Abstract
BACKGROUND. Although many patients are evaluated initially by their general practitioner, clinicians' accuracy at diagnosing organic gastrointestinal disease has not been studied in a primary care setting. Different spectra of severity of disease in general practice and hospital populations may lead to different values for diagnostic tests in these two populations. AIM. This study set out to determine the diagnostic value of history and physical and laboratory items for organic and neoplastic disease in general practice patients with nonacute abdominal complaints. METHOD. The one-year prospective, observational study was carried out in 1989 in 80 general practices in Limburg, the Netherlands. The study subjects were 933 patients (aged 18-75 years) presenting to their general practitioner with new non-acute abdominal complaints of minimum duration two weeks, and with whom the doctor had a diagnostic problem. Patients were physically examined by their general practitioner and asked to complete pre-structured questionnaires. Basic laboratory tests were carried out. Patients were followed up for at least one year by researchers and then a diagnosis was determined by an independent panel of three general practitioners using patient records, blinded for the results of the questionnaires. Sensitivity, specificity and odds ratios were calculated for clinical items. Stepwise forward logistic regression analysis was undertaken to identify independent predictors of organic gastrointestinal disease. RESULTS. Of the 933 patients 14% had organic gastrointestinal disease. No clinical item had both high sensitivity and specificity. Logistic regression analysis showed only eight independent predictors of organic disease: male sex, greater age, epigastric pain, no specific character to pain, pain affecting sleep, history of blood in stool, no pain relief after defecation and abnormal white blood cell count. When the model was programmed to predict neoplasms five items were found: male sex, greater age, no specific character to pain, weight loss and erythrocyte sedimentation rate greater than 20 mm hour-1. CONCLUSION. In a general practice population with non-acute abdominal complaints some clinical findings can be used as predictors for organic and neoplastic gastrointestinal disease.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fb53/8fb532d37c1ab715c882b9bf1411eb8b2e28cc70" alt="313"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/696f0/696f01fbe52ef21b661a37c45c4d4481c239b019" alt="314"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afbad/afbad3b670240463672050e8fd8baa16edfc49bd" alt="315"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/000fb/000fbe17f39ce640dc21ae1efc026b3192e3c9dd" alt="316"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Begg C. B. Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests. Stat Med. 1987 Jun;6(4):411–423. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knottnerus J. A., Leffers P. The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic tests. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;45(10):1143–1154. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90155-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kruis W., Thieme C., Weinzierl M., Schüssler P., Holl J., Paulus W. A diagnostic score for the irritable bowel syndrome. Its value in the exclusion of organic disease. Gastroenterology. 1984 Jul;87(1):1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manning A. P., Thompson W. G., Heaton K. W., Morris A. F. Towards positive diagnosis of the irritable bowel. Br Med J. 1978 Sep 2;2(6138):653–654. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6138.653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muris J. W., Starmans R., Pop P., Crebolder H. F., Knottnerus J. A. Discriminant value of symptoms in patients with dyspepsia. J Fam Pract. 1994 Feb;38(2):139–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muris J. W., Starmans R., Pop P., Crebolder H. F., Knottnerus J. A. The diagnostic value of symptoms for the identification of patients with an increased risk of colorectal disease. A criteria-based analysis. Fam Pract. 1992 Dec;9(4):415–420. doi: 10.1093/fampra/9.4.415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith R. C., Greenbaum D. S., Vancouver J. B., Henry R. C., Reinhart M. A., Greenbaum R. B., Dean H. A., Mayle J. E. Gender differences in Manning criteria in the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 1991 Mar;100(3):591–595. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)80002-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Talley N. J., Phillips S. F., Melton J., 3rd, Wiltgen C., Zinsmeister A. R. A patient questionnaire to identify bowel disease. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Oct 15;111(8):671–674. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-8-671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wasson J. H., Sox H. C., Jr, Sox C. H. The diagnosis of abdominal pain in ambulatory male patients. Med Decis Making. 1981;1(3):215–224. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8100100302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ZUNG W. W. A SELF-RATING DEPRESSION SCALE. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965 Jan;12:63–70. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]