Abstract
BACKGROUND: The consultation has been widely examined, but chiefly from the doctor's standpoint. Comparatively little is known about how patients view the event even though shared understanding is an accepted goal of each consultation. AIM: The aim of the study was to describe the range and types of thoughts which patients have during their consultations. METHOD: In semistructured interviews, prompted by video playback and transcript, 18 patients gave detailed accounts of their thoughts and feelings during a recent consultation. RESULTS: The study confirmed patients' central desire for understanding but also revealed a complex mix of other thoughts. Multiple problems and aims were usual. Patients routinely considered their relationship with the doctor, the doctor's willingness, ability and available time, and altered their behaviour accordingly. CONCLUSION: Patients and doctors have different models of the consultation-better understanding of how patients consult should lead to better training for doctors and improve shared understanding.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Arborelius E., Timpka T. General practitioners' comments on video recorded consultations as an aid to understanding the doctor-patient relationship. Fam Pract. 1990 Jun;7(2):84–90. doi: 10.1093/fampra/7.2.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arborelius E., Timpka T. In what way may videotapes be used to get significant information about the patient-physician relationship? Med Teach. 1990;12(2):197–208. doi: 10.3109/01421599009006697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Britten N., Jones R., Murphy E., Stacy R. Qualitative research methods in general practice and primary care. Fam Pract. 1995 Mar;12(1):104–114. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.1.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Butler N. M., Campion P. D., Cox A. D. Exploration of doctor and patient agendas in general practice consultations. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Nov;35(9):1145–1155. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90227-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cole-Kelly K. Illness stories and patient care in the family practice context. Fam Med. 1992 Jan;24(1):45–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans D. A., Block M. R., Steinberg E. R., Penrose A. M. Frames and heuristics in doctor-patient discourse. Soc Sci Med. 1986;22(10):1027–1034. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90203-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fitzpatrick R. Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations. BMJ. 1991 Apr 13;302(6781):887–889. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6781.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Locker D., Dunt D. Theoretical and methodological issues in sociological studies of consumer satisfaction with medical care. Soc Sci Med. 1978 Jul;12(4A):283–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roter D. L., Hall J. A. Studies of doctor-patient interaction. Annu Rev Public Health. 1989;10:163–180. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.10.050189.001115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simpson M., Buckman R., Stewart M., Maguire P., Lipkin M., Novack D., Till J. Doctor-patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement. BMJ. 1991 Nov 30;303(6814):1385–1387. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6814.1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stott N. C., Davis R. H. The exceptional potential in each primary care consultation. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1979 Apr;29(201):201–205. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams S. J., Calnan M. Key determinants of consumer satisfaction with general practice. Fam Pract. 1991 Sep;8(3):237–242. doi: 10.1093/fampra/8.3.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zola I. K. Pathways to the doctor-from person to patient. Soc Sci Med. 1973 Sep;7(9):677–689. doi: 10.1016/0037-7856(73)90002-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]