Skip to main content
ZooKeys logoLink to ZooKeys
. 2025 Aug 18;1249:93–135. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1249.143635

A new distinctive lineage of Helix (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora, Helicidae), with a guide to Helix species from mainland Greece

Ondřej Korábek 1,, Petr Dolejš 2, Radovan Coufal 3, Lucie Juřičková 1, Kateřina Kubíková 1, Bernhard Hausdorf 4,5
PMCID: PMC12378413  PMID: 40873528

Abstract

Greece is home to numerous endemic land snail species, sometimes with highly restricted distributions. Several species of Helix, representing all three subgenera, live there. Although the genus was taxonomically revised in 2014, there remained some open questions and the distribution ranges of individual species are still incompletely known. The discovery of a new, narrowly endemic subspecies, Helixpelagonesicathembones Korábek, Juřičková & Hausdorf, subsp. nov., is reported from the hills bordering the Thessalian Plain in the west. It was previously confused with Helixschlaeflii, but it was found that H.schlaeflii does not occur as far east as previously thought. Notably, the isolated populations from the tip of the Sithonia peninsula (Chalkidiki) that had previously been identified as H.schlaeflii also turned out to be related to H.pelagonesica. Although a divergent mitochondrial lineage was found there, morphological differences limited only to a different shell shape and lack of geographic separation led us to classify these populations as a form of H.pelagonesicapelagonesica. In addition, Helixstraminea is reported from Greece for the first time, with a population located near Kalambaka. All the Helix species from mainland Greece are illustrated and accompanied by descriptions to facilitate their recognition and maps of their distribution are provided.

Key words: Balkans, distributions, diversity, endemics, land snail, phylogeny, species identification, taxonomy

Introduction

The distribution of species diversity is uneven as the diversity generally increases towards the equator. Considering the distribution of European land snail diversity (Welter-Schultes 2012), we may recognize four largely latitudinal, geographically overlapping zones. The very north of Europe (taiga and tundra) is home to a depauperate fauna composed only of tiny species adapted to cold conditions that have very large distribution ranges (e.g. Schenková and Horsák 2013; Horsáková et al. 2019; Horsák et al. 2022). The temperate zone, at intermediate latitudes north of the Pyrenees, Alps and Carpathians, is home to often locally species-rich faunas consisting mostly of species that had to colonise these areas from glacial refugia and thus also often have rather large ranges (Hausdorf and Hennig 2003). Slightly further south is a zone of these glacial refugia, which already contains some endemic species (e.g. Cameron et al. 2016; Korábek et al. 2023b; Adamcová et al. 2024). The southernmost zone hosts, especially in the areas under the Mediterranean climatic regime, a high diversity of regional endemics (e.g. Cadevall and Orozco 2016; Cameron et al. 2023). The diversification there has a long history, resulting in not only endemic species, but even endemic genera (Welter-Schultes 2012). Furthermore, it is here in the south of Europe, where we may expect to find species with the smallest ranges, because of spatial heterogeneity and less severe extinctions due to a relatively lower impact of the glacial cycles. Indeed, some lineages differentiated on a very fine geographic scale (e.g. Mason et al. 2020).

The south of Europe consists of three peninsulas that differ in diversity and phylogenetic composition of their land snail faunas. The Balkans is the largest and most species-rich, followed by the Iberian Peninsula; the Apennine Peninsula has a relatively low diversity of land snails. In the Balkans, the diversity of land snails concentrates to the mountainous western part of the peninsula, culminating in an area roughly from Montenegro to Greece. Complex topography of the area and abundance of limestones created plenty of opportunities for the diversification of land snails, and the south of the Balkans, in particular Greece, also provided refugia allowing for the survival of relict lineages (as in Phaedusinae; Reischütz et al. 2016).

The diversity in Greece is high and only few groups have been investigated with genetic data. Therefore, there is a need for comprehensive taxonomic revisions employing modern genetic methods in many genera to clarify species limits. There may also still remain undescribed forms, if they have small ranges and/or cryptic lifestyle, and if they occur far from popular holiday destinations.

The diversity of the genus Helix Linnaeus, 1758 appears to be rather well documented. A morphology-based revision of the genus was published more than ten years ago (Neubert 2014), and Korábek et al. (2022) added an overview of the intraspecific mitochondrial diversity of most species. The exploration of the diversity of the genus in Greece would thus seem to be a done job. However, the sampling effort was geographically uneven and if there are extremely narrowly distributed lineages, they still might have escaped discovery, or at least a proper taxonomic treatment.

A new mitochondrial lineage of Helix, so divergent that it may represent an unknown species, has recently been recognized by sequencing of museum samples previously identified as Helixschlaeflii Mousson, 1859. One individual from western Thessaly yielded a sequence related to Helixpelagonesica (Rolle, 1898) (Korábek et al. 2022: fig. S59). That individual originated from the eastern margin of the presumed distribution range of H.schlaeflii. Although phylogenetically close to H.pelagonesica, the shell of the individual in question was different in shape and colouration from that species. This suggests that there is an as yet unknown lineage distinct from both H.schlaeflii and H.pelagonesica. But with only a single preserved individual and a handful of bleached shells, a proper assessment was not possible (this individual was referred to as H.pelagonesica by Korábek et al. 2022).

Due to this finding of a new lineage and the general scarcity of information on the distribution of Helix species in western Thessaly and the immediately adjacent regions, we decided to revise the eastern-most records of H.schlaeflii as reported by Neubert (2014: fig. 226). Three such sites were located in Thessaly (central Greece): Mouzaki, Morfovouni (the latter is the sampling site of the aforementioned sample) at the western margin of the Plain of Thessaly, and Loutropigi in the mountainous southwest of the region. Additionally, one site, Kastania near Servia, was in the south of West Macedonia (northern Greece). Beside this, we also revised records of H.schlaeflii from an isolated area at the southern tip of Sithonia, the middle “finger” of the Chalkidiki peninsula (northeastern Greece). These were presumably the eastern-most occurrences of the species.

As a result of the revisions, we describe a new, narrowly distributed subspecies of H.pelagonesica and provide an updated guide to the Helix species of the Greek mainland.

Materials and methods

Materials

This study is based on material collected in 2023 and stored in the Národní muzeum, Praha, Czechia and on data collected during our previous studies on Helix (e.g. Korábek et al. 2015), which included the examination of major museum collections (including the relevant type material, see Neubert 2014) and extensive fieldwork. The sources of re-used sequence data are listed in Suppl. material 1.

Molecular phylogenetic analysis

For phylogenetic analyses we used sequences of fragments of three mitochondrial genes, the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1), 16S rRNA (rrnL) and 12S rRNA (rrnS). The fragments defined by the primers LCO1490+HCO2198 (cox1; as modified by Hausdorf et al. 2003), 16Scs1+16Scs2 (rrnL; Chiba 1999) and 12SGast_fwd2+12SGast_rev3 (rrnS; Cadahía et al. 2014) were sequenced in both directions. We sequenced samples from the alleged eastern-most localities of Helixschlaeflii and representative individuals of H.schlaeflii and two other Greek Helix species. In total, 12 samples were newly sequenced for this study.

Total genomic DNA was extracted from tissue samples following a slightly modified version of the protocol of Sokolov (2000) as detailed by Scheel and Hausdorf (2012). Parts of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (cox1), the 16S and the 12S rDNA were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primer pairs LCO1490 plus HCO2198 (Folmer et al. 1994) for cox1, 12Sam plus 12Sbm (Hausdorf et al. 2003) and 16Scs1 plus 16Scs2 (Chiba 1999) for 12S and 16S rDNA, respectively. Amplifications were performed in 25 μl volumes containing 2.5 μl 10× DreamTaq Green Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 1 μl dNTP mix (5 mM each, biolabproducts, Bebensee, Germany), 1 μl of each primer (10 μM), 0.2 μl DreamTaq DNA polymerase (5 U/μl; Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.5 μl template DNA and 19.8 μl ultrapure H2O. The reaction conditions were 95 °C for 2 min, 35 PCR cycles 95 °C for 30 s, 48 °C (cox1, 16S rDNA) or 58 °C (12S rDNA) for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min, followed by a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min. Both strands of the amplified products were sequenced at Macrogen Europe (Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

In order to illustrate the phylogenetic placement of the analysed individuals, we combined the data generated here with available Helix sequences (Korábek et al. 2022) from mainland Greece and the neighbouring countries (Bulgaria, North Macedonia, and Albania; only species occurring also in Greece were included from those three countries). We used the three species of Maltzanella Hesse, 1917 (M.dickhauti (Kobelt, 1903), M.maltzani (Kobelt, 1883), M.escherichi (Boettger, 1898)) as an outgroup. The samples used are listed in Suppl. material 1 with the respective locality and voucher data and GenBank accession numbers.

Sequences were aligned with MAFFT 7.520 (Katoh and Standley 2013; --genafpair option). We performed partitioned Maximum likelihood analysis with IQ-TREE 2.3.6 (Minh et al. 2020). We partitioned the alignment into two rRNA genes and three codon positions of the cox1 and selected substitution models with ModelFinder (part of IQ-TREE; Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017). We ran the tree search ten times and assessed the support for the tree with the best likelihood by 500 bootstraps.

Morphological examination

Observations on anatomy of genital system of representatives of the H.pelagonesica clade were done on five individuals from Morfovouni, two individuals from the tip of Sithonia, and three individuals of typical H.pelagonesica from Nikiti (at the base of the Sithonia, Chalkidiki Peninsula). Neubert (2014: fig. 179) examined the genital system of a typical H.pelagonesica from the tip of Sithonia (Porto Koufo, ca 1200 m from where we sampled, mtDNA sequence included here). Measurements were performed on ethanol-preserved material in a Petri dish placed on a millimetre paper after gently stretching the measured parts of the genitalia.

We performed shell measurements to compare the three main lineages within the H.pelagonesica clade (typical H.pelagonesica, the one from Morfovouni and Mouzaki, and the lineage from the tip of Sithonia). With a calliper, we measured the shell diameter and height, the diameter of aperture (from the columellar margin to the insertion) and the diameter of protoconch at 1 whorl as counted by Kerney and Cameron (1979). In total, we measured 14 shells of the typical H.pelagonesica from two localities (Nikiti, Pigi), six shells from the tip of Sithonia, and 31 shells from Mouzaki and Morfovouni. The diameter of protoconch was measured to the nearest tenth of millimetre (but the repeatability was low, because finding a line perpendicular to the beginning of the suture is difficult), the other three measurements were rounded to the nearest millimetre. See Fig. 1 for a scheme of the measurements.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Scheme of the shell measurements taken on the shells of snails from the Helixpelagonesica clade.

We performed a principal component analysis (PCA) on the data. We used the shell diameter to normalise the shell height and aperture diameter to size, which would otherwise dominate the first axis. The PCA was done in R 4.4 (stats:prcomp(x, center = TRUE, scale. = TRUE)) and visualised with the package ‘ggbiplot’ (Vu et al. 2024).

Collection abbreviations

ZMBMuseum für Naturkunde Berlin, Germany;

ZMHZoological Museum Hamburg, Germany;

NMBENaturhistorisches Museum der Burgergemeinde Bern, Switzerland;

NMP Národní muzeum, Praha, Czechia.

Results

New records and phylogenetic analysis

We could not confirm the presence of H.schlaeflii at any of the sites of its presumed eastern-most occurrences in Thessaly and Western Macedonia we visited (Neubert 2014; see Introduction). In the vicinity of Servia (including a site near Kastania), we only found Helixphilibinensis Rossmässler, 1839. However, the shells that Neubert (2014) referred to (NMBE 524741/2) and that should originate from Kastania are indeed H.schlaeflii. In Loutropigi, the only species we found was Helixborealis Mousson, 1859. Neubert’s material from this locality was not found. The sites in Morfovouni and Mouzaki are inhabited by the same form, which is the one previously sequenced and found to be related to H.pelagonesica. It is described here as a new subspecies, H.pelagonesicathembones. The snails from the tip of Sithonia were quite similar to the contrastingly coloured variant of H.schlaeflii from Corfu. However, their colouration was even more similar to (in fact indistinguishable from) H.pelagonesica, which also occurs on Sithonia and reaches near the tip (to Porto Koufo, which is only about a kilometre away; Neubert 2014; Korábek et al. 2015). The individual depicted in Neubert (2014: fig. 224) has unusually contrasting bands, the other material he cited is more similar to our samples. The main shell difference between the snails from the tip of Sithonia and H.pelagonesica is shape (higher whorls and thus also aperture, columella pointing more downwards), but this difference is not equally strong in all individuals.

The specimens from Krionéri in Aetolia-Acarnania (NMBE 524210), supposedly the southern-most locality of H.schlaeflii, have been found to be weathered H.borealis, based on the shape of the columellar triangle and the size of the protoconch. We did not visit that locality. Besides revisiting the identity of the species occurring at the localities mentioned above, we found Helixstraminea Briganti, 1825 near Kalambaka, a species occurring in Albania but as yet not reported from Greece. We also extended the area from where Helixthessalica Boettger, 1886 is known in Greece westward by confirming its presence near Livadia in the massif of Mount Paiko/Pajak in the north of the country.

Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial sequences (Fig. 2) placed the samples of H.philibinensis from Servia and H.borealis from Loutropigi to already known clades in agreement with their geographic origin. The H.thessalica sample from Mount Paiko turned out to be a new major intraspecific lineage, additional to those reported by Korábek et al. (2022) and included in Fig. 2. In the case of the H.straminea sample, the recovered sequence did not match the species identity and belonged to a clade characteristic for Albanian H.schlaeflii. However, this mitochondrial lineage was already recorded from H.straminea before in Albania (Orenjë near Librazhd; Korábek et al. 2022: fig. S38) and the identification of the species based on shell characters is unambiguous.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Phylogenetic relationships of the newly analysed Helix samples from Greece (in bold). Maximum likelihood tree based on concatenated mitochondrial nucleotide sequences of partial cox1, rrnL, and rrnS genes. Support values are bootstrap percentages from 500 pseudoreplicates. Branches with bootstrap support <75% are dashed. The tree is rooted with Maltzanella Hesse, 1917; the outgroup is not shown.

The samples from Mouzaki and Morfovouni yielded sequences nearly identical to the previously analysed sample from the latter locality. They form a branch sister to typical H.pelagonesica. This clade is then sister to a new mitochondrial lineage recovered from the sample from the tip of Sithonia.

Shell shape differentiation within the clade of H.pelagonesica

Of the three lineages, typical H.pelagonesica is characterised by shells with a more triangular outline from the frontal view (Figs 3, 4), in contrast to a more globular shape in the other two (in particular that from Morfovouni and Mouzaki). This is because the columellar margin of the aperture is more oblique than in the other two (especially than the form from the tip of Sithonia) and the body whorl and aperture are lower relative to the shell height. The diameter of the protoconch and the relative height of the shell and relative size of the aperture tend to be smaller in the examined typical H.pelagonesica (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Principal component analysis of the variation in shell height, aperture diameter and protoconch size among typical Helixpelagonesica and the two related lineages (all normalised with respect to the diameter, thus removing the effect of shell size).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Shells of typical Helix (Helix) p. pelagonesica. A. Greece, Central Macedonia, Pigi; 41.0148°N, 22.4865°E; NMP P6M 42928; B. Greece, Central Macedonia, Nikiti; 40.2058°N, 23.6975°E; NMP P6M 42932). Photo R. Coufal. Scale bar: 2 cm.

Systematics and a guide to mainland Greek Helix

Family. Helicidae

Rafinesque, 1815

16294ED5-87C7-5DD4-B93A-9695E52F01FC

References.

Schileyko 1978; Nordsieck 1987; Razkin et al. 2015.

Type genus.

Helix Linnaeus, 1758

Subfamily. Helicinae

Rafinesque, 1815

E8F21491-9FE6-5BA7-9929-E5A2E592E57D

References.

Hesse 1918; Schileyko 1978; Razkin et al. 2015.

Tribe. Helicini

Rafinesque, 1815

2F68F9EC-1CB5-5F17-843C-7750C5221C0B

References.

Razkin et al. 2015; Neiber et al. 2022.

Genus. Helix

Linnaeus, 1758

3663380B-9586-5A60-9440-9C18574CBF31

References.

Hesse 1908; Giusti et al. 1995; Neubert and Bank 2006; Korábek and Hausdorf 2023).

Type species.

Helixpomatia Linnaeus, 1758, by subsequent designation (de Montfort 1810: 231).

Subgenus. Helix

Linnaeus, 1758

285A409F-94F1-5D17-A9B9-89E5D43AC2AD

References.

Hesse 1908; Neubert 2014; Korábek and Hausdorf 2023.

. Helix (Helix) pelagonesicapelagonesica

(Rolle, 1898)

393122E9-46E4-5C2F-8F51-AFF7F91040D8

Figs 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Helix (Helix) p. pelagonesica (Greece, Central Macedonia, Petra Olympou; 40.1803°N, 22.3286°E; SMF 342487). Photo O. Korábek.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Genital system of Helix (Helix) p. pelagonesica (Greece, Central Macedonia, Nikiti; 40.2058°N, 23.6975°E; NMP P6M 42932). Abbreviations: ag = albumen gland; bc = bursa copulatrix; dpd = distal pedunculus; ds = dart sac; dv = diverticulum; fl = flagellum; go = genital opening (not visible); hd = hermaphroditic duct; mg = mucous glands; pn+dep = penis + distal epiphallus; pep = proximal epiphallus; ppd = proximal pedunculus; pr = penial retractor muscle; so = spermoviduct; vd = vas deferens.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Shells of Helix (Helix) p. pelagonesica from the tip of Sithonia (Greece, Central Macedonia, Toroni; 39.9476°N, 23.9321°E; NMP P6M 42933). A few weathered shells were collected at the site as well, some showing even greater height-to-diameter ratio. Photo R. Coufal. Scale bar: 2 cm.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Helix (Helix) p. pelagonesica from the tip of Sithonia (Greece, Central Macedonia, Toroni; 39.9476°N, 23.9321°E; NMP P6M 42933). Photo R. Coufal.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Genital system of Helix (Helix) p. pelagonesica from the tip of Sithonia (Greece, Central Macedonia, Toroni; 39.9476°N, 23.9321°E; NMP P6M 42933). Abbreviations: ag = albumen gland; bc = bursa copulatrix; dpd = distal pedunculus; ds = dart sac; dv = diverticulum; fl = flagellum; go = genital opening (not visible); hd = hermaphroditic duct; mg = mucous glands; pn+dep = penis + distal epiphallus; pep = proximal epiphallus; ppd = proximal pedunculus; pr = penial retractor muscle; so = spermoviduct; vd = vas deferens.

References.

Neubert 2014; Korábek et al. 2022.

Description.

Shell (Fig. 4) middle-sized, conical with relatively flat base; individual whorls low and tightly coiled; deep suture giving the shell a stepped look; umbilicus fully covered or there is very narrow slit between the shell bottom and the reflected columellar margin of the aperture; protoconch large, making the apex blunt; aperture small and low, with oblique columella; aperture margins and the parietal area dark brown with purple hue; shell surface usually with fine ribs, pale brown, but often corroded even in live individuals; four bands typically present (because 2+3 fuse), brown with reddish or purple tones; bands interrupted by fine growth lines and lightly coloured ribs; aperture margins straight, columellar margin thickened, margins and the parietal area dark purple-brown. Animal grey (Fig. 5).

Distribution and habitat.

It has a small range (Fig. 10), within which it occurs sporadically, even though it can be locally abundant. In the north, it was found in the hills on both sides of the valley of Vardar/Axios (Kilkis Regional Unit), e.g. west of Polykastro or near the Dojran Lake. The northernmost record is from northeast of Negotino in North Macedonia. To the south, H.p.pelagonesica is distributed over Chalkidiki, additional populations are known from foothills of Mount Olympus and from Pelion near Volos (in Makrinitsa). The type locality is the island of Kyra Panagia (Pelagonisi) in the Northern Sporades. The characteristic habitat is a loose shrub with Quercus (Q.coccifera or similar species) and Paliurusspina-christi. It seems to rest relatively frequently on branches of shrubs.

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Approximate distribution of Helix (Helix) p. pelagonesica. Black dots denote populations sampled for molecular analyses. Isolate codes as in the phylogeny in Fig. 2 are shown for reference and the position of the island of Kyra Panagia (= Pelagonisi), the type locality of H.pelagonesica, is indicated.

Remarks.

Neubert (2014: fig. 224) figured a shell of a snail from the tip of the Sithonia peninsula, Chalkidiki (NMBE 524743), which was quite similar to the brightly coloured form of H.schlaeflii from Corfu. He discussed this population with the first author in 2011 and back then both eventually identified it as H.schlaeflii, speculating it was possibly an anthropogenic occurrence. Following the examination of new material and phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1), we currently consider the form living at the tip of Sithonia to be a variety of H.p.pelagonesica. Its globular shell shape is a clear difference to typical H.p.pelagonesica, but this is a question of the height of individual whorls driven probably by the angle of the columella, so a change in a single parameter of the shell geometry is responsible for the difference. In some shells, the columella is not vertical and the difference in shell shape is much weaker (whorls are lower, suture deeper). The colouration of the shell and animal is identical to typical H.p.pelagonesica, whose sample was previously sequenced from a locality on the northern foot of a limestone hill near Porto Koufo (just over a kilometre from where we collected). The strongest argument for a separate taxon for the snails from the tip of Sithonia is the mitochondrial lineage found there, which does not fall within or sister to the clade comprising typical H.p.pelagonesica samples. However, the conchological similarities as well as geographic proximity suggest that there is a gene flow; the divergent mtDNA might be a relic of a period of separation that was then followed by merging back with H.p.pelagonesica. We found this form (Figs 7, 8) on the limestone hills on both sides of the Maratia Beach at the southernmost tip of the peninsula. This habitat contrasts with geological conditions on the rest of Sithonia, which is covered by substrates generally unfavourable for snails, in large part by granite and other plutonic rocks (Christofides et al. 2007). However, a strict dependence on limestone is unlikely, because Neubert (2014) also found a locality of the same form north of the limestone occurrences (17 road km south of Sarti, ~39.993°N, 23.959°E; NMBE 524745). Typical H.p.pelagonesica tolerates non-limestone substrates.

. Helix (Helix) pelagonesicathembones

Korábek, Juřičková & Hausdorf subsp. nov.

4B4C8C92-A925-5699-BF32-CDACC2C95420

https://zoobank.org/0CEEF1A3-6DF5-4961-91C2-34A49415CC19

Figs 11 , 12 , 13

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Shells of Helix (Helix) pelagonesica thembones. A. Holotype; Greece, Thessaly, Morfovouni; 39.3574°N, 21.7468°E; NMP P6M 44038; B. Greece, Thessaly, Mouzaki; 39.4135°N, 21.6642°E; NMP P6M 42942; C. Greece, Thessaly, between Morfovouni and Ellinopyrgos; 39.3747°N, 21.7318°E; NMP P6M 42944. Photo R. Coufal. Scale bar: 2 cm.

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

Helix (Helix) pelagonesica thembones (Greece, Thessaly, Morfovouni; 39.3574°N, 21.7468°E). Photo R. Coufal.

Figure 13.

Figure 13.

Genital system of Helix (Helix) pelagonesica thembones (paratype; Greece, Thessaly, Morfovouni; 39.3574°N, 21.7468°E; NMP P6M 42943). Abbreviations: ag = albumen gland; bc = bursa copulatrix; dpd = distal pedunculus; ds = dart sac; dv = diverticulum; fl = flagellum; go = genital opening (not visible); hd = hermaphroditic duct; mg = mucous glands; pn+dep = penis + distal epiphallus; pep = proximal epiphallus; ppd = proximal pedunculus; pr = penial retractor muscle; so = spermoviduct; vd = vas deferens.

Type material.

Holotype: (Fig. 11A) Greece • diameter 36 mm, height 37 mm; Thessaly, Morfovouni, hill on the NW outskirts of the village; 39.3574°N, 21.7468°E; 15 Apr. 2023; O. Korábek et al. leg.; NMP P6M 44038. The type locality is a northern side of the top of a small hill at the northwestern margin of Morfovouni (Μορφοβούνι; formerly Βουνέσι), Karditsa regional unit, Thessaly (Θεσσαλία). Paratypes: Greece • 15 shells, 9 bodies in ethanol; Thessaly, Morfovouni, hill on the NW outskirts of the village; 39.3574°N, 21.7468°E; 15 Apr. 2023; O. Korábek et al. leg.; NMP P6M 42943 • 2 shells; Morfovouni, hill on the NW outskirts of the village; 39.3574°N, 21.7468°E; 15 Apr. 2023; O. Korábek et al. leg.; ZMH 141525 • 12 shells; south of Mouzaki, by a road to Porti; 39.4135°N, 21.6642°E; 15 Apr. 2023; O. Korábek et al. leg.; NMP P6M 42942 • 6 shells; between Morfovouni and Ellinopyrgos, slope above a forest road; 39.3747°N, 21.7318°E; 16 Apr. 2023; O. Korábek et al. leg.; NMP P6M 42944 • 1 shell; rocks northwest of Morfovouni; 18 Jun.1985; B. Hausdorf leg.; ZMH 137861 • 1 shell; Morfovouni, crystallic rocks; 18 May 1995; P. Subai leg.; NMBE 524759 • 3 shells; Morfovouni, northern fringes, limestone rocks; 12 May 1997; P. Subai & M. Szekeres leg.; NMBE 524756 • 1 complete individual in alcohol; Morfovouni, northern fringes, east-oriented limestone rocks; 39.3567°N, 21.7464°E; 23 Apr. 2003; P. Subai leg.; NMBE 524760 • 1 shell; Mouzaki, rocks 1.5 km towards Kryonéri; 19 Jun. 1985; B. Hausdorf leg.; ZMH 137863 • 1 shell; 800 south of Mouzaki, junction to Porti; 39.4153°N 21.6659°E; 10 Apr. 1988; P. Subai leg.; NMBE 524757 • 1 shell; 1.6 km south of Mouzaki, junction to Porti; 39.4113°N 21.6630°E; 23 Apr. 2003; P. Subai leg.; NMBE 524746 • 1 shell; Elati, 7.3 km in direction to Pertouli and 2.9 km east on field road, coniferous forest, on limestone rocks; 39.5710°N, 21.5179°E; 23 Jul. 1990; P. Subai leg.; NMBE 524754 • 1 shell; Elati, 7.3 km in direction to Pertouli and 2.9 km east on field road, coniferous forest, on limestone rocks; 39.5710°N, 21.5179°E; 17 May 1991; P. Subai leg.; NMBE 524755 • 1 shell; Elati, 7.3 km in direction to Pertouli and 2.9 km east on field road, coniferous forest, on limestone rocks; 39.5710°N, 21.5179°E; 16 May 1995; P. Subai leg.; NMBE 524754.

Diagnosis.

Helixpelagonesicathembones differs from H.p.pelagonesica in the pale brownish shell with inconspicuous bands and paler apertural margins. Helixpelagonesicathembones has globular shells, whereas most populations of H.p.pelagonesica have more conical shells with a relatively smaller aperture.

Description.

Middle-sized globular shell (diameter 32–42 mm, height 33–43 mm) resembling in shape Helixpomatia; no umbilicus; protoconch large (~5–6 mm in diameter at 1 whorl); aperture semicircular; aperture margins and especially columella may be darker than the rest of the shell, with columella often meat-coloured to brown; shell surface relatively smooth, with only fine irregular riblets, pale brownish, sometimes with pinkish hue when alive; bands are inconspicuous, not much darker than the background, but present (2+3 and 4, sometimes weakly also 5, positioned close to the shell axis); apertural margins straight, slightly reflected only towards columella; animal pale brown to greyish brown, mantle margins pale.

Genital system (Fig. 13) with proximal epiphallus (sensu Korábek and Hausdorf 2023) much shorter than distal epiphallus and penis combined (4–5 vs 12–15 mm); flagellum well-developed (38–49 mm), mucous gland with many branches and of similar length as or longer than the dart sac; distal pedunculus of bursa copulatrix considerably thicker than the proximal part and leading to a well-developed diverticulum; diverticulum shorter than the proximal pedunculus (12–17 vs 21–32 mm), thick and flattened, narrowing towards tip (heavily swollen in the individual with a spermatophore in the pedunculus); distal genitalia (penis, epiphallus, vagina, the distal-most pedunculus) white.

Etymology.

Named after the opening track of the Alice in Chains’ 1992 album “Dirt” as a little reminder to all in power that they are also “gonna end up a big ol’ pile of them bones”. Noun in apposition.

Distribution.

The species was found on the band of hills that directly adjoin the Plain of Thessaly from the west (Fig. 14). The southern-most known locality is Morfovouni, the northernmost is ca 7 km north of Elati, so the known range extent is only slightly more than 30 km.

Figure 14.

Figure 14.

Approximate distribution of Helix (Helix) pelagonesica thembones. Black dots denote populations sampled for molecular analyses.

Ecology.

At the type locality, the greatest concentration of individuals was in an area overgrown by Phlomisfruticosa L. (Fig. 15). The same plant dominated vegetation in a small clearing in an oak forest northwest of Morfovouni, where we also found the species. The biology of the subspecies has not been studied. A spermatophore found in the bursa pedunculus of one of the dissected individuals indicates that mating takes place (at least partially) in April.

Figure 15.

Figure 15.

Limestone hill in Morfovouni, the type locality of Helix (Helix) pelagonesica thembones (Greece, Thessaly; 39.3574˚N 21.7468˚E; 15.4.2023). Photo R. Coufal.

Remarks.

The majority of the Helixpelagonesica populations differ in a conical shell shape from the plesiomorphic more globular shell shape in Helix. This conical shell shape characterises not only the populations in the contiguous main range of the species in Greek Macedonia and North Macedonia, for which the name Helixpelagonesicavardarica Knipper, 1939 has been proposed, but also isolates of the species in Thessalia, for which the name Helixvolensis Kobelt, 1906 was proposed, and the population from the island Kyra Panagia (= Pelagonisi) in the Northern Sporades, for which the species name was originally proposed. The populations with conical shell shape are monophyletic in the mitochondrial tree (Fig. 2). They are hardly differentiated. Therefore, the names given to these populations were synonymised (Neubert 2014). In contrast, there are populations from the surroundings of Morfovouni in western Thessaly and from the tip of Sithonia, the middle “finger” of the Chalkidiki peninsula in Macedonia, which differ from other populations of Helixpelagonesica so strongly in a globular shell shape that Neubert (2014) misidentified them as H.schlaeflii. It turned out that these globular populations are not related to H.schlaeflii (Fig. 2) but are the next relatives of H.pelagonesica. They were obviously isolated from the main lineage of H.p.pelagonesica before its shell became conical. However, the globular populations had different fates. There is probably no gene flow between the populations in the isolate in western Thessaly and those in the main range of the species because of the large geographic distance. This is supported by the distinctive pale shell of these populations (compare Figs 4, 5 to Figs 11, 12). Therefore, we suggest separating the populations from western Thessaly as a distinct subspecies Helixpelagonesicathembones from the other populations of Helixpelagonesica.

In contrast, the population from the tip of Sithonia came probably in secondary contact with the conical populations when they colonised the rest of Sithonia. We suppose that the globular population from the tip of Sithonia is connected by gene flow with the neighbouring H.pelagonesica populations, which are only about a kilometre apart, and that the differentiated populations are in the process of merging. Therefore, we currently classify this population as H.p.pelagonesica despite the still recognisable difference in shell shape and the deep split between the mitochondrial lineages of these populations (Fig. 2). The relationships between the H.pelagonesica populations should be re-examined by multi-locus markers. If it would turn out that gene flow between the globular population from the tip of Sithonia and the neighbouring populations remained restricted despite their proximity and that their genetic differentiation based on the multi-locus data reflects still the deep split between their mitochondrial lineages, it should be re-considered to classify also the population from the tip of Sithonia as a distinct subspecies.

We did not find any noteworthy differences between the genital system of H.pelagonesicathembones, typical H.pelagonesica and the form from the tip of Sithonia. The latter might have a somewhat shorter flagellum (35–37 mm, n = 2) compared to H.pelagonesicathembones (38–49 mm, n = 5), but both overlap with the typical H.pelagonesica (35–45 mm, n = 3).

Helixpelagonesicathembones is usually smaller than H.schlaeflii and has a smoother shell surface without the irregular whitish patterns typical for the latter. It differs from individuals of H.borealis with reduced banding in much paler colouration of the aperture margins and a much larger protoconch. Furthermore, the mucous glands in H.borealis are shorter, reaching only to the half of the dart sac, and diverticulum of bursa copulatrix may be much shorter in some individuals. Compared to H.philibinensis, which is usually distinctly banded, H.pelagonesicathembones has a higher aperture.

. Helix (Helix) schlaeflii

Mousson, 1859

263DCD36-E7BA-5EBB-B576-733FE6049051

Figs 16 , 17

Figure 16.

Figure 16.

Shells of Helix (Helix) schlaeflii. A. Greece, Western Macedonia, pass between Eptachori and Pentalofos; 40.2048°N, 21.0951°E; NMP P6M 42959; B. Albania, Gjirokastër County, Jorgucat; 39.9391°N, 20.2609°E; NMP P6M 42964. Photo R. Coufal. Scale bar: 2 cm.

Figure 17.

Figure 17.

Helix (Helix) schlaeflii (Greece, Western Macedonia, between Koryfi and Chrysavgi; 40.1757°N, 21.2302°N). Photo R. Coufal.

References.

Neubert 2014; Korábek et al. 2022.

Description.

Shell large, globular to conical; umbilicus sometimes slit-like but usually completely covered; protoconch large; shell surface with irregular ribs; basal colour whitish or very pale brown, more rarely the whole shell is brown; banding often reduced with upper bands 2 and 3 fused or partially fused and the lower two fuzzy and faint, but some populations have well developed, contrasting, reddish brown bands; bands with irregular whitish interruptions; aperture margins straight, only slightly reflected towards the columella; apertural lips and in particular the columellar triangle orange- or meat-brown to violet-brown, but the colouration is sometimes only faint and is missing or only weakly developed in the parietal area; mantle margins pale; animal very pale brown or grey to yellowish.

Distribution and habitat.

Common in Epirus and adjacent Western Macedonia (eastern limits uncertain, but apparently west of Kastoria, Neapoli and Grevena); occurs also on Kerkyra (Corfu). The range of the species as currently accepted extends to central Albania and up to the Galičica Mountains between the lakes Ochrid and Prespa (Fig. 18). In Greece, it occurs in a range of habitats, from Mediterranean-type shrubby vegetation on limestones in low altitudes in the west to more temperate landscapes on sandstones in the east, but occurs also in pine forests as well as on the margins of beech forests in altitudes over 1000 m. Geophilous.

Figure 18.

Figure 18.

Approximate distribution of Helix (Helix) schlaeflii. Black dots denote populations sampled for molecular analyses.

Remarks.

Differences to H.thessalica and H.borealis are described under the respective species. Helixschlaeflii differs from H.straminea in globular shape with an expanded last whorl and a larger aperture; the Greek populations often differ in a pale colouration, because H.straminea has typically more vivid colours. Helixstraminea also lacks the whitish pattern on the bands characteristic for H.schlaeflii and often has a darker, brown foot.

Helixschlaeflii is not monophyletic in the mitochondrial tree (Fig. 2). This is due to three issues. First, there are two mitochondrial clades in this species that are deeply divergent and whose mutual relationships remain unresolved. Second, the population from Krujë (central Albania, isolate SH5 in the tree) possesses a mitochondrial lineage introgressed from Helixsecernenda Rossmässler, 1847. Third, a sample of H.straminea yielded a mitochondrial lineage typical for H.schlaeflii, apparently also due to introgression. Mitochondrial introgressions are not rare in the western-Balkan radiation of Helix (Korábek et al. 2022) and an ancient introgression may in fact account also for the presence of two divergent lineages within H.schlaeflii. Introgressions are generally a major problem for species identification using mitochondrial data (Funk and Omland 2003).

. Helix (Helix) straminea

Briganti, 1825

5FD85ABD-F58E-5022-81D6-37369BCE86E1

Figs 19 , 20

Figure 19.

Figure 19.

Shell of Helix (Helix) straminea (Greece, Thessaly, Mykani northeast of Kalambaka; 39.7964°N, 21.5315°E; NMP P6M 42941). Photo R. Coufal. Scale bar: 2 cm.

Figure 20.

Figure 20.

Helix (Helix) straminea (Greece, Thessaly, Mykani northeast of Kalambaka; 39.7964°N, 21.5315°E). Photo R. Coufal.

References.

Korábek et al. 2014, 2022; Petraccioli et al. 2021.

Description.

Shell (Fig. 19) large, conical, with varying relative height; umbilicus fully covered or more rarely slit-like; individual whorls low and tightly coiled; suture deep; last whorl not expanded; aperture small and low; no umbilicus; protoconch rather large; shell surface irregular with occasional lightly coloured ribs; basic colour pale grey, usually with four well-developed dark brown bands of which the middle pair is much thicker, but bands sometimes only faint; aperture margins brown, about as dark as the bands. Animal (Fig. 20) brown including mantle margins, rarely pale brown.

Distribution and habitat.

Helixstraminea occurs in the northwest of North Macedonia and in central Albania (Fig. 21); besides that, it is widely distributed in the Apennines (Petraccioli et al. 2021; Korábek et al. 2022). This species is reported here from Greece for the first time; it was found in a floodplain of a small stream north of Kalambaka (Thessaly, central Greece). Two live individuals and several empty shells were collected in a gallery forest dominated by Platanus, but with a rich herb understorey. While the mitochondrial haplotype of these specimens belongs to one of the mitochondrial lineages of H.schlaeflii, they can be identified as H.straminea based on the more conical shell with a narrower last whorl and a smaller aperture (cf. Korábek et al. 2014: fig. 4B). A closely related H.schlaeflii haplotype was already recorded in H.straminea before in central Albania, where two other sequenced individuals from the same population had H.straminea haplotypes as expected (Korábek et al. 2022). However, that population originated from central Albania and all the H.schlaeflii haplotypes related to the haplotype from Greece obtained here also originate from central Albania. Although H.straminea (as Helixvladika (Kobelt, 1898)) was reported from an unspecified locality in the valley of Vjosa at the border between Albania and Greece (Dhora and Welter-Schultes 1996), the current record is far from the range of the species and is perhaps explainable by an introduction. However, there may exist a second population in northern Greece on the east bank of the Ioannina Lake, as documented by one convincing and two possible records posted on iNaturalist (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/180903383, https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/189208381, https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/121853021). Furthermore, the distribution of H.straminea in the Balkan part of its range is very scattered, so it is conceivable that it extends naturally also to northern Greece.

Figure 21.

Figure 21.

Approximate distribution of Helix (Helix) straminea in Greece. Black dots denote populations sampled for molecular analyses. The western area of occurrence in Greece still requires confirmation.

Helixstraminea was in the Balkans found in different habitats, from beech forests to shrubs. There is no clear species boundary to the closely related H.vladika in the north (northern Albania to central Serbia).

. Helix (Helix) thessalica

Boettger, 1886

18FD6CC0-2B72-5732-9C61-87FA98C808A1

Figs 22 , 23

Figure 22.

Figure 22.

Shell of Helix (Helix) thessalica (Greece, Western Macedonia, between Kastaneri and Livadia; 40.9867°N, 22.3254°E; NMP P6M 42923). Photo R. Coufal. Scale bar: 2 cm.

Figure 23.

Figure 23.

Helix (Helix) thessalica (Greece, Thessaly, Chania; 39.3967°N, 23.0603°E; NMP P6M 30149). Photo O. Korábek.

References.

Korábek et al. 2016a, 2016b, 2020, 2023b; Korábek and Hausdorf 2024.

Description.

Shell (Fig. 22) large, globular; body whorl large; very spacious aperture; umbilicus narrow, completely covered or slit-like; shell surface with irregular fine ribs; strongly developed fine spiral grooves (well visible above the aperture); shell covered with a thick periostracum, yellowish brown; bands largely missing in Greek populations; aperture margins white in Greek populations; mantle pale. Animal (Fig. 23) pale brown or yellowish.

Distribution and habitat.

In Greece it lives in higher altitudes. It is relatively broadly distributed in the Rhodopes (Fig. 24), there are isolated occurrences in Thessaly (Ossa/Kissavos, Pelion), and we report it here from the Paiko Mts. (SW of Gevgelija). Its typical habitat in Greece is beech forests, where it can be found in places enriched in nutrients (e.g. along streams, in nettles). Geophilous, but juveniles climb on herbs and can be often found on their leaves.

Figure 24.

Figure 24.

Approximate distribution of Helix (Helix) thessalica in Greece. Black dots denote populations sampled for molecular analyses.

Remarks.

The most similar species in Greece is H.schlaeflii. In Helixthessalica, the shell is in most cases much more darkly coloured with a distinctly developed periostracum. Greek populations lack any brown colour on the columella, which in turn is characteristic for H.schlaeflii. Helixthessalica has a dark grey penis, epiphallus and vagina. The description as provided fits the Greek populations, but in other parts of the range the species may be distinctively banded, with brown apertural margins and darker foot.

. Helix (Helix) philibinensis

Rossmässler, 1839

5F606D81-DAF0-5B4C-BD92-444959C5BC59

Figs 25 , 26

Figure 25.

Figure 25.

Shell of Helix (Helix) philibinensis (Greece, Western Macedonia, Servia; 40.1788°N, 21.9969°E; NMP P6M 42938). Photo R. Coufal. Scale bar: 2 cm.

Figure 26.

Figure 26.

Helix (Helix) philibinensis (Greece, Western Macedonia, Imera; 40.3008°N, 22.0501°E). Photo R. Coufal.

References.

Neubert 2014; Korábek et al. 2022.

Description.

Shell (Fig. 25) small, globular or slightly conical; body whorl expanded but bent downwards, so the aperture is relatively small; no umbilicus; protoconch middle-sized, but relatively large to shell size, making the apex blunt; shell surface with some growth lines but quite smooth; shell colour is whitish to pale brown; bands variously developed, brown on brown shells and with red or purple hue on whitish shells; all bands often separate on older whorls but may fuse towards the aperture; aperture margins straight, usually brown to some degree at least at the columella which may be very dark. Foot (Fig. 26) pale grey with dark brown back.

Distribution and habitat.

Distributed from Lake Prespa (northwestern Greece) to the island of Thasos (northeastern Greece) (Fig. 27). The southernmost populations occur on Chalkidiki (the base of the peninsula) and in the south of Western Macedonia (by Servia). In the north, it reaches almost to Skopje in North Macedonia and to Plovdiv in Bulgaria. The core of the range is in Central Macedonia, elsewhere the distribution is highly fragmented. Typically living in open, shrubby habitats, often on rocky slopes, but sometimes found even on forested valley bottoms. It appears to be indifferent to bedrock, as we found it on limestones, but also on granite and gneiss. Though typically resting on the ground, we saw it climbing onto vegetation during rain.

Figure 27.

Figure 27.

Approximate distribution of Helix (Helix) philibinensis. Black dots denote populations sampled for molecular analyses (including unpublished data).

. Helix (Helix) borealis

Mousson, 1859

10EF5060-A543-5B47-834E-2B5E80D3F675

Figs 28 , 29

Figure 28.

Figure 28.

Shell of Helix (Helix) borealis (Greece, West Greece, Zacharo; 37.4973°N, 21.6110°E; NMBE 565401). Photo P. J. Juračka (reproduced from Korábek et al. 2021 with permission). Scale bar: 2 cm.

Figure 29.

Figure 29.

Helix (Helix) borealis (Greece, Thessaly, Loutropigi; 39.1174°N, 22.0413°E). Photo R. Coufal.

References.

Neubert 2014; Korábek et al. 2021.

Description.

Shell (Fig. 28) mid-sized, globular to slightly conical; aperture rounded and in the more globular populations spacious; umbilicus missing; protoconch small; shell surface rather smooth, with fine growth lines; basal colour ranging from nearly white to pale brown; banding pattern varies from completely reduced bands to well-developed and contrasting; the upper three bands may be separated only on the upper whorls or well separated up to the last whorl; aperture margins and the parietal region brown and much darker than the rest of the shell, the colour ranges from vivid pale brown with orange tones (Ionian Islands, Epirus) to dark with purple tones (Peloponnese, Evia); mantle margins pale. Animal (Fig. 29) pale grey or pale brown, often but not always with a dark back of the foot.

Distribution and habitat.

Typical Helixborealis is distributed over much of Peloponnese, the east of central Greece (Aetolia, Acarnania, Phocis, Evrytania) and in western Epirus (Fig. 30). It also occurs on the Ionian Islands. The inhabited environments include as disparate types as rocky phrygana, pine forests on sand dunes at the sea level, and open fir forests in the mountains. Geophilous. Besides typical H.borealis, there are two other, rather divergent lineages in Greece. One occurs on northern Evia and Northern Sporades. It is found in rocky habitats on limestones. The second has a small range in the mountains of western Crete.

Figure 30.

Figure 30.

Approximate distribution of Helix (Helix) borealis in Greece. Black dots denote populations sampled for molecular analyses (including unpublished data).

Remarks.

Some H.borealis populations have a globular shell with shape resembling that of H.figulina, but with a smoother, not regularly ribbed surface. There is also always some brown colouration of the apertural margins. In colour, H.borealis is often very similar to H.pelagonesica, but the two differ in shell shape and in the small protoconch of H.borealis. The globular-shelled form of H.pelagonesica from the tip of Sithonia (see below) is similar to H.borealis also in the shell shape but has a larger protoconch. In Epirus, H.borealis occurs syntopically with H.schlaeflii. Although the colouration may be similar there, H.schlaeflii is much larger and has a large protoconch.

In the mitochondrial phylogeny (Fig. 2), H.borealis appears as possibly polyphyletic. However, the relevant parts of the tree are unresolved, so this is likely just an issue of low phylogenetic signal.

. Helix (Helix) lucorum

Linnaeus, 1758

57FAD28A-0020-5613-8CAE-28A454E647CE

Figs 31 , 32

Figure 31.

Figure 31.

Shells of Helix (Helix) lucorum. A. Greece, Central Macedonia, Stavros; 40.6678°N, 23.6483°E; NMP P6M 30026; B. Türkiye, Manisa Province, Spil Dağı; 38.5822°N, 27.4269°E; NMP P6M 30055. Photo R. Coufal. Scale bar: 2 cm.

Figure 32.

Figure 32.

Helix (Helix) lucorum (Czechia, Praha, U Nákladového nádraží; 50.0832°N, 14.4750°E). Photo O. Korábek.

References.

ICZN 2002; Neubert 2014; Korábek et al. 2018, 2023a; Korábek 2020.

Description.

Shell (Fig. 31) mid-sized to large, broadly conical to depressed conical, with relatively narrow body whorl and low aperture; umbilicus present in juveniles but usually fully closed in adults; protoconch small relative to shell size; shell surface smooth; basal colour of the shell whitish, but usually largely covered by dark brown fused bands; characteristic are transverse dark bands marking growth interruptions; conspicuous whitish band along the shell periphery; aperture margins straight at the upper insertion but becoming reflected towards the lower lip and columella, brown inside; columellar margin oblique and often with an internal ridge. Animal (Fig. 32) uniformly brown including the mantle margins; diaphragm paper-like.

Distribution and habitat.

Found commonly in northern Greece except for west of the Pindos Mts. (Fig. 33) but may also be found synanthropically elsewhere (e.g. Peloponnese). Broadly distributed and somewhat invasive species, currently extending its range in Europe. In the northeastern Aegean (Samothraki, Lesvos) a different morphotype with globular shells occurs. Helixlucorum lives in various shrubs and herbs and in deciduous forests, but avoids dry Mediterranean types of habitats (phrygana, maquis, exposed rocks). Commonly synanthropic, in some areas exclusively so. Often climbs on vegetation.

Figure 33.

Figure 33.

Approximate distribution of Helix (Helix) lucorum in Greece. Black dots denote populations sampled for molecular analyses. Isolated synanthropic occurrences were omitted.

Remarks.

Helixlucorum is very variably coloured and also details of the shell and aperture shape vary. The forms present in mainland Greece are typically very darkly coloured, with a white band on the periphery. The animal is also rather darkly coloured. It has a similar shell shape as H.straminea and H.pelagonesica, but besides the colour it differs in smooth shell surface and presence of strong transverse banding, visible at least at the bottom of the shell. We found H.lucorum syntopic with H.figulina, H.thessalica and H.philibinensis.

Subgenus. Pelasga

Hesse, 1908

99A7F357-DC73-5A90-950F-B4CFFD2CA00C

References.

Hesse 1908; Neubert 2014; Korábek and Hausdorf 2023.

Type species.

Helix (Helicogena) pelasgica Kobelt 1904 = Helixfigulina Rossmässler, 1839, by subsequent designation (Hesse 1918: 38).

. Helix (Pelasga) figulina

Rossmässler, 1839

B9F5F964-764C-536E-944A-C994E8C54847

Figs 34 , 35

Figure 34.

Figure 34.

Shell of Helix (Pelasga) figulina (Greece, Western Macedonia, near Kozani; 40.3414°N, 21.8138°E; NMP P6M 42935). Photo R. Coufal. Scale bar: 2 cm.

Figure 35.

Figure 35.

Helix (Pelasga) figulina (Greece, Central Macedonia, Mandres; 40.8681°N, 22.9011°E). A subadult individual lacking a peristome and with a brown periostracum that is already lost on older whorls and is missing in adults. Photo R. Coufal.

References.

Neubert 2014; Korábek et al. 2022.

Description.

Shell (Fig. 34) very small (the smallest Helix species in Greece), globular, with large body whorl and spacious aperture; no umbilicus; protoconch very small; shell surface with regular, rounded ribs and lacking spiral sculpture; shell pale greyish or brownish, with the lower two bands narrow and the upper three faint and most often partly fused; aperture margins straight and white; white columella rounded and smoothly transitioning into the palatal area. Animal (Fig. 35) pale brownish with darker, brown or reddish-brown, back, mantle margins pale grey; calcareous diaphragm conspicuously convex and attached to the very margins of the aperture.

Distribution and habitat.

Very common species distributed over large part of mainland Greece and the Peloponnese (Fig. 36), but completely missing from the west (<21.5–22.0°E). It is broadly distributed from the southeast of North Macedonia (valleys of Strumica and Vardar, isolated occurrences reported up to Kumanovo) and southeastern Bulgaria (Thrace) to the Aegean islands (Cyclades, Northern Sporades, Lesvos, Samothraki, etc.). It also lives in a small area of western Anatolia (e.g. the ancient Pergamon and Troy). Fossils were found on Crete (Kotsakiozi et al. 2012). It lives in open, often exposed habitats with low vegetation. May be difficult to find alive when inactive because it buries itself into the soil. Geophilous.

Figure 36.

Figure 36.

Approximate distribution of Helix (Pelasga) figulina in Greece. Black dots denote populations sampled for molecular analyses (including unpublished data).

Remarks.

Helixfigulina is easily recognisable due to small size, a very small protoconch, globular shell shape with large aperture, rounded columella smoothly transitioning to the bottom of the previous whorl, completely white aperture margins, and regularly ribbed surface. It may be found syntopically or nearly so with H.lucorum, H.borealis, H.philibinensis and H.pelagonesica. Helixphilibinensis is the most similar species overlapping in size, but it has a blunter apex, smoother shell surface, smaller aperture which usually has at least partially coloured margins.

Other Greek Helix species

Several other Helix species occur on the islands in the Aegean Sea; we provide here only a brief overview. Majority of them appears to be non-native, indicating a substantial transport of these edible snails in the past.

An endemic, divergent lineage of H.borealis lives in western Crete (sample BR21A in Fig. 2). Mitochondrial data group it together with a H.borealis lineage endemic to a small area in southwestern Anatolia (Korábek et al. 2021; samples BR1 and BR1C in Fig. 2); multilocus data are not available. Fossil shells of snails of H.borealis were also found on Gavdos south of Crete (Welter-Schultes 1998) and on a small islet Astakida northeast of Crete (Mylonas and Vardinoyannis 2022). The Cretan snails have pale brown shells with weakly developed banding and brown aperture margins.

Helix (Helix) pronuba Westerlund, 1879 is more widely distributed in the south of Crete. It is a species with dark brown apertural margins. Its small shells have a granulated upper surface and are often conspicuously banded. The shell is rounded, with a large last whorl and relatively spacious aperture. Besides Crete, H.pronuba was also reported from Chalki (Neubert 2014) and Anafi (Psonis et al. 2015), but it is not native to Greece and originates from northern Africa.

The taxonomically problematic group of Helix (Helix) cincta is represented on eastern Aegean islands by a lineage known as Helixvalentini Kobelt, 1891 as well as by typical Helixcincta Müller, 1774. The group originates from northern Levant (Korábek et al. 2021) and the snails also have brown apertural margins. The former lineage has large, conical shells, and is (or was) found on Kos, Kalymnos, Pserimos and surrounding islets (Neubert 2014; Psonis et al. 2015). Recently, shells were reported from Syrna (Mylonas and Vardinoyannis 2022). Observations posted on iNaturalist (accessed in June 2024) indicate that its main distribution area is in western Syria (governorates Latakia, Tartus). Typical H.cincta has a more rounded shell and colouration typically lacking a pattern of fine whitish spots over the bands. The typical form (or its mitochondrial lineage) is distributed on Lipsi, Fournoi, Ikaria, Samos, Chios, and Lesvos.

Helix (Helix) fathallae Nägele, 1901 lives in Greece only on Rhodos. It is most similar in shell shape and colour to H.philibinensis, having a larger protoconch and darker apertural margins than H.cincta. Furthermore, the columellar triangle is differently shaped, not depressed as in H.cincta. It is also a non-native species with problematic taxonomy, but the sample from Rhodos analysed by Korábek et al. (2021) was very closely related to a sample from the type locality. Maroulis et al. (2024) recently examined the genital system and identified the samples from Rhodes as H.cincta; we reject this conclusion based on our knowledge of the conchological variation of both taxa as well as the mitochondrial phylogeny.

Helix (Helix) asemnis Bourguignat, 1860 is a middle-sized to large species with whitish shells. Banding pattern varies, but the brown or reddish bands are often not very dark and the three upper bands typically fuse. Aperture margins are purely white and the foot is greyish pink to purely pink in adults. It lives on the islands of Megisti (Mylonas et al. 2019) and Symi (Maroulis et al. 2024). It was reported in the past from Chios and Samos (von Martens 1889), which are detached from its continuous range in southern Anatolia.

Southeastern Aegean islands are inhabited by Helix (Pelasga) nucula Mousson, 1854, whose distribution limits are marked by Lesvos in the north and Kasos in the west (Neubert 2014; Korábek et al. 2022). It is a small species very similar to H.figulina, but with dense spiral grooves making the surface of the upper half of the shell granulated. Helixnucula is not native to the Aegean and originates from the northern Levant (Korábek et al. 2022).

Helix (Aegaeohelix) godetiana Kobelt, 1878 (Fig. 37) is a phylogenetically isolated species of Helix that, as findings of subfossil shells of unknown age show, was broadly distributed on the Cyclades and in Dodecanese (Frank 1997; Neubert 2014; Maroulis et al. 2025). However, H.godetiana is a declining species and its recent distribution is much smaller (Maroulis et al. 2025). It is extant on Naxos, Amorgos, Astypalaia, Anafi, and Syrna, along with a few small adjacent islets (Gambetta 1929; Mylonas 1985; Neubert 2014; Psonis et al. 2015; Mylonas and Vardinoyannis 2022; Maroulis et al. 2025). Letourneux (1884) collected a live individual on Santorini (Thira). The species is unmistakable: the shell is darkly coloured, with rapidly expanding whorls and large aperture; the embryonal shell is broad.

Figure 37.

Figure 37.

Shells of Helix (Aegaeohelix) godetiana (Greece, Cyclades, Amorgos; ZMB). Photo O. Korábek. Scale bar: 2 cm.

Discussion

Eight of the ~38 currently accepted Helix species (MolluscaBase eds 2024) live in continental Greece, which includes species from two (Helix, Pelasga) of its three subgenera (the third, Aegaeohelix, is endemic to the Greek islands) and from all three major clades within the nominotypic subgenus (Korábek et al. 2015). Greece is an important centre of European land snail diversity and the same holds for Helix, therefore it is in Greece where we may expect to find narrowly distributed endemic lineages the most.

When revising the eastern distribution limits of H.schlaeflii, we discovered two new mitochondrial lineages that form a clade with H.pelagonesica. Both have a limited distribution: one is found only on the tip of the Sithonia peninsula, the other lives along a strip of hills that is no more than 50 km in length. The latter lineage is described here as a new subspecies, Helixpelagonesicathembones. We decided to introduce a new taxon for four reasons: a) this mitochondrial lineage is distinctive, sister to the lineage found in typical H.pelagonesica across its distribution range, b) populations sharing this lineage are characterised by shell shape different from typical H.pelagonesica and c) their shell colouration is unique, and d) this lineage and the corresponding morphotype occur in a small area that is geographically isolated from the rest of H.pelagonesica’s distribution range. Only a) and b) applies also for the lineage from the tip of Sithonia. These snails are, except for a different shell shape, very similar to typical H.pelagonesica, and there is currently no geographic isolation from H.pelagonesica. Although the lineage from the tip of Sithonia is more distantly related to typical H.pelagonesica in the mitochondrial tree than is the one described here as a new subspecies, we decided not to formally describe it as a new taxon. In H.pelagonesicathembones the difference in appearance is more pronounced and the geographic isolation means that the lineage is evolving independently. In contrast, the mitochondrial lineage from the tip of Sithonia could be a remnant of a previously isolated lineage whose nuclear genome now largely merged back with H.pelagonesica. Genome-wide data from a detailed sampling of H.pelagonesica would be needed to resolve the issue definitely.

The new subspecies appears to have a very restricted distribution range. We speculate that the species may be limited by geological conditions, occurring basically only in a narrow strip of limestones squeezed between flysch to the west and the Thessalian plain to the east (Apostolidis and Koukis 2013). Under this hypothesis, it can be expected to occur up to the vicinity of Kalambaka. However, in Greece, the link between habitats and the occurrence of Helix species is in most cases unclear. On the one hand, there are many places where no Helix or only H.figulina occurs, suggesting that they are unsuitable for most species. On the other hand, it is apparent that in most cases the species live in a variety of habitats. Helixphilibinensis, a species with a somewhat scattered distribution, was found by us both on limestones and acidic rocks and on open, exposed, rocky slopes as well as in shaded habitats. Helixschlaeflii and H.borealis are distributed from phrygana in the low altitudes to altitudes over 1000 m with completely different vegetation and substantially cooler climate. So what is limiting the distribution of Greek Helix species is currently unclear. It is possible that interspecific interactions played some role in setting the distributions as especially related species do not co-occur. While H. (Pelasga) figulina lives syntopically with several Helix (Helix) species, syntopy between species of the nominotypic subgenus is in continental Greece limited to a few combinations of species that are phylogenetically distant: H.lucorum with H.philibinensis or H.thessalica, H.borealis with H.schlaeflii. However, we stress that the biology of the Greek species is generally unknown.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Helicidae
XML Treatment for Helicinae
XML Treatment for Helicini
XML Treatment for Helix
XML Treatment for Helix
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) pelagonesicapelagonesica
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) pelagonesicathembones
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) schlaeflii
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) straminea
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) thessalica
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) philibinensis
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) borealis
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) lucorum
XML Treatment for Pelasga
XML Treatment for Helix (Pelasga) figulina

Acknowledgements

We thank Eike Neubert, Estée Bochud (both NMBE) and Štěpánka Podroužková (NMP) for providing access to material from museum collections, and Jennifer Lauschke (ZMH) for help with the sequencing.

Citation

Korábek O, Dolejš P, Coufal R, Juřičková L, Kubíková K, Hausdorf B (2025) A new distinctive lineage of Helix (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora, Helicidae), with a guide to Helix species from mainland Greece. ZooKeys 1249: 93–135. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1249.143635

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Use of AI

No use of AI was reported.

Funding

This work has been supported by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic (DKRVO 2024–2028/6.II.b, National Museum of the Czech Republic, 00023272) and by the Charles University Research Centre program No. UNCE/24/SCI/006.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: OK. Data curation: OK. Formal analysis: OK. Funding acquisition: PD, BH. Investigation: KK, PD, OK, RC, LJ. Methodology: BH, OK. Resources: BH, LJ. Visualization: OK, RC. Writing – original draft: OK. Writing – review and editing: OK, RC, KK, LJ, BH, PD.

Author ORCIDs

Ondřej Korábek https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2522-9165

Petr Dolejš https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9360-7247

Radovan Coufal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5870-5041

Lucie Juřičková https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5163-1222

Kateřina Kubíková https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7328-0146

Bernhard Hausdorf https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1604-1689

Data availability

Nucleotide sequences were deposited in the NCBI Nucleotide database; accession numbers are listed in the Supplementary Information.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1

List of samples used in the phylogenetic analysis with locality and voucher information and GenBank accession numbers

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Ondřej Korábek, Petr Dolejš, Radovan Coufal, Lucie Juřičková, Kateřina Kubíková, Bernhard Hausdorf

Data type

ods

References

  1. Adamcová T, Juřičková L, Proćków M, Neubert E, Petrusek A, Korábek O. (2024) Taxonomic revision and dissolution of the genus Monachoides (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora). Zoologica Scripta 53(4): 419–437. 10.1111/zsc.12658 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Apostolidis E, Koukis G. (2013) Engineering-geological conditions of the formations in the Western Thessaly basin, Greece. Open Geosciences 5(3): 407–422. 10.2478/s13533-012-0200-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boettger O. (1886) Aufzählung der in Thessalien gesammelten Schnecken und Muscheln II. Jahrbücher der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 13: 50–73. [pl. 2.] https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16355749 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boettger O. (1898) Zwei neue Landschnecken aus Kleinasien. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 30: 12–16. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28228430 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourguignat JR. (1860) Aménités malacologiques, LXXXIII. Catalogue des coquilles euro-péennes appartenant au groupe des Helixpomatia, ligata, etc. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie (2) 12: 71–75. [154–166, pls 3–8.] https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2264325
  6. Briganti V. (1825) Descrizioni di due nuove specie di Elici. Atti della Reale Accademia delle Scienze, sezione della Società Reale Borbonica 2: 265–276. [pls 1, 2.] https://www.google.cz/books/edition/Atti_della_Reale_Accademia_delle_Scienze/3FdFAAAAcAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PP9&printsec=frontcover [Google Scholar]
  7. Cadahía L, Harl J, Duda M, Sattmann H, Kruckenhauser L, Fehér Z, Zopp L, Haring E. (2014) New data on the phylogeny of Ariantinae (Pulmonata, Helicidae) and the systematic position of Cylindrusobtusus based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA marker sequences. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 52(2): 163–169. 10.1111/jzs.12044 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cadevall J, Orozco A. (2016) Caracoles y Babosas de la Península Ibérica y Baleares. Omega, Barcelona, 817 pp. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cameron RAD, Pokryszko BM, Gheoca V, Horsák M. (2016) At the Central European–Balkan transition: Forest land snail faunas of the Banat contrasted with those of the Carpathian chain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 119(3): 560–570. 10.1111/bij.12498 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cameron RAD, Sulikowska-Drozd A, Marzec M. (2023) Angels on the head of a pin: The occurrence and co-existence of clausiliid species in Europe. Archiv für Molluskenkunde 152(2): 107–125. 10.1127/arch.moll/152/107-125 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chiba S. (1999) Accelerated evolution of land snails Mandarina in the oceanic Bonin Islands: Evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 53(2): 460–471. 10.2307/2640782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Christofides G, Perugini D, Koroneos A, Soldatos T, Poli G, Eleftheriadis G, Del Moro A, Neiva AM. (2007) Interplay between geochemistry and magma dynamics during magma interaction: An example from the Sithonia Plutonic Complex (NE Greece). Lithos 95(3–4): 243–266. 10.1016/j.lithos.2006.07.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. de Montfort PD. (1810) Conchyliologie Systématique, et Classification Méthodique des Coquilles (Tome second). F. Schoell, Paris. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11065017
  14. Dhora Dh, Welter-Schultes FW. (1996) List of species and atlas of the non-marine molluscs of Albania. Schriften zur Malakozoologie 9: 90–197. [Google Scholar]
  15. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3(5): 294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Frank C. (1997) Die Molluskenfauna der Insel Rhodos, 2. Teil. Stapfia 48: 1–181. https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/STAPFIA_0048_0001-0179.pdf [Google Scholar]
  17. Funk DJ, Omland KE. (2003) Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34(1): 397–423. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132421 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gambetta L. (1929) Molluschi. In: Ghigi A. (Ed.) Ricerche faunistiche nelle isole italiani dell’Egeo compiute da Alessandro Chigi, Raffaele Issel, Alessandro Brian, Renato Santucci, Vittorio Citterio, Frederico Alzani per incarico del Governo delle Isole Egee nell’Agosto del 1926. Parte seconda – Fauna terrestre e fluviale.Archivio Zoologico Italiano 13: 45–117. http://digitale.bnc.roma.sbn.it/tecadigitale/giornale/TO00209791/1929/unico/00000057
  19. Giusti F, Manganelli G, Schembri PJ. (1995) The non-marine molluscs of the Maltese Islands. Monografie Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali 15: 1–607. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hausdorf B, Hennig C. (2003) Nestedness of north-west European land snail ranges as a consequence of differential immigration from Pleistocene glacial refuges. Oecologia 135(1): 102–109. 10.1007/s00442-002-1142-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hausdorf B, Röpstorf P, Riedel F. (2003) Relationships and origin of endemic Lake Baikal gastropods (Caenogastropoda: Rissooidea) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26(3): 435–443. 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00365-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hesse P. (1908) Kritische Fragmente [IV. Berichtigung einiger Namen; V. Helixberytensis Fér. und fourousi Bgt.; VI. Bemerkungen über das Genus Theba Risso (Carthusiana Kob.); VI. Das Genus Helix Lam., s. str. (Helicogena Fér.)]. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 40: 131–141. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15107358 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hesse P. (1917) Kritische Fragmente. XVIII. Nochmals Nomenklaturfragen. XVIII. Ein neues Subgenus von Acme. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 49: 122–124. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/35619258 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hesse P. (1918) Kritische Fragmente [XIX. Helixjasonis Dubois. XX. Helixgenezarethana Mss. XXI. Die Subfamilien Murellinae und Helicinae (Pentataenia Ad. Schmidt)]. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 50: 34–40. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/35618480 [Google Scholar]
  25. Horsák M, Horsáková V, Divíšek J, Nekola JC. (2022) Ecological niche divergence between extant and glacial land snail populations explained. Scientific Reports 12(1): 806. 10.1038/s41598-021-04645-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Horsáková V, Nekola JC, Horsák M. (2019) When is a “cryptic” species not a cryptic species: A consideration from the Holarctic micro-landsnail genus Euconulus (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 132: 307–320. 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (2002) Opinion 1996 (Case 3158) Helixlucorum Linnaeus, 1758 and Helixpunctata Müller, 1774 (currently Otalapunctata; Mollusca, Gastropoda): Usage of the specific names conserved by the replacement of the syntypes of H.lucorum with a neotype. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 59: 135–136. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34358243 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Katoh K, Standley DM. (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kerney MP, Cameron RAD. (1979) A Field Guide to the Land Snails of Britain and North-west Europe. Collins, London, 288 pp. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kobelt W. (1878) Diagnosen neuer Arten. Jahrbücher der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 5: 319–321. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/25214440 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kobelt W. (1883) Diagnosen neuer Arten. Jahrbücher der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 10: 84–85. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/27005764 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kobelt W. (1891–1892) Iconographie der Land- & Süßwasser-Mollusken mit vorzüglicher Berücksichtigung der europäischen noch nicht abgebildeten Arten. Neue Folge. Fünfter Band. Kreidel, Wiesbaden, (Heft 1/2): 1–40. [pls 121–130 [1891]; (Heft 3/4): 41–80, pls 131–140 [1891]; (Heft 5/6): 81–118, pls 141–150 [1892].] https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16298699
  34. Kobelt W. (1898) Neue Helix-Arten aus Montenegro. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 30: 161–165. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28228585 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kobelt W. (1903) Diagnosen neuer Arten. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 35: 145–151. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15607796 [Google Scholar]
  36. Korábek O. (2020) On Helixgrisea Linnaeus, 1758 and the Helix species described by Carl Linnaeus and Otto Friedrich Müller. Malacologica Bohemoslovaca: Journal About Molluscs in Central Europe 19: 1–8. 10.5817/MaB2020-19-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Korábek O, Hausdorf B. (2023) Unravelling the double Helixescherichi, with description of Helixankae sp. nov. and a discussion of Maltzanella and the subgenera of Helix (Gastropoda: Helicidae). Archiv für Molluskenkunde 152(2): 239–256. 10.1127/arch.moll/152/239-256 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Korábek O, Hausdorf B. (2024) Accelerated mitochondrial evolution and asymmetric fitness of hybrids contribute to the persistence of Helixthessalica in the Helixpomatia range. Molecular Ecology 33(16): e17474. 10.1111/mec.17474 [DOI] [PubMed]
  39. Korábek O, Juřičková L, Petrusek A. (2014) Resurrecting Helixstraminea, a forgotten escargot with trans-Adriatic distribution: first insights into the genetic variation within the genus Helix (Gastropoda: Pulmonata): Redescription of Helixstraminea. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 171(1): 72–91. 10.1111/zoj.12122 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Korábek O, Petrusek A, Neubert E, Juřičková L. (2015) Molecular phylogeny of the genus Helix (Pulmonata: Helicidae). Zoologica Scripta 44(3): 263–280. 10.1111/zsc.12101 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Korábek O, Juřičková L, Petrusek A. (2016a) Splitting the Roman snail Helixpomatia Linnaeus, 1758 (Stylommatophora: Helicidae) into two: redescription of the forgotten Helixthessalica Boettger, 1886. The Journal of Molluscan Studies 82: 11–22. 10.1093/mollus/eyv048 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Korábek O, Juřičková L, Petrusek A. (2016b) Hlemýžď pruhovaný, nový druh pro evropskou i českou faunu (Helixthessalica, a new species of European and Czech fauna). Živa 64(1): 31–34. https://ziva.avcr.cz/files/ziva/pdf/hlemyzd-pruhovany-novy-druh-pro-evropskou-i-ceskou.pdf [Google Scholar]
  43. Korábek O, Juřičková L, Balashov I, Petrusek A. (2018) The contribution of ancient and modern anthropogenic introductions to the colonization of Europe by the land snail Helixlucorum Linnaeus, 1758 (Helicidae). Contributions to Zoology 87(2): 61–74. 10.1163/18759866-08702001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Korábek O, Juřičková L, Petrusek A. (2020) Inferring the sources of postglacial range expansion in two large European land snails. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 58(4): 944–956. 10.1111/jzs.12368 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Korábek O, Kosová T, Dolejš P, Petrusek A, Neubert E, Juřičková L. (2021) Geographic isolation and human-assisted dispersal in land snails: a Mediterranean story of Helixborealis and its relatives (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora: Helicidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 193(4): 1310–1335. 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa186 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Korábek O, Juřičková L, Petrusek A. (2022) Diversity of land snail tribe Helicini (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora: Helicidae): where do we stand after 20 years of sequencing mitochondrial markers? Diversity 14(1): 1–24. 10.3390/d14010024 [DOI]
  47. Korábek O, Balashov I, Neiber MT, Walther F, Hausdorf B. (2023a) The Caucasus is neither a cradle nor a museum of diversity of the land snail genus Helix (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora, Helicidae), while Crimea is home to an ancient lineage. Zoosystematics and Evolution 99(2): 535–543. 10.3897/zse.99.110610 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Korábek O, Adamcová T, Proćków M, Petrusek A, Hausdorf B, Juřičková L. (2023b) In both directions: Expansions of European land snails to the north and south from glacial refugia. Journal of Biogeography 50(4): 654–668. 10.1111/jbi.14531 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kotsakiozi P, Pafilis P, Giokas S, Valakos E. (2012) A comparison of the physiological responses of two land snail species with different distributional ranges. The Journal of Molluscan Studies 78(2): 217–224. 10.1093/mollus/eys003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Letourneux A. (1884) Excursions malacologiques dans l’île Santorin. Bulletins de la Société malacologique de France 1: 287–304. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/14890924 [Google Scholar]
  51. Linnaeus C. (1758) Systema Naturae, per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata. Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm. 10.5962/bhl.title.542 [DOI]
  52. Maroulis L, Karakasi D, Bitzilekis E, Dalias P, Mylonas M, Vardinoyannis K. (2024) The terrestrial gastropods in three Dodecanese islands, Rhodes, Symi, Chalki (Aegean Sea, Greece). Folia Malacologica 32(1): 1–18. 10.12657/folmal.032.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Maroulis L, Poulakakis N, Proios K, Karakasi D, Triantis KA, Mylonas M, Vardinoyannis K. (2025) On the path to extinction: Helixgodetiana Kobelt, 1878, the only threatened Helix species in Greece. Nature Conservation 58: 1–10. 10.3897/natureconservation.58.129016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Mason K, Fehér Z, Bamberger S, Reier S, Szekeres M, Sattmann H, Kruckenhauser L, De Mattia W, Haring E. (2020) New insights into and limitations of the molecular phylogeny in the taxon‐rich land snail genus Montenegrina (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Clausiliidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 58(3): 662–690. 10.1111/jzs.12413 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, Lanfear R. (2020) IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37(5): 1530–1534. 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. MolluscaBase [Eds] (2024) Helix Linnaeus, 1758. MolluscaBase. https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=153970 [Accessed on 08.10.2024]
  57. Mousson A. (1854) Coquilles terrestres et fluviatiles recueillies par M. le Prof. Bellardi dans un voyage en Orient. Zürcher & Furrer, Zürich, 59 pp. [1 pl.] 10.5962/bhl.title.101714 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Mousson A. (1859) Coquilles terrestres et fluviatiles, recueillies dans l’Orient par M. le Dr. Alex. Schläfli. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich 4: 12–36. [253–297.] 10.5962/bhl.title.101882 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mylonas M. (1985) The distribution and ecology of the species Helixgodetiana Kobelt (Gastropoda: Pulmonata). Biologia Gallo-Hellenica 10: 139–142. [Google Scholar]
  60. Mylonas M, Vardinoyannis K. (2022) The terrestrial malacofauna of the southeast-central Aegean islets. Journal of Conchology 44: 317–334. https://conchsoc.org/sites/default/files/jconch/44/4/2022-44401.pdf [Google Scholar]
  61. Mylonas M, Vardinoyannis K, Poulakakis N. (2019) A contribution to knowledge on the terrestrial malacofauna of the Kastellorizo (Megisti) island group (SE Greece). Journal of Biological Research 26(1): 1–13. 10.1186/s40709-019-0107-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Nägele G. (1901) Einige Neuheiten aus Vorderasien. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 33: 16–31. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/15598559 [Google Scholar]
  63. Neiber MT, Korábek O, Glaubrecht M, Hausdorf B. (2022) A misinterpreted disjunction: the phylogenetic relationships of the North African land snail Gyrostomella (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora: Helicidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 194(4): 1236–1251. 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab059 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Neubert E. (2014) Revision of Helix Linnaeus, 1758 in its eastern Mediterranean distribution area, and reassignment of Helixgodetiana Kobelt, 1878 to Maltzanella Hesse, 1917 (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Helicidae). Contributions to Natural History 26: 1–200. https://www.e-periodica.ch/digbib/view?pid=cnh-001%3A2014%3A0%3A%3A253#255 [Google Scholar]
  65. Neubert E, Bank RA. (2006) Notes on the species of Caucasotachea C. Boettger 1909 and Lindholmia P. Hesse 1919, with annotations to the Helicidae (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora: Helicidae). Archiv für Molluskenkunde der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 135(1): 101–132. 10.1127/arch.moll/0003-9284/135/101-132 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Nordsieck H. (1987) Revision des Systems der Helicoidea (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora). Archiv für Molluskenkunde 118: 9–50. https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/Archiv-fuer-Molluskenkunde_118_0009-0050.pdf [Google Scholar]
  67. Petraccioli A, Niero I, Carandente F, Crovato P, de Vico G, Odierna G, Picariello OLA, Tardy E, Viglietti S, Guarino FM, Maio N. (2021) Helixstraminea Briganti, 1825 in Italy (Gastropoda: Pulmonata): taxonomic history, morphology, biology, distribution and phylogeny. The European Zoological Journal 88(1): 390–416. 10.1080/24750263.2021.1892217 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Psonis N, Vardinoyannis K, Mylonas M, Poulakakis N. (2015) Evaluation of the taxonomy of Helixcincta (Muller, 1774) and Helixnucula (Mousson, 1854); insights using mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Journal of Natural History 49(5–8): 383–392. 10.1080/00222933.2013.825023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rafinesque CS. (1815) Analyse de la nature ou Tableau de l’univers et des corps organisés. Self-published, Palermo, 224 pp. 10.5962/bhl.title.106607 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Razkin O, Gómez-Moliner BJ, Prieto CE, Martínez-Ortí A, Arrébola JR, Muñoz B, Chueca LJ, Madeira MJ. (2015) Molecular phylogeny of the western Palaearctic Helicoidea (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 83: 99–117. 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.11.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Reischütz A, Reischütz PL, Szekeres M. (2016) The Clausiliidae subfamily Phaedusinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) in the Balkans. Nachrichtenblatt der Ersten Vorarlberger Malakologischen Gesellschaft 23: 93–117. [Google Scholar]
  72. Rolle H. (1898) Eine neue Pomatia. Nachrichtsblatt der deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 30: 91–92. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28228509 [Google Scholar]
  73. Rossmässler EA. (1838–1844) Iconographie der Land- & Süßwasser- Mollusken, mit vorzüglicher Berücksichtigung der europäischen noch nicht abgebildeten Arten. [II. Band]. Arnoldische Buchhandlung, Dresden/Leipzig, (Heft 1/2): 4 + 1–44. [pls 31–40 [1838]; (Heft 3/4): I–IV + 1–46. pls 41–50 [1839]; (Heft 5): I–IV + 1–15. pls 51–55 [1842]; (Heft 6): I–IV + 1–37. pls 56–60 [1844].] https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/24986501
  74. Scheel BM, Hausdorf B. (2012) Survival and differentiation of subspecies of the land snail Charpentieriaitala in mountain refuges in the southern Alps: Differentiation in mountain refuges. Molecular Ecology 21(15): 3794–3808. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05649.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Schenková V, Horsák M. (2013) Refugial populations of Vertigolilljeborgi and V.genesii (Vertiginidae): New isolated occurrences in Central Europe, ecology and distribution. American Malacological Bulletin 31(2): 323–329. 10.4003/006.031.0211 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Schileyko AA. (1978) Nazemnye mollyuski nadsemeystva Helicoidea. In: Skarlato OA. (Ed.) Fauna SSSR.Mollyuski. Nauka, Leningrad 3(6), 1–384.
  77. Sokolov EP. (2000) An improved method for DNA isolation from mucopolysaccharide-rich molluscan tissues. The Journal of Molluscan Studies 66(4): 573–575. 10.1093/mollus/66.4.573 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. von Martens E. (1889) Griechische Mollusken. Gesammelt von Eberh. von Örtzen. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 55: 169–240. [pls 9–11.] https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/6236939 [Google Scholar]
  79. Vu VQ, Friendly M, Tavadyan A. (2024) Package ‘ggbiplot’ https://github.com/friendly/ggbiplot [Accessed on 14.10.2024].
  80. Welter-Schultes FW. (1998) Die Landschnecken der griechischen Insel Gávdos, der südlichsten Insel Europas. Schriften zur Malakozoologie 12: 1–120. [Google Scholar]
  81. Welter-Schultes FW. (2012) European Non-Marine Molluscs, a Guide for Species Identification. Planet Poster Editions, Göttingen, 679 pp. [Google Scholar]
  82. Westerlund CA, Blanc H. (1879) Aperçu sur la Faune Malacologique de la Grèce Inclus l’Epire et la Thessalie. Coquilles extramarines, 161 pp. [+ errata (1 pp.), pls 1–4.] https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=sourceget&id=298691

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Helicidae
XML Treatment for Helicinae
XML Treatment for Helicini
XML Treatment for Helix
XML Treatment for Helix
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) pelagonesicapelagonesica
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) pelagonesicathembones
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) schlaeflii
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) straminea
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) thessalica
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) philibinensis
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) borealis
XML Treatment for Helix (Helix) lucorum
XML Treatment for Pelasga
XML Treatment for Helix (Pelasga) figulina
Supplementary material 1

List of samples used in the phylogenetic analysis with locality and voucher information and GenBank accession numbers

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Ondřej Korábek, Petr Dolejš, Radovan Coufal, Lucie Juřičková, Kateřina Kubíková, Bernhard Hausdorf

Data type

ods

Data Availability Statement

Nucleotide sequences were deposited in the NCBI Nucleotide database; accession numbers are listed in the Supplementary Information.


Articles from ZooKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES