Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
editorial
. 1996 May;46(406):268–270.

Experts and evidence.

R J Taylor
PMCID: PMC1239632  PMID: 8762740

Full text

PDF
268

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman D. G. The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ. 1994 Jan 29;308(6924):283–284. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Antman E. M., Lau J., Kupelnick B., Mosteller F., Chalmers T. C. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992 Jul 8;268(2):240–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bulpitt C. J. Meta-analysis. Lancet. 1988 Jul 9;2(8602):93–94. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90017-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chalmers I., Dickersin K., Chalmers T. C. Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane's agenda. BMJ. 1992 Oct 3;305(6857):786–788. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6857.786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charlton B. G. Medical practice and the double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Sep;41(350):355–356. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eisenberg L. Science in medicine: too much or too little and too limited in scope? Am J Med. 1988 Mar;84(3 Pt 1):483–491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Godlee F. The Cochrane collaboration. BMJ. 1994 Oct 15;309(6960):969–970. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6960.969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haynes R. B. Loose connections between peer-reviewed clinical journals and clinical practice. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Nov 1;113(9):724–728. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-9-724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huth E. J. The underused medical literature. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Jan 15;110(2):99–100. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-110-2-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LaPorte R. E. Global public health and the information superhighway. BMJ. 1994 Jun 25;308(6945):1651–1652. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6945.1651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Logan R. L., Scott P. J. Uncertainty in clinical practice: implications for quality and costs of health care. Lancet. 1996 Mar 2;347(9001):595–598. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91284-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Marmot M. G. Epidemiology and the art of the soluble. Lancet. 1986 Apr 19;1(8486):897–900. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90998-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McCormick J. The place of judgement in medicine. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Feb;44(379):50–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mulrow C. D. The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Mar;106(3):485–488. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Naylor C. D. Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995 Apr 1;345(8953):840–842. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92969-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rothwell P. M. Can overall results of clinical trials be applied to all patients? Lancet. 1995 Jun 24;345(8965):1616–1619. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90120-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sackett D. L. Second thoughts. Proposals for the health sciences--I. Compulsory retirement for experts. J Chronic Dis. 1983;36(7):545–547. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(83)90132-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith B. H., Taylor R. J. Medicine--a healing or a dying art? Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Apr;46(405):249–251. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith R. Problems with peer review and alternatives. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Mar 12;296(6624):774–777. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6624.774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith R. Promoting research into peer review. BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):143–144. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6948.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith R. Where is the wisdom...? BMJ. 1991 Oct 5;303(6806):798–799. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6806.798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES