Abstract
This cross-sectional study examines pharmaceutical marketing of stimulants to physicians and advanced practice clinicians and its influence on stimulant use after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Stimulant prescribing has increased sharply since the COVID-19 pandemic and remains elevated.1 Although stimulants are an effective treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), rising use has raised concerns about overprescribing and misuse.2 Postpandemic telehealth expansions might partly explain these trends by reducing barriers to obtaining ADHD medications,3 but pharmaceutical marketing is another potential contributor. The relationship between pharmaceutical marketing and prescribing behavior is well established.4 Previous research documented substantial stimulant marketing to physicians from 2014 to 2018, peaking in 2016,5 but how these practices have changed postpandemic remains unclear. We examined trends in stimulant marketing from 2021 to 2023, including newly available data on marketing to advanced practice clinicians (APCs), a group of growing importance given recent state laws expanding their authority to prescribe controlled substances (eg, stimulants).6
Methods
Data on pharmaceutical industry stimulant marketing payments (eg, meals and speaking fees) were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Open Payments Program from 2021 (the first year APCs were included) to 2023 (eMethods in Supplement 1). Payments were identified as related to at least 1 stimulant medication (eTable 1 in Supplement 1). We quantified the annual total value of payments separately for physicians and APCs, by specialty and by drug annually from 2021 to 2023. We also quantified the overall percentage (number of active clinicians receiving any payment), number of clinicians receiving payments exceeding $5000 in any year, total payments, and average individual payment for each specialty or subspecialty from 2021 to 2023. Numbers of active clinicians by specialty or subspecialty were obtained from the December 2023 National Plan and Provider Enumeration System. We converted all payments to 2023 US dollars using a consumer price index (eTable 2 in Supplement 1).
Analyses were performed using Stata 18 (StataCorp LLC). This study of publicly available data was exempt from review and informed consent per the Common Rule (US 45 CFR part 46) and followed the STROBE reporting guideline for cross-sectional studies.
Results
Among physicians, total stimulant marketing payments doubled from $1.8 million in 2021 to $3.6 million in 2023 (Figure, A). Among APCs, payments tripled from $0.5 million in 2021 to $1.6 million in 2023. These trends were largely driven by growth in marketing to psychiatrists (by $1.2 million from 2021 to 2023, representing a 250% increase) and nurse practitioners (by $0.8 million from 2021 to 2023, representing a 300% increase; Figure, B). By product, marketing growth was highest for Azstarys (serdexmethylphenidate/dexmethylphenidate) (increased by $2.4 million, or 580%; Figure, C).
Figure. Growth in Annual Stimulant Marketing Payments Overall, by Clinical Specialty, and by Stimulant Product, 2021 to 2023.

Data are from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Open Payments and in constant 2023 US dollars. In panel B, psychiatry includes adolescent psychiatry, and pediatrics includes adolescent medicine. Other clinicians include family medicine, neurology, internal medicine, and physician assistants, as well as all other clinician types listed under the “other physicians” and “other advanced practice clinicians” categories listed in the footnotes to the Table. In panel C, payments might be related to multiple stimulant products. Generic drug names for each of the branded products listed are as follows: Azstarys (serdexmethylphenidate/dexmethylphenidate), Jornay (methylphenidate), Dyanavel (amphetamine), and Vyvanse (lisdexamfetamine).
Psychiatrists and pediatricians—including those in adolescent-focused subspecialties—were the specialties with the highest percentage of clinicians in their respective specialties receiving any payment (5.9% to 10.5%) (Table). However, nurse practitioners accounted for the highest number of unique clinicians receiving payments (18 676). The frequency of clinicians receiving payments exceeding $5000 annually, total payments, and average individual payments were highest for adolescent psychiatrists and psychiatrists.
Table. Stimulant Marketing by Specialty and Subspecialty, 2021 to 2023a.
| Specialty | Clinicians | Payments, $ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receiving payments | No. paid>$5000 in any year | Total | Mean (SD) | ||
| % Active | No. | ||||
| Physicians | 1.1 | 25 339 | 155 | 8 473 374 | 42.1 (248.1) |
| Adolescent medicine | 10.5 | 476 | 3 | 204 581 | 42.9 (198.2) |
| Adolescent psychiatry | 9.9 | 927 | 42 | 1 083 567 | 84.1 (445.7) |
| Pediatrics | 8.2 | 9716 | 20 | 2 358 004 | 25.8 (125.8) |
| Psychiatry | 5.9 | 4086 | 71 | 3 362 307 | 72.9 (373.0) |
| Family medicine | 3.0 | 6224 | 1 | 482 652 | 19.5 (52.2) |
| Neurology | 1.8 | 602 | 11 | 408 344 | 49.3 (304.7) |
| Internal medicine | 0.6 | 2210 | 4 | 198 563 | 27.8 (169.2) |
| Otherb | 0.1 | 1098 | 3 | 375 356 | 61.8 (322.8) |
| Advanced practice clinicians | 3.2 | 23 731 | 7 | 3 055 999 | 20.0 (37.6) |
| Nurse practitioner | 4.1 | 18 676 | 5 | 2 360 360 | 20.3 (39.3) |
| Physician assistant | 2.4 | 4665 | 0 | 628 323 | 18.7 (23.8) |
| Otherc | 0.4 | 390 | 2 | 67 316 | 24.6 (79.7) |
Data are from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Open Payments, 2021 to 2023, and in constant 2023 US dollars. Data on the number of active clinicians of each specialty (the denominator in column 2) is from the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System.
Includes allergy and immunology, anesthesiology, dermatology, emergency medicine, nuclear medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, ophthalmology, preventive medicine, surgery, and other specialties.
Includes anesthesiology assistants, certified nurse midwives, certified registered nurse anesthetists, and clinical nurse specialists.
Discussion
Stimulant marketing to clinicians rose sharply from 2021 to 2023. Although payments to physicians remain roughly 40% below the 2016 peak reported in previous research,5 the decline has sharply reversed, with payments to physicians more than doubling from 2021 to 2023. Payments to APCs, particularly nurse practitioners, are also rising and at an even faster rate. This latter marketing pattern mirrors national prescribing data: since the pandemic, nurse practitioners have become the fastest-growing group of stimulant prescribers, surpassing psychiatrists in 2022 by number of prescriptions written.1
These findings suggest a notable shift in pharmaceutical marketing strategy and raise concerns about its potential role in rising stimulant use. Future research correlating stimulant marketing with prescribing behavior is needed to examine how marketing influences clinical decision-making, prescribing appropriateness, and health outcomes. Study limitations included reliance on industry-reported payments, inability to identify APCs with pediatric or psychiatric subspecialties, and lack of data on free medication samples.
eMethods.
eTable 1. Stimulant products (generic drug names) included in the analysis
eTable 2. Consumer price index (CPI) used for inflation adjustment
eReferences.
Data Sharing Statement
References
- 1.IQVIA Government Solutions. Stimulant prescription trends in the United States from 2012-2022. August 31, 2023. https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/drug_chem_info/stimulants/IQVIA_Report_on_Stimulant_Trends_from_2012-2022.pdf
- 2.LaBossier NJ, Hadland SE. Stimulant misuse among youth. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2022;52(9):101265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nagappan A, Miller A, Jain S, Oakes AH. Stimulant, antidepressant, and opioid telehealth prescription trends between 2019 and 2022. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(9):e2433334. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mitchell AP, Trivedi NU, Gennarelli RL, et al. Are financial payments from the pharmaceutical industry associated with physician prescribing?: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(3):353-361. doi: 10.7326/M20-5665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hadland SE, Cerdá M, Earlywine JJ, Krieger MS, Anderson TS, Marshall BDL. Analysis of pharmaceutical industry marketing of stimulants, 2014 through 2018. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(4):385-387. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.5526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cusimano LD, Maestas N. High-risk opioid prescribing and nurse practitioner independence. JAMA Health Forum. 2024;5(12):e244544. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
eMethods.
eTable 1. Stimulant products (generic drug names) included in the analysis
eTable 2. Consumer price index (CPI) used for inflation adjustment
eReferences.
Data Sharing Statement
