Abstract
Paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE) is widely used in biomolecular NMR spectroscopy to obtain long-range distance and orientational information for intra- or intermolecular interactions. In contrast to conventional PRE measurements, which require tethering small molecules containing either a radical or paramagnetic ion to specific sites on the target protein, solvent PRE (sPRE) experiments utilize paramagnetic cosolutes to induce a delocalized PRE effect. Compounds developed as contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications typically consist of Gd chelated by a small molecule. Coordinating these Gd-containing small molecules to larger and inert scaffolds has been shown to increase the PRE-effect and produce more effective contrast agents in MRI. Inspired by their use as MRI contrast agent, in this work we evaluate the effectiveness of using a functionalized polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer for sPRE measurements. Using ubiquitin as a model system, we measured the sPRE effect from a generation 5 PAMAM dendrimer (G5-Gd) as a function of temperature and pH and compared to conventional relaxation agents. We also demonstrated the utility of G5-Gd in sPRE studies to monitor changes in the structures of two proteins as they bind their ligands. These studies highlight the attractive properties of these macromolecular relaxation agents in biomolecular sPRE.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10858-025-00468-9.
Introduction
Paramagnetic ions found widespread use in NMR spectroscopy as a source for pseudocontact shift (PCS), relaxation enhancement (PRE), or residual dipolar coupling (RDC). Due to the relatively large gyromagnetic ratio of electrons relative to protons of ~ 655-fold, the effects of PRE and PCS can be observed to distances upwards of 30 Å and can be sensitive to low population states (Ravera et al. 2022; Koehler and Meiler 2011; Otting 2010). PRE and PCS effects in biomolecular NMR are typically achieved by covalently tethering a low molecular weight compound containing a paramagnetic probe to a reactive site on the biomolecule, such as a cysteine or reactive amine (Giannoulis et al. 2021; Roopnarine and Thomas 2024; Sjodt and Clubb 2017). Alternative attachment sites can be introduced through the use of synthetic amino acids or nucleotides (Faveri et al. 2024; Ledwitch et al. 2024). The two classes of paramagnetic agents often used are nitroxide radicals and paramagnetic metal ions which are chelated by 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) or diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) derivatives (Giovenzana et al. 2017; Anthis and Clore 2015). When chelated metals are used, the choice of ion determines whether the primary effect on the NMR resonance is paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE) or pseudocontact shift (PCS), depending on the anisotropy of the magnetic susceptibility tensor of the metal center (Softley et al. 2020; Muntener et al. 2022; Vogel et al. 2021).
In a comparable manner, paramagnetic probes can be employed as cosolutes to provide a delocalized PRE effect. The magnitude of this solvent PRE (sPRE) is dependent on the average distance between the observable nuclei and the paramagnetic cosolute. Biochemical processes that expose or occlude the reporting nuclei would be detected as an increase or decrease in the solvent PRE, respectively (Lenard et al. 2022; Hocking et al. 2013). sPRE has been used to map the solvent accessible and electro-potential surface of proteins (Iwahara et al. 2023; Yu et al. 2024a, b; Kooshapur et al. 2018a, b; Linser et al. 2009; Otting* 2001; Mulder 2021; Yu et al. 2021a, b), aid in protein structure prediction, validation, and the detection of transient conformational states (Gong et al. 2017, 2018), and perform spectral editing by reducing the intensities of surface exposed resonances (Kellner et al. 2009).
sPRE is extensively applied in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to provide contrast between water in the vasculature and the surrounding tissues. Gd3+ chelated by DTPA was first approved for medical use as a contrast agent in 1988 and continues to be a primary component in MRI imaging. Its effectiveness arises from the large PRE effect of Gd³⁺, due to its seven unpaired electrons, which is rendered biocompatible by DTPA sequestering the ion (Iyad et al. 2023; Do et al. 2020; Kim et al. 2018; Rogosnitzky and Branch 2016). Efforts to produce more effective PRE agents have focused on tethering paramagnetic ions to high molecular weight species to increase relaxivity (the PRE effect per paramagnetic ion) and extend the residence time in the vasculature (Gallo et al. 2020; Lux and Sherry 2018; Wang et al. 2021). Polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer nanoparticles have been explored as drug delivery agents due to a highly controllable synthesis, tunable size, and easily modified spheroidal surfaces (Abedi-Gaballu et al. 2018; Chauhan 2018; Wang et al. 2022; Sarode and Mahajan 2024). Dendrimers of a desired generation are created by repeated nucleophilic substitution and deprotection reactions, starting from a core amine or polyamine (Bober et al. 2022; Fatemi et al. 2020; McMahon and Bulte 2018; Mekuria et al. 2016; Qiao and Shi 2015; Surekha et al. 2021; Longmire et al. 2008; Tomalia et al. 2007; Kobayashi and Brechbiel 2005). PAMAM dendrimers of 6 generations, functionalized with DOTA to chelate Gd³⁺, demonstrated an approximately 3-fold increase in relaxivity compared to both untethered DOTA and 2nd-generation dendrimers in vivo at low magnetic field (Wiener et al. 1994).
Here we are evaluating the effectiveness of using these PAMAM dendrimer contrast probes for biomolecular sPRE at higher fields. The schematic illustration for PAMAM dendrimer is shown in Fig. S1a. Each generation of dendrimer doubles the number of reactive terminal amines (G0 = 4, G1 = 8, G2 = 16, etc.). At the outset we expected that these dendrimers would provide an increase in relaxivity compared to small molecule cosolutes and that the DOTA-functionalized surface would avoid inducing any specific protein-dendrimer interactions. The sPRE performance of the fifth-generation PAMAM dendrimers (G5-Gd) on ubiquitin (Ub) were evaluated under variable dendrimer concentration, temperature, and pH. Additionally, secondary structure elements in urea-denatured Ub, which have previously been detected by sPRE (Kooshapur et al. 2018a, b), were probed with G5-Gd. Furthermore, the apo to holo transition of odorant-binding protein 44a (OBP44a) from fruit fly and the glutamine-binding protein (GlnBP) from Escherichia coli were detected with sPRE measurements using G5-Gd.
Methods
Preparation of lanthanide containing dendrimer
The G5-Gd (G5-GdBnDOTA conjugate) was prepared according to literature methods (Opina et al. 2015) as outlined in Scheme 1. Briefly, the gadolinium complex was prepared by mixing the equimolar amounts of the gadolinium chloride and the ligand (p-NCS-Bn-DOTA) in deionized water. The pH of the reaction was maintained at 5.5 with 1 M NaOH. Upon observation of no pH change, the pH of the reaction was adjusted to 7.4–7.6. The solution was filtered and lyophilized. The complex (128 eq) was added to the G5 dendrimer solution (10 mg/mL, 100 mM HEPES, pH 8.6). The reaction was stirred for 24 h at 40 C. The conjugate was purified using Amicon-Ultra centrifugal filter unit (30 kDa cutoff) with deionized water (5 times). The conjugate was collected from the unit and lyophilized. The number of complexed gadolinium per dendrimer was calculated based on the CHN elemental analysis and gadolinium Inductive Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) results. Briefly, elemental analysis found for the G5 dendrimer conjugate is C 38.1% and Gd 13.7% or 38.40 total carbon atoms per gadolinium atom. The gadolinium complex formula C24H30N5O8SGd is equivalent 14.40 carbon atoms of dendrimer per gadolinium complex. The dendrimer formula C1264H2532N506O252 gives a ratio of 1264/14.4 or approximately 88 Gd chelates per dendrimer.
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of G5-GdBnDOTA conjugate
NMR samples
D2O was added to all NMR samples to 5% v/v (Hocking et al. 2013). 15N-labeled Ub was prepared as previously described (Strickland et al. 2017) and exchanged into 50 mM sodium phosphate pH 5.6. For other pH values 50 mM sodium phosphate buffers were prepared at the desired pH and samples were buffer exchanged using an Amicon filter with a 3 kDa cutoff. For experiments with denatured Ub samples were buffer exchanged into 8 M urea, 10 mM glycine pH 2.5. NMR samples of native and urea-denatured Ub were prepared at 400 µM.
15N-labeled OBP44a was prepared as described previously (He et al. 2023a, b). The apo form of OBP44a was purified using reverse phase HPLC as the final step to ensure no residual fatty acid or lipid was bound to the protein during the expression and purification. The holo-form of OBP44a was created by adding 8(Z)-eicosenoic acid (8(Z)-C20:1) fatty acid at a 1.1:1 ratio to the protein sample. 400 µM NMR samples were prepared in 20 mM postassium phosphate pH 6.6. Wild type (Hocking et al. 2013)15N-labeled GlnBP was expressed and purified following a protocol described in Bermejo et al. (Bermejo et al. 2009) Since the wild-type protein does not contain any cysteine, reducing agent was left out of the purification. To obtain ligand free protein the sample was extensively dialyzed against 6 M Urea and refolded by dialysis against 20 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.5. L-glutamine was added to 1.1 equivalents to generate the holo-form. NMR samples were prepared at 500 µM.
G5-Gd was prepared by hydrating the lyophilized powder to a final Gd concentration of 10 mM or 50 mM. Gadobutrol (Gadovist ®, Bayer, Berlin, Germany) was used to create sPRE to which the G5-Gd data can be compared to. Gadobutrol was prepared as 10 mM or 50 mM solutions by diluting the 1 M gadobutrol stock solution, which contains calcobutrol sodium and trometamol, with water and was added into the NMR sample without further modification of the stock solution.
NMR experiments
The sPRE was calculated by taking the difference in the (Ravera et al. 2022)1H R2 relaxation rate of the protein sample with and without the G5-Gd or Gadobutrol. PRE rates were measured for backbone amide protons using a two-time-point (Hocking et al. 2013)15N-HSQC-based interleaved experiment (Iwahara et al. 2007). Errors in the PRE are propagated from the estimated noise in the diamagnetic and paramagnetic spectra. Measurements were performed on a Bruker Avance 600-MHz spectrometer equipped with a cryo-probe and Z-pulsed field gradient. Spectra were processed with NMRPipe (Delaglio et al. 1995) and analyzed with CCPNMR V354. Ub PRE was measured with 0.57 µM G5-Gd (50 µM Gd) at 298 K unless otherwise specified, OBP44a PRE with 11 µM G5-Gd (1mM Gd) at 298 K, and GlnBP PRE with 23 µM G5-Gd (2mM Gd) at 310 K.
Results
The per-residue PRE for Ub with G5-Gd is illustrated in Fig. 1a with three concentrations of the PRE agent. The amide relaxivity profile is comparable to previously reported sPRE data for Ub with DTPA-Gd³⁺ (Yu et al. 2024a, b) or proxyl nitroxides (Yu et al. 2021a, b). The largest PRE with G5-Gd occurs at T66, followed by residues proceeding the Ub hydrophobic patch residues of L8, I44, and V70. The residues with an elevated PRE are mapped on the structure of Ub in Supplementary Fig. S1b. The relaxivity, as measured by an increase in R2, was linear with G5-Gd concentration, as expected (Fig. S1c). To evaluate the impact of temperature on relaxivity, experiments were conducted at 286 K, 298 K, and 310 K, and Fig. 1b demonstrates the inverse relationship of the G5-Gd PRE and temperature for most residues. In addition, the effect of pH was tested by varying values from pH 5.6 to 6.6 and 7.6 and these data are plotted in Fig. 1c. Similar to the temperature dependence, substantial increases in the PRE at the higher pH are localized to residues which exhibit a large PRE at pH 5.6.
Fig. 1.
1HN transverse sPRE rates of ubiquitin backbone amides by fifth-generation PAMAM dendrimer (G5-Gd). A) )1HN Γ2 data for G5-Gd at Gd3+ concentrations of 50 µM (orange), 125 µM (purple), and 200 µM (cyan). Hydrophobic patch residues are indicated by an asterisk. B) )1HN Γ2 data at 286 K (blue), 298 K (black), and 310 K (red). C) )1HN Γ2 data at pH 5.6 (black), pH 6.6 (light orange), and pH 7.6 (green)
To assess the per-ion gain in R2 relaxivity of G5-Gd vs. conventional PRE agents, the sPRE of Ub was compared between 150 µM of Gd3+ in G5-Gd (corresponding to a dendrimer concentration of 1.70 µM) to 1500 µM of Gd3+ in gadobutrol, a monomeric DOTA-like chelator, a 10-fold increase in concentration. The overlay of this data presented in Fig. 2a shows that G5-Gd induces a roughly 10-fold larger per-ion PRE overall, though for residues more protected from PRE, in α-helices for example, the effect is less pronounced. Interestingly, under our test conditions gadobutrol induces a pronounced PRE in the two loops between the α-helix and β-strand 3 and between β-strand 4 and the 310-helix (Fig. S1b). Elevated PRE in these two loops has also been observed when DTPA-Gd3+ is used as the sPRE cosolute (Kooshapur et al. 2018a, b).
Fig. 2.
1HN transverse sPRE rates of ubiquitin backbone amides under native and denaturing conditions with fifth-generation PAMAM dendrimer (G5-Gd) and gadobutrol. Hydrophobic patch residues are indicated by an asterisk. The concentration of Gd3+ is indicated for both compounds. A) )1HN Γ2 data for native Ub with G5-Gd (grey) and gadobutrol (pink). B) )1HN Γ2 data for urea-denatured Ub with G5-Gd (black) and gadobutrol (blue). Correlation analyses for the PRE from experiments with G5-Gd and gadobutrol for native Ub (C) and denatured Ub (D). The linear fits are represented with a dashed red line and the correlation coefficents are 0.48 for native Ub and 0.64 for denatured Ub
Fine structural details, such as residual secondary structure in denatured proteins, can be gleaned from sPRE measurements and have been previously detected in urea-denatured Ub using a DTPA paramagnetic agent (Kooshapur et al. 2018a, b). To investigate the impact of the size and accessibility of the sPRE agent on detection of residual structural elements, the experiment was repeated using gadobutrol and G5-Gd and the results are shown in Fig. 2b. The PRE profile obtained from gadobutrol closely resembles the one observed with DTPA and shows a reduced PRE for residues near secondary structure elements within the folded protein. The PRE profile recorded with G5-Gd demonstrates a similar trend but shows larger values for the 10 residues at the C-terminus. This elevated PRE is not associated with chemical shift perturbations, which likely rules out a specific binding interaction. The relaxivity of G5-Gd was about six times greater than gadobutrol in these experiments. The correlation plots between sPRE obtained using gadubutrol and G5-Gd for native and denatured ubiquitin are shown in Fig. 2c & d, respectively. Some large PRE values for gadubutrol in native ubiquitin are not observed in G5-Gd (Fig. 2c), perhaps due to some non-specific interaction of the small gadubutrol to ubiquitin.
The effectiveness of G5-Gd as a sPRE agent for detecting global alterations in protein structure was evaluated through the investigation of ligand-induced conformational changes in two model systems. OBP44a is a lipid chaperone protein from Drosophila melanogaster that binds to long chain fatty acids (He et al. 2023a, b). A recent report indicated that the C-terminus undergoes a transition from a random coil to ⍺-helical secondary structure upon binding to these ligands, and this change probably assists with capping the binding pocket (Cotten et al. 2024; Wang et al. 2020). The transition of OBP44a from apo to holo with 8(Z)-C20:1 was evaluated by sPRE with G5-Gd, and the data are overlayed in Fig. 3. Note that the data were collected in the presence of only 11 µM of Gd-containing dendrimer (1mM Gd ions). When comparing the two datasets two regions show notable differences in PRE profiles. Residues 120–124 near the C-terminus exhibit a reduced PRE in the bound form, likely due to the C-terminus folding into the more compact α-helical structure. In contrast, the stretch of residues from 74 to 99 shows a larger PRE in the bound state compared to the apo form, with residues 74–81 having an especially pronounced increase in PRE. These latter residues were shown to be perturbed in crystal structures of OBP22, a homologous protein, when bound to various ligands (Wang et al. 2020), but the role of these residues in ligand binding has not been elucidated.
Fig. 3.
1HN transverse sPRE rates Γ2 of odorant-binding protein (OBP44a) with 11 µM G5-Gd (1mM Gd) in the apo (black) and holo (green) form with 8(Z)-eicosenoic acid. Top panel: Overlay of the two datasets with regions that have consistently larger PRE for either the free or bound states shaded with the respective colors. Bottom panel: Structure of OBP22a bound to arachidonic acid (PDB: 6NBN) which is homologous to OBP44a bound to a fatty acid. Key residues are highlighted onto the structure: residues in black have larger PRE in the apo form while residues in green exhibit larger PRE in the holo form. Arachidonic acid is colored cyan
GlnBP is an essential component for nutrient uptake in Gram-negative bacteria that is highly specific for binding L-glutamine. As a member of the periplasmic binding protein (PBP) family GlnBP consists of two globular domains connected by two polypeptide linker segments that can adopt an “open” conformation, where the interdomain region is solvent and solute accessible, and a “closed” conformation where the two domains converge on the ligand (Bermejo et al. 2010; Davidson et al. 2008). The transition from the open to closed conformation upon binding L-glutamine was examined by sPRE with G5-Gd and the data are overlayed in Fig. 4. These data were obtained with 23µM of Gd-containing dendrimer (2mM Gd ions). Residues 11–14, 49–52, and 138–141 have elevated PRE values in the open state; these residues are located on the solvent-facing side of the binding pocket which becomes occluded upon L-glutamine binding. In contrast, residues within the range of 174–182 and the 13 C-terminal residues are situated on the opposite side of the linker peptides and are partially solvent accessible in the open configuration. After the globular domains rigidify around the L-glutamine ligand these residues become locked in a solvent-exposed conformation (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
1HN transverse sPRE rates Γ2 of glutamine binding protein (GlnBP) with 23 µM G5-Gd (2mM Gd) in the apo (filled circles) and holo (open squares) forms. Top two panels: Overlay of the two datasets with regions that have a substantially larger PRE for either the free or bound states shaded blue or red, respectively. Bottom panel: Structures of GlnBP in the apo (PDB: 1GGG) and holo (PDB: 1WDN) forms, positioned left and right, respectively. Key residues are highlighted on each structure: residues in blue have larger PRE in the apo form while residues in red exhibit larger PRE in the holo form. L-glutamine is colored beige
Discussion and conclusions
sPRE studies typically utilize high concentrations of either nitroxide radicals or lanthanide ions protected by a moiety that limits specific interactions with biomolecules. In the context of MRI, large complexes which are functionalized with these same molecules have been shown to induce a larger relaxivity relative to the monomeric species (Tang et al. 2013). PAMAM dendrimers have been extensively cited as ideal scaffolds for building such compounds due to the straightforward synthesis of high molecular weight derivatives and ease of modifying the surfaces (Venditto et al. 2005). The increase in the observed relaxivity was attributed to the increased molecular weight, thus correlation time of the contrast agent. Whether this increase in relaxivity will hold true at very high magnetic fields was not clear.
Although these compounds remain experimental in the clinic, based on our preliminary results PAMAM dendrimers could be attractive agents for sPRE in NMR spectroscopy. Using Ub as an example, we have demonstrated that these dendrimers functionalized with DOTA-Gd3+ groups enhance the transverse PRE effect upwards of 10-fold per Gd3+ ion compared to a small molecule probe. Unsurprisingly, the residues with large PRE values are located in highly dynamic regions adjacent to the Ub hydrophobic patch (Lange et al. 2008) except, anomalously, for T12 and T66. The PRE with G5-Gd was shown to be inversely correlated with temperature, likely due to Curie spin relaxation and favorable water exchange kinetics at lower temperature. This behavior has previously been demonstrated in transverse relaxation enhancement induced by PRE compounds with a coordinated water molecule (Caravan et al. 2001; Strickland et al. 2016), as is the case with DOTA chelates. Residues with significant PRE at pH 5.5 also exhibit increased relaxation at higher pH, with some of these residues showing fast solvent exchange rates at pH 5.8 (Brand et al. 2007; Jahr et al. 2011) and 7.0.(Jurt & Zerbe 2012). In contrast, the amides of T12 and T66 are not adjacent to residues with a fast solvent exchange rate yet exhibit a large sPRE. This suggests that the observed PRE enhancement is additionally influenced by water exchange kinetics at the dendrimer rather than solely backbone amide exchange (Tóth et al. 1996).
sPRE experiments typically utilize small and hydrophobic paramagnetic agents which, by nature of their compact geometry, can sample the majority of the solvent-exposed protein surface. By moving to the larger spheroid structure of G5-Gd some of these cavities could become occluded to the paramagnetic species and exhibit a reduced PRE. Despite the large size of G5-Gd, the PRE profile of denatured Ub overall resembled those obtained with DTPA or gadobutrol; however, an elevated PRE near the C-terminus suggested possible non-specific interactions with some of these residues. In experiments with native Ub a cluster of residues exhibited substantial PRE with gadobutrol and DTPA but not with G5-Gd (Fig. S1b.) and could reflect either the larger size of G5-Gd or weak interactions facilitated by the smaller size of these probes. sPRE experiments using the ligand-binding proteins OBP44a and GlnBP demonstrated that G5-Gd is capable of detecting subtle tertiary structural changes induced by ligand binding.
Together these data show that PAMAM dendrimers can be functionalized into potent sPRE agents for NMR spectroscopy which yield large increases in relaxivity relative to commonly used PRE probes. Similar to the observed increase of relaxivity in low field MRI, we also saw a notable increase at very high magnetic field. In this work the dendrimers were capped with Gd3+ chelated by benzyl-DOTA tag which is known to be a relatively inert chemical probe. While this compound induced similar relaxation profiles to gadobutrol, a small molecule analogue of the DOTA functional group, there were discrepancies that could be attributed to the difference in size of the particle, affecting non-specific interactions with the analyte, or the water dynamics at the chelating groups. At the lower concentrations required (1–25µM) to achieve a sufficient PRE for analysis any non-specific interactions with these dendrimers would be minimized, and dendrimer-based PRE could be particularly useful for detecting exceptionally weak interactions or for increasing the local concentration of other functional groups.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Duck-Yeon Lee of the Biochemistry Core Facility at the NHLBI for expertise and advice regarding LC-MS. This work was supported by the Intramural Research Programs of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the NIH to NT.
Author contributions
W.P., J.M.G., and N.T. came up with the concepts.A.O and O.V. synthesized the G5-Gd-dendrimers.W.P. prepared the draft of the manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Abedi-Gaballu F et al (2018) PAMAM dendrimers as efficient drug and gene delivery nanosystems for cancer therapy. Appl Mater Today 12:177–190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anthis NJ, Clore GM (2015) Visualizing transient dark States by NMR spectroscopy. Q Rev Biophys 48:35–116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bermejo GA, Strub MP, Ho C, Tjandra N (2009) Determination of the solution-bound conformation of an amino acid binding protein by NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement: use of a single flexible paramagnetic probe with improved Estimation of its sampling space. J Am Chem Soc 131:9532–9537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bermejo GA, Strub MP, Ho C, Tjandra N (2010) Ligand-free open-closed transitions of periplasmic binding proteins: the case of glutamine-binding protein. Biochemistry 49:1893–1902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bober Z, Bartusik-Aebisher D, Aebisher D (2022) Application of dendrimers in anticancer diagnostics and therapy. Molecules 27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Brand T et al (2007) Residue-specific NH exchange rates studied by NMR diffusion experiments. J Magn Reson 187:97–104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caravan P, Greenfield MT, Bulte JW (2001) Molecular factors that determine curie spin relaxation in dysprosium complexes. Magn Reson Med 46:917–922 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chauhan AS (2018) Dendrimers for drug delivery. Molecules 23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Cotten ML et al (2024) NMR chemical shift assignment of drosophila odorant binding protein 44a in complex with 8(Z)-eicosenoic acid. Biomol NMR Assign 18:129–134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davidson AL, Dassa E, Orelle C, Chen J (2008) Structure, function, and evolution of bacterial ATP-binding cassette systems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 72:317–364 table of contents [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Faveri C, Mattheisen JM, Sakmar TP, Coin I (2024) Noncanonical amino acid tools and their application to membrane protein studies. Chem Rev 124:12498–12550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delaglio F et al (1995) NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR 6:277–293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Do C et al (2020) Gadolinium-Based contrast agent use, their safety, and practice evolution. Kidney360 1:561–568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fatemi SM, Fatemi SJ, Abbasi Z (2020) PAMAM dendrimer-based macromolecules and their potential applications: recent advances in theoretical studies. Polym Bull 77:6671–6691 [Google Scholar]
- Gallo E et al (2020) Systematic overview of soft materials as a novel frontier for MRI contrast agents. RSC Adv 10:27064–27080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giannoulis A, Ben-Ishay Y, Goldfarb D (2021) Characteristics of Gd(III) spin labels for the study of protein conformations. Methods Enzymol 651:235–290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giovenzana GB, Lattuada L, Negri R (2017) Recent advances in bifunctional paramagnetic chelates for MRI. Isr J Chem 57:825–832 [Google Scholar]
- Gong Z, Gu XH, Guo DC, Wang J, Tang C (2017) Protein structural ensembles visualized by solvent paramagnetic relaxation enhancement. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 56:1002–1006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gong Z, Schwieters CD, Tang C (2018) Theory and practice of using solvent paramagnetic relaxation enhancement to characterize protein conformational dynamics. Methods 148:48–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He Y, Cotten ML, Yin J, Yuan Q, Tjandra N (2023a) Expression and purification of drosophila OBP44a with the aids of LC-MS and NMR. Protein Expr Purif 212:106354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He Y, Cotten ML, Yin J, Yuan Q, Tjandra N (2023b) Expression and purification of drosophila OBP44a with the aids of LC-MS and NMR. Protein Exp Purif 212:106354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hocking HG, Zangger K, Madl T (2013) Studying the structure and dynamics of biomolecules by using soluble paramagnetic probes. ChemPhysChem 14:3082–3094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iwahara J, Tang C, Marius Clore G (2007) Practical aspects of (1)H transverse paramagnetic relaxation enhancement measurements on macromolecules. J Magn Reson 184:185–195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iwahara J, Pettitt BM, Yu B (2023) Direct measurements of biomolecular electrostatics through experiments. Curr Opin Struct Biol 82:102680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iyad N, Alkhatib MSA, S.G., Hjouj M (2023) Gadolinium contrast agents- challenges and opportunities of a multidisciplinary approach: literature review. Eur J Radiol Open 11:100503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jahr N, Fiedler E, Günther R, Hofmann H-J, Berger S (2011) NH exchange in point mutants of human ubiquitin. Int J Biol Macromol 49:154–160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jurt S, Zerbe O (2012) A study on the influence of fast amide exchange on the accuracy of (15)N relaxation rate constants. J Biomol NMR 54:389–400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kellner R et al (2009) SEMPRE: spectral editing mediated by paramagnetic relaxation enhancement. J Am Chem Soc 131:18016–18017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim HK, Lee GH, Chang Y (2018) Gadolinium as an MRI contrast agent. Future Med Chem 10:639–661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kobayashi H, Brechbiel MW (2005) Nano-sized MRI contrast agents with dendrimer cores. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 57:2271–2286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koehler J, Meiler J (2011) Expanding the utility of NMR restraints with paramagnetic compounds: background and practical aspects. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 59:360–389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kooshapur H, Schwieters CD, Tjandra N (2018a) Conformational ensemble of disordered proteins probed by solvent paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (sPRE). Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 57:13519–13522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kooshapur H, Schwieters CD, Tjandra N (2018b) Sep 12 Conformational ensemble of disordered proteins probed by solvent Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement (sPRE). Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) 57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Lange OF et al (2008) Recognition dynamics up to microseconds revealed from an RDC-derived ubiquitin ensemble in solution. Science 320:1471–1475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ledwitch K, Kunze G, Okwei E, Sala D, Meiler J (2024) Non-canonical amino acids for site-directed spin labeling of membrane proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 89:102936 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lenard AJ, Mulder FAA, Madl T (2022) Solvent paramagnetic relaxation enhancement as a versatile method for studying structure and dynamics of biomolecular systems. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 132–133:113–139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Linser R, Fink U, Reif B (2009) Probing surface accessibility of proteins using paramagnetic relaxation in solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 131:13703–13708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Longmire M, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H (2008) Dendrimer-based contrast agents for molecular imaging. Curr Top Med Chem 8:1180–1186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lux J, Sherry AD (2018) Advances in gadolinium-based MRI contrast agent designs for monitoring biological processes in vivo. Curr Opin Chem Biol 45:121–130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McMahon MT, Bulte JWM (2018) Two decades of dendrimers as versatile MRI agents: a Tale with and without metals. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 10:e1496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mekuria SL, Debele TA, Tsai HC (2016) PAMAM dendrimer based targeted nano-carrier for bio-imaging and therapeutic agents. RSC Adv 6:63761–63772 [Google Scholar]
- Mulder FAA (2021) NMR spectroscopy charges into protein surface electrostatics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Muntener T, Joss D, Haussinger D, Hiller S (2022) Pseudocontact shifts in biomolecular NMR spectroscopy. Chem Rev 122:9422–9467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Opina AC et al (2015) Preparation and long-term biodistribution studies of a PAMAM dendrimer G5-Gd-BnDOTA conjugate for lymphatic imaging. Nanomed (Lond) 10:1423–1437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Otting G (2010) Protein NMR using paramagnetic ions. Annu Rev Biophys 39:387–405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Otting* G (2001) Identification of protein surfaces by NMR measurements with a paramagnetic Gd(III) chelate. (December 22 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Qiao Z, Shi XY (2015) Dendrimer-based molecular imaging contrast agents. Prog Polym Sci 44:1–27 [Google Scholar]
- Ravera E, Gigli L, Fiorucci L, Luchinat C, Parigi G (2022) The evolution of paramagnetic NMR as a tool in structural biology. Phys Chem Chem Phys 24:17397–17416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rogosnitzky M, Branch S (2016) Gadolinium-based contrast agent toxicity: a review of known and proposed mechanisms. Biometals 29:365–376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roopnarine O, Thomas DD (2024) Structural dynamics of protein interactions using Site-Directed spin labeling of cysteines to measure distances and rotational dynamics with EPR spectroscopy. Appl Magn Reson 55:79–100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sarode RJ, Mahajan HS (2024) Dendrimers for drug delivery: an overview of its classes, synthesis, and applications. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 98:105896 [Google Scholar]
- Sjodt M, Clubb RT (2017) Nitroxide labeling of proteins and the determination of paramagnetic relaxation derived distance restraints for NMR studies. Bio Protoc 7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Skinner SP et al (2016) CcpNmr analysisassign: a flexible platform for integrated NMR analysis. J Biomol NMR 66:111–124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Softley CA, Bostock MJ, Popowicz GM, Sattler M (2020) Paramagnetic NMR in drug discovery. J Biomol NMR 74:287–309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strickland M et al (2016) Characterizing the magnetic susceptibility tensor of lanthanide-containing polymethylated-DOTA complexes. J Biomol NMR 66:125–139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strickland M et al (2017) Tsg101 chaperone function revealed by HIV-1 assembly inhibitors. Nat Commun 8:1391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Surekha B et al (2021) PAMAM dendrimer as a talented multifunctional biomimetic nanocarrier for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 204:111837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang JB, Sheng YQ, Hu HJ, Shen YQ (2013) Macromolecular MRI contrast agents: structures, properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci 38:462–502 [Google Scholar]
- Tomalia DA, Reyna LA, Svenson S (2007) Dendrimers as multi-purpose nanodevices for oncology drug delivery and diagnostic imaging. Biochem Soc Trans 35:61–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tóth É, Pubanz D, Vauthey S, Helm L, Merbach A (1996) The role of water exchange in attaining maximum relaxivities for dendrimeric MRI contrast agents. Chem---Eur J 2:1607–1615 [Google Scholar]
- Venditto VJ, Regino CA, Brechbiel MW (2005) PAMAM dendrimer based macromolecules as improved contrast agents. Mol Pharm 2:302–311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vogel R, Müntener T, Häussinger D (2021) Intrinsic anisotropy parameters of a series of lanthanoid complexes deliver new insights into the structure-magnetism relationship. Chem 7:3144–3156 [Google Scholar]
- Wang J, Murphy EJ, Nix JC, Jones DNM (2020) Aedes aegypti odorant binding protein 22 selectively binds fatty acids through a conformational change in its C-terminal tail. Sci Rep 10:3300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang S, Liu Q, Li L, Urban MW (2021) Recent advances in Stimuli-Responsive commodity polymers. Macromol Rapid Commun 42:e2100054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J, Li B, Qiu L, Qiao X, Yang H (2022) Dendrimer-based drug delivery systems: history, challenges, and latest developments. J Biol Eng 16:18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiener EC et al (1994) Dendrimer-based metal chelates: a new class of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 31:1–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu B, Pletka CC, Pettitt BM, Iwahara J (2021a) De Novo determination of near-surface electrostatic potentials by NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Yu B et al (2021b) De novo determination of near-surface electrostatic potentials by NMR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118-06-22) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Yu B, Bolik-Coulon N, Rangadurai AK, Kay LE, Iwahara J (2024a) Gadolinium-Based NMR spin relaxation measurements of Near-Surface electrostatic potentials of biomolecules. J Am Chem Soc 146:20788–20801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu B, Bolik-Coulon N, Rangadurai AK, Kay LE, Iwahara J (2024b) Gadolinium-Based NMR Spin Relaxation Measurements of Near-Surface Electrostatic Potentials of Biomolecules. Journal of the American Chemical Society 146(July 19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.





