Abstract
Background:
Emerging evidence highlights the therapeutic potential of microRNAs (miRNAs) in cancer, positioning them as key molecular tools in personalized medicine. In this study, we aim to identify miRNAs as novel indicators of poor prognosis in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) patients and to explore their potential therapeutic options for TNBC.
Materials and Methods:
Potent tumor suppressor miRNAs were obtained from four available datasets (GSE38167, GSE40049, GSE86278, GSE154255) of the Gene Expression Omnibus database comprising a total of 94 TNBC-positive and 40 normal tissue samples were analyzed using DESeq2 software. Further, TargetScan was used to predict the targets of differentially downregulated miRNAs and the functional and pathway enrichment analyses were performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) bioinformatics tool. The data obtained were validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Finally, survival analysis was performed in the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) cohort to check the impact of these miRNAs in TNBC patients. Results: Differential expression analysis revealed that 110 miRNAs were upregulated and 243 miRNAs were downregulated in TNBC samples compared to the normal breast tissue samples. The top five downregulated miRNAs were miR-204, miR-6068, miR-139, miR-26a and miR-215. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology analysis showed that these miRNAs are involved in various hallmarks of cancer. Further validation using qRT-PCR analysis showed that miR-204, miR-139, and miR-26a were significantly downregulated in TNBC cell lines, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 and HCC1937 compared to non-tumorigenic cell line, MCF 10A. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the survival rate of patients with low miR-204 expression was significantly lower compared to the miR-204 upregulated group.
Conclusion:
miR-204 can be a potential therapeutic molecule in TNBC. Strategies aimed at restoring the expression of miR-204 through miRNA replacement therapies could offer novel therapeutic approaches for TNBC patients.
Key Words: TNBC, miRNA, tumor suppressor
Introduction
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs of 22-25 nucleotide length that modulate gene expression by binding to 3’ untranslated regions (UTR) of messenger RNA (mRNA), leading to mRNA degradation or translational repression [1]. In recent years, miRNAs have emerged as crucial regulators of gene expression [2]. They serve as master regulators of several biological processes, including cell growth, cell cycle, differentiation, development, immune response and apoptosis [3]. Over the last several years, increasing evidence has shown the expression of several miRNAs that are dysregulated in human cancers through various mechanisms, including miRNA gene amplification or deletion, dysregulated transcriptional machinery and epigenetic changes [4]. The dysregulated miRNAs act as oncogenes or tumor suppressors and are implicated in various aspects of cancer biology, including tumorigenesis, progression, apoptosis, metastasis and angiogenesis [5].
Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer lacking the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Despite advancements in cancer treatment, TNBC patients often confront poor prognosis and have limited therapeutic options compared to other breast cancer subtypes [6]. Identifying miRNAs could pave the way for developing miRNA-based targeted therapies for TNBC patients. Studies over the last several years have highlighted the potential of miRNAs as therapeutic molecules for various cancers, including TNBC [7]. Several studies have reported downregulation of tumor suppressor miRNAs, such as miR-206, miR-203, miR-770, miR-148a, and miR-200 in TNBC, suggesting their involvement in the development and progression of this aggressive breast cancer subtype [8-12].
The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) is a publicly accessible database curated by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), serving as a valuable tool for scientists investigating the underlying mechanisms of several disease conditions. In the current study, we utilized bioinformatics tools to analyze gene expression profiling data from the GEO database to identify differentially expressed miRNAs in TNBC compared to normal tissues. Subsequently, we used Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and Kaplan-Meier analysis of the top five downregulated miRNAs to identify tumor suppressor miRNAs with therapeutic potential. By integrating these analyses, our study aims to identify key tumor suppressor miRNAs downregulated in TNBC and analyze their therapeutic potential.
Materials and Methods
miRNA-Seq Datasets
The miRNA datasets GSE38167, GSE40049, GSE86278, and GSE154255 were obtained from the GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). The consolidated dataset with 94 TNBC and 40 normal samples was selected for the study.
miRNA Expression Analysis
Differential miRNA expression analysis of miRNA-seq data was conducted using DESeq2 software. The differentially expressed miRNAs in TNBC compared to the normal tissues were identified. A volcano plot with log2 fold change (log2FC) and −log10 (p-value) of each miRNA was created to represent the findings visually. miRNAs with p-value < 0.05, log2FC ≥ 1 (upregulated) and log2FC ≤ −1 (downregulated) were considered statistically significant.
Functional Enrichment Analysis
The targets of the identified miRNAs were predicted using TargetScan. Further, the GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses of the miRNA target genes were performed using the bioinformatics tool Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/tools.jsp). The GO analysis included biological processes, cellular components, and molecular function categories. GO terms and pathways with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Cell Culture
The non-tumorigenic mammary epithelial cell line, MCF 10A and TNBC cell lines, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, and HCC1937 used for the study were collected from the RGCB Central Cell Repository facility. The cells were validated by STR analysis and were cultured at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. MCF 10A cells were grown in Mammary Epithelial Cell Growth Basal Medium (MEBM®, Lonza) supplemented with SingleQuots® (MEGM® BulletKit®, Lonza). MDA-MB-231 were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), high glucose supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% Penicillin (5000 Units/mL)-streptomycin (5000 μg/mL). MDA-MB-468 and HCC1937 were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI), supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% Penicillin (5000 Units/mL) - streptomycin (5,000 μg/mL).
RNA Extraction and qRT- PCR Validation
Each cell line was cultured in triplicates for RNA extraction using the Trizol method as per the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen, USA). The quantification assessment of the extracted RNA was performed using the NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer. The extracted RNA underwent reverse transcription following the Mir-X™ miRNA First-Strand Synthesis Kit (Takara Bio). qRT-PCR was performed using iTaq™ Universal SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories) in technical triplicates. The primers are shown in Table 1. The miRNA expression levels were normalized to U6, the normalized expression of the technical triplicates was then averaged, and the fold change was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method.
Table 1.
List of Primers
| Sl.No | Primer | Sequence (5’ to 3’) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | miR-204 | CCTTTGTCATCCTATGCC |
| 2 | miR-6068 | CTGCGAGTCTCCGGCGGT |
| 3 | miR-139 | ACAGTGCACGTGTCTCC |
| 4 | miR-26a | TCAAGTAATCCAGGATAGGC |
| 5 | miR-215 | TGACCTATGAATTGACAGA |
Survival Analysis
Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier plotter online tool (http://kmplot.com/analysis/). Systemically untreated TNBC patient samples were selected from the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) dataset for the study. The log-rank test was used to analyze the relationship between miRNA expression and survival time; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Statistical Analysis
All quantified data represents an average of triplicate samples or as indicated. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test using GraphPad Prism 8.0 Software (GraphPad Software, Inc., CA, USA). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and p<0.05 are considered statistically significant.
Results
Identification of Differentially Expressed miRNA
The analysis of differentially expressed miRNAs in TNBC using miRNA seq data from TNBC patients and normal tissue samples yielded 353 differentially expressed miRNAs, including 110 upregulated and 243 downregulated miRNAs, as shown in the volcano plot (Figure 1). miR-204, miR-6068, miR-139, miR-26a and miR-215 were the top five downregulated miRNAs identified.
Figure 1.
Volcano Plot of Differentially Expressed miRNAs in TNBC. miRNAs with p-value < 0.05, log2FC ≥ 1 (upregulated, red) and log2FC ≤ −1 (downregulated, blue).
KEGG Pathway and GO Enrichment Analysis of the Downregulated miRNAs
KEGG pathway and GO enrichment analysis were conducted to elucidate the functional roles of the top five downregulated miRNAs. The analysis revealed several enriched KEGG pathways and GO terms associated with the downregulated miRNAs, miR-204, miR-6068, miR-139, miR-26a and miR-215. The top 10 enriched KEGG pathways and GO terms with p<0.05 are correlated with various pathways and hallmarks of cancer (Figures 2 and 3). The top 10 GO enrichment terms and KEGG pathways of the downregulated miRNAs demonstrated a diverse spectrum of pathways, biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions influenced by miRNAs. The enriched GO terms highlighted their involvement in critical cellular processes such as regulation of transcription, signal transduction, phosphorylation, cell differentiation, apoptotic process, cell cycle, cell division, cell proliferation, and angiogenesis. It was found that miR-204, miR-139, and miR-26a were associated with molecular functions like protein binding, and miR-204 and miR-139 were enriched with metal ion binding, and RNA polymerase II core promoter proximal region activity. These findings highlight the multifaceted roles of the miRNAs in modulating critical biological processes and suggest their potential significance in various cellular and molecular pathways in TNBC.
Figure 2.
Bubble Plot of the Top 10 KEGG Pathway Enrichment of the Target Genes of miRNAs (miR-204, miR-6068, miR-139, miR-26a and miR-215) with p value<0.05. Bubble color and size correspond to p-value and gene count, respectively. Gene ratio indicates the number of differentially expressed genes to the number of total genes in a pathway.
Figure 3.
Top 10 GO Terms of Three Categories (Biological Processes, Cellular Components, Molecular Functions) of the target genes of miRNAs (miR-204, miR-6068, miR-139, miR-26a and miR-215) with p value<0.05. Gene ratio is the ratio of the number of genes present in this GO term over the total number of genes in this category.
qRT-PCR Validation of Downregulated miRNAs in TNBC Cell Lines
To further validate the analysis, qRTPCR was performed for the top five downregulated miRNAs (miR204, miR6068, miR-139, miR-26a, and miR215). Among them, miR-204 showed the most significant downregulation. Additionally, miR-139 and miR-26a were significantly downregulated in all the TNBC cell lines, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 and HCC1937, compared to the non-tumorigenic cell line MCF 10A (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Validation of Differential miRNA Expression by qRT-PCR. Relative miRNA expression of miR-204, miR-6068, miR-139, miR-26a, and miR-215 in TNBC and control cell lines. Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments and were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed byDunnett’s multiple comparison test using GraphPad PRISM 8.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc). Means were considered significant if p < 0.05 indicated as; * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, ****p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.
Survival Prediction of miRNAs
To further validate the findings, Kaplan-Meier analysis of systemically untreated TNBC patients from the METABRIC cohort was performed to assess the overall survival (OS) probability associated with the miRNAs and explore the effect of their differential expression. The analysis showed that patients with higher expression of miR-204 had a significantly higher survival rate (Figure 5). Therefore, it can be speculated that the expression of miR-204 may have a profound impact on the survival rate of TNBC patients.
Figure 5.
Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis of the Differentially Expressed miRNAs, miR-204, miR-139, miR-26a and miR-215. Survival analysis curves with log rank p test < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Discussion
TNBC is a highly heterogeneous disease with limited therapeutic options, underscoring the urgent need to identify therapeutic targets and predictive biomarkers [13]. Various novel strategies have been clinically evaluated in TNBC patients, such as targeting poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), receptor tyrosine kinases, etc [14]. Unfortunately, these treatments have resulted in significant drug resistance in patients. Tumor suppressor miRNAs play a vital role in regulating various cellular processes involved in tumorigenesis and metastasis [15, 16]. By leveraging the extensive gene expression data available in GEO datasets, we systematically identified the downregulated miRNAs that may act as tumor suppressors in TNBC, offering potential therapeutic options for this challenging disease. Three GEO microarray datasets and one deep sequencing dataset containing the miRNA expression profiles from the TNBC patients and healthy controls were chosen for differential expression analysis to identify the tumor suppressor miRNA candidates. Our study identified miR-204, miR-6068, miR-139, miR-26a and miR-215 as the top five downregulated miRNAs. Of these miRNAs, miR-215 was found to be downregulated in breast cancer [17], non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) [18] and colorectal cancer [19], whereas it is upregulated and promotes the progression of nasopharyngeal cancer [20] and gastric cancer [21]. Studies in breast cancer [22-24], nasopharyngeal cancer [25-27], NSCLC [28-30], gastric cancer [31-33] and colorectal cancer [34-36] have shown that miR-204, miR-139, miR-26a are downregulated in tumor samples compared to the normal samples and thus indicates the therapeutic potential of these miRNAs. However, not many studies have explored the levels of miR-6068. Our subsequent qRT-PCR validation confirmed that miR-204, miR-139 and miR-26a were significantly downregulated in TNBC cell lines compared to non-tumorigenic breast cell lines. This validation underscores the potential therapeutic significance of these miRNAs in TNBC.
To understand the molecular functions of these miRNAs, miRNA targets were predicted using the TargetScan database and GO, and KEGG pathway analysis was performed using the DAVID online bioinformatics tool. The enriched GO terms revealed that miR-204, miR-139, and miR-26a are linked to key cellular processes like transcription regulation, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis. These miRNAs show associations with protein binding, with miR-204 and miR-139 also involved in metal ion binding. miR-204, miR-139, and miR-26a participate in RNA polymerase II promoter activity, which is important for regulating cell cycle dynamics in cancer cells [37-39]. Static cancer cells hinder cancer therapy by halting transcription and RNA polymerase II, leading to DNA double-strand breaks and chromosomal aberrations, which drive cancer progression [40, 41]. We hypothesize that regulating those identified miRNAs can disrupt this dormancy and inhibit TNBC development. Interestingly, the immune system plays a major role in miR-26a, miR-139 and miR-6068 in the pathway analysis.
It is significant to identify a miRNA signature capable of predicting survival in TNBC patients. This is the first study reporting that miR-204 could be a therapeutic option for TNBC based on patient data analysis, with patients with high miR-204 expression showing better survival outcomes. miR-26a and miR-215 showed no significant association with survival, while miR-139 was linked to poorer survival outcomes. However, miR-26a, miR-215, and miR-139 have been reported as tumor suppressors in TNBC, suggesting their roles in inhibiting tumor growth and progression in this subtype [42-44]. No data was available to ascertain the role of miR-6068 in patient survival, potentially due to its low expression levels in tumor samples or limited data points in the patient cohort for this specific miRNA. Recently, one study reported the lower expression of miR-6068 in renal cancer cell carcinoma [45], and further studies are required to understand its role in TNBC. Fewer studies have shown miR-204 as a tumor suppressor and highlighted the therapeutic potential of miR-204 in TNBC [46, 47]. Studies have shown that miR-204 inhibits tumor growth and metastasis by targeting key regulatory pathways [48-50]. This underscores the importance of miR-204 in tumorigenesis and suggests that restoring its expression could have therapeutic implications in TNBC. While these findings are promising, the limited patient cohort in our study constrains the statistical strength of the results, underscoring the need for further validation in larger, more diverse cohorts to confirm the therapeutic value of miR-204. More studies must include miR-204 in larger, TNBC-specific cohorts that could clarify its potential role as a therapeutic molecule. To our knowledge, no clinical trials have been performed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of miR‐204 in TNBC.
Several limitations need to be considered in this study. Firstly, the heterogeneity of tumor samples within GEO datasets poses a significant challenge. Tumor samples collected from different patients at varying stages of disease progression and subjected to other treatments may display considerable variability in miRNA expression profiles. This inherent heterogeneity increases the risk of false-positive or false-negative results and limits the reproducibility and generalizability of findings. Variations in experimental protocols and platforms, such as microarray or RNA sequencing technologies, may lead to discrepancies in miRNA expression data. Additionally, the need for standardized protocols for data preprocessing and normalization further complicates comparing and integrating data from different studies. The heterogeneity of tumor samples within GEO datasets, differences in sample processing and miRNA profiling platforms, and the lack of matched normal tissue samples may introduce variability and bias into the results.
In conclusion, TNBC is a highly heterogeneous disease with limited therapeutic options, necessitating the identification of therapeutic targets and predictive biomarkers. Various novel strategies have been explored, including targeting PARP, EGFR, and Src tyrosine kinase, but significant improvements in patient outcomes have not been achieved. Leveraging big data analysis of GEO datasets and further validation, this study identified miR-204 as a promising therapeutic option for inhibiting tumor progression and managing TNBC.
Author Contribution Statement
Methodology and Writing – original draft: KU; Data curation: KU; Supervision, Idea, Writing – review & editing: PS and RMRK; Data analysis: KCS; All authors approve the preparation and submission of the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, for the facilities and support. KU thanks the Council of Science and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India, for the fellowship. RMRK gratefully acknowledges the support from JSS College of Pharmacy, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
Funding Statement
We acknowledge the financial support received from the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (Grant no: D.O. NO. BT/HRD/35/02/2006), Indian Council of Medical Research, Government of India (F.No. EMDR/SGll3l2023-2686), and intramural funding from Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
The work is part of an approved PhD thesis of KU by Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India and part of Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, Grant No. D.O. NO. BT/HRD/35/02/2006.
Availability of Data
The datasets in this study are available from GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), TargetScan (https://www.targetscan.org/), and Kaplan-Meier plotter (http://kmplot.com/analysis/)
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare no competing interests
References
- 1.Statello L, Guo CJ, Chen LL, Huarte M. Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAs and its biological functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(2):96–118. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00315-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang Z, Wang H, Zhou S, Mao J, Zhan Z, Duan S. Mirna interplay: Mechanisms and therapeutic interventions in cancer. MedComm – Oncology. 2024;3(4):e93. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Budakoti M, Panwar AS, Molpa D, Singh RK, Busselberg D, Mishra AP, et al. Micro-RNA: The darkhorse of cancer. Cell Signal. 2021;83:109995. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.109995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pajares MJ, Alemany-Cosme E, Goni S, Bandres E, Palanca-Ballester C, Sandoval J. Epigenetic Regulation of microRNAs in Cancer: Shortening the Distance from Bench to Bedside. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:14. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pekarek L, Torres-Carranza D, Fraile-Martinez O, Garcia-Montero C, Pekarek T, Saez MA, et al. An Overview of the Role of MicroRNAs on Carcinogenesis: A Focus on Cell Cycle, Angiogenesis and Metastasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(8):7268. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Geyer FC, Pareja F, Weigelt B, Rakha E, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, et al. The Spectrum of Triple-Negative Breast Disease: High- and Low-Grade Lesions. Am J Pathol. 2017;187(10):2139–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang C, Sun C, Zhao Y, Wang Q, Guo J, Ye B, et al. Overview of MicroRNAs as Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for High-Incidence Cancers in 2021. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(19):11389. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu Y, Gong W, Panoutsopoulou K, Singer-Cornelius T, Augustin K, Bronger H, et al. Association of high miR-27a, miR-206, and miR-214 expression with poor patient prognosis and increased chemoresistance in triple-negative breast cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2023;13(6):2471–87. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Song S, Johnson KS, Lujan H, Pradhan SH, Sayes CM, Taube JH. Nanoliposomal Delivery of MicroRNA-203 Suppresses Migration of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer through Distinct Target Suppression. Noncoding RNA. 2021;7(3):45. doi: 10.3390/ncrna7030045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Noyan S, Andac Ozketen A, Gurdal H, Gur Dedeoglu B. miR-770-5p regulates EMT and invasion in TNBC cells by targeting DNMT3A. Cell Signal. 2021;83:109996. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.109996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xu X, Zhang Y, Jasper J, Lykken E, Alexander PB, Markowitz GJ, et al. MiR-148a functions to suppress metastasis and serves as a prognostic indicator in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(15):20381–94. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen H, Li Z, Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Wang Y, et al. MicroRNA-200c Inhibits the Metastasis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Targeting ZEB2, an Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Regulator. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2020;50(4):519–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mahmoud R, Ordonez-Moran P, Allegrucci C. Challenges for Triple Negative Breast Cancer Treatment: Defeating Heterogeneity and Cancer Stemness. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:17. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ou Y, Wang M, Xu Q, Sun B, Jia Y. Small molecule agents for triple negative breast cancer: Current status and future prospects. Transl Oncol. 2024;41:101893. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.101893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wu HH, Leng S, Sergi C, Leng R. How MicroRNAs Command the Battle against Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(11):5865. doi: 10.3390/ijms25115865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Subramanian K, Sinha R. Functions of Differentially Regulated miRNAs in Breast Cancer Progression: Potential Markers for Early Detection and Candidates for Therapy. Biomedicines. 2024;12(3):691. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12030691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yao J, Zhang P, Li J, Xu W. MicroRNA-215 acts as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer by targeting AKT serine/threonine kinase 1. Oncol Lett. 2017;14(1):1097–104. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang Y, Zhang H, Li X. MicroRNA-215 promoted the progression of nasopharyngeal carcinoma through targeting RB1 and activating Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. J BUON. 2020;25(3):1579–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cai X, Peng D, Wei H, Yang X, Huang Q, Lin Z, et al. miR-215 suppresses proliferation and migration of non-small cell lung cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 2017;13(4):2349–53. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.5692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zang Y, Wang T, Pan J, Gao F. miR-215 promotes cell migration and invasion of gastric cancer cell lines by targeting FOXO1. Neoplasma. 2017;64(4):579–87. doi: 10.4149/neo_2017_412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vychytilova-Faltejskova P, Merhautova J, Machackova T, Gutierrez-Garcia I, Garcia-Solano J, Radova L, et al. MiR-215-5p is a tumor suppressor in colorectal cancer targeting EGFR ligand epiregulin and its transcriptional inducer HOXB9. Oncogenesis. 2017;6(11):399 . doi: 10.1038/s41389-017-0006-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hong BS, Ryu HS, Kim N, Kim J, Lee E, Moon H, et al. Tumor Suppressor miRNA-204-5p Regulates Growth, Metastasis, and Immune Microenvironment Remodeling in Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2019;79(7):1520–34. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dai H, Gallagher D, Schmitt S, Pessetto ZY, Fan F, Godwin AK, et al. Role of miR-139 as a surrogate marker for tumor aggression in breast cancer. Hum Pathol. 2017;61:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu T, Wang Z, Dong M, Wei J, Pan Y. MicroRNA-26a inhibits cell proliferation and invasion by targeting FAM98A in breast cancer. Oncol Lett. 2021;21(5):367. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zong G, Han J, Yue Z, Liu Y, Cui Z, Shi L. Downregulation of miR-204 facilitates the progression of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by targeting CXCR4 through NF-kappaB signaling pathway. J BUON. 2020;25(2):1098–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shao Q, Zhang P, Ma Y, Lu Z, Meng J, Li H, et al. MicroRNA-139-5p affects cisplatin sensitivity in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by regulating the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Gene. 2018;652:48–58. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yu L, Lu J, Zhang B, Liu X, Wang L, Li SY, et al. miR-26a inhibits invasion and metastasis of nasopharyngeal cancer by targeting EZH2. Oncol Lett. 2013;5(4):1223–8. doi: 10.3892/ol.2013.1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liang CY, Li ZY, Gan TQ, Fang YY, Gan BL, Chen WJ, et al. Downregulation of hsa-microRNA-204-5p and identification of its potential regulatory network in non-small cell lung cancer: RT-qPCR, bioinformatic- and meta-analyses. Respir Res. 2020;21(1):60 . doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-1274-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yong-Hao Y, Xian-Guo W, Ming X, Jin-Ping Z. Expression and clinical significance of miR-139-5p in non-small cell lung cancer. J Int Med Res. 2019;47(2):867–74. doi: 10.1177/0300060518815379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li L, Li D, Chen Y. miRNA-26a blocks interleukin-2-mediated migration and proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cells via vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. Transl Cancer Res. 2020;9(3):1768–78. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.02.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang S, Chen B, Zhang B, Li C, Qiu Y, Yang H, et al. miR2045p promotes apoptosis and inhibits migration of gastric cancer cells by targeting HER2. Mol Med Rep. 2020;22(4):2645–54. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hou J, Zhuo H, Chen X, Cheng J, Zheng W, Zhong M, et al. MiR-139-5p negatively regulates PMP22 to repress cell proliferation by targeting the NF-kappaB signaling pathway in gastric cancer. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16(7):1218–29. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.40338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li Y, Wang P, Wu LL, Yan J, Pang XY, Liu SJ. miR-26a-5p Inhibit Gastric Cancer Cell Proliferation and Invasion Through Mediated Wnt5a. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:2537–50. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S241199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang C, Tan R, Peng L, Zhang J. Relationship between miR-204 and ANGPTL2 expression and diagnosis, pathological stage, and prognosis in patients with colon cancer. Transl Cancer Res. 2021;10(8):3788–96. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ma J, Wang P, Huang L, Qiao J, Li J. Bioinformatic analysis reveals an exosomal miRNA-mRNA network in colorectal cancer. BMC Med Genomics. 2021;14(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12920-021-00905-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li Y, Sun Z, Liu B, Shan Y, Zhao L, Jia L. Tumor-suppressive miR-26a and miR-26b inhibit cell aggressiveness by regulating FUT4 in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(6):e2892. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Archuleta SR, Goodrich JA, Kugel JF. Mechanisms and Functions of the RNA Polymerase II General Transcription Machinery during the Transcription Cycle. Biomolecules. 2024;14(2):176. doi: 10.3390/biom14020176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Delgado-Roman I, Munoz-Centeno MC. Coupling Between Cell Cycle Progression and the Nuclear RNA Polymerases System. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:691636. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.691636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhou S, Van Bortle K. The Pol III transcriptome: Basic features, recurrent patterns, and emerging roles in cancer. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2023;14(5):e1782. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yoshioka KI, Kusumoto-Matsuo R, Matsuno Y, Ishiai M. Genomic Instability and Cancer Risk Associated with Erroneous DNA Repair. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22: 12254. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li LY, Guan YD, Chen XS, Yang JM, Cheng Y. DNA Repair Pathways in Cancer Therapy and Resistance. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:629266. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.629266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu P, Tang H, Chen B, He Z, Deng M, Wu M, et al. miR-26a suppresses tumour proliferation and metastasis by targeting metadherin in triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015;357(1):384–92. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.11.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Koduru SV, Tiwari AK, Leberfinger A, Hazard SW, Kawasawa YI, Mahajan M, et al. A comprehensive ngs data analysis of differentially regulated mirnas, pirnas, lncrnas and sn/snornas in triple negative breast cancer. J Cancer. 2017;8(4):578–96. doi: 10.7150/jca.17633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dong L, Zhou D, Xin C, Liu B, Sun P. MicroRNA-139 Suppresses the Tumorigenicity of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells by Targeting SOX8. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:9417–28. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S268378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pesta M, Travnicek I, Kulda V, Ostasov P, Windrichova J, Houfkova K, et al. Prognostic Value of Tumor Tissue Up-regulated microRNAs in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) In Vivo. 2024;38(4):1799–805. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Toda H, Kurozumi S, Kijima Y, Idichi T, Shinden Y, Yamada Y, et al. Molecular pathogenesis of triple-negative breast cancer based on microRNA expression signatures: antitumor miR-204-5p targets AP1S3. J Hum Genet. 2018;63(12):1197–210. doi: 10.1038/s10038-018-0510-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Salinas-Vera YM, Marchat LA, Garcia-Vazquez R, Gonzalez de la Rosa CH, Castaneda-Saucedo E, Tito NN, et al. Cooperative multi-targeting of signaling networks by angiomiR-204 inhibits vasculogenic mimicry in breast cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2018;432:17–27. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sun Y, Yu X, Bai Q. miR-204 inhibits invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting FOXM1 in esophageal cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(10):12775–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Li P, Wang Q, Wang H. MicroRNA-204 inhibits the proliferation, migration and invasion of human lung cancer cells by targeting PCNA-1 and inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Int J Mol Med. 2019;43(3):1149–56. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.4044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 50.Su Y, Lu Y, An H, Liu J, Ye F, Shen J, et al. MicroRNA-204-5p Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Targeting the Regulator of G Protein Signaling 20. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2023;6(12):1817–28. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.3c00114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets in this study are available from GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), TargetScan (https://www.targetscan.org/), and Kaplan-Meier plotter (http://kmplot.com/analysis/)





