Abstract
Background
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) often presents with a wide range of neurological symptoms, and atypical manifestations can complicate its diagnosis. We report a rare case of peripartum PRES presenting with profound transient retrograde amnesia and orofacial automatisms, notably in the absence of generalized seizures.
Case presentation
A 29-year-old primigravida developed sustained hypertension during labor. Immediately postpartum, she experienced visual disturbances, followed by altered consciousness and lip-smacking movements. She subsequently developed profound but transient retrograde amnesia, including loss of autobiographical memory. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed characteristic findings of PRES in the bilateral parieto-occipital lobes, leading to a diagnosis of PRES secondary to preeclampsia.
Discussion
This case highlights that peripartum PRES can present with atypical neurological symptoms, such as transient global amnesia and facial automatisms, even in the absence of typical eclamptic seizures. Such presentations warrant a high index of suspicion and prompt brain MRI to ensure accurate diagnosis and timely intervention.
Keywords: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, Preeclampsia, Eclampsia, Epidural labor analgesia, Amnesia
Background
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), which occurs primarily due to edema in the posterior cerebral region, presents with acute neurological symptoms and distinctive findings on neuroimaging [1, 2]. While PRES has a favorable prognosis and its symptoms are typically reversible, delayed diagnosis or treatment can lead to permanent neurological sequelae or even death [3, 4]. The primary theory regarding the pathogenesis of PRES suggests that the condition occurs when severe hypertension overwhelms the brain’s autoregulatory capacity for blood flow regulation. This leads to endothelial dysfunction, increased vascular permeability, and subsequent vasogenic edema [1, 2]. Consequently, PRES presents with characteristic hyperintense lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [1, 2].
In obstetric patients, PRES is closely associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, especially preeclampsia and eclampsia. Most eclamptic patients exhibit imaging findings consistent with PRES [5–7], leading some to consider PRES and eclampsia as part of the same disease spectrum [6, 8]. However, PRES can present with a wide range of atypical symptoms, making diagnosis challenging.
This report details the case of a patient who developed acute central nervous system symptoms in the immediate postpartum period and was subsequently diagnosed with PRES.
Case presentation
A 29-year-old primigravida was admitted for labor management at 40 weeks and 1 day of gestation. The initial plan was for a conventional vaginal delivery without neuraxial analgesia. Her medical history was unremarkable. Her pregnancy had been uneventful, with maintenance of normotension and no signs of preeclampsia before admission. On admission, her initial blood pressure was 141/73 mmHg. Other physical findings were unremarkable, and no edema was observed. Labor progression was slow due to uterine inertia. The patient reported severe labor pain, and although pentazocine was administered, its analgesic effect was insufficient.
On the morning of hospital day 2, the patient’s labor was progressing slowly, and she was experiencing severe pain and significant maternal fatigue. Therefore, at 9:00 AM, the decision was made to proceed with labor augmentation and provide neuraxial analgesia, prompting the first consultation with the anesthesiology service. At the time of the consultation, the patient did not meet the diagnostic criteria for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), as her blood pressure elevations had been intermittent rather than sustained. Continuous epidural analgesia was initiated at 10:15 AM to manage her pain and fatigue, followed by the commencement of an oxytocin infusion for labor augmentation at 11:00 AM (Fig. 1). The epidural regimen consisted of intermittent boluses (5 mL every 45 min) of 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl (2 µg/mL) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) boluses (5 mL, 20-min lockout). Additional 5 mL boluses of 1.5% lidocaine were administered for breakthrough pain. Although the patient achieved adequate analgesia, it became insufficient over time, necessitating frequent self-administration via the PCEA and supplemental lidocaine boluses. Her blood pressure gradually increased, fluctuating between 140–180 and 70–90 mmHg during contractions and 110–130/60–80 mmHg between them (Fig. 1). Four hours after initiating epidural analgesia, the patient underwent vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery with the Kristeller maneuver. The newborn had Apgar scores of 9 and 10 at 1 and 5 min, respectively.
Fig. 1.
Clinical course before delivery. The timeline displays key clinical events, drug administrations, and vital signs in relation to the time of delivery. V: systolic blood pressure (mmHg); Λ: diastolic blood pressure (mmHg); ○: heart rate (bpm); ■: SpO2 (%), percutaneous oxygen saturation
Three minutes postpartum, the patient complained of blurred vision. One minute later, she developed a sudden decline in consciousness, with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of E4V1M1. Her oxygen saturation transiently dropped to 60–70%, requiring bag-valve-mask ventilation. Suspecting local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), the epidural infusion was immediately discontinued, and intravenous lipid emulsion therapy was initiated. Although generalized convulsions were not observed, the patient exhibited persistent involuntary facial movements, including blinking and lip-smacking. Her level of consciousness recovered to GCS E4V4M4 approximately 4 min later. Despite the improvement in consciousness, she displayed profound retrograde amnesia. The memory impairment was profound, manifesting as complete disorientation to person, place, and time, including the inability to recall her name and the events of her pregnancy and delivery. This severe amnestic state entirely resolved within 20 min (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Clinical course in the immediate postpartum period. The timeline displays the key clinical events (visual disturbance, altered consciousness, amnesia), drug administrations, and vital signs. V: systolic blood pressure (mmHg); Λ: diastolic blood pressure (mmHg); ○: heart rate (bpm); ■: SpO2 (%), percutaneous oxygen saturation; GCS: Glasgow coma scale (E, eye-opening; V, verbal response; M, motor response); BVM ventilation: bag-valve-mask ventilation
Subsequently, a complete diagnostic workup was performed. Given the central nervous system symptoms, an eclampsia-related pathology was suspected, and a continuous intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate was initiated 30 min postpartum. Urinalysis revealed a protein-to-creatinine ratio of 1.0. The serum lidocaine concentration, measured from a blood sample drawn at the same time, was reported the following day as being within the normal range. Her other laboratory findings are summarized in Table 1. Abnormal findings included leukocytosis, elevated C-reactive protein, hypoalbuminemia, hyperuricemia, and hyperammonemia. Mild elevations in AST, LDH, and CK were also observed. The coagulation profile was notable for elevated FDP and D-dimer with low antithrombin III levels, and blood gas analysis indicated metabolic acidosis. A non-contrast cranial computed tomography (CT) scan showed no evidence of intracranial hemorrhage. Subsequently, brain MRI revealed scattered, symmetric hyperintense signals on FLAIR sequences, predominantly in the parietal and occipital lobes bilaterally (Fig. 3). Based on these collective findings, the patient was diagnosed with PRES secondary to preeclampsia.
Table 1.
Laboratory findings 30 min postpartum
| Category | Test item | Result | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blood gas analysis | |||
| pH | 7.437 | ||
| PCO2 | 23.4 | mmHg | |
| PO2 | 193 | mmHg | |
| HCO3– | 15.5 | mmol/L | |
| BE | −7.3 | mmol/L | |
| MetHb | 2.9 | % | |
| Complete blood count | |||
| WBC | 21.6 | × 103/µL | |
| Neutrophil | 89 | % | |
| Lymphocyte | 7 | % | |
| RBC | 3.91 | × 10⁶/µL | |
| Hb | 12.1 | g/dL | |
| Hct | 33.1 | % | |
| Plt | 316 | × 103/µL | |
| Coagulation profile | |||
| PT-INR | 0.9 | ||
| APTT | 30.8 | sec | |
| Fibrinogen | 470 | mg/dL | |
| FDP | 23.8 | µg/mL | |
| D-dimer | 11.4 | µg/mL | |
| AT III | 57 | % | |
| Biochemistry | |||
| AST | 45 | U/L | |
| ALT | 18 | U/L | |
| LDH | 313 | U/L | |
| Creatinine | 0.84 | mg/dL | |
| eGFR | 66 | mL/min/1.73 m2 | |
| BUN | 10 | mg/dL | |
| Uric acid | 7 | mg/dL | |
| Total protein | 5.2 | g/dL | |
| Albumin | 2.4 | g/dL | |
| Sodium | 134 | mEq/L | |
| Potassium | 4 | mEq/L | |
| Calcium | 8.5 | mg/dL | |
| Chloride | 103 | mEq/L | |
| Magnesium | 2.1 | mg/dL | |
| Ammonia | 180 | µg/dL | |
| Inflammatory markers and others | |||
| CRP | 3.74 | mg/dL | |
| CK | 609 | U/L | |
PCO2 Partial pressure of carbon dioxide, PO2 Partial pressure of oxygen, HCO3– Bicarbonate, BE Base excess, MetHb Methemoglobin, WBC White blood cell, RBC Red blood cell, Hb Hemoglobin, Hct Hematocrit, Plt Platelet count, PT-INR Prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, APTT Activated partial thromboplastin time, FDP Fibrinogen degradation products, AT III Antithrombin III, AST Aspartate aminotransferase, ALT Alanine aminotransferase, LDH Lactate dehydrogenase, eGFR Estimated glomerular filtration rate, BUN Blood urea nitrogen, CRP C-reactive protein, CK Creatine kinase
Fig. 3.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Axial FLAIR images show hyperintensities in the parietal lobes (A) and occipital lobes (B) bilaterally. FLAIR: fluid-attenuated inversion recovery
Following delivery, the patient was admitted to the high care unit (HCU) for close monitoring (Fig. 4). At 2.5 h postpartum, her blood pressure increased again to 174/102 mmHg, and her visual disturbances recurred. Continuous intravenous nicardipine was initiated. The patient reported distorted perceptions of faces and objects, and visual field testing revealed central visual field defects in both eyes. These symptoms resolved completely within two hours with blood pressure control. On postpartum day 1, her blood pressure normalized, and magnesium sulfate was discontinued. On postpartum day 1, as her blood pressure stabilized and she remained neurologically asymptomatic, the continuous nicardipine infusion was stopped and replaced with oral nifedipine, and she was transferred from the HCU to the general ward. Her clinical course was uneventful thereafter, and she was discharged on postpartum day 6 without neurological sequelae. Her blood pressure remained stable during outpatient follow-up, and oral nifedipine was discontinued 35 days after discharge. A follow-up brain MRI was not performed as the patient was clinically asymptomatic.
Fig. 4.
Clinical course and management during the extended postpartum period. The chart illustrates the gradual tapering of intravenous nicardipine and the transition to oral nifedipine beginning on postpartum day 3, in parallel with the normalization of vital signs and subsequent discharge. V: systolic blood pressure (mmHg); Λ: diastolic blood pressure (mmHg); ○: heart rate (bpm); ■: SpO2 (%), percutaneous oxygen saturation
Discussion
Our patient was diagnosed with PRES secondary to preeclampsia based on sustained hypertension during labor, proteinuria, and characteristic MRI findings.
The differential diagnosis of acute peripartum neurological symptoms is broad and includes eclampsia, cerebrovascular events, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome, and amniotic fluid embolism [9, 10]. Given the use of continuous epidural analgesia in this case, LAST was also considered a primary differential diagnosis.
While eclampsia was indeed a primary consideration in the acute setting, two key factors prompted us to broaden the differential diagnosis. First, the patient did not experience a generalized tonic–clonic seizure, which is typically regarded as a hallmark of eclampsia in clinical practice in Japan. Second, the neurological symptoms occurred during continuous epidural analgesia, raising concern for local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), which needed to be urgently ruled out. These conditions were systematically excluded for the following reasons. LAST was initially prioritized due to its temporal association with epidural analgesia. However, the patient's symptoms did not align with the classic features of LAST, such as perioral numbness, generalized seizures, arrhythmias, and cardiovascular collapse. Furthermore, serum lidocaine concentration measured shortly after symptom onset was within the normal range, further ruling out this possibility. In cases like ours, where atypical neurological symptoms predominate, distinguishing LAST from conditions such as PRES or eclampsia can be challenging, as has been previously reported in the literature [11].
While cerebrovascular events were also considered, they were deemed less likely due to the transience of the focal neurological deficits and altered consciousness, as well as the lack of evidence of hemorrhage, infarction, or cerebral venous thrombosis on cranial CT and MRI. HELLP syndrome was ruled out, as the patient did not present with characteristic liver dysfunction or thrombocytopenia (Table 1). Similarly, amniotic fluid embolism was excluded due to the absence of typical features, such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), circulatory collapse, and severe respiratory distress.
Although formal diagnostic criteria for Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) have not been established, a clinical framework for its diagnosis has been proposed. This framework defines PRES by a triad of findings: (1) acute-onset neurological symptoms, (2) vasogenic edema on neuroimaging, and (3) reversibility of the clinical and/or radiological findings [5].
Our patient’s case satisfied all three criteria. She presented with acute neurological symptoms, including visual disturbances, altered consciousness, and transient global amnesia. Neuroimaging revealed characteristic vasogenic edema in the bilateral parieto-occipital lobes (Fig. 3). Finally, the rapid resolution of her symptoms following blood pressure control demonstrated clinical reversibility, strongly supporting the diagnosis of PRES secondary to preeclampsia.
Although this case was diagnosed as PRES secondary to preeclampsia, the clinical course deviated from that of typical eclampsia in two important aspects. First, the absence of a generalized tonic–clonic seizure was atypical for eclampsia-related PRES. While generalized tonic–clonic seizures are the most common presentation, focal seizures are also known to occur, albeit infrequently [12, 13]. In this case, a neurologist considered the lip-smacking observed during the episode of acute impaired consciousness to represent one of two possibilities, both of which are rare manifestations of PRES: facial clonus or orofacial automatisms as part of a focal seizure. This uncommon seizure presentation contributed to the initial consideration of an alternative diagnosis beyond eclampsia. Second, the presence of transient yet profound global amnesia was another distinguishing feature. The patient temporarily lost significant autobiographical memories, including those about her marriage, pregnancy, and even her own name. Although amnesia is a rare complication, similar cases of transient global amnesia associated with PRES have been reported, showing comparable amnestic symptoms and rapid resolution following blood pressure control [14]. Characteristically, the patient's amnesia occurred as part of the acute presentation of PRES, was not accompanied by delirium or evidence of structural brain damage, and resolved rapidly with blood pressure control. This highlights the diverse and often atypical clinical manifestations of PRES.
In retrospect, the patient’s initial complaint of visual disturbance might have represented an important prodromal symptom of PRES. Although the nature of visual symptoms can vary, they are a well-known early sign of PRES and often precede other neurological abnormalities [1, 2, 5]. In this case, the patient reported visual disturbances prior to both episodes of impaired consciousness, with the second episode, in particular, being consistent with the typical features of cortical blindness. This clinical course suggests vasogenic edema in the occipital lobes, consistent with the bilateral occipital FLAIR hyperintensities observed on MRI.
This case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for PRES in the peripartum setting, even in the absence of classic features such as sustained hypertension or generalized seizures. Transient and atypical neurological symptoms, such as orofacial automatisms and reversible retrograde amnesia, might serve as early indicators of PRES and should prompt timely neuroimaging and appropriate management.
In conclusion, we report a rare case of peripartum-onset PRES presenting with atypical neurological features, including orofacial automatisms and transient retrograde amnesia. Clinicians should consider PRES in the differential diagnosis of acute neurological changes during labor and in the immediate postpartum period, even in the absence of typical manifestations.
Abbreviations
- ALT
Alanine aminotransferase
- APTT
Activated partial thromboplastin time
- AST
Aspartate aminotransferase
- AT III
Antithrombin III
- BE
Base excess
- BUN
Blood urea nitrogen
- BVM
Bag-valve-mask
- CK
Creatine kinase
- CRP
C-reactive protein
- CT
Computed tomography
- DIC
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
- eGFR
Estimated glomerular filtration rate
- FDP
Fibrinogen degradation products
- FLAIR
Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery
- GCS
Glasgow coma scale
- Hb
Hemoglobin
- HCO3–
Bicarbonate
- Hct
Hematocrit
- HELLP
Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count
- LAST
Local anesthetic systemic toxicity
- LDH
Lactate dehydrogenase
- MetHb
Methemoglobin
- MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
- PCEA
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia
- PCO2
Partial pressure of carbon dioxide
- Plt
Platelet count
- PO2
Partial pressure of oxygen
- PRES
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome
- PT-INR
Prothrombin time-international normalized ratio
- RBC
Red blood cell
- SpO2
Percutaneous oxygen saturation
- WBC
White blood cell
Authors' contributions
SS was the primary anesthesiologist for the case, collected the data, and was a major contributor to writing the manuscript. MS and KM were also involved in the anesthetic management of the patient. MT made substantial contributions to the drafting and critical revision of the manuscript. TT supervised the case and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
No funding was received for this work.
Data availability
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Formal ethics approval was not required for this case report. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent to participate was obtained from the patient.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal upon request.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Hinchey J, Chaves C, Appignani B, Breen J, Pao L, Wang A, et al. A reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:494–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Casey SO, Sampaio RC, Michel E, Truwit CL. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: utility of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging in the detection of cortical and subcortical lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1199–206. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Servillo G, Bifulco F, De Robertis E, Piazza O, Striano P, Tortora F, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:230–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Roth C, Ferbert A. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: long-term follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:773–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fischer M, Schmutzhard E. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J Neurol. 2017;264:1608–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brewer J, Owens MY, Wallace K, Reeves AA, Morris R, Khan M, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in 46 of 47 patients with eclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(468):e1-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sardesai S, Dabade R, Deshmukh S, Patil P, Pawar S, Patil A. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES): evolving the mystery of eclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019;69:334–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Postma IR, Slager S, Kremer HP, de Groot JC, Zeeman GG. Long-term consequences of the posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in eclampsia and preeclampsia: a review of the obstetric and nonobstetric literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014;69:287–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Qureshi M, Huang J. Atypical case of posterior reversible encephalopathy in a pregnant patient without preeclampsia. Cureus. 2019;11: e5620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Triplett JD, Kutlubaev MA, Kermode AG, Hardy T. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES): diagnosis and management. Pract Neurol. 2022;22:183–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Etesse B, Letouzey V, Roger C, Lefauconnier A, Ripart J. L’anesthésie péridurale n’est pas la seule cause de troubles neurologiques centraux durant le travail obstétrical. Un cas de syndrome d’encéphalopathie postérieure réversible. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2011;30:57–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hinduja A. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: clinical features and outcome. Front Neurol. 2020;11:71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kastrup O, Gerwig M, Frings M, Diener HC. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES): electroencephalographic findings and seizure patterns. J Neurol. 2012;259:1383–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nakamizo T, Tsuzuki I, Koide T. Transient global amnesia with reversible white matter lesions: a variant of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome? Case Rep Neurol Med. 2015;2015: 541328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.



