Abstract
In September 2018, Hurricane Florence resulted in major flooding in North Carolina, USA. Efforts to isolate Listeria monocytogenes and other Listeria spp. from Hurricane Florence floodwaters repeatedly yielded non-haemolytic Listeria-like isolates that could not be readily assigned to known Listeria taxa. Whole-genome sequence analyses against the 28 currently known Listeria species confirmed that the isolates constitute two new taxa within the genus Listeria. Taxon I, with one isolate, showed the highest similarity to Listeria goaensis, with an average nucleotide identity blast of 85.3±4.4% and an in silico DNA–DNA hybridization (isDDH) of 32.4% (range: 30–35%), differing from the latter by its ability to reduce nitrate, ferment d-ribose and sucrose, and by its inability to produce catalase or ferment d-trehalose and d-lactose. Taxon II, represented by 11 isolates, showed the highest similarity to Listeria rocourtiae, with an average nucleotide identity blast of 92.64±3.8% and an isDDH of 49.9% (range: 47.3–52.5%), differing from the latter by its ability to ferment l-arabinose and its inability to ferment l-rhamnose, d-galactose, d-lactose and d-melibiose. The names Listeria tempestatis sp. nov. and Listeria rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. are proposed for taxon I and II, respectively, with type strains CLIP 2022/01175T (F6L-1A=CIP 112444T = DSM 117029T) and CLIP 2022/01000T (F66L-1A=CIP 112443T = DSM 117030T), respectively. Both taxa lack known Listeria pathogenic islands, suggesting a lack of pathogenicity for humans.
Keywords: average nucleotide identity (ANI), Firmicutes, in silico DNA–DNA hybridization (isDDH), Listeria, new taxa, whole-genome sequencing
Introduction
The genus Listeria belongs to the phylum Bacillota, consisting of Gram-positive, rod-shaped bacteria that are typically catalase positive, oxidase negative and have a low G+C content [1]. Currently, 28 Listeria species have been described, with 22 identified only since 2010, largely due to increased efforts to isolate Listeria from diverse sources, especially aquatic ecosystems, the increased availability of whole-genome sequencing and the use of whole-genome sequence data in taxonomic classification. The genus Listeria can be partitioned into two major clades [2,3]: (i) Listeria sensu stricto, with ten species (L. monocytogenes [4], L. innocua [5], L. welshimeri [6], L. seeligeri [6], L. ivanovii [7], L. marthii [8], L. cossartiae [9], L. farberi [9], L. immobilis [9] and ‘L. swaminathanii’ [10]) and (ii) Listeria sensu lato, containing 18 species (L. grayi [11], L. rocourtiae [12], L. weihenstephanensis [13], L. aquatica [14], L. cornellensis [14], L. fleishchmannii [14], L. floridensis [14], L. grandensis [14], L. riparia [14], L. booriae [15], L. newyorkensis [15], L. costaricensis [16], L. goaensis [17], L. thailandensis [18], L. valentina [19], L. rustica [9], L. portnoyi [9] and L. ilorinensis [20]). All species are non-pathogenic except for L. monocytogenes, which is considered the only human pathogen in the genus Listeria, and L. ivanovii, which predominantly infects ruminants and, rarely, humans [21]. L. monocytogenes represents an important concern for food safety and public health due to the severe symptoms and high case-fatality and hospitalization rates of listeriosis [2,22].
In September 2018, Hurricane Florence caused massive flooding of many inland rivers and other locations in eastern North Carolina, USA, a largely rural region highly dense in facilities producing and processing food animals, especially swine and poultry [23,24]. Samples from Hurricane Florence floodwaters were collected and analysed for L. monocytogenes and other Listeria species, as well as other bacterial pathogens [25,26]. Several Listeria-like isolates that could not be readily assigned to published Listeria taxa were identified. Here, genotypic and phenotypic analyses were conducted to designate appropriate taxonomic classifications for 12 of these isolates.
Methods
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
Unless stated otherwise, all isolates were grown in brain heart infusion (BHI) at 37 °C for 24 h, and strains used as controls were L. booriae CLIP 2016/00711, L. ivanovii subsp. ivanovii CLIP 12510T, L. ivanovii subsp. londonensis CLIP 12229T, L. valentina CLIP 2019/00642T (DSM 110544T), L. thailandensis CLIP 2015/00305T (DSM 107638T) and/or L. monocytogenes CLIP 74910 (ATCC 19115), as described below. L. rocourtiae CIP 109804T and L. goaensis CLIP 2022/00569T (KCTC 33909T), the closest species to the new taxa, were included in all experiments.
Floodwater samples were analysed for Listeria spp. as previously described [27]. Briefly, for primary enrichments, 1.25 ml of the water samples were mixed with 11.25 ml of half Fraser broth supplemented with half Fraser selective supplement (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) and incubated at 30 °C for 24–48 h. Secondary enrichments consisted of 100 µl of the primary enrichment in 10 ml of full Fraser broth with full Fraser selective supplement (Oxoid) and were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. The primary and secondary enrichments (20 µl) were plated on modified Oxford medium (MOX; Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD, USA) and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Colonies typical of Listeria spp. (round, black in colour, smooth, flat or slightly convex in shape) were purified on blood agar plates (trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood; Remel, San Diego, CA, USA) and analysed via multiplex PCR to determine tentative serogroup designations as described [28,29]. Twelve Listeria-like isolates that failed to yield an amplicon were sent to the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre Listeria (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France) for identification and further characterization.
Species identification, genome sequencing and analysis
Initial efforts for species identification employed the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry Sirius system and the MBT library version 12.0.0.0 (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) [30]. For DNA sequence-based identification, genomic DNA was extracted using the NucleoSpin Tissue purification kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) from 0.9 ml of cultures grown overnight in brain heart infusion (BHI, Difco, France) at 35 °C. DNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT DNA Sample kit (Illumina, California, USA) and sequenced with Illumina NextSeq 500 using a 2×150 bp paired-end run. Raw reads were trimmed with fqCleanER v.21.10 (https://gitlab.pasteur.fr/GIPhy/fqCleanER) as previously described [31] and assembled with SPAdes v.3.14 [32] with the automatic k-mer, --only-assembler and --careful options. Contigs longer than 300 bp were annotated with Prokka v.1.14 [33], and screening for plasmids utilized MOB-suite v.2.0.1 [34]. In addition, the 16S rRNA gene was amplified with primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) [35] and amplicons were Sanger sequenced.
Phylogenetic analyses were performed based on the nucleotide sequences of the 16S rRNA genes and on the core genome alignment of all Listeria species, defined using Roary v.3.13 [36] and a BLASTP identity cut-off of 80% to identify orthologs [20]. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were constructed using IQ-Tree v.2.2 [37], and the best fit substitution models (TPM3u+F+I+G4 for 16S rRNA and GTR+F+I+G4 for the core genome) were identified using ModelFinder [38] and visualized in mega v.7.0 [39]. The average nucleotide identity (ANIb) shared with other Listeria species was determined using the enveomics package [40], with the blastn settings defined as in JSpecies v1.2.1 and Goris et al. [41]. Dendrograms based on the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) method were obtained from the distance matrices using BioNumerics v.7.6 (Applied Maths, Belgium). The average in silico DNA–DNA hybridization (isDDH) similarities were calculated using the GGDC 2.1 web server and formula 2 [sum of all identities found in high-scoring segment pairs (HSP) divided by overall HSP length] [42]. In silico PCR-serogrouping profiles were obtained from the draft genomes as described previously [28,36].
Phenotypic characterization
Gram staining was performed with the Color Gram 2 kit (bioMérieux, Marcy I’Etoile, France), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Catalase and oxidase activities were determined using the API ID Color Catalase kit (bioMérieux) and the Bactident Oxidase test strips (Merck Millipore, France), respectively, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Respiratory characteristics were determined in tubes containing meat liver agar (Bio-Rad, France) at 30 °C after 24 h, following the manufacturer’s instructions. The presence of a capsule was assessed using India ink staining. Growth characteristics were determined on BHI agar and broth at 4 °C for 10 days and at 22, 37 and 42 °C for 7 days. Growth was considered positive if there was an increase in cell number of at least 1.0 log (c.f.u./ml−1). Isolates were grown on Rapid’L.mono agar (Bio-Rad) and Agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti (ALOA; bioMérieux) plates at 30 and 37 °C for 24 h.
Motility was tested by stab inoculation in U-shaped glass tubes containing tryptic soy semi-solid agar (Bio-Rad), followed by incubation at 22 and 37 °C for 7 days in aerobic conditions. Haemolytic activity was assessed both by growth on sheep blood agar plates as described above and by stabbing the isolates into Columbia agar plates (bioMérieux) containing 5% defibrinated horse blood, as described in the Bacteriological Analytical Manual [43], followed by incubation for 24 h at 37 °C. The Christie, Atkins, Munch-Petersen (CAMP) test was performed as previously described, by streaking isolates and controls horizontally on Columbia agar containing 5% defibrinated sheep blood (bioMérieux), together with Rhodococcus equi NCTC 1621, which was streaked vertically. L. ivanovii was used as a positive control, while L. rocourtiae and L. goaensis were used as negative controls. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and examined for enhanced haemolysis at the confluence of the horizontal and vertical streaks.
Nitrate reduction was determined by inoculation in nitrate broth (bioMérieux) and incubation at 37 °C for 5 days, with L. rocourtiae used as a positive control, while L. goaensis and L. monocytogenes were used as negative controls. Carbohydrate fermentation profiles were determined with API Listeria and the API50CH system (bioMérieux), following the manufacturer’s recommendations, using L. monocytogenes, L. rocourtiae and L. goaensis as controls and following incubation at 37 °C for 24 h. The production of acetoin from glucose fermentation (Voges-Proskauer test) was assessed using API20E strips (bioMérieux) and recorded after incubation at 37 °C for 24 h. L. monocytogenes, L. booriae, L. rocourtiae and L. goaensis were used as controls.
Antimicrobial susceptibility
Susceptibility to antimicrobials was determined with the disc diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar plates (Bio-Rad) at 30 °C, following the recommendations from the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST, https://www.eucast.org/). The following antibiotic discs (Bio-Rad) were used: amoxicillin (25 µg), ampicillin (10 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), fosfomycin (50 µg), fusidic acid (10 µg), gentamicin (15 µg), imipenem (10 µg), kanamycin (30 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), penicillin G (6 µg), moxifloxacin (5 µg), nalidixic acid (30 µg), rifampicin (30 µg), streptomycin (10 µg), sulphonamides (200 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), trimethoprim (5 µg) and vancomycin (30 µg). The diameters of inhibition zones were measured with the automatic reader Scan 4000 (Interscience, France).
Results and discussion
MALDI-TOF identification
Species identification efforts using the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry Sirius system and the MBT library version 12.0.0.0 [30] were inconclusive for nine isolates (scores <2.00, indicative of Listeria spp.) and indicative of L. newyorkensis for three isolates (scores 2.02–2.05).
Genome sequence and analyses
Sequence metrics of the 12 isolates (Table 1) met the quality standards for taxonomic determination [44]. Draft assemblies ranged between 2.8 and 3.4 Mb and had a G+C content between 38.6 and 40.6 mol% (Table 1), similar to other species of the genus Listeria (2.6 and 3.5 Mb, 35.9 and 43.6 mol% G+C). No plasmids were detected in any of the 12 isolates. Sequence-based serogrouping by analysis of the multiplex PCR target sequences revealed the prs gene (serogroup L, typical of non-L. monocytogenes species and certain uncommon L. monocytogenes serotypes) in both new taxa. The 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity of the two taxa (Suppl. Fig. 1, available in the online version of this article) was 100% with L. rocourtiae and 99.4% with L. fleischmannii, thus above the proposed cut-off of 98.7–99.0% [45], below which strains do not belong to the same species, and confirming the lack of adequate resolution of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for species delimitation.
Table 1. Genome metrics of isolates obtained in this study.
Isolate* | Alias | Geographic location | Geographic coordinates | Isolation date | No. of reads | Coverage (x) | No. of contigs | Total length (bp) | N50 | GC% | Closest species | ANIb with closest species | isDDH with closest species | SRA accession no. | BIGSdb id |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. tempestatis sp. nov. | |||||||||||||||
CLIP 2022/01775T | F6L-1A | Grifton, NC, USA | 35.38 N, −77.45 W | 2018-09-21 | 5.94E+06 | 318 | 38 | 2.83E+06 | 3.04E+05 | 38.6 | L. goaensis | 85.3±4.36% | 32.4% (30.0–35.0%) |
ERR12145462 | 98880 |
L. rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. | |||||||||||||||
CLIP 2022/01000T | F66L-1A | Fairmont, NC, USA | 34.55 N, −79.19 W | 2018-10-18 | 9.58E+06 | 449 | 124 | 3.28E+06 | 6.60E+04 | 40.5 | L. rocourtiae | 92.1±4.8% | 49.9% (47.3–52.5%) |
ERR12145451 | 84502 |
CLIP 2022/01784 | F61L-2A | Lumberton, NC, USA | 34.62 N, −79.01 W | 2018-10-18 | 5.92E+06 | 277 | 112 | 3.24E+06 | 6.66E+04 | 40.6 | L. rocourtiae | 92.0±4.92% | 49.5% (46.9–52.2%) |
ERR12145452 | 98889 |
CLIP 2022/01786 | F67L-1A | Fairmont, NC, USA | 34.53 N, −79.17 W | 2018-10-18 | 6.18E+06 | 290 | 111 | 3.30E+06 | 6.72E+04 | 40.6 | L. rocourtiae | 92.1±4.83% | 49.4% (46.7–52.0%) |
ERR12145453 | 98891 |
CLIP 2022/01787 | F67L-2A | Fairmont, NC, USA | 34.53 N, −79.17 W | 2018-10-18 | 5.62E+06 | 263 | 104 | 3.23E+06 | 7.07E+04 | 40.5 | L. rocourtiae | 92.2±4.53% | 49.9% (47.3–52.6%) |
ERR12145454 | 98892 |
CLIP 2022/01789 | F70L-1A | Goldsboro, NC, USA | 35.38 N, −77.82 W | 2018-10-18 | 5.52E+06 | 259 | 104 | 3.34E+06 | 7.33E+04 | 40.6 | L. rocourtiae | 92.1±4.86% | 49.4% (46.7–52.0%) |
ERR12145455 | 98894 |
CLIP 2022/01790 | F70L-2A | Goldsboro, NC, USA | 35.38 N, −77.82 W | 2018-10-18 | 6.08E+06 | 285 | 352 | 3.36E+06 | 7.47E+04 | 40.5 | L. rocourtiae | 92.2±4.47% | 49.9% (47.3–52.6%) |
ERR12145456 | 98895 |
CLIP 2022/01795 | F79L-2A | Goldsboro, NC, USA | 35.38 N, −77.87 W | 2018-10-18 | 5.92E+06 | 277 | 115 | 3.30E+06 | 7.34E+04 | 40.6 | L. rocourtiae | 92.0±4.93% | 49.4% (46.8–52.0%) |
ERR12145457 | 98900 |
CLIP 2022/01796 | F84L-1A | Goldsboro, NC, USA | 35.38 N, −77.82 W | 2018-10-18 | 6.51E+06 | 305 | 101 | 3.29E+06 | 7.41E+04 | 40.6 | L. rocourtiae | 92.0±4.86% | 49.4% (46.8–52.0%) |
ERR12145458 | 98901 |
CLIP 2022/01797 | F86L-2A | Piney Green, NC, USA | 35.11 N, −78.48 W | 2018-10-18 | 6.25E+06 | 293 | 103 | 3.23E+06 | 7.83E+04 | 40.5 | L. rocourtiae | 92.3±4.46% | 50.0% (47.3–52.6%) |
ERR12145459 | 98902 |
CLIP 2022/01798 | F89L-2A | Comfort, NC, USA | 35.00 N, −77.48 W | 2018-10-18 | 6.43E+06 | 301 | 112 | 3.30E+06 | 6.72E+04 | 40.6 | L. rocourtiae | 92.0±4.91% | 49.4% (46.8–52.0%) |
ERR12145460 | 98903 |
CLIP 2022/01799 | F101L-2A | Northwest, NC, USA | 34.32 N, −78.18 W | 2018-10-19 | 4.45E+06 | 208 | 110 | 3.29E+06 | 6.62E+04 | 40.6 | L. rocourtiae | 92.0±4.90% | 49.4% (46.8–52.0%) |
ERR12145461 | 98904 |
*CLIP, Collection Listeria Institut Pasteur.
Core genome analyses based on the 305 genes present in 95–100% of Listeria species representatives (Fig. 1) showed the highest sequence similarity of the two taxa with L. rocourtiae and L. goaensis. Isolates shared less than 95% ANIb and 70% isDDH (Table 1 and Suppl. Fig. 2), the proposed genomic cut-offs for species identification [44], with all known species. The mostly closely related species to the first taxon (11 isolates: CLIP 2022/01000T, CLIP 2022/01784, CLIP 2022/01786, CLIP 2022/01787, CLIP 2022/01789, CLIP 2022/01790, CLIP 2022/01795, CLIP 2022/01796, CLIP 2022/01797, CLIP 2022/01798 and CLIP 2022/01799) with a validly published name was L. rocourtiae (CLIP 2022/01000T: two-way ANIb of 92.10±4.78%, based on 14,248 genome fragments; isDDH of 49.9% [47.3–52.5%]) and the most closely related species to the second taxon (one isolate: CLIP 2022/01775T) was L. goaensis (CLIP 2022/01775T: two-way ANIb of 85.26±4.36% based on 12,669 genome fragments; isDDH of 32.4% [30.0–35.0%]). These results confirmed that the 12 isolates constitute two distinct novel taxa within the Listeria genus, for which the names Listeria rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. (11 isolates) and Listeria tempestatis sp. nov. (1 isolate) are proposed.
Fig. 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis based on the core gene alignment of 35 Listeria reference strains and the 12 isolates of this study. Distance estimation was obtained by the GTR+F+I+G4 model [38], based on an alignment of 80,539 positions. Branch lengths represent the number of nucleotide substitutions per site, and bootstrap percentages of 1,000 replicates are shown. GenBank accession numbers are provided in brackets. Listeria tempestatis sp. nov. and Listeria rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. are highlighted in bold.
Phenotypic characterisation
L. tempestatis sp. nov. and all isolates of L. rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. were Gram-positive bacilli without endospores or capsules, facultative anaerobic and oxidase negative. On Rapid’L.mono agar, colonies were white, indicating no phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) activity, surrounded by a yellow halo (d-xylose fermentation). On ALOA, colonies were blue (β-glucosidase activity) without halos (no PI-PLC activity).
Neither L. tempestatis sp. nov. nor any of the isolates of L. rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. were motile at 22 or 37 °C, consistent with the absence of motility genes in their genomes. L. tempestatis sp. nov. and all isolates of L. rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. were also negative for haemolysis and the CAMP tests, consistent with the absence of known Listeria pathogenicity islands within their draft genomes, as observed in all other Listeria sensu lato species.
Similarly to most Listeria species except L. costaricensis and L. ilorinensis, all isolates of L. rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. were catalase positive. In contrast, and differing in this regard from most Listeria species, including its closest relative L. goaensis, L. tempestatis sp. nov. was catalase negative, consistent with the absence of catalase genes in its genome.
L. tempestatis sp. nov. was able to grow at all tested temperatures except at 4 °C, similarly to its closest species, L. goaensis. On the other hand, all isolates of L. rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. were able to grow at all tested temperatures except at 42 °C, similarly to L. rocourtiae subsp. rocourtiae subsp. nov.
Biochemical characterization of L. rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. and L. tempestatis sp. nov. is summarized in Suppl. Table 1. L. tempestatis sp. nov. was able to reduce nitrate, contrary to its closest species, L. goaensis. All isolates of L. rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. were able to reduce nitrate, similarly to L. rocourtiae subsp. rocourtiae subsp. nov.
Carbohydrate fermentation profiles play an important role in Listeria characterization, as these profiles help differentiate between species based on metabolic capabilities. L. tempestatis sp. nov. was able to ferment amygdalin, arbutin, d-cellobiose, d-xylose, aesculin ferric citrate, d-fructose, gentiobiose, d-glucose, d-maltose, d-mannitol, methyl-α-d-glucopyranoside, d-mannose, N-acetylglucosamine, l-rhamnose, d-ribose, d-saccharose, salicin and xylitol. d-Arabitol fermentation was variable depending on substrate concentration [negative in API50CH (1.4 mg) but positive in API Listeria (0.4 mg); Suppl. Table 1].
All isolates of L. rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. were able to ferment the following substrates: amygdalin, arbutin, d-cellobiose, d-xylose, aesculin ferric citrate, d-fructose, gentiobiose, d-glucose, l-arabinose, d-maltose (weak), methyl-α-d-glucopyranoside, d-mannose, N-acetylglucosamine, d-ribose, salicin and d-trehalose. Similarly to certain Listeria sensu lato species, including L. booriae, L. rocourtiae and L. goaensis, the Voges-Proskauer test was negative for L. tempestatis sp. nov. and for all isolates of L. rocourtiae subsp. hofi sp. nov.
UPGMA analysis of all species phenotypic traits also showed that L. tempestatis sp. nov. is closest to L. goaensis, differing from the latter only by its ability to ferment d-ribose and sucrose and its inability to ferment d-trehalose or d-lactose, as well as being positive for nitrate reductase and negative for catalase (Table S1). All isolates of L. rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. differ from L. rocourtiae subsp. rocourtiae subsp. nov. by their ability to ferment l-arabinose and inability to ferment l-rhamnose, d-galactose, d-lactose and d-melibiose. These specific differences in carbohydrate metabolism are important species-differentiating factors and should be considered for precise identification in the absence of whole-genome sequencing.
L. tempestatis sp. nov. was sensitive to all tested antibiotics, except amoxicillin, ampicillin, cefotaxime and penicillin, which resulted in no detectable inhibition halo. All isolates of L. rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. were sensitive to all tested antibiotics, except to clindamycin and fosfomycin, for which no inhibition halo was detected. Genes conferring resistance towards antibiotics or tolerance towards disinfectants were not detected. The observed resistance traits were shared with their closest respective species, suggestive of intrinsic resistance mechanisms as reported for these antibiotics in L. monocytogenes [46].
In conclusion, this study reports the discovery of two novel Listeria taxa, L. tempestatis sp. nov. and L. rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov., isolated from hurricane floodwaters, expanding our understanding of the Listeria genus. Continued investigations into Listeria diversity are crucial to identify characterize new taxa, especially from previously understudied sources such as the aquatic ecosystem. Such investigations can offer insights into Listeria evolution, ecology and adaptations and into potential impacts of this ubiquitous genus of bacteria on public health and food and water safety, particularly in the context of current global environmental changes.
Description of Listeria tempestatis sp. nov.
Listeria tempestatis sp. nov. (tem.pes.ta'tis. L. gen. n. tempestatis, meaning ‘of a storm’; named after the hurricane floodwaters from which the strain was originally isolated).
Cells are straight, Gram-stain-positive, non-spore-forming and non-encapsulated short rods. Facultative anaerobic, catalase negative and oxidase negative. Colonies are opaque with a flat shape and entire margins on BHI. On ALOA, colonies exhibit blue colour (due to β-glucosidase activity) without a surrounding halo (lack of PI-PLC activity), typical of Listeria non-haemolytic species. Growth occurs at 22–42 °C, with optimal growth between 22 and 37 °C. Non-motile at both 22 and 37 °C. Negative for haemolysis and nitrite reduction but positive for nitrate reduction. Voges-Proskauer test negative. After 24 h, acid is produced from amygdalin, arbutin, d-cellobiose, d-xylose, aesculin ferric citrate, d-fructose, gentiobiose, d-glucose, d-maltose, methyl-α-d-glucopyranoside, d-mannose, N-acetylglucosamine, l-rhamnose, d-ribose, d-saccharose and salicin. Phenotypically, L. tempestatis sp. nov. can be differentiated from its current closest species, L. goaensis, by its ability to reduce nitrate and ferment d-ribose and sucrose, and its inability to produce catalase or ferment d-trehalose.
The type strain CLIP 2022/01775 (F6L-1A) was isolated on 18 October 2018 from floodwaters produced by Hurricane Florence in eastern North Carolina, USA. The genomic DNA G+C content of the type strain is 38.64 mol%. The type strain is deposited at the Leibniz Institute DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms (DSM 117029T) and the Collection of Institut Pasteur (CIP 112444T). The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequence and the draft genome of the type strain are OR195332 and CAUYTK01, respectively.
Description of Listeria rocourtiae subsp. rocourtiae subsp. nov.
Listeria rocourtiae subsp. rocourtiae subsp. nov. (ro.cour′ti.ae. N.L. fem. gen. n. rocourtiae, named after the French bacteriologist Jocelyne Rocourt).
General characteristics have been previously described [12]. Cells are Gram-stain-positive, non-spore-forming short rods. Facultative anaerobic, non-haemolytic, catalase positive, nitrate reduction positive and oxidase negative. Colonies are round with a low convex and entire margin on trypto-casein-soy agar when incubated at 30 °C. Growth occurs at 4–37 °C. After 24 h, acid is produced from l-galactose, d-glucose, glycerol, d-lactose, d-maltose, d-mannitol, d-melibiose, methyl α-d-glucopyranoside, l-rhamnose, d-ribose, d-xylose, N-acetylglucosamine, amygdalin, arbutin, d-cellobiose, d-fructose, d-mannose and salicin.
The type strain is strain CIP 109804T (=DSM 22097T =Allerberger 700284/02T).
Description of Listeria rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov.
Listeria rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. (ho’fi N.L. masc. n. hofi, named in honour of Dr Herbert Hof, for his research and other pioneering contributions on Listeria monocytogenes and listeriosis).
Cells are straight, Gram-stain-positive, non-spore-forming and non-encapsulated short rods. Facultative anaerobic, catalase positive and oxidase negative. Colonies are opaque with a flat shape and entire margins on BHI. On ALOA, colonies exhibit blue colour (due to β-glucosidase activity) without a surrounding halo (lack of PI-PLC activity), typical of non-haemolytic Listeria species. Growth occurs at 4–37 °C, with optimal growth at 30 °C. Non-motile at both 22 and 37 °C. Negative for haemolysis and nitrite reduction but positive for nitrate reduction. Voges-Proskauer test negative.
After 24 h, acid is produced from amygdalin, arbutin, d-cellobiose, d-xylose, aesculin ferric citrate, d-fructose, gentiobiose, d-glucose, l-arabinose, d-maltose (weak), methyl-α-d-glucopyranoside, d-mannose, N-acetylglucosamine, d-ribose, salicin and d-trehalose. d-Arabitol fermentation is variable depending on substrate concentration, being negative in API50CH (1.4 mg) but positive in API Listeria (0.4 mg). The production of acid from glycerol is variable among the isolates. Phenotypically, all isolates of L. rocourtiae subsp. hofi subsp. nov. can be differentiated from L. rocourtiae subsp. rocourtiae subsp. nov. by their ability to ferment l-arabinose and inability to ferment l-rhamnose, d-galactose, d-lactose and d-melibiose.
The type strain CLIP 2022/01000 (F66L-1A) was isolated on 18 October 2018 from floodwaters produced by Hurricane Florence in eastern North Carolina, USA. The genomic DNA G+C content of the type strain is 40.48 mol%. The type strain is deposited at the Leibniz Institute DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms (DSM 117030T) and the Collection of Institut Pasteur (CIP 112443T). The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequence and draft genome of the type strain are OR195334 and CAUYTL01, respectively.
Supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the P2M platform (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France) for genome sequencing and the Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection for Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH (Braunschweig, Germany) and the Collection of Institut Pasteur (Paris, France) for depositing the type strains in their collections.
Abbreviations
- AAI
average amino acid identity
- ANI
average nucleotide identity
- BHI
brain heart infusion
- BLAST
basic local alignment search tool
- CAMP
Christie, Atkins, Munch-Petersen test
- CIP
Collection of Institut Pasteur
- CLIP
Collection Listeria Institut Pasteur
- DDBJ
DNA Data Bank of Japan
- DSMZ
German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures
- EMBL
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
- isDDH
in silico DNA–DNA hybridization
- N50
minimum contig length covering 50% of the genome
- PCR
polymerase chain reaction
- PI-PLC
phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C
- UPGMA
unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean
Footnotes
Funding: This work was supported by Institut Pasteur, Inserm and Santé Publique France. This work was partially supported by the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) North America Food Microbiology Committee. ILSI North America had no role in the design, analysis, interpretation or presentation of the data and results. Partial support was also provided by the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences and the Department of Food, Nutrition and Bioprocessing Sciences at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC USA and by award 2018–07464 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the USDA.
Contributor Information
Phillip Brown, Email: pebrown4@ncsu.edu.
Alexandra Moura, Email: amoura@pasteur.fr.
Guillaume Valès, Email: guillaume.vales@pasteur.fr.
Nathalie Tessaud-Rita, Email: nathalie.tessaud-rita@pasteur.fr.
Jefffrey Niedermeyer, Email: jeffrey.niedermeyer@gmail.com.
Cameron Parsons, Email: ctparson@gmail.com.
Alexandre Leclercq, Email: aleclercq@pasteur.fr.
Angela Harris, Email: aharris5@ncsu.edu.
Ryan E. Emanuel, Email: ryan.emanuel@duke.edu.
Sophia Kathariou, Email: skathar@ncsu.edu.
Marc Lecuit, Email: marc.lecuit@pasteur.fr.
References
- 1.De Vos P, Garrity GM, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, et al. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology: vol. 3. 2009. www.springer.com
- 2.Orsi RH, Wiedmann M. Characteristics and distribution of Listeria spp., including Listeria species newly described since 2009. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:5273–5287. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7552-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chiara M, Caruso M, D’Erchia AM, Manzari C, Fraccalvieri R, et al. Comparative genomics of Listeria sensu lato: genus-wide differences in evolutionary dynamics and the progressive gain of complex, potentially pathogenicity-related traits through lateral gene transfer. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7:2154–2172. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pirie JH. The genus Listerella Pirie. Science. 1940;91:383–383. doi: 10.1126/science.91.2364.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Seeliger HPR. Apathogene listerien: L. innocua sp.n. (Seeliger et Schoofs, 1977) Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol. 1981;249:487–493. doi: 10.1016/S0174-3031(81)80108-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rocourt J, Grimont PAD. Listeria welshimeri sp. nov. and Listeria seeligeri sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1983;33:866–869. doi: 10.1099/00207713-33-4-866. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Seeliger HPR, Rocourt J, Schrettenbrunner A, Grimont PAD, Jones D. Listeria ivanovii sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1984;34:336–337. doi: 10.1099/00207713-34-3-336. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Graves LM, Helsel LO, Steigerwalt AG, Morey RE, Daneshvar MI, et al. Listeria marthii sp. nov., isolated from the natural environment, Finger Lakes National Forest. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol . 2010;60:1280–1288. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.014118-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Carlin CR, Liao J, Weller D, Guo X, Orsi R, et al. Listeria cossartiae sp. nov., Listeria farberi sp. nov., Listeria immobilis sp. nov., Listeria portnoyi sp. nov. and Listeria rustica sp. nov., isolated from agricultural water and natural environment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71:004795. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hudson LK, Chaggar HK, Schamp CN, Claxton ML, Bryan DW, et al. Phenotypic characterization and analysis of complete genomes of two distinct strains of the proposed species “L. swaminathanii”. Sci Rep. 2022;12:9137. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13119-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Errebo Larsen H, Seeliger H. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Listeriosis. Bilthoven: 1966. A mannitol fermenting Listeria, Listeria grayi sp. n. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Leclercq A, Clermont D, Bizet C, Grimont PAD, Le Flèche-Matéos A, et al. Listeria rocourtiae sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:2210–2214. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.017376-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lang Halter E, Neuhaus K, Scherer S. Listeria weihenstephanensis sp. nov., isolated from the water plant Lemna trisulca taken from a freshwater pond. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:641–647. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.036830-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.den Bakker HC, Warchocki S, Wright EM, Allred AF, Ahlstrom C, et al. Listeria floridensis sp. nov., Listeria aquatica sp. nov., Listeria cornellensis sp. nov., Listeria riparia sp. nov. and Listeria grandensis sp. nov., from agricultural and natural environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:1882–1889. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.052720-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Weller D, Andrus A, Wiedmann M, den Bakker HC. Listeria booriae sp. nov. and Listeria newyorkensis sp. nov., from food processing environments in the USA. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65:286–292. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.070839-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Núñez-Montero K, Leclercq A, Moura A, Vales G, Peraza J, et al. Listeria costaricensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:844–850. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Doijad SP, Poharkar KV, Kale SB, Kerkar S, Kalorey DR, et al. Listeria goaensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:3285–3291. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Leclercq A, Moura A, Vales G, Tessaud-Rita N, Aguilhon C, et al. Listeria thailandensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019;69:74–81. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Quereda JJ, Leclercq A, Moura A, Vales G, Gómez-Martín Á, et al. Listeria valentina sp. nov., isolated from a water trough and the faeces of healthy sheep. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:5868–5879. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Raufu IA, Moura A, Vales G, Ahmed OA, Aremu A, et al. Listeria ilorinensis sp. nov., isolated from cow milk cheese in Nigeria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022;72 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guillet C, Join-Lambert O, Le Monnier A, Leclercq A, Mechaï F, et al. Human listeriosis caused by Listeria ivanovii. Emerg Infect Dis . 2010;16:136–138. doi: 10.3201/eid1601.091155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson M-A, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States--major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis . 2011;17:7–15. doi: 10.3201/eid1701.p11101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.National Weather Service . National Weather Service, Silver Spring, MD; 2018. Hurricane Florence: September 14, 2018.https://www.weather.gov/ilm/hurricaneflorence [Google Scholar]
- 24.Martin KL, Emanuel RE, Vose JM. Terra incognita: the unknown risks to environmental quality posed by the spatial distribution and abundance of concentrated animal feeding operations. Sci Total Environ. 2018;642:887–893. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Harris AR, Fidan EN, Nelson NG, Emanuel RE, Jass T, et al. Microbial contamination in environmental waters of rural and agriculturally-dominated landscapes following Hurricane Florence. ACS EST Water . 2021;1:2012–2019. doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.1c00103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Niedermeyer JA, Miller WG, Yee E, Harris A, Emanuel RE, et al. Search for Campylobacter spp. reveals high prevalence and pronounced genetic diversity of Arcobacter butzleri in floodwater samples associated with Hurricane Florence in North Carolina, USA. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86:e01118-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01118-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee S, Parsons C, Chen Y, Hanafy Z, Brown E, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel genomic island harboring cadmium and arsenic resistance genes in Listeria welshimeri. Biomolecules. 2021;11:560. doi: 10.3390/biom11040560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Doumith M, Buchrieser C, Glaser P, Jacquet C, Martin P. Differentiation of the major Listeria monocytogenes serovars by multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:3819–3822. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3819-3822.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Parsons C, Niedermeyer J, Gould N, Brown P, Strules J, et al. Listeria monocytogenes at the human-wildlife interface: black bears (Ursus americanus) as potential vehicles for Listeria. Microb Biotechnol. 2020;13:706–721. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Thouvenot P, Vales G, Bracq-Dieye H, Tessaud-Rita N, Maury MM, et al. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry-based identification of Listeria species in surveillance: a prospective study. J Microbiol Methods. 2018;144:29–32. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moura A, Lefrancq N, Wirth T, Leclercq A, Borges V, et al. Emergence and global spread of Listeria monocytogenes main clinical clonal complex. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabj9805. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj9805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comp Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Robertson J, Nash JHE. MOB-suite: software tools for clustering, reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assemblies. Microb Genom. 2018;4:e000206. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lane DJ. In: Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics. Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M, editors. New York, N.Y: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing; pp. 115–176. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 2017;14:587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. Peer J Prepr. 2016;4:e1900v1. doi: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1900v1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinf. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hitchins AD, Jinneman K, Chen Y. Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) - Chapter 10: detection of Listeria monocytogenes in foods and environmental samples, and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in foods. 2022. https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bacteriological-analytical-manual-bam
- 44.Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2024;74:006300. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Erko S, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today. 2006;8:6–9. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Moura A, Leclercq A, Vales G, Tessaud-Rita N, Bracq-Dieye H, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance of Listeria monocytogenes: an observational study in France. Lancet Reg Health Eur . 2024;37:100800. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.