Abstract
BACKGROUND: Family therapy and the ideas that underlie it have not had much impact on general practice, although there is good reason to think this could be a useful approach. AIM: As a group of general practitioners (and a practice nurse) with experience of family therapy, we were interested in demonstrating whether family therapy methods could usefully inform general practice consultations. METHOD: Two surgeries were observed by the general practitioner's colleagues. RESULTS: Selected cases are discussed to illustrate the impact of the use of family therapy ideas and a reflecting colleague or team. CONCLUSIONS: Family therapy ideas can be a helpful framework within which to think about both demanding and ordinary consultations. Inviting a colleague to contribute respectfully could be useful both as a method of teaching, and in resolving difficult or faltering consultations.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cecchin G. Hypothesizing, circularity, and neutrality revisited: an invitation to curiosity. Fam Process. 1987 Dec;26(4):405–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1987.00405.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deys C., Dowling E., Golding V. Clinical psychology: a consultative approach in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Aug;39(325):342–344. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graham H., Senior R., Lazarus M., Mayer R., Asen K. Family therapy in general practice: views of referrers and clients. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Jan;42(354):25–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Selvini M. P., Boscolo L., Cecchin G., Prata G. Hypothesizing--circularity--neutrality: three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Fam Process. 1980 Mar;19(1):3–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1980.00003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]