Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1996 Jul;46(408):415–418.

Women's experiences of general practitioner management of their vaginal symptoms.

T C O'Dowd 1, S Parker 1, A Kelly 1
PMCID: PMC1239694  PMID: 8776913

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the management of vaginal symptoms despite their frequency. Most vaginal symptoms in non-menopausal women are managed as thrush, although bacterial vaginosis is commoner. AIM: The aim of this study was to measure the experiences of women attending their general practitioner with vaginal symptoms including self-reporting of symptoms, duration and severity, informal support, over-the-counter remedies, sources of information, gender of doctor, expected and actual vaginal examination, and explanations and knowledge of common vaginal infections. METHOD: A postal questionnaire survey was conducted of 490 patients presenting with vaginal symptoms aged between 18 and 48 years who had attended 10 general practices within the previous 3 months in the East Midlands of England. RESULTS: A total of 85% of patients had suffered a previous episode, with 39% having had three or more infections in the previous year. Overall, 68% consult with each episode, and most consult within 7 days of onset of symptoms (median = 4 days). In all, 68% discussed their symptoms with partners, families or friends, but 32% relied solely on their doctor. Some 33% bought over-the-counter remedies. A total of 65% informed themselves further from encyclopaedias, leaflets and women's magazines, but there was a strong request for more information. Out of those questioned, 75% expected a vaginal examination, whereas 57% had such an examination performed. Most were told their symptoms were caused by thrush (78%), but patients' ideas on causation were varied. Most believed sexual transmission played a role in transmission of symptoms. Women were socially embarrassed by their symptoms, with 46% admitting to having the condition on their minds all or most of the time. Twenty-eight per cent of women wished to see a female doctor, with gender being unimportant to the remainder. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal symptoms were commonly recurrent, socially embarrassing and managed as candidiasis. Just over half the patients had a vaginal examination. There is a shortage of suitable information on vaginal infections available to patients, many of whom used over-the-counter medications.

Full text

PDF
415

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blackwell A. L., Fox A. R., Phillips I., Barlow D. Anaerobic vaginosis (non-specific vaginitis): clinical, microbiological, and therapeutic findings. Lancet. 1983 Dec 17;2(8364):1379–1382. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90920-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bosanquet N., Leese B. Family doctors and innovation in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Jun 4;296(6636):1576–1580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6636.1576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Donabedian A. The Lichfield Lecture. Quality assurance in health care: consumers' role. Qual Health Care. 1992 Dec;1(4):247–251. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.4.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Easmon C. S., Hay P. E., Ison C. A. Bacterial vaginosis: a diagnostic approach. Genitourin Med. 1992 Apr;68(2):134–138. doi: 10.1136/sti.68.2.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hillier S. L., Martius J., Krohn M., Kiviat N., Holmes K. K., Eschenbach D. A. A case-control study of chorioamnionic infection and histologic chorioamnionitis in prematurity. N Engl J Med. 1988 Oct 13;319(15):972–978. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198810133191503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hillier S. L., Nugent R. P., Eschenbach D. A., Krohn M. A., Gibbs R. S., Martin D. H., Cotch M. F., Edelman R., Pastorek J. G., 2nd, Rao A. V. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 28;333(26):1737–1742. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512283332604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hillier S., Krohn M. A., Watts D. H., Wolner-Hanssen P., Eschenbach D. Microbiologic efficacy of intravaginal clindamycin cream for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;76(3 Pt 1):407–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Larsson P. G., Platz-Christensen J. J., Thejls H., Forsum U., Påhlson C. Incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease after first-trimester legal abortion in women with bacterial vaginosis after treatment with metronidazole: a double-blind, randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jan;166(1 Pt 1):100–103. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91838-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Martius J., Krohn M. A., Hillier S. L., Stamm W. E., Holmes K. K., Eschenbach D. A. Relationships of vaginal Lactobacillus species, cervical Chlamydia trachomatis, and bacterial vaginosis to preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jan;71(1):89–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nugent R. P., Krohn M. A., Hillier S. L. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Feb;29(2):297–301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.297-301.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. O'Dowd T. C., West R. R., Ribeiro C. D., Smail J. E., Munro J. A. Contribution of Gardnerella vaginalis to vaginitis in a general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Jun 21;292(6536):1640–1642. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6536.1640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schmitt C., Sobel J. D., Meriwether C. Bacterial vaginosis: treatment with clindamycin cream versus oral metronidazole. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jun;79(6):1020–1023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tooley P. Management of vaginal candidosis: a survey in general practice. Practitioner. 1990 May 22;234(1489):519-20, 522. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Watts D. H., Krohn M. A., Hillier S. L., Eschenbach D. A. Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for post-cesarean endometritis. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jan;75(1):52–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES