Abstract
BACKGROUND. The introduction of quality assurance and medical audit has been an important development in general practice. However, the introduction of such programmes does not necessarily mean they are implemented by general practitioners. AIM. A study was undertaken to describe the problems and requirements perceived by general practitioners in relation to the implementation of quality assurance and medical audit in general practice. METHOD. Interviews were carried out with a stratified sample of 120 Dutch general practitioners. Knowledge, acceptance and application of quality assurance and medical audit activities were investigated, and perceived problems and requirements in implementing quality assurance and audit activities were explored. RESULTS. General practitioners in the Netherlands were generally positive towards quality assurance activities, but had little experience of carrying out such activities. The most frequently mentioned obstacles to implementing quality assurance activities concerned lack of time, colleagues' negative attitudes and fear of assessment and criticism by colleagues. Requirements for implementing quality assurance included having regular meetings with colleagues about quality assurance, having information on the aims and methods of quality assurance, having data from other practices with which to compare performance, having support in data collection, in audit in the practice and in setting up local peer review, and having financial support. The most important factor predicting the actual application of quality assurance activities was found to be knowledge of specific quality assurance activities. CONCLUSION. Well-designed programmes for the implementation of quality assurance and medical audit, using a variety of different interventions, have to be developed. Such programmes should include the training of professionals in the concepts and methods of quality assurance as well as the provision of financial support for quality assurance activities.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Black N., Thompson E. Obstacles to medical audit: British doctors speak. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Apr;36(7):849–856. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90077-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grol R. Implementing guidelines in general practice care. Qual Health Care. 1992 Sep;1(3):184–191. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.3.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grol R. National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Sep;40(338):361–364. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grol R. Peer review in primary care. Qual Assur Health Care. 1990;2(2):119–126. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/2.2.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grol R. Quality improvement by peer review in primary care: a practical guide. Qual Health Care. 1994 Sep;3(3):147–152. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.3.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrison J. M., Sullivan F. M. Audit: teaching medical students in general practice. Med Educ. 1993 Nov;27(6):495–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1993.tb00310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newton J., Hutchinson A., Steen N., Russell I., Haimes E. Educational potential of medical audit: observations from a study of small groups setting standards. Qual Health Care. 1992 Dec;1(4):256–259. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.4.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steven I. D., Andersen N. A., Esterman A. J. Are general practitioners in favour of quality assurance? Aust Fam Physician. 1989 Mar;18(3):276–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webb S. J., Dowell A. C., Heywood P. Survey of general practice audit in Leeds. BMJ. 1991 Feb 16;302(6773):390–392. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6773.390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wensing M., Grol R. Single and combined strategies for implementing changes in primary care: a literature review. Int J Qual Health Care. 1994 Jun;6(2):115–132. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/6.2.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]