Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
letter
. 2025 May 19;38(6):1707–1710. doi: 10.1007/s40620-025-02305-6

Contributing factors and clinical usefulness of spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio by sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: a cross-sectional study

Kojiro Nagai 1,, Keisuke Morita 1, Ken Matsuo 1, Satoshi Tanaka 1
PMCID: PMC12378716  PMID: 40388066

Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) is expressed on the luminal side of the proximal tubule and reabsorbs the glucose filtered by the glomeruli [1]. Clinical trials have demonstrated renal and cardiovascular protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors [24]. However, evidence is lacking for these effects in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages G4-5 [5, 6].

Multiple mechanisms underlie the protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, primarily through the inhibition of renal glucose reabsorption. Assessing urinary glucose excretion is clinically important as it could help predict the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors.

Pharmacological studies on SGLT2 inhibitors have established that renal impairment and diabetic status affect urinary glucose excretion. Yet, other influential factors remain unexplored, and there are scant urinary glucose excretion data from actual patients [7].

Spot urine tests can conveniently estimate the 24 h excretion rates of substances. It is essential to determine whether the spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio can predict 24 h urinary glucose excretion.

This cross-sectional study included 284 outpatients with CKD who visited the Department of Nephrology at Shizuoka General Hospital between April, 2022 to December, 2022. Fifty-three patients were excluded due to a lack of laboratory data, and an additional five were excluded for noncompliance with treatment that was discovered by interview survey. Ultimately, 226 patients (mean ± SD: 66.4 ± 13.7 years; 43 females; 168 diabetics) were enrolled. Blood and urine samples were collected at any time for biochemical analysis. Creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcre) was calculated using the formula: eGFRcre (mL/min/1.73 m2) = 194 × serum creatinine−1.094 × age−0.287 × 0.739 (if female) [8]. This group included 100 (44.2%) and 98 (43.4%) patients with CKD stages G4-5 and stage G3, respectively. The mean eGFRcre was 37.4 ± 22.3 mL/min/1.73m2. Ninety-three (41.2%) and fifty-eight (25.7%) patients suffered from diabetic kidney disease and hypertensive nephrosclerosis, respectively. The main prescriptions were 10 mg of dapagliflozin (n = 69 (30.5%)) and empagliflozin (51 (22.6%)) once daily. Among the 226 patients, 39 completed a 24 h urine collection.

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS for Windows (version 13.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The factors related to spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio were initially assessed using single regression analysis. Variables considered included age, serum albumin level, eGFRcre, blood glucose, HbA1c, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, fractional excretion of urea nitrogen, and creatinine-corrected urinary tubular injury markers such as α1-microglobulin (MG)/Cre (creatinine corrected), β2MG/Cre, NAG/Cre, NGAL/Cre, and L-FABP/Cre. Multiple regression analysis was performed using variables that showed P of less than 0.1 in single regression analysis. Correlation was determined by Pearson’s correlation coefficient test. Low urinary glucose excretion was tentatively defined as a urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio less than 30 g/gCr, based on a predicted value from our study’s single regression analysis, where the spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio for patients with an eGFRcre of 30 ml/min/1.73m2 was 25.9 g/gCr. Statistical significance was defined as P less than 0.05.

Regression analysis was performed in all patients. Age, serum albumin level, eGFRcre, blood glucose, HbA1c, potassium, chloride, calcium, fractional excretion of urea nitrogen, β2MG/Cre and α1MG/Cre were identified as possible factors. Correlations are shown in Fig. 1a. The independent factors selected for spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio were eGFRcre, blood glucose, HbA1c and fractional excretion of urea nitrogen (Fig. 1b). Adjusted R2 was 0.618.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a Correlations between possible factors related to the spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio in all patients (n = 226). Alb albumin. eGF, eGFRcre creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate. Glu glucose. HbA HbA1c. Pota potassium. Chlo chloride. Calc calcium. FE, FEUN fractional excretion of urea nitrogen. β2M, β2MG/Cre β2-microglobulin (creatinine corrected). α1M, α1MG/Cre α1-microglobulin (creatinine corrected). UG, UG/Cre spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio. b Significant independent factors for spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio in all patients (n = 226). eGFRcre creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate. FEUN fractional excretion of urea nitrogen. β2MG/Cre β2-microglobulin (creatinine corrected). α1MG/Cre α1-microglobulin (creatinine corrected). SE standard error. c Scatter plots of 24 h urine and spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio (n = 39). d Scatter plots of 24 h urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio and estimated GFR (n = 39). eGFRcre: creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate. e Scatter plots of spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio and estimated GFR (n = 226). eGFRcre creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate

To investigate the pure effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on urinary glucose excretion, we analyzed 137 patients whose dipstick test for glucose before initiating SGLT2 inhibitor therapy was negative at least twice consecutively. Other sub-analyses were conducted on 69 patients taking 10 mg of dapagliflozin, and on 100 patients with CKD stages G4-5. The independent determinants of all sub-analyses were the same as those in all patients.

We compared spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio with 24 h urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio. Among the 39 patients who provided 24 h urine samples, only 23 (59.0%) met the 70% accuracy threshold in predicting 24 h urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio. However, among 22 patients with a spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio less than 30 g/gCr, 19 had a 24 h urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio less than 30 g/gCr, resulting in a positive predictive value of 86.4% (Fig. 1c).

The 24‐hour urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio varied from 5.7 to 42.5 in patients with CKD stages G4-5 and from 16.1 to 87.1 in patients with CKD stages G1-3 (Fig. 1d). Similarly, the spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio ranged widely (Fig. 1e).

In this study, we provide data on urinary glucose excretion from patients with advanced CKD treated with SGLT2 inhibitors, which were found to vary widely. Potential independent factors influencing spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio in those patients included blood glucose, kidney function, and volume status, but not tubulointerstitial injury markers. Spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio may be useful in identifying patients with low urinary glucose excretion due to SGLT2 inhibitors.

Previous research has shown that urinary glucose excretion by SGLT2 inhibitors is contingent upon the amount of glucose filtered into the tubule. Despite variations in renal function, there was a consistent inhibition (30–50%) of glucose reabsorption [7]. Our findings align with these studies. The relationship between urinary glucose excretion and fractional excretion of urea nitrogen is consistent with reports of a low incidence of volume depletion-related adverse events in clinical trials of SGLT2 inhibitors [24]. Surrogate markers of proximal tubule damage have no impact on urinary glucose excretion, suggesting that glucose reabsorption occurs irrespective of renal disease.

Spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio may be a useful predictor for identifying patients with low urinary glucose excretion. Notably, many patients with low urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio were observed even among those with CKD stages G1-3 (Fig. 1d, e). Spot urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio could serve as a screening test to estimate the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors and potentially reduce polypharmacy, and to avoid SGLT2 inhibitor-related side effects [9].

Further studies on the outcomes and complications in patients taking SGLT2 inhibitors in relation to urinary glucose excretion would allow us to ascertain the clinical role of urinary glucose excretion.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp).

Author contributions

Study conception and design: all authors. Data collection: KMorita, KMatsuo. Data analysis: ST, KN. Writing: KN.

Funding

None.

Data availability

The datasets analyzed are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The author reports no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Shizuoka General Hospital (approval number: SGHIRB#2022030).

Human and animal rights

This manuscript does not include animal experimental data.

Consent to participate

Informed consent to participate was obtained in an opt-out fashion using a poster posted at outpatient department, and the hospital’s website.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Ohgaki R, Wei L, Yamada K, Hara T, Kuriyama C, Okuda S, Ueta K, Shiotani M, Nagamori S, Kanai Y (2016) Interaction of the sodium/Glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitor canagliflozin with SGLT1 and SGLT2. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 358:94–102. 10.1124/jpet.116.232025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Heerspink HJL, Stefánsson BV, Correa-Rotter R, Chertow GM, Greene T, Hou FF, Mann JFE, McMurray JJV, Lindberg M, Rossing P, Sjöström CD, Toto RD, Langkilde AM, Wheeler DC, DAPA-CKD Trial Committees and Investigators (2020) Dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 383:1436–1446. 10.1056/NEJMoa2024816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B, Bompoint S, Heerspink HJL, Charytan DM, Edwards R, Agarwal R, Bakris G, Bull S, Cannon CP, Capuano G, Chu PL, de Zeeuw D, Greene T, Levin A, Pollock C, Wheeler DC, Yavin Y, Zhang H, Zinman B, Meininger G, Brenner BM, Mahaffey KW, CREDENCE Trial Investigators (2019) Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 380:2295–2306. 10.1056/NEJMoa1811744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.The EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group, Herrington WG, Staplin N, Wanner C, Green JB, Hauske SJ, Emberson JR, Preiss D, Judge P, Mayne KJ, Ng SYA, Sammons E, Zhu D, Hill M, Stevens W, Wallendszus K, Brenner S, Cheung AK, Liu ZH, Li J, Hooi LS, Liu W, Kadowaki T, Nangaku M, Levin A, Cherney D, Maggioni AP, Pontremoli R, Deo R, Goto S, Rossello X, Tuttle KR, Steubl D, Petrini M, Massey D, Eilbracht J, Brueckmann M, Landray MJ, Baigent C, Haynes R (2023) Empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 388(117):127. 10.1056/NEJMoa2204233 [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bakris G, Oshima M, Mahaffey KW, Agarwal R, Cannon CP, Capuano G, Charytan DM, de Zeeuw D, Edwards R, Greene T, Heerspink HJL, Levin A, Neal B, Oh R, Pollock C, Rosenthal N, Wheeler DC, Zhang H, Zinman B, Jardine MJ, Perkovic V (2020) Effects of canagliflozin in patients with baseline eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 15:1705–1714. 10.2215/CJN.10140620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chertow GM, Vart P, Jongs N, Toto RD, Gorriz JL, Hou FF, McMurray JJV, Correa-Rotter R, Rossing P, Sjöström CD, Stefánsson BV, Langkilde AM, Wheeler DC, Heerspink HJL, DAPA-CKD Trial Committees and Investigators (2021) Effects of dapagliflozin in stage 4 chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 32:2352–2361. 10.1681/ASN.2021020167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hu S, Lin C, Cai X, Zhu X, Lv F, Nie L, Ji L (2022) The urinary glucose excretion by sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in patients with different levels of renal function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 12:814074. 10.3389/fendo.2021.814074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Horio M, Imai E, Yasuda Y, Watanabe T, Matsuo S (2013) Performance of GFR equations in Japanese subjects. Clin Exp Nephrol 17:352–358. 10.1007/s10157-012-0704-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Naghnaghia S, Nazzal Z, Abu Alya L, Al-Ramahi R, Hamdan Z, Samara E (2023) The association between renal impairment and polypharmacy among older Palestinian patients: a multi-center cross-sectional study. BMC Prim Care 24:50. 10.1186/s12875-023-02005-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of Nephrology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES