Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Aug 25;20(8):e0330605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330605

Making MALDI-TOF MS for entomological parameters accessible: A practical guide for in-house library creation

Jonathan Karisa 1,*, Mercy Tuwei 1, Kelly Ominde 1, Brian Bartilol 1, Zedekiah Ondieki 1, Haron Musani 1, Martin Rono 1, Charles Mbogo 1, Philip Bejon 1,2, Joseph Mwangangi 1, Caroline Wanjiku 1, Marta Maia 1,2,3,*
Editor: Dina Aboelsoued4
PMCID: PMC12377598  PMID: 40853945

Abstract

Matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionisation time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a powerful analytical method that has been used extensively to identify sample ions of complex mixtures, and biological samples such as proteins, tissues and microorganisms. MALDI-TOF MS has revolutionised clinical microbiology with accurate, rapid, and inexpensive species-level identification of microbes. MALDI-TOF MS technology generates spectral signatures and matches them to a library of similar organisms using bioinformatics pattern matching. The use of MALDI-TOF MS for entomological samples has been explored by multiple groups with proven efficacy at differentiating between closely related species, as well as detecting pathogens in different vectors. The low cost per sample processing, rapid turnaround and robustness are attractive for surveillance of vector control programs. Libraries are built in-house for institutional usage, although a multi-user platform with sharing of spectra and data would be attractive. Only a few studies have strived to make their libraries publicly available. Here, we outline a stepwise approach for creating an in-house MALDI-TOF MS library and subsequent query, using malaria vector species identification as a case study for entomological samples. A protocol and video of the methodology are also shared. Moreover, the libraries related to this publication have been deposited in public repository (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VYQFNO37) for anyone with MALDI-TOF MS equipment to adapt.

Introduction

Vector control remains a cornerstone of malaria prevention, with vector surveillance playing a critical role in monitoring and evaluating control and research programs. However, for surveillance to be truly informative, high-quality data must be collected consistently across space and time, extending beyond simple vector densities and morphological identification. A major challenge is that molecular assays (essential for understanding vector species composition) are prohibitively expensive when applied to thousands of mosquitoes annually. As countries progress toward malaria elimination, gaining deeper insights into vectorial systems and transmission patterns becomes essential for designing end-game strategies. This underscores the urgent need for cost-effective tools that enable large-scale sample processing, ensuring robust data collection to drive informed decision-making in malaria control and elimination efforts.

MALDI-TOF MS represents one such tool. The technology has revolutionised diagnostics in the field of clinical microbiology allowing for faster turn-around time from sample preparation to obtaining precise and accurate results at a lower cost per sample [14]. Recently, MALDI-TOF has found valuable application in entomological surveillance. Numerous studies have assessed its performance, accuracy, and reliability for mosquito species and sub-species identification [58]. MALDI-TOF MS has also been evaluated for the identification of other arthropods, including Drosophila, [9,10], fleas [11], lice [12], ticks [1316], Ceratopogonides (biting midges), and sand flies [1719]. It has also has also been used to differentiate between infected and non-infected ticks [15,16,20]; Plasmodium-infected and non-infected An. stephensi [21] and Wolbachia-infected and non-infected Aedes aegypti [22]. MALDI-TOF MS has also been shown to distinguish between/among blood meals from different hosts [5,2325], age grading of malaria vectors [26] and insecticide resistance profiling [27].

Creating in house libraries can be challenging and often the number of institutions that have access to the instrument but that use it beyond microbiology is limited. We aim to demystify the process and share a detailed workflow for creating a MALDI-TOF MS library using malaria vector species identification as a case study. When well optimised, the spectra obtained from a single run can be used to develop other libraries and query other parameters including, for example, infectious status [21], age/parity [26], presence endosymbionts such as Microsporidia MB or Wolbachia [22], and potentially insecticide resistance [27]. Blood-engorged mosquito abdomens can be used for differentiation of blood meal sources [5].

The workflow involves a series of steps that begins with dissection of mosquitoes into three anatomical compartments: legs and wings, cephalothorax, and abdomen. Dissection is followed by protein extraction and acquisition of spectral profiles. Guided by results from gold standard tests (ELISA, PCR, taxonomy), a sub-set of high-quality spectra is then selected and used for training the machine algorithm and create a reference database (spectral library) (training dataset).

A high-quality spectrum should have a high number of well-defined, intense peaks with good signal-to-noise ratio, consistent peak positions across replicates, minimal background noise, and a set of prominent “marker peaks” specific to the analysed molecule, allowing for reliable identification and comparison against a reference database. The remaining spectra are used to determine the accuracy of the reference database in identifying unknown samples (validation dataset). The match level between the unknown sample and the reference database is estimated using the log score value (≥1.8 is considered a reliable identification). Once libraries are created these can be continuously improved by inclusion of additional reference spectra capturing potential variation between strains due to geographical difference brought about by genetic variations limited arising from limited genetic exchange/gene flow.

Here we share the methodological approach to creating MALDI TOF MS libraries for entomological samples using malaria vector species identification as an exemplary case study. Moreover, the libraries related to this publication have been deposited in public repository (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VYQFNO37) for anyone with MALDI-TOF MS equipment to adapt.

Materials and methods

Mosquito sampling

Mosquito samples were collected from 2019–2022 in three distinct ecological zones with different species composition viz., Kilifi, Taita-Taveta and Kwale Counties of Kenya. A description of mosquito sampling and processing is detailed in Karisa et al [5].

Ethical consideration and approvals

This study did not involve human samples; only mosquitoes were collected and analyzed. However, since collections were conducted at the household level, ethical approval was obtained from the Kenya Medical Research Institute Scientific and Ethics Review Unit (KEMRI SERU 4945) before commencing the study. Several protocols were used during the mosquito collection exercise. Informed consent was sought from all participating households. In some cases, verbal consent was obtained, while in others, written consent or permission was provided in the presence of local administration before setting up traps for mosquito collection.

Sample preparation and gold standards

The step-by-step protocol of the process here briefly described, is also available on protocols.io (dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.n2bvjdy3xvk5/v1) and is included as a supplementary file with this article (S1 File). Briefly, Anopheles mosquitoes were individually dissected into different body parts: legs, wings, cephalothorax and abdomen. The legs and wings or one half of the cephalothorax were used for species identification by PCR as the gold standard reference [2830] for the classification of MALDI-TOF MS spectra. The remaining half of the cephalothorax was homogenized, proteins were extracted and loaded onto a steel MALDI-target plate (Bruker Daltonics) as described earlier [5]. The prepared plate was then introduced into the Microflex machine (Bruker Daltonics) for spectral acquisition.

MALDI-TOF MS processing

The stepwise process of spectra acquisition, pre-processing, library creation and query (validation) has been previously described [5]. Furthermore, the step-by-step protocol of the process is also available on protocols.io (dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.n2bvjdy3xvk5/v1) and is included as a supplementary file with this article (S1 File).

Results

Mosquito molecular identification and spectra acquisition

A total of 2,332 mosquitoes, collected in Kenya [5], were morphologically identified as either Anopheles gambiae s.l or Anopheles funestus s.l and used for development of a MALDI-TOF MS species identification library. A total of 1,971 (85%) of the mosquitoes were accurately identified to species using molecular tools as quality control of reference library. The remaining 15% did not render sufficient DNA for PCR or were found not to be an anopheline by sequencing. Out of the 1,971 samples, various mosquito species were identified, including: An. gambiae s.s, An. arabiensis, An. merus, An. quadriannulatus, An. funestus s.s, An. rivulorum, and An. leesoni, making up the majority [5]. Of the 1,971 samples 5.2% produced poor-quality spectra and were therefore excluded, leaving a total of 1,782 for database creation and query (validation).

Reference spectral library creation

Reference libraries were created with 87 well characterized sample spectra belonging to An. gambiae (An. gambiae s.s – 10, An. arabiensis – 26, An. merus – 19, An. quadriannulatus – 14) and An. funestus (An. funestus s.s – 6, An. rivulorum – 6 and An. leesoni – 6) complexes were used for database creation. The libraries related to this publication have been deposited in public repository (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VYQFNO37) for anyone with MALDI-TOF MS equipment to adapt.

Reference spectral library query

Out of all the mosquito analysed by MALDI-TOF MS, 1,712/1782 were correctly identified with an accuracy of 96.1% [5]. The database was particularly precise in distinguishing An. gambiae and An. funestus complex members which clustered into three distinct branches: i) An. vaneedeni, An. funestus and An. parensis clustered, ii) An. gambiae complex, and iii) An. rivulorum and An. leesoni (Fig 1).

Fig 1. MSP dendrogram of MALDI-TOF MS spectra used for database creation for species identification and An. vaneedeni and An. parensis [5].

Fig 1

However, a few samples had low LSV values, suspected to be due to either protein degradation, physiological status or residual blood meals in the head and thorax (Fig 2). The application of the weighted LSV approach on the An. gambiae s.l samples that had ambiguous identification during querying, resulted in correct species identification congruent with the molecular analysis results, further improving the accuracy of species identification to 97.5% [5].

Fig 2. LSVs obtained after a database query with MS spectra belonging to members of An. gambiae and An. funestus complexes.

Fig 2

Horizontal dashed lines represent the cut-off point for reliable identification (LSV > 1.8). Abbreviations: A.U., arbitrary units, An., Anopheles, s.s, sensu stricto, LSV., Log Score value [5].

Impact of preservation method on mosquito identification and LSV distribution

With a well curated, preservation methods do not significantly impact on mosquito identification and LSV distribution as we noted that there was no significant difference (Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.19) in the median LSV among different methods of preservation (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Log Score Value (LSVs) obtained after MSP reference database query with MS spectra based on method of preservation.

Fig 3

Horizontal dashed lines represent the cut-off point for reliable identification (LSV > 1.8) [5].

Discussion

This article outlines a comprehensive procedure for utilisations of MALDI-TOF MS for malaria vector species identification. The accuracy in distinguishing between sibling species of the two Anopheles’ species complex (An. funestus s.l and An. gambiae s.l) demonstrates the discriminative power of MALDI-TOF MS. In the context of surveillance, the wide range of species representation should reflect as much as possible the diversity of mosquitoes in each study area. Different mosquito species play varied roles in disease transmission and have different feeding and resting proclivities. The composition of vectors paints a picture of the type of rigor required for effective entomological surveillance and the obvious benefit of using a highly sensitive tool such as MALDI-TOF MS. The spectra obtained from the head and thorax can simultaneously measure several entomological parameters if libraries are created for that purpose. In different studies, the head and thorax spectral pattern has been successfully used for species identification [5], pathogens infection status determination [21], endosymbionts [22] and age-grading [26]. More recently, a proof-of-concept study demonstrated that spectral patterns from the head and thorax were used for discriminating between resistant and susceptible mosquitoes [27]. Here, we propose using the head and thorax spectral for all future MALDI TOF MS spectra acquisition for malaria vector profiling. To make this technology accessible to all stakeholders, including national public health agencies and partners responsible for vector surveillance, it is essential to harmonize protocols and methodologies across research groups and institutions. Standardizing approaches will enable the development of a shared platform, ensuring consistency, comparability, and broader adoption of this technology in national malaria control programs.

In conclusion, the proposed work flow enables the creation of in-house MALDI-TOF MS libraries with relative ease (protocol and associated video are attached as supplementary files). MALDI TOF MS can be used to robustly identify mosquito species. The high accuracy and ability to distinguish complex species and visualise species relationships make this method valuable in entomological monitoring of primary Afrotropical malaria vectors and can be expanded to include other mosquito disease vectors.

Supporting information

S1 File. MALDI-TOF MS library development for insects.

This PDF contains the detailed step-by-step protocol for constructing MALDI-TOF MS reference database for insect identification.

(PDF)

pone.0330605.s001.pdf (793.5KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Scientific and technical teams at the Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi for help in design and implementation of this work. Many thanks to the technical and field staff (Festus Yaa, Gabriel Nzai, Robert Mwakesi and Martha Muturi) who devoted their time and assisted in the field collection of samples. This paper has been published with the permission of the Director of the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI).

Associated content

- Mosquito Database Creation Using MALDI TOF MS video demonstration available on YouTube (https://youtu.be/btS0hsx9yNw). The video shows the experimental steps of MALDI TOF MS database creation.

Data Availability

Sample data are fully available without restriction on Harvard Dataverse - https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VYQFNO

Funding Statement

MM - Investment 057212 - Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation - USA MR - FLR_R1_190497 - The Royal Society FLAIR fellowship grant- UK The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Dhiman N, Hall L, Wohlfiel SL, Buckwalter SP, Wengenack NL. Performance and cost analysis of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for routine identification of yeast. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(4):1614–6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02381-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dieckmann R, Helmuth R, Erhard M, Malorny B. Rapid classification and identification of salmonellae at the species and subspecies levels by whole-cell matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry . Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(24):7767–78. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01402-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier P-E, Rolain JM, et al. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(4):543–51. doi: 10.1086/600885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tran A, Alby K, Kerr A, Jones M, Gilligan PH. Cost Savings Realized by Implementation of Routine Microbiological Identification by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(8):2473–9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00833-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Karisa J, Ominde K, Tuwei M, Bartilol B, Ondieki Z, Musani H, et al. Utility of MALDI-TOF MS for determination of species identity and blood meal sources of primary malaria vectors on the Kenyan coast. Wellcome Open Res. 2024;8:151. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18982.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Müller P, Pflüger V, Wittwer M, Ziegler D, Chandre F, Simard F, et al. Identification of cryptic Anopheles mosquito species by molecular protein profiling. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yssouf A, Socolovschi C, Flaudrops C, Ndiath MO, Sougoufara S, Dehecq J-S, et al. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization--time of flight mass spectrometry: an emerging tool for the rapid identification of mosquito vectors. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e72380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yssouf A, Parola P, Lindström A, Lilja T, L’Ambert G, Bondesson U, et al. Identification of European mosquito species by MALDI-TOF MS. Parasitol Res. 2014;113(6):2375–8. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3876-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Campbell PM. Species differentiation of insects and other multicellular organisms using matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry protein profiling. Systematic Entomology. 2005;30(2):186–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2004.00279.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Feltens R, Görner R, Kalkhof S, Gröger-Arndt H, von Bergen M. Discrimination of different species from the genus Drosophila by intact protein profiling using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yssouf A, Socolovschi C, Leulmi H, Kernif T, Bitam I, Audoly G, et al. Identification of flea species using MALDI-TOF/MS. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;37(3):153–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2014.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ouarti B, Laroche M, Righi S, Meguini MN, Benakhla A, Raoult D, et al. Development of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for the identification of lice isolated from farm animals. Parasite. 2020;27:28. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2020026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Boucheikhchoukh M, Laroche M, Aouadi A, Dib L, Benakhla A, Raoult D, et al. MALDI-TOF MS identification of ticks of domestic and wild animals in Algeria and molecular detection of associated microorganisms. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;57:39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2018.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Karger A, Kampen H, Bettin B, Dautel H, Ziller M, Hoffmann B, et al. Species determination and characterization of developmental stages of ticks by whole-animal matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2012;3(2):78–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2011.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yssouf A, Almeras L, Berenger J-M, Laroche M, Raoult D, Parola P. Identification of tick species and disseminate pathogen using hemolymph by MALDI-TOF MS. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2015;6(5):579–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.04.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yssouf A, Almeras L, Terras J, Socolovschi C, Raoult D, Parola P. Detection of Rickettsia spp in ticks by MALDI-TOF MS. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(2):e0003473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaufmann C, Ziegler D, Schaffner F, Carpenter S, Pflüger V, Mathis A. Evaluation of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry for characterization of Culicoides nubeculosus biting midges. Med Vet Entomol. 2011;25(1):32–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2010.00927.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kumsa B, Laroche M, Almeras L, Mediannikov O, Raoult D, Parola P. Morphological, molecular and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry identification of ixodid tick species collected in Oromia, Ethiopia. Parasitol Res. 2016;115(11):4199–210. doi: 10.1007/s00436-016-5197-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mathis A, Depaquit J, Dvořák V, Tuten H, Bañuls A-L, Halada P, et al. Identification of phlebotomine sand flies using one MALDI-TOF MS reference database and two mass spectrometer systems. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:266. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0878-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fotso Fotso A, Mediannikov O, Diatta G, Almeras L, Flaudrops C, Parola P, et al. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry detection of pathogens in vectors: the Borrelia crocidurae/Ornithodoros sonrai paradigm. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(7):e2984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Laroche M, Almeras L, Pecchi E, Bechah Y, Raoult D, Viola A, et al. MALDI-TOF MS as an innovative tool for detection of Plasmodium parasites in Anopheles mosquitoes. Malar J. 2017;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1657-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rakotonirina A, Caruzzo C, Ballan V, Kainiu M, Marin M, Colot J, et al. Wolbachia detection in Aedes aegypti using MALDI-TOF MS coupled to artificial intelligence. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):21355. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00888-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Niare S, Almeras L, Tandina F, Yssouf A, Bacar A, Toilibou A, et al. MALDI-TOF MS identification of Anopheles gambiae Giles blood meal crushed on Whatman filter papers. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tandina F, Niaré S, Laroche M, Koné AK, Diarra AZ, Ongoiba A, et al. Using MALDI-TOF MS to identify mosquitoes collected in Mali and their blood meals. Parasitology. 2018;145(9):1170–82. doi: 10.1017/S0031182018000070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tandina F, Niare S, Almeras L, Davoust B, Doumbo OK, Raoult D, et al. Identification of mixed and successive blood meals of mosquitoes using MALDI-TOF MS protein profiling. Parasitology. 2020;147(3):329–39. doi: 10.1017/S003118201900163X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mohammad N, Naudion P, Dia AK, Boëlle P-Y, Konaté A, Konaté L, et al. Predicting the age of field Anopheles mosquitoes using mass spectrometry and deep learning. Sci Adv. 2024;10(19):eadj6990. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adj6990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Almeras L, Costa MM, Amalvict R, Guilliet J, Dusfour I, David J-P, et al. Potential of MALDI-TOF MS biotyping to detect deltamethrin resistance in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. PLoS One. 2024;19(5):e0303027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Scott JA, Brogdon WG, Collins FH. Identification of single specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex by the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993;49(4):520–9. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1993.49.520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Koekemoer LL, Kamau L, Hunt RH, Coetzee M. A cocktail polymerase chain reaction assay to identify members of the Anopheles funestus (Diptera: Culicidae) group. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;66(6):804–11. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lobo NF, Laurent BS, Sikaala CH, Hamainza B, Chanda J, Chinula D. Unexpected diversity of Anopheles species in Eastern Zambia: implications for evaluating vector behavior and interventions using molecular tools. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Dina Aboelsoued

26 May 2025

Dear Dr. Karisa,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

The procedures and results reported in this manuscript have largely been been published previously (https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18982.2) and the added value of this article appears somewhat limited.

In the abstract section, the authors wrote "Libraries are built in-house for institutional usage, although a multi-user platform with sharing of spectra and data would be attractive, it is not yet available." This sentence is erroneous and should revised, providing references to published studies that strived to develop a free identification service available online (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305167), a free open-source data analysis pipeline and share mass spectral data (https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06655-1).

I would also strongly recommend to the authors to deposit the mass spectra on a public repository to facilitate the widespread uptake of MALDI-TOF MS for mosquito species identification.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 10 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Dina Aboelsoued, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note you have not yet provided a protocols.io PDF version of your protocol and/or a protocols.io DOI. When you submit your revision, please provide a PDF version of your protocol as generated by protocols.io (the file will have the protocols.io logo in the upper right corner of the first page) as a Supporting Information file. The filename should be S1_file.pdf, and you should enter “S1 File” into the Description field. Any additional protocols should be numbered S2, S3, and so on. Please also follow the instructions for Supporting Information captions [https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information#loc-captions]. The title in the caption should read: “Step-by-step protocol, also available on protocols.io.”

Please assign your protocol a protocols.io DOI, if you have not already done so, and include the following line in the Materials and Methods section of your manuscript: “The protocol described in this peer-reviewed article is published on protocols.io (https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.[...]) and is included for printing purposes as S1 File.” You should also supply the DOI in the Protocols.io DOI field of the submission form when you submit your revision.

If you have not yet uploaded your protocol to protocols.io, you are invited to use the platform’s protocol entry service [https://www.protocols.io/we-enter-protocols] for doing so, at no charge. Through this service, the team at protocols.io will enter your protocol for you and format it in a way that takes advantage of the platform’s features. When submitting your protocol to the protocol entry service please include the customer code PLOS2022 in the Note field and indicate that your protocol is associated with a PLOS ONE Lab Protocol Submission. You should also include the title and manuscript number of your PLOS ONE submission.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“MM - Investment 057212 - Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation - USA

MR - FLR_R1_190497 - The Royal Society FLAIR fellowship grant- UK”

Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We noted in your submission details that a portion of your manuscript may have been presented or published elsewhere. “Utility of MALDI-TOF MS for determination of species identity and blood meal sources of primary malaria vectors on the Kenyan coast” in Wellcome Open Research (10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18982.2).“

Please clarify whether this [conference proceeding or publication] was peer-reviewed and formally published. If this work was previously peer-reviewed and published, in the cover letter please provide the reason that this work does not constitute dual publication and should be included in the current manuscript.

5. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

6. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

The procedures and results reported in this manuscript have largely been been published previously (https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18982.2) and the added value of this article appears somewhat limited.

In the abstract section, the authors wrote "Libraries are built in-house for institutional usage, although a multi-user platform with sharing of spectra and data would be attractive, it is not yet available." This sentence is erroneous and should revised, providing references to published studies that strived to develop a free identification service available online (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305167), a free open-source data analysis pipeline and share mass spectral data (https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06655-1).

I would also strongly recommend to the authors to deposit the mass spectra on a public repository to facilitate the widespread uptake of MALDI-TOF MS for mosquito species identification.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the protocol been described in sufficient detail??>

To answer this question, please click the link to protocols.io in the Materials and Methods section of the manuscript (if a link has been provided) or consult the step-by-step protocol in the Supporting Information files.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Does the protocol describe a validated method??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. If the manuscript contains new data, have the authors made this data fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the article presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: In this protocol paper, the authors present a method to develop reference databases for Anopheles species identification with MALDI-TOF MS in-house. The procedures and results reported in this manuscript have largely been been published previously (https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18982.2) and the added value of this article appears somewhat limited. In the abstract section, the authors wrote "Libraries are built in-house for institutional usage, although a multi-user platform with sharing of spectra and data would be attractive, it is not yet available." This sentence is erroneous and should revised, providing references to published studies that strived to develop a free identification service available online (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305167), a free open-source data analysis pipeline and share mass spectral data (https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06655-1). I would also strongly recommend to the authors to deposit the mass spectra on a public repository to facilitate the widespread uptake of MALDI-TOF MS for mosquito species identification.

Reviewer #2: The Lab Protocol titled " Making MALDI-TOF MS for entomological parameters accessible: A practical guide for in-house library creation was interesting and provided valuable information for readers. It will be publishable

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org

PLoS One. 2025 Aug 25;20(8):e0330605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330605.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 1


7 Jul 2025

Comments and response

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

The manuscript and associated figures and supplementary documents have been edited and aligned as per the PLOS ONE requirements

2. We note you have not yet provided a protocols.io PDF version of your protocol and/or a protocols.io DOI. When you submit your revision, please provide a PDF version of your protocol as generated by protocols.io (the file will have the protocols.io logo in the upper right corner of the first page) as a Supporting Information file. The filename should be S1_file.pdf, and you should enter “S1 File” into the Description field. Any additional protocols should be numbered S2, S3, and so on. Please also follow the instructions for Supporting Information captions [https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information#loc-captions]. The title in the caption should read: “Step-by-step protocol, also available on protocols.io.” Please assign your protocol a protocols.io DOI, if you have not already done so, and include the following line in the Materials and Methods section of your manuscript: “The protocol described in this peer-reviewed article is published on protocols.io (https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.[...]) and is included for printing purposes as S1 File.” You should also supply the DOI in the Protocols.io DOI field of the submission form when you submit your revision.

If you have not yet uploaded your protocol to protocols.io, you are invited to use the platform’s protocol entry service [https://www.protocols.io/we-enter-protocols] for doing so, at no charge. Through this service, the team at protocols.io will enter your protocol for you and format it in a way that takes advantage of the platform’s features. When submitting your protocol to the protocol entry service please include the customer code PLOS2022 in the Note field and indicate that your protocol is associated with a PLOS ONE Lab Protocol Submission. You should also include the title and manuscript number of your PLOS ONE submission.

The step-by-step protocol of the process here briefly described, is also available on protocols.io (dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.n2bvjdy3xvk5/v1) and is included as a supplementary file with this article

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: “MM - Investment 057212 - Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation – USA. MR - FLR_R1_190497 - The Royal Society FLAIR fellowship grant- UK”Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

4. We noted in your submission details that a portion of your manuscript may have been presented or published elsewhere. “Utility of MALDI-TOF MS for determination of species identity and blood meal sources of primary malaria vectors on the Kenyan coast” in Wellcome Open Research (10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18982.2). “Please clarify whether this [conference proceeding or publication] was peer-reviewed and formally published. If this work was previously peer-reviewed and published, in the cover letter please provide the reason that this work does not constitute dual publication and should be included in the current manuscript.

Utility of MALDI-TOF MS for determination of species identity and blood meal sources of primary malaria vectors on the Kenyan coast” in Wellcome Open Research (10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18982.2) is a peer reviewed publication. However, the current submission is a methodology manuscript detailing how to build a MALDI-TOF MS library for entomological samples and explaining the various technical steps analytical steps supported by a protocol. Although we present a case study on mosquitoes, this manuscript is relevant to this working on different insect classes. We detail this approach using data from a previously published article on Afro tropical malaria vectors. The present submission differs in scope and objectives from what has been previously published earlier which demonstrated the method’s ability to identify vectors compared to gold standard. The earlier paper has been referenced. The data from the previous published work is shown in this manuscript only as a case study to elucidate how to build the libraries and employ this technology.

5. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

All the data related to this publication has been deposited in the Harvard Dataverse. This includes the dataset, and MALDI-TOF MS Main Spectral Profiles (Libraries) for species identification (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VYQFNO37)

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

All the references are per as the PLOS one guidelines

Additional Editor Comments:

The procedures and results reported in this manuscript have largely been been published previously (https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18982.2) and the added value of this article appears somewhat limited.

The current submission is a methodology manuscript detailing how to build a MALDI-TOF MS library for entomological samples and explaining the various technical steps analytical steps supported by a protocol. Although we present a case study on mosquitoes, this manuscript is relevant to this working on different insect classes. We detail this approach using data from a previously published article on Afro tropical malaria vectors. The present submission differs in scope and objectives from what has been previously published earlier which demonstrated the method’s ability to identify vectors compared to gold standard. The earlier paper has been referenced. The data from the previous published work is shown in this manuscript only as a case study to elucidate how to build the libraries and employ this technology.

In the abstract section, the authors wrote "Libraries are built in-house for institutional usage, although a multi-user platform with sharing of spectra and data would be attractive, it is not yet available." This sentence is erroneous and should revised, providing references to published studies that strived to develop a free identification service available online (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305167), a free open-source data analysis pipeline and share mass spectral data (https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06655-1).

The sentence has been revised to read “Libraries are built in-house for institutional usage, although a multi-user platform with sharing of spectra and data would be attractive. Only a few studies have strived to make their libraries publicly available”

Moreover, the MALDI-TOF MS Main Spectral Profiles (Libraries) for species identification related to this publication has been deposited in public repository - Harvard Dataverse (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VYQFNO37)

I would also strongly recommend to the authors to deposit the mass spectra on a public repository to facilitate the widespread uptake of MALDI-TOF MS for mosquito species identification.

The MALDI-TOF MS Main Spectral Profiles (Libraries) for species identification related to this publication has been deposited in public repository i.e. the Harvard Dataverse (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VYQFNO37) for any one with MALDI-TOF MS equipment to adapt and update for their use

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0330605.s003.docx (17.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Dina Aboelsoued

17 Jul 2025

Dear Dr. Karisa

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 31 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Dina Aboelsoued, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise. 

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

The present submission demonstrated the method’s ability to identify vectors compared to gold standard. As the earlier paper has been referenced and used to show how to build the libraries and employ this technology.

Authors should shorten the details shown in the current manuscript referring to other published work

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Aug 25;20(8):e0330605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330605.r005

Author response to Decision Letter 2


20 Jul 2025

Comments and response

1. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited.

Response – In the previous review, the reviewers recommended two articles:

- (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305167), a free open-source data analysis pipeline and share mass spectral data

- (https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06655-1).

Upon reviewing these publications, we noted that the methods used differ from ours. Specifically, both studies employed R and Python scripts for post-acquisition spectral processing. In contrast, our study utilized the MALDI-Biotyper® software for spectral processing and analysis. None of these reference have been included in our manuscript. Regarding the recommendation to deposit mass spectra in a public repository, we confirm that all relevant data associated with this study have been deposited in the Harvard Dataverse. This includes both the raw dataset and the MALDI-TOF MS Main Spectral Profiles (MSPs) used for species identification. The data are accessible via the following DOI: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VYQFNO37

2. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Response – Following your suggestion on the references cited in our manuscript, we conducted a thorough review of all the references included in the manuscript. We confirm that none of the cited references appear to have been retracted, and all remain accessible through their respective journals or digital repositories. To the best of our knowledge, all references are from peer-reviewed and meet PLOSOne journal requirements. If the editors or reviewers have any specific concerns regarding individual references, we would be happy to address them promptly.

3. The present submission demonstrated the method’s ability to identify vectors compared to gold standard. As the earlier paper has been referenced and used to show how to build the libraries and employ this technology. Authors should shorten the details shown in the current manuscript referring to other published work

Response – The manuscript, especially the methods section, has been revised and the relevant published work and step-by-step protocol deposited in protocol.io has been referenced.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

pone.0330605.s004.docx (16.2KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Dina Aboelsoued

5 Aug 2025

Making MALDI-TOF MS for entomological parameters accessible: A practical guide for in-house library creation

PONE-D-25-21203R2

Dear Mr. Jonathan K Karisa

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Dina Aboelsoued, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Acceptance letter

Dina Aboelsoued

PONE-D-25-21203R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Karisa,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Dina Aboelsoued

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. MALDI-TOF MS library development for insects.

    This PDF contains the detailed step-by-step protocol for constructing MALDI-TOF MS reference database for insect identification.

    (PDF)

    pone.0330605.s001.pdf (793.5KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0330605.s003.docx (17.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

    pone.0330605.s004.docx (16.2KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    Sample data are fully available without restriction on Harvard Dataverse - https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VYQFNO


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES