Abstract
VEXAS syndrome (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, and somatic) is a recently identified clonal disorder caused by somatic UBA1 mutations in hematopoietic stem cells, leading to bone marrow failure (BMF) and systemic inflammation. We screened 1771 patients with BMF who underwent unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation in Japan between 1995 and 2020 using multitarget real-time PCR. The diagnoses included myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, n = 1139), myeloproliferative neoplasms (n = 125), plasma cell neoplasms (n = 23), acquired BMF (n = 395), and congenital BMF (n = 89). Pathogenic UBA1 mutations were detected in two male patients with MDS (aged 48 and 63 years), corresponding to a prevalence of 0.11% in the overall cohort and 0.18% in MDS cases; an additional 70-year-old male was diagnosed outside of the cohort. All three underwent unrelated bone marrow transplantation following fludarabine and busulfan-based conditioning. The first and third patients died of idiopathic pneumonia syndrome 5 and 28 months after transplantation. In the third patient, UBA1-mutant cells persisted at low frequency in skin graft-versus-host disease tissue despite clearance from his blood. The second patient survived without relapse or graft-versus-host disease at 28 months. Although VEXAS syndrome is rare among unrelated HCT recipients with malignant and non-malignant BMF in the historical cohort, HCT is positioned as a potentially curative, yet high-risk strategy. Additional studies are essential to refine patient selection, optimize transplant timing, and improve management strategies to mitigate risk and enhance survival. Therefore, the role of tissue-residual UBA1-mutant clones in post-transplant complications warrants further investigation.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10238-025-01832-7.
Keywords: VEXAS syndrome, UBA1 mutation, Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, Bone marrow failure, Myelodysplastic syndrome
Introduction
Vacuole, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, and somatic (VEXAS) syndrome is a recently identified monogenic disorder caused by clonal expansion of hematopoietic stem cells with somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene on the X chromosome.1,2
UBA1 encodes the ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1, which initiates the ubiquitination cascade essential for directing misfolded, damaged, and other proteins for proteasomal degradation, thereby regulating protein turnover and maintaining cellular proteostasis.3,4 In VEXAS syndrome, pathogenic UBA1 mutations mainly involve three missense mutations at methionine-41 (p.Met41Leu, p.Met41Val, and p.Met41Thr) that selectively impair the expression of the cytoplasmic isoform UBA1b while preserving the nuclear isoform UBA1a.1,5 The reduction in cytoplasmic ubiquitylation leads to the accumulation of misfolded proteins and disruption of proteostasis, which in turn enhances the intrinsic production of pro-inflammatory cytokines.1,6 The resulting inflammation not only contributes to disease manifestations but also suppresses the normal hematopoietic stem cell function and drives clonal expansion of the UBA1-mutant population.2
Clinically, VEXAS syndrome features bone marrow failure (BMF) with macrocytic anemia, systemic inflammatory symptoms (such as fever, skin rash, chondritis, pneumonia, vasculitis, and thrombosis), and distinctive cytoplasmic vacuolation in myeloid and erythroid precursors. It predominantly affects older men, as UBA1 escapes X-chromosome inactivation.7 A subset of patients with VEXAS present with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or plasma cell neoplasms, typically with low-risk features.8,9 Somatic mutations in non-UBA1 genes can coexist with the canonical UBA1 mutations, but they usually display a spectrum of age-related clonal hematopoiesis rather than direct disease pathology.8–10
The prevalence of pathogenic UBA1 mutations, independent of selection bias for inflammatory symptoms, is approximately 0.02% (1 of 4269) in men and 0.004% (1 of 26,238) in women over 50 years of age.11 The prevalence rate among MDS patients is reported to be higher (0.5–1.3%).10,12 Data on benign BMF without dysplasia or inflammatory symptoms remain unexplored.
Systemic corticosteroids can initially alleviate symptoms in patients with VEXAS syndrome; however, relapse is common after tapering.1 Alternative treatments have been studied with limited experiences. Janus kinase pathway inhibitors13–16 and other cytokine-directed agents16–18 have demonstrated efficacy in controlling the inflammatory manifestations of VEXAS syndrome. However, these immunosuppressive therapies do not reduce the risk of hematologic disease progression or substantially lower the glucocorticoid requirements.19
Treatment strategies commonly used for hematologic malignancies may offer a more promising approach than conventional immunosuppressive approaches for VEXAS syndrome owing to its neoplastic nature. Notably, cytotoxic therapies such as azacitidine13,20–28 and intensive chemotherapy29 have been shown to reduce both the burden of VEXAS clones and inflammatory symptoms, although relapse remains common. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) following cytotoxic conditioning is increasingly recognized as a potentially curative option, but it carries the risk of transplant-related morbidity and mortality.30–36
This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and outcomes of VEXAS syndrome among patients with benign and malignant BMF disorders who underwent unrelated HCT, using historical registry data and archived biological samples.
Subjects and methods
Participants
Patients with MDS, myeloproliferative neoplasms, plasma cell neoplasms, and acquired or congenitally benign BMF who underwent unrelated HCT between 1995 and 2020 in Japan were enrolled. Pre-transplant blood DNA and clinical data were sourced from the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (JDCHCT).37 Informed consent for future genetic analyses was obtained from all participants at the time of their registration in the transplant registry. The present study protocol, including the opt-out option, was publicly disclosed on the JDCHCT website in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was granted by the Human Genome/Gene Analysis Research Ethics Committee of Kanazawa University.
UBA1 mutation detection
A multitarget real-time PCR assay was developed to simultaneously detect three pathogenic UBA1 mutations, p.Met41Leu (c.121A > C), p.Met41Val (c.121A > G), and p.Met41Thr (c.122 T > C), along with the wild-type UBA1. The assay design included a primer pair, three variant-allele-specific locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes labeled with fluorescein, an LNA probe specific to the wild-type UBA1 allele labeled with SUN fluorochrome, and a peptide nucleic acid (PNA) clamping probe complementary to wild-type UBA1. The PNA probe was incorporated to suppress wild-type UBA1 amplification, while enhancing the detection of variant alleles. An analysis was conducted using a QuantStudio Pro 6 real-time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Variant allele fractions (VAFs) were quantified using the QX200 droplet digital PCR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) or the QuantStudio Absolute Q digital PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the same primers and LNA probes employed in the real-time PCR assay. Mutations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing with PNA clamping, as previously described,38 using a distinct primer pair and a PNA probe. Sensitivity was validated by serial dilution of the synthesized mutant controls with genomic DNA from a healthy male donor.
Primers and LNA probes were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA), whereas PNA probes were synthesized by Biologica (Nagoya, Japan). Targeted capture sequencing was performed in one patient to identify any somatic mutations associated with myeloid neoplasms, as previously described.39,40
Results
Participants
Among 4340 patients who underwent their first unrelated HCT in Japan between 1995 and 2020, pre-transplant samples were available for 1771 individuals and analyzed for UBA1 mutations. The median age was 46 years (range, 0–75 years), and 62% of the patients were males. This male predominance reflects the overall demographics of the unrelated HCT registry, as 1586 (62%) of the 2569 patients without UBA1 testing were males, consistent with the known male predominance in MDS.41
The diagnoses included MDS (n = 1139), myeloproliferative neoplasms (n = 125), plasma cell neoplasms (n = 23), acquired BMF (n = 395), and congenital BMF (n = 89). The distributions of the disease type, age, and sex across these diagnoses are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Diagnosis, age, and sex of patients
| Parameter | Overall patients (n = 1771) | MDS (n = 1139) | MPN (n = 125) | Plasma cell neoplasm (n = 23) | Acquired BMF (n = 395) | Congenital BMF (n = 89) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classification, N (%) |
MDS-IB2, 345 (30%) MDS-IB1, 262 (23%) MDS-LB, 407 (36%) MDS-LB-RS, 32 (3%) MDS/MPN, 37 (3%) 5q– syndrome, 5 (0.4%) RAEB-t, 25 (2%) RAEB, 20 (2%) Missing, 6 (0.5%) |
CMML, 81 (65%) JMML, 42 (34%) PMF, 1 (0.8%) aCML, 1 (0.8%) |
MM, 16 (70%) PCL, 5 (22%) Others, 2 (9%) |
IAA, 346 (88%) HAAA, 22 (6%) PRCA, 10 (3%) PNH, 7 (2%) Others, 11 (3%) |
FA, 33 (37%) CN, 20 (22%) DBA, 16 (18%) DC, 7 (8%) AMT, 4 (4%) Others, 9 (10%) |
|
| Age at HCT (IQR), years | 46 (20–75) | 54 (41–62) | 44 (2–61) | 54 (44–57) | 19 (12–34) | 6 (3–10) |
| Range | 0–75 | 1–75 | 0–71 | 31–70 | 1–72 | 0–32 |
| Sex, N (%) | ||||||
| Male | 1096 (62%) | 738 (65%) | 87 (70%) | 15 (65%) | 217 (55%) | 39 (44%) |
|
Female Missing |
674 (38%) 1 (0.06%) |
400 (35%) 1 (0.09%) |
38 (30%) | 8 (35%) | 178 (45%) | 50 (56%) |
| Patients aged > 45 years, N (%) | ||||||
| Male | 604 (34%) | 525 (46%) | 41 (33%) | 11 (48%) | 27 (7%) | 0 (0%) |
| Female | 304 (17%) | 247 (22%) | 20 (16%) | 6 (26%) | 31 (8%) | 0 (0%) |
| Patients aged ≤ 45 years, N (%) | ||||||
| Male | 492 (28%) | 213 (19%) | 46 (37%) | 4 (17%) | 190 (48%) | 39 (44%) |
| Female | 371 (21%) | 153 (14%) | 18 (14%) | 2 (9%) | 147 (37%) | 50 (56%) |
| Missing | 1 (0.06%) | 1 (0.09%) |
aCML atypical chronic myelogenous leukemia, AMT amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia, CMML chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, CN Congenital neutropenia, DBA Diamond-Blackfan anemia, DC dyskeratosis congenita, FA Fanconi anemia, HAAA hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia, IAA idiopathic aplastic anemia, IB increased blasts, LB low blasts, JMML juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, MM multiple myeloma, MPN myeloproliferative neoplasm, PCL plasma cell leukemia, PNH paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, PRCA pure red cell aplasia, RAEB refractory anemia with excess blast, RAEB-t refractory anemia with excess blast in transformation, RS ringed sideroblast
UBA1 mutations
A serial dilution analysis established the detection limits for multi-target real-time PCR as follows: 0.13% for p.Met41Leu (c.121A > C), 0.5% for p.Met41Val (c.121A > G), and 0.5–1.0% for p.Met41Thr (c.122 T > C) (Supplementary Fig. 1).
In the cohort study, pathogenic UBA1 mutations were identified in two of the 1771 patients (0.11%): p.Met41Val (VAF 1.5%) and p.Met41Leu (VAF 6.9%) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
UBA1 mutations in Cases 1 and 2. a, b UBA1 mutations detected by multitarget real-time PCR with PNA clamping. c, d Digital PCR results: variant UBA1 droplets (blue), wild-type UBA1 droplets (green), droplets containing both alleles (orange), and droplets without any UBA1 alleles (gray). e, f Sanger sequencing results with and without PNA clamping. The codon for methionine (ATG) at position 41 is highlighted in gray; arrows indicate the mutation site. panels a, c, and e correspond to case 1; panels b, d, and f to Case 2
These low-frequency mutations were undetectable by conventional Sanger sequencing but were subsequently confirmed using PNA clamping. Both patients were male MDS patients of 48 and 63 years of age (Cases 1 and 2, Table 2). Additionally, we report another case of VEXAS syndrome with a p.Met41Thr mutation in a patient who underwent unrelated BMT at our hospital in 2022, outside the study period (Case 3).
Table 2.
Three cases of VEXAS syndrome
| Characteristic | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| UBA1 mutation (VAF) | p.Met41Val (1.5%) | p.Met41Leu (6.9%) | p.Met41Thr (35%) |
| Age at the diagnosis of MDS | 48 | 63 | 70 |
| Age at HCT | 49 | 66 | 71 |
| Sex | Male | Male | Male |
| Diagnosis | MDS-IB1 | MDS-LB | MDS-LB |
| Cytogenetic abnormality | + 8 | Normal | + 8 [15/20] |
| IPSS | Intermediate-2 | Intermediate-1 | Intermediate-1 |
| Inflammatory symptoms | N/A | N/A | Fever, erythema nodosum |
| HCT-CI score | 4 (arrhythmia, cardiovascular dysfunction, and lung function) | 0 | 2 (cardiovascular dysfunction, cerebrovascular dysfunction, |
| Treatment before HCT | Induction chemotherapy, complete response | Azacitidine, partial response | Corticosteroid, partial response |
| Time from the diagnosis of MDS to HCT | 15 months | 29 months | 8 months |
| HCT type | Unrelated BMT | Unrelated BMT | Unrelated BMT |
| Donor sex | Female | Male | Male |
| ABO disparity | Minor mismatch | Major mismatch | Match |
| HLA disparity (A, B, C, DRB1) | 1/8 mismatch | Match | Match |
| Conditioning | FLU/BU2 | FLU/BU4 | FLU/BU2/TBI |
| GVHD prophylaxis | TAC + MTX | CSA + MTX | TAC + MTX + rATG |
| Engraftment | Day 16 | Day 15 | Day 19 |
| Acute GVHD | Grade I (skin stage 2), spontaneous regression | None | Grade II (skin stage 3), regressed with systemic corticosteroid |
| Chronic GVHD | None | None | None |
| Chimerism after engraftment | Complete donor chimerism | Complete donor chimerism | Donor dominant > 95% |
| Complications | VZV reactivation | None | EBV reactivation, CMV retinitis, PCP |
| Outcome | Died of idiopathic pneumonia syndrome 5 months after BMT | Alive without relapse 28 months after BMT | Died of idiopathic pneumonia syndrome 28 months after BMT |
BU busulfan, CI comorbidity index, CMV cytomegalovirus, CSA cyclosporin, EBV Epstein–Barr virus, FLU fludarabine, IPSS international prognostic scoring system, PCP pneumocystis pneumonia, rATG rabbit antithymocyte globulin, TAC tacrolimus, TBI total body irradiation, VZV varicella zoster virus
Based on the 2 registry cases, the prevalence of pathogenic UBA1 mutations was 0.18% among MDS patients (2 of 1139) and 0.38% among male MDS patients over 45 years of age (2 of 525).
Case 1
A 48-year-old man with MDS (increased blasts-1, trisomy 8) received induction chemotherapy and achieved complete remission. The patient underwent BMT from an unrelated female donor who was mismatched at one of the eight HLA loci. Reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and busulfan was administered because of preexisting arrhythmia and cardiac/pulmonary dysfunction. Engraftment with complete donor chimerism was achieved. Post-transplant complications included stage 2 acute skin GVHD, which was resolved without systemic therapy, and varicella zoster virus reactivation, which was treated effectively with acyclovir. However, the patient died five months after BMT due to idiopathic pneumonia syndrome.
Case 2
A 63-year-old man with MDS (low blasts, normal cytogenetics) achieved a partial hematologic response to azacitidine therapy. Although he developed an invasive fungal infection, he successfully recovered and underwent BMT from an HLA-matched unrelated male donor 29 months after the diagnosis, following myeloablative conditioning with fludarabine and busulfan. Engraftment with complete donor chimerism was also confirmed. The patient remains alive without relapse, GVHD, or major complications at 28 months after BMT.
Case 3
A 70-year-old man was referred to our hospital with a one-year history of recurrent fever, erythema nodosum of the extremities (Fig. 2a), and macrocytic anemia that initially responded to systemic corticosteroid therapy but recurred upon tapering. The patient subsequently became transfusion-dependent for red blood cells and developed progressive thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50 × 109/L). Histological examination of the skin biopsy showed lymphocyte-predominant perivascular inflammation in the superficial dermis (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Fig. 2a–c). Bone marrow evaluation revealed dysplastic changes with significant vacuolations in myeloid and erythroid precursors (Fig. 2c), a blast count of 2.5%, and trisomy 8 in 15 of 20 metaphases, consistent with a diagnosis of MDS with low blasts.
Fig. 2.
Clinical presentations and UBA1 mutation analyses in Case 3. a A picture of the leg at the initial presentation. b A low-magnification image of the hematoxylin and eosin-stained section of the skin biopsy, showing perivascular lymphocytic infiltration in the superficial dermis. c Cytoplasmic vacuolization in bone marrow myeloid progenitors (first and second images) and erythroid progenitors (third and fourth images). d Sanger sequencing of UBA1. e Digital PCR results using whole blood DNA before BMT. f VAFs of the UBA1 p.Met41Thr mutation detected in leukocyte subsets and a skin biopsy specimen at the diagnosis
UBA1 analyses identified a p.Met41Thr mutation with a VAF of 35% in the peripheral blood (Fig. 2d, e). This mutation was predominantly present in myeloid cells (granulocytes and monocytes) but was almost absent in lymphocyte subsets (T cells, B cells, and NK cells; Fig. 2f, Supplementary Fig. 3a–f), consistent with previous reports.1 A further genomic analysis revealed no myeloid neoplasm-related somatic gene mutations. The same UBA1 mutation was also detected in the skin biopsy specimen, with a VAF of 16% (Supplementary Fig. 3g).
Oral prednisolone at 10 mg/day was required to control the fever and skin lesions but had no hematologic effects. The patient remained transfusion-dependent, requiring red blood cell transfusions approximately every one to two weeks. Eight months after the diagnosis, the patient underwent BMT from an HLA-matched unrelated male donor following reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine, busulfan, and total body irradiation, with continued prednisolone administration (Supplementary Fig. 4). No significant early toxicities occurred after HCT, except for a neutropenic fever due to Corynebacterium jeikeium bacteremia on day 14, which resolved prior to neutrophil engraftment on day 19.
On day 48, the patient developed grade II acute GVHD with stage 3 skin involvement (Fig. 3a, b, Supplementary Fig. 2d), which responded well to an increased prednisolone dose (20 mg/day). During the steroid tapering process, the patient developed pneumocystis pneumonia, Epstein–Barr virus reactivation without rituximab therapy, cytomegalovirus reactivation causing retinitis, and recurrent episodes of pneumonia, which were managed with antibacterial therapy. He ultimately died from respiratory failure secondary to idiopathic pneumonia syndrome 28 months after BMT.
Fig. 3.
A UBA1 analysis in the skin acute GVHD lesion from Case 3. a Pictures of acute skin GVHD involving the hand, upper arm, and abdomen. b Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the skin biopsy from the right hand reveals vacuolar degeneration at the dermoepidermal junction, with sparse intraepidermal lymphocytes, scattered necrotic keratinocytes, and perivascular lymphocytic infiltration in the superficial dermis, which are all consistent with a diagnosis of GVHD. c Digital PCR analysis of the skin GVHD biopsy specimen showing persistence of UBA1-mutant cells: variant UBA1 droplets (purple: four dots), wild-type UBA1 droplets (orange), droplets containing both alleles (green, two dots), and droplets without any UBA1 alleles (gray)
A post-transplant digital PCR analysis of his blood obtained on day 20 and in subsequent assessments up to day 271 demonstrated the complete clearance of UBA1 variant clones (Supplementary Fig. 5). In contrast, the skin biopsy specimen from acute GVHD obtained 48 days after BMT suggested a reduced, but persistent presence of UBA1-mutant cells, with a VAF of 2.5% (Fig. 3c).
Discussion
Our study is the first to systematically evaluate the prevalence of pathogenic UBA1 mutations across a broad range of acquired and inherited BMF disorders in a large nationwide unrelated HCT cohort. We identified pathogenic UBA1 mutations in two patients with MDS from the registry cohort as well as a third case diagnosed outside the cohort, all of whom underwent unrelated BMT.
Despite employing a sensitive detection method, the observed prevalence of 0.2% among patients with MDS in our transplant registry was slightly lower than the previously reported rate of 0.5–1.3% but remained significantly higher than that observed in the general population.10–12 The low prevalence of VEXAS syndrome in our cohort likely reflects its typical clinical presentation as low-risk MDS in elderly patients who are generally less likely to receive unrelated HCT. Moreover, prior chemotherapy may selectively eliminate UBA1-mutant clones,20–23,26,27,29 thereby reducing the detectability of mutations. Indeed, the two cases identified after chemotherapy exhibited low VAFs, which were undetectable by Sanger sequencing.
In addition, we demonstrated that VEXAS syndrome is absent in benign BMF. This finding aligns with previous observations that pathogenic UBA1 mutations are associated with distinct clinical features and characteristic bone marrow morphologic changes,1 minimizing the likelihood of misdiagnosis as non-malignant BMF.
Based on our findings, routine screening for UBA1 mutations may be unnecessary in unrelated HCT recipients. However, testing should be performed with a low threshold in patients with relevant clinical features, such as macrocytic anemia, skin rash, or bone marrow vacuolations, as various targeted therapeutic options are emerging. Furthermore, UBA1 mutation screening is simple, rapid, and minimally invasive, as demonstrated in this study.
The skin is the most commonly affected organ in VEXAS syndrome, characterized by leukocytoclastic vasculitis, neutrophilic dermatosis, or perivascular dermatitis,1,42 and is also a primary target of GVHD. We hypothesized that residual UBA1-mutant cells in the skin, such as macrophages, contribute to localized inflammation that mimics or triggers GVHD and other transplant complications. Indeed, we confirmed the persistence of these clones in the skin GVHD tissue specimens. These findings not only suggest that targeted therapies against UBA1-mutant clones, such as Janus kinase pathway inhibitors or hypomethylating agents, could offer clinical benefit in managing post-transplant complications but also raise the possibility that idiopathic pneumonia syndromes, the causes of death in two cases, may be attributed to persistent UBA1-mutant clones in the lung tissue, although autopsies were not performed in these patients.
At the time of clinical decision making for Case 3, no treatment had demonstrated proven efficacy for VEXAS syndrome, except for several case reports of successful HCT. Because the patient had severe anemia and thrombocytopenia and an HLA-matched unrelated donor was available, HCT was selected as the most appropriate treatment option.
Experience with HCT for VEXAS syndrome has largely been limited to small case series,43,44 and prospective trials are currently underway.45 Infection is the primary cause of post-HCT mortality, likely due to immunosuppression resulting from prior corticosteroid therapy and lymphopenia or dysfunctional immune responses associated with VEXAS syndrome itself.46–48 Additionally, the UBA1 p.Met41Val mutation may correlate with severe infections and worse outcomes.5,46 In our study, one deceased patient carried the p.Met41Val mutation and another had undergone prolonged corticosteroid therapy both before and after transplantation, both of whom developed opportunistic infections and subsequently died from idiopathic pneumonia syndromes.
Our multi-target real-time PCR method provides substantial practical advantages over conventional detection techniques. It is simple, cost-effective, highly sensitive, and compatible with the widely available two-color real-time PCR systems. Additionally, the short amplicon length enables the analysis of fragmented DNA from older archival samples such as paraffin-embedded tissues or bone marrow smears, as demonstrated in our skin tissue analysis, which can be challenging for traditional sequencing methods.
Despite its strengths, our method has several limitations. Accurately quantifying VAFs without digital PCR is difficult, and confirmatory analyses using either single-probe PCR or Sanger sequencing are required to identify the mutation type. Furthermore, our assay did not target minor UBA1 variants outside the methionine-41 codon, such as splice site mutations, which account for approximately 4–7% of VEXAS syndrome cases.8,12,13,15,49–53 Future improvements may include multiplexing with multiple fluorochromes and additional targets or incorporating digital PCR from the initial diagnostic stage.
Another limitation is the lack of detailed clinical data on inflammatory symptoms, bone marrow vacuolation, and additional genetic testing beyond UBA1 in Cases 1 and 2, owing to the registry-based nature of the study. Nevertheless, both patients had confirmed diagnoses of MDS, characterized by persistent cytopenia, clearly distinguishing them from clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. The diagnosis of VEXAS syndrome is based on the presence of pathogenic UBA1 mutations, rather than specific clinical manifestations.1
In conclusion, although VEXAS syndrome is rare among unrelated HCT recipients with malignant and non-malignant BMF disorders in the historical cohort, HCT is positioned as a potentially curative, yet high-risk strategy. Additional studies are essential to refine patient selection, optimize transplant timing, and improve management strategies to mitigate risks and enhance survival. The role of tissue-residual UBA1-mutant clones in post-transplant complications therefore warrants further investigation.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The research utilized equipment provided through the MEXT Project for Promoting Public Utilization of Advanced Research Infrastructure (Program for Supporting Construction of Core Facilities), Grant Number JPMXS0440300023.
Author contributions
YZ designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. YZ, TH, YK, MK, YN, SO, and KH performed the genomic analyses. NF, TM, KM, and HI evaluated the skin biopsy specimens. YZ, TI, TH, HMi, HMu, HY, ND, YK, TK, KM, TN, YT, KK, HN, YU, TF, TI, FI, MO, YA, and TM contributed to patient data collection and management. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by Kanazawa University. This study was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Nippon Shinyaku, which had no role in the study design; data collection, analysis, or interpretation; writing of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Data availability statement
Further individual patient data is not publicly available due to ethical restrictions exceeding the scope of the recipient/donor's original consent for research use in the registry. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the Japanese Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests. Y.Z. serves as an Associate Editor of Clinical and Experimental Medicine but was not involved in the review process of this manuscript.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Beck DB, Ferrada MA, Sikora KA, Ombrello AK, Collins JC, Pei W, et al. Somatic mutations in UBA1 and severe adult-onset autoinflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2628–38. 10.1056/NEJMoa2026834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Molteni R, Fiumara M, Campochiaro C, Alfieri R, Pacini G, Licari E, et al. Mechanisms of hematopoietic clonal dominance in VEXAS syndrome. Nat Med. 2025. 10.1038/s41591-025-03623-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hershko A, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:425–79. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pickart CM. Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70:503–33. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ferrada MA, Savic S, Cardona DO, Collins JC, Alessi H, Gutierrez-Rodrigues F, et al. Translation of cytoplasmic UBA1 contributes to VEXAS syndrome pathogenesis. Blood. 2022;140(13):1496–506. 10.1182/blood.2022016985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wu Z, Gao S, Gao Q, Patel BA, Groarke EM, Feng X, et al. Early activation of inflammatory pathways in UBA1-mutated hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in VEXAS. Cell Rep Med. 2023;4(8): 101160. 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Echerbault R, Bourguiba R, Georgin-Lavialle S, Lavigne C, Ravaiau C, Lacombe V. Comparing clinical features between males and females with VEXAS syndrome: data from literature analysis of patient reports. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024;63(10):2694–700. 10.1093/rheumatology/keae123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gutierrez-Rodrigues F, Kusne Y, Fernandez J, Lasho T, Shalhoub R, Ma X, et al. Spectrum of clonal hematopoiesis in VEXAS syndrome. Blood. 2023;142(3):244–59. 10.1182/blood.2022018774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kunimoto H, Miura A, Maeda A, Tsuchida N, Uchiyama Y, Kunishita Y, et al. Clinical and genetic features of Japanese cases of MDS associated with VEXAS syndrome. Int J Hematol. 2023;118(4):494–502. 10.1007/s12185-023-03598-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sirenko M, Bernard E, Creignou M, Domenico D, Farina A, Arango Ossa JE, et al. Molecular and clinical presentation of UBA1-mutated myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2024;144(11):1221–9. 10.1182/blood.2023023723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Beck DB, Bodian DL, Shah V, Mirshahi UL, Kim J, Ding Y, et al. Estimated prevalence and clinical manifestations of UBA1 variants associated with VEXAS syndrome in a clinical population. JAMA. 2023;329(4):318–24. 10.1001/jama.2022.24836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sakuma M, Blombery P, Meggendorfer M, Haferlach C, Lindauer M, Martens UM, et al. Novel causative variants of VEXAS in UBA1 detected through whole genome transcriptome sequencing in a large cohort of hematological malignancies. Leukemia. 2023;37(5):1080–91. 10.1038/s41375-023-01857-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bourbon E, Heiblig M, Gerfaud Valentin M, Barba T, Durel CA, Lega JC, et al. Therapeutic options in VEXAS syndrome: insights from a retrospective series. Blood. 2021;137(26):3682–4. 10.1182/blood.2020010177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Heiblig M, Ferrada MA, Koster MJ, Barba T, Gerfaud-Valentin M, Mékinian A, et al. Ruxolitinib is more effective than other JAK inhibitors to treat VEXAS syndrome: a retrospective multicenter study. Blood. 2022;140(8):927–31. 10.1182/blood.2022016642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Georgin-Lavialle S, Terrier B, Guedon AF, Heiblig M, Comont T, Lazaro E, et al. Further characterization of clinical and laboratory features in VEXAS syndrome: large-scale analysis of a multicentre case series of 116 French patients. Br J Dermatol. 2022;186(3):564–74. 10.1111/bjd.20805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hadjadj J, Nguyen Y, Mouloudj D, Bourguiba R, Heiblig M, Aloui H, et al. Efficacy and safety of targeted therapies in VEXAS syndrome: retrospective study from the FRENVEX. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024;83(10):1358–67. 10.1136/ard-2024-225640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Boyadzhieva Z, Ruffer N, Kötter I, Krusche M. How to treat VEXAS syndrome: a systematic review on effectiveness and safety of current treatment strategies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023;62(11):3518–25. 10.1093/rheumatology/kead240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Al-Hakim A, Trikha R, Phyu Htut EE, Chowdhury O, MacLennan CA, Chee A, et al. Treatment outcomes in patients with VEXAS syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2025;7(7):e472–84. 10.1016/S2665-9913(25)00034-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Turturice BA, Fike A, Patel BA, Groarke EM, Gutierrez-Rodriguez F, Stonick K, et al. Disease trajectories and glucocorticoid exposure in VEXAS syndrome treated with cytokine-directed therapies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2025. 10.1016/j.ard.2025.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Raaijmakers MHGP, Hermans M, Aalbers A, Rijken M, Dalm VASH, van Daele P, et al. Azacytidine treatment for VEXAS syndrome. Hemasphere. 2021;5(12): e661. 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mekinian A, Zhao LP, Chevret S, Desseaux K, Pascal L, Comont T, et al. A phase II prospective trial of azacitidine in steroid-dependent or refractory systemic autoimmune/inflammatory disorders and VEXAS syndrome associated with MDS and CMML. Leukemia. 2022;36(11):2739–42. 10.1038/s41375-022-01698-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Comont T, Heiblig M, Rivière E, Terriou L, Rossignol J, Bouscary D, et al. Azacitidine for patients with vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic syndrome (VEXAS) and myelodysplastic syndrome: data from the French VEXAS registry. Br J Haematol. 2022;196(4):969–74. 10.1111/bjh.17893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kataoka A, Mizumoto C, Kanda J, Iwasaki M, Sakurada M, Oka T, et al. Successful azacitidine therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome associated with VEXAS syndrome. Int J Hematol. 2023;117(6):919–24. 10.1007/s12185-023-03532-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Aalbers AM, van Daele PLA, Dalm VASH, Valk PJM, Raaijmakers MHGP. Long-term genetic and clinical remissions after cessation of azacitidine treatment in patients with VEXAS syndrome. Hemasphere. 2024;8(8): e129. 10.1002/hem3.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sockel K, Götze K, Ganster C, Bill M, Georgi JA, Balaian E, et al. VEXAS syndrome: complete molecular remission after hypomethylating therapy. Ann Hematol. 2024;103(3):993–7. 10.1007/s00277-023-05611-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Trikha R, Kong KL, Galloway J, Basu TN, Quek L, Wilson J, et al. De-escalation of corticosteroids and clonal remission in UBA1 mutation-driven VEXAS syndrome with 5-azacytidine. Haematologica. 2024;109(10):3431–4. 10.3324/haematol.2024.285519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Álamo JR, Torres LM, Castaño-Díez S, Mensa-Vilaró A, Mónica López-Guerra M, Zugasti I, et al. Hypomethylating agents for patients with VEXAS without myelodysplastic syndrome: Clinical outcome and longitudinal follow-up of vacuolization and UBA1 clonal dynamics. Br J Haematol. 2025;206(2):565–75. 10.1111/bjh.19953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jachiet V, Kosmider O, Beydon M, Hadjadj J, Zhao LP, Grobost V, et al. Efficacy and safety of azacitidine for VEXAS syndrome: a large-scale retrospective study from the FRENVEX group. Blood. 2025. 10.1182/blood.2024028133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Heiblig M, Plesa A, Tantot J, Jamilloux Y, Labussière-Wallet H, Sujobert P. Myeloid neoplasm inspired intensive therapy in VEXAS syndrome: a single-centre experience. Br J Haematol. 2025;206(6):1683–8. 10.1111/bjh.20067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Diarra A, Duployez N, Fournier E, Preudhomme C, Coiteux V, Magro L, et al. Successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with VEXAS syndrome: a 2-center experience. Blood Adv. 2022;6(3):998–1003. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Al-Hakim A, Poulter JA, Mahmoud D, Rose AMS, Elcombe S, Lachmann H, et al. Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for VEXAS syndrome: UK experience. Br J Haematol. 2022;199(5):777–81. 10.1111/bjh.18488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mangaonkar AA, Langer KJ, Lasho TL, Finke C, Litzow MR, Hogan WJ, et al. Reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in VEXAS syndrome: data from a prospective series of patients. Am J Hematol. 2023;98(2):E28–31. 10.1002/ajh.26786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Loschi M, Roux C, Sudaka I, Ferrero-Vacher C, Marceau-Renaut A, Duployez N, et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation as a curative therapeutic approach for VEXAS syndrome: a case report. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022;57(2):315–8. 10.1038/s41409-021-01544-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.van Leeuwen-Kerkhoff N, de Witte MA, Heijstek MW, Leavis HL. Case report: Up-front allogeneic stem cell transplantation in a patient with the VEXAS syndrome. Br J Haematol. 2022;199(3):e12–5. 10.1111/bjh.18424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mascaro JM, Rodriguez-Pinto I, Poza G, Mensa-Vilaro A, Fernandez-Martin J, Caminal-Montero L, et al. Spanish cohort of VEXAS syndrome: clinical manifestations, outcome of treatments and novel evidences about. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(12):1594–605. 10.1136/ard-2023-224460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gurnari C, Koster L, Baaij L, Heiblig M, Yakoub-Agha I, Collin M, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for VEXAS syndrome: results of a multicenter study of the EBMT. Blood Adv. 2024;8(6):1444–8. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Atsuta Y, Suzuki R, Yoshimi A, Gondo H, Tanaka J, Hiraoka A, et al. Unification of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation registries in Japan and establishment of the TRUMP system. Int J Hematol. 2007;86(3):269–74. 10.1532/IJH97.06239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tsuchida N, Kunishita Y, Uchiyama Y, Kirino Y, Enaka M, Yamaguchi Y, et al. Pathogenic UBA1 variants associated with VEXAS syndrome in Japanese patients with relapsing polychondritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(8):1057–61. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yoshizato T, Nannya Y, Atsuta Y, Shiozawa Y, Iijima-Yamashita Y, Yoshida K, et al. Genetic abnormalities in myelodysplasia and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: impact on outcome of stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2017;129(17):2347–58. 10.1182/blood-2016-12-754796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nannya Y, Tobiasson M, Sato S, Bernard E, Ohtake S, Takeda J, et al. Postazacitidine clone size predicts long-term outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and related myeloid neoplasms. Blood Adv. 2023;7(14):3624–36. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.SEER*Explorer: An interactive website for SEER cancer statistics [Internet]. Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute; 2025 Apr 16. [cited 2025 Jun 14]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics-network/explorer/. Data source(s): SEER Incidence Data, November 2024 Submission (1975–2022), SEER 21 registries. In.
- 42.Tan IJ, Ferrada MA, Ahmad S, Fike A, Quinn KA, Groarke EM, et al. Skin manifestations of VEXAS syndrome and associated genotypes. JAMA Dermatol. 2024;160(8):822–9. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mohty R, Reljic T, Abdel-Razeq N, Jamy O, Badar T, Kumar A, et al. Assessing the efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in VEXAS syndrome: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024;59(10):1423–7. 10.1038/s41409-024-02375-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ali SB, Gurnari C. Allogenic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in VEXAS: a review of 33 patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2024;43(11):3565–75. 10.1007/s10067-024-07160-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dias AL, Groarke EM, Hickstein D, Patel B. Role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in VEXAS syndrome. Ann Hematol. 2024;103(11):4427–36. 10.1007/s00277-024-05942-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.de Valence B, Delaune M, Nguyen Y, Jachiet V, Heiblig M, Jean A, et al. Serious infections in patients with VEXAS syndrome: data from the French VEXAS registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024;83(3):372–81. 10.1136/ard-2023-224819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mizumaki H, Gao S, Wu Z, Gutierrez-Rodrigues F, Bissa M, Feng X, et al. In depth transcriptomic profiling defines a landscape of dysfunctional immune responses in patients with VEXAS syndrome. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):4690. 10.1038/s41467-025-59890-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Czech M, Cuellar-Rodriguez J, Patel BA, Groarke EM, Cowen EW, Turturice B, et al. Opportunistic infections, mortality risk, and prevention strategies in patients with vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024;11(7): ofae405. 10.1093/ofid/ofae405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Templé M, Duroyon E, Croizier C, Rossignol J, Huet T, Friedrich C, et al. Atypical splice-site mutations causing VEXAS syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(12):e435–7. 10.1093/rheumatology/keab524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Poulter JA, Collins JC, Cargo C, De Tute RM, Evans P, Ospina Cardona D, et al. Novel somatic mutations in UBA1 as a cause of VEXAS syndrome. Blood. 2021;137(26):3676–81. 10.1182/blood.2020010286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Oganesyan A, Jachiet V, Chasset F, Hirsch P, Hage-Sleiman M, Fabiani B, et al. VEXAS syndrome: still expanding the clinical phenotype. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(9):e321–3. 10.1093/rheumatology/keab225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Stiburkova B, Pavelcova K, Belickova M, Magaziner SJ, Collins JC, Werner A, et al. Novel somatic UBA1 variant in a patient with VEXAS syndrome. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023;75(7):1285–90. 10.1002/art.42471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Faurel A, Heiblig M, Kosmider O, Cornillon J, Boudou L, Guyotat D, et al. Recurrent mutations of the active adenylation domain of UBA1 in atypical form of VEXAS syndrome. Hemasphere. 2023;7(4): e868. 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Further individual patient data is not publicly available due to ethical restrictions exceeding the scope of the recipient/donor's original consent for research use in the registry. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the Japanese Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.



