Skip to main content
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases logoLink to Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
. 2025 Aug 25;20:455. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03653-z

Cutaneous manifestations-associated with tuberous sclerosis complex and the use of topical rapamycin in the United States: a sub-analysis of an international survey of caregivers and patients

Sreedevi Boggarapu 1,, Gabrielle Rushing 2, Ashley Pounders 2, Steven L Roberds 2, Eric Beresford 1
PMCID: PMC12379466  PMID: 40855504

Abstract

Background

This analysis was aimed to characterize cutaneous manifestations associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and management of facial angiofibroma in the United States from a patient/caregiver perspective. Data was collected from an international survey of TSC Alliance conducted during May-June 2017 by distributing a link to patients/caregivers through various channels including social media.

Results

Of the 418 caregivers and 133 patients, 336 (80.0%) caregivers and 98 (73.7%) patients reported cutaneous manifestations. Increased incidence in cutaneous manifestations was observed with age with the highest incidence in the age group spanning 27–45 years. More than half of the responders reported minor, moderate or major changes to their lifestyle because of the impact of cutaneous manifestations on the quality of life. The presence of other TSC-related manifestations studied in this survey (epilepsy, non-malignant brain tumours, developmental delay, learning or memory issues, kidney issues, communication issues, behavioural issues, sleep problems, anxiety or depression, heart issues, eye issues, dental issues, bone or skeletal issues, lung issues, and liver or pancreatic issues) was significantly higher in patients with cutaneous manifestations. Surgical removal was reported by 28.6% caregivers and 61.2% patients. Compounded topical rapamycin use for the management of facial angiofibroma was reported by 31.3% caregivers/23.5% patients, out of whom, improvement in skin condition was reported by 64.8% caregivers/69.6% patients. Overall, 82.9% of caregivers and 73.9% patients reported improvement as moderately effective or very effective.

Conclusions

In patients with cutaneous manifestations, a higher frequency of other TSC manifestations was observed. Presence of cutaneous manifestations impacted the quality of life of more than half of the responders. Surgical removal of cutaneous manifestations and compounded topical rapamycin treatment for the management of facial angiofibroma were reported. Compounded topical rapamycin use for the management of facial angiofibroma was reported as moderately effective or very effective by most of the responders.

Keywords: Facial angiofibroma, Mechanistic target of rapamycin, Surgical removal, Topical rapamycin, Tuberous sclerosis complex

Introduction

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a rare autosomal dominant genetic disorder with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 5,800 live births [1, 2]. Loss of function mutations in TSC1 or TSC2 genes encoding hamartin and tuberin, respectively, cause TSC by interfering with the cell’s ability to negatively regulate the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway [1, 3, 4]. TSC is characterized by the presence of hamartomas, non-malignant tumors, and other lesions in multiple organs, predominantly on the skin and in the brain, kidneys, lungs, and heart that can lead to organ dysfunction [1].

Cutaneous manifestations such as facial angiofibroma, ungual fibroma, hypopigmented macules, fibrous cephalic plaques and shagreen patches can affect > 90% of patients with TSC [5]. Physical removal of facial angiofibroma with laser and microdermabrasion is in clinical practice [4, 6]. However, clinical outcomes of these treatments have been unsatisfactory due to pain, hyperpigmentation, scarring, bleeding, and recurrence of lesions [4]. Use of systemic mTOR inhibitors have shown ancillary improvement of facial angiofibroma during therapy for other manifestations [7, 8].

Topical mTOR inhibitors reduced the size and improved the color of facial angiofibroma in multiple clinical trials and case reports [915], which was maintained over time [1517], and was further confirmed in a post marketing surveillance conducted in Japan [18]. In theUnited States , ~ 25% of patients with facial angiofibroma were reported to use compounded topical rapamycin as the treatment and < 20% patients received laser or abrasive treatments based on data analysis from the TSC Alliance Natural History Database conducted before the approval of topical sirolimus 0.2% gel [19].

An international survey was conducted in 2017 by the TSC Alliance to understand the perspectives of patients with TSC or their caregivers as part of an externally led patient focused drug development meeting (PFDD). In this article, we present the sub-analysis of data on TSC cutaneous manifestations and treatment trends for facial angiofibroma in the United States, focusing on topical rapamycin.

Methods

The TSC Alliance conducted an international drug development survey between 15th May 2017 to 14th June 2017 in English, Spanish, and French, which was made available to patients and caregivers through various channels including social media. A total of 1,309 survey responses were received from patients with TSC or their caregivers, or from patients with sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) representing 57 countries, with the United States (66.5% of responders) being the most well-represented country. Data from 418 caregivers and 133 patients with TSC who responded from the United States was used for the analysis. The survey was designed to understand the perspectives of patients with TSC or their caregivers regarding the impact of TSC manifestations on daily lives, the benefits and limitations of existing treatments, and their priorities for new treatments. The survey included 26 questions for caregivers answering on behalf of dependent patients and 21 questions for patients with TSC aged 13 years or older who were able to answer for themselves [20]. This sub-analysis of the survey is focused on the characterization of cutaneous manifestations of TSC in the United States including the data of responders on the English version.

The subgroup analysis included the variables of age at time of survey, age at time of TSC diagnosis, and the presence and number of TSC-related manifestations reported for each individual. Data were collected on 17 TSC-related manifestations including epilepsy, developmental delay or intellectual disability, sleep issues, behavioral or social issues, cutaneous manifestations (including facial angiofibroma) communication problems, learning or memory issues, anxiety and depression, kidney issues, nonmalignant brain tumors, heart issues, dental issues, eye issues, liver/pancreas issues, bone or skeletal issues, lung issues, and lymphatic issues.

No protected health information was collected. Age of patients at the time of the survey and at the time of TSC diagnosis were collected as the following age groups: 0–23 months, 2–5 Years, 6–12 years, 13–17 years, 18–26 years, 27–45 years, and ≥ 46 years. Impact of cutaneous manifestations on lifestyle was collected as degree of change in lifestyle due to cutaneous manifestation using the following scale: no change, minor change, moderate change, and severe change. Caregiver responses for the impact of cutaneous manifestations were analyzed by the age groups of patients (≥ 13 years or < 13 years), enabling comparison to the group of patients ≥ 13 years old who were able to answer for themselves. Data was collected on the use of topical rapamycin for the management of facial angiofibroma and procedures for surgical removal of cutaneous manifestations (laser therapy, microdermabrasion, etc.). The use of topical rapamycin was analyzed by age groups reported at the time of the survey. Data collected on oral mTOR inhibitor use for the management of TSC manifestations (but not specific to cutaneous manifestations) were included in the analysis because they could improve the skin condition [7, 8]. The patient- or caregiver-reported effectiveness of topical rapamycin and improvement of cutaneous condition with topical and oral mTOR inhibitors were analyzed.

Statistical analysis

Counts and frequency were reported for all categorical variables. Statistical analyses for comparisons between groups were performed using chi-square tests or Fisher Exact tests if n values ≤ 5. The p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using R studio version 1.1.383.

Results

Demographics

Of the 418 caregivers and 133 patients with TSC who responded from the United States using the English version of survey, 336 (80.4%) caregivers and 98 (73.7%) patients with TSC reported cutaneous manifestations. 11 (0.03%) caregivers were taking care of 2 individuals and 15 (0.04%) cared for ≥ 3 individuals.

The prevalence of cutaneous manifestations increased with age with the highest in the 27–45 years age group as reported by caregivers and patients (Table 1). Most patients (> 74%) were diagnosed with TSC within 2 years of birth as reported by caregivers while patients reporting for themselves tended to be diagnosed later in life (Table 2).

Table 1.

Patients age at the time of survey as reported by caregivers and patients by the presence of cutaneous manifestations

Parameter Reported by Caregivers Reported by Patients
Cutaneous manifestations Cutaneous manifestations
Presence
N = 336
n (%)
Absence
N = 82
n (%)
Presence
N = 98
n (%)
Absence
N = 35
n (%)
0–23 months 22 (6.5) 18 (22.0)
2–5 years 45 (13.4) 19 (23.2)
6–12 years 60 (17.9) 14 (17.1)
13–17 years 49 (14.6) 12 (14.6) 1 (1.0) 2 (5.7)
18–26 years 70 (20.8) 3 (3.7) 8 (8.2) 5 (14.3)
27–45 years 76 (22.6) 11 (13.4) 54 (55.1) 14 (40.0)
≥ 46 years 16 (4.8) 4 (4.9) 35 (35.7) 14 (40.0)

Data are n (%)

Table 2.

Patients age at the time of TSC diagnosis as reported by caregivers and patients

Parameter Reported by Caregivers Reported by Patients
Cutaneous manifestations Cutaneous manifestations
Presence
N = 336
Absence
N = 82
Presence
N = 98
Absence
N = 35
0–23 months 252 (75.0) 61 (74.4) 20 (20.4) 2 (5.7)
2–5 years 40 (11.9) 13 (15.9) 16 (16.3) 4 (11.4)
6–12 years 23 (6.8) 3 (3.7) 11 (11.2) 4 (11.4)
13–17 years 13 (3.9) 2 (2.4) 10 (10.2) 4 (11.4)
18–26 years 5 (1.5) 1 (1.2) 15 (15.3) 6 (17.1)
27–45 years 2 (0.6) 1 (1.2) 20 (20.4) 11 (31.4)
≥ 46 years 1 (0.3) 1 (1.2) 6 (6.1) 2 (5.7)

Data are n (%)

TSC-related manifestations

The presence of most TSC-related manifestations was significantly higher in patients with cutaneous manifestations as reported by caregivers and patients (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

TSC-related manifestations in patients with cutaneous manifestations versus without cutaneous manifestations as reported by (A) caregivers and (B) patients. #developmental delay/intellectual disability; p < 0.05; **<0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 comparing patients with versus without cutaneous manifestations. TSC, tuberous sclerosis complex

On average, the number of TSC-related manifestations coexisting in a patient was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in patients with cutaneous manifestations than patients without cutaneous manifestations as reported by caregivers (9.6 vs. 5.4) and self-reported by patients (7.9 vs. 3.6). The number of TSC-related manifestations varied widely ranging from 1 to 18 manifestations observed per individual.

Impact on lifestyle

More than half of both caregivers and patients reported a minor, moderate, or major changes to their lifestyle impact of cutaneous manifestations on lifestyle. A sub-analysis showed a higher proportion of caregivers who responded on behalf of patients aged ≥ 13 years (16.6%) vs. < 13 years (3.9%) reported a major change to their lifestyle due to TSC cutaneous manifestations (Fig. 2) while 11.2% of patients self-reported a severe impact on lifestyle (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Impact of cutaneous manifestations associated with TSC on the lifestyle of (A) caregivers and (B) patients. TSC, tuberous sclerosis complex

Treatment approaches

Surgical removal of cutaneous manifestations was reported by 96 (28.6%) caregivers and 60 (61.2%) patients. Despite the lack of FDA-approved topical mTOR inhibitor in the United States at the time of survey, use of compounded topical rapamycin for the management of facial angiofibroma was reported by 105 (31.3%) caregivers and 23 (23.5%) patients with TSC (Fig. 3A). Use of systemic mTOR inhibitors that include oral rapamycin/sirolimus or everolimus was reported by 16.7% and 31.8% caregivers, respectively, and 37.8% and 29.6% patients with TSC, respectively (Fig. 3A). Use of ≥ 1 mTOR inhibitors that includes systemic or topical rapamycin or everolimus was reported by 191 (56.8%) caregivers and 64 (65.3%) patients. A total of 129 (38.4%) caregivers and 18 (18.4%) patients did not report use of topical/oral mTOR inhibitors or physical treatment.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Treatments for the management of facial angiofibroma as reported by caregivers and patients (A) Subgroup analysis of topical rapamycin use by agegroups as reported caregivers (B) and patients (C). TSC, tuberous sclerosis complex

A subgroup analyses by age groups showed that 13–17 years age group, followed by 6–12 years age group had a higher rate of topical rapamycin use as reported by caregivers (Fig. 3B). Self-reports by patients revealed a decreasing trend of topical rapamycin use with age; however, the n values were very low (Fig. 3C).

Overall, a higher proportion of patients using topical rapamycin reported improvement in facial angiofibroma compared with the use of oral rapamycin or everolimus as reported by caregivers (64.8%, 55.4%, and 57.0%, respectively) and patients with TSC (69.6%, 54.1%, and 48.3%, respectively). A statistically significant difference was observed for the comparison of the improvement in facial angiofibroma of topical rapamycin alone versus oral rapamycin or everolimus alone as reported by caregivers (Fig. 4A). Topical rapamycin use for the management of facial angiofibroma was reported to be moderately effective or very effective by 82.9% of caregivers and 73.9% of patients with TSC (Fig. 4B, C).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Improvement in facial angiofibroma after using topical or oral mTOR inhibitors as reported by caregivers and patients (A) and effectiveness of topical rapamycin as reported by caregivers (B) and patients (C). TSC, tuberous sclerosis complex

Discussion

The sub-analysis of the international survey was conducted to characterize TSC cutaneous manifestations and understand the current treatment approaches for the management of facial angiofibroma in the United States. The presence of other TSC manifestations was significantly higher in patients with cutaneous manifestations compared with patients without cutaneous manifestations. In addition, the number of TSC manifestations coexisting in a patient was significantly higher in patients with cutaneous manifestations. Use of topical rapamycin treatment for the management of facial angiofibroma was reported by 31.3% of caregivers and 23.5% of patients with TSC. Improvement in cutaneous manifestations was more frequently reported with topical rapamycin treatment compared with other treatment approaches. The majority of caregivers and patients reported topical rapamycin as moderately effective or very effective.

Facial disfigurement due to angiofibroma can negatively impact the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients and their caregivers, which can lead to negative psychosocial outcomes. Though the neurological and psychiatric symptoms are the most burdensome manifestations of TSC for caregivers, the panelists and participants of Patient-Focused Drug Development (PFDD) meeting sponsored by the TSC Alliance mentioned that facial angiofibromas are often the most visible sign of TSC and may be the first symptom leading to a diagnosis for mildly affected patients [20]. Facial angiofibroma poses physical as well as psychological risks. Due to bleeding of facial angiofibroma, one of the participants recalled being removed from the sports to avoid infection. Participants also mentioned that patients were teased for the bumps on their faces [20].

In a study by Crall et al., the quality of life of patients who were receiving treatment for the management of facial angiofibroma had significantly better HRQoL scores as measured by the Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI; mean 3.8 vs. 9.5, p = 0.001) compared with those who were not receiving treatment [21]. More than half of the caregivers and patients with TSC in our study reported that cutaneous manifestations impact their lifestyle which requires minor, moderate, or severe changes.

Facial angiofibroma requires chronic treatment throughout life, however, current options in the United States are limited, and the clinical outcomes are generally unsatisfactory. Physical removal of cutaneous manifestations is difficult as the lesions involve the entire dermis. Several caregivers and adults with TSC who participated in the PFDD meeting recalled the pain and discomfort of facial angiofibroma removal procedures [20]. One of the participants who was treated by a dermatologist as a child in the late 1970s recalled periodic visits to “try the newest torture therapy to remove the angiofibromas on my nose and cheeks” [20].

Systemic mTOR inhibitors are used to treat multiple manifestations of TSC [2226], however, their use for the treatment of facial angiofibroma specifically would be off label. Systemic exposure to mTOR inhibitors can be associated with serious side effects, most of which are associated with their immunosuppressive action [27]. Treatment with oral mTOR inhibitors was reported by caregivers and patients with TSC, which is likely attributed to the presence of other conditions such as subependymal giant cell astrocytoma, renal angiomyolipoma, pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis, and focal-onset seizures associated with TSC for which use of oral mTOR inhibitors is approved; this use potentially contributes to the improvement of facial angiofibroma [28, 29].

Topical rapamycin was being prescribed as a compounded formulation of cream/ointment at the time of survey [21]. Most responders in this study rated the effectiveness of topical rapamycin as moderately or highly effective. However, due to their compounded production, these treatments can vary widely in dosage (0.03–1.00%), excipients, and cost, posing a huge unmet need for a standardized and accessible product (20, 3031). A few comments on the international drug development survey indicated when specialty pharmacies were not an option, parents would mix oral sirolimus into a topical formulation themselves [20].

Topical sirolimus, a non-invasive treatment option for the treatment of facial angiofibroma is beneficial [918] and further expands treatment access to the broader population of those affected by TSC including individuals with autism and/or developmental delay that cannot utilize laser treatment. In addition, avoiding the use of anesthesia is beneficial as TSC patients are commonly sedated for imaging. Wheless et al. reported low systemic absorption of sirolimus further supporting topical formulation as the safest option compared with oral mTOR inhibitors for treating facial angiofibromas [16]. This is particularly helpful for patients who are on a transplant list or have had a lung or kidney transplantation, as the transplant medications are not required to be adjusted.

Early treatment with sirolimus gel may maintain the skin at near-normal levels in children with TSC, which further emphasizes the unmet need to access the treatment [32].

This major limitation of this analysis is that the international drug survey was designed to understand patient perspectives regarding all TSC-related manifestations, but it was not specific to cutaneous manifestations. This was not designed to collect data prospectively and is biased based on who was notified of the availability of the survey and chose to respond.

Conclusions

The majority of patients represented in this survey were diagnosed with TSC within 0–23 months of age. Patients with cutaneous manifestations were relatively older than the patients without cutaneous manifestations. The presence of other TSC manifestations in patients with cutaneous manifestations were significantly higher compared with patients without cutaneous manifestations. In patients with cutaneous manifestations, a higher frequency of other TSC manifestations was observed, illustrating the importance of accurate diagnosis of cutaneous manifestations by dermatologists and referral to a comprehensive multi-disciplinary TSC Clinic for surveillance and management of TSC manifestations. Use of topical rapamycin for the management of facial angiofibroma was reported by about one-third of the survey responders, despite the lack of an approved topical rapamycin formulation at the time of survey administration. Improvement in facial angiofibroma was more common with topical rapamycin than the other treatment approaches, and most (> 70%) caregivers and patients rated topical rapamycin as moderately effective or very effective. Recently, the FDA approved topical rapamycin 0.2% gel for the treatment of TSC facial angiofibroma.

Acknowledgements

We thank all of the individuals with TSC and caregivers who responded to this survey or have participated in research studies cited in this paper. We also thank Katie Smith at the TSC Alliance and Jo Anne Nakagawa and Calvin Ho, formerly at the TSC Alliance, for their contributions to the design and distribution of the survey. The authors express their sincere gratitude to Richard Mushlin for the data analysis of patients age at the time of survey and at the time of diagnosis.

Author contributions

SR has initiated, developed, and distributed the survey and has collected the original data. SB has been responsible for data cleaning, preparation and conduct of the statistical data analysis and drafted the manuscript. All authors critically discussed, revised the manuscript and approved the final version.

Funding

The survey was initiated and carried out by the TSC Alliance, MD, USA.

Data availability

All data requests should be submitted to the corresponding author for consideration. Access to available anonymized data may be granted following review.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Data were collected anonymously, and no ethics committee approval was sought. Statistical analysis was performed on anonymized survey data.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the contents of this manuscript. SB and EB were employees of Nobelpharma America LLC at the time of study and manuscript development. GR, AP, and SR are employees of TSC Alliance, a non-profit organization which reports revenue from individual donors and corporations including Aeonian, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, BridgeBio, GW Pharma, LivaNova, Lundbeck, Mallinckrodt, MassMutual, Neurelis, Nobelpharma America, Novartis, Ovid, UCB, and Upsher-Smith.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Northrup H, Aronow ME, Bebin EM, Bissler J, Darling TN, de Vries PJ, et al. Updated international tuberous sclerosis complex diagnostic criteria and surveillance and management recommendations. Pediatr Neurol. 2021;123:50–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Osborne JP, Fryer A, Webb D. Epidemiology of tuberous sclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;615:125–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Inoki K, Corradetti MN, Guan KL. Dysregulation of the TSC-mTOR pathway in human disease. Nat Genet. 2005;37(1):19–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schwartz RA, Fernández G, Kotulska K, Jóźwiak S. Tuberous sclerosis complex: advances in diagnosis, genetics, and management. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(2):189–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Portocarrero LKL, Quental KN, Samorano LP, Oliveira ZNP, Rivitti-Machado MCDM. Tuberous sclerosis complex: review based on new diagnostic criteria. Bras Dermatol. 2018;93(3):323–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Salido-Vallejo R, Garnacho-Saucedo G, Moreno-Giménez JC. Current options for the treatment of facial angiofibromas. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105(6):558–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Franz DN, Budde K, Kingswood JC, Belousova E, Sparagana S, de Vries PJ, et al. Effect of everolimus on skin lesions in patients treated for subependymal giant cell Astrocytoma and renal angiomyolipoma: final 4-year results from the randomized EXIST-1 and EXIST-2 studies. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(10):1796–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nathan N, Wang JA, Li S, Cowen EW, Haughey M, Moss J, et al. Improvement of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) skin tumors during long-term treatment with oral sirolimus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(5):802–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Koenig MK, Hebert AA, Roberson J, Samuels J, Slopis J, Woerner A, et al. Topical Rapamycin therapy to alleviate the cutaneous manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically applied Rapamycin. Drugs R D. 2012;12(3):121–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Koenig MK, Bell CS, Hebert AA, Roberson J, Samuels JA, Slopis JM, et al. Efficacy and safety of topical Rapamycin in patients with facial angiofibromas secondary to tuberous sclerosis complex: the TREATMENT randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(7):773–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wataya-Kaneda M, Tanaka M, Nakamura A, Matsumoto S, Katayama I. A topical combination of Rapamycin and tacrolimus for the treatment of angiofibroma due to tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC): a pilot study of nine Japanese patients with TSC of different disease severity. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165(4):912–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wataya-Kaneda M, Tanaka M, Yang L, Yang F, Tsuruta D, Nakamura A, et al. Clinical and histologic analysis of the efficacy of topical Rapamycin therapy against hypomelanotic macules in tuberous sclerosis complex. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(7):722–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wataya-Kaneda M, Nakamura A, Tanaka M, Hayashi M, Matsumoto S, Yamamoto K, et al. Efficacy and safety of topical sirolimus therapy for facial angiofibromas in the tuberous sclerosis complex: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153(1):39–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wataya-Kaneda M, Ohno Y, Fujita Y, Yokozeki H, Niizeki H, Ogai M, et al. Sirolimus gel treatment vs placebo for facial angiofibromas in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(7):781–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wataya-Kaneda M, Nagai H, Ohno Y, Yokozeki H, Fujita Y, Niizeki H, et al. Safety and efficacy of the sirolimus gel for TSC patients with facial skin lesions in a Long-Term, Open-Label, extension, uncontrolled clinical trial. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020;10(4):635–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wheless MC, Takwi AA, Almoazen H, Wheless JW. Long-Term exposure and safety of a novel topical Rapamycin cream for the treatment of facial angiofibromas in tuberous sclerosis complex: results from a Single-Center, Open-Label trial. Child Neurol Open. 2019;6:2329048X19835047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Malissen N, Vergely L, Simon M, Roubertie A, Malinge MC, Bessis D. Long-term treatment of cutaneous manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex with topical 1% sirolimus cream: A prospective study of 25 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77(3):464–e723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Egami A, Takahashi S, Kokubo T, Boggarapu S, Beresford E. Topical sirolimus 0.2% gel for the management of tuberous sclerosis Complex-Related cutaneous manifestations: an interim analysis of postmarketing surveillance in Japan. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023;13(5):1113–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boggarapu S, Roberds SL, Nakagawa J, Beresford E. Characterization and management of facial angiofibroma related to tuberous sclerosis complex in the united States: retrospective analysis of the natural history database. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17(1):355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ho CN, Rushing G, Valentine JE, Rosbeck KL, Roberds S. The Voice of the Patient. A Report from the Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance’s Externally-Led Patient-Focused Drug Development Meeting. 2017 [5/31/2022]. https://www.tscalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Voice-of-the-Patient-Tuberous-Sclerosis-Alliance.pdf. Accessed 7 Jan 2025.
  • 21.Crall C, Valle M, Kapur K, Dies KA, Liang MG, Sahin M, et al. Effect of angiofibromas on quality of life and access to care in tuberous sclerosis patients and their caregivers. Pediatr Dermatol. 2016;33(5):518–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Franz DN, Belousova E, Sparagana S, Bebin EM, Frost M, Kuperman R, et al. Efficacy and safety of everolimus for subependymal giant cell Astrocytomas associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (EXIST-1): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9861):125–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bissler JJ, Kingswood JC, Radzikowska E, Zonnenberg BA, Frost M, Belousova E, et al. Everolimus for Angiomyolipoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex or sporadic Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (EXIST-2): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9869):817–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.French JA, Lawson JA, Yapici Z, Ikeda H, Polster T, Nabbout R, et al. Adjunctive everolimus therapy for treatment-resistant focal-onset seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis (EXIST-3): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2016;388(10056):2153–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McCormack FX, Inoue Y, Moss J, Singer LG, Strange C, Nakata K, et al. Efficacy and safety of sirolimus in Lymphangioleiomyomatosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(17):1595–606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.FDA approves everolimus. for tuberous sclerosis complex-associated partial-onset seizures. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-everolimus-tuberous-sclerosis-complex-associated-partial-onset-seizures [17th Jan 2021]. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 27.Palavra F, Robalo C, Reis F. Recent advances and challenges of mTOR inhibitors use in the treatment of patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:9820181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hofbauer GF, Marcollo-Pini A, Corsenca A, Kistler AD, French LE, Wüthrich RP, et al. The mTOR inhibitor Rapamycin significantly improves facial angiofibroma lesions in a patient with tuberous sclerosis. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159(2):473–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wei CC, Hsiao YP, Gau SY, Wu YT, Wu CT, Wu MH, et al. The efficacy of everolimus for facial angiofibromas in tuberous sclerosis complex patients treated for renal Angiomyolipoma/Subependymal giant cell Astrocytoma. Dermatology. 2021;237:444–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jóźwiak S, Sadowski K, Kotulska K, Schwartz RA. Topical use of mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors in tuberous sclerosis Complex-A comprehensive review of the literature. Pediatr Neurol. 2016;61:21–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Leducq S, Giraudeau B, Tavernier E, Maruani A. Topical use of mammalian target of Rapamycin inhibitors in dermatology: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(3):735–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Okanishi T, Fujimoto A, Enoki H, Ogai M. Early sirolimus gel treatment May diminish angiofibromas and prevent angiofibroma recurrence in children with tuberous sclerosis complex. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data requests should be submitted to the corresponding author for consideration. Access to available anonymized data may be granted following review.


Articles from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES