Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1994 Aug;44(385):370–371.

Breast cancer: causes of patients' distress identified by qualitative analysis.

R V Jones 1, B Greenwood 1
PMCID: PMC1238956  PMID: 8068398

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Previous investigations of the psychological consequences of having breast cancer have usually involved quantitative analysis within medical models. AIM. This qualitative study set out to identify key events which had caused distress to women with breast cancer and to compare the frequency of these events with doctors' beliefs about their relative frequency. METHOD. The causes of distress in 26 women with breast cancer were identified by qualitative analysis of unstructured interviews. Subsequently, all hospital doctors and general practitioners in the Exeter health district were sent a list in random order of the eight events which had most commonly caused distress and were asked to rank them in order of frequency for patients with breast cancer. RESULTS. The responses suggest a mismatch between the doctors' expectations and the experience of the patients. CONCLUSION. Patients may suffer distress in areas of management doctors do not suspect are important; qualitative analysis can identify these areas.

Full text

PDF
370

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fallowfield L. J., Baum M., Maguire G. P. Effects of breast conservation on psychological morbidity associated with diagnosis and treatment of early breast cancer. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Nov 22;293(6558):1331–1334. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6558.1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fallowfield L. J., Hall A., Maguire G. P., Baum M. Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. BMJ. 1990 Sep 22;301(6752):575–580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6752.575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gantley M., Davies D. P., Murcott A. Sudden infant death syndrome: links with infant care practices. BMJ. 1993 Jan 2;306(6869):16–20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6869.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Greer S., Morris T., Pettingale K. W. Psychological response to breast cancer: effect on outcome. Lancet. 1979 Oct 13;2(8146):785–787. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)92127-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hughson A. V., Cooper A. F., McArdle C. S., Smith D. C. Psychosocial effects of radiotherapy after mastectomy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Jun 13;294(6586):1515–1518. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6586.1515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Maguire G. P., Lee E. G., Bevington D. J., Küchemann C. S., Crabtree R. J., Cornell C. E. Psychiatric problems in the first year after mastectomy. Br Med J. 1978 Apr 15;1(6118):963–965. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6118.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pope C., Mays N. Opening the black box: an encounter in the corridors of health services research. BMJ. 1993 Jan 30;306(6873):315–318. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6873.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES