Skip to main content
The Company of Biologists Open Access logoLink to The Company of Biologists Open Access
. 2025 Aug 7;152(15):dev204572. doi: 10.1242/dev.204572

The cell-adhesion molecule Echinoid promotes tissue survival and separately restricts tissue overgrowth

Danielle C Spitzer 1,*, William Y Sun 1, Anthony Rodríguez-Vargas 1, Iswar K Hariharan 1,✉
PMCID: PMC12377819  PMID: 40689564

ABSTRACT

The growth and survival of cells depends both on their intrinsic properties and interactions with their neighbors. In a screen of genes encoding cell-surface proteins for knockdowns that affect clone size or shape in mosaic Drosophila imaginal discs, we found that clones with reduced echinoid (ed) function are fewer and smaller, and are frequently eliminated during development. This elimination results, in significant part, from increased levels of apoptosis due to decreased Diap1 protein. We found that Hippo pathway activity is not decreased in ed mutant cells, as previously claimed, but is decreased in some of their immediate wild-type neighbors, consistent with the observed elimination of ed clones by a mechanism resembling cell competition. In contrast to the underrepresentation of ed clones, discs or compartments composed of mostly ed mutant tissue overgrow, despite having increased levels of apoptosis. The overgrowth results from a failure to arrest growth at the appropriate final size during an extended larval stage. Thus, ed has two distinct functions: an anti-apoptotic function via maintenance of Diap1 levels, and a function to arrest growth at the appropriate final size.

Keywords: Echinoid, Adhesion, Growth, Hippo, Cell competition


Summary: The Drosophila cell-adhesion protein Echinoid functions to prevent apoptosis by maintaining Diap1 levels and separately functions to arrest organ growth at the appropriate final size.

INTRODUCTION

Nowhere is the influence of neighbors more important than for cells in developing epithelia. In unicellular organisms, nutrient availability is the primary regulator of cell proliferation. In addition to nutrient availability, the survival, growth and proliferation of epithelial cells in multicellular organisms is regulated by various signals emanating from other cells (Lloyd, 2013). Such signals include diffusible factors that are secreted locally or circulate systemically (Conlon and Raff, 1999). The packing of cells into tissue layers generates mechanical forces that can influence cell proliferation and survival (LeGoff and Lecuit, 2016; Matamoro-Vidal and Levayer, 2019). Additionally, especially in epithelia, contacts between cells and their immediate neighbors, likely mediated by cell adhesion molecules, can determine whether cells remain within the layer or become extruded; extrusion often accompanies or promotes cell death (Bielmeier et al., 2016; Grata and Levayer, 2025).

The importance of the immediate neighbors of a cell in regulating its survival and proliferation is best illustrated by the phenomenon of cell competition, where ‘loser’ cells that are less fit for various reasons are eliminated only in the presence of faster-growing ‘winner’ cells (i.e. in genetic mosaics) (Morata and Ripoll, 1975) (reviewed by Amoyel and Bach, 2014; Baker, 2020; Cumming and Levayer, 2023; Nagata and Igaki, 2018). In their original discovery of this phenomenon, Morata and Ripoll (1975) found that cells heterozygous for a class of mutations known as Minute, which mostly disrupt ribosomal proteins (Marygold et al., 2007), are eliminated in the presence of wild-type cells. However, as a homogeneous population, they can generate animals of relatively normal size and shape, albeit much more slowly. Cells with Minute mutations upregulate a heterodimeric transcription factor composed of the Xrp1 and Irbp18 proteins, and this transcription factor is necessary for the elimination of Minute/+ clones as well as for the growth alterations observed in Minute/+ imaginal discs (Baillon et al., 2018; Langton et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2016, 2018). Clones of cells with mutations in genes encoding the E3 ubiquitin ligase component Mahjong (Ly et al., 2019; Tamori et al., 2010) or its binding partners are also eliminated via this pathway (Kumar and Baker, 2022).

Additionally, small patches of wild-type cells were shown to be eliminated when surrounded by cells having even modest increases in the level of Myc protein (de la Cova et al., 2004; Moreno and Basler, 2004). Cells capable of eliminating wild-type cells were dubbed ‘supercompetitors’. Cells with mutations in the Hippo pathway that have increased activity of the transcriptional co-activator Yorkie (Yki) (Neto-Silva et al., 2010; Tyler et al., 2007), cells with increased Wnt signaling (Vincent et al., 2011), cells with increased Jak/Stat signaling (Rodrigues et al., 2012) and cells with reduced crumbs function (Hafezi et al., 2012) also behave as supercompetitors. Collectively, these findings show that the designation of ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ is not determined by the genotype of the cell itself but by how it compares to its neighbors. How this comparison is achieved is still not well understood since many mutations that alter competitive ability affect intracellular proteins and comparison presumably must occur at the cell surface. Once the comparison has happened, ‘loser’ cells upregulate specific isoforms of the cell-surface protein Flower (Rhiner et al., 2010). In addition, ‘winner’ cells express higher levels of the Toll ligand Spätzle, which might promote the loser cell fate in adjacent cells (Alpar et al., 2018).

Several phenomena resemble classical cell competition, some of which appear to be mechanistically distinct. Clones of cells with mutations in genes encoding proteins that regulate apicobasal polarity, such as scribble (scrib) and discs large (dlg), are eliminated during development (Brumby and Richardson, 2003). However, imaginal discs or compartments of discs that are entirely composed of mutant cells overgrow and the epithelia are often multilayered (Bilder et al., 2000). The elimination of scrib or dlg clones requires the TNF ortholog Eiger (Igaki et al., 2009). The loss of apicobasal polarity re-localizes the Eiger receptor Grindelwald, rendering it accessible to Eiger with the result that cells undergo apoptosis (de Vreede et al., 2022). Furthermore, a signaling event at the clone interface involving the ligand Stranded at second (Sas) and the receptor PTP10D, which promotes the elimination of polarity-deficient cells, has been proposed (Yamamoto et al., 2017); however, others have questioned a requirement for PTP10D (Gerlach et al., 2022). Mis-specified cells can also be eliminated by a JNK-dependent pathway (Adachi-Yamada and O'Connor, 2002) that involves the transmembrane protein Fish-lips (Adachi-Yamada et al., 2005). Studies of this ‘interface surveillance’ phenomenon indicate that differences in levels of cell-surface molecules can induce cell elimination (Fischer et al., 2024; Prasad et al., 2023). There has also been an increasing appreciation of the importance of mechanical forces in eliminating slowly proliferating cells (Levayer et al., 2016; Mao et al., 2013; Marinari et al., 2012; Shraiman, 2005), but these mechanisms on their own cannot easily account for observations that most, if not all, cells of specific genotypes are selectively eliminated.

One class of proteins that likely plays an important role in mediating heterotypic interactions at clone interfaces are cell-surface proteins, particularly cell-adhesion molecules. The Drosophila genome encodes over 100 proteins containing cadherin motifs or Ig-loops, which are commonly used for cell-cell adhesion (Hynes and Zhao, 2000; Vogel et al., 2003). Although many have been studied extensively in neuronal contexts, relatively few have been examined for a role in epithelial cell survival or proliferation (Finegan and Bergstralh, 2020; Fischer et al., 2024), and fewer yet in a mosaic context. Here, we describe a genetic screen where we reduced the function of individual cell-surface proteins in clones of cells in the wing imaginal disc and identified those that affect clone size or shape. Of these, we focus on Echinoid (Ed) because its depletion in clones results in clone elimination, while depletion in the entire disc results in overgrowth. We demonstrate a role for Ed in maintaining levels of the anti-apoptotic protein Diap1 in cells and also a separate role in arresting growth when a tissue reaches its final size.

RESULTS

The goal of our screen was to identify cell-adhesion molecules that regulate the survival, proliferation or arrangement of epithelial cells, especially when those mutant cells are adjacent to wild-type cells. To that end, we generated clonal patches of cells with reduced levels of individual adhesion molecules amid wild-type cells in wing imaginal discs, and assessed the number, size and shapes of the mutant clones. We used the FLP-out Gal4 system (Pignoni and Zipursky, 1997) to activate Gal4 expression in clones of cells, which drove expression of an RNAi transgene under the control of Gal4-responsive UAS elements (Brand and Perrimon, 1993; Fischer et al., 1988). The cells expressing the RNAi transgene were marked by expression of a fluorescent protein (UAS-GFP or UAS-RFP). The size and shape of clones were compared to those expressing an RNAi transgene directed against the white (w) gene (UAS-w-RNAi).

For our screen, we initially compiled a list of 153 genes that encoded known or putative cell-adhesion molecules (Fig. 1A; Table S1). This candidate list included genes with cadherin or immunoglobulin domains identified by Hynes and Zhao (2000) or Vogel et al. (2003), as well as others that we included based on reports in the literature. Since we conducted our screen in the wing imaginal disc, we excluded 43 genes that were not expressed in wing discs using the single-cell RNAseq data of Everetts et al. (2021) and 10 genes whose localization and function precluded a role in cell-cell adhesion (e.g. sarcomere components) (Table S2). Of the remaining 100 genes, we screened 74 genes using 90 different RNAi lines (Table S3).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Clonal phenotypes observed in RNAi screen. (A) Summary of the screen. (B-L′) Phenotypes of imaginal discs containing clones generated with a FLP-out Gal4 and UAS-RNAi transgenes. Clones are marked by GFP or RFP, as indicated. A cyst-like clone in K is shown at higher magnification in L and an orthogonal view is provided in L′. Scale bar in B applies to B-K. Scale bar in L applies to L,L′.

While expression of most RNAi lines did not cause an obvious change in the number, size or shape of clones when compared to the expression of w-RNAi (Fig. 1B), five lines caused a reduction in clone size, two affected clone shape without reducing size, and two reduced clone size and generated rounder clones (Fig. 1A). Those that caused a marked reduction in clone number and size were amalgam (ama), beaten path Vc (beat-Vc), sidestep VII (side-VII), Contactin (Cont) and shotgun (shg) (Fig. 1C-G). Of these, only ama and shg were also found to impede cell growth or viability when knocked down in the entire posterior compartment rather than in clones, as assessed by an obvious decrease in posterior compartment size (Fig. S1), indicating that the clonal phenotype can differ from that elicited by more-widespread knockdown. Amalgam is a secreted protein whose best-characterized function is in axonal fasciculation (Frémion et al., 2000). Amalgam also has a role in regulating myoblast proliferation in leg discs and their interactions with tendon cells (Moucaud et al., 2024). Beat and Side family proteins interact with each other to facilitate cell adhesion. An analysis of physical interactions between Beat and Side proteins did not predict an interaction between Beat-Vc and Side-VII (Li et al., 2017). Contactin is a GPI-anchored protein needed to organize septate junctions of epithelial cells (Faivre-Sarrailh et al., 2004). shg encodes the Drosophila ortholog of E-cadherin, a homophilic adhesion molecule and a key component of adherens junctions (Oda et al., 1994; Tepass et al., 1996). Clones expressing RNAi constructs targeting fat (ft) (Fig. 1H) and dachsous (ds) (Fig. 1I) are rounder and larger than w-RNAi clones. Fat and Dachsous are atypical cadherins whose extracellular domains bind to each other; their role in regulating cell proliferation and cell division orientation has been studied extensively (reviewed by Fulford and McNeill, 2020; Thomas and Strutt, 2012). Knockdown of two genes, echinoid (ed) (Fig. 1J) and off-track2 (otk2) (Fig. 1K,L) generated fewer clones that were typically smaller and rounder than w-RNAi clones (Fig. 1B). otk2 clones were sometimes extruded as cysts (Fig. 1L,L′). The function of Otk2 is not well understood other than it likely functions as a co-receptor for the Wnt2 ligand (Linnemannstöns et al., 2014). Reduced growth of ed clones in imaginal discs has been noted previously (Escudero et al., 2003; Wei et al., 2005) but is not easily reconciled with some other functions of Ed (see below).

The Ed protein has an extracellular domain that includes seven Ig repeats and three FN-III repeats. Its 315 amino acid intracellular domain includes a C-terminal PDZ-binding protein that can interact either with Bazooka (Baz) or Canoe (Canoe) (Bai et al., 2001; Wei et al., 2005). Ed molecules on adjacent cells form homotypic adhesions via their extracellular domains (Rawlins et al., 2003b). ed clones are rounded with smooth outlines, in contrast to the irregular (‘wiggly’) boundaries of wild-type clones (Wei et al., 2005). ed mutant cells fail to assemble proper adherens junctions (AJs) at interfaces with wild-type cells (Chang et al., 2011; Laplante and Nilson, 2006; Wei et al., 2005). This differential adhesiveness likely causes these cells to remain together and sort away from wild-type cells (Steinberg, 1963; Townes and Holtfreter, 1955). Additionally, an actomyosin cable forms at Ed expression boundaries in the wild-type cells, potentially acting as a ‘mechanical fence’ (Chang et al., 2011; Laplante and Nilson, 2006, 2011; Lin et al., 2007; Wei et al., 2005). Together, these properties explain the roundness and apical smoothness of ed clones.

Ed is also thought to function as a signaling molecule. ed mutations were originally identified as dominant enhancers of a hypermorphic EGF receptor allele (Bai et al., 2001). Ed was subsequently shown to negatively regulate EGF receptor (EGFR) signaling (Bai et al., 2001; Fetting et al., 2009; Ho et al., 2010; Islam et al., 2003; Rawlins et al., 2003a; Spencer and Cagan, 2003) and positively regulate Notch signaling (Ahmed et al., 2003; Escudero et al., 2003; Rawlins et al., 2003b), possibly by promoting endocytosis of EGFR and Delta, respectively. More recently, reduced ed function has been shown to cause tissue overgrowth by decreasing signaling via the Hippo pathway (Yue et al., 2012). Ed interacts physically with multiple Hippo-pathway components, promotes the stability of Salvador (Sav), and curtails the expression of Yki-target genes that normally promote growth and cell survival. Since both the EGFR pathway and Yki promote cell survival and proliferation, and their activity would be predicted to increase in ed mutant tissue (Bergmann et al., 1998; Díaz-Benjumea and García-Bellido, 1990; Huang et al., 2005; Kurada and White, 1998), the underrepresentation of ed mutant tissue in clones is not easily explained. We therefore decided to examine the properties of ed mutant tissue in greater detail.

Clones of echinoid mutant cells in epithelia are eliminated by a process that resembles cell competition

We generated clones using four different ed-RNAi lines (Fig. 2A-D) to evaluate the strength of knockdown and the resulting phenotype. Clones were induced 72 h after egg lay (AEL) and imaginal discs were dissected at 120 h AEL. Lines V104279 (Fig. 2A) and V3087 (Fig. 2B) generated fewer and smaller clones than controls (compare to Fig. 1B), with almost undetectable Ed protein (Fig. 2A′,A″,B′,B″). BL38243 generated clones that were not smaller and had wiggly outlines, much like wild-type clones (Fig. 2D); the knockdown was least effective in this line based on detectable anti-Ed antibody staining (Fig. 2D′,D″). V938 had an intermediate effect (Fig. 2C-C″). We also used mitotic recombination to generate ed clones with the MARCM method (Fig. 2E-H). We observed that homozygous mutant MARCM clones of two different null alleles of ed (edIF20 and ed1x5) (Bai et al., 2001; de Belle et al., 1993) were completely absent from the disc epithelium (Fig. 2F,G). edIF20 and ed1x5 have early stop codons and are predicted to encode only small portions of the extracellular domain (Escudero et al., 2003). Clones that are homozygous for the hypomorphic allele edsIH8 (de Belle et al., 1993), which has a missense mutation that changes a conserved cysteine residue in the sixth extracellular Ig domain to serine (Escudero et al., 2003), were observed, but were less frequent and smaller than wild-type clones (Fig. 2H). In all these experiments, large clones of myoblasts are often observed beneath the epithelium in the notum region of the disc (Fig. 2F′). Although Ed is expressed in wing disc-associated myoblasts based on single cell RNA-seq data (Everetts et al., 2021), and is required for targeting and morphogenesis of some embryonic and larval body wall muscles (Swan et al., 2006), ed-depleted myoblast clones do not have an obvious growth or survival disadvantage. As described previously (Chang et al., 2011; Laplante and Nilson, 2006, 2011; Lin et al., 2007; Wei et al., 2005), an apical actomyosin cable was observed in epithelial ed/ed clones at the mutant clone periphery (Fig. S2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Clones of echinoid mutant cells are eliminated when surrounded by wild-type cells. (A-D) Imaginal discs containing GFP-marked ed-RNAi clones. Four different UAS-ed-RNAi transgenes were used. (A′-D″) Clones stained with an anti-Ed antibody (outlined in A-D) at higher magnification. (E-H) Clones that are homozygous for the chromosome arm bearing FRT40A alone (E) or FRT40A and an allele of ed (F-H) generated using the MARCM method (Lee and Luo, 1999). Homozygous mutant clones are positively marked with GFP. Note the near absence of clones in the epithelium with the two null ed alleles (F,G) and the presence of myoblast clones underlying the notum (arrowheads in F-H). An orthogonal view is shown in F′ with the disc epithelium outlined; the GFP-marked myoblasts are located basal to the epithelium. The A/B double-headed arrow in F′ indicates apicobasal orientation of the wing disc proper epithelium. Both epithelial and myoblast clones are observed with the hypomorphic allele (H). (I-K) Clones homozygous for either a wild-type chromosome arm distal to FTR40A (I) or edIF20, FRT40A (J), marked white, generated using eyFLP. The tester chromosome carries a recessive cell lethal allele l(2)cl-L31, resulting in the absence of wild-type twin spots when homozygous. (K) An overlay of the overgrown eye containing ed clones and the normally sized eye containing wild-type clones. (L,M) Clones generated using eyFLP using a wild-type tester chromosome that does not carry a recessive cell lethal mutation. FRT40A clones (L) and edIF20 FRT40A clones (M) are white, while the wild-type twin spots appear red. Note the almost complete absence of homozygous ed/ed tissue in eyes that contain wild-type twin spots.

Yue et al. (2012) previously reported that ed/ed clones generated during eye development were overgrown. An important difference between that experiment and our experiments is that their clones were generated in a stock where the wild-type chromosome carried a recessive cell-lethal mutation. Thus, following eyFLP-driven mitotic recombination, the eye disc would contain mostly ed/ed tissue as well as a small amount of ed/+ tissue that had not undergone mitotic recombination. Consistent with their observations, when the wild-type chromosome carries a recessive cell-lethal mutation, we also find that eyes composed almost entirely of edIF20/edIF20 tissue are overgrown (Fig. 2I-K). However, when a recessive cell-lethal mutation is not used to eliminate the wild-type twin clones, we observed almost no homozygous ed/ed tissue (Fig. 2L,M). Thus, ed/ed tissue can survive, and even overgrow, when it makes up most of the disc. In contrast, ed/ed tissue is extremely underrepresented in the presence of wild-type tissue. This indicates the importance of wild-type cells in the elimination of ed/ed cells.

To further explore this phenomenon, we generated ed-RNAi clones at variable densities by expressing hs-FLP for 12 min, 15 min or 30 min (Fig. 3A-F). With the shortest heat shock, there were far fewer ed-RNAi clones than w-RNAi (control) clones (Fig. 3A,B). As clone density increased with longer heat shocks until the clones collectively accounted for most of the tissue in the disc, the representation of ed-RNAi tissue and w-RNAi tissue was similar (Fig. 3C-F). Thus, the loss of ed mutant tissue is most likely to occur when those clones are surrounded by wild-type cells.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

echinoid clones are generated and then die, especially when more wild-type tissue is present. (A-F) Wing discs containing GFP-marked clones expressing either UAS-w-RNAi (A,C,E) or UAS-ed-RNAi (B,D,F). Heat shocks of 12 min (A,B), 15 min (C,D) and 30 min (E,F) generate clones at progressively higher density. (G-K) An experiment to examine ed/ed clones 24 h and 72 h after generation by mitotic recombination. The design of the experiment is shown in G. Discs were dissected 120 h AEL and clones were induced either 24 h (H,I) or 72 h (J,K) before dissection. Clones generated using the FRT40A chromosome (H,J) are compared to clones homozygous for edIF20 (I,K). The outlined areas are shown in the insets. Scale bar in H applies to H-K. Scale bar in A applies to A-F.

In their original description of cell competition, Morata and Ripoll (1975) observed that Minute clones were eliminated when generated early in development but were still observable when generated much later in development. To determine if this was also the case with ed/ed clones, we generated clones either 48 h or 96 h AEL using mitotic recombination, and dissected discs at 120 h AEL (Fig. 3G). Thus, the discs developed for 72 h or 24 h after clone generation, respectively (Fig. 3H-K). Marked wild-type clones were much larger 72 h after clone generation (Fig. 3J) than 24 h after clone generation (Fig. 3H). In stark contrast, ed/ed clones were observed readily 24 h after clone generation (Fig. 3I) but were mostly absent 72 h after clone generation (Fig. 3K). At 72 h after clone generation, their wild-type sister clones were similar in size to wild-type clones generated at similar times (Fig. 3J,K). Thus, ed/ed clones proliferate for a short time and are then eliminated. The propensity of ed/ed tissue to be eliminated when surrounded by wild-type tissue, and to survive and grow when it accounts for most of the tissue resembles other instances of cell competition. However, unlike Minute/+ clones, expression of the Xrp1-lacZ reporter is not elevated in ed/ed clones (Fig. S3A-D), indicating that ed/ed clone elimination and Minute/+ clone elimination are somewhat mechanistically distinct.

Increased apoptosis and reduced levels of Diap1 are observed in echinoid mutant tissue

In many situations where clones of cells of a certain genotype (e.g. Minute/+) are eliminated by cell competition, their elimination occurs by caspase-mediated apoptosis, and their death can be rescued by expression of the baculovirus p35 protein (Martín et al., 2009), which inhibits effector caspases (Hay et al., 1994). We therefore generated clones expressing either w-RNAi or ed-RNAi in the presence or absence of p35 (Fig. 4A-D). While expression of p35 modestly increases the recovery of wild-type clones (Fig. 4A,B), there was a dramatic increase in the recovery of clones expressing ed-RNAi (Fig. 4C,D), indicating that effector caspase activity is necessary for ed clone elimination. Apoptotic cells in Drosophila express a cleaved version of Death Caspase-1 (Dcp-1) (Song et al., 1997) that is recognized by the anti-Dcp-1 antibody. In discs containing w-RNAi clones, occasional Dcp-1 staining was observed (Fig. 4E,E′). In contrast, punctate Dcp-1 staining was observed within ed-RNAi clones, especially in basal focal planes (Fig. 4F,F′). These puncta were often at the clone edge where it abuts wild-type tissue, suggesting that competition with neighbors may be involved. Taken together, these observations indicate that cells with reduced ed function die by apoptosis at an increased rate; this contributes significantly to ed clone elimination.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

echinoid mutant tissue has higher apoptosis levels and lower Diap1 levels. (A-D) Wing discs containing GFP-marked clones that express either UAS-w-RNAi (A,B) or UAS-ed-RNAi (C,D). Clones that also express UAS-p35 are shown in B,D. (E-F′) Imaginal discs containing GFP-marked clones expressing UAS-w-RNAi (E) or UAS-ed-RNAi (high clone density) (F). Anti-Dcp-1 staining of the same discs are shown in E′,F′. Images were taken at a basal z-plane where Dcp-1 staining was most prominent. Arrowheads in F,F′ highlight examples of anti-Dcp1 staining near clone boundaries. (G-H′) Discs expressing UAS-ed-RNAi alone (low clone density) (G) or both UAS-ed-RNAi and UAS-diap1 in GFP-marked clones, stained with anti-Diap1 (G′,H′). Arrowheads in G,G′ show the location of clones where reduced Diap1 is apparent. ‘Rescued’ clones (H,H′) still have smooth borders.

An important regulator of apoptosis is the IAP protein Diap1 (Hay et al., 1995), which inhibits caspase activation. When discs containing ed-RNAi clones were stained with an anti-Diap1 antibody, a reduction in Diap1 levels was observed within many clones (Fig. 4G,G′). If Diap1 reduction has a role in promoting the death of ed mutant cells, then restoring Diap1 levels should reduce or prevent clone elimination. To examine this possibility, we expressed UAS-diap1 concurrently with UAS-ed-RNAi, which resulted in the recovery of many UAS-ed-RNAi clones (Fig. 4H,H′). This suggests that the reduced Diap1 protein level in ed mutant clones has a role in their elimination. The ed-RNAi clones that were rescued by diap1 overexpression still had smooth outlines, indicating that this property of the clones is separable from the propensity of clones to be eliminated.

Although consistent with increased apoptosis, our finding that Diap1 levels were reduced in ed clones was surprising because a previous study reported decreased activity of the Hippo signaling pathway and increased expression of Yki target genes, including diap1, in ed clones (Yue et al., 2012). This prompted us to further investigate Hippo pathway activity in and around ed clones.

Yki-target genes are altered in and around ed clones

Clones mutant for Hippo pathway components have increased levels of Diap1 protein (Tapon et al., 2002) and increased expression of diap1 transcriptional reporters (Wu et al., 2003). Using a transcriptional reporter of diap1 that contains eight copies of a Hippo-responsive element (HRE) (Wu et al., 2008), we observed decreased reporter expression in ed-RNAi clones and sometimes observed increased expression in cells immediately outside the clone (Fig. 5A,A′); we also observe this ‘border effect’ in many clones when staining with anti-Diap1 (Fig. 5B,B′). Additionally, two other Yki-responsive transcriptional reporters, fj-lacZ (Brodsky and Steller, 1996) and bantam-lacZ (Herranz et al., 2012) (a direct reporter of bantam transcription, not the bantam sponge that is inversely correlated to ban levels), are expressed at lower levels in ed-RNAi clones and at higher levels in some neighboring cells (Fig. 5C,C′,D,D′).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Hippo pathway reporters are altered in and around echinoid clones. (A,A′) RFP-marked (A) ed-RNAi clone shows decreased expression of a diap1 transcriptional reporter generated using eight copies of the Hippo-response element (HRE) from the diap1 locus (A′). (B,B′) GFP-marked (B) ed-RNAi clones stained with anti-Diap1 (B′). (C,C′) RFP-labeled (C) ed-RNAi clone shows decreased fj-lacZ expression (C′). Wild-type cells adjacent to the clone show increased fj-lacZ expression. (D,D′) GFP-labeled (D) ed-RNAi clone shows decreased ban-lacZ expression (D′). Wild-type cells adjacent to the clone show increased ban-lacZ expression. (E-E‴) RFP-labeled (E,E′) ed-RNAi clones show no obvious alteration in the localization of either GFP-tagged Yki (E″) or anti-Yki staining (E‴). The region shown at higher magnification in E′-E‴ is outlined in E. (F,F′) GFP-marked (F) ed-RNAi clones stained with an anti-Ft antibody (F′). The inset shows a higher magnification of the boundary of the clone. F and F′ show different z-planes of the same image because the Ft signal is located at a z-plane with weak GFP signal. Scale bar in A applies to A-D′. Scale bar in F' (inset) is 5 µm.

Since nuclear Yki drives the Hippo pathway-mediated expression of diap1, fj and bantam, we examined Yki localization in and around ed-RNAi clones. Using a GFP-tagged Yki (Fletcher et al., 2018) and an anti-Yki antibody, we observed no difference in Yki localization between ed-RNAi clones and neighboring wild-type cells (Fig. 5E-E‴). This result contrasts with data presented by Yue et al. (2012), which showed strong nuclear localization of Yki in ed cells and diffuse staining in wild-type cells. We found their result surprising, given that Yki antibody stains typically produce a ‘honeycomb-like’ pattern in wild-type cells in the disc proper of the wing imaginal disc due to nuclear exclusion; nuclear relocalization of Yki caused by Hippo pathway mutations generally results in more uniform staining of the cytoplasm and nucleus, rather than in strong, distinctly nuclear staining (see, for example, Fig. 3C,D in Dong et al., 2007). In summary, because we observed lower expression of at least three Yki-dependent reporter genes and no obvious change in Yki localization within ed clones, our results are inconsistent with the previous assertion (Yue et al., 2012) that ed mutant tissue has increased levels of nuclear Yki and increased expression of Yki-target genes.

Border effects like those observed in ed clones have been described previously in response to manipulations of the Fat/Dachsous (Ft/Ds) pathway (Matakatsu and Blair, 2012; Willecke et al., 2008). To investigate a possible role for this pathway, we stained discs containing ed-RNAi clones with anti-Ft. We observed increased staining in the clones (Fig. 5F,F′) that might be due to increased Ft levels, concentration of Ft protein into a smaller area of apically constricted membrane, or a combination of both. Apical constriction within ed clones, as well as apical expansion of their immediate neighbors, has been noted previously (Chang et al., 2011; Laplante and Nilson, 2006; Wei et al., 2005). Apical expansion could dilute the Ft concentration in the cells immediately adjacent to the clone. A relative reduction in Ft levels in the border cells would be expected to reduce Hippo pathway activity (Bennett and Harvey, 2006; Cho et al., 2006; Silva et al., 2006; Willecke et al., 2006) and increase expression of Yki-target genes in those border cells, as we have observed, thus providing a potential mechanism through which cells with reduced ed function can interact with their wild-type neighbors. In the absence of direct evidence that the increased expression of Yki target genes in wild-type cells bordering the clone is caused by alterations in Ft distribution, a variety of other mechanisms, ranging from changes in various signaling pathways to alterations in cell adhesion, could apply.

We tested whether overexpression of ed had opposite effects on Yki targets to those observed when ed function was reduced. Diap1 protein levels were unaffected in ed-overexpressing clones (Fig. S4A,A′) but reduced when ed was overexpressed in the entire posterior compartment (Fig. S4B,B′). In contrast, ban-lacZ expression was increased in ed-overexpressing clones (Fig. S4C,C′). Expression ex-lacZ was increased by ed overexpression in the entire posterior compartment, particularly in the ed-overexpressing cells abutting wild-type cells (Fig. S4D,D′). These results with ed overexpression also do not support a simple relationship between Ed and Yki where increased levels of Ed would reduce Yki activity, as Yue et al. (2012) have proposed.

Imaginal discs with reduced ed function grow more slowly but fail to arrest their growth at the appropriate size

Previous work has indicated that reducing ed function in most, or all, cells of the imaginal disc results in overgrowth (Bai et al., 2001; Yue et al., 2012). This, at first glance, seems inconsistent with the phenotype we observed in clones. ed clones in mosaic tissue have increased levels of cell death and reduced Diap1 levels. Does this also apply to entire ed-depleted compartments in the wing disc? We investigated this by expressing ed-RNAi using hh-Gal4, which is expressed in the entire posterior compartment (Fig. 6A-D). In these wing discs, we observed increased levels of apoptosis (Fig. 6A,B) and reduced Diap1 levels (Fig. 6C,D). To study the growth properties of these discs, we examined them at different stages of development (Fig. 6E-K). At 120 h AEL, when control larvae (hh-Gal4, UAS-w-RNAi) have reached the late third instar, the posterior compartments of discs of mutant larvae (hh-Gal4, UAS-ed-RNAi) were much smaller (Fig. 6F,H). However, the discs of mutant larvae continued to grow through an extended larval stage and could reach a size much larger than ever observed in wild-type discs (Fig. 6I-K). Interestingly, although the ed-RNAi is only expressed in the posterior compartment, increased growth was also observed in the anterior compartment. This observation is consistent with the phenomenon of positional accommodation that can occur in imaginal discs, where changes to growth in mosaic tissues exerts a non-autonomous effect on the growth of wild-type tissues (Díaz-Benjumea et al., 1989; García-Bellido, 2009; García-Bellido et al., 1994). This may be mediated by increased morphogen production from the enlarged posterior compartment. We observed a relatively normal pattern of phospho-Mad staining in overgrown discs generated using en-Gal4 (which has a similar expression pattern to hh-Gal4), indicating that Dpp production scales with the larger discs (Fig. S5).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Characteristics of discs with compartment-wide echinoid loss. (A-D′) Effect of reducing ed function in the posterior compartment on apoptosis and Diap1. (A-B′) hh-Gal4 drives expression of UAS-GFP (A,A′) or UAS-GFP and UAS-ed-RNAi (B,B′). Apoptotic cells are visualized with anti-Dcp1 (A′,B′). (C-D′) Discs expressing w-RNAi (C) or ed-RNAi (D) in the entire posterior compartment stained with anti-Diap1 (C′,D′). Scale bar in A applies to A-D′. (E-K) Time course of growth of imaginal discs expressing either w-RNAi (E,F) or ed-RNAi (G-K) in the GFP-marked posterior compartment. All larvae expressing w-RNAi pupariated soon after 120 h. Much older larvae were observed in the population expressing ed-RNAi; examples of discs from these larvae are shown. Scale bar in E applies to E-K. (L,M) Effect of reducing ed function in the posterior compartment on Ilp8 expression. hh-Gal4, Ilp8-GFP (L) discs do not express detectable levels of Ilp8-GFP, but when hh-Gal4 drives expression of ed-RNAi (M), Ilp8-GFP is elevated in a pattern that coincides with the expected location of the unmarked posterior compartment. Scale bar in L applies to L,M.

Ilp8 protein is secreted by tissues undergoing repair after damage and by tissues that grow excessively due to genetic perturbations such as mutations that disrupt apicobasal polarity. Ilp8 production extends the larval phase of development by delaying the surge in ecdysone production that triggers entry into metamorphosis (Colombani et al., 2012; Garelli et al., 2012). Expression of ed-RNAi in the posterior compartment results in increased expression of ilp8-GFP (Fig. 6L,M), indicating a likely role for ilp8 in extending the larval phase of development in hh-Gal4, UAS-ed-RNAi discs. Thus, at least under the conditions of this experiment, ed mutant tissue grows more slowly than wild-type tissue (likely due to the increased cell death). However, pupariation is delayed and discs can eventually grow to be unusually large, indicating a defect in the mechanism that normally arrests growth at the appropriate final size.

Echinoid regulates the size and shape of the adult wing

If one role for ed is the arrest of growth at the correct final size, then reducing ed function would be expected to increase wing size. Adult flies homozygous for null alleles of ed were not obtained, implying lethality at an earlier stage of development. We therefore examined the size of adult wings in a null/hypomorph heteroallelic combination, edIF20/edsIH8. Wings of these flies were 9% larger by area than wings of wild-type (Oregon-R) flies (Fig. 7A-D,D′,I). We also reduced ed function in the wing pouch using nub-Gal4 or rn-Gal4 to express UAS-ed-RNAi and found that this increased wing area by 15% (nub-Gal4) and 34% (rn-Gal4) compared to controls (Fig. 7E-H,H′,I). Conversely, overexpression of ed using nub-Gal4 or rn-Gal4 resulted in smaller wings (Fig. 7J,K). This may indicate that wing size is directly sensitive to ed dosage, but it is also possible that different mechanisms mediate ed overexpression and depletion phenotypes (e.g. ed overexpression could reduce wing size through non-specific toxicity). Because the nub-Gal4 and rn-Gal4 lines have reduced wing size compared to Oregon-R (Fig. 7I), all wing-area experiments using Gal4 drivers were compared to controls that also contained the same Gal4 driver, rather than to Oregon-R, to minimize confounding effects due to genetic background. Thus, as described previously (Bai et al., 2001; Yue et al., 2012), reducing functional ed results in tissue overgrowth whereas overexpressing ed leads to reduced tissue size.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Reduced echinoid function increases adult wing size. (A-I) Effect of reducing ed function on adult wing size. (A-H′) Adult wings of the indicated genotypes. (D′) Overlay of A and D. (F′) Overlay of E and F. (H′) Overlay of G and H. Quantification of wing areas is shown in I. n=10 wings [+/+ (Oregon-R); edsIH8/+; edIF20/+; edsIH8/edIF20; nub-Gal4, >GFP, >w-RNAi], 9 wings (nub-Gal4, >GFP, >ed-RNAi; rn-Gal4) and 19 wings (rn-Gal4, >ed-RNAi). ns indicates P>0.05, **P<0.01 (one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's HSD test). For box and whisker plots, the horizontal line is the median, the box is the interquartile range and the whiskers extend to the largest (upper whisker) or smallest (lower whisker) value that is no further from the hinge than 1.5× inter-quartile range. (J,K) Effect of overexpressing ed on adult wing size. Overexpression using either nub-Gal (J) or rn-Gal4 (K) dramatically reduced wing size. Scale bar in A applies to A-H′,J,K.

Ed could function in cell-cell adhesion, as a signaling molecule, or have both functions. To determine which of these properties of Ed are necessary for growth arrest, we examined how wing size is affected by expression of transgenes encoding Ed proteins that contain the extracellular and transmembrane domains but not the intracellular domain [UAS-edΔC-GFP (Laplante and Nilson, 2011) or the less well characterized UAS-edΔIntra-GFP (a gift from J.-C. Hsu, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan)]. These truncated proteins would presumably retain the capacity to form extracellular adhesions, but not function as signaling molecules. Overexpression of edΔC-GFP reduced adult wing size compared to controls (Fig. S6A-B,H), but UAS-edΔIntra-GFP expression did not have a significant effect on wing size (Fig. S6C-D,H). The effect of overexpressing the full-length protein (UAS-edFull) was much stronger (Fig. 7J,K) but wing areas could not be quantified because most wings were crumpled. Next, we examined whether either edFull or edΔC-GFP can rescue the overgrowth phenotype of edsIH8/edIF20 wings (Fig. S6E-H). Inclusion of nub-Gal4 in the edsIH8/edIF20 background reduced wing sizes to a size similar to that of the wild-type and ed/+ flies (Fig. S6E,H). Including either a UAS-edFull or UAS-edΔC-GFP transgene further reduced wing size (Fig. S6F-H).

Ed-depleted wings have a rounded, stout shape due to a hexagonal packing defect during pupal wing elongation (Chan et al., 2021). We assessed the roundness of wings in our ed depletion, overexpression and rescue experiments based on the ratio of proximodistal length to anteroposterior width (PD/AP ratio) (Fig. S4I). Consistent with previous reports, we found that edsIH8/edIF20 and nub- or rn-Gal4, UAS-ed-RNAi wings were significantly rounder than controls, as were +/edsIH8 and +/edIF20 heterozygotes. In the edsIH8/edIF20 background, expression of UAS-edFull using nub-Gal4 rescued the defect in the PD/AP ratio. Roundness of nub- or rn-Gal4, UAS-edFull wings in a wild-type background could not be quantified since most wings were crumpled. nub-Gal4-driven overexpression of edΔC-GFP, but not rn-Gal4-driven overexpression of edΔIntra-GFP, reduced wing roundness. nub-Gal4-driven overexpression of edΔC-GFP also partially rescued the roundness of edsIH8/edIF20 wings.

In summary, expression of either edFull or edΔC-GFP produces opposing effects on wing size and shape to ed depletion, and these transgenes can rescue the overgrowth and roundness of edsIH8/edIF20 wings. Since at least one transgene lacking the intracellular domain functions in this way, this suggests that the putative signaling domain is not essential for the effects of Ed on wing size or shape; at least some functions of Ed in wing morphogenesis are likely mediated by cell-cell adhesion. While the growth reduction caused by the overexpression transgenes could result from non-specific effects on cell growth, this is less likely to explain the effect on the wing PD/AP ratio. Additionally, since the hypomorphic missense allele edsIH8 present in our rescue experiments presumably retains a functional C-terminal domain, we cannot formally exclude the possibility that this protein might form a heterodimer with the EdΔC-GFP protein that functions in an unusual way as a signaling molecule (the heterodimer would contain one wild-type extracellular domain and a wild-type cytoplasmic domain, albeit on different molecules).

DISCUSSION

To systematically assess the requirement of individual cell-surface proteins in regulating cell survival or proliferation in clones, we examined the effect of reducing the expression of 74 such genes. Although we did not verify the efficacy of the RNAi knockdown in each case, we found that for 66 genes, there was no obvious decrease in clone size or alteration of clone shape. Thus, most cell-surface proteins, at least individually, do not function to sustain cell survival or proliferation.

Of the genes identified in the screen, we chose to focus on ed for two reasons. First, reducing ed function has very different effects in clones and in entire tissues. Clones with reduced ed function are eliminated, while imaginal discs with reduced ed function in large regions overgrow. In some ways, this phenotype is reminiscent of cells with disruptions in apicobasal polarity, such as scrib (Bilder et al., 2000; Brumby and Richardson, 2003; Hariharan and Bilder, 2006), with the important difference being that cells lacking ed seem to preserve most aspects of their apicobasal polarity and their tissue architecture appears relatively normal.

Second, previous studies have reported that ed mutant tissue has increased EGFR signaling (Bai et al., 2001; Fetting et al., 2009; Ho et al., 2010; Islam et al., 2003; Rawlins et al., 2003a; Spencer and Cagan, 2003) and reduced Hippo pathway activity, resulting in increased Yki-target gene expression (Yue et al., 2012). Both changes would be expected to promote cell survival and proliferation, thus the underrepresentation and elimination of ed mutant clones is unexpected. Previous work (Chang et al., 2011; Laplante and Nilson, 2006, 2011; Lin et al., 2007; Wei et al., 2005) and our observations (Fig. S2) have shown that ed mutant cells sort away from wild-type cells and an actomyosin cable forms in wild-type cells at the clone interface that could potentially promote clone extrusion. We also confirmed that EGFR signaling is likely elevated, as assessed by reduced levels of nuclear Capicua (Fig. S7A-C). However, our observations are not consistent with the previously proposed effect on the Hippo pathway (Fig. 5A-E, Fig. S4A-D).

A study that investigated neuroblast quiescence (Ding et al., 2016) seems, at first glance, to support the previously proposed view of Ed as a positive regulator of Hippo signaling. In that study, reducing Hippo signaling in the neuroblast could promote an emergence from quiescence, as assessed by an increase in neuroblast diameter and proliferation. Autonomous expression of ed-RNAi also increased neuroblast size. However, neuroblast size increase was also observed when ed-RNAi was expressed in adjacent glial cells. This effect could therefore also be explained by a reduction in adhesion of the neuroblast to its glial niche, which then allows for increased growth and proliferation. This result also highlights how more complex and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms could link Ed to the Hippo pathway.

Why are ed clones eliminated?

Cells lacking ed function have increased apoptosis. We observed this in clones, especially at clone boundaries, and when ed was depleted in broader domains. This elevated baseline propensity for apoptosis in mutant cells, enhanced at interfaces with wild-type cells, resembles the phenotype resulting from Minute mutations (Akai et al., 2021; Baumgartner et al., 2021; Coelho et al., 2005; Recasens-Alvarez et al., 2021). We found that ed mutant tissue has reduced levels of the anti-apoptotic protein Diap1 and that ed clone elimination could be rescued by co-expressing diap1 with ed-RNAi. These observations suggest the reduction in Diap1 levels underlies, in significant part, ed clone elimination.

In ed clones, we observed decreased expression of a diap1 transcriptional reporter that was constructed using multiple copies of a Hippo-responsive element from the diap1 locus (Wu et al., 2008). These data indicate that the change in Diap1 protein levels is due, at least in part, to decreased Yki-dependent diap1 transcription. We also found decreased expression of ban-lacZ and fj-lacZ in ed mutant clones but no change in nuclear Yki localization. These findings differ from a previous study reporting that nuclear Yki in ed clones increases Diap1 levels and expression of other Yki-target genes (Yue et al., 2012). Thus, the regulation of Yki-target genes by Ed is not easily explained by a simple effect on alterations in Hippo pathway activity.

Often, wild-type cells directly adjacent to ed clones have elevated expression of Yki-target genes and elevated Diap1 protein. In this way, these cells resemble cells with Hippo mutations pathway that behave as supercompetitors (Tyler et al., 2007). Thus, Diap1 reduction in ed mutant clones, coupled with the generation of boundary cells that have some properties of supercompetitors, could together contribute to the elimination of ed cells from the disc by apoptosis (Fig. 8A,A′).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Model summary of phenotypes caused by Echinoid loss and proposed mechanisms. (A,A′) Clones of echinoid mutant cells are eliminated from mosaic tissues. Ed-depleted cells have decreased Diap1 expression, which predisposes them to death by apoptosis, and increased apical Ft. In the wild-type neighbors bordering the ed clones, levels of Yki targets, including Diap1, bantam and four-jointed, are elevated. This may confer a competitive advantage to the wild-type neighbors, which could facilitate the elimination of ed clones from mosaic tissue (A′). (B,B′) When ed mutant tissue is abundant (e.g. in an entire organ), mutant cells persist and the resulting organs overgrow. This overgrowth is facilitated by Ilp8 secretion, which delays pupariation. Slow-growing ed mutant tissue fails to arrest at the proper final size, leading to overgrown organs (B′).

Why are ed mutant tissues overgrown?

Although ed tissue grows more slowly than wild-type tissue (likely due to elevated rates of apoptosis), it appears to grow well beyond an appropriate size. This cannot simply result from the delay in pupariation caused by Ilp8 production by ed tissue, since delaying pupariation by reducing ecdysone production still results in a growth arrest at close to the appropriate size (Parker and Struhl, 2020). Thus, Ed has a second function in arresting growth at the appropriate final size (Fig. 8B,B′).

Ed can function as an adhesion molecule. The levels of E-cadherin are known to be altered in ed mutant tissue and Ed and E-cadherin may function with some degree of redundancy to mediate cell-cell adhesion (Chang et al., 2011; Laplante and Nilson, 2006; Wei et al., 2005). The mechanisms by which tissues sense their final size and arrest their growth accordingly are still poorly understood. While growth arrest is clearly disrupted in mutants that completely disrupt apicobasal polarity (reviewed by Hariharan and Bilder, 2006), it is possible, even likely, that subtle changes in junctional components could disrupt growth arrest.

Concluding remarks

While our studies have identified two clearly separable roles of Ed in regulating tissue growth, neither function can be easily attributed to the effect of Ed on a single signaling pathway. Ed participates in, and regulates, at least two key cellular processes: adhesion at the adherens junction (Chang et al., 2011; Laplante and Nilson, 2006, 2011; Wei et al., 2005); and endocytosis and endosomal trafficking (Chan et al., 2021; Fetting et al., 2009; Ho et al., 2010; Li et al., 2015; Rawlins et al., 2003b; Yang et al., 2018). Moreover, at least based on genetic interactions, ed influences EGFR and Notch signaling, and likely has a complex interaction with outputs of the Hippo pathway, such as regulating Diap1 levels. Ed may interact with more pathways or processes than we currently appreciate, either directly or indirectly via its effects on adhesion, endomembrane trafficking or through signaling crosstalk. The collection of phenotypic abnormalities and alterations in gene expression that we observe in ed mutants likely involve a summation of alterations in multiple pathways rather than a disruptive effect on any single pathway.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fly stocks and husbandry

Unless otherwise noted, all experimental crosses were raised at 25°C on food prepared according to the recipe from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center. Drosophila melanogaster stocks used in this study include or were derived from the following: Oregon-R (‘Ore-R’, used as wild type); y w hs-FLP; act<[y+]<Gal4 UAS-GFP/SM5-TM6B, hs-FLP;; act<stop<Gal4 UAS-RFP/SM5-TM6B, TIE-DYE (Worley et al., 2013); FRT40A and FRT40A, white+ ubi-GFP (Xu and Rubin, 1993); FRT40A MARCM (Lee and Luo, 1999); eyFLP; FRT40A CL white+/CyO (BL5622); UAS-ed (Bai et al., 2001); edIF20 FRT40A, ed1x5 FRT40A and edsIH8 FRT40A (Bai et al., 2001); UAS-edFull and UAS-edΔC-GFP (Laplante and Nilson, 2011); UAS-edΔIntra-GFP (a gift from J.-C. Hsu); Yki:GFP (Fletcher et al., 2018); nub-Gal4 (AC-62, BL25754); rn-Gal4 (BL7405); hh-Gal4 (BL45169); en-Gal4 (BL25752); ban-lacZ (BL10154) (Herranz et al., 2012); fj-LacZ (fjP1, BL44253) (Brodsky and Steller, 1996); ex-lacZ (Boedigheimer and Laughon, 1993); diap1-GFP.HREx8 (Wu et al., 2008); dIlp8MI00727(BL33079); UAS-w-RNAi (BL33644); UAS-ama-RNAi (BL33416); UAS-beat-Vc-RNAi (BL60067); UAS-Cont-RNAi (BL34867); UAS-shg-RNAi (BL32904); UAS-side-VII-RNAi (V10011); UAS-ft-RNAi (BL34970); UAS-ds-RNAi (BL32964); UAS-ed-RNAi [V104279, V3087, V938 and BL38423 (‘ed-RNAi’ refers to V104279 unless otherwise indicated)]; UAS-otk2-RNAi (BL55892); and UAS-p35 (BL5073). ‘BL’ and ‘V’ indicates stocks obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC; Bloomington, IN, USA) and Vienna Drosophila Resource Center (VDRC; Vienna, Austria), respectively. Additional stocks which were included in the genetic screen but are not mentioned in the main text are listed in Table S3 with BDSC or VDRC numbers indicated.

Mosaic tissue generation

Clones induced by heat shock were generated in a 37°C water bath 48 h before dissection, unless otherwise noted. FLP-out Gal4 clones were made using heat shocks of 6 min (to generate clones at low density), 12 min (for moderately low density), 15 min (for medium density) or 30 min (for high density). MARCM clones were generated 72 h AEL using a 1 h heat shock. Mitotic recombination clones were generated at indicated time points using a 1 h heat shock. Mitotic recombination clones made in the eye were induced by expression of the eyFLP driver.

Screen

Approximately 10 UAS-RNAi males were crossed to ∼20 y, w, hs-FLP; act<[y+]<Gal4, UAS-GFP/SM5-TM6B or TIE-DYE (Act<stop<lacZ.nls, Ubi <stop<GFP.nls; Act<stop<GAL4, UAS-his2A::RFP/SM5-TM6B) virgin females. Crosses were kept on Bloomington food supplemented with yeast and flipped once daily. Clones were induced by heat shock on day 3. Early rounds of screening used a 15 min heat shock, although we later switched to a 12 min heat shock for the majority of the screen since the low clone density made identifying deviations from the control in either direction easier. Wing imaginal discs from ∼6 wandering L3 larvae per line were dissected ∼48 h after heat shock, stained with DAPI and imaged.

Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence microscopy

Imaginal discs were dissected in PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and permeabilized in 0.1% Triton in PBS. When staining discs with anti-Yorkie, the discs were instead dissected in 0.1 M NaPO4, fixed in PLP fixative (2% PFA, 0.01 M NaIO4, 0.075 M Lysine and 0.037 M NaPO4) and permeabilized in 10% NGS in Saponin+NaPO4. Primary antibody incubations were carried out overnight at 4°C. Secondary antibody incubations were carried out for 2-3 h at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Discs were mounted in SlowFade Diamond Antifade Mountant (S36963, Invitrogen).

Primary antibodies used were: rabbit anti-Ed (1:500, a gift from J.-C. Hsu) (Wei et al., 2005), rabbit anti-cleaved Dcp-1 (1:250; Cell Signaling Technology, 9578, RRID:AB_2721060), mouse anti-Diap1 (1:200, a gift from B. Hay, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA), mouse anti-β-Galactosidase (1:500, Sigma-Aldrich, WH0051083M1, RRID:AB_1841716), mouse anti-β-Galactosidase (1:500, SAB4200805, Sigma-Aldrich), chicken anti-GFP (1:500, Abcam, ab13970, RRID:AB_300798), guinea pig anti-Yorkie (1:500, I.K.H. - UC Berkeley 1798, RRID:AB_3711287), rat anti-Fat (1:400, a gift from K. Irvine, Rutgers University, NJ, USA) (Feng and Irvine, 2009), rabbit anti-pMAD (1:400, Abcam, ab52903, RRID:AB_882596) and guinea pig anti-Cic (1:300, I.K.H. - UC Berkeley 1503, RRID: AB_3711286) (Tseng et al., 2007). Secondary Alexa Fluor antibodies used were: goat anti-chicken IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (1:500; Abcam, ab150169, RRID:AB_2636803), goat anti-rat IgG Alexa Fluor 555 (1:500; Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21434, RRID:AB_2535855), goat anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 555 (1:500; Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21422, RRID:AB_2535844), goat anti-guinea pig IgG Alexa Fluor 647 (1:500; Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21450, RRID:AB_2535867) and goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 647 (1:500; Thermo Fisher Scientific, A32733, RRID:AB_2633282). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (1:1000, Cell Signaling).

Fluorescence images were taken on a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 equipped with a 20× objective (Plan-Apochromat, 20×/0.8), LED light source (Excelitas Technologies), AxioCam 506 mono camera (Zeiss) and ApoTome.2 slider for optical sectioning. Images and image stacks were acquired and optically sectioned in ZEN 2.3 software (Zeiss). Images were processed using FIJI software (Schindelin et al., 2012). Unless otherwise noted, images show a single z-plane.

Adult wing imaging and quantification

Adult wings were dissected from female flies. One wing per fly was mounted in Gary's Magic Mountant (Lawrence et al., 1986). Wings were imaged using a Keyence VHX-5000 digital microscope, using the 20-200× lens at 150×. Brightness, contrast and color tone of wing images have been adjusted on some images for improved visibility of features relevant to this study (wing shape and size).

For qualitative comparisons of wing sizes, wing images or traced silhouettes were overlaid in Microsoft PowerPoint. For quantitative comparisons of wing sizes, wings were traced and area was quantified in FIJI (Schindelin et al., 2012). Charts were generated using the ggplot2 package in Rstudio (Wickham, 2016).

Wing aspect ratios were calculated by dividing the length of proximodistal (PD) axis (measured from the posterior junction of the wing and hinge to the tip of the L3 vein) by the length of the anteroposterior (AP) axis (measured as the shortest distance from the tip of the L5 vein to the L1 margin).

Statistical analysis

P values were obtained by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD test using Astatsa freeware (https://astatsa.com). P<0.05 was considered significant. For box and whisker plots, the horizontal line is the median, the box is the interquartile range and the whiskers extend to the largest (upper whisker) or smallest (lower whisker) value that is no further from the hinge than 1.5× inter-quartile range.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary information
DOI: 10.1242/develop.204572_sup1
Table S1. Initial candidate list.
Table S2. Genes excluded from screen.
Table S3. Results from screen.

Acknowledgements

We thank current and former members of the Hariharan laboratory for helpful feedback and discussions, especially Luigi Viggiano, who conducted related experiments that influenced our thinking on this study, and Melanie Worley. We thank Zohra Allata for help with dissections and microscopy. We thank FlyBase (https://flybase.org) for invaluable curation of information. We also thank Bruce Hay, Jui-Chou Hsu, Ken Irvine, Laura Nilson, Duojia Pan, Nic Tapon, the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center, the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center and the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for reagents and fly stocks. Some data presented in this work have been previously presented in a publicly available PhD thesis (Spitzer, 2023).

Footnotes

Author contributions

Conceptualization: D.C.S., I.K.H; Data curation: D.C.S.; Formal analysis: D.C.S.; Funding acquisition: I.K.H.; Investigation: D.C.S., W.Y.S., A.R.-V.; Supervision: I.K.H.; Visualization: D.C.S.; Writing – original draft: D.C.S., I.K.H.; Writing – review & editing: D.C.S., I.K.H.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R35 GM122490 to I.K.H.) and by a pre-doctoral fellowship from the National Science Foundation (DGE 1752814 to D.C.S.). Open Access funding provided by the University of California. Deposited in PMC for immediate release.

Data and resource availability

All relevant data can be found within the article and its supplementary information.

The people behind the papers

This article has an associated ‘The people behind the papers’ interview with some of the authors.

Peer review history

The peer review history is available online at https://journals.biologists.com/dev/lookup/doi/10.1242/dev.204572.reviewer-comments.pdf

References

  1. Adachi-Yamada, T. and O'Connor, M. B. (2002). Morphogenetic apoptosis: a mechanism for correcting discontinuities in morphogen gradients. Dev. Biol. 251, 74-90. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adachi-Yamada, T., Harumoto, T., Sakurai, K., Ueda, R., Saigo, K., O'Connor, M. B. and Nakato, H. (2005). Wing-to-leg homeosis by spineless causes apoptosis regulated by FISH-lips, a novel leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 3140-3150. 10.1128/MCB.25.8.3140-3150.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmed, A., Chandra, S., Magarinos, M. and Vaessin, H. (2003). echinoid mutants exhibit neurogenic phenotypes and show synergistic interactions with the Notch signaling pathway. Development 130, 6295-6304. 10.1242/dev.00796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Akai, N., Ohsawa, S., Sando, Y. and Igaki, T. (2021). Epithelial cell-turnover ensures robust coordination of tissue growth in Drosophila ribosomal protein mutants. PLoS Genet. 17, e1009300. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alpar, L., Bergantiños, C. and Johnston, L. A. (2018). Spatially restricted regulation of Spätzle/Toll signaling during cell competition. Dev. Cell 46, 706-719.e5. 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.08.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Amoyel, M. and Bach, E. A. (2014). Cell competition: how to eliminate your neighbours. Development 141, 988-1000. 10.1242/dev.079129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bai, J.-M., Chiu, W.-H., Wang, J.-C., Tzeng, T.-H., Perrimon, N. and Hsu, J.-C. (2001). The cell adhesion molecule Echinoid defines a new pathway that antagonizes the Drosophila EGF receptor signaling pathway. Development 128, 591-601. 10.1242/dev.128.4.591 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baillon, L., Germani, F., Rockel, C., Hilchenbach, J. and Basler, K. (2018). Xrp1 is a transcription factor required for cell competition-driven elimination of loser cells. Sci. Rep. 8, 17712. 10.1038/s41598-018-36277-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Baker, N. E. (2020). Emerging mechanisms of cell competition. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 683-697. 10.1038/s41576-020-0262-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Baumgartner, M. E., Dinan, M. P., Langton, P. F., Kucinski, I. and Piddini, E. (2021). Proteotoxic stress is a driver of the loser status and cell competition. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 136-146. 10.1038/s41556-020-00627-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bennett, F. C. and Harvey, K. F. (2006). Fat cadherin modulates organ size in Drosophila via the Salvador/Warts/Hippo signaling pathway. Curr. Biol. 16, 2101-2110. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bergmann, A., Agapite, J., McCall, K. and Steller, H. (1998). The Drosophila gene hid is a direct molecular target of ras-dependent survival signaling. Cell 95, 331-341. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81765-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bielmeier, C., Alt, S., Weichselberger, V., La Fortezza, M., Harz, H., Jülicher, F., Salbreux, G. and Classen, A.-K. (2016). Interface contractility between differently fated cells drives cell elimination and cyst formation. Curr. Biol. 26, 563-574. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bilder, D., Li, M. and Perrimon, N. (2000). Cooperative regulation of cell polarity and growth by Drosophila tumor suppressors. Science 289, 113-116. 10.1126/science.289.5476.113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Boedigheimer, M. and Laughon, A. (1993). expanded: a gene involved in the control of cell proliferation in imaginal discs. Development 118, 1291-1301. 10.1242/dev.118.4.1291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brand, A. H. and Perrimon, N. (1993). Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118, 401-415. 10.1242/dev.118.2.401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brodsky, M. H. and Steller, H. (1996). Positional information along the dorsal–ventral axis of the Drosophila eye: graded expression of the four-jointed gene. Dev. Biol. 173, 428-446. 10.1006/dbio.1996.0038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Brumby, A. M. and Richardson, H. E. (2003). scribble mutants cooperate with oncogenic Ras or Notch to cause neoplastic overgrowth in Drosophila. EMBO J. 22, 5769-5779. 10.1093/emboj/cdg548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chan, E. H. Y., Zhou, Y., Aerne, B. L., Holder, M. V., Weston, A., Barry, D. J., Collinson, L. and Tapon, N. (2021). RASSF8-mediated transport of Echinoid via the exocyst promotes Drosophila wing elongation and epithelial ordering. Development 148, dev199731. 10.1242/dev.199731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chang, L.-H., Chen, P., Lien, M.-T., Ho, Y.-H., Lin, C.-M., Pan, Y.-T., Wei, S.-Y. and Hsu, J.-C. (2011). Differential adhesion and actomyosin cable collaborate to drive Echinoid-mediated cell sorting. Development 138, 3803-3812. 10.1242/dev.062257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cho, E., Feng, Y., Rauskolb, C., Maitra, S., Fehon, R. and Irvine, K. D. (2006). Delineation of a Fat tumor suppressor pathway. Nat. Genet. 38, 1142-1150. 10.1038/ng1887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Coelho, C. M. A., Kolevski, B., Bunn, C., Walker, C., Dahanukar, A. and Leevers, S. J. (2005). Growth and cell survival are unevenly impaired in pixie mutant wing discs. Development 132, 5411-5424. 10.1242/dev.02148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Colombani, J., Andersen, D. S. and Léopold, P. (2012). Secreted peptide Dilp8 coordinates Drosophila tissue growth with developmental timing. Science 336, 582-585. 10.1126/science.1216689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Conlon, I. and Raff, M. (1999). Size control in animal development. Cell 96, 235-244. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80563-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cumming, T. and Levayer, R. (2023). Toward a predictive understanding of epithelial cell death. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 156, 44-57. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2023.06.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. de Belle, J. S., Sokolowski, M. B. and Hilliker, A. J. (1993). Genetic analysis of the foraging microregion of Drosophila melanogaster. Genome 36, 94-101. 10.1139/g93-013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. de la Cova, C., Abril, M., Bellosta, P., Gallant, P. and Johnston, L. A. (2004). Drosophila Myc regulates organ size by inducing cell competition. Cell 117, 107-116. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00214-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. de Vreede, G., Gerlach, S. U. and Bilder, D. (2022). Epithelial monitoring through ligand-receptor segregation ensures malignant cell elimination. Science 376, 297-301. 10.1126/science.abl4213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Díaz-Benjumea, F. J. and García-Bellido, A. (1990). Behaviour of cells mutant for an EGF receptor homologue of Drosophila in genetic mosaics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 242, 36-44. 10.1098/rspb.1990.0100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Díaz-Benjumea, J., Gaitán, M. A. F. G. and García-Bellido, A. (1989). Developmental genetics of the wing vein pattern of Drosophila. Genome 31, 612-619. 10.1139/g89-114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ding, R., Weynans, K., Bossing, T., Barros, C. S. and Berger, C. (2016). The Hippo signalling pathway maintains quiescence in Drosophila neural stem cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 10510. 10.1038/ncomms10510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dong, J., Feldmann, G., Huang, J., Wu, S., Zhang, N., Comerford, S. A., Gayyed, M. F., Anders, R. A., Maitra, A. and Pan, D. (2007). Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell 130, 1120-1133. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Escudero, L. M., Wei, S.-Y., Chiu, W.-H., Modolell, J. and Hsu, J.-C. (2003). Echinoid synergizes with the Notch signaling pathway in Drosophila mesothorax bristle patterning. Development 130, 6305-6316. 10.1242/dev.00869 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Everetts, N. J., Worley, M. I., Yasutomi, R., Yosef, N. and Hariharan, I. K. (2021). Single-cell transcriptomics of the Drosophila wing disc reveals instructive epithelium-to-myoblast interactions. eLife 10, e61276. 10.7554/eLife.61276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Faivre-Sarrailh, C., Banerjee, S., Li, J., Hortsch, M., Laval, M. and Bhat, M. A. (2004). Drosophila contactin, a homolog of vertebrate contactin, is required for septate junction organization and paracellular barrier function. Development 131, 4931-4942. 10.1242/dev.01372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Feng, Y. and Irvine, K. D. (2009). Processing and phosphorylation of the Fat receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11989-11994. 10.1073/pnas.0811540106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Fetting, J. L., Spencer, S. A. and Wolff, T. (2009). The cell adhesion molecules Echinoid and Friend of Echinoid coordinate cell adhesion and cell signaling to regulate the fidelity of ommatidial rotation in the Drosophila eye. Development 136, 3323-3333. 10.1242/dev.038422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Finegan, T. M. and Bergstralh, D. T. (2020). Neuronal immunoglobulin superfamily cell adhesion molecules in epithelial morphogenesis: insights from Drosophila. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190553. 10.1098/rstb.2019.0553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Fischer, J. A., Giniger, E., Maniatis, T. and Ptashne, M. (1988). GAL4 activates transcription in Drosophila. Nature 332, 853-856. 10.1038/332853a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Fischer, F., Ernst, L., Frey, A., Holstein, K., Prasad, D., Weichselberger, V., Balaji, R. and Classen, A.-K. (2024). A mismatch in the expression of cell surface molecules induces tissue-intrinsic defense against aberrant cells. Curr. Biol. 34, 980-996.e6. 10.1016/j.cub.2024.01.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Fletcher, G. C., Diaz-de-la-Loza, M.-C., Borreguero-Muñoz, N., Holder, M., Aguilar-Aragon, M. and Thompson, B. J. (2018). Mechanical strain regulates the Hippo pathway in Drosophila. Development 145, dev159467. 10.1242/dev.159467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Frémion, F., Darboux, I., Diano, M., Hipeau-Jacquotte, R., Seeger, M. A. and Piovant, M. (2000). Amalgam is a ligand for the transmembrane receptor neurotactin and is required for neurotactin-mediated cell adhesion and axon fasciculation in Drosophila. EMBO J. 19, 4463-4472. 10.1093/emboj/19.17.4463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Fulford, A. D. and McNeill, H. (2020). Fat/Dachsous family cadherins in cell and tissue organisation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 62, 96-103. 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. García-Bellido, A. (2009). The cellular and genetic bases of organ size and shape in Drosophila. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 53, 1291-1303. 10.1387/ijdb.072459ag [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. García-Bellido, A., Cortés, F. and Milán, M. (1994). Cell interactions in the control of size in Drosophila wings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10222-10226. 10.1073/pnas.91.21.10222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Garelli, A., Gontijo, A. M., Miguela, V., Caparros, E. and Dominguez, M. (2012). Imaginal discs secrete insulin-like peptide 8 to mediate plasticity of growth and maturation. Science 336, 579-582. 10.1126/science.1216735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Gerlach, S. U., De Vreede, G. and Bilder, D. (2022). PTP10D-mediated cell competition is not obligately required for elimination of polarity-deficient clones. Biol. Open 11, bio059525. 10.1242/bio.059525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Grata, A. and Levayer, R. (2025). Epithelial cell extrusion at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 138, jcs263786. 10.1242/jcs.263786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hafezi, Y., Bosch, J. A. and Hariharan, I. K. (2012). Differences in levels of the transmembrane protein Crumbs can influence cell survival at clonal boundaries. Dev. Biol. 368, 358-369. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hariharan, I. K. and Bilder, D. (2006). Regulation of imaginal disc growth by tumor-suppressor genes in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40, 335-361. 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.100738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hay, B. A., Wolff, T. and Rubin, G. M. (1994). Expression of baculovirus P35 prevents cell death in Drosophila. Development 120, 2121-2129. 10.1242/dev.120.8.2121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hay, B. A., Wassarman, D. A. and Rubin, G. M. (1995). Drosophila homologs of baculovirus inhibitor of apoptosis proteins function to block cell death. Cell 83, 1253-1262. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90150-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Herranz, H., Hong, X. and Cohen, S. M. (2012). Mutual repression by bantam miRNA and capicua links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo pathways in growth control. Curr. Biol. 22, 651-657. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ho, Y.-H., Lien, M.-T., Lin, C.-M., Wei, S.-Y., Chang, L.-H. and Hsu, J.-C. (2010). Echinoid regulates Flamingo endocytosis to control ommatidial rotation in the Drosophila eye. Development 137, 745-754. 10.1242/dev.040238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Huang, J., Wu, S., Barrera, J., Matthews, K. and Pan, D. (2005). The Hippo signaling pathway coordinately regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis by inactivating yorkie, the Drosophila homolog of YAP. Cell 122, 421-434. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hynes, R. O. and Zhao, Q. (2000). The evolution of cell adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 150, F89-F96. 10.1083/jcb.150.2.F89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Igaki, T., Pastor-Pareja, J. C., Aonuma, H., Miura, M. and Xu, T. (2009). Intrinsic tumor suppression and epithelial maintenance by endocytic activation of Eiger/TNF signaling in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 16, 458-465. 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Islam, R., Wei, S.-Y., Chiu, W.-H., Hortsch, M. and Hsu, J.-C. (2003). Neuroglian activates Echinoid to antagonize the Drosophila EGF receptor signaling pathway. Development 130, 2051-2059. 10.1242/dev.00415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kumar, A. and Baker, N. E. (2022). The CRL4 E3 ligase Mahjong/DCAF1 controls cell competition through the transcription factor Xrp1, independently of polarity genes. Development 149, dev200795. 10.1242/dev.200795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kurada, P. and White, K. (1998). Ras promotes cell survival in Drosophila by downregulating hid expression. Cell 95, 319-329. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81764-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Langton, P. F., Baumgartner, M. E., Logeay, R. and Piddini, E. (2021). Xrp1 and Irbp18 trigger a feed-forward loop of proteotoxic stress to induce the loser status. PLoS Genet. 17, e1009946. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Laplante, C. and Nilson, L. A. (2006). Differential expression of the adhesion molecule Echinoid drives epithelial morphogenesis in Drosophila. Development 133, 3255-3264. 10.1242/dev.02492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Laplante, C. and Nilson, L. A. (2011). Asymmetric distribution of Echinoid defines the epidermal leading edge during Drosophila dorsal closure. J. Cell Biol. 192, 335-348. 10.1083/jcb.201009022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lawrence, P., Johnston, P. and Morata, G. (1986). Methods of marking cells. In Drosophila: A Practical Approach (ed. Roberts D. B.), pp. 229-242. Oxford, UK: IRL Press. [Google Scholar]
  65. Lee, T. and Luo, L. (1999). Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron 22, 451-461. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80701-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Lee, C.-H., Rimesso, G., Reynolds, D. M., Cai, J. and Baker, N. E. (2016). Whole-genome sequencing and iPLEX MassARRAY genotyping map an EMS-induced mutation affecting cell competition in Drosophila melanogaster. G3 6, 3207-3217. 10.1534/g3.116.029421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lee, C.-H., Kiparaki, M., Blanco, J., Folgado, V., Ji, Z., Kumar, A., Rimesso, G. and Baker, N. E. (2018). A regulatory response to ribosomal protein mutations controls translation, growth, and cell competition. Dev. Cell 46, 456-469.e4. 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.07.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. LeGoff, L. and Lecuit, T. (2016). Mechanical forces and growth in animal tissues. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, a019232. 10.1101/cshperspect.a019232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Levayer, R., Dupont, C. and Moreno, E. (2016). Tissue crowding induces caspase-dependent competition for space. Curr. Biol. 26, 670-677. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Li, Y.-C., Yang, W.-T., Cheng, L.-C., Lin, C.-M., Ho, Y.-H., Lin, P.-Y., Chen, B.-C., Rickoll, W. L. and Hsu, J.-C. (2015). Novel transport function of adherens junction revealed by live imaging in Drosophila. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 463, 686-692. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.05.125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Li, H., Watson, A., Olechwier, A., Anaya, M., Sorooshyari, S. K., Harnett, D. P., Lee, H.-K. P., Vielmetter, J., Fares, M. A., Garcia, K. C.et al. (2017). Deconstruction of the beaten Path-Sidestep interaction network provides insights into neuromuscular system development. eLife 6, e28111. 10.7554/eLife.28111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Lin, H.-P., Chen, H.-M., Wei, S.-Y., Chen, L.-Y., Chang, L.-H., Sun, Y.-J., Huang, S.-Y. and Hsu, J.-C. (2007). Cell adhesion molecule Echinoid associates with unconventional myosin VI/Jaguar motor to regulate cell morphology during dorsal closure in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 311, 423-433. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.08.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Linnemannstöns, K., Ripp, C., Honemann-Capito, M., Brechtel-Curth, K., Hedderich, M. and Wodarz, A. (2014). The PTK7-related transmembrane proteins off-track and off-track 2 are co-receptors for Drosophila Wnt2 required for male fertility. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004443. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Lloyd, A. C. (2013). The regulation of cell size. Cell 154, 1194-1205. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Ly, P. T., Tan, Y. S., Koe, C. T., Zhang, Y., Xie, G., Endow, S., Deng, W.-M., Yu, F. and Wang, H. (2019). CRL4Mahj E3 ubiquitin ligase promotes neural stem cell reactivation. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000276. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Mao, Y., Tournier, A. L., Hoppe, A., Kester, L., Thompson, B. J. and Tapon, N. (2013). Differential proliferation rates generate patterns of mechanical tension that orient tissue growth. EMBO J. 32, 2790-2803. 10.1038/emboj.2013.197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Marinari, E., Mehonic, A., Curran, S., Gale, J., Duke, T. and Baum, B. (2012). Live-cell delamination counterbalances epithelial growth to limit tissue overcrowding. Nature 484, 542-545. 10.1038/nature10984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Martín, F. A., Herrera, S. C. and Morata, G. (2009). Cell competition, growth and size control in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc. Development 136, 3747-3756. 10.1242/dev.038406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Marygold, S. J., Roote, J., Reuter, G., Lambertsson, A., Ashburner, M., Millburn, G. H., Harrison, P. M., Yu, Z., Kenmochi, N., Kaufman, T. C.et al. (2007). The ribosomal protein genes and Minute loci of Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biol. 8, R216. 10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Matakatsu, H. and Blair, S. S. (2012). Separating planar cell polarity and Hippo pathway activities of the protocadherins Fat and Dachsous. Development 139, 1498-1508. 10.1242/dev.070367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Matamoro-Vidal, A. and Levayer, R. (2019). Multiple influences of mechanical forces on cell competition. Curr. Biol. 29, R762-R774. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Morata, G. and Ripoll, P. (1975). Minutes: mutants of Drosophila autonomously affecting cell division rate. Dev. Biol. 42, 211-221. 10.1016/0012-1606(75)90330-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Moreno, E. and Basler, K. (2004). dMyc transforms cells into super-competitors. Cell 117, 13. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00262-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Moucaud, B., Prince, E., Ragot, E., Renaud, Y., Jagla, K., Junion, G. and Soler, C. (2024). Amalgam plays a dual role in controlling the number of leg muscle progenitors and regulating their interactions with the developing Drosophila tendon. PLoS Biol. 22, e3002842. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Nagata, R. and Igaki, T. (2018). Cell competition: emerging mechanisms to eliminate neighbors. Dev. Growth Differ. 60, 522-530. 10.1111/dgd.12575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Neto-Silva, R. M., De Beco, S. and Johnston, L. A. (2010). Evidence for a growth-stabilizing regulatory feedback mechanism between Myc and Yorkie, the Drosophila homolog of yap. Dev. Cell 19, 507-520. 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.09.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Oda, H., Uemura, T., Harada, Y., Iwai, Y. and Takeichi, M. (1994). A Drosophila homolog of cadherin associated with Armadillo and essential for embryonic cell-cell adhesion. Dev. Biol. 165, 716-726. 10.1006/dbio.1994.1287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Parker, J. and Struhl, G. (2020). Control of Drosophila wing size by morphogen range and hormonal gating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 31935-31944. 10.1073/pnas.2018196117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Pignoni, F. and Zipursky, S. L. (1997). Induction of Drosophila eye development by decapentaplegic. Development 124, 271-278. 10.1242/dev.124.2.271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Prasad, D., Illek, K., Fischer, F., Holstein, K. and Classen, A.-K. (2023). Bilateral JNK activation is a hallmark of interface surveillance and promotes elimination of aberrant cells. eLife 12, e80809. 10.7554/eLife.80809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Rawlins, E. L., White, N. M. and Jarman, A. P. (2003a). Echinoid limits R8 photoreceptor specification by inhibiting inappropriate EGF receptor signalling within R8 equivalence groups. Development 130, 3715-3724. 10.1242/dev.00602 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Rawlins, E. L., Lovegrove, B. and Jarman, A. P. (2003b). Echinoid facilitates Notch pathway signalling during Drosophila neurogenesis through functional interaction with Delta. Development 130, 6475-6484. 10.1242/dev.00882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Recasens-Alvarez, C., Alexandre, C., Kirkpatrick, J., Nojima, H., Huels, D. J., Snijders, A. P. and Vincent, J.-P. (2021). Ribosomopathy-associated mutations cause proteotoxic stress that is alleviated by TOR inhibition. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 127-135. 10.1038/s41556-020-00626-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Rhiner, C., López-Gay, J. M., Soldini, D., Casas-Tinto, S., Martín, F. A., Lombardía, L. and Moreno, E. (2010). Flower forms an extracellular code that reveals the fitness of a cell to its neighbors in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 18, 985-998. 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Rodrigues, A. B., Zoranovic, T., Ayala-Camargo, A., Grewal, S., Reyes-Robles, T., Krasny, M., Wu, D. C., Johnston, L. A. and Bach, E. A. (2012). Activated STAT regulates growth and induces competitive interactions independently of Myc, Yorkie, Wingless and ribosome biogenesis. Development 139, 4051-4061. 10.1242/dev.076760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B.et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676-682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Shraiman, B. I. (2005). Mechanical feedback as a possible regulator of tissue growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3318-3323. 10.1073/pnas.0404782102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Silva, E., Tsatskis, Y., Gardano, L., Tapon, N. and McNeill, H. (2006). The tumor-suppressor gene fat controls tissue growth upstream of expanded in the Hippo signaling pathway. Curr. Biol. 16, 2081-2089. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Song, Z., McCall, K. and Steller, H. (1997). DCP-1, a Drosophila cell death protease essential for development. Science 275, 536-540. 10.1126/science.275.5299.536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Spencer, S. A. and Cagan, R. L. (2003). Echinoid is essential for regulation of Egfr signaling and R8 formation during Drosophila eye development. Development 130, 3725-3733. 10.1242/dev.00605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Spitzer, D. C. (2023). Context-dependent regulation of epithelial growth by Echinoid. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA. [Google Scholar]
  102. Steinberg, M. S. (1963). Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells. Science 141, 401-408. 10.1126/science.141.3579.401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Swan, L. E., Schmidt, M., Schwarz, T., Ponimaskin, E., Prange, U., Boeckers, T., Thomas, U. and Sigrist, S. J. (2006). Complex interaction of Drosophila GRIP PDZ domains and Echinoid during muscle morphogenesis. EMBO J. 25, 3640-3651. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Tamori, Y., Bialucha, C. U., Tian, A.-G., Kajita, M., Huang, Y.-C., Norman, M., Harrison, N., Poulton, J., Ivanovitch, K., Disch, L.et al. (2010). Involvement of Lgl and Mahjong/VprBP in cell competition. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000422. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Tapon, N., Harvey, K. F., Bell, D. W., Wahrer, D. C. R., Schiripo, T. A., Haber, D. A. and Hariharan, I. K. (2002). salvador promotes both cell cycle exit and apoptosis in Drosophila and is mutated in human cancer cell lines. Cell 110, 467-478. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00824-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Tepass, U., Gruszynski-DeFeo, E., Haag, T. A., Omatyar, L., Török, T. and Hartenstein, V. (1996). shotgun encodes Drosophila E-cadherin and is preferentially required during cell rearrangement in the neurectoderm and other morphogenetically active epithelia. Genes Dev. 10, 672-685. 10.1101/gad.10.6.672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Thomas, C. and Strutt, D. (2012). The roles of the cadherins Fat and Dachsous in planar polarity specification in Drosophila: Fat/Dachsous and Planar Polarity. Dev. Dyn. 241, 27-39. 10.1002/dvdy.22736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Townes, P. L. and Holtfreter, J. (1955). Directed movements and selective adhesion of embryonic amphibian cells. J. Exp. Zool. 128, 53-120. 10.1002/jez.1401280105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Tseng, A.-S. K., Tapon, N., Kanda, H., Cigizoglu, S., Edelmann, L., Pellock, B., White, K. and Hariharan, I. K. (2007). Capicua regulates cell proliferation downstream of the receptor tyrosine Kinase/Ras signaling pathway. Curr. Biol. 17, 728-733. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Tyler, D. M., Li, W., Zhuo, N., Pellock, B. and Baker, N. E. (2007). Genes affecting cell competition in Drosophila. Genetics 175, 643-657. 10.1534/genetics.106.061929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Vincent, J.-P., Kolahgar, G., Gagliardi, M. and Piddini, E. (2011). Steep differences in wingless signaling trigger Myc-independent competitive cell interactions. Dev. Cell 21, 366-374. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.06.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Vogel, C., Teichmann, S. A. and Chothia, C. (2003). The immunoglobulin superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans and the evolution of complexity. Development 130, 6317-6328. 10.1242/dev.00848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Wei, S.-Y., Escudero, L. M., Yu, F., Chang, L.-H., Chen, L.-Y., Ho, Y.-H., Lin, C.-M., Chou, C.-S., Chia, W., Modolell, J.et al. (2005). Echinoid is a component of adherens junctions that cooperates with DE-cadherin to mediate cell adhesion. Dev. Cell 8, 493-504. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Wickham, H. (2016). Programming with ggplot2. In ggplot2. Use R!. Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_12 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  115. Willecke, M., Hamaratoglu, F., Kango-Singh, M., Udan, R., Chen, C., Tao, C., Zhang, X. and Halder, G. (2006). The fat cadherin acts through the Hippo tumor-suppressor pathway to regulate tissue size. Curr. Biol. 16, 2090-2100. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Willecke, M., Hamaratoglu, F., Sansores-Garcia, L., Tao, C. and Halder, G. (2008). Boundaries of Dachsous Cadherin activity modulate the Hippo signaling pathway to induce cell proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14897-14902. 10.1073/pnas.0805201105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Worley, M. I., Setiawan, L. and Hariharan, I. K. (2013). TIE-DYE: a combinatorial marking system to visualize and genetically manipulate clones during development in Drosophila melanogaster. Development 140, 3275-3284. 10.1242/dev.096057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Wu, S., Huang, J., Dong, J. and Pan, D. (2003). hippo encodes a ste-20 family protein kinase that restricts cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis in conjunction with salvador and warts. Cell 114, 445-456. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00549-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Wu, S., Liu, Y., Zheng, Y., Dong, J. and Pan, D. (2008). The TEAD/TEF family protein scalloped mediates transcriptional output of the Hippo growth-regulatory pathway. Dev. Cell 14, 388-398. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Xu, T. and Rubin, G. M. (1993). Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues. Development 117, 1223-1237. 10.1242/dev.117.4.1223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Yamamoto, M., Ohsawa, S., Kunimasa, K. and Igaki, T. (2017). The ligand Sas and its receptor PTP10D drive tumour-suppressive cell competition. Nature 542, 246-250. 10.1038/nature21033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Yang, W.-T., Li, Y.-C., Lin, C.-M., Tang, W.-C., Chen, B.-C., Suzuki, E. and Hsu, J.-C. (2018). Adherens junction-associated pores mediate the intercellular transport of endosomes and cytoplasmic proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 505, 664-670. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.09.129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Yue, T., Tian, A. and Jiang, J. (2012). The cell adhesion molecule Echinoid functions as a tumor suppressor and upstream regulator of the Hippo signaling pathway. Dev. Cell 22, 255-267. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information
DOI: 10.1242/develop.204572_sup1
Table S1. Initial candidate list.
Table S2. Genes excluded from screen.
Table S3. Results from screen.

Articles from Development (Cambridge, England) are provided here courtesy of Company of Biologists

RESOURCES