Abstract
Red yeast rice (RYR) is commonly used as colouring and flavouring agent in foods throughout East Asia. RYR contains monacolin K, a compound known to lower blood lipids level, which has led to its use as a health functional food in Korea. Additionally, RYR is frequently used as a food ingredient and is incorporated into processed foods such as bread and makgeolli, a traditional Korean alcoholic beverage. However adverse effects associated with RYR have been reported by several regulatory agencies, prompting the need for further investigation of its safety as a general food ingredient. To evaluate its safety, a 90-day feeding study was conducted using Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats, which were randomly assigned to three experimental groups. The experimental diets were prepared by replacing the corn starch in AIN 93G with RYR and/or white rice. Rats fed RYR showed lower body weight gain, accompanied by reduced food efficiency. No signs of toxicity were observed in serum clinical chemistry, relative organ weights, or histopathological analysis. However, hyperplasia and hypertrophy were observed in the thyroid, although the cause remained unclear. These results suggest that RYR exhibits a very low toxic potential, if any. Nevertheless, caution is advised regarding its expanded use, particularly among younger population, due to its growing inhibitory effects.
Keywords: Red yeast rice, 90-day feeding study, SD rats, Growth inhibition
Introduction
Red yeast rice (RYR) is a fermented product of ordinary rice (Oryza sativa) with certain mold species of Monascus (M. ruber, M. purpureus, M. pilosus, and M.floridanus) [1]. In East Asia, RYR has been used to make red colored liquor and other fermented food products for more than 600 years [2]. RYR has been allowed as a food additive for the coloring of meat, fish, and soybean products in China since 1982 [3]. In Japan, pigments of M. purpureus are approved for foodstuffs [4]. Furthermore, it is authorized as a Health Functional Food for lowering serum cholesterol levels in Korea [5].
The major monacolin in RYR is monacolin K, which has an identical structure to lovastatin [6]. Lovastatin has been shown to inhibit the activity of HMG-CoA reductase, which is a key rate-limiting enzyme involved in cholesterol synthesis. Lovastatin lowers the levels of plasma cholesterol by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis and inducting LDL receptors in the liver [7]. In addition, RYR also contains unsaturated fatty acids, which may help reduce triglyceride levels [8]. Several intervention studies have shown that RYR lowers elevated serum cholesterol, LDL-C and triglyceride levels [9–13].
However, it is important to note that since RYR contains lovastatin, the adverse effects of RYR are potentially the same as for lovastatin in general [13]. Case reports of four sources (the World Health Organization (WHO), the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES), the Italian Surveillance system, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)) have described adverse effects of RYR (e.g., myopathy, rhabdomyolysis, liver function alteration, nervous system disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, and skin disorders) as seen in lovastatin treatment [14]. In particular, statins, including lovastatin, have been associated with muscle-related adverse events such as myopathy and rhabdomyolysis [15]. Myopathy and rhabdomyolysis are also the most reported adverse effects of RYR [14]. Muscular pain was observed with or without creatine phosphokinase (CPK) increase as an adverse effect of RYR supplements in case reports [16–18]. The next most important target of adverse events of RYR after the muscle is the liver [14]. There have been reports of people suffering from acute hepatitis and elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels after consuming RYR-based products [17–19]. The Italian Surveillance system reported cases of gastrointestinal disorders associated with RYR-related products, and these disorders consisted mostly of dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain, and sometimes diarrhea [17]. In addition, the eruption of limbs, wheals, and pruritus cutaneous have been reported as adverse effects of food supplements containing RYR [17]. Also, some species of M. purpureus produce the mycotoxin citrinin, which is nephrotoxic [20]. In Korea, to ensure the safe consumption of RYR, the standard for citrinin in RYR as a health supplement ingredient is set at a maximum of 0.050 mg/kg, and this is regulated [5]. However, no regulations have yet been established for food ingredients in Korea. The European Commission Regulation No. 2023/915 sets the maximum permissible level of citrinin in rice fermented with M. purpureus at 0.1 mg/kg, considering the uncertainty surrounding its nephrotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and genotoxicity [21]. In April 2024, a fatal incident related to the consumption of RYR health products in Japan initially led to speculation that mold contamination and citrinin might be the cause. However, fortunately, following the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare’s announcement of the accident investigation in September, it was determined that the actual cause was the contamination of the product, puberulic acid, by improperly managed blue mold [22].
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Panel concluded that monacolins from RYR were a significant safety concern at an intake level of 10 mg/day from the available information on the adverse effects reported in humans. Furthermore, the Panel considered that there were severe adverse effects of monacolin K from RYR at use levels as low as 3 mg/day [14]. According to the case reports related to RYR intake, there were severe adverse effects of monacolin K from RYR at use levels of 3–30 mg/day [16–19]. In eleven European countries, including France, Austria, and Italy, the recommended daily intake of monacolin K for food supplements containing RYR ranges from 2 to 48 mg/day according to the Mintel Global New Products Database (Mintel GNPD) [14]. In South Korea, the specification of Health Functional Food requires that RYR contain monacolin K at a daily intake level of 4–8 mg/day [5]. Since RYR is consumed as a food ingredient as well as a Health Functional Food in Korea, it can be postulated that the consumption level of monacolin K may exceed the recommended daily intake level set for Health Functional Foods. The chronic intake levels of RYR-based products in the aforementioned European countries and Korea overlap with the ranges of doses that cause severe adverse effects, so it is necessary to check the safety of RYR by carrying out a 90-day feeding study. However, there are few in vivo studies assessing the safety of RYR, and among them, there is no toxicity test that analyzes muscles, the most representative adverse effect target of RYR. This study has a novelty different from previous studies in terms of analyzing biochemical and histopathological parameters of the brain, digestive, respiratory, circulatory, reproductive, urinary and endocrine organs as well as muscle. And in the present study, we have checked the safety of RYR by carrying out a 90-day feeding study in male SD rats. There was a report in which RYR extract (22 mg monacolin K/day) was administered to male and female rats for 26 weeks, but the adverse effects only appeared in male rats; the absolute and relative weight of the liver increased with dose-dependence [23]. In addition, the main target organs (muscle, liver, nervous system, gastrointestinal system, and skin) for the adverse effects of monacolin K from RYR in humans are not sex-specific [14]. Therefore, in accordance with the 3Rs principle, we used only male rats in this study.
Materials and methods
Chemicals
Lovastatin (analytical standard) were obtained Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and Citrinin (analytical standard) was purchased from Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation (Osaka, Japan). A methanol solution of citrinin (10 mg/mL) was prepared as a stock and diluted with methyl alcohol to prepare working standards with required concentrations. All stock solutions were stored at – 20 ℃ prior to use. For HPLC analysis, solvents with a purity of at least 99.9% HPLC grade were used, while solvents for proximate analysis were of Guaranteed Reagent grade or higher.
Test material
The RYR used in this experiment was prepared by fermenting white rice (Oryza sativa) with a 5% (v/w) inoculum of Monascus pilosus. For the control group, white rice sourced from Ganghwa-gun, which was identical to the rice used for RYR production, was utilized. The products were purchased from a local market in Korea. All samples were stored at – 80 ℃ immediately after purchase, freeze-dried, and subsequently analysed for monacolin K and citrinin content using HPLC.
Test diet
Test diets were prepared by replacing the corn starch of the AIN 93G with RYR and/or white rice. For the control diet, the whole corn starch of AIN 93G was replaced by white rice. The diet was replaced by a 1:1 mixture of RYR and white rice for the low-dose group and by RYR alone for the high-dose group. Therefore, the rats were fed with diets containing 0%, 20%, and 40% RYR, respectively. The compositions of the diets are shown in Table 1. All diets stored at 4 ℃ prior to use. And dietary nutrition, stability, and citrinin concentration of diet were confirmed analytically, as described later.
Table 1.
The composition of test feeds
| Ingredient (g/kg) | Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 20% RYR | 40% RYR | |
| Casein | 200.0 | 200.0 | 200.0 |
| l-Cystine | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| White rice | 397.5 | 198.7 | 0.0 |
| Red yeast rice | 0.0 | 198.7 | 397.5 |
| Maltodextrin | 132.0 | 132.0 | 132.0 |
| Sucrose | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Soybean oil | 70.0 | 70.0 | 70.0 |
| Cellulose | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Mineral Mix, AIN-93G-MX (94046) | 35.0 | 35.0 | 35.0 |
| Vitamin Mix, AIN-93-VX (94047) | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Choline Bitartrate | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| TBHQ, antioxidant | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 |
Proximate analysis
The moisture and ash contents (gravimetric) were determined based on methods outlined by the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (AOAC) [24]. The auto-Kjeldahl method was used to determine the crude protein content. The crude lipid was extracted with dimethyl ether using the Soxhlet method [24]. The crude fiber was determined by AOAC 978.10 [24]. The total carbohydrate content (%) was obtained by subtracting all other components from 100% (calculated as 100-(moisture + ash + crude protein + crude lipid + crude fiber)).
Stability
Monacolin K, the marker compound of RYR, was quantified to verify the stability of the RYR contained in the feed [5]. The feed was stored at 4 ℃ throughout the experiment. The analytical samples were taken at the start and end of the feeding experiment. The experimental feed (0.5 g) was extracted with 10 ml of 75% ethanol using a sonicator (Ultrasonicator, Wisd, Gangwon, Korea) for 1 h at 60 ℃. The extract was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min at 25 ℃. The supernatant was filtered with a 0.2 μm pore size filter into a 1 ml vial, and monacolin K was quantified by HPLC coupled with a UV–Vis Detector (Ultimate 3000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The analytical column was a C18 HPLC column (VDSpher OptiAqua C18, 5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm, VDS optilab, Berlin, Germany). The elution conditions involved a gradient of binary mobile phases: solvent A (phosphoric acid/water, 2/998, v/v) and B (acetonitrile). The gradient elution program was as follows: 0–30 min: solvent A from 65–35%, solvent B from 35–65%; 30–31 min: solvent A from 35–0%, solvent B from 65–100%, then holding for 14 min; 45–46 min: solvent A from 0–65%, solvent B from 100–35%, then holding until 60 min. The mobile-phase flow rate was 1.00 mL/min, and the oven temperature was 40 ℃. The chromatogram was detected by UV at 237 nm.
Citrinin estimation in diet
The test feed (2.5 g) was extracted with 25 ml of 70% ethanol by shaking it with a rotating shaker (SI-600R, Lab Companion, Jeiotech, Seoul, Korea) at 200 rpm for 1 h at 40 ℃. The extract was centrifuged with 3000 rpm for 5 min at 25 ℃. The supernatant was collected and concentrated under reduced pressure (Multivapor P-12, Buchi, Flawil, Switzerland) at 50 ℃. The concentrated sample was dissolved in 1 ml of methanol. Subsequently, the solution was filtered with a 0.2 μm pore size filter into a 1 ml vial, and citrinin was analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Ultimate 3000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with a fluorescence detector (FLD; Ultimate 3000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The analytical column was a C18 HPLC column (VDSpher OptiAqua C18, 5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm, VDS optilab, Berlin, Germany). The elution conditions involved a gradient of binary mobile phases: solvent A (phosphoric acid/water, pH was adjusted to 2.25) and B (acetonitrile). The gradient elution program was as follows: 0–9.45 min: solvent A from 50–20%, solvent B from 50–80%; 9.45–9.50 min: solvent A from 20–0%, solvent B from 80–100%, then holding for 10.5 min; 20–20.1 min: solvent A from 0–50%, solvent B from 100–50%, then holding until 30 min. The mobile-phase flow rate was 1.00 mL/min, and the oven temperature was 20 ℃. The excitation and emission wavelength were set at 331 nm and 500 nm, respectively.
Animals and maintenance
Male Sprague–Dawley rats (five weeks old) were obtained from Dooyeol Biotech Co., Ltd. (Seoul, Korea). The experiment was conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Seoul National University (approval number SNU-200721–3). The animals were housed in a room maintained at 22 ± 2 ºC with a relative humidity of 60–70% and exposed to a light and dark cycle of 12 h duration. During the experimental periods, drinking water and feed were provided ad libitum.
Sub-chronic toxicity study
Rats were randomly divided into three groups: Control (0% RYR; n = 5), low-dose (20% RYR; n = 5); and high-dose (40% RYR; n = 5). Feed and water were given for 90 days. Food intake and body weight were measured weekly, and all animals were closely monitored for any clinical signs. At the end of the experimental period, animals were euthanized by cardiac puncture under isoflurane anesthesia and blood sample was collected. In addition, Organ weight measurements and gross pathological and histopathological examinations were conducted.
Clinical chemistry
Blood was allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 min and then was centrifuged with 3000 rpm for 20 min at 4 ℃ to obtain the serum. The serum was stored at – 20 ℃ until analysis. A chemistry analyzer (DRI-CHEM 3500 s, FUJI Photo Film Co, Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure clinical parameters for GGT, ALT, AST, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), glucose (GLU), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), total bilirubin (T-BIL), calcium (Ca), inorganic phosphorus (IP), creatinine phosphokinase (CPK), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (T-CHOL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Clinical parameters for sodium (Na), potassium (K), chloride (Cl), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), thyroxine (T4), and triiodothyronine (T3) were commissioned to the Dooyeol Biotech (Seoul, Korea) for a clinical chemistry test.
Organ weight and histopathological studies
The brain, heart, prostate, gastrocnemius, adrenal, thymus, spleen, pancreas, testis, epididymis, urinary bladder, seminal vesicle, liver, lungs, kidney, stomach, and thyroid were removed and weighed. The ratio of organ to brain weight was calculated. For all animals in the control and high-dose groups, the liver, lungs, kidney, brain, stomach, thyroid, urinary bladder, and gastrocnemius tissues were fixed in 10% formalin, and the fixed tissues were commissioned to the Wonkwang University of Health for a histopathology test. They were embedded in paraffin, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and observed for any histological changes. A histopathological examination was also performed in one rat of the low-dose group for an epididymis in which visual findings were observed during autopsy.
Statistical analysis
Body weight, organ weight (absolute and relative), and clinical chemistry parameters were compared via one-way ANOVAs. When an ANOVA yielded a significant result (p < 0.05), Dunnett’s t-test was used for comparisons between each treatment group and the control group. No further testing was performed for non-significant ANOVA results. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was used to determine the correlation between RYR contents and food or energy efficiency.
Results
Feed composition
The proximate analysis of the experimental feeds revealed no significant differences in their moisture, carbohydrate, protein, ash, and fiber. However, the feeds of the low- and high-dose groups had significantly higher fat (20.9% and 29.8%, respectively) and energy (3.05% and 3.33%, respectively) than those of the control group (Table 2).
Table 2.
Proximate composition of the experimental feeds
| Group | Control | 20% RYR | 40% RYR |
|---|---|---|---|
| g/100 g diet | |||
| Moisture | 11.45 ± 0.37 | 10.12 ± 0.94 | 10.27 ± 0.62 |
| Carbohydrates | 56.83 ± 0.49 | 57.80 ± 2.63 | 56.37 ± 0.64 |
| Protein | 21.13 ± 0.12 | 20.40 ± 1.85 | 21.03 ± 0.99 |
| Fat | 5.37 ± 0.45 | 6.49 ± 0.20* | 6.97 ± 0.22* |
| Ash | 3.97 ± 0.03 | 3.91 ± 0.07 | 4.01 ± 0.09 |
| Fiber | 1.25 ± 0.65 | 1.26 ± 0.21 | 1.34 ± 0.50 |
| kcal/100 g diet | |||
| Energy | 360.3 ± 3.5 | 371.3 ± 4.7* | 372.3 ± 0.6** |
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3)
Significantly different from control by Dunnett’s t-test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Stability test of feeds
The result of stability test is presented in Table 3. There was no significant difference in monacolin K content between day 0 and day 90 for both the low-dose and high-dose feeds.
Table 3.
Monacolin K content in the experimental feeds (comparison between day 0 and day 90)
| Group | μg Monacolin K/g diet | |
|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 90 | |
| 20% RYR | 23.9 ± 1.2 | 24.3 ± 2.1 |
| 40% RYR | 47.0 ± 3.6 | 49.3 ± 2.9 |
No significant difference in monacolin K content between day 0 and day 90 for both the low-dose and high-dose feeds (p < 0.05)
Citrinin contents in feeds
The LOD values were determined by multiplying the ratio of the standard deviation to the slope by 3.3 times. The LOD value of the citrinin was 116.18 ppb. In the analysis of the experimental feeds, all values were below LOD.
Clinical signs and mortality
There were no clinical signs of toxicity or mortality during the experimental period at any of the dosage levels.
Body weight gain, food intake, and food efficiency
During the study period, the low and high-dose groups experienced a significant reduction (p < 0.01) in total weight gains (– 25.7% and – 20.9%, respectively) compared to that of the control group (Fig. 1, Table 4). The average food intake per cage was used as the food intake. The food efficiency and energy efficiency were calculated by dividing the average weight gain per cage by the food intake and by dividing the average weight gain per cage by the energy intake (Table 4). A decrease in food efficiency (– 14.95% and – 15.49% for the low and high dose, respectively) as well as energy efficiency (– 17.32% and – 18.18% for the low and high dose, respectively) compared to the control group was observed in both experimental groups (Table 4).
Fig. 1.
The changes in body weight of male SD rats fed with RYR for 90 days. Each data point is presented as mean ± standard deviation. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 are considered significantly different from the control group values
Table 4.
The food efficiency and intake of food, energy, RYR, and monacolin K of male SD rats fed with RYR for 90 days
| Group | Control | 20% RYR | 40% RYR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total weight gain(g) | 370.6 ± 40.1 | 275.4 ± 30.9** | 293.0 ± 15.9** |
| Average weight gain(g/day) | 4.12 ± 0.45 | 3.06 ± 0.34** | 3.26 ± 0.18** |
| Average food intake(g/day) | 24.97 ± 0.49 | 21.20 ± 1.29 | 23.40 ± 2.52 |
| FEa | 0.1666 ± 0.0096 | 0.1417 ± 0.0080 | 0.1408 ± 0.0064 |
| Average energy intake(kcal/day) | 89.98 ± 1.76 | 78.73 ± 4.80 | 87.11 ± 9.37 |
| EEb | 0.0462 ± 0.0027 | 0.0382 ± 0.0022 | 0.0378 ± 0.0017 |
| Red yeast rice intake(g/kg b.w./day) | 0 | 10.82 ± 0.16 | 22.84 ± 1.49 |
| Monacolin K intake(mg/kg b.w./day) | 0 | 1.310 ± 0.020 | 2.767 ± 0.180 |
Values are mean ± SD (n = 5)
aFE (food efficiency) = Average weight gain (g/day)/Average food intake (g/day)
bEE (energy efficiency) = Average weight gain (g/day)/Average energy intake (kcal/day)
Clinical chemistry
Except for the ALT, there were no significant differences in the clinical chemistry parameters in the low- and high-dose rats compared to those of the control rats (Table 5). The ALT of the low- and high-dose groups decreased compared with that of the control group (p < 0.05). However, all clinical chemistry parameters, excepting T4 (thyroxine), fell within the range of reference data of SD rats [25–31]. There was an increase in T4 levels compared to the control group in the low- and high-dose groups, without statistical significance (Table 5).
Table 5.
The clinical chemistry of male SD rats fed with RYR for 90 days
| Parameter | Unit | Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 20% RYR | 40% RYR | ||
| GGT | (U/l) | < 1 | < 1 | < 1 |
| ALT | (U/l) | 23.4 ± 4.3 | 16.6 ± 2.1* | 18.2 ± 2.8* |
| AST | (U/l) | 92.2 ± 29.2 | 66.2 ± 16.3 | 60 ± 5.0 |
| ALP | (U/l) | 360.4 ± 73.7 | 317.4 ± 73.3 | 305.4 ± 64.7 |
| GLU | (mg/dl) | 120 ± 22.6 | 132.4 ± 34.8 | 103 ± 19.3 |
| BUN | (mg/dl) | 12.7 ± 1.9 | 15.5 ± 2.8 | 14.2 ± 1.2 |
| CREATININE | (mg/dl) | 0.272 ± 0.037 | 0.322 ± 0.053 | 0.284 ± 0.035 |
| TP | (g/dl) | 6.56 ± 0.21 | 6.06 ± 0.38 | 6.00 ± 0.47 |
| ALB | (g/dl) | 3.90 ± 0.24 | 3.62 ± 0.40 | 3.64 ± 0.34 |
| T-BIL | (mg/dl) | 0.66 ± 0.45 | 0.36 ± 0.05 | 0.54 ± 0.43 |
| Ca | (mg/dl) | 10.46 ± 0.43 | 10.30 ± 0.93 | 10.14 ± 0.40 |
| IP | (mg/dl) | 8.20 ± 0.95 | 8.16 ± 1.01 | 7.84 ± 0.59 |
| CPK | (U/l) | 443.0 ± 221.8 | 284.4 ± 108.3 | 231.6 ± 61.6 |
| Na | (mmol/L) | 145.8 ± 3.7 | 150.2 ± 8.9 | 150.4 ± 3.8 |
| K | (mmol/L) | 6.66 ± 0.71 | 6.28 ± 1.21 | 7.54 ± 0.82 |
| Cl | (mmol/L) | 103.0 ± 0.7 | 105.4 ± 3.4 | 106.4 ± 0.9 |
| TG | (mg/dl) | 81.4 ± 40.0 | 76.4 ± 20.6 | 91.2 ± 30.6 |
| T-CHOL | (mg/dl) | 83.0 ± 15.7 | 80.2 ± 10.5 | 72.8 ± 7.1 |
| LDL-C | (mg/dl) | 7.54 ± 0.84 | 6.90 ± 1.41 | 6.88 ± 1.01 |
| HDL-C | (mg/dl) | 52.6 ± 10.5 | 49.0 ± 4.5 | 46.2 ± 5.2 |
| LDH | (U/l) | 810.6 ± 484.9 | 551.2 ± 324.0 | 547.0 ± 229.4 |
| TSH | (ng/mL) | 2.68 ± 2.10 | 1.58 ± 0.92 | 1.80 ± 1.03 |
| T4 | (ng/mL) | 50.49 ± 14.61 | 76.17 ± 12.55 | 75.73 ± 51.64 |
| T3 | (ng/mL) | 1.54 ± 0.27 | 1.61 ± 0.05 | 1.57 ± 0.02 |
GGT gamma-glutamyltransferase, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALP alkaline phosphatase GLU glucose, BUN blood urea nitrogen, TP total protein, ALB albumin, T-BIL total bilirubin, Ca calcium, IP inorganic phosphorus, CPK creatinine phosphokinase, Na sodium, K potassium, Cl chloride, TG triglyceride, T-CHOL total cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, TSH thyroid stimulating hormone, T4 thyroxine, T3 triiodothyronine
All data are given as mean ± standard deviation (n = 5)
*Significantly different from control by Dunnett’s t-test at p < 0.05
Organ weights
The absolute organ weights and the ratios of organ to brain weight in all groups are shown in Table 6. There were significant decreases in the liver, lungs, kidney, stomach, and thyroid weight in the low-dose group compared to those of the control group (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively). Among them, the relative weights of liver, kidney, and stomach to brain in the low-dose group showed a significant decrease compared to those of the control group (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively). There was no significant difference in the absolute or relative organ weights in the high-dose group compared to those of the control group.
Table 6.
The absolute organ weights (g) and the relative organ weights (g/g brain weight) of male SD rats fed with RYR for 90 days
| Absolute organ weights | Relative organ weights | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 20% RYR | 40% RYR | Control | 20% RYR | 40% RYR | |
| Brain | 2.25 ± 0.19 | 2.06 ± 0.05 | 2.16 ± 0.10 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 1.00 ± 0.00 |
| Heart | 1.65 ± 0.15 | 1.56 ± 0.11 | 1.54 ± 0.06 | 0.73 ± 0.06 | 0.76 ± 0.06 | 0.72 ± 0.05 |
| Prostate | 1.50 ± 0.40 | 1.75 ± 0.10 | 1.58 ± 0.20 | 0.67 ± 0.16 | 0.85 ± 0.07 | 0.73 ± 0.08 |
| Gastrocnemius | 4.35 ± 0.36 | 4.11 ± 0.24 | 4.27 ± 0.22 | 1.93 ± 0.03 | 2.00 ± 0.12 | 1.98 ± 0.14 |
| Adrenal | 0.0698 ± 0.0090 | 0.0734 ± 0.0060 | 0.0750 ± 0.0080 | 0.0319 ± 0.0043 | 0.0356 ± 0.0029 | 0.0349 ± 0.0044 |
| Thymus | 0.55 ± 0.13 | 0.42 ± 0.08 | 0.44 ± 0.07 | 0.2501 ± 0.0802 | 0.2062 ± 0.0381 | 0.2038 ± 0.0251 |
| Spleen | 1.04 ± 0.21 | 0.97 ± 0.20 | 0.88 ± 0.10 | 0.46 ± 0.10 | 0.47 ± 0.10 | 0.41 ± 0.03 |
| Pancreas | 1.65 ± 0.44 | 1.95 ± 0.48 | 1.68 ± 0.32 | 0.73 ± 0.16 | 0.95 ± 0.24 | 0.78 ± 0.15 |
| Testis | 3.95 ± 0.37 | 4.09 ± 0.24 | 3.67 ± 0.72 | 1.76 ± 0.24 | 1.99 ± 0.15 | 1.70 ± 0.30 |
| Epididymis | 1.58 ± 0.24 | 1.68 ± 0.34 | 1.31 ± 0.35 | 0.71 ± 0.11 | 0.82 ± 0.16 | 0.60 ± 0.15 |
| Urinary bladder | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.0591 ± 0.0122 | 0.0559 ± 0.0075 | 0.0689 ± 0.0111 |
| Seminal vesicle | 1.95 ± 0.22 | 1.92 ± 0.35 | 1.65 ± 0.22 | 0.87 ± 0.07 | 0.94 ± 0.18 | 0.76 ± 0.08 |
| Liver | 16.47 ± 1.70 | 12.56 ± 1.18** | 14.64 ± 0.73 | 7.32 ± 0.49 | 6.10 ± 0.54** | 6.80 ± 0.45 |
| Lungs | 2.07 ± 0.26 | 1.74 ± 0.13* | 1.88 ± 0.14 | 0.93 ± 0.15 | 0.85 ± 0.08 | 0.87 ± 0.04 |
| Kidney | 4.02 ± 0.34 | 3.15 ± 0.28** | 3.61 ± 0.22 | 1.79 ± 0.07 | 1.53 ± 0.13* | 1.67 ± 0.07 |
| Stomach | 2.21 ± 0.14 | 1.78 ± 0.13** | 2.11 ± 0.06 | 0.98 ± 0.06 | 0.87 ± 0.07* | 0.98 ± 0.07 |
| Thyroid | 0.0550 ± 0.0087 | 0.0410 ± 0.0098* | 0.0504 ± 0.0033 | 0.0247 ± 0.0051 | 0.0199 ± 0.0049 | 0.0234 ± 0.0022 |
All data are given as mean ± standard deviation (n = 5)
Significantly different from control by Dunnett’s t-test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Histopathology
There were no abnormal histopathological findings in the brain, urinary bladder, or gastrocnemius of the control and high-dose groups (Table 7). We focused on the histopathological findings shown only in the high-dose groups. A focal foamy macrophage infiltrate was observed in one object in the high-dose group, but this can be observed in normal lungs [32]. A case of basophilic cortical tubules was observed in the high-dose group, but it is also considered a normal feature in young growing rats, and it can be increased in an age-dependent manner [33]. In addition, the hyperplasia and hypertrophy in thyroids were observed in two objects in the high-dose group and are expected as a systemic response to increased pituitary secretion of TSH [34]. However, thyroid hormone tests showed no increase in TSH levels in the low- or high-dose group. In summary, except for the hyperplasia and hypertrophy in the thyroid, since all the histopathological observations were events that have often been reported in normal animals, they were considered to not be toxicologically significant.
Table 7.
The summary of histopathological findings
| Organ | Group (No. of Animals) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 40% RYR | ||
| Examined | 5 | 5 | |
| Brain | |||
| No finding noted | 5 | 5 | |
| Urinary bladder | |||
| No finding noted | 5 | 5 | |
| Gastrocnemius | |||
| No finding noted | 5 | 5 | |
| Liver | |||
| focal steatosis | Number of affected | 4 | 0 |
| Stomach | |||
| Focal glandular dilatation | Number of affected | 1 | 0 |
| Lung | |||
| Alveolar wall thickening | Number of affected | 5 | 5 |
| Alveolar congestion & edema | Number of affected | 5 | 5 |
| Focal peribronchial inflammatory cell infiltrates | Number of affected | 1 | 0 |
| Focal foamy macrophages infiltrates | Number of affected | 0 | 1 |
| Kidney | |||
| A few atrophy glomeruli | Number of affected | 5 | 5 |
| Protein casts | Number of affected | 5 | 4 |
| Focal interstitial inflammatory cell infiltrates | Number of affected | 2 | 2 |
| Cystic dilatation of tubules | Number of affected | 2 | 2 |
| Focal tubular degeneration | Number of affected | 1 | 0 |
| Focal areas of tubule basophilia | Number of affected | 0 | 1 |
| Thyroid | |||
| Minimal follicular cell hypertrophy & hyperplasia | Number of affected | 0 | 2 |
Discussion
We conducted a 90-day feeding study to check the safety of RYR as a general food ingredient. The daily intake of RYR and monacolin K in the low-dose group was 10.82 g/kg b.w./day and 1.310 mg/kg b.w./day, and in the high-dose group, was 22.84 g/kg b.w./day and 2.767 mg/kg b.w./day, respectively. Rats treated with RYR showed lower body weight gain as accompanied by low food efficiency. There were no signs of toxicity in serum clinical chemistry or relative organ weights, while the hyperplasia and hypertrophy in thyroids were observed in two objects in the high-dose group, and the low- and high-dose groups showed increases in T4 levels.
Citrinin is a mycotoxin produced by certain species of M. purpureus [20]. Its regulation varies internationally, with different countries setting distinct permissible limits for citrinin content in fermented red rice products. The European Union (EU) has established the maximum allowable level of 100 μg/kg in food supplements based on rice fermented with M. purpureus [21], while Japan and China set their limits at 200 μg/kg and 50 μg/kg in fermented red rice, respectively [35]. Taiwan allows up to 2000 μg/kg [36], and South Korea has no specific legal limits for citrinin in general food products; however, for functional foods, it is regulated at a maximum of 50 μg/kg [5]. In the present study, the citrinin concentration in all feed samples was below the detection limit of 116.18 μg/kg, which is within the regulatory thresholds established by the aforementioned countries. Additionally, the estimated citrinin intake was less than 2.79 μg/kg b.w./day, which is below the NOAEL of 20 μg/kg b.w./day, as reported in a previous 90-day oral toxicity study in rats[37]. Based on these findings, the contribution of citrinin to any observed toxicological effects in this study is considered negligible.
Although RYR is widely recognized for its lipid-lowering effects, it contains monacolin K, a naturally occurring HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, and thus has been associated with adverse effects similar to those of lovastatin. These include myopathy, rhabdomyolysis, liver dysfunction, gastrointestinal disturbances, and dermatological reactions [13, 14]. Among these, muscle-related side effects, particularly myopathy and rhabdomyolysis, have been the most frequently reported in human case studies [14, 15]. Liver-related adverse effects, including acute hepatitis and elevated liver enzymes (AST, ALT, GGT), have also been documented [17–19]. In the present study, however, no histopathological abnormalities were observed in the muscle (gastrocnemius) or liver tissues of either the control or high-dose groups (Table 7). Although serum ALT levels were significantly decreased in both the low- and high-dose groups compared to the control (p < 0.05), all other serum biochemical parameters remained within the normal reference ranges[25–31]. Importantly, a reduction in ALT alone is generally not considered toxicologically significant[38]. While reductions in absolute and relative liver weights were observed in the low-dose group, these changes were not dose-dependent and were not accompanied by biochemical or histopathological alterations. Therefore, these findings are interpreted as non-adverse effects possibly related to individual variation or feed intake, rather than RYR-induced organ toxicity.
The low- and high-dose groups experienced a significant reduction in total weight gain (– 25.7% and – 20.9%, respectively; p < 0.01) compared to the control group. Decrements in body weight gain by more than 10% compared to the control group are considered as a sensitive indicators of toxicity [39]. In addition, a decrease in food efficiency was observed in the low- and high-dose groups compared to the control group. As a result of Pearson correlation analysis, the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between the RYR content and food efficiency was – 0.628 (p < 0.05) and that between the RYR content and energy efficiency was – 0.706 (p < 0.01), which shows dose-dependency. These results suggest that RYR might inhibit growth in rats. The growth inhibition effect of RYR could partially be associated with the inhibition of the growth of Metanobrevibacter smithii, which lives in the intestine of rats. M. smithii is one of the methane-producing microbes that generates methane in the gut by utilizing hydrogen and carbon dioxide. During this process, undigested polysaccharides are fermented by gut bacteria into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which are absorbed in the gut and used as an energy source in the body. In other words, M. smithii has a significant impact on the host's energy extraction efficiency. Faseleh Jahromi, et al. reported that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (such as lovastatin) inhibit the growth of M. smithii [34]. Additionally, a study by Samuel and Gordon showed that when Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and M. smithii were co-colonized in mice, there was a greater weight gain compared to the colonization of B. thetaiotaomicron alone [40]. Notably, M. smithii constitutes approximately 94% of the methane-producing microbial population in the human digestive tract [41]. Therefore, the intake of RYR may influence human nutritional efficiency. Further, RYR also contains various sterols such as β-sitosterol, campesterol, stigmasterol, and sapogenin [2, 10, 11]. Phytosterols have also been reported to be involved in the reduction of weight gain and are known to directly affect intestinal energy absorption [40, 42].
The ratio of organ weight to brain weight can be a more reliable indicator of toxicity than the ratio of organ weight to body weight; this is because brain weight is rarely affected nonspecifically by toxicity, whereas body weight is more variable and may change as a result of toxicity [39]. There were significant differences in organ to brain weight only in the low-dose group compared to the control group. Since no dose-dependency nor changes in other markers (biochemical or histopathological) for corresponding organs were observed, it was difficult to verify organ toxicity.
RYR is known to lower the serum concentration of total cholesterol, LDL-C, and triglyceride. In the present study, lipid lowering effect was not observed. There were slight reductions in total cholesterol and LDL-C levels in the low- and high-dose rats compared to the control rats, without statistical significance and no decrease in triglyceride level. These results are concerned to be because this study focused on adverse effects and, unlike other efficacy studies, was conducted on normal rats that were not hyperlipidemic.
The decrease in body weight gain and the histopathological alterations observed in thyroid tissue in the high-dose group (refer to Results) prompted an investigation of thyroid hormone levels. Although not statistically significant, the low- and high-dose groups exhibited increases in serum T4 levels (50.89% and 49.99%, respectively). These trends suggest a potential association between RYR intake and altered thyroid function. Furthermore, the follicular cell hyperplasia and hypertrophy observed in the high-dose group are reminiscent of changes previously reported in rats treated with simvastatin, another HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor [43], suggesting a potential role for monacolin K. In the study by Smith et al., simvastatin treatment induced hepatomegaly and thyroid hypertrophy, which were associated with increased hepatic functional capacity and enhanced thyroxine clearance, ultimately resulting in elevated TSH levels [43]. The TSH elevation was presumed to mediate the observed proliferation and hypertrophy of thyroid follicular cells [43]. However, in the present study, although the changes were not statistically significant, a trend toward increased serum T4 levels was observed, making it difficult to directly apply the mechanistic conclusions of Smith et al.'s findings to our results. Additionally, no significant differences in TSH or T3 levels were found compared to the control group, suggesting that dysregulation of the pituitary–thyroid axis alone may not fully explain the observed thyroid histopathology. Alternatively, secondary factors such as metabolic stress or nutritional imbalance induced by the 90-day RYR administration may have contributed to these histological alterations. Weight gain loss and reduced caloric efficiency may have influenced systemic endocrine responses, including thyroid activity [44]. Taken together, these findings highlight the need for further investigations to elucidate the mechanisms by which RYR modulates thyroid follicular cell dynamics and to determine how these effects may be linked to the growth-inhibitory outcomes observed in RYR-treated rats.
In summary, the results of this study suggest that red yeast has subchronic toxic potential, particularly affecting weight gain, food efficiency, and thyroid function in both low and high-dose groups. Reductions in body weight gain are recognized as sensitive indicators of toxicity [39] and may have serious adverse effects during developmental periods such as childhood and adolescents. This study was conducted in SD rats aged 6 to 19 weeks, which corresponds to the human age range of approximately 6 to 14 years based on weaning and sexual maturity [45]. Therefore, our findings support that children and adolescents should be more cautious about RYR intake. In addition, further studies are warranted to clarify the mechanisms by which RYR influences growth and thyroid function and to determine safe intake levels, especially for children and adolescents.
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, analysis and writing-original draft were performed by Hayoung Lee. Supervision, project administration and writing-review and editing were performed by Byungkyung Do and Hoonjeong Kwon. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Seoul National University. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the author upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
Ethics approval
The experiment was conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Seoul National University.
Consent to publish
The authors confirm that all participants provided consent for the publication of their data.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Kumari HPM, Naidu KA, Vishwanatha S, Narasimhamurthy K, Vijayalakshmi G (2009) Safety evaluation of Monascus purpureus red mould rice in albino rats. Food Chem Toxicol 47:1739–1746. 10.1016/j.fct.2009.04.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ma J, Li Y, Ye Q, Li J, Hua Y, Ju D, Zhang D, Cooper R, Chang M (2000) Constituents of red yeast rice, a traditional chinese food and medicine. J Agric Food Chem 48:5220–5225. 10.1021/jf000338c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chinese Ministry of Public Health (1982) Modern Food Additive Standards of the Chinese Ministry of Public Health. China, Beijing [Google Scholar]
- 4.Blanc PJ, Loret MO, Santerre AL, Pareilleux A, Prome D, Prome JC, Laussac JP, Goma G (1994) Pigments of Monascus. J Food Sci 59:862–865. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1994.tb08145.x [Google Scholar]
- 5.MFDS (2021) Regulations concerning recognition of functional ingredients and standards and specifications for health functional foods. Korea Food & Drug Administration [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hong MY, Seeram NP, Zhang Y, Heber D (2008) Anticancer effects of Chinese red yeast rice versus monacolin K alone on colon cancer cells. J Nutr Biochem 19:448–458. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2007.05.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chao Y, Chen JS, Hunt VM, Kuron GW, Karkas JD, Liou R, Alberts AW (1991) Lowering of plasma cholesterol levels in animals by lovastatin and simvastatin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 40:S11–S14. 10.1007/bf03216281 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang J, Lu Z, Chi J, Wang W, Su M, Kou W, Yu P, Yu L, Chen L, Zhu J-S, Chang J (1997) Multicenter clinical trial of the serum lipid-lowering effects of a Monascus purpureus (red yeast) rice preparation from traditional Chinese medicine. Curr Ther Res 58:964–978. 10.1016/S0011-393X(97)80063-X [Google Scholar]
- 9.Heinz T, Schuchardt JP, Möller K, Hadji P, Hahn A (2016) Low daily dose of 3 mg monacolin K from RYR reduces the concentration of LDL-C in a randomized, placebo-controlled intervention. Nutr Res 36:1162–1170. 10.1016/j.nutres.2016.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Heber D, Yip I, Ashley JM, Elashoff DA, Elashoff RM, Go VLW (1999) Cholesterol-lowering effects of a proprietary Chinese red-yeast-rice dietary supplement. Am J Clin Nutr 69:231–236. 10.1093/ajcn/69.2.231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lin CC, Li TC, Lai MM (2005) Efficacy and safety of Monascus purpureus Went rice in subjects with hyperlipidemia. Eur J Endocrinol Eur J Endocrinol 153:679–686. 10.1530/eje.1.02012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Becker DJ, Gordon RY, Halbert SC, French B, Morris PB, Rader DJ (2009) Red yeast rice for dyslipidemia in statin-intolerant patients: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 150:830–839, w147-839. 10.7326/0003-4819-150-12-200906160-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bogsrud MP, Ose L, Langslet G, Ottestad I, Strøm EC, Hagve T-A, Retterstøl K (2010) HypoCol (red yeast rice) lowers plasma cholesterol—a randomized placebo controlled study. Scan Cardiovasc J 44:197–200. 10.3109/14017431003624123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.EFSA Ans Panel, Younes M, Aggett P, Aguilar F, Crebelli R, Dusemund B, Filipič M, Frutos MJ, Galtier P, Gott D, Gundert-Remy U, Kuhnle GG, Lambré C, Leblanc J-C, Lillegaard IT, Moldeus P, Mortensen A, Oskarsson A, Stankovic I, Waalkens-Berendsen I, Woutersen RA, Andrade RJ, Fortes C, Mosesso P, Restani P, Pizzo F, Smeraldi C, Wright M (2018) Scientific opinion on the safety of monacolins in red yeast rice. EFSA J 16:e05368. 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Golomb BA, Evans MA (2008) Statin adverse effects. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 8:373–418. 10.2165/0129784-200808060-00004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Venhuis BJ, van Hunsel F, van de Koppel S, Keizers PHJ, Jeurissen SMF, De Kaste D (2016) Pharmacologically effective red yeast rice preparations marketed as dietary supplements illustrated by a case report. Drug Test Anal 8:315–318. 10.1002/dta.1929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mazzanti G, Moro PA, Raschi E, Da Cas R, Menniti-Ippolito F (2017) Adverse reactions to dietary supplements containing red yeast rice: assessment of cases from the Italian surveillance system. Br J Clin Pharmacol 83:894–908. 10.1111/bcp.13171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lapi F, Gallo E, Bernasconi S, Vietri M, Menniti-Ippolito F, Raschetti R, Gori L, Firenzuoli F, Mugelli A, Vannacci A (2008) Myopathies associated with red yeast rice and liquorice: spontaneous reports from the Italian Surveillance System of Natural Health Products. Br J Clin Pharmacol 66:572–574. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03224.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Grieco A, Miele L, Pompili M, Biolato M, Vecchio FM, Grattagliano I, Gasbarrini G (2009) Acute hepatitis caused by a natural lipid-lowering product: when “alternative” medicine is no “alternative” at all. J Hepatol 50:1273–1277. 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.02.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Blanc PJ, Loret MO, Goma G (1995) Production of citrinin by various species of Monascus. Biotech Lett 17:291–294. 10.1007/BF01190639 [Google Scholar]
- 21.European Comission (2023) On maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006, in 2023/915. Official Journal of the European Union
- 22.Murata Y, Hemmi S, Akiya Y, Miyasato K, Kobayashi H, Maruyama T, Abe M (2024) Certain red yeast rice supplements in japan cause acute tubulointerstitial injury. Kidney Int Rep 9:2824–2828. 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.06.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gao Y, Chen X, Li C, Wang H, Tian J, Fu F (2020) Toxicological evaluation of, red rice yeast extract, Xuezhikang: acute, 26-week chronic and genotoxicity studies. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 114:104654. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.AOAC (2005) Official methods of analysis
- 25.Giknis MLA,Clifford CB (2006) Clinical laboratory parameters for Crl: CD (SD) rats. Charles River Laboratories
- 26.Han ZZ, Xu HD, Kim KH, Ahn TH, Bae JS, Lee JY, Gil KH, Lee JY, Woo SJ, Yoo HJ (2010) Reference data of the main physiological parameters in control Sprague-Dawley rats from pre-clinical toxicity studies. Lab Anim Res 26:153–164. 10.5625/lar.2010.26.2.153 [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ihedioha JI, Noel-Uneke OA, Ihedioha TE (2013) Reference values for the serum lipid profile of albino rats (Rattus norvegicus) of varied ages and sexes. Comp Clin Pathol 22:93–99. 10.1007/s00580-011-1372-7 [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee JM, Lee MA, Do HN, Bae RJN, Lee MJ, Kim MJ, Jang HS, Park SH, Lee HY, Kang JS (2012) Historical control data from 4-week repeated toxicity studies in Crj: CD (SD) rats. Biomed Sci Lett 18:268–275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lee JM, Lee MA, Do HN, Song YI, Lee HY, Park SH, Kang JS, Jk K (2012) Historical control data from 13-week repeated toxicity studies in Crj: CD (SD) rats. Lab Anim Res 28:115–121. 10.5625/lar.2012.28.2.115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Matsuzawa T, Nomura M, Unno T (1993) Clinical pathology reference ranges of laboratory animals. J Vet Med Sci 55:351–362. 10.1292/jvms.55.351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Petterino C, Argentino-Storino A (2006) Clinical chemistry and haematology historical data in control Sprague-Dawley rats from pre-clinical toxicity studies. Exp Toxicol Pathol 57:213–219. 10.1016/j.etp.2005.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.National Toxicology Program (2015) Lung-infiltration cellular, histiocyte.https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/nnl/respiratory/lung/infilt/index.htm. Accessed 13 Dec 2021
- 33.Frazier KS, Seely JC, Hard GC, Betton G, Burnett R, Nakatsuji S, Nishikawa A, Durchfeld-Meyer B, Bube A (2012) Proliferative and nonproliferative lesions of the rat and mouse urinary system. Toxicol Pathol 40:14S-86S. 10.1177/0192623312438736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.National Toxicology Program (2014) Thyroid gland, follicular cell-hypertrophy. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/atlas/nnl/endocrine-system/thyroid-gland/FollicularCell-Hypertrophy. Accessed 13 Dec 2021
- 35.Farawahida AH, Palmer J, Flint S (2022) Monascus spp. and citrinin: Identification, selection of Monascus spp. isolates, occurrence, detection and reduction of citrinin during the fermentation of red fermented rice. Int J Food Microbiol 379:109829. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Administration TFaD (2000) Specification standards for red yeast rice health food
- 37.EFSA (2012) Scientific Opinion on the risks for public and animal health related to the presence of citrinin in food and feed. EFSA J 10:2605. 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2605 [Google Scholar]
- 38.Senior JR (2012) Alanine aminotransferase: a clinical and regulatory tool for detecting liver injury-past, present, and future. Clin Pharmacol Ther 92:332–339. 10.1038/clpt.2012.108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.FAO/WHO (2009) Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food. Chapter 4: hazard identification and characterization; toxicological and human studies. Environmental health criteria 240. World Health Organization Press
- 40.Ebine N, Demonty I, Jia X (2005) Jones PJH (2006) Plant stanol ascorbate esters reduce body weight gain through decreased energy absorption in hamsters. Int J Obes 30:751–757. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Scanlan PD, Shanahan F, Marchesi JR (2008) Human methanogen diversity and incidence in healthy and diseased colonic groups using mcrA gene analysis. BMC Microbiol 8:79. 10.1186/1471-2180-8-79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Furlan CPB, AyC M, Marineli RdS, Maróstica MR (2013) Conjugated linoleic acid and phytosterols counteract obesity induced by high-fat diet. Food Res Int 51:429–435. 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.12.023 [Google Scholar]
- 43.Smith PF, Grossman SJ, Gerson RJ, Gordon LR, Deluca JG, Majka JA, Wang RW, Germershausen JI, MacDonald JS (1991) Studies on the mechanism of simvastatin-induced thyroid hypertrophy and follicular cell adenoma in the rat. Toxicol Pathol 19:197–205. 10.1177/019262339101900301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Agnihothri RV, Courville AB, Linderman JD, Smith S, Brychta R, Remaley A, Chen KY, Simchowitz L, Celi FS (2014) Moderate weight loss is sufficient to affect thyroid hormone homeostasis and inhibit its peripheral conversion. Thyroid 24:19–26. 10.1089/thy.2013.0055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sengupta P (2013) The laboratory rat: relating its age with human’s. Int J Prev Med 4:624 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the author upon reasonable request.

