Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1994 Mar;44(380):118–122.

Evaluation of the use of general practice age-sex registers in epidemiological research.

K Walsh 1
PMCID: PMC1238813  PMID: 8204319

Abstract

AIM. This study set out to show how well samples from general practice registers compare with census data, to describe those characteristics of the population and of the register that influence the response to postal surveys, and to demonstrate how general practice records can be used to assess non-response bias. METHOD. The data for this study were obtained from a large postal survey about low back pain among the general adult population aged 20-59 years in eight areas of the United Kingdom, using general practice age-sex registers as the sampling frame. RESULTS. The overall response rate was 59%. In the areas chosen, general practice registers yielded samples of size and age-sex composition close to that predicted from national census data. Responses were more likely to be obtained from women, from older age groups and from practices where the sample lists had been inspected for errors. The use of computerized registers and a letter of recommendation from the general practitioner had no effect on the response rate. Inspection of the general practice records of subsamples of respondents and non-respondents to determine consultation rates suggested that there was little response bias in respect of the subject of the survey. CONCLUSION. General practice registers can provide a suitable sampling frame for epidemiological purposes. Inaccuracies in the register can be reduced to some extent by careful inspection, but an irreducible minimum remain. Information held in general practice records can be useful in assessing response bias in health surveys.

Full text

PDF
118

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beardow R., Oerton J., Victor C. Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district. BMJ. 1989 Jul 8;299(6691):98–100. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6691.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowling A., Jacobson B. Screening: the inadequacy of population registers. BMJ. 1989 Mar 4;298(6673):545–546. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6673.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cartwright A. Some experiments with factors that might affect the response of mothers to a postal questionnaire. Stat Med. 1986 Nov-Dec;5(6):607–617. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780050608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fraser R. C., Clayton D. G. The accuracy of age-sex registers, practice medical records and family practitioner committee registers. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Jul;31(228):410–419. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fraser R. C. The reliability and validity of the age-sex register as a population denominator in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1978 May;28(190):283–286. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kaplan S., Cole P. Factors affecting response to postal questionnaires. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1970 Nov;24(4):245–247. doi: 10.1136/jech.24.4.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Little R. E., Davis A. K. Effectiveness of various methods of contact and reimbursement on response rates of pregnant women to a mail questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Jul;120(1):161–163. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Littlejohns P., Ebrahim S., Anderson R. Prevalence and diagnosis of chronic respiratory symptoms in adults. BMJ. 1989 Jun 10;298(6687):1556–1560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6687.1556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McEwen J., King E., Bickler G. Attendance and non-attendance for breast screening at the south east London breast screening service. BMJ. 1989 Jul 8;299(6691):104–106. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6691.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morrell D. C., Wale C. J. Symptoms perceived and recorded by patients. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1976 Jun;26(167):398–403. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roe L., Mant D., Coulter A. Screening: the inadequacy of population registers. BMJ. 1989 Apr 22;298(6680):1100–1100. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6680.1100-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ross S. K. Cervical cytology screening and government policy. BMJ. 1989 Jul 8;299(6691):101–104. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6691.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sheikh K., Mattingly S. Investigating non-response bias in mail surveys. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981 Dec;35(4):293–296. doi: 10.1136/jech.35.4.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sheldon M. G., Rector A. L., Barnes P. A. The accuracy of age-sex registers in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 May;34(262):269–271. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Silman A. J. Age-sex registers as a screening tool for general practice: size of the wrong address problem. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Aug 18;289(6442):415–416. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6442.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith W. C., Crombie I. K., Campion P. D., Knox J. D. Comparison of response rates to a postal questionnaire from a general practice and a research unit. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Nov 23;291(6507):1483–1485. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6507.1483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Spry V. M., Hovell M. F., Sallis J. G., Hofsteter C. R., Elder J. P., Molgaard C. A. Recruiting survey respondents to mailed surveys: controlled trials of incentives and prompts. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Jul;130(1):166–172. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Walker M., Shaper A. G., Cook D. G. Non-participation and mortality in a prospective study of cardiovascular disease. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1987 Dec;41(4):295–299. doi: 10.1136/jech.41.4.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. White M., Bhopal R. The politics of inadequate registers. BMJ. 1989 Aug 26;299(6698):567–567. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6698.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. White M. General practitioners' response to a postal questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1991 Aug 10;303(6798):367–367. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6798.367-b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES