Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines are being developed for a variety of reasons. To date, there has been little investigation of the perspectives of those who are recommended to use them. AIM: The survey reported here set out to investigate how familiar general practitioners are with a range of published guidelines, to assess whether they have used them, and to describe their attitudes to the guidelines and the methods of implementing them. METHOD: A postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 559 general practitioners in the North and Yorkshire region in March 1995. Questions were organized around the topics of: knowledge; use; practice change; beliefs; pressure felt to use the guidelines; and methods of implementation. Basic classificatory data on gender; year of qualification; partnership and fundholding status were also collected. RESULTS: Replies were received from 300 doctors (54%). Knowledge and use of the three selected guidelines varied, but was generally towards the 'high' end of the scale. Doctors showed a high degree of homogeneity in their attitudes to guidelines, which were generally positive. Only single-handed practitioners varied from this pattern of responses. Most of the pressure to use the guidelines was felt to come from the Department of Health, and the least pressure from patients. Doctors felt that the methods of implementation that involved them in educational events and discussion with colleagues were most likely to have an impact on them. CONCLUSION: General practitioners are receptive to guideline initiatives, and their views are in line with existing or proposed implementation strategies. More investigation of the concept of 'use' is needed.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bosanquet N., Leese B. Family doctors and innovation in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Jun 4;296(6636):1576–1580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6636.1576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eddy D. M. The challenge. JAMA. 1990 Jan 12;263(2):287–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giraud A. Uncertainty in medicine: can it be reduced? Qual Health Care. 1992 Sep;1(3):150–151. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.3.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grimshaw J., Freemantle N., Wallace S., Russell I., Hurwitz B., Watt I., Long A., Sheldon T. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):55–64. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grol R. Implementing guidelines in general practice care. Qual Health Care. 1992 Sep;1(3):184–191. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.3.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grol R. National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Sep;40(338):361–364. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klazinga N. Compliance with practice guidelines: clinical autonomy revisited. Health Policy. 1994 Mar;28(1):51–66. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(94)90020-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siriwardena A. N. Clinical guidelines in primary care: a survey of general practitioners' attitudes and behaviour. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Dec;45(401):643–647. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tunis S. R., Hayward R. S., Wilson M. C., Rubin H. R., Bass E. B., Johnston M., Steinberg E. P. Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jun 1;120(11):956–963. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-11-199406010-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]