Abstract
Based on the findings of a five-month study, the authors suggest that physicians should be more discriminating in using radiography of the skull, especially when dealing with patients who are minimally injured. The low incidence of fractures disclosed by radiography in patients with insignificant head injuries is a primary factor in arriving at this recommendation. A lack of correlation between skull fractures, and cerebral injury, and subsequent therapy is another factor. Finally, the prohibitive cost of medical care generally (and radiographs in particular) makes greater selectiveness imperative.
Although the number of cervical spine fractures in this study was small, the findings indicate that based on history and physical examination there can and should be increasing selectivity in ordering routine cervical spine series, without increasing the risk of missed fractures.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bell R. S., Loop J. W. The utility and futility of radiographic skull examination for trauma. N Engl J Med. 1971 Feb 4;284(5):236–239. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197102042840504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brewer B. J., Golden G. T., Hitch D. C., Rudolf L. E., Wangensteen S. L. Abdominal pain. An analysis of 1,000 consecutive cases in a University Hospital emergency room. Am J Surg. 1976 Feb;131(2):219–223. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(76)90101-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piazza G., Cristi G. The role of radiographic skull examination in the emergency evaluation of intracranial expanding lesions following closed head injuries. Neuroradiology. 1973 Oct;6(2):101–103. doi: 10.1007/BF00399816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]