Full text
PDF


Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Altman D. G. The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ. 1994 Jan 29;308(6924):283–284. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Antman E. M., Lau J., Kupelnick B., Mosteller F., Chalmers T. C. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992 Jul 8;268(2):240–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bulpitt C. J. Meta-analysis. Lancet. 1988 Jul 9;2(8602):93–94. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90017-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chalmers I., Dickersin K., Chalmers T. C. Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane's agenda. BMJ. 1992 Oct 3;305(6857):786–788. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6857.786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlton B. G. Medical practice and the double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Sep;41(350):355–356. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eisenberg L. Science in medicine: too much or too little and too limited in scope? Am J Med. 1988 Mar;84(3 Pt 1):483–491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Godlee F. The Cochrane collaboration. BMJ. 1994 Oct 15;309(6960):969–970. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6960.969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haynes R. B. Loose connections between peer-reviewed clinical journals and clinical practice. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Nov 1;113(9):724–728. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-9-724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huth E. J. The underused medical literature. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Jan 15;110(2):99–100. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-110-2-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LaPorte R. E. Global public health and the information superhighway. BMJ. 1994 Jun 25;308(6945):1651–1652. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6945.1651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Logan R. L., Scott P. J. Uncertainty in clinical practice: implications for quality and costs of health care. Lancet. 1996 Mar 2;347(9001):595–598. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91284-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marmot M. G. Epidemiology and the art of the soluble. Lancet. 1986 Apr 19;1(8486):897–900. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90998-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCormick J. The place of judgement in medicine. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Feb;44(379):50–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mulrow C. D. The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Mar;106(3):485–488. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naylor C. D. Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995 Apr 1;345(8953):840–842. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92969-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rothwell P. M. Can overall results of clinical trials be applied to all patients? Lancet. 1995 Jun 24;345(8965):1616–1619. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90120-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sackett D. L. Second thoughts. Proposals for the health sciences--I. Compulsory retirement for experts. J Chronic Dis. 1983;36(7):545–547. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(83)90132-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith B. H., Taylor R. J. Medicine--a healing or a dying art? Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Apr;46(405):249–251. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith R. Problems with peer review and alternatives. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Mar 12;296(6624):774–777. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6624.774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith R. Promoting research into peer review. BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):143–144. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6948.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith R. Where is the wisdom...? BMJ. 1991 Oct 5;303(6806):798–799. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6806.798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
