Abbreviations
- AVB
atrioventricular block
- AVNRT
atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
Dear Editor,
The article by Tachibana et al. [1] presents a comparative analysis of cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the context of the incidence of atrioventricular block (AVB) during slow pathway modification for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The attempt to compare the safety dynamics of the two ablation techniques is appreciable, particularly in the context of preserving AV nodal function, which is one of the major concerns in the treatment of AVNRT.
However, some methodological and interpretive aspects need to be explained further. Firstly, while the study reports a significantly higher incidence of transient AVB in the cryoablation group (24.1% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.01), the authors state that cryoablation is safer due to its reversibility and the gradual development of AV conduction issues. However, the high rate of AVB events in the cryoablation group is a concern regarding procedural stability and real‐time safety during the ablation procedures undertaken in proximity to the compact atrioventricular node, particularly in those with smaller Koch's triangles [2].
Second, although the later onset of atrioventricular block (AVB) following cryoablation (mean to AVB 6.6 ± 3.7 s) compared with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (1.2 ± 0.3 s) is an intriguing observation, it is not clearly indicated how such a finding relates in particular to effective risk reduction or improved operator response. Although the potential for earlier detection to be beneficial with delayed evolution is attractive, unless supported by active procedural monitoring strategies, this benefit remains theoretical [3].
Third, AVNRT recurrence was more prevalent in the cryo group (9.5% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.01) and challenges the precept of cryoablation's long‐term effectiveness. The recurrence could be due to both lesion longevity and operator familiarity with ablation near the His bundle. The greater number of lesions ablated above the CS ostium in the cryo group lends support to this issue but is not addressed in detail. In addition, the research lacks adequate commentary on patient anatomy, lesion depth, or cooling dynamics, all of which are critical in the interpretation of energy delivery strategy results. Previous research has associated suboptimal cryo lesion formation with higher recurrence rates, especially in cases with delayed cooling or shallow lesion depth, issues that were not explored in this study.
Lastly, even though cryoablation showed no instances of permanent AVB in this cohort, the brief follow‐up (median 221 days) and small sample size rule out conclusions about long‐term AV nodal safety. Since certain AV nodal injuries may be delayed in presentation, longer follow‐up and larger prospective trials would be required to confirm these results.
In conclusion, although the study indicates potential procedural safety of cryoablation in preventing permanent AVB, its increased transient AVB rates and AVNRT recurrence indicate that modality selection will still have to be individualized. Balanced interpretation, including procedural accuracy, risk of recurrence, and anatomy, is necessary in choosing ablation strategies for AVNRT.
Ethics Statement
The authors have nothing to report.
Consent
The authors have nothing to report.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Linked Articles
This article is linked to https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70072.
Acknowledgments
The authors have nothing to report.
Ahmed Z., Naz F., Umar M., Ali S. I., and Laique F., “Revisiting Cryoablation for AVNRT: A Commentary on Safety, Recurrence, and Clinical Implications,” Journal of Arrhythmia 41, no. 4 (2025): e70170, 10.1002/joa3.70170.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
All Authors contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Syed Ibad Ali, Email: syedmuhammadibadali@gmail.com.
Fatima Laique, Email: fatimalaique6@gmail.com.
Data Availability Statement
The authors have nothing to report.
References
- 1. Tachibana S., Asakawa T., Sagawa Y., et al., “Characteristics of Atrioventricular Block During Slow Pathway Ablation for Atrioventricular Nodal Re‐Entrant Tachycardia: A Comparative Study of Cryoablation and Radiofrequency Ablation,” Journal of Arrhythmia 41 (2025): e70072, 10.1002/joa3.70072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Skanes A. C., Dubuc M., Klein G. J., et al., “Cryothermal Ablation of the Slow Pathway for the Elimination of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia,” Circulation 102, no. 23 (2000): 2856–2860, 10.1161/01.cir.102.23.2856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Moore J. P., Shannon K. M., Fish F. A., et al., “Catheter Ablation of Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmia After Extracardiac Fontan Surgery,” Heart Rhythm 13, no. 9 (2016): 1891–1897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The authors have nothing to report.