Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 Aug 27;24(5):145. doi: 10.1007/s12311-025-01897-w

Identification of a Novel GRM1 Frameshift Variant in Two Pakistani Families Broadens the Genetic Landscape of Ultra-Rare Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 13

Riaz Ahmad 1,2, Mina Zamani 2, Eleanor Self 2, Salah Ud Din Shah 3, Muhammad Naeem 1,, Henry Houlden 2,
PMCID: PMC12380963  PMID: 40858856

Abstract

Autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 13 (SCAR13) is an extremely rare neurodegenerative disorder characterized by psychomotor delay, ranging from mild to severe intellectual disability with absent or poor speech development, nystagmus and stance ataxia. If ambulation is achieved, affected subjects often exhibit gait ataxia. Additionally, epilepsy and polyneuropathy have been reported in some patients. SCAR13 is caused by pathogenic variants in the GRM1 gene, which is predominantly expressed in the cerebellum, with lower levels in the other parts of the brain. To date, only seven reports of this rare ataxia have been published globally. Our study aimed to investigate clinical and mutation spectrum of GRM1-associated SCAR13 disorder in nine patients of two consanguineous Pakistani families (designated here to as NP35 and NP36). We performed whole exome sequencing in the probands of the two families followed by Sanger sequencing to test variant segregation. We identified a novel GRM1 frameshift variant (NM_001278064.2):c.3525_3529del; p.(Asn1176IlefsTer71) in both families as a cause of SCAR13. It was classified as a variant of uncertain significance (PM2: pathogenic moderate 2 and PVS1: pathogenic very strong 1) according to the ACMG guidelines. The novel variant exhibited clinical heterogeneity in the two families. Moreover, scoliosis was observed in all four patients of the family NP35, a feature previously documented in only one patient worldwide. Our study expands the limited mutation spectrum of the GRM1-associated SCAR13. Next-generation sequencing plays a pivotal role in the elucidation of inherited neurological disorders and in a better understanding of the convergent phenotypes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12311-025-01897-w.

Keywords: Neurodegenerative disorders, Intellectual disability, Whole exome sequencing, Glutamate metabotropic receptor 1, Clinical heterogeneity

Introduction

Autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 13 (SCAR13; MIM 614831) is an ultra-rare disorder caused by pathogenic or disruptive mutations in the GRM1 gene, located on chromosome 6q24.3 [31]. GRM1 encodes the metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) protein, which is a G-protein coupled receptor and plays a role in neuronal excitability, synaptic plasticity, and feedback inhibition of neurotransmitter release. SCAR13 is a neurological condition characterized by delayed psychomotor and abnormal intellectual development starting in infancy. Other features include poor or absent speech, hyperreflexia, as well as gait and stance ataxia. Most subjects also exhibit abnormalities in eye movements [16]. In 2012, Guergueltcheva et al. first reported the GRM1 gene associated with SCAR13 by two biallelic variants in five Roma families, and later in 2015, Davarniya et al. reported a second novel biallelic variant in a single Iranian family. All these patients had intellectual disability and cerebellar ataxia.

So far, only seven reports of the GRM1 gene variants associated with SCAR13 have been published, as summarized in Table 1. SCAR13 (MIM:614,831) associated GRM1 variants are null variants, leading to the loss of mGluR1 function [28]. These reported variants included three missense, two nonsense, two deletions, and one splice site variant [10, 23, 24]. Pathogenic variants in GRM1 are also linked to autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia 44 (SCA44; MIM: 617691), which is less severe than SCAR13 phenotype [29].

Table 1.

A comparison of clinical manifestations of SCAR13 patients with GRM1 (NM_001278064.2) variants as reported in the literature

Features [16] [10] [7] 24 [31] [23] [8] Present Study (Family NP-35 & NP-36)
No of Patients Reported 10 3 1 3 3 1 1 9
MAF NA NA

exomes: ƒ = 0.000000684

genomes: not found

exomes: ƒ = 0.000000684

genomes: ƒ = 0.00000657

NA NA NA NA
cDNA Variant c.2652_2654del and c.26660 +  2 T > G c.1360C > T c.889C > T c.718G > A c.718G > T c.2471C > G c.1258_1297del and c.2368_2369del c.3525_3529del p.(Asn1176IlefsTer71)
Zygosity Homozygous Homozygous Homozygous Homozygous Homozygous Homozygous Compound Heterozygous Homozygous
Variant Type Deletion/Splice site Missense Nonsense Missense Nonsense Missense Deletion Deletion
Onset Early Early Early Early Early Early Late Early
Developmental Delay  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   + 
Intellectual Disability  + (Intellectual disability)  + (Moderate to severe)  + (Severe/global)  + (Moderate to severe)  + (Severe) -  +   + 
Speech Impairment  +   +   +   +   +  NA  +   + 
Cerebellar Atrophy/Hypoplasia  +   +   +  -  +   +  -  + 
Gait/Stance Ataxia Gait/stance ataxia Gait/stance ataxia No walking Gait ataxia Quadrupedal gait Gait/stance ataxia No independent walking No independent walking
Dysarthria  +  - - -  +   +  -  + 
Seizures -  +  - - - - - Dystonic tremors and seizures (in NP35) and Mild involuntary movement (frequent falls)
Nystagmus -  +   +  - - -  + (Mild) Nystagmus in family NP35
Pyramidal Signs  + (Mild) -  +  -  +  - -  + 
Scoliosis - - - -  +  - -  + (NP-35)
Behavioral Issues -  + (Aggressive) -  + (Aggressive)  + (Aggressive) - - NA
Other Features Inferior vermian hypoplasia, dysdiadochokinesi,dysmetria Esotropia (in one patient), short stature Autism spectrum disorder, axial hypotonia, joint hyperlaxity Spasticity, eye abnormalities, dental and skeletal anomalies, ear shape anomalies Peripheral neuropathy, eye ptosis, strabismus, pes planus, non-progressive Coarse discoordination when performing dynamic hand tests Balance disturbance, diffuse hypotonia, mild dysphagia Balance disturbance

GRM1 is mainly expressed in the cerebellum [18, 19, 23] but is also present in the spinal cord, cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, medulla oblongata, bone marrow, heart and kidney [31]. It is highly expressed in cerebellar Purkinje cells [21], localized at postsynaptic densities and functions by activating phospholipase C, leading to the formation of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate/diacylglycerol [11, 14, 30]. Through the activation of second messenger systems, GRM1 plays a crucial role in cognition, cerebellar development and neuroprotection, thereby maintaining synaptic plasticity [3].

According to [6], GRM1 gene contains eight exons making mGluR1 monomer composed of extracellular region, including venus flytrap domain (VFTD) and cysteine-rich domain (CRD). Two other domains are 7 transmembrane domains (TM1-TM7) and C-terminal region (CTD). C-terminal domain varies in alpha and beta isoforms of mGluR1 [23]. VFTD [7, 10, 16, 24, 31] and TM7 domains [16] are the most frequently mutated regions associated with SCAR13. So far, mutation in C-terminal domain is not reported in the literature for SCAR13 while documented by Watson et al. [29] for SCA44 disorder.

In the present study, we investigated nine patients from two unrelated Pakistani families affected with diverse manifestations of SCAR13. This study broadens and strengthens our understanding of the genetic defects in the GRM1 gene, which underlie a variety of clinical symptoms. According to our recent systematic analysis [1], 90% of the reported cases of neurological disorders in the Pakistani population are attributed to consanguineous marriages, as diagnosed through whole exome sequencing (WES). Both families included in this report originate from the same ethnic and geographic region, where the consanguinity rate is so high. Therefore, it may increase the likelihood of rare founder mutations being shared across ostensibly unrelated families.

Material and Methods

Human Subjects and Ethical Approval

Our study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad. All experiments were undertaken with the understanding and written consent of each subject. The study conforms with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Human families (labelled as NP35 and NP36) included in this research study belong to the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. Saliva and peripheral blood samples were collected for genomic DNA isolation by using Oragene saliva collection kit (Cat# OG500, DNA Genotek Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada) and Qiagen DNA extraction kit (Cat# 56,304, QIAamp, Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), respectively. Extracted DNA was further quantified through Quantus Fluorometer (Cat# E6150, Promega, Madison, WI, USA).

Genetic Screening

Next-Generation Sequencing

To identify the disease-causing variants, whole exome sequencing was carried out at Macrogen Inc., Korea, through the Agilent SureSelect Human All Exome V6 Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) as described previously [12]. The paired-end sequencing (PE150) was performed by the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The obtained sequencing reads were aligned against the human reference genome (hg19 reference genome assembly) through BWA (Burrows-Wheeler Aligner v0.7.17: http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net/bwa.shtml). For the recruited families, the hg19 reference genome assembly was selected, while the hg38 assembly was used against sequencing reads. The BAM files were sorted and the duplicate reads were marked through Samtools (v1.8) (https://github.com/samtools/samtools/releases/tag/1.8) and Picard (v2.18.9) (http://sourceforge.net/projects/picard/), respectively. For genotyping, Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK: https://gatk.broadinstitute.org) v4.0 was used. For functional annotation, Annotate Variation (ANNOVAR: https://annovar.openbioinformatics.org/en/latest/) was performed, while for variant filtration, FILTUS (http://folk.uio.no/magnusv/filtus.html) was used as described earlier [2]. After proper annotation, the generated file was recovered in the CSV format that was further filtered to identify the possible pathogenic variants.

Our strategy for bioinformatic filtration consisted of screening for exonic sequences and splice acceptor/donor splice sites (Figure S1). According to the phenotypes and pedigrees, we prioritized the rare variants having minor allelic frequency < 0.01% in public databases such as The Genome Aggregation Database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/), 1000 Genomes Project (https://www.internationalgenome.org/), NHLBI Exome Variant Server (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/) and Complete Genomics 69 (https://www.completegenomics.com/). Secondly, the pattern of inheritance (such as homozygous, and compound heterozygous) and phenotypes (including neuropathy, disability and other neurological disorders) were considered during filtration. Thirdly, the pathogenic impact was considered especially for nonsense, missense, splice site and frameshift variants. Different in silico tools were used for deleterious effects, including CADD score greater than 17, SIFT and Polyphen 2. Furthermore, pathogenicity of the variants was assessed based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines.

Sanger Sequencing and Runs of Homozygosity (ROHs)

Primer3Web (version 4.1.0) tool (https://primer3.ut.ee/) was used as described previously [5] for primer designing and the target sequence relevant to the candidate gene variant was amplified through PCR. A pair of forward primer (AACTGACCCCGGATGATTCG) and reverse primer (GTGGGAGATCTCTGGCTTGT) was used for PCR amplification under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 96 °C for 8 min, followed by denaturation at 94 °C for 35 s, annealing at 62 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 45 s. Final PCR products were purified through a kit-based method (GenJet PCR Purification Kit, Thermo Scientific USA). The specific products were assessed via a 2% agarose gel, alongside a 100-base pair ladder (Thermo Scientific USA). Using a standard protocol, the candidate gene (GRM1) variant was tested for co-segregation with the disease phenotype using Sanger sequencing (ABI3730 DNA Analyzer). The results provided by the ABI3730 DNA Analyzer were visualized and analyzed with BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor version 7.2.6. For homozygosity mapping, an online tool named AutoMap (https://automap.iob.ch/process) was used with default settings, which needed a VCF file generated by whole exome sequencing to show the homozygous regions (Fig. 1B and Fig. 2B).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(A) Pedigree of family NP35. (B) Runs of homozygosity regions. (C) Clinical presentation of the patient. (D) Electropherograms representing segregation of identified variant in the family

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(A) Pedigree of family NP36. (B) Runs of homozygosity regions. (C) Clinical presentation of the patient. (D) Electropherograms representing segregation of identified variant in the family

Results

We identified a novel GRM1 variant (NM_001278064.2):c.3525_3529del in both families. This variant predicts a frameshift causing the substitution of asparagine at position p.1176 with isoleucine, followed by a premature stop codon 71 amino acids downstream [p.(Asn1176IlefsTer71)] and a truncated protein.

Clinical Reports

Table 1 summarizes the most consistent clinical findings of all affected individuals of the two families (NP35 and NP36). The pedigrees of the families and clinical photographs of the affected individuals are presented in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. In both families, the identified variant was found segregated in an autosomal recessive pattern (Fig. 1D and Fig. 2D).

A five-generation consanguineous family (NP35) was comprised of four affected individuals (V:1, V:2, V:4 and V:5) and one healthy individual (V:3) who were born after a normal pregnancy (Fig. 1A). Parents of the affected family were healthy/asymptomatic. Clinical symptoms were observed in infancy in all affected subjects, like feeding difficulties and developmental delay. Karyotyping analysis was normal for the subject (V:1) at the age of one year. Multiple biochemical tests gave normal results as confirmed by recent clinical evaluation. In the affected individuals, the common clinical features were psychomotor deficits, lack of ambulation, motor dysfunction, severe intellectual disability, jerky and roving eye movements, inability to eat, severe speech delay, frequent falls and dystonic tremors. Interestingly, subjects other than V:1 exhibited severe repetitive jerks or seizures. The clinical manifestations closely matched with SCAR13 phenotype (OMIM: 614,831).

A four-generation consanguineous family (NP36) was affected with SCAR13 in an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance, with five affected individuals who presented disease onset at the age of 1–2 years of life (Fig. 2A). Clinical history in all affected individuals of the family was consistent. The proband (IV:1) presented with severe intellectual disability, dysmetria, involuntary movements, speech delay, gait ataxia and frequent falls. No hearing or cognitive impairment was observed in this family. The affected individual IV:3 had a normal chromosomal karyotype, and several other laboratory parameters, like complete blood counts, liver function test, and serum electrolytes, were also normal. Based on clinical and physical examinations, it was suggested a case of SCAR13.

The phenotypes of both families overlapped, but the family NP35 was uniquely severe in terms of clinical manifestations such as seizures, developmental delay and jerky and roving eye movements.

Discussion

We investigated nine SCAR13 patients from two families, and identified a novel pathogenic GRM1 frameshift variant c.3525_3529; p.(Asn1176IlefsTer71) in C-terminal domain (CTD) of mGluR1 (alpha isoform), segregating in an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance. Variants in CTD of mGluR1 are not previously reported in SCAR13 cases, however, a de novo heterozygous frameshift variant p.Gly1056Argfs*49 in CTD was found in the proband of a family affected with autosomal dominant SCA44. This variant exhibited a dominant-negative effect associated with juvenile-onset ataxia and intellectual disability [29].

The variant c.3525_3529; p.(Asn1176IlefsTer71) is present in the last exon of GRM1 that may be predicted to escape nonsense mediated decay and would result in the production of a truncated mGluR1 in consistence with previous report [29] that of C-terminal GRM1 variant. The truncation may exert dominant negative effects via dimerizing with wild type mGluR1, disrupting synaptic transmission. Alternatively, it could mislocalize to the cytoplasm, disrupting cerebellar circuit formation. In murine models having CTD deletions exhibit ataxia and synaptic defects [22], mirroring SCAR13 phenotypes.

Our identified variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) according to the ACMG guidelines. Uniquely, the same variant led to more severe clinical manifestations in the patients of family NP35 than those of family NP36, as mentioned in Table 2 (video is available upon request). So, this study presents a novel variant with interfamilial clinical heterogeneity suggesting the involvement of additional molecular modifiers and a more complex genotype–phenotype correlation.

Table 2.

Comparison of clinical presentation of two families affected with SCAR13 included in this study

Feature Family NP35 Family NP36
Patient IDs V:1, V:2, V:4, V:5 IV:1, IV:3, IV:4, IV:5, IV:6
Gender 3 Male, 1 Female 4 Male, 1 Female
Current Age 6 to 22 years 5 to 10 years
Onset Age 1 year 1–2 years
OMIM Syndrome OMIM: 614831 OMIM: 614831
Developmental delay Yes, Severe Mild to moderate
Motor Function Inability to stand or walk Inability to stand, gait ataxia
Oculomotor Symptoms Severe nystagmus, jerky and roving eye movements No
Eye ptosis Yes No
Speech impairment Yes, Severe Yes, Moderate
Intellectual Disability Yes, Severe Mild to moderate
Feeding difficulty Yes Yes
Other Neurological Signs Dystonic tremors, epilepsy, frequent falls (V:2, V:4, V:5) Mild involuntary movement, frequent falls
Pyramidal Signs Yes Yes
Microcephaly Mildly observed No
Scoliosis Yes No
Facial dysmorphism Mild to moderate No
Brain MRI NA NA

Clinical features of the affected individuals within each family were not completely identical but most of their features were consistent

We reviewed 22 reported patients affected with GRM1-associated SCAR13 disorder as summarized in Table 1 [7, 8, 10, 16, 23, 24, 31]. Among these documented SCAR13 patients (n = 22), 13 (59%) were observed with oculomotor abnormalities (strabismus). Severe intellectual disability was observed in 16 (73%) patients while speech impairment was found in 14 (64%) patients who were nonverbal. Clinical manifestations of walking inability, horizontal gaze-evoked nystagmus, and pyramidal signs each were assessed in 15 cases and recognized in 9 (60%), 5 (33%) and 15 (100%) patients, respectively. Presence of seizures was evaluated in 18 cases and found in 8 (44%) patients (Fig. 3). Most clinical symptoms of our investigated families overlap with those described by Guergueltcheva et al. [16], Davarniya et al. [10] and Yousaf et al. [31] (Table 1). Scoliosis has been previously reported in a single patient only [31]. In our family NP35, all four affected individuals exhibited scoliosis, while it was absent in the patients of family NP36.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Bar chart illustrating clinical features in the previously reported cases of SCAR13 (n-22)

Disease severity in SCAR13 is considered a function of the type of variant in the patients. In the two published reports, the frameshift variant led to truncation of the receptor protein that was considered responsible for severe phenotypes in the affected individuals [7, 16]. However, both of our families were identified with the same frameshift variant presenting interfamilial clinical heterogeneity,family NP35 had severe phenotype than the family NP36. Our study indicates that the variation in the clinical manifestations and severity involves the presence of modifier genes in addition to the type of mutations. Investigations are recommended to further elucidate the molecular basis of SCAR13 including the potential modifier genes.

Other than spinocerebellar ataxia, there are published data on the GRM1 variants associated with increased risk of autism, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [4, 9, 13, 15, 26, 27]. This pleiotropy underscores the mGluR1 role in synaptic plasticity and neurodevelopment with tissue-specific isoforms. However, in our families, symptoms associated with these disorders were not observed.

Our investigation led to expand the number of SCAR13 cases from 22 to 31 in the literature and reported a novel GRM1 variant with clinical heterogeneity. Furthermore, this is the first report of SCAR13 case with a variant in mGluR1 C-terminal domain. This study reinforces the evidence of disrupted mGluR1 signalling in cerebellar dysfunction leading to early onset of SCAR13. Moreover, features like scoliosis and epilepsy are rarely observed in SCAR13 and should be considered in future clinical and research studies.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1 (123.9KB, png)

Filtration criteria applied in the current study for variant detection in the exome sequencing (PNG 123 KB)

Authors Contributions

Conceptualization: RA, MN, HH. Methodology: RA, MZ, ES and SS. Supervision and Resources: MN, HH. Writing original draft: RA. Writing—review & editing: MN. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

Riaz Ahmad was supported by Higher Education Commission of Pakistan through IRSIP Fellowship (IRSIP 52 BMS 22).

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from the enrolled family to participate in the study.

Consent to Publish

Informed consent was obtained from the enrolled families to allow publication of the clinical and diagnostic information collected in the study.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Muhammad Naeem, Email: mnaeem@qau.edu.pk.

Henry Houlden, Email: h.houlden@ucl.ac.uk.

References

  • 1.Ahmad R, Naeem M. A systematic review of hereditary neurological disorders diagnosed by whole exome sequencing in Pakistani population: updates from 2014 to November 2024. Neurogenetics. 2025;26(1):1–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ahmad R, Sayyad F, Naeem M, Houlden H. Report of a novel missense TDP1 variant in a Pakistani family affected with an extremely rare disorder congenital spinocerebellar ataxia with axonal neuropathy type 1 (SCAN1). Mol Biol Rep. 2025;52(1):7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alba A, Kano M, Chen C, Stanton ME, Fox GD, Herrup K, Zwingman TA, Tonegawa S. Deficient cerebellar long-term depression and impaired motor learning in mGluR1 mutant mice. Cell. 1994;79(2):377–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ayoub MA, Angelicheva D, Vile D, Chandler D, Morar B, Cavanaugh JA, Visscher PM, Jablensky A, Pfleger KD, Kalaydjieva L. Deleterious GRM1 mutations in schizophrenia. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e32849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bibi H, Ahmad R, Rahman F, Maqbool S, Naeem M, Efthymiou S, Houlden H. Molecular and computational analysis of a novel pathogenic variant in emopamil-binding protein (EBP) involved in cholesterol biosynthetic pathway causing a rare male EBP disorder with neurologic defects (MEND syndrome). Mol Biol Rep. 2025;52(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bjarnadóttir TK, Fredriksson R, Schiöth HB. The gene repertoire and the common evolutionary history of glutamate, pheromone (V2R), taste (1) and other related G protein-coupled receptors. Gene. 2005;362:70–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cabet S, Putoux A, Carneiro M, Labalme A, Sanlaville D, Guibaud L, Lesca G. A novel truncating variant p. (Arg297*) in the GRM1 gene causing autosomal-recessive cerebellar ataxia with juvenile-onset. Eur J Med Genet. 2019;62(10):103726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cesaroni CA, Pisanò G, Trimarchi G, Caraffi SG, Scandolo G, Gnazzo M, Frattini D, Spagnoli C, Rizzi S, Dittadi C, Sigona G. Severe neurodevelopmental disorder in autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 13 (SCAR13) caused by two novel frameshift variants in GRM1. Cerebellum. 2024;23(5):1768–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cho HP, Garcia-Barrantes PM, Brogan JT, Hopkins CR, Niswender CM, Rodriguez AL, Venable DF, Morrison RD, Bubser M, Daniels JS, Jones CK, Conn PJ, Lindsley CW. Chemical modulation of mutant mGlu1 receptors derived from deleterious GRM1 mutations found in schizophrenics. ACS Chem Biol. 2014;9(10):2334–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Davarniya B, Hu H, Kahrizi K, Musante L, Fattahi Z, Hosseini M, Maqsoud F, Farajollahi R, Wienker TF, Ropers HH, Najmabadi H. The role of a novel TRMT1 gene mutation and rare GRM1 gene defect in intellectual disability in two Azeri families. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0129631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Desai MA, Burnett JP, Mayne NG, Schoepp DD. Cloning and expression of a human metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 alpha: enhanced coupling on co-transfection with a glutamate transporter. Mol Pharmacol. 1995;48(4):648–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Efthymiou S, Salpietro V, Malintan N, Poncelet M, Kriouile Y, Fortuna S, De Zorzi R, Payne K, Henderson LB, Cortese A, Maddirevula S. Biallelic mutations in neurofascin cause neurodevelopmental impairment and peripheral demyelination. Brain. 2019;142(10):2948–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Elia J, Glessner JT, Wang K, Takahashi N, Shtir CJ, Hadley D, Sleiman PMA, Zhang H, Kim CE, Robison R, Lyon GJ, Flory JH, Bradfield JP, Imielinski M, Hou C, Frackelton EC, Chiavacci RM, Sakurai T, Rabin C, Middleton FA, Thomas KA, Garris M, Mentch F, Freitag CM, Steinhausen H-C, Todorov AA, Reif A, Rothenberger A, Franke B, Mick EO, Roeyers H, Buitelaar J, Lesch K-P, Banaschewski T, Ebstein RP, Mulas F, Oades RD, Sergeant J, Sonuga-Barke E, Renner TJ, Romanos M, Romanos J, Warnke A, Walitza S, Meyer J, Pálmason H, Seitz C, Loo SK, Smalley SL, Biederman J, Kent L, Asherson P, Anney RJL, Gaynor JW, Shaw P, Devoto M, White PS, Grant SFA, Buxbaum JD, Rapoport JL, Williams NM, Nelson SF, Faraone SV, Hakonarson H. Genome-wide copy number variation study associates metabotropic glutamate receptor gene networks with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Nat Genet. 2012;44(1):78–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Enz R. Structure of metabotropic glutamate receptor C-terminal domains in contact with interacting proteins. Front Mol Neurosci. 2012;5:52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Frank RA, McRae AF, Pocklington AJ, van de Lagemaat LN, Navarro P, Croning MD, Komiyama NH, Bradley SJ, Challiss RA, Armstrong JD, Finn RD, Malloy MP, MacLean AW, Harris SE, Starr JM, Bhaskar SS, Howard EK, Hunt SE, Coffey AJ, Ranganath V, Deloukas P, Rogers J, Muir WJ, Deary IJ, Blackwood DH, Visscher PM, Grant SG. Clustered coding variants in the glutamate receptor complexes of individuals with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(4):e19011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guergueltcheva V, Azmanov DN, Angelicheva D, Smith KR, Chamova T, Florez L, Azmanov D, Smith K, Bynevelt M, Nguyen T, Cherninkova S, Bojinova V, Kaprelyan A, Angelova L, Morar B, Chandler D, Kaneva R, Bahlo M, Tournev I, Kalaydjieva L. Autosomal-recessive congenital cerebellar ataxia is caused by mutations in metabotropic glutamate receptor 1. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;91(3):553–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hamamy H, Antonarakis SE, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Temtamy S, Romeo G, Ten Kate LP, Bennett RL, Shaw A, Megarbane A, Van Duijn C, Bathija H. Consanguineous marriages, pearls and perils: Geneva international consanguinity workshop report. Genet Med. 2011;13(9):841–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kapushesky M, Emam I, Holloway E, Kurnosov P, Zorin A, Malone J, Rustici G, Williams E, Parkinson H, Brazma A. Gene expression atlas at the European bioinformatics institute. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(suppl_1):D690–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lindsay SJ, Xu Y, Lisgo SN, Harkin LF, Copp AJ, Gerrelli D, Clowry GJ, Talbot A, Keogh MJ, Coxhead J, Santibanez-Koref M, Chinnery PF. HDBR expression: a unique resource for global and individual gene expression studies during early human brain development. Front Neuroanat. 2016;10:86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nguengang Wakap S, Lambert DM, Olry A, Rodwell C, Gueydan C, Lanneau V, Murphy D, Le Cam Y, Rath A. Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28(2):165–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nicoletti F, Bockaert J, Collingridge GL, Conn PJ, Ferraguti F, Schoepp DD, Wroblewski JT, Pin JP. Metabotropic glutamate receptors: from the workbench to the bedside. Neuropharmacology. 2011;60(7–8):1017–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ohtani Y, Miyata M, Hashimoto K, Tabata T, Kishimoto Y, Fukaya M, Kase D, Kassai H, Nakao K, Hirata T, Watanabe M. The synaptic targeting of mGluR1 by its carboxyl-terminal domain is crucial for cerebellar function. J Neurosci. 2014;34(7):2702–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Protasova MS, Andreeva TV, Klyushnikov SA, Illarioshkin SN, Rogaev EI. Genetic variant in GRM1 underlies congenital cerebellar ataxia with no obvious intellectual disability. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(2):1551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rasool IG, Zahoor MY, Iqbal M, Anjum AA, Ashraf F, Abbas HQ, Baig HMA, Mahmood T, Shehzad W. Whole exome sequencing revealed novel variants in consanguineous Pakistani families with intellectual disability. Genes Genomics. 2021;43:503–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ross JP, Dion PA, Rouleau GA. Exome sequencing in genetic disease: recent advances and considerations. F1000Res. 2020;9: F1000-Faculty. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Waltes R, Duketis E, Knapp M, Anney RJ, Huguet G, Schlitt S, Jarczok TA, Sachse M, Kämpfer LM, Kleinböck T, Poustka F, Bölte S, Schmötzer G, Voran A, Huy E, Meyer J, Bourgeron T, Klauck SM, Freitag CM, Chiocchetti AG. Common variants in genes of the postsynaptic FMRP signalling pathway are risk factors for autism spectrum disorders. Hum Genet. 2014;133:781–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Waltes R, Duketis E, Knapp M, Anney RJ, Huguet G, Schlitt S, Jarczok TA, Sachse M, Kämpfer LM, Kleinböck T, Poustka F. Common variants in genes of the postsynaptic FMRP signalling pathway are risk factors for autism spectrum disorders. Hum Genet. 2014;133:781–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang Y, Muraleetharan A, Langiu M, Gregory KJ, Hellyer SD. SCA44-and SCAR13-associated GRM1 mutations affect metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 function through distinct mechanisms. Br J Pharmacol. 2024;181(22):4514–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Watson LM, Bamber E, Schnekenberg RP, Williams J, Bettencourt C, Lickiss J, Jayawant S, Fawcett K, Clokie S, Wallis Y, Clouston P. Dominant mutations in GRM1 cause spinocerebellar ataxia type 44. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;101(3):451–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wu H, Wang C, Gregory KJ, Han GW, Cho HP, Xia Y, Niswender CM, Katritch V, Meiler J, Cherezov V, Conn PJ, Stevens RC. Structure of a class C GPCR metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 bound to an allosteric modulator. Science. 2014;344(6179):58–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yousaf H, Fatima A, Ali Z, Baig SM, Toft M, Iqbal Z. A novel nonsense variant in GRM1 causes autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 13 in a consanguineous Pakistani family. Genes. 2022;13(9):1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESM 1 (123.9KB, png)

Filtration criteria applied in the current study for variant detection in the exome sequencing (PNG 123 KB)

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Cerebellum (London, England) are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES