Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2025 Aug 25;19(8):e0013328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013328

Remapping parasite landscapes: Nationwide prevalence, intensity and risk factors of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Rwanda

Ladislas Nshimiyimana 1,☯,*, Jean Bosco Mbonigaba 1,☯,*, Aimable Mbituyumuremyi 1, Alison Ower 2, Dieudonne Hakizimana 3,*, Elias Nyandwi 4, Karen Palacio 2, Alphonse Mutabazi 1, Jeanne Uwizeyimana 5, Leonard Uwayezu 6, Michee Kabera 1, Emmanuel Hakizimana 1, Phocas Mazimpaka 1, Emmanuel Ruzindana 7, Eliah Shema 8, Tharcisse Munyaneza 7, Jean Bosco Mucaca 7, Maurice Twahirwa 7, Esperance Umumararungu 7, Joseph Kagabo 8, Richard Habimana 8, Elias Niyituma 1, Tonya Huston 5, Jamie Tallant 2, Warren Lancaster 2, Nadine Rujeni 8, Eugene Ruberanziza 2
Editor: Angela Monica Ionica9
PMCID: PMC12377619  PMID: 40853975

Abstract

Background

Soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) and schistosomiasis (SCH) remain significant public health challenges in Rwanda, affecting individuals across all age groups. Despite ongoing mass drug administration (MDA) efforts, updated data on prevalence and risk factors are crucial for effective control and elimination strategies. This study reassessed the prevalence of STH and SCH in both children and adults in Rwanda, along with their associated risk factors, to guide control efforts.

Methodology

A nationwide survey was conducted across 30 districts, testing 17,360 individuals for STH and 17,342 for Schistosoma mansoni using Kato-Katz (KK) and Point-Of-Care Circulating Cathodic Antigen (POC-CCA) tests. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors while accounting for district-level variability.

Findings

The overall prevalence of STH was 38.7% (95% CI: 37.9–39.4), highest among adults (46.1%, 95% CI: 44.8–47.3) and lowest among preschool-aged children (30.2%, 95% CI: 29.0–31.5). Species-specific prevalence was 27.0% for Ascaris lumbricoides (95% CI: 26.3–27.6), 11.6% for Trichuris trichiura (95% CI: 11.2–12.1), and 10.7% for hookworm (95% CI: 10.3–11.2). Moderate-to-heavy intensity (MHI) infections were detected in 8.1% of Ascaris lumbricoides (95% CI: 7.7–8.5), 0.8% of Trichuris trichiura (95% CI: 0.6–0.9), and 0.1% of hookworm (95% CI: 0–0.2). SCH prevalence was 1.7% (95% CI: 1.5–1.9) by KK and 27.2% (95% CI: 26.5–27.9) when trace results on POC-CCA were considered positive. Heavy Schistosoma mansoni infections were rare (0.1%, 95% CI: 0–0.1). Mixed-effects logistic regression (p < 0.05) showed that for STH, higher odds were associated with being single (AOR: 1.74), no education (AOR: 1.56), use of human excreta as manure (AOR: 1.43), unimproved water sources (AOR: 1.17), and proximity to marshlands (AOR: 1.17). Lower odds were seen among those with higher education (AOR: 0.55), unemployed (AOR: 0.34), self-employed or retired (AOR: 0.53), students (AOR: 0.54), those with deep toilets (AOR: 0.78), and those treating water consistently (AOR: 0.79). For SCH, higher odds were linked to being single (AOR: 1.61), no education (AOR: 1.41), proximity to lakes (AOR: 1.76) or rice fields (AOR: 1.31), use of treated (AOR: 1.32) or untreated (AOR: 1.60) excreta as manure, and living over an hour from a water source (AOR: 1.42).

Conclusion

STH and SCH remain significant public health challenges in Rwanda, with certain regions and population groups still exceeding the elimination threshold as public health problems. Expanding MDA programs to include adults, improving sanitation and hygiene, ensuring universal access to clean water, and promoting community education on safe practices are essential for achieving sustainable control and elimination of these infections.

Author summary

Worm infections, like soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) and schistosomiasis (SCH), continue to affect people of all ages in Rwanda. Despite efforts to control these infections through regular treatment programs, more up-to-date information on how common they are and what increases the risk of getting them is needed to improve control measures. This study examined the current situation across people aged 1 year and above in Rwanda.

We carried out a nationwide survey in all 30 districts of Rwanda, testing 17,360 people for worm infections. The results showed that 38.7% of people had intestinal worms, with adults being the most affected (46.1%) and preschool-aged children the least affected (30.2%). The percentage of infected people varied widely between districts, ranging from 8.6% to 85.1%. Among the worms, roundworms were the most common (27.0%), followed by whipworms (11.6%) and hookworms (10.7%). Most infections were mild, with fewer cases of moderate-to-heavy infections, which are of greater concern due to their severe health consequences.

For schistosomiasis, the percentage of people infected ranged from 0% to 38.3% using the standard testing method and up to 74.6% when results from a newer method were included. Heavy intensity infections were rare, with only a small percentage (0.1%) of cases showing higher levels of infection.

We identified certain groups that were more likely to have these infections. For intestinal worms, a higher likelihood was seen among single people, those without education, those using treated human excreta as manure, relying on unsafe water sources, and living near marshy areas. On the other hand, people with higher education, clean water, better sanitation, and certain job types were less likely to have infections. For schistosomiasis, the likelihood of infection was higher for those who were single, without education, lived near lakes or rice farms, used human excreta as manure, and lived far from water sources.

Intestinal worms and schistosomiasis remain significant public health challenges in Rwanda. This study highlights the need for continued treatment programs, improved water, sanitation, and hygiene services, and targeted interventions to protect high-risk groups and areas. These measures are essential for reducing the burden of these infections and working toward their elimination.

Introduction

The persistent burden of soil-transmitted helminthiases (STH) and schistosomiasis (SCH) in Rwanda, as in many sub-Saharan African countries, highlights the need for updated data to guide targeted strategies. STH, caused by Ascaris lumbricoides (roundworm), Ancylostoma duodenale/Necator americanus (hookworm), and Trichuris trichiura (whipworm), affects over 1.5 billion people, or 24% of the global population, while SCH impacts over 251 million individuals globally who require preventive treatment, with 90% of cases in Africa [1,2].

STH are transmitted through ingestion of eggs (in the case of Ascaris and Trichuris) or skin penetration by larvae (in the case of hookworms), often due to poor sanitation and hygiene. SCH, caused by Schistosoma species, is acquired through skin contact with freshwater containing cercariae released by infected snails, particularly in areas near lakes, rivers, and wetlands [3]. Both infections contribute to a substantial public health burden, particularly among school-aged children (SAC) and agricultural communities. They are associated with anemia, malnutrition, stunting, cognitive impairment, and, in chronic SCH cases, hepatosplenic or urogenital complications [4,5].

In Rwanda, a national survey in 2007–2008 reported an STH prevalence of 65.8% and a SCH prevalence of 2.7%. In response, the Rwandan Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) Programme launched mass drug administration (MDA) in 2008, targeting preschool-aged children (pre-SAC), SAC, and selected adults. Albendazole (ALB) or mebendazole (MBZ) was administered biannually, while praziquantel (PZQ) was co-administered in districts with SCH prevalence over 10%. These programs achieved high coverage, with over 90% for ALB (or MBZ) and 75% for PZQ [68].

By 2014, an impact assessment demonstrated significant progress. STH prevalence among SAC dropped from 65.8% to 45.2%, though district-level variations remained high, ranging from 2.1% to 89.6%. Ascariasis was the most prevalent STH infection (37.2%), followed by Trichuriasis (22.8%), while hookworm prevalence was 4.5% [9]. For SCH, Schistosoma mansoni prevalence was 1.9% using the Kato-Katz (KK) method and 7.4% using the Point-of-Care Circulating Cathodic Antigen (POC-CCA) test—a rapid urine-based assay that detects schistosome antigens [1012]. Trace results were classified as negative in that analysis. A total of 127 sectors—administrative units below the district level—were identified as endemic for SCH. Following the 2014 remapping, annual community- and school-based MDA for STH continued nationwide, targeting pre-SAC, SAC, pregnant women, and breastfeeding mothers. In addition, PZQ was administered annually in the 127 SCH-endemic sectors [7].

Since the 2014 survey, Rwanda has undergone significant environmental and social changes alongside continuous high-coverage MDA, highlighting the need for a reassessment of STH and SCH. Access to improved water sources increased from 73.8% in 2014 to 80.4% in 2020, while the percentage of households with improved sanitation facilities saw a modest increase from 71.2% to 72.2% [13,14]. At the same time, developments such as expanded agricultural water use, hydroelectric projects, and the creation of artificial lakes may have inadvertently fostered conditions that support SCH transmission.

Evidence suggests that STH infections are more prevalent in adults, particularly in areas where school-based MDA programs have reduced infections in children but sustained transmission [15,16]. Additionally, assessing SCH in adults is crucial for informing treatment strategies [17]. However, MDA programs and evaluations in Rwanda have primarily focused on pre-SAC and SAC, with limited data on adults [8,9,1820]. Moreover, while the national health management information system captures STH and SCH cases diagnosed at facilities, it excludes individuals with low-intensity or asymptomatic infections who are less likely to seek care, underestimating transmission [21]. Additionally, previous studies that included adults were not nationally representative and often excluded SCH [22]. To address these gaps, comprehensive, updated, and representative data were needed to inform progress toward the World Health Organization’s (WHO) elimination targets of <2% prevalence of moderate-to-heavy intensity STH infections and <1% heavy-intensity SCH infections [23]. In response, this study reassessed the prevalence and risk factors of STH and SCH across the population aged 1 year and above in Rwanda to optimize control strategies, target interventions, and guide efforts toward eliminating these infections as public health problems.

Methods

Ethics statement

This study was conducted following ethical guidelines and received approval from the Rwanda National Ethics Committee (Approval No: 652/RNEC/2020). A written informed consent was obtained from all participants before data collection began. For participants under 18 years of age, written informed consent was obtained from parents or guardians, and assent was obtained from children aged 12–17 years. Participation was voluntary, and participants could withdraw at any time without consequences. For schoolchildren, permissions were sought from parents and schools to allow them to participate briefly, with transportation arranged to ensure their timely return to school.

Following the interview, those aged two years and above received a single dose of Albendazole (400 mg), while younger children received Mebendazole (500 mg). Samples were tested, and participants were informed promptly once the result was available. If participants needed to leave early, they could consent to have their results delivered via community health workers. Participants who tested positive for SCH and were aged five years or older received a single 600 mg dose of praziquantel while those under five years were referred to health centers for treatment per the national guidelines.

Study design

This study conducted a nationwide, community-based cross-sectional survey using an adapted precision mapping approach to assess the prevalence and identify risk factors associated with SCH and STH. Precision mapping focuses on sampling at a finer geographic scale, targeting more schools or villages within smaller administrative units to better capture the variability in SCH prevalence [24]. Following recommended guidelines, SCH and STH were mapped together, ensuring a comprehensive assessment [23,2527].

Study setting

Rwanda, a low-income, landlocked African nation, spans approximately 26.3 square kilometers and with a population of around 12.6 million in 2020, estimated to reach 13.8 million in 2024, resulting in one of the highest population densities in Africa at 501 residents per square kilometer [28,29]. The majority of the population, 72.1%, live in rural areas, with 69% engaged in agriculture. Among households, 63% practice crop farming, and 50% own at least one type of livestock [28]. In 2020, the GDP per capita was estimated at $816 and increased to $1,040 in 2023, with agriculture contributing 27% [30,31].

Rwanda is divided into five provinces: North, East, West, South, and the City of Kigali. Each province is further subdivided into districts, with a total of 30 districts nationwide. These districts are further divided into sectors (416 sectors in total), which are responsible for implementing development programs, delivering services, and promoting governance and social welfare. Sectors are subdivided into cells (2,148 cells), and each cell comprises villages, totaling 14,815 villages [32]. The Rwandan health system follows a traditional hierarchical cascade, structured as community, health center, district hospital, and referral and specialized hospitals [6,7].

Participants

The study participants included pre-SAC (1–4 years old), SAC (5–15 years old), and adults (16 years and above). Children aged from one year old were included because they are targeted in deworming programs, and surveys in similar settings to Rwanda have found that these children are also at risk of SCH infection when their parents or caregivers take them to high-risk areas [33].

Variables

Dependent variables.

Schistosomiasis status and intensity: S. mansoni was assessed by examining stool samples for schistosome eggs using the KK technique (duplicate slides), following WHO guidelines [34,35], and by testing urine samples using the POC-CCA method. For the main analysis, individuals were considered SCH-positive if they tested positive by either KK (presence of at least one S. mansoni egg) or POC-CCA, with trace results included as positive. This approach was selected for programmatic reasons, as the program aims to eliminate SCH by targeting all potentially infected individuals, including those with low-level or asymptomatic infections.

Additionally, results for KK alone were presented with S. mansoni intensity levels, classified by eggs per gram (epg) of feces. Light-intensity was defined as 1–99 epg, moderate-intensity as 100–399 epg, and heavy-intensity as ≥400 epg, as per WHO guidelines [34,35]. Furthermore, to illustrate variations in SCH prevalence based on test interpretation, we also presented SCH status when trace results for POC-CCA were considered negative and SCH status when an individual tested positive by either KK or POC-CCA but with trace results considered negative.

Schistosoma haematobium infection was assessed through gross haematuria and dipstick testing. In cases with haematuria, urine samples were centrifuged and examined microscopically for S. haematobium ova. As no ova were detected and haematuria was not a primary focus of this study, infection intensity classification for S. haematobium was not applicable and was therefore not included.

Any STH Status and Intensity: Any STH status indicates the presence of any STH infection, including Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm, and Trichuris trichiura. Participants were classified as having an STH infection if their stool samples tested positive for at least one egg of any helminth species using the KK technique with duplicate slides.

The intensity of STH infections was classified based on the number of epg of feces per WHO guideline [34,35]. For Ascaris lumbricoides, light-intensity infections were defined as 1–4,999 epg, moderate-intensity as 5,000–49,999 epg, and heavy-intensity as ≥50,000 epg. For Trichuris trichiura, light-intensity was 1–999 epg, moderate-intensity was 1,000–9,999 epg, and heavy-intensity was ≥ 10,000 epg. For hookworms, light-intensity was 1–1,999 epg, moderate-intensity was 2,000–3,999 epg, and heavy-intensity was ≥ 4,000 epg [34].

Independent variables

Age was recorded as the participant’s actual age and categorized into three groups: pre-SAC (1–4 years), SAC (5–15 years), and Adults (16 years and above). Certain variables were collected only for participants aged 10 years and above, including marital status (single, married, divorced, or widowed), education level (no education, primary, secondary, tertiary), and main occupation, defined as the participant’s primary source of income or work.

Other independent variables included the main source of household water, classified as improved (e.g., piped water, wells, and rainwater) or non-improved (all other sources). Additionally, the presence of a toilet facility was recorded, along with its depth if present (<3 meters deep or ≥3 meters deep). We also documented whether households used human feces as manure and whether they treated water before drinking, as well as the primary method of treatment among those who reported always treating drinking water. Participants’ knowledge about SCH and STH, including transmission, symptoms, and prevention, was also evaluated.

Data sources and measurement

Data collection tools.

The field data collection took place from 13th November to 24th December 2020, five months later after the MDA. The survey used a questionnaire to collect information on risk factors, knowledge, and attitudes related to STH and SCH among individuals aged 10 years and above, along with household conditions. It covered demographic details such as age, sex, education, occupation, and household attributes, as well as water sources, sanitation practices, and the use of human waste as manure, focusing on factors that increase infection risk. Additional questions explored exposure to water bodies, potential SCH transmission sources, and hygiene behaviors like handwashing and water treatment. Participants were also asked about infection transmission, symptoms, and their attitudes toward STH and SCH.

The questionnaire was initially developed in English and translated into Kinyarwanda, the local language, by bilingual team members. It was reviewed by other fluent researchers to ensure linguistic accuracy and cultural relevance, then digitized using an Open Data Kit (ODK)-based system for administration on smartphones. Pre-testing was conducted in two districts to validate its content and ensure consistency in data collection.

Recruitment and data collection procedures

Data collection began with village leaders and community health workers contacting participants from randomly selected households. These local representatives coordinated with health centers to schedule convenient dates and locations for data collection. Upon arrival, participants provided consent and were assigned a card with a unique code. They were then given containers for stool and urine sample collection.

When participants returned with their samples, laboratory technicians verified the samples to ensure that the identifiers matched the participant codes and logged the information into a digital system. If participants were unable to provide a sample immediately, they were encouraged to return it later.

After submitting their samples, participants took part in an interview session. Trained data collectors, who were also nurses, conducted structured interviews in Kinyarwanda using a digital questionnaire. All data were uploaded daily to a central server hosted by the Rwanda Biomedical Centre, following verification by the team leader for questionnaire data and by senior laboratory technicians for laboratory results. All procedures adhered to local data protection regulations.

Laboratory testing and quality assurance

Laboratory testing for STH and SCH followed standardized procedures. For STH, including A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, and hookworm, stool samples from each participant were analyzed using duplicate Kato-Katz slides. These slides were examined under a light microscope, and egg counts were recorded to determine infection intensity. Due to the fragile nature of hookworm eggs, which can disintegrate after 40–60 minutes, the slides were initially read within 20 minutes to capture hookworm eggs, with a second reading later for other parasites [36].

For SCH, stool samples were analyzed using the KK technique, while urine samples were tested using the POC-CCA test and dipsticks for haematuria. The POC-CCA is a rapid, urine-based assay that detects Schistosoma mansoni antigens and is well suited for field use due to its ease of administration and high sensitivity, particularly for low-intensity infections. One drop of urine was applied to the test cassette, followed by a drop of buffer solution; results were read after 20 minutes and scored as negative, trace, or positive (1+ to 3+), based on band intensity. In cases where haematuria was detected by dipstick, additional urine testing was conducted using centrifugation and microscopic examination to assess for S. haematobium infection antigens [1012].

To ensure accuracy and quality in laboratory testing, for microscopy, a refresher training was conducted by the senior technician form the National Reference Laboratory (NRL) for qualified laboratory technicians experienced in KK techniques and microscopy from health facilities. Positive slides with SCH and STH species and bench aids with image of parasites ‘eggs were used during the training. During field activities, two laboratory technicians read duplicate slides (one read A another read B). A qualified quality controller (a senior technician from NRL or referral hospital) in each team conducted quality control of 20% randomly selected slides (+/- 12 slides). Any discrepancies exceeding 10% (in terms of the type or number of eggs) between the senior technician’s readings and those of the field microscopists were required to be reported to the survey coordinator; however, no discrepancies >10% identified.

For POC-CCA tests, intra-reader reliability checks were implemented. After the initial reading, a quality controller and two additional technicians re-read 10% of the CCA cassettes results on daily basis. Results were compared, and discrepancies over 10% but less than 20% were discussed to reach consensus. Larger discrepancies (over 20%) triggered external review and refresher training.

Bias and mitigation measures

To minimize potential biases, the study implemented several strategies. Ten data collection teams, each consisting of lab technicians, nurses, and quality controllers, were supported by local health staff, with field team leaders ensuring standardized procedures across all locations. A five-day training workshop and pre-test in two districts refined logistics, validated tools, and ensured consistency in data collection. Selection bias was addressed by recruiting participants from randomly selected households, coordinated by community leaders to ensure diversity. Reporting bias was minimized through structured interviews conducted by trained nurses using a clear questionnaire, reducing ambiguity and recall errors.

Sample handling bias was prevented by assigning unique codes to participants for accurate tracking of stool and urine samples, with staff verifying identifiers. Standardized procedures, including duplicate KK slides and specific timing for hookworm readings, helped reduce measurement bias. Quality assurance measures, such as daily checks by team leaders and senior laboratory technicians and intra-reader reliability checks, ensured consistent testing. Data was recorded by aids of an Open Data Kit (ODK)-based system, with daily uploads to a central server for regular quality checks, review, and cleaning, maintaining data accuracy and completeness.

Study size

The sample size determination followed the WHO protocol for mapping neglected tropical diseases amenable to preventive chemotherapy in the African region, which recommends sampling 50 participants per village and at least five villages in each ecological zone [37]. In this study, villages the smallest administrative units in Rwanda, each with about 150–200 households served as the survey areas. The survey covered all 30 districts, with five sectors selected per district, resulting in 150 sectors. Within each sector, two villages were chosen, resulting in a total of 10 villages per district, totaling 300 villages. In each village, 60 participants were selected, aiming for 600 participants per district and a nationwide total of 18,000 participants.

Sampling process

A three-stage sampling design was used to select study villages, focusing on areas likely to support schistosomiasis transmission due to their proximity to water bodies or wetlands.

Stage 1: Determination of eligible villages: In the first stage, villages adjacent to water bodies or wetlands were identified, given the focal transmission patterns of schistosomiasis, which typically occur in such environments. The sampling process was informed by both known and suspected transmission areas, utilizing available epidemiological data as stipulated by the WHO, which recommends purposive sampling considering sub-districts instead of random sampling due to the high focality of schistosomiasis transmission [37]. Geographic Information System (GIS) software and data from the Rwanda Environment Management Authority (REMA) and the Ministry of Environment/Water Department were used to identify 6,165 villages located near significant water bodies or wetlands. Villages were excluded if they were near very small wetlands (less than 1 hectare) or isolated wetlands, assuming that these do not retain sufficient water throughout the year to support transmission. Villages located in wetlands permanently converted to agricultural use, such as tea plantations or other cash crops were also excluded. This determination was made using data from the Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources (MINAGRI), the National Agricultural Export Development Board (NAEB), and cross-referenced with satellite imagery from Google Earth [38,39]. Additionally, villages within protected areas, such as national parks, natural forests, and RAMSAR sites, were excluded from the sampling.

Stage 2: Selection of villages: During the second stage, villages at high risk of schistosomiasis transmission were identified based on ecological and epidemiological factors. Data were collected from all eligible villages through structured phone interviews with local officials, such as sector agriculture officers and village leaders, who provided extensive local knowledge. The data collection utilized an adapted WHO form designed to improve the use of available prevalence data and support subdistrict-level planning for schistosomiasis control [40]. The collected data were used to rank the villages by risk level, with the criteria presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Grading criteria for villages to determine their risk for schistosomes.

Factor Condition Grade
Type of water body Villages adjacent to lakes, water dams, ponds, fishponds, marshes, or wetlands 2
Villages near rivers or water streams 1
Villages near torrents or surfaces with non-permanent water 0
Type of human activity Swimming, fishing, rice cultivation, water fetching, irrigation, livestock watering 2
Cultivation of other crops or vegetation, other activities 1
No water-related activities 0
Estimated number of population exposed More than 100 individuals exposed 2
1-100 individuals exposed 1
No individuals exposed 0
Proximity of households to water bodies Households located less than 500 meters from a water body 2
Households located more than 500 meters from a water body 1
No adjacent water body 0
Confirmed cases of schistosomiasis Confirmed cases by survey or routine reporting 1
No confirmed cases 0

Villages that scored high were considered high risk. A total of 3,100 villages were ranked as high risk according to these factors. The high-risk villages were grouped by district and sector. Within each district, five sectors were selected. From each selected sector, two villages were chosen from the pool of high-risk villages, resulting in a total of 10 villages per district and 300 villages nationwide (Fig 1). The selection process was conducted visually, considering the spatial distribution and ecosystem characteristics of the high-risk villages to ensure that the selected sectors and villages were well-distributed across each district, capturing the ecological and geographical variations within the districts.

Fig 1. Selected villages across districts highlighted in red.

Fig 1

The base layer consists of shapefiles provided by the National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda and publicly available through the Africa GeoPortal, powered by Esri: https://rwanda.africageoportal.com/search?q=rwanda.

Stage 3: Selection of households and study participants: For each selected village, health centers conducted a census of all households, recording the name, sex, and age of every individual. Households with members representing all three age groups (1 – 4 years, 5–15 years, and 16 + years) were included in the sampling frame. Systematic sampling was used to select 20 households per village to ensure 60 participants per village. The sampling interval was calculated by dividing the total number of households by the number to be selected. The first household was chosen randomly within this interval, and subsequent households were selected systematically, resulting in a total of 6,000 households across all villages.

Within each of the 20 selected households per village, participants were chosen using simple random sampling to ensure representation across the three age groups. In the first household, one individual from each age group was randomly selected. If there were multiple individuals in an age group, names were written on pieces of paper, mixed, and one name was drawn at random. For subsequent households, participants were selected with consideration to balance the number of males and females per age group in each village [34]. Individuals with mental disabilities preventing them from responding to the survey questions were excluded from the study.

Consideration for STH: It was assumed that STH transmission is relatively homogeneous within districts or subdistricts, based on previous national mapping efforts that did not reveal clear or consistent variation at finer geographic scales [8,9,20,41]. Consequently, the villages and participants selected for SCH were also considered suitable for assessing STH. This approach was deemed appropriate given the large sample size, broad geographic coverage of the selected villages, and the need for operational efficiency. Therefore, no additional sampling was conducted specifically for STH.

Statistical methods

Data were downloaded in Excel format and subsequently exported to R for cleaning and analysis. All data cleaning and analysis were conducted using R version 4.4.1. The dataset was stored on a password-protected computer, ensuring secure access. Only the research team had access to the data. All identifiable information was removed to maintain confidentiality and protect participant privacy.

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Frequencies and percentages were calculated to describe the study population and the prevalence of SCH and STH infections overall and by species. Infection intensity for SCH and STH was categorized as light, moderate, or heavy according to WHO guidelines, based on EPG values [34,35]. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to adjust prevalence estimates for age; the methods and results of the age-adjusted analysis are presented in S1 Text.

To explore associations between independent variables and outcomes, chi-square tests were conducted to identify variables significantly associated with each outcome at a significance level of p < 0.05. Variables with p-values <0.05 in bivariate analyses and additional covariates identified from the literature were included in the multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models with districts as random intercepts to determine risk factors for STH and SCH in separate models. The STH model was adjusted for age category, marital status, education level, main occupation, toilet facility type, soap and water availability, main water source, water treatment behavior, use of human excreta as fertilizer, and proximity to marshlands (for rice and other uses). The SCH model was adjusted for age category, marital status, education level, main occupation, main water source, time to water source, use of human excreta as fertilizer, proximity to various water bodies (lake, river, pond/dam, marshlands, other), and walk time to the nearest water body. To avoid multicollinearity, correlations between variables were tested beforehand, ensuring only non-correlated variables were included. The significance level for the models was set at p < 0.05. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p-values were reported for each variable included in the final models.

Comparison of STH and S. mansoni prevalence, 2008–2020.

To assess changes in prevalence across surveys, we focused on SAC, as previous surveys were conducted in this age group: 10–16 years in schools in 2008, 9–18 years in schools in 2014, and 5–15 years in the community in 2020. Historical prevalence data and the number of individuals tested for each parasite species in 2008 and 2014 were obtained from national program survey reports and related publications [9,41]. For each infection, absolute differences in prevalence between survey years (2008–2014 and 2014–2020) were calculated, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). CIs were estimated using the standard error of the difference between two survey proportions, based on the standard normal approximation (Wald method), which assumes independent samples and sufficiently large sample sizes. For S. mansoni, results from KK and POC-CCA tests were presented separately. For the POC-CCA, trace results were considered positive in both the 2014 and 2020 datasets; the 2008 survey did not include the POC-CCA test. No S. haematobium infections were detected in any of the survey years. All results are reported as percentage point differences. Details of the estimates from previous surveys for each STH and SCH are available in the S4 Table.

Knowledge and attitudes assessment.

A structured knowledge and attitudes module was included to assess community awareness and perceptions of SCH and STH among participants aged 10 years and above, who were able to respond to knowledge-related questions. Participants were first asked if they had heard of either condition. Those who responded “yes” were asked about sources of information (e.g., churches, community health workers, health facilities, media, schools, parents/elders, or other), time since last receiving information, knowledge of transmission, and awareness of treatment.

Knowledge of transmission was defined as correctly identifying key pathways contact with contaminated water for SCH, and poor hygiene, open defecation, or unsafe food or water for STH. Treatment awareness was based on identifying albendazole, mebendazole, or similar deworming medications.

Attitudes were assessed using Likert-scale questions. Responses of “agree” or “strongly agree” were coded as “Agree,” while all others were classified as “Disagree.” For SCH, attitude items covered perceived severity, importance of screening, treatment uptake, and care-seeking for symptoms. For STH, they included beliefs about preventability, use of untreated human excreta as fertilizer, and traditional medicine.

Responses were stratified by age group school-aged children (SAC: 10–15 years) and adults (≥16 years) and summarized as frequencies and percentages. “No” responses and missing data were excluded from the denominator for each indicator.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics

The study included 17,765 participants across five provinces: East (n = 4,115; 23.2%), Kigali City (n = 1,768; 10.0%), North (n = 2,981; 16.8%), South (n = 4,750; 26.7%), and West (n = 4,151; 23.4%). The sample comprised 9,582 (53.9%) females and 8,183 (46.1%) males. Participants were categorized as preschool-aged children (1–4 years; n = 5,573, 31.4%), school-aged children (5–15 years; n = 6,166, 34.7%), and adults (≥16 years; n = 6,026, 33.9%).

Of the 8,559 participants reporting marital status, 56.7% were married, 36.8% were single, and 6.5% were divorced, separated, or widowed. Among 8,563 respondents, 54% had no formal education, 41.9% had primary education, and 4.1% had secondary or higher education. Most (58.4%) of 8,564 participants who reported their main occupation were engaged in agriculture or farming, while 31.3% were students.

At the household level, 87.4% of the 4,906 surveyed households had a toilet facility with a depth of at least 3 meters, and 57.8% of the 4,841 respondents reported always having soap and water available. In terms of water treatment practices, 45% of respondents indicated they never treated water before drinking, with boiling being the most common method (92.9%) among those who did treat their water. Regarding the use of human excreta as manure, 73.1% of households did not use these, while 22% reported treating them before use.

About proximity to water bodies, 53.3% of households were located near a river, and 64.3% were near marshlands used for activities other than rice farming. Detailed sociodemographic characteristics can be found in Table 2.

Table 2. Individuals’ and households’ sociodemographic characteristics.

Variables Categories n %
Individual social demographics
Province (N = 17765) East 4115 23.2
Kigali City 1768 10
North 2981 16.8
South 4750 26.7
West 4151 23.4
Sex of the participant (N = 17765) Female 9582 53.9
Male 8183 46.1
Age categories (N = 17765) pre-SAC (1–4) 5573 31.4
SAC (5–15) 6166 34.7
Adults (16 and above) 6026 33.9
Marital status (N = 8559) Single 3151 36.8
Married 4850 56.7
Divorced/Separated/Widowed 558 6.5
Education level (N = 8563) No education 4624 54
Primary 3591 41.9
Vocational or literacy training 15 0.2
Secondary and higher 333 3.9
Main occupation (N = 8564) Agriculture/Farmer 5002 58.4
Employed (formal/informal) 399 4.7
Self-employed/Retired 135 1.6
Student 2682 31.3
Unemployed/Other 346 4
Household-level variables
Has toilet facility (N = 4906) No 65 1.3
Yes, < 3 meters deep 555 11.3
Yes, 3 + meters deep 4286 87.4
Always have soap and water (N = 4841) * No 2045 42.2
Yes 2796 57.8
Main water source (N = 4906) Improved source 1933 39.4
Non-improved source 2973 60.6
Treat water before drinking (N = 4906) Never 2210 45
Yes, sometimes 1108 22.6
Yes, always 1588 32.4
Main water treatment methods (among those who always treat water) (N = 1588) Boiling 1475 92.9
Chemical 34 2.1
Filtering 62 3.9
Others 17 1.1
Time to closest water source (round trip) (N = 3143) * On premises or <30 min 1690 53.8
30 - 60 min 884 28.1
More than 1 hour 569 18.1
Use human excreta as fertilizer (N = 4841) * No 3539 73.1
Yes, and treat the fertilizer used 1066 22
Yes, does not treat fertilizer used 236 4.9
Nearest water bodies (N = 4906)
(Participants could have more than one type.)
Lake 1202 24.5
River 2616 53.3
Pond/Dam 1165 23.7
Marshlands for rice farming 1070 21.8
Marshlands for other activities 3153 64.3
Other water bodies 222 4.5
Walk time to closest water bodies (N = 4906) 0-20 min 2871 58.5
21-40 min 1387 28.3
41 + min 648 13.2

* There were missing values for some participants.

The prevalence and intensity of STH and S. mansoni

Table 3 shows the variation in the prevalence of STH and S. mansoni across different age groups. The overall prevalence of any STH infection was 38.7% (95% CI: 37.9–39.4), with the highest prevalence observed among adults (46.1%, 95% CI: 44.8–47.3) and the lowest among pre-SAC (30.2%, 95% CI: 29.0–31.5). The prevalence of A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, and hookworm was 27.0%, 11.6%, and 10.7%, respectively. SAC exhibited the highest prevalence of A. lumbricoides (30.5%, 95% CI: 29.4–31.7) and T. trichiura (15.0%, 95% CI: 14.1–15.9), while adults had the highest estimated prevalence of hookworm (21.3%, 95% CI: 20.2–22.3).

Table 3. Prevalence of STH and S. mansoni.

Species Overall pre-SAC (1–4 years) SAC (5–15 years) Adults (16 and above)
% 95% CI Tested % 95% CI Tested % 95% CI Tested % 95% CI Tested
Soil-Transmitted Helminths
Any STH 38.7 [37.9 - 39.4] 17360 30.2 [29 - 31.5] 5309 38.8 [37.6 - 40.1] 6104 46.1 [44.8 - 47.3] 5947
A. lumbricoides 27 [26.3 - 27.6] 17348 24.5 [23.3 - 25.6] 5307 30.5 [29.4 - 31.7] 6098 25.6 [24.5 - 26.7] 5943
Hookworm 10.7 [10.3 - 11.2] 17338 4.3 [3.8 - 4.9] 5303 6.1 [5.5 - 6.7] 6096 21.3 [20.2 - 22.3] 5939
T. trichiura 11.6 [11.2 - 12.1] 17352 8.4 [7.7 - 9.2] 5308 15.0 [14.1 - 15.9] 6101 11.0 [10.3 - 11.9] 5943
Schistosoma mansoni
S. mansoni (KK) 1.7 [1.5 - 1.9] 17342 0.6 [0.4 - 0.9] 5304 2.4 [2 - 2.8] 6100 1.8 [1.5 - 2.2] 5938
S. mansoni (CCA - Trace positive) 27.0 [26.3 - 27.7] 17645 35.6 [34.4 - 36.9] 5485 25.6 [24.5 - 26.7] 6151 20.5 [19.5 - 21.6] 6009
S. mansoni (KK or POC-CCA - Trace positive) 27.2 [26.5 - 27.9] 17719 35.4 [34.1 - 36.7] 5542 25.9 [24.8 - 27] 6159 20.9 [19.9 - 22] 6018
S. mansoni (POC-CCA - Trace negative) 10.9 [10.5 - 11.4] 17645 15.5 [14.6 - 16.5] 5485 10.1 [9.3 - 10.9] 6151 7.6 [6.9 - 8.3] 6009
S. mansoni (KK or POC-CCA - Trace negative) 11.4 [11 - 11.9] 17719 15.6 [14.7 - 16.6] 5542 10.7 [9.9 - 11.5] 6159 8.3 [7.6 - 9] 6018

The overall prevalence of S. mansoni using the KK method was 1.7% (95% CI: 1.5–1.9). When including positives identified by either KK or POC-CCA (with trace results considered positive), the prevalence increased to 27.2% (95% CI: 26.5–27.9), with the highest prevalence observed among pre-SAC (35.4%, 95% CI: 34.1–36.7). No Schistosoma haematobium was detected in any tests. Adjusted prevalence estimates for STH and S. mansoni are provided in S1 Text.

Table 4 presents the intensity of infections with STH and S. mansoni. Heavy infections were rare, with A. lumbricoides highest at 0.5% (95% CI: 0.4–0.7), followed by Hookworm at 0.1% (95%CI: 0 - 0.1]) and T. trichiura at 0.02% (95% CI: 0.0–0.1), and S. mansoni at 0.1% (95% CI: 0.0–0.1). Moderate infections were highest for A. lumbricoides at 7.5% (95% CI: 7.1–7.9), while light infections dominated, with A. lumbricoides at 18.9% (95% CI: 18.3–19.5), T. trichiura at 10.9% (95% CI: 10.4–11.3), and Hookworm at 10.6% (95% CI: 10.1–11.1). Combined moderate and heavy infections were highest for A. lumbricoides at 8.1% (95% CI: 7.7–8.5).

Table 4. Intensity of STH and S. mansoni.

Species Light Moderate Heavy Moderate & Heavy Mean* EPG 95% CI
mean EPG
n % 95% CI n % 95% CI n % 95% CI n % 95% CI
A. lumbricoides 3283 18.9 [18.3 - 19.5] 1302 7.5 [7.1 - 7.9] 95 0.5 [0.4 - 0.7] 1397 8.1 [7.7 - 8.5] 6589.1 [6203.1 - 6975.2]
Hookworm 1836 10.6 [10.1 - 11.1] 13 0.1 [0 - 0.1] 11 0.1 [0 - 0.1] 24 0.1 [0.1 - 0.2] 210.4 [167.1 - 253.8]
T. trichiura 1885 10.9 [10.4 - 11.3] 129 0.7 [0.6 - 0.9] 4 0.02 [0 - 0.1] 133 0.8 [0.6 - 0.9] 324.1 [283.8 - 364.5]
S. mansoni - KK 225 1.3 [1.1 - 1.5] 54 0.3 [0.2 - 0.4] 9 0.1 [0 - 0.1] 63 0.4 [0.3 - 0.5] 92.2 [74.3 - 110]

* The mean number of eggs per gram (EPG) of feces was calculated among individuals who tested positive.

Fig 2 presents the site-specific geographical distribution of prevalence for A. lumbricoides, Hookworm, and T. trichiura across Rwanda. For A. lumbricoides, higher prevalence clusters are observed in localized areas, particularly in the northern and southern regions. Hookworm prevalence is generally lower across the country, with most areas showing prevalence levels below 10% and only a few regions reaching 20–29.9%. T. trichiura exhibits a similar pattern to A. lumbricoides, with high prevalence areas (≥50%) concentrated in the northern regions, although many regions have prevalence levels below 10%. Additionally, regarding progress toward the elimination of STH as a public health problem, a detailed analysis showed that in 2020, fourteen districts had villages with an MHI prevalence of ≥2% for at least one STH species among SAC.

Fig 2. Site-specific geographical distribution of STH prevalence across Rwanda.

Fig 2

The base layer consists of shapefiles provided by the National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda and publicly available through the Africa GeoPortal, powered by Esri: https://rwanda.africageoportal.com/search?q=rwanda.

Fig 3 shows the geographical distribution of S. mansoni prevalence. Using the KK method, most sites had low prevalence levels (<10%), with a few showing higher prevalence (10–49.9%) and none exceeding 50%. In contrast, the combined diagnostic approach (KK or POC-CCA) revealed significantly higher prevalence, with many sites reporting levels of 10–49.9% and several exceeding 50% across the country. Regarding progress toward the elimination of SCH as a public health problem, a detailed analysis showed that in 2020, six districts had test sites with ≥1% heavy infection for SCH.

Fig 3. Geographical distribution of S. mansoni prevalence in Rwanda (KK and POC-CCA, traces considered as positive) The base layer consists of shapefiles provided by the National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda and publicly available through the Africa GeoPortal, powered by Esri: https://rwanda.africageoportal.com/search?q=rwanda.

Fig 3

Notes: District-level mapping was not performed for S. mansoni as it would imply uniform prevalence and treatment eligibility across entire districts. Given the focal nature of transmission and the use of cells as the implementation unit in Rwanda, site-level data provide more actionable information for targeted intervention.

Fig 4 highlights the overall prevalence of STH by district. Prevalence varied significantly across districts, with seven districts reporting a prevalence of any STH ≥ 50%. The highest prevalence was observed in Rubavu (85.1%), followed by Rutsiro (71.0%) and Nyabihu (69.5%). The lowest prevalence of any STH was reported in Kicukiro (8.6%) and Gasabo (15.3%), both located in Kigali City. Detailed district-level prevalence and intensity data for each species are provided in S1 Table.

Fig 4. Prevalence of any STH by district for all populations combined.

Fig 4

Numbers on the map represent district-level prevalence for any STH. The base layer consists of shapefiles provided by the National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda and publicly available through the Africa GeoPortal, powered by Esri: https://rwanda.africageoportal.com/search?q=rwanda.

Prevalence of any STH and S. mansoni by individual and household sociodemographic characteristics

Table 5 presents the prevalence of STH and S. mansoni (positive on either KK or POC-CCA) by individual and household sociodemographic characteristics. The prevalence of any STH varied by province, with higher rates in the West (58.5%) and lower rates in Kigali City (13.5%) (p < 0.001). Adults had a higher STH prevalence (46.1%) compared to pre-SAC at 30.2% and SAC at 38.8% (p < 0.001). The prevalence was also higher among divorced, separated, or widowed individuals (51.8%, p < 0.001). Individuals aged 10 years and above without formal education had the highest prevalence of STH (50.1%, p < 0.001). Individuals engaged in agriculture/farming had higher rates of infection (48.4%), as well as those who reported being employed (formal/informal) (48.3%), compared to other occupational groups (p < 0.001).

Table 5. Prevalence of any STH and any S. mansoni (positive on either KK or POC-CCA) by individual and household sociodemographic characteristics.

Variables Categories Any STH S. mansoni
(KK or POC-CCA - Trace positive)
n (%) Total (N) P value n (%) Total (N) P value
Social demographics
Province East 908 (22.3) 4068
1227 (29.9) 4109 <0.001
Kigali City 223 (13.5) 1649 520 (29.6) 1757
North 1375 (46.9) 2933 748 (25.1) 2976
South 1826 (39.3) 4645 1195 (25.2) 4733
West 2380 (58.5) 4065 1129 (27.2) 4144
Sex of the participant Female 3655 (39.1) 9352 0.2265 2505 (26.2) 9553 0.0017
Male 3057 (38.2) 8008 2314 (28.3) 8166
Age categories Adults (16+) 2739 (46.1) 5947 <0.001 1260 (20.9) 6018 <0.001
pre-SAC (1 - 4) 1603 (30.2) 5309 1962 (35.4) 5542
SAC (5 - 15) 2370 (38.8) 6104 1597 (25.9) 6159
Marital status Single 1280 (41) 3122 <0.001 824 (26.2) 3143 <0.001
Married 2164 (45.2) 4790 977 (20.2) 4847
Divorced/Separated/Widowed 284 (51.8) 548 108 (19.4) 557
Education level No education 2300 (50.1) 4589 <0.001 1068 (23.1) 4619 0.3151
Primary 1358 (38.4) 3538 767 (21.4) 3585
Vocational or Literacy training 5 (33.3) 15 3 (20) 15
Secondary and Higher 67 (20.8) 322 73 (22) 332
Main occupation Agriculture/Farmer 2398 (48.4) 4959 <0.001 1019 (20.4) 4999 <0.001
Employed (formal/informal) 188 (48.3) 389 86 (21.7) 397
Self Employed/Retired 30 (23.6) 127 38 (28.1) 135
Student 1044 (39.3) 2659 695 (26) 2677
Unemployed/Other 70 (21.1) 331 73 (21.2) 344
Household-level variables
Has toilet facility No 39 (61.9) 63 <0.001 15 (23.1) 65 0.7708
Yes, < 3 meters deep 342 (62) 552 107 (19.3) 554
Yes, 3+ meters deep 1894 (44.7) 4234 846 (19.8) 4281
Always have soap and water No 1046 (51.5) 2033 <0.001 426 (20.9) 2042 0.0921
Yes 1190 (43.2) 2753 527 (18.9) 2793
Main water source Improved source 781 (41.2) 1897 <0.001 384 (19.9) 1929 0.8587
Non-improved source 1494 (50.6) 2952 584 (19.7) 2971
Water treatment before drinking Never 1129 (51.5) 2192 <0.001 426 (19.3) 2208 0.6443
Sometimes 527 (47.7) 1104 229 (20.7) 1108
Yes, always 619 (39.9) 1553 313 (19.8) 1584
Water treatment method (among those who always treat water) Boiling 584 (40.4) 1444 0.3334 296 (20.1) 1471 0.6165
Chemical 9 (27.3) 33 5 (14.7) 34
Filtering, 21 (34.4) 61 9 (14.5) 62
Others 5 (33.3) 15 3 (17.6) 17
Time to closest water source (round trip) 30 - 60 min 448 (51.1) 876 0.0663 162 (18.3) 884 0.3679
More than 1 hour 310 (55.1) 563 112 (19.7) 568
On premises or <30 min 830 (49.4) 1680 349 (20.7) 1689
Use human excreta as fertilizer and treat it No 1516 (43.5) 3486 <0.001 662 (18.7) 3533 0.0083
Yes, & treat the fertilizer used 597 (56.1) 1064 231 (21.7) 1066
Yes, does not treat fertilizer 123 (52.1) 236 60 (25.4) 236
Nearest water bodies (N=4906) (Participants could have more than one type.) Lake No 1709 (46.8) 3652 0.7944 663 (17.9) 3699 <0.001
Yes 566 (47.3) 1197 305 (25.4) 1201
River No 922 (40.9) 2253 <0.001 482 (21.1) 2286 0.0315
Yes 1353 (52.1) 2596 486 (18.6) 2614
Pond/Dam No 1729 (46.8) 3697 0.7344 716 (19.2) 3735 0.0719
Yes 546 (47.4) 1152 252 (21.6) 1165
Marshlands for rice farming No 1809 (47.8) 3788 0.0294 728 (19) 3832 0.0132
Yes 466 (43.9) 1061 240 (22.5) 1068
Marshlands for other No 765 (44.1) 1733 0.0042 378 (21.6) 1750 0.0173
Yes 1510 (48.5) 3116 590 (18.7) 3150
Other water bodies No 2181 (47.1) 4631 0.2800 931 (19.9) 4679 0.2869
Yes 94 (43.1) 218 37 (16.7) 221
Walk time to closest water bodies 0-20 min 1335 (47) 2841 0.2444 562 (19.6) 2868 0.9454
21-40 min 656 (48.1) 1364 277 (20) 1385
41+ min 284 (44.1) 644 129 (19.9) 647

At the household level, STH prevalence was higher in homes lacking proper toilet facilities (61.9%) or with toilets less than 3 meters deep (62%) (p < 0.001), as well as in households where soap and water were not consistently available (51.5%, p < 0.001). Additionally, households relying on non-improved water sources or not treating water before drinking exhibited higher STH prevalence (50.6% and 51.5%, respectively, p < 0.001).

For S. mansoni, in addition to higher prevalence among pre-SAC (35.4%) and lower among adults (20.9%) (p < 0.001), differences were also seen by sex, with males showing higher prevalence (28.3%) compared to females (26.2%) (p = 0.0017). Geographical factors played a role; prevalence was higher among those living near lakes (25.4%, p < 0.001) and near rivers (18.6%, p = 0.0315). Additionally, proximity to marshlands used for rice farming was associated with a higher prevalence (22.5%, p = 0.0132).

Details on prevalence and intensity of Hookworm, A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, and S. mansoni (KK, POC-CCA Trace Positive/Negative) by sociodemographic characteristics are presented in S2 Table. Univariate regression results, including odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and Chi-square test statistics, are presented in S3 Table.

Change in prevalence of STH and S. mansoni from 2008 to 2020

Fig 5 shows changes in infection prevalence across surveys from 2008, 2014, and 2020. The prevalence of any STH declined significantly by 20.8% points from 2008 to 2014 (95% CI: -22.2, -19.4) and by 6.2 points from 2014 to 2020 (95% CI: -7.8, -4.6). A. lumbricoides prevalence fell by 1.6 points between 2008 and 2014 (95% CI: -3.0, -0.2) and by 6.5 percentage points from 2014 to 2020 (95% CI: -8.0, -5.0). Hookworm dropped sharply by 26.6 percentage points from 2008 to 2014 (95% CI: -27.7, -25.5) but slightly increased by 1.1 percentage points from 2014 to 2020, T. trichiura prevalence declined by 4 points from 2008 to 2014 (95% CI: -5.3, -2.7) and by 8 points from 2014 to 2020 (95% CI: -9.2, -6.8). S. mansoni prevalence using the CCA method (trace positive) dropped by 10.5 points from 2014 to 2020 (95% CI: -12.0, -9.0). Details of the estimates from previous surveys for each STH and SCH are available in the S4 Table.

Fig 5. Comparison of SCH and STH survey prevalence among SAC across mapping years.

Fig 5

Estimates represent absolute differences in prevalence between surveys with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Data include SAC aged 10–16 years in 2008, 9–18 years in 2014, and 5–15 years in 2020.

Fig 6 shows the spatial distribution of STH endemicity in Rwanda in 2008, 2014, and 2020 among SAC. In 2008, 23 out of 30 districts (76.7%) had high STH prevalence (≥50%), with only 2 districts (6.7%) showing prevalence <20%. By 2014, high-prevalence districts decreased to 12 (40%). In 2020, high-prevalence districts further dropped to 10 (33.3%). Additionally, regarding the progress toward their elimination as the public health problem, fourteen of the 30 districts had an MHI prevalence of ≥2% for at least one STH species among SAC.

Fig 6. Trends in STH endemicity among SAC across Rwandan districts (2008–2020).

Fig 6

Data include SAC aged 10–16 years in 2008, 9–18 years in 2014, and 5–15 years in 2020. The base layer consists of shapefiles provided by the National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda and publicly available through the Africa GeoPortal, powered by Esri: https://rwanda.africageoportal.com/search?q=rwanda.

However, some districts experienced an increase in prevalence. Two districts (Kayonza and Ruhango), which had prevalence <20% in earlier years, shifted to the category of prevalence between ≥20% and <50% by 2020. Additionally, one district (Rulindo) showed an increase, shifting from prevalence between ≥20% and <50% to ≥50% in 2020 (Fig 6).

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices about STH and SCH

Table 6 summarizes sources of information, knowledge, and attitudes about STH and SCH among SAC and adults. Knowledge was high, with 90.6% of SAC and 96.6% of adults aware of correct transmission modes, and over 90% understanding proper treatment. However, 25% believed prevention was impossible, and 12.7% found using untreated human waste as fertilizer acceptable. For STH, SAC mainly received information from schools (69.1%), while adults relied on health facilities (54.1%) and media (32.9%).

Table 6. Source of information, knowledge, and attitudes about SCH and STH.

Variables Categories About SCH About STH
SAC**
(N = 152)
Adults
(N = 1382)
Total
(N = 1534)
SAC**
(N = 1471)
Adults
(N = 4791)
Total
(N = 6262)
n (%) n (%)
Source of information Churches 1 (0.7) 6 (0.4) 7 (0.5) 9 (0.6) 41 (0.9) 50 (0.8)
Community Health Workers 36 (23.7) 471 (34.1) 507 (33.1)
Health facility 44 (28.9) 531 (38.4) 575 (37.5) 369 (25.1) 2594 (54.1) 2963 (47.3)
Media 46 (30.3) 631 (45.7) 677 (44.1) 260 (17.7) 1575 (32.9) 1835 (29.3)
School 56 (36.8) 88 (6.4) 144 (9.4) 1017 (69.1) 364 (7.6) 1381 (22.1)
Old parents 20 (13.2) 67 (4.8) 87 (5.7) 319 (21.7) 324 (6.8) 643 (10.3)
Other 4 (2.6) 29 (2.1) 33 (2.2) 12 (0.8) 93 (1.9) 105 (1.7)
When last received STH information 1 year or less 61 (40.1) 439 (31.8) 500 (32.6)
> 1 year 91 (59.9) 943 (68.2) 1034 (67.4)
Knows correct transmission mode 80 (52.6) 692 (50.1) 772 (50.3) 1333 (90.6) 4630 (96.6) 5963 (95.2)
Know correct treatment * 1344 (91.4) 4549 (94.9) 5893 (94.1)
Participant agreed that: SCH is a mild disease. 70 (46.1) 493 (35.7) 563 (36.7) *
Regular screening for SCH is important. 134 (88.2) 1296 (93.8) 1430 (93.2) *
Taking SCH medication is important. 136 (89.5) 1290 (93.3) 1426 (93)
Seeking care for symptoms like blood in stool or abdominal pain is necessary. 143 (94.1) 1358 (98.3) 1501 (97.8) *
Intestinal worms cannot be prevented. * 363 (24.7) 1205 (25.2) 1568 (25)
Using untreated human waste as fertilizer is acceptable. * 181 (12.3) 614 (12.8) 795 (12.7)
Herbs are more effective than modern medicine for treating intestinal worms. * 213 (14.5) 486 (10.1) 699 (11.2)

* Not assessed for this condition

** SAC were children aged 10–15 years, the age group able to answer knowledge questions.

The knowledge about SCH transmission was lower, with 52.6% of SAC and 50.1% of adults aware of the correct transmission modes. SAC primarily learned from schools (36.8%) and media (30.3%), while adults accessed information from media (45.7%) and health facilities (38.4%). Still, there was strong support for regular screening (93.2%) and medication (93%), though 36.7% viewed SCH as a mild disease.

Risk factors for any STH and SCH: results from Mixed-Effect Logistic Regression Models

Table 7 shows the results from mixed effect logistic regression models identifying factors associated with STH and S. mansoni (SCH) infections, adjusted for other variables and accounting for variations among districts.

Table 7. Results from the mixed effect logistic regression for the factors associated with having any STH, and the factor associated with S. mansoni.

Variables Categories Any STH S. mansoni
(KK or POC-CCA - Trace positive)
AOR 95% CI P-value AOR 95% CI P-value
Age categories Adults (16+) Ref Ref
SAC (5–15) 1.3 (0.53 - 3.16) 0.565 1.79 (0.61 - 5.24) 0.285
Marital status Married Ref Ref
Single 1.74 (1.32 - 2.28) <0.001* 1.61 (1.11 - 2.33) 0.011*
Divorced/Separated/Widowed 1.42 (1.16 - 1.74) 0.001* 0.83 (0.6 - 1.14) 0.251
Education level Primary Ref Ref
No education 1.56 (1.37 - 1.78) <0.001* 1.41 (1.16 - 1.72) 0.001*
Vocational or literacy training 0.68 (0.19 - 2.42) 0.554 1.27 (0.14 - 11.34) 0.830
Secondary and higher 0.55 (0.37 - 0.81) 0.003* 0.8 (0.41 - 1.58) 0.526
Main occupation Agriculture/Farmer Ref Ref
Employed (formal/informal) 1.03 (0.78 - 1.37) 0.829 1.1 (0.73 - 1.65) 0.663
Self Employed/Retired 0.53 (0.31 - 0.91) 0.020* 1.06 (0.48 - 2.37) 0.880
Student 0.54 (0.34 - 0.85) 0.008* 1.26 (0.68 - 2.35) 0.463
Unemployed/Other 0.34 (0.23 - 0.51) <0.001* 0.82 (0.44 - 1.54) 0.540
Has toilet facility Yes, < 3 meters deep Ref
Yes, 3 + meters deep 0.78 (0.64 - 0.96) 0.018*
Always have soap and water No Ref
Yes 0.95 (0.84 - 1.08) 0.460
Main water source Improved source Ref Ref
Non-improved source 1.17 (1.02 - 1.34) 0.024* 0.71 (0.47 - 1.07) 0.099
Treat water before drinking Never Ref
Sometimes 0.84 (0.71 - 0.98) 0.027*
Yes, always 0.79 (0.68 - 0.92) 0.003*
Time to closest water source (round trip) 30 - 60 min Ref
More than 1 hour 1.42 (1.06 - 1.91) 0.019*
On premises or <30 min 1.17 (0.91 - 1.49) 0.215
Use human excreta as fertilizer and treat it No Ref Ref
Yes, and treat the fertilizer used 1.43 (1.22 - 1.66) <0.001* 1.32 (1.06 - 1.65) 0.014*
Yes, does not treat fertilizer used 1.19 (0.9 - 1.59) 0.228 1.6 (1.06 - 2.41) 0.027*
Nearest water bodies Lake No Ref
Yes 1.76 (1.37 - 2.27) <0.001*
River No Ref
Yes 0.89 (0.7 - 1.12) 0.305
Pond/Dam No Ref
Yes 0.96 (0.76 - 1.22) 0.748
Marshlands for rice farming No Ref Ref
Yes 1.02 (0.87 - 1.21) 0.777 1.31 (1 - 1.72) 0.047*
Marshlands for other No Ref Ref
Yes 1.17 (1.02 - 1.35) 0.025* 0.85 (0.68 - 1.07) 0.168
Other water bodies No Ref
Yes 0.98 (0.56 - 1.73) 0.948
Walk time to closest water bodies 0-20 min Ref
21-40 min 1.04 (0.83 - 1.31) 0.728
41 + min 0.9 (0.67 - 1.23) 0.518
Standard deviation for the random intercept (Districts) 0.6 0.73

Model limited to age >=10 years. Empty categories were not included in the model for the specific condition.

* Significant variables (p value <0.05)

Several sociodemographic, environmental, and behavioral factors were associated with STH infection. Single individuals had significantly higher odds of STH infection compared to those who were married (AOR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.32–2.28, p < 0.001). Those with no formal education were more likely to be infected compared to individuals with primary education (AOR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.37–1.78, p < 0.001). Use of treated human excreta as fertilizer was associated with increased odds of STH infection (AOR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.22–1.66, p < 0.001), as was the use of non-improved water sources (AOR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02–1.34, p = 0.024). Additionally, residing near marshlands used for other activities was linked to higher odds of infection (AOR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02–1.35, p = 0.025).

In contrast, several protective factors were identified. Individuals with secondary or higher education had significantly lower odds of infection compared to those with primary education (AOR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.37–0.81, p = 0.003). Unemployed individuals (AOR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23–0.51, p < 0.001) and those who were self-employed or retired (AOR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.31–0.91, p = 0.020) had lower odds of infection compared to those working in agriculture or farming. Households with toilet facilities deeper than three meters had reduced odds of STH infection (AOR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64–0.96, p = 0.018), and consistent treatment of drinking water was also associated with a protective effect (AOR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68–0.92, p = 0.003).

For SCH, single individuals were more likely to be infected compared to those who were married (AOR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.11–2.33, p = 0.011). Participants with no formal education had higher odds of infection than those with primary education (AOR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.16–1.72, p = 0.001). Living more than one hour from a water source was associated with increased odds of SCH infection compared to living 30–60 minutes away (AOR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.06–1.91, p = 0.019). Proximity to lakes was also a significant risk factor (AOR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.37–2.27, p < 0.001).

Use of human excreta as manure—whether untreated (AOR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.06–2.41, p = 0.027) or treated before use (AOR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.06–1.65, p = 0.014)—was linked to higher odds of SCH infection. Similarly, residing near marshlands used for rice farming was associated with increased infection risk (AOR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.00–1.72, p = 0.047).

Discussion

Key results and interpretation

This nationwide survey provides an updated assessment of the prevalence and risk factors for STH and SCH across all age groups in Rwanda. STH prevalence remains high, with adults showing the highest rates and pre-SAC the lowest. Fourteen districts reported an MHI prevalence of ≥2% for at least one STH species among school-aged children, highlighting persistent challenges in achieving the threshold for elimination as a public health problem. Similarly, SCH prevalence remains significant, particularly when assessed using POC-CCA diagnostics, which reveal prevalence exceeding 10% at several sites, necessitating preventive chemotherapy. Despite this, heavy intensity SCH infections remain below 1% across all endemic units, suggesting progress toward elimination targets.

A higher likelihood of STH infection was associated with being single, having no education, using treated human excreta as manure, relying on unimproved water sources, and living near marshlands. Lower likelihoods were observed among those with higher education, unemployed or self-employed/retired individuals, households with deep toilet facilities, and those practicing consistent water treatment. Similarly, SCH infection risk was higher among single individuals, lacked education, lived near lakes or rice-farming marshlands, used untreated or treated human excreta as fertilizer, or resided over an hour from a water source. These results underscore persistent vulnerabilities and highlight areas for targeted interventions to reduce the burden of STH and SCH in Rwanda.

Persistence of high prevalence despite consistent MDA.

Despite multiple rounds of high-coverage MDA, STH prevalence remains substantial in Rwanda. The study took place after 12 years of MDs implementation with 24 MDA rounds (two rounds per year) for STH and 12 rounds for SCH (one round annually) and maintained recommended effective MDA treatment coverage (>75%). This persistence can be attributed to several key factors, including limited access to clean water and sanitation, the exclusion of adults from MDA programs, and the limited efficacy of MDA drugs against certain helminths, particularly T. trichiura.

A major barrier to effective control of STH and SCH is the limited implementation of comprehensive Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) measures to support MDA. Despite Rwanda’s investments in hygiene and sanitation infrastructure, progress has been slow. From 2014 to 2020, the population using improved water sources increased only modestly, from 72.4% to 79.6%, while households with sanitation facilities declined slightly, from 71.2% to 70.2% [13,14]. Additionally, data on the quality, maintenance, and consistent use of WASH facilities remain limited. This stagnation suggests that high MDA coverage in SAC alone may be insufficient to interrupt transmission, especially in communities with inconsistent access to clean water and sanitation [42]. Findings from this study underscore the need for WASH interventions that extend beyond MDA, emphasizing not only the availability of facilities but also their quality, regular maintenance, and reliable usage. Prioritizing these factors is essential for sustained control of STH and SCH transmission. Though requiring substantial investment and stakeholder collaboration, the long-term benefits are likely sustainable and impactful for infection control [43,44].

In addition to WASH and infrastructure gaps, the inclusion of adults in our survey revealed that adults have a higher STH prevalence (46.1%) compared to pre-SAC (30.2%). This finding aligns with studies from Benin, Malawi, Kenya, and India, highlighting those untreated adults may act as reservoirs for reinfection, undermining MDA efforts focused on children [15,16,45,46]. The higher prevalence in adults appears to be driven by elevated hookworm infections in this group and a notable prevalence of A. lumbricoides across all age groups. Historically, MDA in Rwanda has targeted pre-SAC and SAC as they are the most accessible and vulnerable populations. However, excluding adults leaves a substantial portion of the population untreated, enabling infections to persist and reinfect younger populations [4749]. Expanding MDA to include adults could more effectively disrupt transmission and accelerate progress toward eliminating STH and SCH as public health problems [50].

However, including adults in MDA efforts presents logistical and financial challenges. The health benefits of switching to community-wide treatment depend on the STH species and baseline endemicity [51,52]. More importantly, WHO does not currently support drug donations for adult STH treatment in MDA programs, so expansion would require additional funding—a significant cost for the government, given the scale needed [51,53,54]. While advocating for donor support to include adults, a phased approach may be effective, focusing on high-prevalence districts (e.g., ≥ 50% prevalence) where adult treatment could have the greatest impact. Targeting these areas first would help the government optimize resources while addressing the most urgent needs.

In contrast, alongside gaps in MDA coverage, the limited effectiveness of albendazole against T. trichiura remains a major challenge for STH control. Albendazole has demonstrated low cure rates for T. trichiura, whereas combination therapy with ivermectin has shown higher egg reduction and cure rates [55]. Findings from this study, supported by results in S1 and S2 Tables, indicate persistently high STH prevalence in areas with substantial T. trichiura burden, likely due to the limited efficacy of albendazole. These results suggest that implementing combination therapies, such as albendazole with ivermectin, in T. trichiura-endemic areas could enhance MDA effectiveness and accelerate progress toward STH control and elimination targets.

Our study observed a more pronounced decline in hookworm prevalence compared to Ascaris lumbricoides and T. trichiura, likely attributable to albendazole’s higher efficacy against hookworm and concurrent behavioral and environmental improvements. National hygiene initiatives such as mandatory shoe-wearing policies, particularly among school-aged children and reductions in open defecation may have disproportionately disrupted hookworm transmission. Nevertheless, hookworm infection remains more prevalent among adults, likely due to continued exposure through barefoot agricultural activities. These findings underscore the need to expand behavior change interventions beyond school settings to effectively reach adult populations, with targeted messaging promoting consistent footwear use and other protective practices.

[55] We acknowledge that our purposive, risk-based sampling strategy designed to identify high-transmission areas near water bodies may have resulted in higher prevalence estimates than would be obtained through representative sampling. While this targeted approach enhances programmatic relevance by focusing on areas most likely to require intervention, it may also overestimate the true burden of disease at broader geographic levels and thereby underestimate the impact of previous treatment efforts. For example, the SCH prevalence based on KK in this survey was 2.4%, compared to 1.9% reported in the 2014 national mapping. However, this comparison should be interpreted with caution, as the 2014 survey employed school-based sampling with wider geographic coverage and did not specifically target high-risk areas, limiting direct comparability. Importantly, as Rwanda moves toward interruption of transmission, focusing on the highest-risk areas ensures that control efforts are directed where they are most needed, and provides a conservative upper bound for prevalence, offering assurance that transmission levels in lower-risk areas are likely to be even lower.

The POC-CCA test provided a more sensitive measure of S. mansoni prevalence in Rwanda than the KK method, particularly for detecting light and asymptomatic infections in a context of declining transmission due to ongoing mass drug administration. Including trace results raised prevalence to 27.2%, compared to 1.7% with KK, offering a more comprehensive picture of ongoing transmission risks. Although trace results remain debated [10,11], their inclusion aligns with Rwanda’s elimination goals, especially given the availability of praziquantel to support expanded treatment. These findings underscore the value of POC-CCA in low-endemicity settings while highlighting the importance of using both diagnostics during the transition toward elimination, given that current WHO guidelines still rely on KK for assessing elimination as a public health problem.

Factors associated with STH and SCH infection.

Our findings highlight how socioeconomic, occupational, and environmental factors significantly influence the likelihood of STH and SCH infections, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to reduce transmission.

Socioeconomic factors such as being single, education, water source quality, sanitation practices, and employment status emerged as key determinants of infection likelihood, similar to findings in Benin, India, Ghana, and Ethiopia, where lower-income groups face higher infection likelihood [45,46,5658]. The association between being single and increased odds of STH infection may reflect socio-behavioral and occupational patterns, as single individuals, particularly adult males, may be more engaged in farming or manual labor, which increases exposure to contaminated soil. They may also be less likely to participate in household-based MDA or seek preventive care. Similarly, education is often correlated with economic status and better access to sanitation, reducing contact with contaminated materials. Individuals without formal education are more susceptible to infection, likely due to limited awareness of preventive practices like hand-washing and safe food handling, along with restricted access to clean water and sanitation facilities. In contrast, those with higher education are more likely to adopt preventive behaviors, such as regular hand-washing and water treatment, which reduce infection risk [59].

Furthermore, reliance on unimproved water sources and the use of human excreta as manure were associated with a higher likelihood of infection. In lower-income communities, these practices often result from a lack of affordable, safer alternatives, increasing exposure to contaminants [56,60,61]. Households using treated human waste as manure may mistakenly assume it is safe, often relying on limited or inadequate protective measures and equipment. In some cases, they may adopt certain protective practices but wrongly believe these are sufficient, even when they are not effective. Expanding access to improved sanitation facilities, clean water sources, and modern fertilizers, along with raising awareness about the health risks associated with using human excreta, can promote safer waste disposal and hygiene practices, reducing contact with infectious agents and lowering infection rates.

Beyond socioeconomic factors, occupational and environmental exposures significantly influenced infection risk. Specifically, residing near marshlands, lakes, or rice-farming areas was strongly associated with higher infection rates, as these environments facilitate SCH transmission through snail vectors and support the survival of STH eggs and larvae [43]. Proximity to such water bodies increases exposure to contaminated water and soil, heightening the risk of infection. Evidence shows that adequate sanitation is associated with a lower likelihood of S. mansoni infection [62]. In this study, participants living farther from clean water sources had higher SCH prevalence, likely relying on untreated local water bodies for daily needs, which prolongs exposure to contamination [42]. These findings underscore the importance of context-specific interventions, including improving access to clean water and sanitation in high-risk areas.

In addition to environmental risks, occupational exposures play a critical role, particularly for individuals in jobs involving frequent contact with soil or water, such as farming and manual labor. These occupations lead to ongoing exposure to environments where STH eggs and SCH larvae thrive, making infection difficult to avoid without protective equipment or adequate sanitation facilities [43]. For example, rice farming, which requires prolonged water exposure, substantially increases infection risk [6365]. Some studies have also demonstrated a correlation between helminth egg counts in wastewater and soil samples and infections in farmers [66]. Our study suggests that the persistence of hookworm among adults (21% prevalence compared to 4.3% and 6.1% among pre-SAC and SAC) may be linked to occupational and rural lifestyle factors, compounded by the exclusion of adults from MDA programs. These findings support the need for control strategies that extend beyond MDA, including promoting consistent shoe-wearing, improving WASH infrastructure, and providing targeted hygiene education to reduce infection risks and support efforts to lower morbidity in high-risk communities [1,2,62].

Strengths and limitations

This study is the first national, community-based survey of STH and SCH in Rwanda, providing a broader perspective compared to traditional school-based assessments. By including adults alongside the traditionally assessed pre-SAC and SAC participants, it offers a comprehensive view of infection prevalence across all age groups. A key strength of the study was the use of focused mapping, which, while not fully aligned with the most recent WHO definition of precision mapping [24], emphasized targeting high-risk areas informed by ecological and local programmatic insights. This approach improved the accuracy of district-level estimates and ensured relevance for program planning by concentrating data collection where transmission was most likely. Furthermore, the combined use of KK and POC-CCA methods enhanced SCH detection, identifying cases that might have been missed by KK stool testing alone. Rigorous quality assurance measures, including training, pre-testing, and daily checks, ensured the collection of reliable and high-quality data.

Despite its strengths, the study has some limitations. The reliance on self-reported data for some variables, such as sanitation practices, could introduce recall bias. The use of a sampling strategy originally designed for SCH may have influenced STH estimates, as some low-risk villages were not included in the sampling frame; however, this limitation was likely mitigated by the large sample size and the broad geographic distribution of selected villages. Additionally, while the POC-CCA test offers greater sensitivity, particularly in low-endemic settings, it has batch-to-batch variations and may overestimate SCH prevalence due to false positives from trace readings, warranting further research to improve the accuracy of this diagnostic [10,11]. Future research should consider the WHO Target Product Profiles for schistosomiasis point-of-care products to address these challenges, focusing on developing reliable tools for low-prevalence areas. These TPPs aim to guide the creation of diagnostics that can accurately measure whether prevalence is above or below the 10% threshold, which is critical for determining MDA frequency [67]. Finally, another key limitation is that the study was powered to provide estimates only at the district level, not at the sub-district (e.g., cell or sector) level, which limits its direct utility for micro-targeting of MDA interventions. Future research should adopt precision assessment approaches and employ sampling designs that generate sub-district-level estimates to better inform localized treatment decisions.

Conclusion

This nationwide survey highlights that, despite ongoing MDA programs, STH and SCH remain significant public health challenges in Rwanda, particularly among adults and in high-risk regions. Structural and behavioral factors, such as limited education, the use of untreated human waste as manure, and proximity to lakes and marshlands, sustain transmission and reveal the limitations of traditional, school-based approaches. To effectively address these infections, MDA programs must be extended to include adults and integrated with efforts to improve sanitation, access to clean water, and community engagement in safe hygiene practices. Tackling these drivers and social determinants will enable more equitable and sustainable control, advancing toward the elimination of these infections.

Supporting information

S1 Text. Age-Adjusted Prevalence of Soil-Transmitted Helminths and Schistosoma mansoni.

(DOCX)

pntd.0013328.s001.docx (20.8KB, docx)
S1 Table. District level Prevalence and intensity by species.

(XLSX)

pntd.0013328.s002.xlsx (27.8KB, xlsx)
S2 Table. Prevalence of Hookworm, A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, and S. mansoni (KK, CCA Trace Positive/Negative) by sociodemographic characteristics.

(XLSX)

pntd.0013328.s003.xlsx (22.7KB, xlsx)
S3 Table. Univariate regression results for any STH and Schistosoma mansoni (ORs, 95% CIs, and Chi-Square Statistics).

(XLSX)

pntd.0013328.s004.xlsx (13.8KB, xlsx)
S4 Table. Summary results of 2008, 2014, and 2020 surveys used for comparison.

(DOCX)

pntd.0013328.s005.docx (15.8KB, docx)
S1 Data. Collection tools.

(DOC)

pntd.0013328.s006.doc (510.5KB, doc)
S1 File. STROBE Checklist [68].

(DOCX)

pntd.0013328.s007.docx (32.5KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the participants who took part in this study, as well as the dedicated data collectors and field teams whose hard work made this research possible. We also appreciate the support of community health workers, local leaders, and health center staff who facilitated the smooth coordination of data collection across the districts.

Data Availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are included in the article. The dataset is held by the Rwanda Biomedical Centre and cannot be publicly shared due to restrictions imposed by the Rwanda National Ethics Committee. Participant consent did not permit sharing data beyond the research team, and public disclosure would violate these terms. However, access to the data may be granted upon request, pending approval from the Rwanda Biomedical Centre and the Rwanda National Ethics Committee. To request access, please contact the Rwanda Biomedical Centre at info@rbc.gov.rw, providing a detailed rationale for your request.

Funding Statement

This work did not receive specific grant funding allocated directly to the authors. Funding to support this work was disbursed by the END Fund to the Rwanda Biomedical Centre (RBC) as part of the longstanding partnership under the program titled “Prevention, Control and Surveillance of NTDs in the Republic of Rwanda” (Grant Proposal Period: January 1, 2020 – December 31, 2022), based on the agreement fully executed on December 19, 2019. The END Fund provided technical input during study design and contributed to the review of study findings and the manuscript but was not involved in data analysis

References

  • 1.World Health Organization (WHO). Soil-transmitted helminth infections. 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/soil-transmitted-helminth-infections
  • 2.World Health Organization WHO. Schistosomiasis. Organisation, World Health. Available from: https://www.who.int. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, Geiger SM, Loukas A, Diemert D, et al. Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. Lancet. 2006;367(9521):1521–32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68653-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gasparinho C, Gonçalves MH, Chissaque A, Silva GL, Fortes F, Gonçalves L. Wasting, Stunting, and Anemia in Angolan Children after Deworming with Albendazole or a Test-and-Treat Approach for Intestinal Parasites: Binary Longitudinal Models with Temporal Structure in a Four-Arm Randomized Trial. Nutrients. 2022;14(11):2185. doi: 10.3390/nu14112185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Taylor-Robinson DC, Maayan N, Soares-Weiser K, Donegan S, Garner P. Deworming drugs for soil-transmitted intestinal worms in children: effects on nutritional indicators, haemoglobin and school performance. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(7):CD000371. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000371.pub4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ministry of Health Rwanda, Rwanda Biomedical Center. Rwanda malaria and neglected tropical diseases annual report 2018-2019. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ministry of Health Rwanda, Rwanda Biomedical Center (RBC). Neglected Tropical Diseases Strategic Plan 2019-2024. Kigali, Rwanda. 2019. Available from: https://rbc.gov.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/guide2019/guide2019/RWANDA%20NTD%20STRATEGIC%20PLAN%202019-2024.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kabatende J, Mugisha M, Ntirenganya L, Barry A, Ruberanziza E, Mbonigaba JB. Prevalence, intensity, and correlates of soil-transmitted helminth infections among school children after a decade of preventive chemotherapy in western Rwanda. Pathogens. 2020;9(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ruberanziza E, Owada K, Clark NJ, Umulisa I, Ortu G, Lancaster W. Mapping Soil-Transmitted Helminth Parasite Infection in Rwanda: Estimating Endemicity and Identifying At-Risk Populations. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019;4(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Colley DG, King CH, Kittur N, Ramzy RMR, Secor WE, Fredericks-James M, et al. Evaluation, Validation, and Recognition of the Point-of-Care Circulating Cathodic Antigen, Urine-Based Assay for Mapping Schistosoma mansoni Infections. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(1_Suppl):42–9. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Graeff-Teixeira C, Favero V, Pascoal VF, de Souza RP, Rigo F de V, Agnese LHD, et al. Low specificity of point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POCCCA) diagnostic test in a non-endemic area for schistosomiasis mansoni in Brazil. Acta Trop. 2021;217:105863. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tchuem Tchuenté L-A, Kueté Fouodo CJ, Kamwa Ngassam RI, Sumo L, Dongmo Noumedem C, Kenfack CM, et al. Evaluation of circulating cathodic antigen (CCA) urine-tests for diagnosis of Schistosoma mansoni infection in Cameroon. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(7):e1758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR), Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda] and II. Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey 2014-15 Final Report. Rockville, Maryland, USA: NISR, MOH, and ICF International; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR), Rwanda Ministry of Health (MOH). Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey 2019-20 Final Report. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR). 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.DeWorm3 Trials Team. Baseline patterns of infection in regions of Benin, Malawi and India seeking to interrupt transmission of soil transmitted helminths (STH) in the DeWorm3 trial. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(11):e0008771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Njenga SM, Mwandawiro CS, Muniu E, Mwanje MT, Haji FM, Bockarie MJ. Adult population as potential reservoir of NTD infections in rural villages of Kwale district, Coastal Kenya: implications for preventive chemotherapy interventions policy. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:175. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Toor J, Turner HC, Truscott JE, Werkman M, Phillips AE, Alsallaq R, et al. The design of schistosomiasis monitoring and evaluation programmes: The importance of collecting adult data to inform treatment strategies for Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(10):e0006717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Clark NJ, Umulisa I, Ruberanziza E, Owada K, Colley DG, Ortu G, et al. Mapping Schistosoma mansoni endemicity in Rwanda: a critical assessment of geographical disparities arising from circulating cathodic antigen versus Kato-Katz diagnostics. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(9):e0007723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ruberanziza E, Wittmann U, Mbituyumuremyi A, Mutabazi A, Campbell CH, Colley DG, et al. Nationwide Remapping of Schistosoma mansoni Infection in Rwanda Using Circulating Cathodic Antigen Rapid Test: Taking Steps toward Elimination. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(1):315–24. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rujeni N, Morona D, Ruberanziza E, Mazigo HD. Schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Rwanda: an update on their epidemiology and control. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40249-016-0212-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nyandwi E, Osei FB, Veldkamp T, Amer S. Modeling schistosomiasis spatial risk dynamics over time in Rwanda using zero-inflated Poisson regression. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):19276. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76288-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mather W, Hutchings P, Budge S, Jeffrey P. Association between water and sanitation service levels and soil-transmitted helminth infection risk factors: a cross-sectional study in rural Rwanda. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2020;114(5):332–8. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trz119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.World Health Organization WHO. Assessing schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiases control programmes monitoring and evaluation framework. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.World Health Organization W. Practical and precision assessments for schistosomiasis - a manual for impact assessments, version 1. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2025. https://www.ntdtoolbox.org/toolbox-search/schistosomiasis-practical-precision-assessment-sppa [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Baker MC, Mathieu E, Fleming FM, Deming M, King JD, Garba A, et al. Mapping, monitoring, and surveillance of neglected tropical diseases: towards a policy framework. Lancet. 2010;375(9710):231–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61458-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tchuem Tchuenté L-A, Stothard JR, Rollinson D, Reinhard-Rupp J. Precision mapping: An innovative tool and way forward to shrink the map, better target interventions, and accelerate toward the elimination of schistosomiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(8):e0006563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kepha S, Ochol D, Wakesho F, Omondi W, Njenga SM, Njaanake K, et al. Precision mapping of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis among school age children at the coastal region, Kenya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17(1):e0011043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda NISR. The Fifth Rwanda Population and Housing Census, Main Indicators Report. Kigali, Rwanda. 2023. https://www.statistics.gov.rw/publication/main_indicators_2022 [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning, National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. Fifth Rwanda Population and Housing Census, 2022 - Thematic Report - Population Projections. Kigali. 2023. https://www.statistics.gov.rw/publication/rphc5-thematic-report-population-projection [Google Scholar]
  • 30.National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. GDP National Accounts, 2020. Kigali, Rwanda. 2021. https://www.statistics.gov.rw/file/9561/download?token=MRWeHiMu [Google Scholar]
  • 31.National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. GDP National Accounts. Kigali, Rwanda. 2024. https://www.statistics.gov.rw/publication/2114 [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Government of Rwanda. Government of Rwanda: Administrative structure. https://www.gov.rw/government/administrative-structure. 2021.
  • 33.Garba A, Barkiré N, Djibo A, Lamine MS, Sofo B, Gouvras AN, et al. Schistosomiasis in infants and preschool-aged children: Infection in a single Schistosoma haematobium and a mixed S. haematobium-S. mansoni foci of Niger. Acta Trop. 2010;115(3):212–9. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.World Health Organization WHO. Helminth control in school-age children: a guide for managers of control programmes. 2011. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241548267
  • 35.World Health Organization WHO. Assessing schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiases control programmes monitoring and evaluation framework. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2024. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/379352/9789240099364-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bosch F, Palmeirim MS, Ali SM, Ame SM, Hattendorf J, Keiser J. Diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths using the Kato-Katz technique: What is the influence of stirring, storage time and storage temperature on stool sample egg counts?. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(1):e0009032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.World Health Organization WHO. Guide for Mapping Neglected Tropical Diseases Amenable to Preventive Chemotherapy in the African Region. Brazaville: WHO | Regional Office for Africa. 2018. https://www.eliminateschisto.org/sites/gsa/files/content/attachments/2020-02-13/AFRONTDMappingGuidevFeb2014_RevisedMarch2018.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 38.The Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources. About the Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources (MINAGRI). Available from: https://www.minagri.gov.rw/about
  • 39.National Agricultural Export Development Board. About the National Agricultural Export Development Board. Available from: https://www.naeb.gov.rw/about-naeb/overview
  • 40.World Health Organization WHO. Workshop on schistosomiasis sub-district level data review for shrinking the map; better utilization of available prevalence data and sub-district level planning for selected countries - Data Analysis Summary Report. 2019. Available from: https://espen.afro.who.int/system/files/content/resources/DataAnalysisSummaryReport.pdf
  • 41.E N D F, Rwanda Biomedical Centre. Rwanda’s progress towards controlling, interrupting transmission and eliminating schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiases: A review of program achievements, 2008 to 2020, and the revised treatment strategy and goals for 2024. Kigali- Rwanda. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vaz Nery S, Pickering AJ, Abate E, Asmare A, Barrett L, Benjamin-Chung J, et al. The role of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions in reducing soil-transmitted helminths: interpreting the evidence and identifying next steps. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3532-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hotez P, Bundy D, Beegle K, Brooker S, Drake L. Helminth infections: soil-transmitted helminth infections and schistosomiasis. World Bank. 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Oswald WE, Halliday KE, Mcharo C, Witek-McManus S, Kepha S, Gichuki PM, et al. Domains of transmission and association of community, school, and household sanitation with soil-transmitted helminth infections among children in coastal Kenya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(11):e0007488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Avokpaho EFGA, Houngbégnon P, Accrombessi M, Atindégla E, Yard E, Rubin MA, et al. Factors associated with soil-transmitted helminths infection in Benin: Findings from the DeWorm3 study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021. ;15(8):e0009646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ajjampur SSR, Kaliappan SP, Halliday KE, Palanisamy G, Farzana J, Manuel M, et al. Epidemiology of soil transmitted helminths and risk analysis of hookworm infections in the community: Results from the DeWorm3 Trial in southern India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(4):e0009338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Assefa G, Alemu M, Ayehu A. High Prevalence of Hookworm Species and Associated Factors among Soil-Transmitted Helminth-Infected Household Contacts in Burie Zuria District, Northwest Ethiopia: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Biomed Res Int. 2023;2023:6553913. doi: 10.1155/2023/6553913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Okoyo C, Nikolay B, Kihara J, Simiyu E, Garn JV, Freeman MC. Monitoring the impact of a national school based deworming programme on soil-transmitted helminths in Kenya: the first three years, 2012 - 2014. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ajjampur SSR, Kaliappan SP, Halliday KE, Palanisamy G, Farzana J, Manuel M, et al. Epidemiology of soil transmitted helminths and risk analysis of hookworm infections in the community: Results from the DeWorm3 Trial in southern India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(4):e0009338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pullan RL, Halliday KE, Oswald WE, Mcharo C, Beaumont E, Kepha S, et al. Effects, equity, and cost of school-based and community-wide treatment strategies for soil-transmitted helminths in Kenya: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10185):2039–50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32591-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Turner HC, Bundy DAP. Programmatic implications of the TUMIKIA trial on community-wide treatment for soil-transmitted helminths: further health economic analyses needed before a change in policy. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-3977-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Truscott JE, Hardwick RJ, Werkman M, Saravanakumar PK, Manuel M, Ajjampur SSR, et al. Forecasting the effectiveness of the DeWorm3 trial in interrupting the transmission of soil-transmitted helminths in three study sites in Benin, India and Malawi. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04572-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.World Health Organization WHO. Frequently asked questions on the joint application package for preventive chemotherapy planning, requesting medicines and reporting. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/faqs-the-joint-application-package-for-preventive-chemotherapy-planning-requesting-medicines-and-reporting. 2023.
  • 54.World Health Organization W. Guideline: preventive chemotherapy to control soil-transmitted helminth infections in at-risk population groups. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2017. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550116 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Palmeirim MS, Hürlimann E, Knopp S, Speich B, Belizario V Jr, Joseph SA, et al. Efficacy and safety of co-administered ivermectin plus albendazole for treating soil-transmitted helminths: A systematic review, meta-analysis and individual patient data analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(4):e0006458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gurmassa BK, Gari SR, Solomon ET, Goodson ML, Walsh CL, Dessie BK, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of soil transmitted helminths among vegetable farmers of Akaki river bank, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09704-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zerdo Z, Bastiaens H, Anthierens S, Massebo F, Masne M, Biresaw G, et al. Prevalence, intensity and endemicity of intestinal schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis and its associated factors among school-aged children in Southern Ethiopia. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):4586. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08333-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Cunningham LJ, Campbell SJ, Armoo S, Koukounari A, Watson V, Selormey P, et al. Assessing expanded community wide treatment for schistosomiasis: Baseline infection status and self-reported risk factors in three communities from the Greater Accra region, Ghana. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(4):e0007973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Witek-McManus S, Simwanza J, Chisambi AB, Kepha S, Kamwendo Z, Mbwinja A, et al. Epidemiology of soil-transmitted helminths following sustained implementation of routine preventive chemotherapy: Demographics and baseline results of a cluster randomised trial in southern Malawi. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(5):e0009292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Humphries DL, Stephenson LS, Pearce EJ, The PH, Dan HT, Khanh LT. The use of human faeces for fertilizer is associated with increased intensity of hookworm infection in Vietnamese women. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1997;91(5):518–20. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(97)90007-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Moya B, Parker A, Sakrabani R. Challenges to the use of fertilisers derived from human excreta: The case of vegetable exports from Kenya to Europe and influence of certification systems. Food Policy. 2019;85:72–8. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.05.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Grimes JET, Croll D, Harrison WE, Utzinger J, Freeman MC, Templeton MR. The relationship between water, sanitation and schistosomiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(12):e3296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mutombo N, Landouré A, Man WY, Fenwick A, Dembélé R, Sacko M. The association between child Schistosoma spp. infections and morbidity in an irrigated rice region in Mali: A localized study. Acta Trop. 2019;199:105115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Matthys B, Tschannen AB, Tian-Bi NT, Comoé H, Diabaté S, Traoré M, et al. Risk factors for Schistosoma mansoni and hookworm in urban farming communities in western Côte d’Ivoire. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12(6):709–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01841.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kazura JW, Neill M, Peters PA, Dennis E. Swamp rice farming: possible effects on endemicity of schistosomiasis mansoni and haematobia in a population in Liberia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1985;34(1):107–11. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1985.34.107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gurmassa BK, Gari SR, Solomon ET, Goodson ML, Walsh CL, Dessie BK, et al. Distribution of helminth eggs in environmental and stool samples of farming households along Akaki River in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Trop Med Health. 2023;51(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s41182-023-00558-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.World Health Organization. Diagnostic target product profiles for monitoring, evaluation and surveillance of schistosomiasis control programmes. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240031104 [Google Scholar]
  • 68.STROBE checklists. Available from: https://www.strobe-statement.org/checklists/
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013328.r001

Decision Letter 0

Angela Ionica

10 Mar 2025

Remapping parasite landscapes: a nationwide precision mapping of Schistosomiasis and Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis and associated risk factors in Rwanda

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Dear Dr. NSHIMIYIMANA,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases's publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript within 60 days, byMay 7th. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosntds@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pntd/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

* A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. This file does not need to include responses to any formatting updates and technical items listed in the 'Journal Requirements' section below.

* A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

* An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, competing interests statement, or data availability statement, please make these updates within the submission form at the time of resubmission. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Angela Monica Ionica, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Jong-Yil Chai

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-636XX

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-0002

Journal Requirements:

1) Please ensure that the CRediT author contributions listed for every co-author are completed accurately and in full.

At this stage, the following Authors/Authors require contributions: Ladislas Nshimiyimana, Aimable Mbituyumuremyi, Alison Ower, Dieudonne Hakizimana, Jean Bosco Mbonigaba, Elias Nyandwi, Karen Palacio, Alphonse Mutabazi, Jeanne Uwizeyimana, Leonard Uwayezu, Michee Kabera, Emmanuel Hakizimana, Phocas Mazimpaka, Emmanuel Ruzindana, Eliah Shema, Tharcisse Munyaneza, Jean Bosco Mucaca, Maurice Twahirwa, Esperance Umumararungu, Joseph Kagabo, Richard Habimana, Elias Niyituma, Tonya Huston, Jamie Tallant, Warren Lancaster, Nadine Rujeni, and Eugene Ruberanziza. Please ensure that the full contributions of each author are acknowledged in the "Add/Edit/Remove Authors" section of our submission form.

The list of CRediT author contributions may be found here: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/authorship#loc-author-contributions

2) Please ensure that the funders and grant numbers match between the Financial Disclosure field and the Funding Information tab in your submission form. Note that the funders must be provided in the same order in both places as well.

- State the initials, alongside each funding source, of each author to receive each grant. For example: "This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (####### to AM; ###### to CJ) and the National Science Foundation (###### to AM)."

- State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.".

If you did not receive any funding for this study, please simply state: u201cThe authors received no specific funding for this work.u201d

Reviewers' Comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods:

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Line 96 (Introduction): No description of the disease aside from the various worms causing the infection. Suggest providing at least a brief description of the mode of transmission and public health burden of SCH and STH, including e.g. the influence of sanitation, proximity to water bodies, any chronic conditions, risk of anaemia.

Line 191-193: What do trace results mean in relation to POC-CCA results? Perhaps a brief description of the test would aid readers in understanding how the test is run and the utility (sensitivity, specificity etc.) of POC-CCA for urine testing, especially in the field, instead of standard diagnosis by microscopic examination/urine filtration (noted in lines 255-256 that additional urine tests were only done when haematuria was detected).

Also, how would the POC-CCA results be compared to the previous 2 rounds of mapping? How were the urine samples tested previously?

Based these 3 lines, the authors presented SCH status when either stool or urine tested positive i.e.

1. POC-CCA trace results were negative

2. KK or POC-CCA tests were positive but trace results were negative

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

Results:

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Line 506: S. mansoni prevalence – is there a prevalence map by district available to illustrate this?

Line 547: The AORs were adjusted for what other variables, as this was not detailed in the methods?

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

Conclusions:

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Public health relevance, strengths and limitations, were clearly discussed.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Abstract, Line 48 and 52: “Fourteen districts had villages with an MHI prevalence48 of ≥2% for at least one STH species among SAC.” – SAC as the abbreviation for school-aged children will need to be written in full at first mention, same for AOR which I assume refers to adjusted odds ratio.

Line 148: ”…(500 mg) Samples were tested...”. Suggest having the manuscript checked for punctuation/language.

Line 157: “Schistosomiasis” can already be abbreviated here.

Line 184-185: “as positive” was mentioned twice in the same sentence.

Figure 5: Text is not clear especially within the graph, a clearer figure will be useful. The captions in grey font below the x-axis “Estimates are absolute differences between surveys…” should also be in the figure caption (Line 523).

Line 195: “Any STH status indicates the presence of any STH infection, including Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm, and Trichuris trichiura”. Scientific names were not italicised here.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

Summary and General Comments:

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: This paper reports on a national scale helminth survey in Rwanda, following several years of treatment. It’s timely as it compares infection with earlier surveys in 2008 and 2020. The sample size is large and involved the collections of duplicate Kato – Katz slides and a large data set examining risk factors for infection. There are a few areas where it could be strengthened and / or additional information provided before publication.

Comments

My biggest questions are around study design: in particular the geographical level at which results are calculated, and the sampling approach

• Geographical level of mapping / implementation. The WHO has moved towards recommending sub-district level mapping and implementation. In the Study design section (and similar in lines 699-723) the authors describe: ‘This study conducted a nationwide, community-based cross-sectional survey using a precision mapping approach to assess the prevalence and identify risk factors associated with SCH and STH.” And in lines 699-723 the authors talk about “A key strength of the study was the use of precision mapping, which provided a granular understanding of SCH, a focally distributed disease, resulting in more accurate prevalence estimates” and “The 2020 remapping exercise demonstrated how targeted sampling across diverse ecological settings can accurately identify transmission patterns at the community level”. But I only see results presented at the sector (district) level. Is that the level of implementation? To truly shrink the map then sub-district mapping and implementation is likely required. I do not think I consider the current approach as precision mapping, certainly not as most recently defined by WHO in the SPPA protocols. Was the mapping powered to give sub-district level results? If not, then I think much of section 699-723 needs amending.

• Sampling approach: In lines 294-295 the authors describe: “A three-stage sampling design was used to select study villages, focusing on areas likely to support schistosomiasis transmission due to their proximity to water bodies or wetlands.” (my emphasis). I think this is a reasonable programmatic approach when trying to (understandably) focus resources on the highest infection areas. But, by definition, it will lead to a biased estimate of sector / province / national level infection. And will inflate the current estimates and therefore underestimate any reductions since previous surveys (did they follow the same approach). I think this is worth the authors’ noting and discussing.

• The authors describe MHI infections as rare. MHI in Ascaris lumbricoides was 8.1%. This seems quite substantial to me, and more than would be expected from an overall Ascaris prevalence of 27.0%.

• How do the authors interpret the seeming conflicts in the SCH results: on one hand all sites had MHI < 1% so technically they have achieved elimination as a public health problem. But on the other hand, prevalence is still at 27% so continued MDA is required. Does this point to the need to update WHO guidance?

• The SCH prevalence levels (by KK) have hardly changed since 2008 (2.7% to 2.4%). What do the authors take from this?

• There is such a significant difference between SCH prevalence calculated by KK (1.7%) and CCA (27.2%). Even with trace negative it’s a 6-fold difference. What is the authors’ interpretation of this?

• The authors describe only 14 districts that had villages with >2% MHI? That seems very low when compared to overall MHI prevalence of Ascaris of 8.1%. Can it be checked?

• The blood in urine data are not presented. Was there no S. haematobium found? Was any urine filtration done?

• The survey was conducted in 2020. How much treatment has there been since then?

• Abstract – the authors do not mention overall SCH prevalence, as they do with STH. I suggest adding.

• Abstract – The odds ratios reported here, are they univariate or multivariate? What’s the theory behind being single being a risk factor?

• STH – Why do you think there is a drop in hookworm from 2008, but not in other STH species?

• Line 614-615: “This stagnation suggests that high MDA coverage in SAC alone may be insufficient to interrupt transmission.” Agreed, this is not a surprise.

• The option of combining IVM with ALB is well noted and worthy of further study.

Minor / editorial

• Lines 195-196, 425, 428 – species names should be in italics. Check throughout.

• Line 436 – repetition of ‘Additionally’.

Reviewer #2: The authors presented a nationwide remapping survey as an update to the last two surveys in 2008 and 2014, with the inclusion of adults and sampling of schools/villages in smaller administrative units. Compared to previous surveys focused upon school-aged children, this is the first community-based survey assessing prevalence across three targeted age groups: pre-school age, school age and adults. The findings highlight the need to include adults in MDA programs and improving access to clean water and sanitation for more sustainable disease control, noting the limited effectiveness of albendazole against Trichuriasis. Results were clearly described with maps to illustrate the data, however some methods require clarification.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes:  Collins Okoyo

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

Figure resubmission:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. If there are other versions of figure files still present in your submission file inventory at resubmission, please replace them with the PACE-processed versions.

Reproducibility:

?>

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review Comments.docx

pntd.0013328.s008.docx (16.8KB, docx)
Attachment

Submitted filename: PNTD-D-24-01920_reviewer.pdf

pntd.0013328.s009.pdf (3.4MB, pdf)
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013328.r003

Decision Letter 1

Angela Ionica

8 Jul 2025

Dear Dr. NSHIMIYIMANA,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Remapping Parasite Landscapes: Nationwide Prevalence, Intensity and Risk Factors of Schistosomiasis and Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis in Rwanda' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Angela Monica Ionica, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Jong-Yil Chai

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-636XX

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-0002

***********************************************************

p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 16.0px; font: 14.0px Arial; color: #323333; -webkit-text-stroke: #323333}span.s1 {font-kerning: none

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #3: The methods are well described in this revised version

**********

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #3: The results are well described in this revised version

**********

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #3: The conclusions are well stated

**********

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #3: All my initial comments have been addressed, I don’t have further comments

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #3: Yes:  Collins Okoyo

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013328.r004

Acceptance letter

Angela Ionica

Dear Mr. Nshimiyimana,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Remapping Parasite Landscapes: Nationwide Prevalence, Intensity and Risk Factors of Schistosomiasis and Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis in Rwanda," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Text. Age-Adjusted Prevalence of Soil-Transmitted Helminths and Schistosoma mansoni.

    (DOCX)

    pntd.0013328.s001.docx (20.8KB, docx)
    S1 Table. District level Prevalence and intensity by species.

    (XLSX)

    pntd.0013328.s002.xlsx (27.8KB, xlsx)
    S2 Table. Prevalence of Hookworm, A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, and S. mansoni (KK, CCA Trace Positive/Negative) by sociodemographic characteristics.

    (XLSX)

    pntd.0013328.s003.xlsx (22.7KB, xlsx)
    S3 Table. Univariate regression results for any STH and Schistosoma mansoni (ORs, 95% CIs, and Chi-Square Statistics).

    (XLSX)

    pntd.0013328.s004.xlsx (13.8KB, xlsx)
    S4 Table. Summary results of 2008, 2014, and 2020 surveys used for comparison.

    (DOCX)

    pntd.0013328.s005.docx (15.8KB, docx)
    S1 Data. Collection tools.

    (DOC)

    pntd.0013328.s006.doc (510.5KB, doc)
    S1 File. STROBE Checklist [68].

    (DOCX)

    pntd.0013328.s007.docx (32.5KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review Comments.docx

    pntd.0013328.s008.docx (16.8KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PNTD-D-24-01920_reviewer.pdf

    pntd.0013328.s009.pdf (3.4MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_STH_Rwanda_paper_Final-25 May 2025.docx

    pntd.0013328.s010.docx (158.6KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All data supporting the findings of this study are included in the article. The dataset is held by the Rwanda Biomedical Centre and cannot be publicly shared due to restrictions imposed by the Rwanda National Ethics Committee. Participant consent did not permit sharing data beyond the research team, and public disclosure would violate these terms. However, access to the data may be granted upon request, pending approval from the Rwanda Biomedical Centre and the Rwanda National Ethics Committee. To request access, please contact the Rwanda Biomedical Centre at info@rbc.gov.rw, providing a detailed rationale for your request.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES