Abstract
Little is known about the serologic response elicited by the Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) vaccination (JYNNEOS) against mpox in elderly individuals with or without HIV. In this study, we measured levels of antibody against orthopoxvirus in selected participants (n = 114) with HIV or at risk for HIV acquisition from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study/Women's Interagency HIV Study Combined Cohort Study, who had no prior reported history of mpox. Participants reported MVA-BN vaccination history via questionnaires. The median age was 64 years, 24.6% were female, and 46% were HIV seropositive. Twenty out of 114 participants received at least 1 dose of MVA-BN. We found that MVA-BN induced sustained IgG levels regardless of HIV status, even up to 1 year. Birth before 1973 was correlated with higher IgG. MVA-BN-unvaccinated individuals with HIV had lower IgG than those without HIV. Although limited by small sample size, our study is among the first to assess anti-orthopoxvirus antibodies specifically in a vulnerable, older population and stratified by HIV status.
Keywords: antibody level, HIV, mpox, MVA-BN
Monkeypox virus (MPXV) is an orthopoxvirus that causes mpox, a clinical illness similar to smallpox. In 2022, a global outbreak of mpox was caused by Clade IIb MPXV and disproportionately affected men who reported having sex with men [1]. As of 31 December 2024, a total of 34 490 cases of mpox were reported to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [2]. Even though most cases were mild and self-limited, severe or even fatal cases occurred in people with HIV (PWH) [3]. Routine childhood smallpox vaccination was terminated in 1972 after the disease was eradicated in the United States [4], and few civilians received smallpox vaccination until the 2022 mpox outbreak, when the Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) vaccine (JYNNEOS) was made available through the national stockpile. Although exact correlates of protection following MVA-BN are not well-characterized, there is evidence that MVA-BN protects against mpox [5]. Breakthrough infections after MVA-BN are rare, and in most cases, the symptoms are milder [6, 7].
Few studies have focused on long-term immunogenicity and effectiveness in PWH. Prior efforts found that in the short term (1 month after immunizations), MVA-BN is immunogenic, but HIV infection appears to negatively affect neutralizing antibody response [8]. However, existing data on long-term immune response to MVA-BN raise concerns, as MPXV-IgG levels after either 1 or 2 doses of MVA-BN were reported to decline almost to prevaccination levels 12 months after immunization [9]. In that study, however, most participants were young, living without HIV (only 9% were living with HIV), and otherwise had no previous smallpox vaccination exposure [9]. Moreover, little is known about the association between HIV, previous smallpox vaccination, and long-term vaccine immunogenicity in regard to aging populations. To this end, we leveraged the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS)/Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) Combined Cohort Study (MWCCS), a multicenter prospective cohort study of men and women with HIV or at risk for HIV acquisition [10], to evaluate serologic response to either historic smallpox vaccination or MVA-BN vaccination during the 2022 mpox outbreak.
METHODS
Participants
Participants enrolled in the MWCCS cohort who had self-reported mpox and smallpox vaccination information were included in this study. All participants signed informed consent, and the parent study was approved by each site's Institutional Review Board (IRB). Additional inclusion criteria were
Age ≥18 years and all sexes
Available HIV-related information
Serum samples were obtained at each MWCC scheduled visit and cryopreserved at the central repository at the Johns Hopkins University Data Analysis and Coordination Center. For participants vaccinated with MVA-BN, we analyzed anti-orthopoxvirus IgG levels from available serum samples from prevaccination, <6 months after the first or final dose, and over 6 months after the first or final dose. For participants not vaccinated with MVA-BN during this outbreak, available serum samples from pre-outbreak (before 2022), 6 months within the outbreak (1 June 2022 to 1 December 2022), and over 6 months after the outbreak started (after 1 December 2022) were used.
Anti-orthopoxvirus-Binding IgG Measurement
Anti-orthopoxvirus-binding IgG measurement was reported in our previous studies. Briefly, serum samples were tested for orthopoxvirus IgG at 1:100 dilution using MVA-BN as antigen. We used optical density (OD)–cutoff value (COV) (OD-COV) derived from ELISA to determine anti-orthopoxvirus IgG levels [11, 12]. Results below 0 were censored to 0 and considered seronegative.
Statistical Analysis
Categorical variables were summarized using number and percentage and compared using either χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were summarized using median and interquartile range and compared using nonparametric methods. For 2 independent groups, we used the Wilcoxon rank sum test, and for paired samples (longitudinal measurements), we used the Wilcoxon signed rank test. P values from multiple comparisons were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. For longitudinal repeated measurements, we used the generalized estimating equation (GEE) to estimate variables associated with IgG levels with autoregressive correlation structure (“geepack” package, version 1.3.12). The first dose of MVA-BN was set as day 0 (index date). In longitudinal GEE analysis, time points earlier than 12 months prior to the first MVA-BN vaccination (for vaccinated individuals) or earlier than 1 June 2021 (for unvaccinated individuals) were set to −12 months relative to the index date. Of note, vaccination dose was set as a time-varying variable in the GEE analyses. In the case that a participant received 2 doses of MVA-BN, and the second sampling time point fell between 2 doses (only 2 participants had this case scenario), the number of vaccinations was counted as 1 dose for the first 2 time points and as 2 doses for the third time point. All statistical analyses were performed using R (version 4.3.1).
RESULTS
Of the 114 MWCCS participants included in the study (median age of 64 years; Supplementary Table 1), 75% were male and 89% were born before 1973. Among them, 52 (46%) were HIV seropositive, with an HIV-1 viral suppression rate of 88.5% (HIV-1 viral load <50 copies/mL). Of all participants, 20 received MVA-BN, and among these participants, 15 (75%) received 2 doses. In the analysis including all participants, the MVA-BN-vaccinated group showed higher anti-orthopoxvirus IgG levels at time point 3 (6 months after the first dose of MVA-BN or 6 months beyond the 2022 outbreak, adjusted P < .0001, Figure 1A; Supplementary Table 2) relative to the group that had not received MVA-BN. Since most vaccinated participants received 2 doses of MVA-BN, and the second dose of MVA-BN may explain the persistent increase in the IgG levels at time point 3, we performed a sensitivity analysis including only those whose time point definition remained unchanged based on either the first or final dose of MVA-BN. In addition, only those with all 3 time points available were included (Figure 1B). MVA-BN vaccinations remained associated with higher IgG levels at time point 3 (adjusted P = .0003) and in this subgroup analysis, also at time point 2 (adjusted P = .004, Figure 1B). In a multivariate GEE model including all participants, 2 doses of MVA-BN and birth before 1973 were positively correlated with IgG levels, while HIV seropositivity was negatively correlated with IgG levels (Figure 1C). Longitudinally, the MVA-BN-vaccinated group showed a persistent increase in IgG levels in both whole group analysis (time point 3 vs 1, adjusted P = .013, Figure 1A) and sensitivity analysis (time point 3 vs 1, adjusted P = .004, Figure 1B). In MVA-BN vaccines, the number of vaccine doses received and HIV serostatus were not associated with IgG levels, while birth before 1973 (those who likely had childhood smallpox vaccination) was significantly associated with higher IgG levels (Supplementary Figure 1; Supplementary Table 3). In those who had not received MVA-BN, IgG levels were stably low, with a seropositivity rate at approximately 80% (Figure 1A). HIV seropositivity was negatively associated with IgG levels, while birth before 1973 was again significantly associated with higher IgG levels (Supplementary Figure 2; Supplementary Table 4). No participants reported ever having a positive mpox test result.
Figure 1.
Anti-orthopoxvirus IgG levels in MVA-BN-vaccinated group (MVA-BN) and those without MVA-BN-vaccinated group (none). A, IgG levels in the full cohort, with the first dose MVA-BN as day 0. Details on the time interval between each time point and vaccinations were shown in Supplementary Table 2. B, IgG levels in a subgroup analysis, with the final dose of MVA-BN as day 0. In this subgroup analysis, only those with samples from all 3 time points available, and whose time point definition remained the same using either the first or final dose of MVA-BN as day 0. In (A) and (B), time 1: before MVA-BN vaccination (vaccinated group) or before the 2022 outbreak (unvaccinated groups). Time 2: <6 m of MVA-BN vaccination (vaccinated group) or within 6 m of the 2022 outbreak (designated as 1 June 2022). Time 3: ≥6 m after MVA-BN vaccination (vaccinated group) or over 6 m since the 2022 outbreak. P values between groups were calculated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and P values within groups were calculated using the Wilcoxon singed rank test. Final P values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Nonsignificant P values were not shown. C, Longitudinal IgG levels in the full cohort, with the first dose of MVA-BN as day 0. Multivariate generalized estimating equation (GEE) results were attached in the right panel. Sex was also adjusted for but not listed (P = .5).
DISCUSSION
Our results showed that MVA-BN vaccination was associated with stable anti-orthopoxvirus-binding IgG levels in elderly participants living with HIV or at risk for HIV acquisition. Of note, among older participants who probably received childhood smallpox vaccination using a live, replicating vaccine (eg, Dryvax, given before 1973), there was a detectable level of humoral immunity against mpox in the majority (approximately 80%). Importantly, birth before 1973 was associated with higher levels of IgG in both MVA-BN-vaccinated and MVA-BN-unvaccinated groups, which is consistent with recent findings [11, 13]. We also confirmed that HIV seropositivity was associated with lower anti-orthopoxvirus levels [8, 14]; however, this negative association was mostly seen in the MVA-BN-unvaccinated group.
Our study was limited by a small sample size, especially in the MVA-BN vaccination group. We acknowledge that only binding IgG levels were measured in our study, and we were not able to measure memory B-cell [15] and T-cell levels [8], which would reflect memory adaptive immune response to mpox re-exposure. In addition, we did not measure the neutralizing antibody levels, which would have a better correlation with protection. Based on our previous studies using the same platform, binding IgG levels were positively correlated with neutralizing antibody levels [11]. Another caveat was that vaccination status was by self-report, which could introduce recall bias; in addition, the MVA-BN-vaccinated and MVA-BN-unvaccinated groups may differ in unmeasured ways, including health-seeking behaviors, access to care, or perceived risks. Finally, most of the MVA-BN vaccines were non-Hispanic, Caucasian males living with HIV or at risk for HIV acquisition and were not representative of the Black and Hispanic communities disproportionately affected by mpox during the 2022 outbreak in the United States [16]. Additional studies inclusive of these representative populations are needed to better understand pre-existing immunity and immunity following MVA-BN vaccination and subsequent impact on protection against mpox.
In summary, we demonstrate that MVA-BN provides comparable humoral immunogenicity regardless of HIV serostatus and significantly increases anti-orthopoxvirus IgG levels that are sustained for 6–12 months postvaccination. In MVA-BN-unvaccinated PWH who previously received smallpox vaccinations, antibody levels were lower than among people without HIV. These findings may guide vaccination recommendations for those living with HIV, and especially for those of older age who received smallpox vaccinations in childhood.
Supplementary Material
Notes
Acknowledgments. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the study participants and the dedication of the staff at the MWCCS sites. They also thank Dr Carolyn Williams from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, for her insightful comments.
Author contributions. Study design: Y. L., B. J. C. M., K. S. H., M. B. T., and P. S. S. IgG assays: M. B. T., S. L., and P. S. S. Sample management: Q. E. T. and T. M. First draft and data analysis: Y. L. Critical reviews and comments: all authors.
MWCCS site PIs: E. A. T., F. J. P., M. J. M., J. B. B., M. L. A., A. N. S., M. F.-M., A. C., A. L. F., P. C. T., D. J. M., M. A., A. S., C. A. M., and C. R. R.
Financial support. Data in this manuscript were collected by the MACS/WIHS Combined Cohort Study (MWCCS). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). MWCCS (Principal Investigators): Atlanta CRS (Ighovwerha Ofotokun, Anandi Sheth, and Gina Wingood), U01-HL146241, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); Baltimore CRS (Todd Brown and Joseph Margolick), U01-HL146201, NHLBI; Bronx CRS (Kathryn Anastos, David Hanna, and Anjali Sharma), U01-HL146204, NHLBI; Brooklyn CRS (Deborah Gustafson and Tracey Wilson), U01-HL146202, NHLBI; Data Analysis and Coordination Center (Gypsyamber D'Souza, Stephen Gange, and Elizabeth Topper), U01-HL146193, NHLBI; Chicago-Cook County CRS (Mardge Cohen, Audrey French, and Ryan Ross), U01-HL146245, NHLBI; Chicago-Northwestern CRS (Steven Wolinsky, Frank Palella, and Valentina Stosor), U01-HL146240, NHLBI; Northern California CRS (Bradley Aouizerat, Jennifer Price, and Phyllis Tien), U01-HL146242, NHLBI; Los Angeles CRS (Roger Detels and Matthew Mimiaga), U01-HL146333, NHLBI; Metropolitan Washington CRS (Seble Kassaye and Daniel Merenstein), U01-HL146205, NHLBI; Miami CRS (Maria Alcaide, Margaret Fischl, and Deborah Jones), U01-HL146203, NHLBI; Pittsburgh CRS (Jeremy Martinson and Charles Rinaldo), U01-HL146208, NHLBI; UAB-MS CRS (Mirjam-Colette Kempf, James B. Brock, Emily Levitan, and Deborah Konkle-Parker), U01-HL146192, NHLBI; UNC CRS (M. Bradley Drummond and Michelle Floris-Moore), U01-HL146194, NHLBI. The MWCCS is funded primarily by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), with additional co-funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), National Institute on Aging (NIA), National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD), and in coordination and alignment with the research priorities of the National Institutes of Health, Office of AIDS Research (OAR). MWCCS data collection is also supported by UL1-TR000004 from National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) (UCSF CTSA), UL1-TR003098 (NCATS, JHU ICTR), UL1-TR001881 (NCATS, UCLA CTSI), P30-AI-050409 (NIAID, Atlanta CFAR), P30-AI-073961 (NIAID, Miami CFAR), P30-AI-050410 (NIAID, UNC CFAR), P30-AI-027767 (NIAID, UAB CFAR), P30-MH-116867 from National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) (Miami CHARM), UL1-TR001409 (NCATS, DC CTSA), KL2-TR001432 (NCATS, DC CTSA), and TL1-TR001431 (NCATS, DC CTSA). MWCCS specimens and data are the property of MWCCS. Access to individual-level data from the MACS/WIHS Combined Cohort Study Data (MWCCS) may be obtained upon review and approval of an MWCCS concept sheet. Links and instructions for online concept sheet submission are on the study website (http://mwccs.org/).
Contributor Information
Yijia Li, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Michael B Townsend, Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Shanshan Li, Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Quinn E Testa, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Tom Medvec, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Elizabeth A Thompson, Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Frank J Palella, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Matthew J Mimiaga, Fielding School of Public Health and David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
James B Brock, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Maria L Alcaide, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Anandi N Sheth, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Michelle Floris-Moore, Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Aruna Chandran, Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Audrey L French, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Phyllis C Tien, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Daniel J Merenstein, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Michael Augenbraun, Department of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Science University, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Anjali Sharma, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Caitlin A Moran, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Charles R Rinaldo, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Bernard J C Macatangay, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Panayampalli S Satheshkumar, Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ken S Ho, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary materials are available at Open Forum Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.
References
- 1. Titanji BK, Hazra A, Zucker J. Mpox clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches, and treatment strategies: a review. JAMA 2024; 332:1652–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.CDC. U.S. Case Trends: Clade II Mpox. Mpox. 2025; published online Jan 16. https://www.cdc.gov/mpox/data-research/cases/index.html. Accessed 26 January 2025.
- 3. Paniagua-García M, Casimiro-Soriguer CS, Chinchón D, et al. A case of fatal monkeypox infection: necropsy and molecular findings, with some considerations related to clinical management. Clin Microbiol Infect 2024; 30:395.e1–e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.CDC. Smallpox Vaccine. Smallpox. 2024; published online Nov 6. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/vaccines/index.html. Accessed 26 January 2025. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Deputy NP, Deckert J, Chard AN, et al. Vaccine effectiveness of JYNNEOS against mpox disease in the United States. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:2434–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hazra A, Zucker J, Bell E, et al. Mpox in people with past infection or a complete vaccination course: a global case series. Lancet Infect Dis 2024; 24:57–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Taha AM, Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Sah R. Mpox breakthrough infections: concerns and actions. Lancet Infect Dis 2023; 23:1216–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Mazzotta V, Lepri AC, Matusali G, et al. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of modified vaccinia Ankara pre-exposure vaccination against mpox according to previous smallpox vaccine exposure and HIV infection: prospective cohort study. eClinicalMedicine 2024; 68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Collier A-RY, McMahan K, Jacob-Dolan C, et al. Decline of mpox antibody responses after modified vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian nordic vaccination. JAMA 2024; 332:1669–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. D'Souza G, Bhondoekhan F, Benning L, et al. Characteristics of the MACS/WIHS combined cohort study: opportunities for research on aging with HIV in the longest US observational study of HIV. Am J Epidemiol 2021; 190:1457–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Priyamvada L, Carson WC, Ortega E, et al. Serological responses to the MVA-based JYNNEOS monkeypox vaccine in a cohort of participants from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Vaccine 2022; 40:7321–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ogale YP, Baird N, Townsend MB, et al. Evidence of mpox virus infection among persons without characteristic lesions or rash presenting for first dose of JYNNEOS vaccine-district of Columbia, August 2022. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 77:298–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Liu W-D, Chao T-L, Chen K-H, et al. Short-term evolution of mpox-specific IgG and neutralizing antibodies among individuals undergoing MVA-BN vaccination. Int J Infect Dis 2025; 153:107830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Moraes-Cardoso I, Benet S, Carabelli J, et al. Immune responses associated with mpox viral clearance in men with and without HIV in Spain: a multisite, observational, prospective cohort study. Lancet Microbe 2024; 5:100859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Oom AL, Wilson KK, Yonatan M, et al. The two-dose MVA-BN mpox vaccine induces a nondurable and low avidity MPXV-specific antibody response. J Virol 2025; 0:e00253-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kota KK, Hong J, Zelaya C, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in mpox cases and vaccination among adult males—United States, May-December 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023; 72:398–403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

