Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2002 Apr;68(4):1743–1753. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.4.1743-1753.2002

Profiles of Airborne Fungi in Buildings and Outdoor Environments in the United States

Brian G Shelton 1,*, Kimberly H Kirkland 1, W Dana Flanders 2, George K Morris 1
PMCID: PMC123871  PMID: 11916692

Abstract

We examined 12,026 fungal air samples (9,619 indoor samples and 2,407 outdoor samples) from 1,717 buildings located across the United States; these samples were collected during indoor air quality investigations performed from 1996 to 1998. For all buildings, both indoor and outdoor air samples were collected with an Andersen N6 sampler. The culturable airborne fungal concentrations in indoor air were lower than those in outdoor air. The fungal levels were highest in the fall and summer and lowest in the winter and spring. Geographically, the highest fungal levels were found in the Southwest, Far West, and Southeast. The most common culturable airborne fungi, both indoors and outdoors and in all seasons and regions, were Cladosporium, Penicillium, nonsporulating fungi, and Aspergillus. Stachybotrys chartarum was identified in the indoor air in 6% of the buildings studied and in the outdoor air of 1% of the buildings studied. This study provides industrial hygienists, allergists, and other public health practitioners with comparative information on common culturable airborne fungi in the United States. This is the largest study of airborne indoor and outdoor fungal species and concentrations conducted with a standardized protocol to date.


Increasingly, fungi in indoor air are being proposed as a cause of adverse health effects (3, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 23). Exposure to fungi has been reported to cause several types of human health problems, primarily irritations, infections, allergies, and toxic effects, and it has been suggested that toxigenic fungi are the cause of additional adverse health effects (7, 9, 10, 13, 14). A field guide published by the American Industrial Hygiene Association recommends that the presence of some toxigenic fungi requires urgent risk management decisions (8). To systematically evaluate the relationship between airborne fungi and adverse health effects, the fungal types and their relative frequencies in both indoor and outdoor air need to be known. Increased understanding of airborne fungal populations should enable better interpretation of fungal exposure found in building air quality investigations.

Information obtained from fungal air samples can assist in medical evaluations, determination of remediation procedures, and assessment of health hazards and can be useful in proactive indoor air quality monitoring. Qualitative and quantitative assessments of fungi in indoor air are valuable; however, there are limitations in interpreting results obtained with bioaerosol samples. For example, there currently are no government or industry standards that specify allowable or acceptable concentrations of indoor airborne fungi. Also, only limited information is available on fungal types and their prevalence in buildings (2, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26). Similarly, there is little published information comparing indoor and outdoor fungal populations or comparing fungal populations in different parts of the United States. Without such comparative data, it is difficult to determine the significance of the quantitative and qualitative results obtained in any particular indoor air quality investigation.

Fungi usually enter a building through outdoor air intakes of the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system, through doors and windows, and as contaminants on building materials and contents. If elevated moisture conditions exist for a sufficient time in a building, fungal growth and sporulation may occur. Outdoor air often is the dominant source of indoor fungi, so an understanding of the outdoor fungal populations in different seasons and in different regions necessarily underlies interpretation of the results of indoor fungal sampling. Although other descriptive studies of indoor and outdoor fungi have described culturable fungal counts determined by using volumetric samplers, these studies usually were limited in terms of the number of study buildings and/or in terms of seasonal or regional effects (2, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26).

The objectives of this study were (i) to describe the types and relative frequencies of both indoor and outdoor airborne fungi for three consecutive years by using samples obtained from different regions of the United States in different seasons of the year and (ii) to compare the species distributions and frequencies in indoor air and outdoor air. By using a standardized protocol for sample collection and analysis, we obtained essential comparative information that can be used by public health professionals as they interpret results of indoor air quality investigations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Air samples.

All samples were submitted by building investigators as part of indoor air quality investigations in the United States from 1996 to 1998. These investigators included industrial hygienists, engineers, environmental health consultants, building managers, and safety personnel. A total of 12,026 samples, including 9,619 indoor samples and 2,407 outdoor samples, from 1,717 buildings were analyzed. At least one outdoor sample was collected for each building. The samples were collected with Andersen N6 samplers (Thermo Andersen, Inc., Atlanta, Ga.) using either Rose Bengal agar (RBA) or malt extract agar (MEA) as the culture medium. RBA (without streptomycin) was prepared using Martin's modification of peptone dextrose agar (20). MEA was prepared by using 25 g of malt extract per liter, 1 g of yeast extract per liter, and 16.5 g of agar per liter. RBA and MEA were used as the sampling media in approximately 99 and 1% of the buildings, respectively.

Questionnaire.

We contacted building investigators for 100 randomly selected buildings from which samples were received in 1998 and asked them to complete a brief telephone questionnaire. The response rate for completed questionnaires was 82%. From the responses we determined the type of building, the primary reason for performing the indoor air quality investigation, and the types of health complaints, if any. The building types included hospital, school, office building, residence, industrial, and other. The options for the primary reason for sampling were odors, health complaints, proactive sampling, visual growth, water damage, and other, and multiple selections were possible. The options for health complaints, if indicated, were eye, throat, cough, shortness of breath, headache, skin, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and other.

Sampling and analysis.

We analyzed fungal air samples collected with Andersen N6 samplers, which are viable impaction samplers. Cultures were incubated in the laboratory at room temperature (23 ± 3°C). Plates were inspected after 4 days and periodically up to 14 days after primary exposure. The concentration of fungi per cubic meter of air was calculated, and the most common genera of fungi present were identified by macroscopic and/or microscopic analysis. Our analytical criterion was to identify the 10 most common fungal types if many types were present. However, for the vast majority of samples all fungal types present were identified. All fungal concentrations were expressed as CFU per cubic meter of air. Actual plate counts, not estimated counts, were used to calculate the CFU per cubic meter (1). The detection limit of the sampling procedure was typically 12 CFU/m3, but it occasionally varied depending on the volume of air collected during sampling. The concentrations for samples in which there was no growth (the concentrations were below the detection limits) were arbitrarily defined as 1 CFU/m3 for the purposes of analysis. Most fungi were identified to the genus level; the exceptions were Aspergillus and Stachybotrys isolates, which were identified to the species level. Fungi that failed to sporulate after 12 to 14 days were recorded as nonsporulating.

Fungal concentrations and statistical analysis.

Indoor and outdoor samples for each building were analyzed separately using descriptive statistics, such as median, mean, and 25th, 75th, and 95th percentiles. Qualitative and quantitative results were compared by year, region, season, and indoor air versus outdoor air. Seasons were defined as winter (December, January, February), spring (March, April, May), summer (June, July, August), and fall (September, October, November). Regions were defined as Far West, Midwest, Northeast, Northwest, Southeast, and Southwest (Fig. 1). Analyses in which indoor air versus outdoor air, region, and season were examined were performed by using the percentages of samples positive for specific fungal types. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine if there were statistically significant differences between yearly, seasonal, and regional fungal concentrations for both indoor air and outdoor air. To compare the presence of fungal type on the basis of reported reason for sample submission, we calculated odds ratios and Fisher exact two-tailed P values. The odds ratios were calculated to compare the frequency of detection in buildings for which the stated reason for submission was health with the frequency of detection in buildings for which the stated reason for submission was proactive.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Regions of the United States in which air samples were collected. n, number of buildings studied.

RESULTS

Overall concentrations.

The median indoor fungal concentration was approximately 80 CFU/m3, and the values ranged from below the limit of detection to more than 10,000 CFU/m3 (Table 1). The median outdoor fungal concentration was approximately 500 CFU/m3, and the range was similar. Ninety-five percent of the buildings tested had a median indoor fungal concentration of less than 1,300 CFU/m3, and 95% had a median outdoor fungal concentration of less than 3,200 CFU/m3. We calculated the ratio of the median indoor concentration for each building to the corresponding median outdoor concentration. The ratio was 1:1 or lower for 85% of the buildings, 2.8 or lower for 95% of the buildings, and 0.16 or lower for 50% of the buildings (Table 1). Indoor fungal concentrations (mean and median) correlated with the corresponding outdoor fungal concentrations with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.43 (P < 0.001).

TABLE 1.

Median fungal concentrations and median indoor/outdoor fungal ratios

Parameter Concn (CFU/m3)a
Indoor/outdoor ratio for all buildingsb (n = 1,717)
Outdoor (n = 1,717) Indoor (n = 1,717)
Minimum (0%) 1 1 0.00027
25th percentile 200 24 0.049
Median (50%) 540 82 0.16
75th percentile 1,200 240 0.45
95th percentile 3,200 1,300 2.8
Maximum (100%) >8,200 >10,000 200
Mean 930 300 1.1
a

The concentration was calculated by using the median fungal concentration for each building.

b

The distribution of ratios for each building was calculated by dividing the median indoor building concentration by the corresponding median outdoor concentration.

Seasonal concentrations.

Of the 1,717 buildings investigated, 359 were sampled in the winter, 465 were sampled in the spring, 414 were sampled in the summer, and 479 were sampled in the fall. The median outdoor fungal concentrations varied by season (P = 0.0001) and were highest in the fall and summer and lowest in the spring and winter. The indoor fungal concentrations varied in a similar manner (P = 0.0001). The ratio of indoor concentrations to outdoor concentrations did not vary substantially by season (P = 0.26).

Regional concentrations.

The median outdoor fungal concentrations varied by region (P = 0.0001) and were highest in the Southwest, Far West, and Southeast and lowest in the Northwest (Fig. 2). The indoor fungal concentrations also varied by region (P = 0.0001) and, like the outdoor levels, were highest in the Southwest, Far West, and Southeast. The indoor concentrations were lowest in the Northeast. The ratio of indoor concentrations to outdoor concentrations varied significantly by region (P = 0.0001), and the highest ratios were in the Far West and the Northwest (Fig. 3).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Distribution of airborne fungal concentrations by region and season for indoor and outdoor samples. The dotted bars indicate the inner quartiles ranging from the 25th percentile to the 75th percentile, and the horizontal lines indicate themedian fungal concentrations. The top of the vertical line represents the maximum observed value. The maximum value is shown at the top of the figure when it exceeds the scale.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Distribution of the indoor/outdoor fungal ratio for buildings by region and season. The dotted bars indicate the inner quartiles ranging from the 25th percentile to the 75th percentile, and the horizontal lines indicate the median fungal concentrations. The top of the vertical line represents the maximum observed value. The maximum value is shown at the top of the figure when it exceeds the scale.

Annual concentrations.

Of the 1,717 buildings investigated, the numbers analyzed each year were 427 in 1996, 571 in 1997, and 719 in 1998. Very small year-to-year variations occurred in the median outdoor concentrations (P = 0.19). No significant year-to-year variation was observed in the indoor fungal concentrations (P = 0.59) or in the ratio of indoor concentrations to outdoor concentrations (P = 0.48).

Fungi recovered.

The fungi most commonly recovered from both indoor and outdoor air were Cladosporium, Penicillium, Aspergillus, and the nonsporulating fungi. For indoor samples, Cladosporium, Penicillium, the nonsporulating fungi, and Aspergillus were detected in 86, 80, 80, and 62% of the buildings, respectively. Cladosporium, Penicillium, the nonsporulating fungi, and Aspergillus were detected in 92, 77, 92, and 49% of the outdoor samples, respectively. These organisms were detected in all regions and in all seasons. When detected in indoor samples, Cladosporium was usually found at a median concentration of approximately 40 CFU/m3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12 to 480 CFU/m3); Penicillium was found at a median concentration of approximately 30 CFU/m3 (95% CI, 12 to 570 CFU/m3); Aspergillus was found at a median concentration of approximately 20 CFU/m3 (95% CI, 12 to 373 CFU/m3); and the nonsporulating fungi were found at a median concentration of approximately 30 CFU/m3 (95% CI, 12 to 204 CFU/m3). When detected in outdoor samples, Cladosporium was usually found at a median concentration of approximately 200 CFU/m3 (95% CI, 18 to 1,849 CFU/m3); Penicillium was found at a median concentration of approximately 50 CFU/m3 (95% CI, 12 to 377 CFU/m3); Aspergillus was found at a median concentration of approximately 20 CFU/m3 (95% CI, 12 to 170 CFU/m3); and the nonsporulating fungi were found at a median concentration of approximately 100 CFU/m3 (95% CI, 12 to 901 CFU/m3).

Samples also were analyzed by determining the percentages of buildings positive for specific fungal types found by region and season. The results for the most common fungal types found in different regions and in different seasons are shown in Table 2, and the results for the less common types are shown in Table 3. The concentrations (mean, median, and 95th percentile) of the common fungal types are shown for each region in Tables 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 and for each season in Tables 10, 11, 12, and 13.

TABLE 2.

Percentages of buildings positive for common fungal types by region and season

Organism(s) % of buildings positive
Far Westa
Midwest
Northeast
F (n = 54)b SP (n = 47) SU (n = 43) W (n = 45) F (n = 100) SP (n = 87) SU (n = 101) W (n = 68) F (n = 69) SP (n = 86) SU (n = 63) W (n = 61)
Aspergillus flavus 2/4d 0/0 5/5 0/0 2/6 5/1 8/6 3/4 7/4 0/0 2/2 2/5
Aspergillus fumigatus 35/29 28/21 42/30 31/27 26/30 15/13 32/35 18/32 38/30 21/17 23/27 19/23
Aspergillus niger 31/44 13/6 30/37 9/13 23/29 14/1 32/28 13/13 25/28 9/2 13/21 11/3
Aspergillus speciesc 70/60 64/36 77/58 62/44 68/60 57/37 71/52 52/60 78/65 55/30 68/53 65/44
Aspergillus versicolor 43/11 34/9 56/21 33/4 39/15 36/3 38/7 33/16 41/12 24/9 40/10 44/18
Acremonium 11/2 2/9 5/5 4/4 14/4 8/1 15/4 4/1 10/6 5/2 11/3 6/0
Alternaria 24/25 15/15 9/14 9/13 15/20 9/13 21/27 10/10 14/14 1/6 16/19 8/5
Aureobasidium 17/9 19/13 5/9 16/16 14/7 10/10 7/8 4/6 17/30 9/18 10/18 16/8
Candida 11/13 19/15 12/16 24/24 18/17 7/20 10/16 10/7 16/25 9/13 16/15 3/11
Cladosporium 98/96 94/98 91/100 87/96 90/99 67/84 92/96 70/79 93/97 72/79 94/97 71/59
Curvularia 2/2 0/0 0/2 0/2 2/2 3/1 2/2 0/0 7/1 0/0 8/3 3/0
Epicoccum 19/7 0/4 2/14 4/2 18/27 0/5 13/16 4/4 14/16 1/1 11/15 5/0
Fusarium 6/2 21/2 7/5 2/7 18/21 5/2 21/26 0/6 6/9 0/3 16/18 16/0
Geotrichum 24/22 36/30 21/12 36/62 26/29 23/36 23/25 24/49 35/26 29/37 31/34 21/41
Hyalodendron 17/0 13/13 12/9 9/2 4/0 11/14 8/5 4/4 4/4 20/29 21/6 2/2
Nonsporulating fungi 81/93 83/98 86/95 82/96 84/95 66/84 91/98 70/85 83/96 64/85 89/97 76/80
Penicillium 91/82 87/83 86/88 93/91 80/84 64/59 86/82 64/60 94/88 71/55 85/82 71/56
Rhinocladiella 2/2 2/2 0/5 0/2 8/7 3/0 10/7 0/0 7/3 3/0 23/19 0/0
Rhodotorula 41/38 49/38 26/42 58/60 35/41 38/51 36/27 31/35 49/48 36/45 35/26 26/34
S. chartarum 15/2 9/2 5/0 4/2 8/0 7/1 8/2 6/0 10/0 5/1 3/2 6/2
Trichoderma 7/4 15/2 7/2 2/7 13/16 3/1 12/5 6/1 10/4 1/5 5/5 8/0
Tritirachium 24/9 9/9 9/14 18/2 56/37 13/6 30/22 16/3 48/39 15/1 32/15 8/2
Unidentified fungi 4/0 11/4 9/9 2/2 8/2 5/3 4/1 4/3 10/3 4/2 10/3 2/5
Yeast 20/13 19/28 21/19 29/20 19/12 20/15 35/17 21/25 35/20 20/24 35/10 24/34
a

See Fig. 1.

b

F, fall; SP, spring; SU, summer; W, winter.

c

Aspergillus species includes Eurotium, Emericella, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. versicolor, and all other Aspergillus species listed in Table 3.

d

Value for indoor samples/value for outdoor samples.

TABLE 3.

Percentages of buildings positive for fungal types by region and by season and fungal concentrations

Genus or species % of buildings positive
Concn (CFU/m3)
Total (n = 1,717) Far West (n = 189)a Midwest (n = 356) Northeast (n = 279) Northwest (n = 113) Southeast (n = 706) Southwest (n = 74) Fall (n = 479) Spring (n = 465) Summer (n = 414) Winter (n = 359) Meanb Medianc 95th percentiled
Arthrinium 2/4e 1/1 3/6 2/5 1/2 3/3 1/3 3/4 3/3 2/5 2/3 13/15 12/12 24/24
Aspergillus caespitosus 2/1 2/2 2/1 1/<1 3/1 1/<1 4/4 2/1 2/<1 3/1 1/1 30/23 12/12 140/71
Aspergillus candidus 3/1 3/3 2/1 3/<1 1/1 4/2 3/1 3/1 2/<1 4/3 3/1 15/15 12/12 27/35
Aspergillus carneus 2/2 2/3 1/1 1/2 2/0 2/3 7/4 3/3 1/1 3/3 1/2 21/14 12/12 35/30
Aspergillus clavatus 1/1 0/0 3/2 <1/1 1/0 1/1 0/0 1/2 0/0 2/2 0/0 13/24 12/12 35/82
Aspergillus ochraceus 7/2 5/3 6/2 7/<1 9/0 7/3 12/7 9/4 5/1 8/3 6/1 47/18 12/12 160/41
Aspergillus restrictus 7/5 9/2 5/6 7/4 12/12 7/4 3/3 8/3 7/5 6/3 6/8 19/20 12/12 47/36
Aspergillus sydowii 22/4 15/2 22/4 19/5 16/0 25/4 37/11 29/5 16/3 24/4 20/4 48/22 18/12 180/47
Aspergillus terreus <1/<1 1/0 0/<1 0/0 0/0 0/<1 0/0 <1/<1 0/0 0/1 0/0 47/14 47/12 47/18
Aspergillus unguis 2/<1 1/0 1/0 2/1 2/1 3/<1 3/1 3/<1 1/<1 2/<1 2/1 17/13 12/12 35/18
Aspergillus ustus 1/<1 1/1 2/0 2/0 2/0 1/<1 4/0 3/<1 <1/0 1/<1 1/<1 140/150 20/18 870/410
Aspergillus wentii 2/1 4/4 2/<1 <1/0 0/1 1/<1 5/3 2/1 1/0 2/2 2/1 23/28 12/12 110/180
Beauveria 8/5 8/4 12/7 6/4 8/4 5/5 16/5 13/8 4/4 6/3 7/6 15/19 12/12 24/42
Bipolaris 2/1 1/0 <1/1 <1/0 1/1 3/1 14/11 4/2 <1/<1 3/2 1/1 17/52 12/12 44/240
Botryosporium <1/0 1/0 <1/0 <1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/0 <1/0 1/0 0/0 12/0 12/0 12/0
Botrytis 1/2 1/1 1/1 1/0 2/0 2/3 1/4 3/4 <1/<1 1/1 1/1 43/49 12/12 180/240
Calcarisporium 1/2 1/1 1/<1 1/1 0/0 2/3 1/4 1/2 1/2 3/2 1/<1 13/16 12/12 18/35
Chaetomium 3/<1 6/1 3/<1 2/<1 2/0 2/<1 3/0 3/<1 3/0 4/1 1/<1 28/12 12/12 120/13
Chrysonilia 2/1 3/1 1/<1 1/0 0/0 2/1 1/0 2/<1 2/0 2/1 1/1 25/12 12/12 59/12
Chrysosporium 2/2 1/1 2/1 3/2 1/1 2/2 1/0 1/1 2/1 5/5 0/0 24/24 12/12 94/59
Cunninghamella <1/0 0/0 <1/0 0/0 0/0 <1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 <1/0 <1/0 12/0 12/0 12/0
Drechslera <1/<1 0/0 0/0 <1/<1 1/0 <1/1 1/0 <1/<1 1/1 <1/1 0/0 18/36 17/24 35/110
Eupenicillium <1/0 0/0 0/0 <1/0 0/0 <1/0 0/0 0/0 <1/0 <1/0 0/0 12/0 12/0 12/0
Eurotium 7/5 9/6 7/7 9/6 9/5 6/3 5/4 9/4 4/4 8/3 9/8 25/17 12/12 71/47
Exophiala <1/<1 1/0 <1/0 0/0 0/0 <1/<1 1/0 <1/0 0/<1 1/0 <1/0 13/12 12/12 18/12
Gliocladium <1/<1 2/0 0/0 0/<1 0/0 <1/<1 0/0 <1/<1 <1/<1 <1/0 0/0 18/18 18/18 24/24
Gliomastix 1/<1 1/0 2/0 <1/0 1/0 1/<1 0/0 1/0 1/0 1/<1 1/0 90/12 12/12 570/12
Humicola <1/0 0/0 0/0 <1/0 1/0 0/0 0/0 <1/0 <1/0 0/0 0/0 24/0 24/0 35/0
Memnoniella <1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 <1/0 1/0 0/0 <1/0 0/0 <1/0 12/0 12/0 12/0
Monocillium 10/4 11/6 10/3 6/5 10/2 11/3 16/1 16/5 5/4 11/2 8/4 25/26 12/12 35/47
Mucor 5/2 9/5 6/2 3/2 2/1 4/2 3/3 4/3 6/2 5/3 3/1 24/15 12/12 110/25
Nigrospora 1/2 1/2 1/1 1/<1 1/1 2/2 1/4 3/2 0/0 2/3 <1/<1 15/27 12/12 24/35
Oedocephalum 0/4 0/10 0/1 0/2 0/2 0/6 0/0 0/4 0/5 0/1 0/8 0/45 0/23 0/170
Oidiodendron 7/2 12/4 6/1 6/4 4/1 7/3 1/0 7/1 7/2 6/2 8/3 21/17 12/12 59/35
Ostracaderma 1/<1 0/0 <1/0 1/0 1/1 <1/0 1/1 0/<1 1/0 1/0 1/0 17/24 12/24 28/35
Paecilomyces 10/4 10/5 11/4 7/3 10/3 10/3 11/5 12/3 5/3 14/6 8/2 65/52 12/12 140/200
Pestalotia 0/1 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/0 0/17 0/12 0/45
Peziza <1/0 0/0 <1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 <1/0 0/0 12/0 12/0 12/0
Phialophora <1/<1 0/1 0/0 <1/0 0/0 <1/0 0/0 0/0 0/<1 1/0 0/0 18/12 18/12 24/12
Pithomyces 2/1 1/1 3/2 3/2 3/0 2/1 4/3 5/4 <1/0 2/2 <1/<1 22/44 12/24 71/190
Rhizoctonia 0/<1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/<1 0/0 0/12 0/12 0/12
Rhizopus 6/4 7/7 7/4 6/3 6/5 6/4 4/5 8/5 7/3 4/6 5/2 26/23 12/12 71/82
Scopulariopsis 4/1 7/3 3/1 4/1 12/4 3/1 4/1 4/<1 5/1 4/1 4/2 35/17 12/12 110/35
Sporobolomyces 7/2 4/2 9/3 8/3 4/0 6/1 14/0 6/2 4/2 13/1 5/3 56/67 17/24 240/280
Sporothrix 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/0 4/0 1/2 1/0 <1/<1 2/2 2/1 1/1 14/18 12/12 30/47
Syncephalastrum <1/<1 0/1 1/0 <1/0 0/0 <1/0 0/0 0/0 <1/0 0/0 1/<1 77/12 24/12 250/12
Torulomyces 1/<1 2/0 <1/0 1/1 0/0 1/1 1/0 2/<1 <1/<1 1/1 <1/0 16/17 12/15 35/24
Trichocladium <1/<1 0/0 0/0 0/<1 0/0 <1/0 0/0 <1/0 0/<1 0/0 0/0 18/12 18/12 18/12
Trichothecium <1/<1 0/0 1/0 <1/0 0/1 <1/0 0/1 <1/0 0/0 1/<1 1/<1 16/12 12/12 35/12
Ulocladium 2/1 10/5 1/1 2/<1 4/3 <1/<1 1/1 3/2 2/2 2/2 2/0 84/22 12/15 200/59
Verticillium 2/1 4/1 2/2 2/0 2/0 2/1 1/1 2/1 2/1 2/1 3/1 35/24 12/12 53/94
Wallemia 5/1 4/1 4/1 5/1 1/0 7/1 8/1 7/1 4/1 5/<1 5/3 30/45 12/12 72/550
Zygosporium 0/<1 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/<1 0/<1 0/1 0/420 0/24 0/1700
a

See Fig. 1.

b

The mean is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected. Means without this restriction can be determined by muliplying the percentage of buildings positive by the corresponding mean (e.g., the indoor mean for Acremonium is 0.23 × 23 = 5).

c

The median value is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

d

The 95th percentile is based on the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings in which the fungus was detected.

e

Value for indoor samples/value for outdoor samples.

TABLE 4.

Airborne fungal concentrations for the Far West

Organism(s) Concn (CFU/m3)
Meana Medianb 95th percentilec
Aspergillus flavus 32/15 (24/6)e 24/12 59/23
Aspergillus fumigatus 22/69 (27/230) 12/18 65/140
Aspergillus niger 34/30 (63/24) 12/24 200/82
Aspergillus speciesd 96/57 (270/110) 24/24 420/180
Aspergillus versicolor 120/17 (300/12) 13/12 730/47
Acremonium 25/27 (38/26) 12/12 100/110
Alternaria 20/32 (13/27) 12/24 50/94
Aureobasidium 32/20 (97/10) 12/12 24/41
Candida 19/24 (18/22) 12/24 35/47
Cladosporium 150/450 (280/600) 53/260 790/1,800
Curvularia 12/590 (-/990) 12/12 12/1,700
Epicoccum 19/15 (9/5) 18/12 36/24
Fusarium 15/16 (5/7) 12/12 24/24
Geotrichum 59/210 (170/350) 24/59 190/950
Hyalodendron 25/280 (34/790) 12/23 47/2700
Nonsporulating fungi 61/180 (100/230) 30/94 190/520
Penicillium 230/100 (630/150) 47/48 1,300/380
Rhinocladiella 28/21 (5/21) 28/12 31/59
Rhodotorula 20/53 (14/100) 12/24 47/140
S. chartarum 23/16 (23/7) 12/12 110/24
Trichoderma 15/12 (7/0) 12/12 35/12
Tritirachium 140/38 (650/50) 12/12 59/190
Unidentified fungi 17/14 (6/5) 12/12 27/24
Yeast 22/130 (26/570) 12/24 58/180
a

The mean is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

b

The median value is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

c

The 95th percentile is based on the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

d

Aspergillus species includes Eurotium, Emericella, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. versicolor, and all other Aspergillus species listed in Table 3.

e

Value for indoor samples/value for outdoor samples (standard deviation for indoor samples/standard deviation for outdoor samples).

TABLE 5.

Airborne fungal concentrations for the Midwest

Organism(s) Concn (CFU/m3)
Meana Medianb 95th percentilec
Aspergillus flavus 78/30 (240/46)e 12/15 980/200
Aspergillus fumigatus 96/74 (270/180) 12/18 650/380
Aspergillus niger 23/45 (21/130) 12/12 71/110
Aspergillus speciesd 110/65 (300/180) 18/24 560/200
Aspergillus versicolor 75/15 (210/9) 12/12 330/35
Acremonium 22/62 (21/120) 12/24 59/210
Alternaria 19/70 (15/100) 12/35 59/290
Aureobasidium 13/21 (4/19) 12/12 24/41
Candida 14/23 (6/21) 12/12 24/71
Cladosporium 130/550 (300/780) 42/210 480/2,400
Curvularia 15/14 (9/5) 12/12 35/24
Epicoccum 22/71 (20/210) 12/24 71/180
Fusarium 17/37 (10/44) 12/24 35/94
Geotrichum 50/140 (110/300) 24/35 190/580
Hyalodendron 26/240 (44/780) 12/18 47/2,000
Nonsporulating fungi 66/230 (150/400) 29/110 190/800
Penicillium 130/140 (330/360) 32/36 520/640
Rhinocladiella 23/37 (25/41) 12/24 59/170
Rhodotorula 24/97 (54/300) 12/24 41/400
S. chartarum 37/120 (46/170) 12/24 140/320
Trichoderma 18/16 (15/7) 12/12 35/24
Tritirachium 59/150 (140/230) 22/56 190/530
Unidentified fungi 14/47 (5/72) 12/24 24/220
Yeast 23/65 (49/240) 12/18 55/180
a

The mean is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

b

The median value is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

c

The 95th percentile is based on the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

d

Aspergillus species includes Eurotium, Emericella, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. versicolor, and all other Aspergillus species listed in Table 3.

e

Value for indoor samples/value for outdoor samples (standard deviation for indoor samples/standard deviation for outdoor samples).

TABLE 6.

Airborne fungal concentrations for the Northeast

Organism(s) Concn (CFU/m3)
Meana Medianb 95th percentilec
Aspergillus flavus 14/16 (6/6)e 12/12 21/24
Aspergillus fumigatus 23/54 (40/110) 12/12 59/300
Aspergillus niger 24/25 (25/51) 12/12 96/59
Aspergillus speciesd 58/41 (180/67) 17/18 200/190
Aspergillus versicolor 59/19 (170/15) 12/12 280/53
Acremonium 24/39 (24/38) 12/20 71/130
Alternaria 18/30 (14/17) 12/24 42/59
Aureobasidium 16/28 (11/42) 12/12 47/82
Candida 18/24 (23/25) 12/12 71/82
Cladosporium 80/290 (180/480) 24/140 360/1,200
Curvularia 13/22 (2/15) 12/24 18/35
Epicoccum 18/24 (10/16) 12/23 35/59
Fusarium 22/28 (22/19) 12/24 83/71
Geotrichum 29/160 (43/300) 12/43 89/660
Hyalodendron 31/140 (45/330) 12/35 170/870
Nonsporulating fungi 57/200 (120/370) 24/71 200/880
Penicillium 130/88 (350/200) 30/36 500/240
Rhinocladiella 18/38 (8/28) 12/30 35/110
Rhodotorula 21/53 (16/96) 12/24 56/140
S. chartarum 17/9 (11/5) 12/12 47/12
Trichoderma 18/14 (18/5) 12/12 81/24
Tritirachium 53/110 (150/190) 12/47 170/540
Unidentified fungi 13/19 (6/8) 12/12 36/35
Yeast 26/30 (58/40) 12/22 59/82
a

The mean is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

b

The median value is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

c

The 95th percentile is based on the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

d

Aspergillus species includes Eurotium, Emericella, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. versicolor, and all other Aspergillus species listed in Table 3.

e

Value for indoor samples/value for outdoor samples (standard deviation for indoor samples/standard deviation for outdoor samples).

TABLE 7.

Airborne fungal concentrations for the Northwest

Organism(s) Concn (CFU/m3)
Meana Medianb 95th percentilec
Aspergillus flavus 14/24 (2/20)e 14/12 15/47
Aspergillus fumigatus 24/28 (23/47) 12/12 71/130
Aspergillus niger 24/21 (17/14) 12/12 59/53
Aspergillus speciesd 75/46 (160/80) 24/19 330/200
Aspergillus versicolor 100/22 (290/14) 20/12 410/47
Acremonium 20/65 (17/100) 12/24 59/350
Alternaria 23/53 (16/65) 22/35 71/190
Aureobasidium 15/19 (7/13) 12/12 36/47
Candida 18/26 (13/40) 12/12 47/140
Cladosporium 85/410 (150/700) 42/110 380/1,900
Curvularia 12/23 (0/—) 12/23 12/23
Epicoccum 45/36 (60/26) 12/23 160/71
Fusarium 12/17 (0/10) 12/12 12/35
Geotrichum 18/150 (9/400) 12/24 42/1,600
Hyalodendron 23/18 (12/8) 20/18 47/24
Nonsporulating fungi 37/120 (46/240) 24/59 120/350
Penicillium 200/82 (460/220) 36/24 1,300/270
Rhinocladiella 13/ND (4/ND)f 12/ND 24/ND
Rhodotorula 37/49 (40/88) 21/24 160/150
S. chartarum 48/12 (56/0) 12/12 160/12
Trichoderma 30/29 (15/8) 30/29 56/35
Tritirachium 60/59 (190/75) 12/30 94/240
Unidentified fungi 18/39 (9/73) 15/12 35/250
Yeast 19/28 (14/18) 12/24 37/70
a

The mean is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

b

The median value is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

c

The 95th percentile is based on the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

d

Aspergillus species includes Eurotium, Emericella, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. versicolor, and all other Aspergillus species listed in Table 3.

e

Value for indoor samples/value for outdoor samples (standard deviation for indoor samples/standard deviation for outdoor samples).

f

ND, not detected.

TABLE 8.

Airborne fungal concentrations for the Southeast

Organism(s) Concn (CFU/m3)
Meana Medianb 95th percentilec
Aspergillus flavus 23/15 (23/7)e 12/12 83/35
Aspergillus fumigatus 20/32 (22/45) 12/18 53/110
Aspergillus niger 54/30 (150/44) 12/12 230/94
Aspergillus speciesd 110/38 (400/57) 21/24 410/120
Aspergillus versicolor 71/25 (170/43) 18/12 310/82
Acremonium 23/41 (21/53) 15/24 62/120
Alternaria 20/33 (12/34) 12/24 44/94
Aureobasidium 16/32 (6/32) 12/22 28/110
Candida 14/19 (7/14) 12/12 24/59
Cladosporium 130/460 (330/610) 47/230 480/1,600
Curvularia 28/58 (27/92) 18/35 94/180
Epicoccum 19/40 (24/77) 12/18 53/140
Fusarium 21/36 (24/47) 12/24 71/140
Geotrichum 76/260 (200/520) 24/59 260/1,300
Hyalodendron 31/110 (45/340) 17/25 110/470
Nonsporulating fungi 66/280 (120/510) 30/140 240/1,100
Penicillium 120/120 (360/270) 30/53 490/400
Rhinocladiella 21/42 (16/46) 18/32 47/130
Rhodotorula 28/59 (60/130) 15/24 58/180
S. chartarum 34/53 (73/88) 12/12 140/230
Trichoderma 23/18 (47/11) 12/12 45/35
Tritirachium 46/79 (150/140) 18/34 140/270
Unidentified fungi 19/23 (16/16) 12/18 41/59
Yeast 21/26 (24/16) 12/24 53/59
a

The mean is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

b

The median value is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

c

The 95th percentile is based on the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

d

Aspergillus species includes Eurotium, Emericella, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. versicolor, and all other Aspergillus species listed in Table 3.

e

Value for indoor samples/value for outdoor samples (standard deviation for indoor samples/standard deviation for outdoor samples).

TABLE 9.

Airborne fungal concentrations for the Southwest

Organism(s) Concn (CFU/m3)
Meana Medianb 95th percentilec
Aspergillus flavus 11/17 (2/7)e 12/12 12/24
Aspergillus fumigatus 16/43 (11/62) 12/12 44/150
Aspergillus niger 73/61 (230/81) 16/35 550/200
Aspergillus speciesd 99/61 (370/73) 24/36 230/200
Aspergillus versicolor 75/15 (190/5) 14/12 260/24
Acremonium 22/24 (18/15) 14/20 60/53
Alternaria 19/59 (13/42) 12/50 47/130
Aureobasidium 160/21 (490/16) 12/12 1,600/71
Candida 14/16 (5/6) 12/12 24/24
Cladosporium 134/630 (280/880) 47/280 490/3,500
Curvularia 15/32 (5/24) 12/24 24/71
Epicoccum 9/14 (4/8) 9/12 12/24
Fusarium 16/79 (9/170) 12/24 35/590
Geotrichum 34/160 (30/190) 20/83 110/600
Hyalodendron 18/52 (7/36) 18/47 24/94
Nonsporulating fungi 63/350 (77/630) 31/140 290/1,400
Penicillium 150/80 (500/100) 36/33 370/350
Rhinocladiella 25/38 (15/31) 24/24 65/110
Rhodotorula 18/46 (10/49) 12/24 36/170
S. chartarum 15/ND (10/ND)f 12/ND 35/ND
Trichoderma 15/71 (11/130) 12/12 35/310
Tritirachium 28/56 (29/85) 12/35 130/290
Unidentified fungi 19/21 (23/15) 12/12 94/47
Yeast 24/53 (37/61) 12/24 67/170
a

The mean is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

b

The median value is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

c

The 95th percentile is based on the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

d

Aspergillus species includes Eurotium, Emericella, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. versicolor, and all other Aspergillus species listed in Table 3.

e

Value for indoor samples/value for outdoor samples (standard deviation for indoor samples/standard deviation for outdoor samples).

f

ND, not detected.

TABLE 10.

Airborne fungal concentrations for fall

Organism(s) Concn (CFU/m3)
Meana Medianb 95th percentilec
Aspergillus flavus 15/16 (5/6)e 12/12 24/24
Aspergillus fumigatus 37/48 (130/120) 12/18 71/150
Aspergillus niger 26/32 (42/40) 12/15 82/110
Aspergillus speciesd 102/49 (380/95) 24/24 370/190
Aspergillus versicolor 76/19 (180/21) 12/12 410/47
Acremonium 24/56 (23/94) 15/30 59/190
Alternaria 23/66 (17/70) 12/36 59/240
Aureobasidium 24/30 (66/42) 12/17 30/82
Candida 19/25 (23/27) 12/12 71/82
Cladosporium 180/640 (410/820) 59/290 810/2,500
Curvularia 25/59 (26/100) 12/24 94/280
Epicoccum 24/60 (27/180) 18/24 53/150
Fusarium 23/43 (25/69) 12/24 71/140
Geotrichum 62/280 (180/560) 21/59 250/1,300
Hyalodendron 31/22 (59/20) 12/12 110/71
Nonsporulating fungi 72/240 (140/320) 35/140 250/870
Penicillium 150/160 (410/330) 38/71 620/440
Rhinocladiella 22/45 (13/36) 18/35 47/130
Rhodotorula 32/100 (69/290) 18/35 63/410
S. chartarum 33/24 (62/12) 12/24 120/35
Trichoderma 27/15 (55/6) 12/12 81/35
Tritirachium 67/110 (260/190) 18/47 190/410
Unidentified fungi 21/24 (21/17) 12/18 65/71
Yeast 24/31 (30/27) 12/24 67/82
a

The mean is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

b

The median value is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

c

The 95th percentile is based on the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

d

Aspergillus species includes Eurotium, Emericella, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. versicolor, and all other Aspergillus species listed in Table 3.

e

Value for indoor samples/value for outdoor samples (standard deviation for indoor samples/standard deviation for outdoor samples).

TABLE 11.

Airborne fungal concentrations for spring

Organism(s) Concn (CFU/m3)
Meana Medianb 95th percentilec
Aspergillus flavus 20/13 (16/2)e 12/12 71/18
Aspergillus fumigatus 39/38 (160/80) 12/12 47/130
Aspergillus niger 58/29 (200/62) 12/12 110/53
Aspergillus speciesd 66/33 (280/54) 18/18 220/120
Aspergillus versicolor 42/20 (92/16) 18/12 150/53
Acremonium 19/28 (21/27) 12/12 59/110
Alternaria 16/26 (8/28) 12/12 35/71
Aureobasidium 15/26 (8/25) 12/12 35/110
Candida 15/24 (7/24) 12/12 35/71
Cladosporium 86/350 (200/590) 35/130 320/1,500
Curvularia 22/120 (17/210) 12/30 59/550
Epicoccum 16/40 (10/78) 12/18 36/350
Fusarium 16/36 (8/68) 12/18 35/88
Geotrichum 55/190 (200/420) 18/40 200/800
Hyalodendron 39/200 (50/550) 18/36 170/870
Nonsporulating fungi 54/230 (110/540) 24/82 160/1,000
Penicillium 130/52 (430/95) 24/24 480/180
Rhinocladiella 21/21 (14/14) 12/12 48/47
Rhodotorula 21/44 (18/63) 12/24 47/170
S. chartarum 31/45 (44/83) 12/12 140/230
Trichoderma 17/19 (10/15) 12/12 35/59
Tritirachium 31/27 (70/38) 12/12 59/59
Unidentified fungi 16/26 (7/46) 12/12 35/36
Yeast 21/29 (20/30) 12/18 48/71
a

The mean is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

b

The median value is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

c

The 95th percentile is based on the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

d

Aspergillus species includes Eurotium, Emericella, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. versicolor, and all other Aspergillus species listed in Table 3.

e

Value for indoor samples/value for outdoor samples (standard deviation for indoor samples/standard deviation for outdoor samples).

TABLE 12.

Airborne fungal concentrations for summer

Organism(s) Concn (CFU/m3)
Meana Medianb 95th percentilec
Aspergillus flavus 77/26 (230/38)e 15/12 980/47
Aspergillus fumigatus 49/73 (160/210) 12/12 130/320
Aspergillus niger 44/43 (95/110) 12/18 180/83
Aspergillus speciesd 120/69 (320/160) 24/24 590/260
Aspergillus versicolor 120/18 (300/13) 18/12 730/55
Acremonium 24/38 (25/51) 16/24 71/140
Alternaria 21/49 (16/78) 16/25 59/150
Aureobasidium 61/23 (280/15) 12/12 24/49
Candida 14/17 (7/8) 12/12 35/24
Cladosporium 130/500 (260/580) 47/290 540/1,700
Curvularia 25/77 (25/250) 17/35 82/150
Epicoccum 19/35 (25/69) 12/17 71/140
Fusarium 17/35 (13/40) 12/24 35/94
Geotrichum 63/120 (120/260) 24/44 250/520
Hyalodendron 18/88 (16/340) 12/21 47/59
Nonsporulating fungi 76/270 (150/440) 35/130 300/1,100
Penicillium 160/140 (410/320) 40/60 790/500
Rhinocladiella 21/40 (22/38) 12/30 47/130
Rhodotorula 21/65 (20/150) 12/24 59/250
S. chartarum 34/73 (42/140) 12/12 140/320
Trichoderma 17/29 (9/58) 12/12 35/35
Tritirachium 63/120 (220/190) 20/47 170/620
Unidentified fungi 17/37 (7/62) 12/18 35/250
Yeast 25/140 (62/520) 12/24 48/240
a

The mean is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

b

The median value is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

c

The 95th percentile is based on the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

d

Aspergillus species includes Eurotium, Emericella, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. versicolor, and all other Aspergillus species listed in Table 3.

e

Value for indoor samples/value for outdoor samples (standard deviation for indoor samples/standard deviation for outdoor samples).

TABLE 13.

Airborne fungal concentrations for winter

Organism(s) Concn (CFU/m3)
Meana Medianb 95th percentilec
Aspergillus flavus 30/17 (41/8)e 12/12 120/35
Aspergillus fumigatus 22/43 (29/67) 12/12 75/190
Aspergillus niger 50/17 (150/14) 13/12 100/71
Aspergillus speciesd 79/37 (240/57) 18/18 280/150
Aspergillus versicolor 81/23 (220/42) 12/12 510/47
Acremonium 22/28 (24/30) 12/12 71/130
Alternaria 14/31 (8/32) 12/13 36/120
Aureobasidium 16/26 (8/26) 12/12 36/95
Candida 14/21 (6/20) 12/12 30/47
Cladosporium 68/260 (130/430) 28/94 230/1,100
Curvularia 14/33 (3/28) 12/35 18/110
Epicoccum 20/22 (24/16) 12/12 110/71
Fusarium 17/22 (10/18) 12/18 35/35
Geotrichum 39/220 (57/400) 24/59 140/1,200
Hyalodendron 18/15 (8/7) 12/12 35/24
Nonsporulating fungi 39/210 (53/420) 24/83 150/760
Penicillium 120/72 (380/150) 24/35 520/280
Rhinocladiella 15/50 (6/91) 12/18 35/390
Rhodotorula 25/47 (52/63) 12/24 56/170
S. chartarum 14/8 (6/6) 12/8 35/12
Trichoderma 16/15 (9/8) 12/12 36/35
Tritirachium 38/57 (120/90) 12/24 47/200
Unidentified fungi 14/18 (5/11) 12/12 24/47
Yeast 19/24 (16/16) 12/18 59/59
a

The mean is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

b

The median value is the average of the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

c

The 95th percentile is based on the median concentrations for all buildings, restricted to buildings where the fungus was detected.

d

Aspergillus species includes Eurotium, Emericella, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. versicolor, and all other Aspergillus species listed in Table 3.

e

Value for indoor samples/value for outdoor samples (standard deviation for indoor samples/standard deviation for outdoor samples).

Questionnaire results.

Based on the telephone questionnaires, the building types were as follows: office building, 46%; school, 18%; hospital, 13%; residence, 4%; industrial, 0%; and other, 18%. The reasons for submitting samples fell into the following five categories: reported health complaints, 45%; proactive sampling, 16%; visible fungal growth, 8%; water damage, 8%; and other, 5%. No difference was found between the fungal counts for the buildings whose investigators did participate in the telephone questionnaire (82%) and the fungal counts for the buildings whose investigators did not participate in the telephone questionnaire (18%) (P = 0.09 for median CFU per cubic meter and P = 0.26 for mean CFU per cubic meter). The median indoor levels varied according to the primary reported reason for sample submission (Table 14). The highest concentrations were found in samples submitted from buildings because of visible fungal growth. The next highest levels were found in samples from buildings for which there were health complaints. Total fungal counts were not associated with reported coughs (P = 0.8), reported skin problems (P = 0.5), or reported eye problems (P = 0.8). However, the median indoor levels were higher for buildings in which hypersensitivity pneumonitis was reported than for buildings with no reported hypersensitivity pneumonitis (260 and 47 CFU/m3, respectively; P = 0.02).

TABLE 14.

Fungal concentrations sorted by reason for sampling

Reason No. of samples Concn (CFU/m3)
Median indoor/ outdoor ratio
Indoor mean Indoor median
Healtha 45 101 71 0.21
Visible fungib 8 379 141 0.29
Water damagec 8 56 46 0.12
Proactive 16 31 12 0.02
a

The questionnaire responses for health included the following categories: eye, throat, cough, shortness of breath, headache, skin, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and other. For purposes of analysis, health included health, odor and health, water damage and health, visual growth and health, odor and visual growth and health, and water damage and visual growth and health.

b

For purposes of analysis, visible fungi included visual growth, and visual growth and water damage.

c

For purposes of analysis, water damage included water damage and odor and water damage.

Stachybotrys.

The percentages of buildings positive for selected species sorted by reason for sample submission are shown in Table 15. Predominant species were chosen along with selected other fungi that have the potential to produce mycotoxins. Because of particular interest in toxigenic fungi, we noted that Stachybotrys chartarum was identified in indoor air in 6% of the buildings studied. When this species was present, the median concentration was 12 CFU/m3 (95% CI, 12 to 118 CFU/m3). It was found in similar percentages of buildings in all regions and in all seasons. S. chartarum was identified in the outdoor air of 1% of the buildings studied. When it was detected, the median concentration was 12 CFU/m3 (95% CI, 4 to 318 CFU/m3). It also was found in outdoor air at similar frequencies in all regions and in all seasons.

TABLE 15.

Percentages of buildings positive for common fungal species sorted by reason for submission and odds ratios for association with reported health effects

Organism(s) % of buildings positive
Odds ratiod P value
Health (n = 45)a Visible fungi (n = 8)b Water damage (n = 8)c Proactive (n = 16)
Acremonium 9 25 0 19 0.4 0.4
Aspergillus speciesf 71 83 75 69 1.1 1.0
Aspergillus flavus 2 13 25 0 Undefinedg 1.0
Aspergillus fumigatus 20 38 25 31 0.6 0.5
Aspergillus niger 22 38 25 19 1.2 1.0
Aspergillus versicolor 40 63 38 25 2.0 0.4
Alternaria 13 0 0 0 Undefined 0.3
Aureobasidium 18 0 0 0 Undefined 0.1
Candida 4 0 0 6 0.7 1.0
Cladosporium 87 100 63 94 0.4 0.7
Curvularia 22 13 0 6 4.3 0.3
Epicoccum 7 0 0 13 0.5 0.6
Fusarium 11 13 0 13 0.9 1.0
Geotrichum 24 50 38 31 0.7 0.7
Hyalodendron 16 0 13 19 0.8 0.7
Nonsporulating fungi 80 100 50 69 1.8 0.5
Penicillium 82 100 63 88 0.7 1.0
Rhinocladiella 16 25 25 19 0.8 0.7
Rhodotorula 36 38 25 31 1.2 1.0
Stachybotrys 4 38 25 0 Undefined 1.0
Trichoderma 11 13 13 13 0.9 1.0
Unidentified fungi 7 0 0 0 Undefined 0.6
Yeast 22 13 25 25 0.9 1.0
a

The questionnaire responses for health included the following categories: eye, throat, cough, shortness of breath, headache, skin, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and other. For purposes of analysis, health included health, odor and health, water damage and health, visual growth and health, odor and visual growth and health, and water damage and visual growth and health.

b

For purposes of analysis, visible fungi included visual growth and visual growth and water damage.

c

For purposes of analysis, water damage included water damage and odor and water damage.

d

The odds ratio measures the association between reporting of health effects and detection of fungal type in buildings using as the comparison category buildings for which proactive was reported as the reason for submission. For example, the odds ratio for Acremonium is (0.09)(1 − 0.19) ÷ [(1 − 0.09) × (0.19)] = 0.4.

f

Aspergillus species includes Eurotium, Emericella, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. versicolor, and all other Aspergillus species listed in Table 3.

g

For undefined odds ratios the denominator is zero.

Of the samples submitted primarily because of health complaints, 2 of 45 were positive for Stachybotrys (average median indoor concentration when the organism was present, 12 CFU/m3). Of the samples submitted primarily because of visible fungal growth, three of eight were positive for Stachybotrys (average median indoor concentration when the organism was present, 52 CFU/m3). Of the samples submitted primarily because of water damage, two of eight were positive for Stachybotrys (average median indoor concentration when the organism was present, 12 CFU/m3). Of the samples submitted primarily for proactive sampling, none of 16 was positive for Stachybotrys. Detection of Stachybotrys in buildings for which reported health complaints were the primary reason for submission was not significantly different from detection in proactive comparison buildings. No statistically significant association was observed between any common fungal type and reported health complaints (Table 15).

DISCUSSION

This study is unique because it described culturable fungi obtained from indoor air and outdoor air from a large sample including samples collected during all four seasons of the year in six regions of the United States for several years. Overall, the median indoor fungal concentrations were 6 to 7 times lower than the median outdoor fungal concentrations.

The sizes of the median indoor and outdoor fungal populations varied significantly by season. Both the indoor and outdoor populations were largest in the fall and summer and smallest in the spring and summer. The higher outdoor concentrations in the summer and fall may reflect higher temperatures and humidities and resulting increases in microbiological activity in these periods. The ratio of the concentration of fungi in indoor air to the concentration of fungi in outdoor air remained fairly constant in all seasons, even though the absolute levels fluctuated. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that outdoor air has an important influence on indoor air quality. Thus, outdoor comparison samples should be collected when indoor air quality investigations are conducted. Although the median fungal ratio remained fairly constant from season to season, there was substantial variation from building to building.

The regional variation in fungal concentrations was substantial, and the indoor and outdoor concentrations were highest in the Southwest, Far West, and Southeast. The outdoor levels were lowest in the Northwest, and the values were intermediate in the other two regions. The indoor concentrations were lowest in the Northeast and intermediate in the other two areas. The ratio of indoor fungal population size to outdoor fungal population size ranged from about 0.1 to about 0.5. There was no significant variation in the seasonal ratios, so region may be more important than season in determining ratios of indoor population size to outdoor population size. The indoor and outdoor populations varied only slightly from year to year, and the variation was not statistically significant.

Cladosporium, Penicillium, Aspergillus, and nonsporulating fungi were the most common fungi indoors and outdoors in each season and in each region. The significance of the presence of S. chartarum in indoor settings is currently being debated (4, 5, 6, 8, 10). S. chartarum was detected in the indoor air of 6% of the buildings sampled and in the outdoor air of 1% of the buildings sampled; however, we had four times as many indoor samples as outdoor samples. The results of this study suggest that the presence of Stachybotrys is not highly unusual and that this genus is present at similar frequencies across the United States.

Fungal analyses were requested for different reasons, including employee health complaints, assessment of microbial levels following water damage, evaluation of visible fungal growth or odors, or as part of a proactive indoor air quality program. The median indoor fungal levels varied according to the primary reason for sample submission; buildings for which visible fungal growth was reported had the largest populations, proactive samples had the smallest populations, and the populations in buildings in which there was water damage or health complaints were intermediate. We found particularly large fungal populations in association with reported hypersensitivity pneumonitis, which presumably reflected the known causal connection between hypersensitivity pneumonitis and exposure to high fungal levels (27). Although the purpose of this study was not to measure any potential health association and the number of questionnaires was small, we found no association between reported health complaints and the presence of any common fungal type or potentially toxigenic fungus.

The submitted samples which we analyzed were not collected randomly, but they did indicate the range of fungal concentrations and the most common airborne fungi in buildings across the United States. The other limitations of our data set include (i) the fact there was no information about the reason for sample collection (for samples other than the subset of samples for which questionnaire information was received), (ii) the fact that there was no information about the building conditions where samples were collected, and (iii) the fact that there was no information about whether samples were taken from complaint areas. However, results for outdoor air should be relatively unaffected by any bias that applies to sample collection in indoor settings. The geographic regions which we studied were large and could contain localized areas with different patterns of fungal growth. Furthermore, the highest reported concentrations might be underestimates, since very high concentrations may overload a sampler. The impact of this limitation on our results, however, should have been minimized by our use of medians in most analyses. Thus, the results of this large descriptive study provide comparative data that can be used to better interpret bioaerosol samples and to improve our understanding of the role of fungi in indoor air quality investigations.

TABLE 2.

Continued

% of buildings positive
Northwest
Southeast
Southwest
F (n = 26) SP (n = 36) SU (n = 25) W (n = 26) F (n = 198) SP (n = 196) SU (n = 168) W (n = 144) F (n = 32) SP (n = 13) SU (n = 14) W (n = 15)
8/0 0/3 0/4 0/4 6/8 5/2 4/7 4/1 16/9 0/0 0/14 0/0
23/19 14/14 24/32 19/8 21/20 17/18 17/18 11/16 13/3 15/0 14/14 7/13
27/19 14/8 32/24 19/12 30/29 10/7 23/32 14/9 38/41 8/8 36/64 13/27
69/35 61/44 64/48 54/50 73/56 49/36 57/52 55/44 72/53 62/31 50/79 53/67
38/8 31/8 28/4 19/19 34/11 28/6 27/6 26/12 41/25 38/0 7/21 33/27
15/12 6/0 4/0 4/0 11/12 5/3 6/4 3/5 28/13 8/0 0/0 7/13
15/38 11/14 12/28 15/19 2/7 5/9 4/13 4/6 16/19 0/15 14/36 0/20
8/8 11/14 8/4 12/8 9/11 9/9 10/7 7/10 13/25 23/23 14/7 13/20
15/15 8/6 0/12 8/4 5/4 8/8 5/4 5/9 0/6 31/8 14/7 7/13
85/92 97/94 88/96 85/77 89/96 85/92 86/96 88/90 88/91 100/92 86/100 87/93
8/4 0/0 8/0 0/0 16/12 4/3 18/24 5/6 16/19 0/0 7/7 0/13
19/15 0/0 12/8 4/4 5/9 3/6 5/10 5/6 3/6 0/0 7/0 0/13
0/8 3/3 4/4 4/4 14/30 7/9 12/24 1/15 13/28 8/8 7/7 0/0
12/8 22/17 28/24 0/8 21/30 19/35 24/32 30/52 16/6 54/54 29/43 20/33
4/4 8/0 8/4 8/0 6/3 15/17 13/7 8/3 0/0 8/31 14/7 7/0
77/88 75/78 88/92 65/65 85/94 79/95 83/100 77/95 75/81 77/100 71/93 73/87
81/73 75/47 80/68 73/50 89/93 70/72 85/86 75/74 88/78 62/69 79/100 67/53
19/0 6/0 8/0 0/0 31/27 10/10 34/29 10/10 34/25 15/23 7/21 13/7
39/46 33/45 32/20 58/50 29/27 34/37 27/21 30/28 28/16 85/46 29/29 20/47
12/0 8/3 12/4 0/0 5/1 4/2 5/1 1/0 9/0 8/0 0/0
4/0 11/3 4/4 4/0 9/8 8/5 9/8 6/2 6/3 0/0 14/14 7/13
27/23 14/3 28/4 12/0 44/34 20/11 32/9 21/20 31/28 15/8 21/0 20/7
0/8 3/6 12/16 8/8 15/4 11/5 7/2 12/3 19/6 31/15 14/0 7/7
19/19 58/33 28/16 46/31 21/10 27/11 26/13 24/17 38/13 38/15 21/0 27/0

Acknowledgments

We thank MeiLin Soong-Whitehead for her help with analyzing fungal samples, our other laboratory technicians for their help with data entry, the field investigators who submitted samples for analysis, and George Barron for valuable discussions.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Andersen, A. A. 1958. New sampler for the collection, sizing, and enumeration of viable airborne particles. J. Bacteriol. 76:471-484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beaumont, F., H. F. Kauffman, H. J. Sluiter, and K. de Vries. 1984. A volumetric-aerobiologic study of seasonal fungus prevalence inside and outside dwellings of asthmatic patients living in northeast Netherlands. Ann. Allergy 53:486-492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bush, R. K., and J. M. Portnoy. 2001. The role and abatement of fungal allergens in allergic diseases. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 107:430-440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1999. Report of the CDC Working Group on Pulmonary Hemorrhage/Hemosiderosis. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.
  • 5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2000. Update: pulmonary hemorrhage/hemosiderosis among infants—Cleveland, Ohio, 1993-1996. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 49:180-184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1999. Reports of members of the CDC external expert panel on acute idiopathic pulmonary hemorrhage in infants: a synthesis. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.
  • 7.Croft, W. A., B. B. Jarvis, and C. S. Yatawara. 1986. Airborne outbreak of trichothecene toxicosis. Atmos. Environ. 20:549-552. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dillon, H. K., P. A. Heinsohn, and J. D. Miller (ed.). 1996. Field guide for the determination of biological contaminants in environmental samples, p. 24, 57, and 58. American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax, Va.
  • 9.Epstein, C. E., and L. L. Fan. 2001. Alveolar hemorrhage syndromes: update on pulmonary hemosiderosis. J. Respir. Dis. Pediatr. 3:49-56. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Etzel, R. A., E. Montana, W. G. Sorenson, G. J. Kullman, T. A. Allan, and D. G. Dearborn. 1998. Acute pulmonary hemorrhage in infants associated with exposure to Stachybotrys atra and other fungi. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 152:757-762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Harrison, J., C. A. Pickering, E. B. Faragher, P. K. Austwick, S. A. Little, and L. Lawton. 1992. An investigation of the relationship between microbial and particulate indoor air pollution and the sick building syndrome. Respir. Med. 86:225-235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hirsch, R. S., and J. A. Sosman. 1976. A one-year survey of mold growth inside twelve homes. Ann. Allergy 36:30-38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hodgson, M. J., P. Morey, W.-Y. Leung, L. Morrow, D. Miller, B. B. Jarvis, H. Robbins, J. F. Halsey, and E. Storey. 1998. Building-associated pulmonary disease from exposure to Stachybotrys chartarum and Aspergillus versicolor. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 40:241-249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Johanning, E., R. Biagini, D. Hull, P. Morey, B. Jarvis, and P. Landsbergis. 1996. Health and immunology study following exposure to toxigenic fungi (Stachybotrys chartarum) in a water-damaged office environment. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 68:207-218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jones, B. L., and J. T. Cookson. 1983. Natural atmospheric microbial conditions in a typical suburban area. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45:919-934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kodama, A. M., and R. I. McGee. 1986. Airborne microbial contaminants in indoor environments. Naturally ventilated and air-conditioned homes. Arch. Environ. Health 41:306-311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kozak, P. P., J. Gallup, L. H. Cummins, and S. A. Gillman. 1979. Factors of importance in determining the prevalence of indoor molds. Ann. Allergy 43:88-94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li, C. S., and L. Y. Hsu. 1995. Fungus allergens inside and outside the residences of atopic and control children. Arch. Environ. Health 50:38-43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Macher, J. M., F. Y. Huang, and M. Flores. 1991. A two-year study of microbiological indoor air quality in a new apartment. Arch. Environ. Health 46:25-29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Martin, J. P. 1950. Use of acid, rose bengal, and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi. Soil Sci. 69:215-232. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pei-Chih, W., S. Huey-Jen, and L. Chia-Yin. 2000. Characteristics of indoor and outdoor airborne fungi at suburban and urban homes in two seasons. Sci. Total Environ. 253:111-118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ren, P., T. M. Jankun, and B. P. Leaderer. 1999. Comparisons of seasonal fungal prevalence in indoor and outdoor air and in house dusts of dwellings in one Northeast American county. J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 9:560-568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ren, P., T. M. Jankun, K. Belanger, M. B. Bracken, and B. P. Leaderer. 2001. The relation between fungal propagules in indoor air and home characteristics. Allergy 56:419-424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Solomon, W. R. 1975. Assessing fungus prevalence in domestic interiors. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 56:235-242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Solomon, W. R. 1976. A volumetric study of winter fungus prevalence in the air of Midwestern homes. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 57:46-55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Verhoeff, A. P., J. H. van Wijnen, B. Brunekreef, P. Fischer, E. van Reenen-Hoekstra, and R. A. Samson. 1992. Presence of viable mould propagules in indoor air in relation to damp and outdoor air. Allergy (Copenhagen) 47(2 part 1):83-91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wyngaarden, J. B., L. H. Smith, and J. C. Bennett (ed.). 1992. Cecil textbook of medicine, 19th ed., p. 399 and 407. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, Pa.

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES