick layers on the a-plane (at (112̅0)), 0.73° for the m-plane (at (303̅0)), and 1.18° for the r-plane (at (022̅4)).

Investigation of surface morphology (imaged by AFM, Figure ) of Ga2O3 grown on a-, m-, c-, and r-plane sapphire substrates reveals that from 13 nm layer thickness onward, growth proceeds through 3D islands for c-, a-, and r-plane substrates. On average, the growth island size on c- and a-planes (24–26 nm wide at 13 nm thickness) is larger than the island size on m- and r-planes (15–16 nm wide at 13 nm thickness). The increasing size and height of the growth islands manifest as a monotonic increase in surface roughness with film thickness (Figure ). Notably, the morphological evolution of the film on c- and a-planes is quite similar, with almost identical surface roughening rates as a function of deposited thickness and island sizes. This correlates with the dominance of β-Ga2O3 growth on these substrate orientations, especially after 50 nm for the a-plane as shown in the XRD results in Figure . In contrast, for the r-plane, although the growth started with the nucleation of α-Ga2O3 nanoislands, as the film exceeds 50 nm, large islands began to emerge on the surface of the samples grown on r-plane sapphire (Figure k); these subsequently grow into elongated islands running along one direction (Figure l), resulting in a distinct increase in surface roughness. It is speculated that these elongated islands are a result of β-Ga2O3 nucleating on inclined facets of α-Ga2O3 islands as previously discussed, since the emergence of these features coincides with the onset of (2̅01) β-Ga2O3 peaks in the skew-symmetric XRD scan of the r-plane, seen in Figure c. Interestingly, at higher growth temperatures only (650 °C), a similar growth mode can be observed on the m-plane, which will be discussed below.

2.

2

AFM scans (2 × 2 μm2 area) of Ga2O3 films grown on (a–d) a-plane (films A1–A4), (e–h) c-plane (films C1–C4), (i–l) r-plane (films R1–R4), and (m–p) m-plane (films M1–M4) sapphire substrates, with thicknesses between 13 and 100 nm (T gr = 500 °C). Note that film names have the format X i , where X indicates the substrate orientation (A: a-plane, M: m-plane, C: c-plane, and R: r-plane), and the subscript i corresponds to the film thickness (1:13 nm, 2:20 nm, 3:50 nm, and 4:100 nm). The surface roughness of all 16 samples is plotted in Figure .

3.

3

Root-mean-square (RMS) surface roughness of 13–100 nm thick Ga2O3 films grown on a-, m-, c-, and r-planes (T gr = 500 °C).

For growth on m-plane substrates (Figure m–p) at 500 °C, before reaching 20 nm film thickness, it appears that the surface fully coalesces with subnanometer surface roughness. When the epilayer reaches 50 nm thickness, however, new growth hillocks (40–80 nm wide) emerge and are sparsely spaced-out on a very smooth coalesced surface of RMS roughness ∼0.6 nm (Figure o), with RMS roughness comparable to the film at a thickness of 20 nm (Figure n). These islands subsequently expand to 70–130 nm width (Figure p). Hence, it is most likely that the growth mode of α-Ga2O3 on the m-plane is layer + island (Stranski-Krastanov), consistent with observations reported by Li et al. and Jinno and Okumura. Compared to the Ga2O3 films grown at 500 °C discussed so far, Figure shows the XRD scan of m-plane Ga2O3 films grown at a higher growth temperature of 650 °C and their respective AFM scans. As the film grows past 60 nm, XRD 2θ peaks associated with β-Ga2O3 (2θ = 60.9°) begin to appear near the Kβ sapphire peak (Figure a), coinciding with the emergence of elongated islands running along [0001] in AFM scans (Figure c,d). Since similar surface features and XRD peaks have been observed in growth by PLD, they have been attributed to (2̅01) β-Ga2O3 nucleating onto c-plane facets of α-Ga2O3 growth islands, which act as nucleation sites for β-Ga2O3 at higher growth temperatures only.

4.

4

(a) XRD scans of 50–100 nm thick Ga2O3 films grown on m-plane sapphire at 650 °C. AFM scan over a 5 × 5 μm2 area of the (b) 50 nm thick, (c) 60 nm thick, and (d) 100 nm thick film.

The in-plane crystallographic relationships among α-Ga2O3, β-Ga2O3, and the sapphire were confirmed using XRD skew-symmetric ϕ-scans. In Figure a, every α-Ga2O3 peak on the a-, m-, and r-plane is matched to its sapphire equivalent, signifying one single rotational domain. On the other hand, the six peaks over 360° of β-Ga2O3 represent six rotational domains. For growth on c-plane sapphire, this is the well-known epitaxial relationship <010>(2̅01) β-Ga2O3 || <101̅0>(0001) α-Al2O3 as depicted by the model in Figure b, which shows similar hexagonal oxygen arrangement for both (0001) α-Al2O3 and (2̅01) β-Ga2O3. However, unlike the c-plane, atoms on the a-plane of sapphire do not have 3-fold rotation symmetry. Thus, the epitaxial relationship must be slightly different despite the same number of β-Ga2O3 rotational domains. Noting that β-Ga2O3 domains are only approximately 60° apart, and that [11̅01] and [11̅01̅] form a 57.6° angle with [11̅00] on either side such that [11̅00] is the bisecting line, the epitaxial relationship is <010>(2̅01) β-Ga2O3 || [11̅00]/<11̅01>(112̅0) α-Al2O3 (depicted in Figure c). Based on the spacing between neighboring oxygen atoms, the lattice mismatch between β-Ga2O3 and a-plane sapphire is approximately 6.5% for <010> β-Ga2O3 || [11̅00] α-Al2O3 and 12.0% for <010> β-Ga2O3 || <11̅01> α-Al2O3.

5.

5

(a) Skew-symmetric ϕ-scans of Ga2O3 films on a-, m-, c-, and r-plane substrates. Visual model of the oxygen atom arrangement of (2̅01) β-Ga2O3 overlaid on that of (b) c-plane sapphire and (c) a-plane sapphire. Red spheres represent oxygen atoms on sapphire while blue ones represent oxygen atoms on β-Ga2O3 (generated with Visualization for Electronic and Structural Analysis (VESTA) software).

Our observations so far suggest that there are two general cases of Ga2O3 thin film growth on sapphire substrates (Figure ). In case (a), mixed α- and β- or pure β-grains directly nucleate on the substrate on which there are atoms aligned along <11̅00> α-Al2O3 (e.g., c- and a-planes). Eventually, β-grains of Ga2O3 grow over α-grains, and β-Ga2O3 becomes the only phase growing. The proposed growth mode of case (a) substrates is consistent with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations reported by various authors. , In contrast, in case (b), for sapphire planes which do not have atoms aligned along a <11̅00>, such as m-plane and r-plane substrates, a layer of phase-pure α-Ga2O3 is stabilized first. However, if growth proceeds via 3D islands, as the α-Ga2O3 film develops, the β-phase can start nucleating on inclined facets of α-Ga2O3 islands, resulting in significant surface roughening. This occurs after a certain thickness only, since larger grains provide more suitable facets for β-Ga2O3 nucleation. Hence, suppressing island growth and achieving a smooth surface morphology will be crucial to growing phase-pure α-Ga2O3 on case (b) substrate orientations by MOCVD. For m-plane substrates, such a growth mode has been consistently demonstrated across a range of epitaxy methods. However, as previously noted, the specific facet that emerges, which is likely governed by growth kinetics, might vary between different methods.

6.

6

Schematic diagram of the structure evolution of the Ga2O3 epilayer in two cases: (a) In-plane <11̅00> α-Al2O3 is present. β-Ga2O3 can grow directly on the substrate. (b) In-plane <11̅00> α-Al2O3 is not present. α-Ga2O3 grows first, but β-Ga2O3 can nucleate through growth island facets.

To confirm that the structural evolution of Ga2O3 films grown on r-plane substrates is consistent with the proposed growth mode of case (b) substrates, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of sample R3 (T gr = 500 °C, t = 50 nm) are shown in Figure . A sharp film–substrate interface can be clearly observed in both low- and high-magnification images of Figure a,b. The high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) image of the film in Figure b reveals two distinct regions: a lower α-Ga2O3 region with similar lattice spacing (d-spacing) to the substrate and an upper β-Ga2O3 region with larger d-spacing, consistent with the fact that the β-phase has lower density. While the precise α-/β-phase boundary is somewhat indistinct, possibly due to being slightly off edge-on orientation, the β-phase appears to nucleate on top of inclined facets of α-phase crystallites rather than directly on sapphire, appearing as (200) β-Ga2O3 lattice planes (with a d-spacing of approximately 0.6 nm) oriented ∼15° to the (011̅2) α-Ga2O3 planes in Figure b. Note that the dotted white line depicting the boundary in Figure b is an approximation since the phase boundary may not be sharply defined: phase overlap and deviation from the line are possible. Local fast Fourier transforms (FFTs) of the substrate and regions where α- and β-phases exist separately further confirm the identity and relative orientation of the crystals. Both α-Ga2O3 and sapphire show diffraction patterns (DPs) consistent with the [211̅0] zone axis of corundum crystals (Figure d,e). The FFT of the β-Ga2O3 region (Figure c) is consistent with the diffraction pattern (DP) of the [010] zone axis. Notably, the Bragg spots of (200) β-Ga2O3 are misaligned by ∼15° relative to the (011̅2) spots of the corundum crystals, which explains why the β-crystallite observed in Figure b is not visible in standard symmetric 2θ-ω scans. Therefore, TEM analysis of the film grown on the r-plane substrate shows that, in addition to (2̅01) β-Ga2O3 growing on (112̅3) α-Ga2O3 facets found in XRD, β-Ga2O3 can also grow as (200) β-Ga2O3 on inclined α-Ga2O3 facets. Since in the DPs in Figure c,d, {202̅} β-Ga2O3 and {01̅4} α-Ga2O3 Bragg spots are approximately aligned on the same axis, we speculate that the crystallite consisting of (200) β-Ga2O3 planes (in Figure b) arises from the similar d-spacings of {202̅} β-Ga2O3 planes (d-spacing ∼2.8 Å) and {01̅4} α-Ga2O3 planes (d-spacing ∼2.6 Å). Nonetheless, a more detailed TEM investigation will be needed to exhaustively categorize β-phase grains and fully explain their origins on r-plane sapphire. Current TEM and XRD analyses collectively support the proposed structural evolution, wherein β-Ga2O3 nucleates on inclined α-Ga2O3 facets during growth and not directly on the r-plane-oriented substrates (i.e., Figure case (b) substrates).

7.

7

(a) Cross-sectional bright-field (TEM) micrograph of sample R3 (T gr = 500 °C, t = 50 nm). (b) HR-TEM image of a magnified region of sample R3. Dotted white lines indicate the approximate locations of α-Ga2O3/sapphire and α-/β-Ga2O3 interfaces, inferred by contrast and local diffraction pattern. Fast Fourier transforms (FFT) of selected regions in (b) are shown for (c) β-Ga2O3 region (dotted yellow square), corresponding to the [010] zone axis; (d) α-Ga2O3 region (dotted green square), corresponding to the [211̅0] zone axis; and (e) sapphire substrate (dotted red square), corresponding to the [211̅0] zone axis. Reference simulated DPs are provided in Supporting Information.

Overall, under the tested growth conditions thus far, we observed that corundum planes belonging in case (b) tend to favor the growth of α-Ga2O3, stabilizing at least an initial corundum-phase layer. In particular, the m-plane was found to be most conducive to achieving phase-pure α-Ga2O3 films. In contrast, planes belonging in case (a) tend to have undesirable direct nucleation of β-crystallites. Since growth kinetics were the same on each substrate, the variance in the phase composition evolution of the films must arise chiefly from different strain conditions imposed on the epilayer. Indeed, the growth of α-Ga2O3 on lattice-matched sapphire is an example of epitaxy-induced phase transformation, in which in-plain epitaxial strain experienced by very thin epilayers modifies the ground state energy such that typically metastable phases, such as α-Ga2O3, become the most stable. The key difference between the substrates in case (a) and case (b) appears to be the presence (or lack thereof) of atoms aligned along <11̅00> in the in-plane direction. To qualitatively understand why sapphire substrates with <11̅00> in-plane (i.e., case (a)) often favors the growth of β-Ga2O3 over that of α-Ga2O3, let us consider the heterogeneous nucleation of a 3D Ga2O3 island. Adopting a similar argument outlined by Jesser, the Gibbs free energy difference ΔG β–α between a spherical β- and α-nucleates of the same radius R is

ΔGβα=ΔGβΔGα=23πR3ΔGV+2πR2γβα+πR2σm,βα+Es,βα 1

The nucleation of α-Ga2O3 is favored if ΔG β–α > 0. The first term of eq , which accounts for the difference in condensation energy (per unit volume) ΔG V between β- and α-nucleates, is independent of substrate orientation and always negative since β is the most stable phase. The second term accounts for the difference in surface energies γβ‑α. Assuming that the four corundum planes considered in this study compete with common monoclinic planes such as (2̅01) and (100), density functional theory calculations suggested that γβ‑α is most likely negative for all four substrates. The third term accounts for the difference in misfit dislocation energy σ m,β–α. During the very initial stages of growth, this term is negligible because islands can be fully strained. The last term, which accounts for the difference in strain energy E s,β–α, is the only positive term since α-Ga2O3 is lattice-matched to sapphire. Hence, if the magnitude of E s,β–α is greater than that of 23πR3ΔGV+2πR2γβα , α-Ga2O3 growth should be initially favored. Past studies have estimated that, if the nearest-neighbor mismatch between the stable phase (β-Ga2O3) and the substrate (α-Al2O3) is much larger (greater than 10–20%) compared to the mismatch between the metastable phase (α-Ga2O3) and the substrate (ideally as close to zero as possible), then growth islands forming on the substrate prefer to assume the metastable phase. , However, for sapphire orientations in which the in-plane epitaxial relationship <010> β-Ga2O3 || <101̅0> α-Al2O3 is possible, such as c-plane, a-plane, or n-plane, the mismatch between α-Ga2O3 and sapphire is comparable to the mismatch between β-Ga2O3 and sapphire. Based on the arrangement of oxygen atoms, the distance between nearest neighboring atoms along [11̅00] is 3.02 Å for α-Ga2O3 and 2.86 Å for α-Al2O3, resulting in a mismatch of 5.6%. In comparison, the mismatch of <010> β-Ga2O3 || < 11̅00> α-Al2O3 is 6.5%. This is far from the ideal case considered in theory. As such, to minimize free energy, growth islands prefer to assume the β-phase: the energy cost of inducing more in-plane strain in the system is lower than the cost of assuming the α-phase.

Nonetheless, according to eq , it is possible to enhance the nucleation of the metastable α-Ga2O3 over β for case (a) substrates. Solving for R by setting (ΔGβα)R=0 gives a constant critical radius R* above which growth islands will exclusively prefer the stable phase over the metastable phase. This signifies that, to successfully grow metastable polymorphs, the island size must be kept below R*. In MOCVD growth, the island size can be reduced by increasing Ga supersaturation via a combination of higher TEGa flow rate and lower VI/III ratio. This theory was tested for a-plane and c-plane substrates using a TEGa flow rate of ∼23 μmol/min (15% increase from 20 μmol/min), a VI/III ratio of 200 (125% reduction from 450), and a total pressure of 10 Torr (halved from 20 Torr) while maintaining the growth temperature at 500 °C. Note that pressure was reduced here to minimize the probability of homogeneous β-Ga2O3 nucleation from the gas phase, which can occur under high TEGa flow, despite higher chamber pressure increasing supersaturation. The XRD 2θ-ω scan of the resulting 70 nm thick Ga2O3 film on a-plane sapphire (Figure a) shows peaks arising from α-Ga2O3 and the substrate only without any {2̅01} β-Ga2O3 peaks. In terms of crystallinity, ω-scan rocking curves measured at the (112̅0) α-Ga2O3 peak show excellent quality, achieving a fwhm of 62 arcsec, comparable to α-Ga2O3 grown on the c-plane by mist-CVD. , This marked improvement is owed to the film being phase-pure α-Ga2O3, unlike the mixed-phase film obtained using the initial growth conditions. However, phase-pure α-Ga2O3 growth on a c-plane substrate still proves challenging. Under the same conditions for which phase-pure α-Ga2O3 was grown on a-plane sapphire, the film grown on the c-plane is mixed-phase β and κ-Ga2O3 instead. In the XRD 2θ-ω scan in Figure b, a new set of peaks appear to the right of the {2̅01} β-Ga2O3 peaks, which can be attributed to κ-Ga2O3. It is difficult to distinguish the first set of {2̅01} β-Ga2O3 and {002}­κ-Ga2O3 peaks around 2θ = 19°, but the separation is more noticeable toward higher 2θ angles, for example, (6̅03) β-Ga2O3 at 2θ = 59.1° versus (006) κ-Ga2O3 at 2θ = 59.8°. Nonetheless, our results demonstrate that increasing TEGa flow rate and decreasing VI/III ratio (with preferably low chamber pressure) can favor the growth of metastable Ga2O3 (α- or κ-) on substrates with <11̅00> α-Al2O3 present (tested for c- and a-plane substrates), in agreement with nucleation theory of metastable polymorphs. In addition, our observations for growth on c-plane substrates are consistent with a previous growth MOCVD study, in which κ-Ga2O3 was stabilized on c-plane sapphire by lowering VI/III ratios, and similar diffraction patterns were observed. Interestingly, pushing growth conditions into metal-rich regimes (i.e., low VI/III ratio for MOCVD) seems to favor the growth metastable polymorphs of Ga2O3 (α- or κ-) on sapphire substrates with <11̅00> α-Al2O3 for MBE , and PLD as well.

8.

8

XRD scans of Ga2O3 films grown on (a) a-plane sapphire (with the inset showing the ω-scan rocking curve of the (112̅0) α-Ga2O3 peak) and (b) c-plane sapphire under the same growth conditions of T = 500 °C, TEGa∼ 23 μmol/min, VI/III = 200, and p = 10 Torr. A Ge(220) 4-bounce monochromator was used to obtain these scans.

Conclusions

By performing simultaneous growth of Ga2O3 using MOCVD, on a-, m-, c-, and r-plane sapphire substrates, and systematically characterizing the resulting Ga2O3 films by XRD and AFM, we have shown that the structural evolution of the Ga2O3 film depends on the presence of <11̅00> α-Al2O3 in the substrate. For substrate orientations with <11̅00> α-Al2O3, such as c- and a-planes, β-Ga2O3 tends to directly nucleate at the start of growth, making the film either phase-pure β-Ga2O3 or mixed-phase α- and β-Ga2O3. On the other hand, for substrate orientations without <11̅00> α-Al2O3, such as m- and r-planes, α-Ga2O3 tends to nucleate first without any sizable β-Ga2O3 grains present, but 3D island growth needs to be suppressed to prevent the emergence of facets that act as nucleation sites for β-crystallites. Such a growth mode was directly observed for growth on r-plane substrates via TEM. Despite differences in the growth mechanism, the growth rate of the Ga2O3 was found to be mostly independent of the substrate orientation. Finally, classical nucleation theory was adopted to gain insight on the phase selectivity and help identify favorable conditions for α-Ga2O3 epitaxy on sapphire substrates with <11̅00> α-Al2O3. As a result, we have demonstrated phase-pure α-Ga2O3 (with 62 arcsec rocking curve fwhm) can be grown on a-plane substrates by MOCVD under conditions with higher Ga supersaturation, but for c-plane substrates so far, only mixed-phase β- and κ-Ga2O3 films could be obtained. These results serve as a valuable foundation for optimizing scalable α-Ga2O3 growth toward future device fabrication.

Supplementary Material

cg5c00183_si_001.pdf (128.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge partial financial support from the UKRI Innovation and Knowledge Centre (IKC) REWIRE under grant number EP/Z531091/1. M Kuball acknowledges financial support by the Royal Academy of Engineering through the Chair in Emerging Technologies Scheme. We thank Subash Sharma (School of Chemistry, University of Bristol) for acquiring TEM data and David Cherns (School of Physics, University of Bristol) for assistance in its analysis.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.cgd.5c00183.

  • Simulated DPs of the [010] zone of β-Ga2O3 and the [211̅0] zone of corundum crystals (PDF)

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Ul Muazzam U., Muralidharan R., Raghavan S., Nath D. N.. Investigation of Optical functions, sub-bandgap transitions, and Urbach tail in the absorption spectra of Ga2O3 thin films deposited using mist-CVD. Opt. Mater. 2023;145:114373. doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2023.114373. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Shinohara D., Fujita S.. Heteroepitaxy of corundum-structured α-Ga2O3 thin films on α-Al2O3 substrates by ultrasonic mist chemical vapor deposition. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2008;47(9):7311–7313. doi: 10.1143/JJAP.47.7311. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jinno R., Chang C. S., Onuma T., Cho Y., Ho S. T., Rowe D., Cao M. C., Lee K., Protasenko V., Schlom D. G., Muller D. A., Xing H. G., Jena D.. Crystal orientation dictated epitaxy of ultrawide bandgap 5.4 – to 8.6-eV α-(AlGa)2O3 on m-plane sapphire. Sci. Adv. 2021;7(2):128. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd5891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Steele J., Azizie K., Pieczulewski N., Kim Y., Mou S., Asel T. J., Neal A. T., Jena D., Xing H. G., Muller D. A., Onuma T., Schlom D. G.. Epitaxial growth of α-(AlxGa1–x)2O3 by suboxide molecular-beam epitaxy at 1 μm/h. APL Mater. 2024;12:041113. doi: 10.1063/5.0170095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhuiyan A. F. M. A. U., Feng Z., Huang H. L., Meng L., Hwang J., Zhao H.. Metalorganic chemical vapor deposition of α-Ga2O3 and α-(AlxGa1–x)2O3 thin films on m-plane sapphire substrates. APL Mater. 2021;9:101109. doi: 10.1063/5.0065087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Uddin Bhuiyan A. F., Meng L., Huang H. L., Sarker J., Chae C., Mazumder B., Hwang J., Zhao H.. Metalorganic chemical vapor deposition of β-(AlxGa1–x)2O3 thin films on (001) β-Ga2O3 substrates. APL Mater. 2023;11:041112. doi: 10.1063/5.0142746. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhuiyan A. F. M. A. U., Meng L., Huang H., Chae C., Hwang J., Zhao H.. Al incorporation up to 99% in Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition-Grown Monoclinic (AlxGa1–x)2O3 films using Trimethylgallium. Phys. Status Solidi RRL. 2023;17:2300224. doi: 10.1002/pssr.202300224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhuiyan A. F. M. A. U., Feng Z., Johnson J. M., Chen Z., Huang H. L., Hwang J., Zhao H.. MOCVD epitaxy of β-(AlxGa1–x)2O3 thin films on (010) Ga2O3 substrates and N-type doping. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019;115(12):120602. doi: 10.1063/1.5123495. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhuiyan A. F. M. A. U., Feng Z., Johnson J. M., Huang H. L., Sarker J., Zhu M., Karim M. R., Mazumder B., Hwang J., Zhao H.. Phase transformation in MOCVD growth of (AlxGa1–x)2O3 thin films. APL Mater. 2020;8:031104. doi: 10.1063/1.5140345. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dang G. T., Tagashira Y., Yasuoka T., Liu L., Kawaharamura T.. Conductive Si-doped α-(AlxGa1–x)2O3 thin films with the bandgaps up to 6.22 eV. AIP Adv. 2020;10:115019. doi: 10.1063/5.0026095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Oda M., Tokuda R., Kambara H., Tanikawa T., Sasaki T., Hitora T.. Schottky barrier diodes of corundum-structured gallium oxide showing on-resistance of 0.1 mΩ.cm2 grown by MIST EPITAXY®. Appl. Phys. Express. 2016;9(2):021101–021105. doi: 10.7567/apex.9.021101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Okumura H., Fassion A., Mannequin C.. Si-doped (AlGa)2O3 growth on a-, m- and r-plane α-Al2O3 substrates by molecular beam epitaxy. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2024;63:055502. doi: 10.35848/1347-4065/ad3e57. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jeong Y. J., Park J. H., Yeom M. J., Kang I., Yang J. Y., Kim H. Y., Jeon D. W., Yoo G.. Heteroepitaxial α-Ga2O3 MOSFETs with a 2.3 kV breakdown voltage grown by halide vapor-phase epitaxy. Appl. Phys. Express. 2022;15(7):074001–074005. doi: 10.35848/1882-0786/ac7431. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Oh S., Jeong Y., Kang I., Park J., Yeom M., Jeon D., Yoo G.. A 2.8 kV Breakdown Voltage α-Ga2O3 MOSFET with Hybrid Schottky Drain Contact. Micromachines. 2024;15:133. doi: 10.3390/mi15010133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Akaiwa K., Ota K., Sekiyama T., Abe T., Shinohe T., Ichino K.. Electrical Properties of Sn-Doped α-Ga2O3 Films on m-Plane Sapphire Substrates Grown by Mist Chemical Vapor Deposition. Phys. Status Solidi A. 2020;217(3):1–5. doi: 10.1002/pssa.201900632. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vogt S., Petersen C., Kneiß M., Splith D., Schultz T., von Wenckstern H., Koch N., Grundmann M.. Realization of Conductive n-Type Doped α-Ga2O3 on m-Plane Sapphire Grown by a Two-Step Pulsed Laser Deposition Process. Phys. Status Solidi A. 2023;220(3):2–7. doi: 10.1002/pssa.202200721. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wakamatsu T., Isobe Y., Takane H., Kaneko K., Tanaka K.. Ge doping of α-Ga2O3 thin films via mist chemical vapor deposition and their application in Schottky barrier diodes. J. Appl. Phys. 2024;135:155705. doi: 10.1063/5.0207432. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Moloney J., Tesh O., Singh M., Roberts J. W., Jarman J. C., Lee L. C., Huq T. N., Brister J., Karboyan S., Kuball M., Chalker P. R., Oliver R. A., Massabuau F. C. P.. Atomic layer deposited α-Ga2O3 solar-blind photodetectors. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2019;52(47):475101. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab3b76. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee S. D., Ito Y., Kaneko K., Fujita S.. Enhanced thermal stability of alpha gallium oxide films supported by aluminum doping. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2015;54:030301. doi: 10.7567/JJAP.54.030301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jinno R., Kaneko K., Fujita S.. Thermal stability of α-Ga2O3 films grown on c-plane sapphire substrates via mist-CVD. AIP Adv. 2020;10:115013. doi: 10.1063/5.0020464. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. McCandless J. P., Chang C. S., Nomoto K., Casamento J., Protasenko V., Vogt P., Rowe D., Gann K., Ho S. T., Li W., Jinno R., Cho Y., Green A. J., Chabak K. D., Schlom D. G., Thompson M. O., Muller D. A., Xing H. G., Jena D.. Thermal stability of epitaxial α-Ga2O3 and (Al,Ga)­2O3 layers on m-plane sapphire. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021;119:062102. doi: 10.1063/5.0064278. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Oda M., Kaneko K., Fujita S., Hitora T.. Crack-free thick (5 μm) α-Ga2O3 films on sapphire substrates with α-(Al,Ga)2O3 buffer layers. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2016;55:1202B4. doi: 10.7567/JJAP.55.1202B4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jinno R., Uchida T., Kaneko K., Fujita S.. Control of Crystal Structure of Ga2O3 on Sapphire Substrate by Introduction of α-(AlxGa1–x)2O3 Buffer Layer. Phys. Status Solidi B. 2018;255(4):1700326. doi: 10.1002/pssb.201700326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Oshima Y., Villora E. G., Shimamura K.. Halide vapor phase epitaxy of twin-free α-Ga2O3 on sapphire (0001) substrates. Appl. Phys. Express. 2015;8:055501. doi: 10.7567/APEX.8.055501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Son H., Jeon D. W.. Optimization of the growth temperature of α-Ga2O3 epilayers grown by halide vapor phase epitaxy. J. Alloys Compd. 2019;773:631–635. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.230. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Oshima Y., Kawara K., Shinohe T., Hitora T., Kasu M., Fujita S.. Epitaxial lateral overgrowth of α-Ga2O3 by halide vapor phase epitaxy. APL Mater. 2019;7:0222503. doi: 10.1063/1.5051058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sun H., Li K., Castanedo C., Okur S., Tompa G., Salagaj T., Lopatin S., Genovese A., Li X.. HCl-induced phase change of α-β-and ε-Ga2O3 films grown by MOCVD. Cryst. Growth Des. 2018;18:2370–2376. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01791. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schewski R., Wagner G., Baldini M., Gogova D., Galazka Z., Schulz T., Rem-mele T., Markurt T., Von Wenckstern H., Grundmann M., Bierwagen O., Vogt P., Albrecht M.. Epitaxial stabilization of pseudomorphic α-Ga2O3 on sapphire (0001) Appl. Phys. Express. 2015;8:011101. doi: 10.7567/APEX.8.011101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schowalter M., Karg A., Alonso-Orts M., Bich J. A., Raghuvansy S., Williams M. S., Krause F. F., Grieb T., Mahr C., Mehrtens T., Vogt P., Rosenauer A., Eickhoff M.. Composition and strain of the pseudomorphic α -phase intermediate layer at the Ga2O3/Al2O3 interface. APL Mater. 2024;12:091104. doi: 10.1063/5.0226857. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cheng Z., Hanke M., Vogt P., Bierwagen O., Trampert A.. Phase formation and strain relaxation of Ga2O3 on c-plane and a-plane sapphire substrates as studied by synchrotron-based X-ray diffraction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017;111(16):162104. doi: 10.1063/1.4998804. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kracht M., Karg A., Feneberg M., Bläsing J., Schormann J., Goldhahn R., Eickhoff M.. Anisotropic Optical Properties of Metastable (011̅2) α-Ga2O3 Grown by Plasma-Assisted Molecular Beam Epitaxy. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2018;10:024047. doi: 10.1103/physrevapplied.10.024047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Williams M. S., Alonso-Orts M., Schowalter M., Karg A., Raghuvansy S., McCandless J. P., Jena D., Rosenauer A., Eickhoff M., Vogt P.. Growth, catalysis, and faceting of α-Ga2O3 and α-(InxGa1–x)2O3 on m-plane α-Al2O3 by molecular beam epitaxy. APL Mater. 2024;12:011120. doi: 10.1063/5.0180041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li Z., Zhang X., Zhang L., Chen T., Guo G., Zhao D., Hu Y., Zou Z., Zhang H., Xu K., Yang F., Yu G., Mu W., Zeng Z., Zhang B.. Suppression of Screw Dislocation-Induced Hillocks in MOCVD-Grown α-Ga2O3 on m-Plane Sapphire by Introducing a High-Temperature Buffer. Cryst. Growth Des. 2025;25:1406–1414. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.4c01472. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Petersen C., Vogt S., Kneiß M., von Wenckstern H., Grundmann M.. PLD of α-Ga2O3 on m-plane Al2O3: Growth regime, growth process, and structural properties. APL Mater. 2023;11:061122. doi: 10.1063/5.0149797. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Johnston, Z. ; Oshima, Y. ; McAleese, C. ; Massabuau, F. . Comparative study of the optical properties of α- and β-phase Ga2O3 . In Presented at UK Nitrides Consortium Winter Conference, 2021. https://cdn.eventsforce.net/files/ef-q5vmtsq56tk6/website/1773/flash_003.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jinno R., Okumura H.. Strain Relaxation of Al-Rich α-(AlGa)2O3 and α-Al2O3/Ga2O3 Superlattice on m-Plane Sapphire Substrates by Plasma-Assisted Molecular Beam Epitaxy. Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2025:2500136. doi: 10.1002/admi.202500136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nakagomi S., Kokubun Y.. Crystal orientation of β-Ga2O3 thin films formed on c-plane and a-plane sapphire substrate. J. Cryst. Growth. 2012;349(1):12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.04.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yao Y., Okur S., Lyle L., Tompa G., Salagaj T., Sbrockey N., Davis R., Porter L. M., Porter L.. Growth and characterization of α-β-and ε-phases of Ga2O3 using MOCVD and HVPE techniques. Mater. Res. Lett. 2018;6(5):268–275. doi: 10.1080/21663831.2018.1443978. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Froyen S., Wei S., Zunger A.. Epitaxy-induced structural phase transformations. Phys. Rev. B. 1988;38:10124. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.38.10124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Jesser W.. A theory of pseudomorphism in thin films. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1969;4(5):279–286. doi: 10.1016/0025-5416(69)90004-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Bertoni I., Ugolotti A., Scalise E., Bergamaschini R., Miglio L.. Interface energies of Ga2O3 phases with the sapphire substrate and the phase-locked epitaxy of metastable structures explained. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2025;13:1469. doi: 10.1039/D4TC04307C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Chen Y., Xia X., Liang H., Abbas Q., Liu Y., Du G.. Growth Pressure Controlled Nucleation Epitaxy of Pure Phase ε- and β-Ga2O3 Films on Al2O3 via Metal–Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition. Cryst. Growth Des. 2018;18:1147–1154. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01576. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhuo Y., Chen Z., Tu W., Ma X., Pei Y., Wang G.. β-Ga2O3 versus ε-Ga2O3: Control of the crystal phase composition of gallium oxide thin film prepared by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017;420:802–807. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.241. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kracht M., Karg A., Schörmann J., Weinhold M., Zink D., Michel F., Rohnke M., Schowalter M., Gerken B., Rosenauer A., Klar P. J., Janek J., Eickhoff M.. Tin-Assisted Synthesis of ε-Ga2O3 by Molecular Beam Epitaxy. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2017;8:054002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.054002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kneiß M., Hassa A., Splith D., Sturm C., von Wenckstern H., Schultz T., Koch N., Lorenz M., Grundmann M.. Tin-assisted heteroepitaxial PLD-growth of κ-Ga2O3 thin films with high crystalline quality. APL Mater. 2019;7:022516. doi: 10.1063/1.5054378. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

cg5c00183_si_001.pdf (128.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Crystal Growth & Design are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES