Abstract
BACKGROUND. A four-partner, non-fundholding, urban practice with 6000 patients has since September 1991 worked closely with nine complementary practitioners working part time on a private, fee-paying basis. AIM. This study set out to describe and evaluate a model of integrating complementary practitioners into the primary health care team. METHOD. A description of the model operating in the practice was compiled. Qualitative analysis was carried out of semistructured interviews with all members of the primary health care team using the method of a cooperative enquiry. Retrospective quantitative data on patients attending complementary practitioners were also examined. RESULTS. The model allowed patients to refer themselves or be referred by a team member, encouraged communication between team members, and did not require any specific funding. After two years the model had been largely successful in preventing conflict over power, control and decision making; had maintained commitment to the idea of integrating complementary and allopathic medicine; and was self-funding. However, despite varied mechanisms set up to share knowledge and ideology, the rate of change in this area was slower than expected and referral rates were varied. The dilemma of charging patients for complementary medicine in an environment where health care is free emerged as a major concern among the doctors and practice staff. CONCLUSION. The method of cooperative inquiry allowed the whole team to gain an understanding of other viewpoints and to use the research to tackle the problems raised. This model could be adopted and used by any enthusiastic general practice.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson E., Anderson P. General practitioners and alternative medicine. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Feb;37(295):52–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Budd C., Fisher B., Parrinder D., Price L. A model of cooperation between complementary and allopathic medicine in a primary care setting. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Sep;40(338):376–378. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fulder S. J., Munro R. E. Complementary medicine in the United Kingdom: patients, practitioners, and consultations. Lancet. 1985 Sep 7;2(8454):542–545. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90473-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore J., Phipps K., Marcer D., Lewith G. Why do people seek treatment by alternative medicine? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Jan 5;290(6461):28–29. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6461.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray J., Shepherd S. Alternative or additional medicine? A new dilemma for the doctor. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Nov;38(316):511–514. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pietroni P. C. Beyond the boundaries: relationship between general practice and complementary medicine. BMJ. 1992 Sep 5;305(6853):564–566. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6853.564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reason P., Chase H. D., Desser A., Melhuish C., Morrison S., Peters D., Wallstein D., Webber V., Pietroni P. C. Towards a clinical framework for collaboration between general and complementary practitioners: discussion paper. J R Soc Med. 1992 Mar;85(3):161–164. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas K. J., Carr J., Westlake L., Williams B. T. Use of non-orthodox and conventional health care in Great Britain. BMJ. 1991 Jan 26;302(6770):207–210. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6770.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wharton R., Lewith G. Complementary medicine and the general practitioner. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Jun 7;292(6534):1498–1500. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6534.1498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]