Skip to main content
Cancer Medicine logoLink to Cancer Medicine
. 2025 Aug 26;14(17):e71151. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71151

GATA3 as a Prognostic Marker in Early‐Stage Classical Mycosis Fungoides: Association With Disease Progression and Survival Outcomes

Pengfei Wen 1, Fan Li 1, Yao Xie 1, Wei Chen 1, Tingting Wang 1, Xiaoxue Zhuo 1, Lin Wang 1,
PMCID: PMC12378640  PMID: 40856420

ABSTRACT

Background and Objective

Classical mycosis fungoides (CMF), the most common form of primary cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma, shows marked heterogeneity in disease progression and prognosis, while reliable molecular prognostic markers remain scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of GATA‐binding protein 3 (GATA3) expression in early‐stage CMF.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 106 patients with early‐stage CMF diagnosed at West China Hospital, Sichuan University, between 2009 and 2021. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to assess GATA3 expression in dermal tumor cells. Associations with progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined using Cox regression models adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate predictive performance.

Results

High GATA3 expression (≥ 60%) was detected in 92.5% of cases. Elevated GATA3 levels were significantly associated with reduced PFS and OS. IPTW‐adjusted Cox regression confirmed high GATA3 expression as an independent adverse prognostic factor. ROC curve analysis demonstrated strong predictive performance for CMF progression (AUC = 0.867), with an optimal cutoff of 57.5% (sensitivity 73.7%, specificity 94.3%). For clinical applicability, a 60% threshold was adopted.

Conclusion

High GATA3 expression is an independent adverse prognostic biomarker in early‐stage CMF. Incorporating GATA3 into risk stratification models may improve prognostic accuracy and guide personalized treatment strategies.

Keywords: biomarker, classical mycosis fungoides, gata3, prognosis, survival, t‐cell lymphoma


Abbreviations

CI

Confidence Interval

CMF

Classical Mycosis Fungoides

CR

Complete Remission

DAB

Diaminobenzidine

EOS

Eosinophil

HR

Hazard Ratio

IHC

Immunohistochemical

LDH

Lactate Dehydrogenase

MF

Mycosis Fungoides

NB‐UVB

Narrow‐Band Ultraviolet B

OS

Overall Survival

PD

Partial Remission

PFS

Progression‐Free Survival

SD

Stable Disease

1. Introduction

Classical mycosis fungoides (CMF) is the most common type of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma, characterized by a chronic and slow‐progressing disease course [1, 2]. Due to its varied clinicopathological manifestations, it is often misdiagnosed as eczema or psoriasis in the early stages [3]. Therefore, early diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment and improving patient prognosis [4]. Although early‐stage CMF symptoms are relatively mild, some patients may progress to more severe stages, at which point treatment becomes more challenging, and survival rates significantly decrease [5]. Currently, the treatment of CMF includes skin‐directed or systemic therapy [6, 7], while severe cases may require chemotherapy or radiotherapy [8, 9, 10]. Understanding the pathological mechanisms underlying CMF progression is crucial for developing novel therapeutic strategies and improving patient outcomes.

The clinical manifestations and disease progression of CMF show high variability among patients, making accurate prediction of disease trajectory a major clinical challenge [11, 12]. Early identification and progression prediction are vital for clinicians to develop individualized treatment strategies [13] and improve patients' quality of life and life expectancy. While various biomarkers are available for assessing other types of tumors, specific biomarkers for CMF remain limited, restricting the accuracy of disease management and prognosis assessment.

GATA‐Binding Protein 3 (GATA3) is a transcription factor primarily expressed in T‐cells, which is crucial in regulating T‐cell development and function [14]. In dermatopathology, GATA3 expression is associated with various inflammatory and neoplastic conditions [15, 16], and its role in modulating immune responses and cell differentiation has been extensively studied. Recent research indicates that GATA3 may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of cutaneous T‐cell lymphomas, suggesting its potential as a prognostic biomarker for CMF [17, 18]. Therefore, exploring the expression pattern of GATA3 in CMF and its relationship with disease progression is of considerable clinical value for understanding its pathobiological significance.

Although the role of GATA3 is well established in many cancers, its specific function in the progression of early‐stage CMF remains unclear [19]. Previous studies have primarily focused on the association between GATA3 and advanced or more severe forms of cutaneous lymphomas [20], with limited research addressing early‐stage CMF [21]. This study adopts a single‐center retrospective design, employing detailed immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis to systematically evaluate GATA3 expression levels in a large cohort of early‐stage CMF patients and analyze its relationship with disease prognosis. The novelty of this research lies in identifying a potential biomarker for early diagnosis and prediction of disease progression in CMF.

This study investigates the expression pattern of GATA3 in early‐stage CMF and evaluates its association with disease progression and clinical outcomes. Through retrospective analysis of IHC data and long‐term follow‐up in 111 patients, we assessed the prognostic value of GATA3 expression. The findings may inform risk stratification strategies and provide a basis for future studies on the pathogenic and therapeutic implications of GATA3 in CMF.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Selection

This retrospective study included early‐stage CMF patients from the 2009–2021 database of West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Eligible cases were diagnosed at stage IA, IB, or IIA and had complete clinical and imaging data. Diagnoses were confirmed based on the 2018 WHO‐EORTC classification and the fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumors [22, 23], and further validated by a panel of dermatology and pathology experts at West China Hospital. Only patients with comprehensive clinical, pathological, and follow‐up data were included. Of the 111 early‐stage CMF patients who met these criteria, 106 underwent GATA3 IHC analysis and were included in subsequent analyses (Figure 1). Patients with incomplete data or lost to follow‐up were excluded. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Approval No. WH‐20221653).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Flowchart of clinical patient inclusion and exclusion.

2.2. Collection of Clinicopathological and Follow‐Up Data

Clinical data were collected from initial diagnosis, including age at onset, gender, lesion morphology, lesion distribution, clinical and TNMB stage, and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Histopathological features from the initial diagnostic biopsy, such as epidermotropism and Pautrier microabscesses, were also recorded. Due to the significantly different prognoses of folliculotropic MF (FMF) and large cell transformed MF (LCT‐MF) compared to CMF [24, 25, 26], these histological subtypes were deliberately excluded to avoid confounding the prognostic analysis. All surviving patients were followed for at least 10 months. Follow‐up data included treatment modality, treatment response, and survival status. Disease progression was defined as progression from early‐stage disease (IA to IIA) to advanced‐stage disease (stage IIB or higher) or death due to MF, as previously described [27, 28]. GATA3 expression was assessed based on the percentage of GATA3‐positive tumor cells in the dermis and categorized into high‐expression (≥ 60%) and low‐expression (< 60%) groups. Progression‐free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from diagnosis to either disease progression or the end of follow‐up, measured in months, with progression determined by changes in the T stage (progression = 1, no progression = 0). Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from diagnosis to death or end of follow‐up, using death as the event variable (1 = death, 0 = alive). Covariates included in the multivariate analysis were age, gender, B symptoms, LDH level, TNMB stage, treatment modality, head and neck involvement, and lymphadenopathy.

2.3. GATA3 Expression Analysis

GATA3 IHC staining was performed using a monoclonal antibody (MAB‐0695) provided by MXB Biotechnologies. Tumor samples were routinely formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded, and sectioned at a thickness of 4 μm. Standard IHC procedures were followed: after deparaffinization and antigen retrieval, sections were incubated with the GATA3 antibody solution overnight at 4°C; followed by applying a secondary antibody and DAB chromogen for visualization. Stained slides were examined under a microscope, and certified pathologists evaluated GATA3 expression in tumor cells.

Assessment of GATA3 expression adhered strictly to the 2018 WHO‐EORTC classification of cutaneous lymphomas and the fifth edition of the WHO classification of hematopoietic tumors. Only dermal cell populations with morphological features consistent with neoplastic T‐cells, such as marked nuclear atypia, band‐like infiltration, epidermotropism, or the presence of Pautrier microabscesses, were included in the evaluation. Two senior dermatopathologists independently reviewed all slides blinded, excluding cytoplasmic staining and non‐neoplastic elements such as macrophages. GATA3 positivity was defined as nuclear staining in at least 1% of tumor cells, with no restriction on staining intensity. The results were reported as the percentage of GATA3‐positive tumor cells and used for statistical analysis to assess associations with clinicopathological features.

2.4. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis

To evaluate the predictive value of GATA3 expression for CMF progression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to assess diagnostic performance, with AUC values ranging from 0.5 to 1.0, where higher values indicate stronger predictive ability. The optimal cutoff value was determined by identifying the maximum Youden index (sensitivity + specificity—1). Sensitivity and specificity at this threshold were recorded to assess the accuracy of GATA3 as a potential biomarker for predicting CMF progression.

2.5. Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Analysis

To further assess whether GATA3 expression serves as an independent prognostic factor for disease progression and survival in patients with early‐stage CMF, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to control for potential confounders, including gender, B symptoms, and treatment modality. A weighted Cox proportional hazards regression model was constructed using the stabilized IPTW sample. Propensity scores were first estimated using a logistic regression model with GATA3 expression level (high vs. low) as the dependent variable and the selected confounders as covariates. Stabilized IPTW weights were subsequently derived from these scores to create a balanced pseudo‐population. Weighted Cox models were then used to evaluate the effect of high GATA3 expression on progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Model outcomes were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and corresponding p‐values. To enhance model robustness and avoid overfitting, given the limited number of outcome events, no stepwise variable selection was performed; instead, variables with established biological relevance were retained throughout the analysis.

2.6. Forest Plot Visualization

A forest plot based on the IPTW‐weighted Cox regression analysis was generated to visualize the independent prognostic impact of GATA3 expression on PFS and OS. The plot focused on the primary variable (high GATA3 expression) and was created using the ggplot2 package. HRs, 95% CIs, and p‐values were annotated on the plot. Additional model performance metrics, including AIC, C‐index, and global log‐rank p‐value, were also presented to aid interpretation.

2.7. Kaplan–Meier Survival Analysis

A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was conducted to further validate the impact of high GATA3 expression on PFS and OS, with log‐rank tests used for between‐group comparisons. Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to visually illustrate survival differences between the high‐expression (≥ 60%) and low‐expression (< 60%) groups, with 95% CIs calculated.

2.8. Data Processing and Software

All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.2.0). Cox proportional hazards regression was conducted using the survival package, while Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log‐rank tests were generated with the survminer package. Forest plots and other visualizations were created using ggplot2. ROC curve analysis was performed using the pROC package. To control for confounding and improve model stability, IPTW based on propensity scores was applied, with stabilized weights derived from a logistic regression model. All statistical tests were two‐sided; a p‐value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Statistical Analysis of Early‐Stage CMF Patient Characteristics

A total of 111 patients with early‐stage CMF were included, comprising 72 males (64.9%) and 39 females (35.1%), with a mean age of onset of 40.6 ± 16.9 years (range, 9–86). Patients aged ≤ 60 years accounted for 83.8%. The median interval from symptom onset to diagnosis was 60 months (range, 1–624). Head and neck involvement was observed in 35 patients (31.5%); 6 patients (5.4%) had erosion or ulceration, 10 (9.0%) presented with B symptoms, and 12 (10.8%) had superficial lymphadenopathy. Among 80 patients with available LDH data, 28 (35.0%) had elevated serum LDH. T1 and T2 stages were observed in 52 (46.8%) and 59 (53.2%) patients. Clinical staging showed 52 (46.8%) patients in stage IA, 47 (42.3%) in stage IB, and 12 (10.8%) in stage IIA. Epidermotropism was detected in 105 patients (94.6%) and Pautrier microabscesses in 37 (33.3%). Dermal GATA3 expression levels between 40% and 59% were observed in 52 patients (49.1%). The median follow‐up duration was 101 months (range, 10–341), with a mortality rate of 5.4%. Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 97 months (range, 2–151), and median overall survival (OS) was 101 months (range, 10–341) (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Patient characteristics at initial diagnosis and follow‐up data of 111 cases of early‐stage CMF.

Characteristics n (%)
Sex
Male 72 (64.9)
Female 39 (35.1)
Age of onset (years) Average 40.6 ± 16.9 (range 9–86)
> 60 18 (16.2)
≤ 60 93 (83.8)
Onset to diagnosis time (months) Median 60 (range 1–624)
Involvement of the head and neck 35 (31.5)
Erosion or/and ulcer 6 (5.4)
B symptoms 10 (9.0)
Superficial lymphadenopathy 12 (10.8)
Elevated serum LDH level 28/80 (35.0)
T stage
T1 52 (46.8)
T2 59 (53.2)
Clinical stage
IA 52 (46.8)
IB 47 (42.3)
IIA 12 (10.8)
Epidermophism 105 (94.6)
Pautrier microabscess 37 (33.3)
GATA3 expression in dermis (%)
≥ 60 19/106 (17.9)
40–59 52/106 (49.1)
20–39 27/106 (25.5)
< 20 8/106 (7.5)
Duration of follow‐up/death (months) Median 101 (range 10–341)
Died 6 (5.4)
PFS (months) Median 97 (range 2–151)
OS (months) Median 101 (range 10–341)

Abbreviations: CMF, classical mycosis fungoides; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PFS, progression‐free survival; OS, overall survival.

3.2. Correlation Between High GATA3 Expression and Disease Progression in Early‐Stage CMF

Due to limited residual tissue, GATA3 immunostaining was successfully performed on 106 out of 111 tumor samples. Eight patients (7.5%) were completely GATA3‐negative (Figure 2A), and none of them experienced disease progression. Among these, 98 cases (92.5%) showed GATA3 positivity with a median expression rate of 40% (range: 20%–80%). The distribution of GATA3 expression was as follows: 20%–39% in 27 patients (25.5%, Figure 2B), 40%–59% in 52 patients (49.1%, Figure 2C), and ≥ 60% in 19 patients (17.9%, Figure 2D). Distribution by clinical stage showed that 62.5% (30/48) had expression rates of 40%–59% in stage IA. In stage IB, 30.4% (14/46), 37.0% (17/46), and 26.1% (12/46) had expression rates of 20%–39%, 40%–59%, and ≥ 60%, respectively. Among 12 patients with stage IIA, 10 showed expression rates > 40%, with 5 cases ≥ 60%. Disease progression occurred in 19 of 106 patients (17.9%), 14 of whom (73.7%) had GATA3 expression ≥ 60%. Among the 87 patients without progression, only 5 (5.7%) had expression ≥ 60%, while 60.9% (53/87) had expression between 40% and 59%. A significant association was observed between GATA3 expression ≥ 60% and disease progression (p < 0.001, φ = 0.693; Table 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Analysis of GATA3 staining in tumor cells. Representative IHC images show nuclear GATA3 expression at different levels: (A) < 20% positive cells (n = 8, 7.5%); (B) 20%–40% (n = 27%, 25.5%); (C) 40%–60% (n = 52, 49.1%); (D) ≥ 60% (n = 19, 17.9%). Brown nuclear staining indicates GATA3‐positive cells, evaluated only in dermal lymphocytes with morphological features consistent with neoplastic T‐cells. Scale bar = 50 μm.

TABLE 2.

The correlation between different cutoff values of GATA3 expression rate in dermis and disease progression.

< 20% ≥ 20% p φ < 40% ≥ 40% p φ < 60% ≥ 60% p φ
progressive 0 19 0.371 0.134 1 18 0.005* 0.276 5 14 < 0.001* 0.679
Non‐progressive 8 79 34 53 82 5

Note: φ is the correlation coefficient, ranging from 0 to 1. The larger the φ, the stronger the correlation between the two factors.

*

Indicate statistically significant.

3.3. Long‐Term Follow‐Up and Treatment Analysis of MF Patients

A total of 111 early‐stage CMF patients were followed until October 2021 or death, with a median follow‐up of 101 months. Common treatment regimens included subcutaneous interferon‐α1b (IFN‐α1b) and narrow‐band ultraviolet B (NB‐UVB) therapy. IFN‐α1b monotherapy was administered in 12 patients (10.8%); NB‐UVB in 18 patients (16.2%); and a combination of both in 37 patients (33.3%). Additional treatments, used alone or in combination, included localized radiotherapy (8.1%), oral acitretin (6.3%), subcutaneous thymosin (5.4%), oral thalidomide (4.5%), topical corticosteroids (4.5%), retinoids (3.6%), and chlorambucil (1.8%). Seven patients (6.3%) experienced spontaneous remission and received no specific treatment (Table 3). Two patients (1.8%) underwent combination chemotherapy; one progressed, and one died. Six patients (5.4%) died during follow‐up, including four from MF (3.6%), one from pneumonia (0.9%), and one from sepsis (0.9%). Disease progression occurred in 19 patients (17.1%). Post‐treatment outcomes included stable disease (SD) in 35 patients (31.5%), partial remission (PR) in 41 patients (36.9%), and complete remission (CR) in 16 patients (14.4%) (Table 4).

TABLE 3.

Overview of treatment methods and patient usage rate.

IFN NB‐UVB NB‐UVB + IFN Monotherapy or combination therapy Untreated
Rad Aci Thy Tha Cor Tre Chl
Case 12 18 37 9 7 6 5 5 4 2 7
Ratio 10.8% 16.2% 33.3% 8.1% 6.3% 5.4% 4.5% 4.5% 3.6% 1.8% 6.3%

Abbreviations: IFN, IFN‐α1b; NB‐UVB, narrow‐band ultraviolet B; Rad, radiotherapy; Aci, acitretin; Thy, thymosin; Tha, thalidomide; Cor, corticosteroids; Tre, Tretinoin; Chl, Chlormethine.

TABLE 4.

Patient clinical outcome after treatment.

Clinical outcome Patients Percentage
Disease progression (PD) 19 17.1%
Stable disease (SD) 35 31.5%
Partial response (PR) 41 36.9%
Complete response (CR) 16 14.4%

3.4. Correlation Analysis of GATA3 Expression and Clinical Characteristics With PFS and OS in MF Patients

The median PFS and OS for patients were 97 months (2–151 months) and 101 months (range: 10–341 months), respectively. The 5‐year and 10‐year PFS rates were 84.8% (78/92) and 64.7% (33/51), while the 5‐year and 10‐year OS rates were 96.6% (84/87) and 87.8% (36/41). A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for survival analysis to evaluate potential prognostic factors affecting PFS and OS in MF patients, as shown in Table 5. Univariate analysis revealed that head and neck involvement (p = 0.001), erosion/ulceration (p < 0.001), B symptoms (p < 0.001), superficial lymphadenopathy (p = 0.003), elevated serum LDH levels (p = 0.002), and GATA3 expression ≥ 60% in the dermis (p < 0.001) were associated with poorer PFS.

TABLE 5.

Prognostic analyses for early‐stage CMF patients.

Variable at diagnosis Univariate analysis for PFS Multivariate analysis for PFS Univariate analysis for OS Multivariate analysis for OS
HR 95% CI p HR 95% CI p HR 95% CI p HR 95% CI p
Sex (male vs. female) 0.637 0.259–1.568 0.326 46.267 0.051–42243.181 0.27
Age (> 60 vs. ≤ 60) 0.593 0.137–2.568 0.485 1.261 0.141–11.284 0.836
Head and neck involvement 4.716 1.848–12.034 0.001* 1.088 0.348–3.403 0.885 192.633 0.094–395034.009 0.176
Formation of erosion/ulcer 11.628 4.124–32.787 < 0.001* 3.315 0.83–13.247 0.09 34.397 5.786–204.496 < 0.001* 10.815 0.824–141.986 0.07
B symptoms 6.185 2.343–16.328 < 0.001* 0.573 0.155–2.12 0.404 8.782 1.582–48.76 0.013* 0.228 0.012–4.415 0.328
Superficial lymphadenopathy 4.034 1.618–10.054 0.003* 7.667 2.258–26.032 0.001* 7.996 1.329–48.11 0.023* 7.395 0.438–124.884 0.165
Elevated serum LDH level 4.534 1.721–11.945 0.002* 1.16 0.368–3.66 0.8 7.422 0.828–66.526 0.073 5.914 0.224–156.292 0.287
GATA3 expression ≥ 60% in dermis 20.773 7.41–58.235 < 0.001* 27.741 7.392–104.11 < 0.001* 24.338 2.748–215.558 0.004* 26.879 1.055–684.935 0.046*

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CMF, classical mycosis fungoides; HR, hazard ratio; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression‐free survival.

* indicate statistically significant.

In the multivariate analysis, superficial lymphadenopathy (HR = 7.667, 95% CI: 2.258–26.032, p = 0.001) and a GATA3 expression rate of ≥ 60% (HR = 27.741, 95% CI: 7.392–104.11, p < 0.001) were identified as independent prognostic factors for PFS. Similarly, in the univariate analysis, erosion/ulceration (p < 0.001), B symptoms (p = 0.013), superficial lymphadenopathy (p = 0.023), and GATA3 expression ≥ 60% (p = 0.004) were associated with poorer OS. However, in the multivariate model, only GATA3 expression ≥ 60% remained an independent OS factor (HR = 26.879, 95% CI: 1.055–684.935, p = 0.046).

Previous studies have shown that GATA3 expression above 50% is associated with Th2 immune polarization in cutaneous T‐cell lymphomas [29], and the 12‐month overall survival rate of patients was approximately 60% [30]. In conclusion, GATA3 expression demonstrated significant prognostic value in MF, particularly for PFS and OS. A high expression level (≥ 60%) was identified as an independent prognostic factor, indicating its potential clinical utility in MF risk stratification.

3.5. Evaluation of GATA3's Predictive Ability for CMF Progression

A ROC curve was generated to evaluate the predictive performance of GATA3 for CMF progression, yielding an AUC of 0.867 (Figure 3). The optimal cutoff value determined by the maximum Youden index was 57.5%, with a sensitivity of 73.7% and specificity of 94.3%. At a threshold of ≥ 60%, GATA3 maintained the same sensitivity (73.7%) and specificity (94.3%), supporting its utility as a clinically relevant cutoff. Accordingly, a threshold of 60% was adopted to define high GATA3 expression for subsequent analyses.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

ROC curve for GATA3 in predicting CMF progression. The ROC curve was used to evaluate the predictive capability of GATA3 expression levels for CMF progression, and the AUC was calculated.

3.6. Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Analysis

To assess the independent prognostic value of GATA3 expression, IPTW—adjusted Cox regression models were applied. High GATA3 expression (≥ 60%) was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR = 15.48, 95% CI: 3.79–63.19, p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 9.31, 95% CI: 1.31–66.01, p = 0.026). Gender, B symptoms, and treatment modality did not significantly affect outcomes (p > 0.05; Tables 6, 7). IPTW‐weighted forest plots (Figure 4A,B) illustrate the prognostic impact of GATA3 expression on PFS and OS.

TABLE 6.

Cox Regression Analysis for Progression‐Free Survival (PFS).

Variable HR (Hazard Ratio) 95% CI p
GATA3 Expression 15.48 3.79–63.19 < 0.001
Gender 0.92 0.74–1.14 0.423
B Symptoms 1.04 0.77–1.42 0.842
Treatment 0.88 0.63–1.22 0.489

TABLE 7.

Cox Regression Analysis for Overall Survival (OS).

Variable HR (Hazard Ratio) 95% CI p
GATA3 Expression 9.30 1.30–66.00 0.026
Gender 1.12 0.82–1.55 0.476
B Symptoms 1.06 0.66–1.71 0.802
Treatment 0.72 0.65–1.11 0.396

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Forest plots of IPTW‐weighted cox regression models for PFS and OS. Forest plots from IPTW‐weighted Cox regression models showing the effect of high GATA3 expression (≥ 60%) on progression‐free survival (A) and overall survival (B) in patients with early‐stage CMF. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals are displayed to illustrate the independent prognostic impact.

3.7. Impact of GATA3 on the Survival of CMF Patients

Among 106 early‐stage CMF patients with GATA3 staining, patients were stratified into a high‐expression group (≥ 60%, n = 19) and a low‐expression group (< 60%, n = 87). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. No significant differences were observed in gender, age, superficial lymphadenopathy, epidermal hyperplasia, epidermotropism, or presence of Pautrier microabscesses (p > 0.05). However, the high‐expression group showed significantly higher T stage (p = 0.0008) and clinical stage (p = 0.0046) and was more frequently associated with head and neck involvement (p = 0.0024), erosion or ulceration (p < 0.0001), B symptoms (p = 0.0055), elevated peripheral eosinophil count (p = 0.0096), and elevated serum LDH levels (p = 0.0141) (Table 8). Survival analysis revealed shorter PFS and OS in the high expression group. Log‐rank tests showed significant differences between groups in both PFS and OS (p < 0.0001 for both; Figure 5).

TABLE 8.

The impact of GATA3 overexpression on clinical features and prognosis.

Chi‐square p
Gender 2.454e‐005 0.9960
Age 0.582 (t) 0.5617
Enlargement of superficial lymph nodes 1.094 0.2955
Collagen fibrosis of the papillary layer 0.023 0.8801
Epidermal hyperplasia 1.143 0.2850
Epidermotrophism 1.389 0.2386
Pautrier microabscess 1.855 0.1732
TNMB staging at initial diagnosis 11.290 0.0008
Clinical staging at initial diagnosis 8.026 0.0046
Head face involved 9.183 0.0024
Depth of infiltration 27.490 < 0.0001
B symptom 7.722 0.0055
Erosion/Ulceration 22.623 < 0.0001
Peripheral blood EOS level 6.707 0.0096
Serum LDH level 6.020 0.0141

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Kaplan–Meier survival curve analysis for different GATA3 expression groups. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curves for PFS in CMF patients. (B) Kaplan–Meier survival curves for OS in CMF patients.

4. Discussion

MF is the most common type of primary cutaneous lymphoma and has long been a focus of research in cutaneous oncology, particularly regarding disease progression and prognostic prediction. GATA3, a key transcription factor in T‐cell differentiation, has been extensively studied across various tumors, demonstrating its potential as a biomarker [14, 31, 32]. However, few studies have explored the relationship between GATA3 expression and disease prognosis in early‐stage CMF [1, 20]. This study aims to fill that gap.

Our findings indicate that high GATA3 expression in early‐stage CMF patients is closely associated with disease progression and poorer prognosis. It aligns with previous studies linking GATA3 expression to poor prognosis in other cancers, such as breast and bladder [33]. Additionally, the negative correlation observed in our study between GATA3 expression levels and both PFS and OS further supports its role as a marker of poor prognosis. These findings provide new insights into the biological behavior of CMF, suggesting that GATA3 may influence disease severity and treatment response by affecting tumor cell behavior.

Unlike previous studies that focused on pathological or clinical features, this study utilized IHC to quantitatively analyze GATA3 expression, providing a more precise method for detecting this biomarker. By retrospectively analyzing clinical data from 111 early‐stage CMF patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2021, this study emphasized the importance of long‐term follow‐up data in evaluating the relationship between biomarkers and disease prognosis. This approach offers direct evidence of the impact of GATA3 expression on prognosis rather than relying on indirect biochemical analyses or short‐term clinical observations.

Given the strong correlation between GATA3 expression and prognosis in early‐stage CMF, its detection could become a valuable clinical tool for assessing disease progression and guiding treatment decisions. For instance, patients with high GATA3 expression may require more aggressive therapeutic strategies or closer monitoring of disease progression. Additionally, GATA3 detection could aid in patient selection for clinical trials, facilitating the development of personalized treatment approaches.

Although this study establishes the correlation between GATA3 expression and prognosis in CMF, the specific mechanisms by which GATA3 influences CMF still need to be determined. Existing literature suggests that GATA3 is critical in regulating immune responses and cell differentiation [34]. We hypothesize that its high expression may exacerbate disease progression by affecting the local immune microenvironment or promoting tumor cell invasiveness. Future research could further explore the role of GATA3 in the pathogenesis of CMF, providing a scientific basis for developing targeted therapies against GATA3.

This study is the first to systematically evaluate the role of GATA3 in CMF progression and provides large‐scale patient data to support its clinical utility as a prognostic predictor. Through Cox regression analysis and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, we established a clear association between high GATA3 expression and both disease progression and reduced survival in CMF patients. These findings offer important clinical insights for early‐stage CMF diagnosis, staging, and personalized treatment decision‐making. Furthermore, the prognostic value of GATA3 may contribute to risk stratification and the development of novel targeted therapeutic strategies for CMF.

This study has several limitations. First, as a retrospective analysis, standardized pathological documentation was lacking in some cases, particularly regarding lesion morphology (patch vs. plaque) and ISCL‐recommended histological features such as dermal fibrosis and epidermal hyperplasia. It limited the incorporation of lesion type into prognostic analysis. Second, although TNMB staging was recorded systematically, the small number of patients with stage IIA may have reduced the statistical power for assessing the prognostic impact of superficial adenopathy in this subgroup. In addition, GATA3 expression was assessed by conventional IHC without co‐staining for CD4/CD8, which may have introduced minor interference from reactive T‐cells. Finally, due to the rarity of early‐stage CMF, the overall sample size was limited, potentially affecting the stability of some statistical estimates. The functional role of GATA3 in the tumor immune microenvironment also remains unclear.

Future studies may expand in three major directions. Mechanistically, multiplex immunofluorescence, spatial transcriptomics, and single‐cell multi‐omics could map GATA3 expression across tumor and immune cell populations and explore its role in pathways such as Wnt/β‐catenin or JAK–STAT. Methodologically, large prospective cohorts are needed to build and validate risk prediction models incorporating GATA3. Clinically, further evaluation of GATA3 expression to guide individualized CMF treatment—particularly its potential synergy with IFN‐α1b and NB‐UVB—may help improve long‐term outcomes in high‐risk patients.

5. Conclusion

This study identified the expression characteristics of GATA3 in early‐stage CMF and confirmed that high GATA3 expression (≥ 60%) is strongly associated with disease progression and poor prognosis. Multivariable Cox regression analysis established high GATA3 expression as an independent risk factor for both PFS and OS in CMF patients. Furthermore, ROC curve analysis demonstrated that GATA3 exhibits moderate‐to‐good diagnostic performance in predicting CMF progression. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis further supported these findings, revealing significantly shorter survival times in the high GATA3 expression group. Collectively, these results suggest that GATA3 may play a crucial role in CMF progression and could serve as a potential prognostic biomarker.

Author Contributions

Pengfei Wen: conceptualization; investigation; writing – original draft. Fan Li: conceptualization; validation; writing – original draft. Yao Xie: data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; software; visualization; writing – original draft. Wei Chen: data curation; formal analysis; methodology; software. Tingting Wang: data curation; formal analysis; methodology; visualization. Xiaoxue Zhuo: methodology; validation; writing – review and editing. Lin Wang: conceptualization; funding acquisition; project administration; resources; supervision; writing – review and editing.

Ethics Statement

This retrospective study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (Approval No.: WH‐20221653). As this study involved the analysis of archival patient material and clinical data collected between 2009 and 2021, a waiver of written informed consent was granted by the Ethics Committee due to the retrospective nature of the study and the use of de‐identified data. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors have nothing to report.

Wen P., Li F., Xie Y., et al., “ GATA3 as a Prognostic Marker in Early‐Stage Classical Mycosis Fungoides: Association With Disease Progression and Survival Outcomes,” Cancer Medicine 14, no. 17 (2025): e71151, 10.1002/cam4.71151.

Funding: This work was supported by Sichuan Medical and Health Care Promotion Institute (KY2022SJ0117).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Pileri A., Guglielmo A., Grandi V., et al., The Microenvironment's Role in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: From Progression to Therapeutic Implications, vol. 10 (MDPI AG, 2021), 2780, 10.3390/cells10102780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Saleh J. S., Subtil A., and Hristov A. C., “Primary Cutaneous T‐Cell Lymphoma: A Review of the Most Common Entities With Focus on Recent Updates,” Human Pathology 140 (2023): 75–100, 10.1016/j.humpath.2023.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Diakomopoulos A., Dalamaga M., and Papadavid E., “Understanding the Enigmatic Association Between Mycosis Fungoides and Psoriasis: Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature,” in Understanding the Enigmatic Association Between Mycosis Fungoides and Psoriasis: Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature, vol. 12 (Metabolism Open. Elsevier BV, 2021), 100148, 10.1016/j.metop.2021.100148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. García‐Díaz N., Piris M. Á., Ortiz‐Romero P. L., and Vaqué J. P., “Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: An Integrative Review of the Pathophysiology, Molecular Drivers, and Targeted Therapy,” Cancers. MDPI AG 13 (2021): 1931, 10.3390/cancers13081931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kempf W. and Mitteldorf C., Cutaneous T‐Cell Lymphomas—An Update 2021, vol. 39 (Hematological Oncology. Wiley, 2021), 46–51, 10.1002/hon.2850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lovgren M. L. and Scarisbrick J. J., “Update on Skin Directed Therapies in Mycosis Fungoides,” Chinese Clinical Oncology. AME Publishing Company 8 (2019): 7, 10.21037/cco.2018.11.03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Olsen E. A., Hodak E., Anderson T., et al., “Guidelines for Phototherapy of Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: A Consensus Statement of the United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Elsevier BV 74 (2016): 27–58, 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Latzka J., Assaf C., Bagot M., et al., “EORTC Consensus Recommendations for the Treatment of Mycosis Fungoides/Sézary Syndrome – Update 2023,” European Journal of Cancer. Elsevier BV 195 (2023): 113343, 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kamijo H. and Miyagaki T., “Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: Updates and Review of Current Therapy,” Current Treatment Options in Oncology. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 22 (2021), 10, 10.1007/s11864-020-00809-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Miyashiro D. and Sanches J. A., “Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, Staging, and Therapeutic Management,” Frontiers in Oncology. Frontiers Media SA 13 (2023): 1141108, 10.3389/fonc.2023.1141108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Quaglino P., Fava P., Pileri A., et al., “Phenotypical Markers, Molecular Mutations, and Immune Microenvironment as Targets for New Treatments in Patients With Mycosis Fungoides and/or Sézary Syndrome,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology. Elsevier BV 141 (2021): 484–495, 10.1016/j.jid.2020.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Dobos G., Lazaridou I., and de Masson A., Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: Microenvironment and Cancer Progression, vol. 15 (MDPI AG, 2023), 746, 10.3390/cancers15030746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Litvinov I. V., Netchiporouk E., Cordeiro B., et al., The Use of Transcriptional Profiling to Improve Personalized Diagnosis and Management of Cutaneous T‐Cell Lymphoma (CTCL), vol. 21 (Clinical Cancer Research. American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2015), 2820–2829, 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-3322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ahmed M. M., Hegazy A. A., Embaby A., et al., “Tox Outperforms foxp3, cd4 and gata3 in Histopathological Diagnosis of Early Mycosis Fungoides,” Turkish Journal of Pathology. Federation of Turkish Pathology Societies 39 (2022): 15–22, 10.5146/tjpath.2022.01578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Durgin J. S., Weiner D. M., Wysocka M., and Rook A. H., “The Immunopathogenesis and Immunotherapy of Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma: Pathways and Targets for Immune Restoration and Tumor Eradication,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Elsevier BV 84 (2021): 587–595, 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.12.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wang D. and Beck L. A., “Immunologic Targets in Atopic Dermatitis and Emerging Therapies: An Update,” American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. Springer Science and Business Media LLC 17 (2016): 425–443, 10.1007/s40257-016-0205-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Collins K., Gu J., Aung P. P., et al., Is Immunohistochemical Expression of GATA3 Helpful in the Differential Diagnosis of Transformed Mycosis Fungoides and Primary Cutaneous CD30‐Positive T Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders?, vol. 479 (Virchows Archiv. Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021), 377–383, 10.1007/s00428-021-03056-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hsi A. C., Lee S. J., Rosman I. S., et al., “Expression of Helper T Cell Master Regulators in Inflammatory Dermatoses and Primary Cutaneous T‐Cell Lymphomas: Diagnostic Implications,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Elsevier BV 72 (2015): 159–167, 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Atwa H. A. and Abdelrahman D. I., “The Value of Immunohistochemical Expression of TOX, ICOS, and GATA‐3 in the Diagnosis of Mycosis Fungoides,” in Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology, vol. 31 (Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2023), 163–171, 10.1097/pai.0000000000001110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lai P., Liu F., Liu X., Sun J., and Wang Y., “Differential Molecular Programs of Cutaneous Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma and CD30‐Positive Transformed Mycosis Fungoides,” Frontiers in Immunology 14 (2023): 1270365, 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1270365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wong H. K., Mishra A., Hake T., and Porcu P., “Evolving Insights in the Pathogenesis and Therapy of Cutaneous T‐Cell Lymphoma (Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome),” British Journal of Haematology. Wiley 155 (2011): 150–166, 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08852.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Willemze R., Cerroni L., Kempf W., et al., “The 2018 Update of the WHO‐EORTC Classification for Primary Cutaneous Lymphomas,” Blood 133 (2019): 1703–1714, 10.1182/blood-2018-11-881268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Alaggio R., Amador C., Anagnostopoulos I., et al., “The 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms,” in The 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms, vol. 36 (Leukemia. Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022), 1720–1748, 10.1038/s41375-022-01620-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. O'Donnell M., Zaya R., Correia E., et al., “Disease Characteristics, Prognosis, and Response to Therapy in Patients With Large‐Cell Transformed Mycosis Fungoides: A Single‐Center Retrospective Study,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Elsevier BV 86 (2022): 1285–1292, 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. van Santen S., Roach R. E. J., van Doorn R., et al., Clinical Staging and Prognostic Factors in Folliculotropic Mycosis Fungoides, vol. 152 (JAMA Dermatology. American Medical Association (AMA), 2016), 992, 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.1597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Muniesa C., Estrach T., Pujol R. M., et al., “Folliculotropic Mycosis Fungoides: Clinicopathological Features and Outcome in a Series of 20 Cases,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Elsevier BV 62 (2010): 418–426, 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Lebowitz E., Geller S., Flores E., et al., “Survival, Disease Progression and Prognostic Factors in Elderly Patients With Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: A Retrospective Analysis of 174 Patients,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 33 (2018): 108–114, 10.1111/jdv.15236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Agar N. S., Wedgeworth E., Crichton S., et al., “Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Mycosis Fungoides/Sézary Syndrome: Validation of the Revised International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Staging Proposal,” Journal of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 28 (2010): 4730–4739, 10.1200/jco.2009.27.7665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Wang T., Lu Y., Polk A., et al., “T‐Cell Receptor Signaling Activates an ITK/NF‐κB/GATA‐3 Axis in T‐Cell Lymphomas Facilitating Resistance to Chemotherapy,” Clinical Cancer Research 23 (2017): 2506–2515, 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Boonstra P. S., Polk A., Brown N., et al., “A Single Center Phase II Study of Ixazomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Cutaneous or Peripheral T‐Cell Lymphomas,” American Journal of Hematology. Wiley 92 (2017): 1287–1294, 10.1002/ajh.24895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wong H. K., “Novel Biomarkers, Dysregulated Epigenetics, and Therapy in Cutaneous T‐Cell Lymphoma,” Discovery Medicine 16, no. 87 (2013): 71–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Akilov O. E., What Does the Future Hold for Biomarkers of Response to Extracorporeal Photopheresis for Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome?, vol. 12 (MDPI AG, 2023), 2321, 10.3390/cells12182321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Di Gioacchino M., Della Valle L., Allegra A., Pioggia G., and Gangemi S., “AllergoOncology: Role of Immune Cells and Immune Proteins,” Clinical and Translational Allergy 12 (2022): e12133, 10.1002/clt2.12133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Hara N. and Sawada Y., “Epigenetics of Cutaneous T‐Cell Lymphomas,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences. MDPI AG 23 (2022): 3538, 10.3390/ijms23073538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Cancer Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES