Dear Editor,
We read with enthusiasm the latest article by Mroz et al., 1 entitled “What Do Physicians Want at the end? An international qualitative study on physicians’ personal end-of-life preferences and what influences them.” This timely study makes an essential contribution by examining how personal experiences, cultural contexts, and legislative frameworks influence physicians’ end-of-life (EOL) preferences. The cross-national qualitative approach and the reflective methodology employed by the authors provide much-needed deep insights into the complex decision-making processes of physicians in Belgium, Italy, and the United States.
The study convincingly demonstrates that many doctors, particularly those working in palliative care, generally prefer nonaggressive interventions at the EOL. They place greater value on comfort, dignity, and the meaningful presence of loved ones in the final days of life.1,2 Interestingly, the article also highlights how doctors’ personal and professional experiences in dealing with challenging clinical cases and losing loved ones significantly shape their EOL preferences. Additionally, these findings underscore the importance of social, cultural, religious, and legislative contexts in determining doctors’ preferences, and how they provide care to patients. 3
Although its contribution is significant, the article’s conclusion leans toward a universal tendency in EOL values such as dignity and comfort while acknowledging notable variations in attitudes toward issues like assisted dying based on cultural, legal, and religious factors. The tension between universal values and cultural or legislative environmental specifics remains significant. In many regions of Asia, Africa, or the Middle East, religious beliefs and family obligations are often prioritized over individual autonomy, leading to very different understandings of the meaning of a “good death.” 4 Expanding the scope of future research to more diverse cultural environments is crucial to avoid overly Western-centric interpretations of EOL ideals. 5
Additionally, while the authors accurately describe how clinical experience influences doctors’ personal preferences, exploring how doctors navigate potential conflicts between their personal EOL preferences and professional obligations when guiding patients is essential. 6 More in-depth qualitative research on how doctors navigate the boundaries between individual values and clinical recommendations, particularly in complex ethical situations, will provide crucial insights for medical policy and education. 7
In conclusion, Mroz et al.’s work has advanced our understanding of how doctors reflect on their mortality and EOL care preferences. I encourage further exploration of the influence of underrepresented cultural, spiritual, and legal contexts on the perspectives of both healthcare providers and patients. Ultimately, fostering open dialogue and ongoing reflection within the medical community will be crucial for developing truly patient-centered and globally relevant palliative care services.
Isnaria Rizki Hayati, M.Pd
Department of Guidance and Counselling, Universitas
Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Dr. Rikas Saputra, S.Pd., M.Pd
Dr. Neni Noviza, M.Pd
Department of Islamic Guidance and Counselling,
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang,
Indonesia
Yenni Lidyawati, S.Pd., M.Pd
Department of Indonesian Language and Literature
Education, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
Rizky Andana Pohan, M.Pd
Department of Islamic Guidance and Counseling,
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa,
Kota Langsa, Indonesia
Footnotes
ORCID iD: Rikas Saputra 
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1926-667X
Author contributions: Isnaria Rizki Hayati: Conceptualization; Resources; Writing – review & editing.
Rikas Saputra: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Resources.
Neni Noviza: Resources; Supervision; Validation.
Yenni Lidyawati: Conceptualization; Resources; Visualization; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing.
Rizky Andana Pohan: Conceptualization; Investigation; Resources; Supervision; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing.
Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Data availability statement: Not applicable.
References
- 1. Mroz S, Daenen F, Dierickx S, et al. (2025). What do physicians want at the end ? An international qualitative study on physicians’ personal end-of-life preferences and what influences them. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2025; 19: 26323524251351349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Saputra R, Setyorini, Rasmanah M, et al. Spiritual embrace: a source of strength for caregivers in a mental health crisis. Palliat Support Care 2024; 22: 1–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Cain CL, Surbone A, Elk R, et al. Culture and palliative care: preferences, communication, meaning, and mutual decision making. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018; 55(5): 1408–1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Choudry M, Latif A, Warburton KG. (2018). An overview of the spiritual importances of end-of-life care among the five major faiths of the United Kingdom. Clin Med 2018; 18(1): 23–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Marianti L, Saputra R, Arizona, et al. Increasing the scope of virtual reality in palliative care: insights and future directions. Palliat Support Care 2024; 22(5): 1548–1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Alanazi MA, Shaban MM, Ramadan OME, et al. Navigating end-of-life decision-making in nursing: a systematic review of ethical challenges and palliative care practices. BMC Nurs 2024; 23(1): 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Pohan RA, Astuti RD, Maizura N, et al. Meaning in life as a pathway to longevity and better health outcomes. J Psychosom Res 2025; 189: 112035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]