Abstract
Background: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an emerging global health concern that commonly occurs in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, there is limited literature on the epidemiology of NAFLD among adults with T2DM in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study is aimed at assessing the prevalence of NAFLD and its associated factors in patients with T2DM attending Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Methods: An institution-based, cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were collected using a pretested, structured data collection tool. All eligible consecutive patients diagnosed with T2DM were enrolled in this study. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel 2016 and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 26. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify associations between dependent and independent variables by calculating odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: A total of 211 patients were enrolled in the study. Females (108; 51.2%) slightly predominated, and the mean (standard deviation) age of patients was 56.2 (11.0) years. Fatty liver was detected in 102 patients, representing a prevalence of 48.3% (95% CI: 42%–55%). Mild, moderate, and severe NAFLD accounted for 19.0%, 24.6%, and 4.7%, respectively. Female sex (AOR = 2.27 [95% CI: 1.17, 4.41]), obesity (AOR = 6.13 [95% CI: 2.15, 17.46]), borderline serum triglyceride levels (AOR = 3.22 [95% CI: 1.36, 7.58]), and high serum triglyceride levels (AOR = 2.29 [95% CI: 1.03, 5.10]) were significantly associated with the presence of NAFLD.
Conclusions: NAFLD is highly prevalent among patients with T2DM in this Ethiopian cohort. Female sex, obesity, and elevated serum triglyceride levels are significant risk factors. These findings highlight the urgent need to address the silent epidemic of NAFLD among adults with T2DM in Ethiopia and emphasize the importance of educating patients on adopting healthy lifestyles to reduce the incidence of this condition.
Keywords: Ethiopia, magnitude, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, Type 2 diabetes mellitus
1. Introduction
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterized by the presence of excessive fat accumulation in the liver parenchyma, identified either through imaging or histological examination, in the absence of alternative causes such as significant alcohol consumption, steatogenic medications, or other medical conditions [1–3]. Histologically, NAFLD represents a spectrum of disease ranging from simple steatosis to more advanced forms involving hepatic complications such as hepatitis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and, in some cases, hepatocellular carcinoma [4, 5]. In the diabetic population, NAFLD is alternatively termed metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), defined by evidence of hepatic steatosis along with one of the following: overweight/obesity, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), or metabolic dysregulation [6].
NAFLD is further classified into nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NAFL is characterized by ≥ 5% hepatic steatosis without evidence of hepatocellular injury, such as hepatocyte ballooning. In contrast, NASH is a distinct subtype marked by ≥ 5% hepatic steatosis accompanied by inflammation and hepatocyte injury, including ballooning, with or without fibrosis [7].
As a standalone clinicopathological entity, NAFLD has emerged as a significant public health concern [8, 9], affecting approximately one-quarter of the global population [10, 11]. Its prevalence varies geographically, with the highest rates observed in the Middle East (32%), followed by South America (30%), Asia (27%), North America (24%), Europe (24%), and Africa (13%) [12, 13]. Moreover, its prevalence has risen dramatically over recent years, making it the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide [4, 8, 14].
The global prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) has reached pandemic levels, affecting 10.5% (536.6 million) of the world's population in 2021, with projections estimating an increase to 12.2% (783.2 million) by 2045 [15]. T2DM accounts for over 90% of all DM cases [16]. Reflecting this global trend, the prevalence of T2DM in Ethiopia is also notably high, affecting 6.5% of the population [17]. NAFLD is strongly associated with T2DM [18, 19], resulting in a substantially higher prevalence of NAFLD among diabetic patients compared to the general population [20]. The coexistence of NAFLD and T2DM often leads to synergistic effects that complicate clinical management and worsen outcomes [21].
Various factors have contributed to the dramatic global rise in T2DM incidence and prevalence [15, 22]. This escalating health crisis significantly impacts both lifespan and quality of life [23]. Particularly concerning is the burden of T2DM in low- and middle-income countries, where suboptimal glycemic control remains widespread [22, 24].
The growing impact of T2DM is especially pronounced in sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia [25], where healthcare systems face challenges such as limited availability and affordability of medications, shortages of trained healthcare professionals, and overall inadequate infrastructure [26].
With the increasing prevalence of diabetes and obesity, the incidence of NAFLD and its complications is expected to rise correspondingly [10, 11, 27, 28]. NAFLD has become a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with T2DM due to hepatic complications like cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as extrahepatic conditions including cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, colorectal cancer, endocrinopathies, and osteoporosis [5, 29]. Additionally, NAFLD imposes a substantial and growing economic burden, with estimated annual costs reaching $103 billion in the United States alone [30].
The prevalence of NAFLD is often underestimated because it is typically asymptomatic and frequently overlooked in clinical practice [31, 32]. In African populations, data on the burden and spectrum of NAFLD among high-risk groups remain scarce [33]. This gap is evident in Ethiopia, where no specific NAFLD-related guidelines exist, and over half (55.3%) of chronic liver diseases are of cryptogenic origin [34]. NAFLD is also a primary cause of unexplained elevated liver enzymes in this setting [35]. Given this context, the present study was conducted to assess the prevalence of NAFLD and its associated factors in patients with T2DM at the Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College (Y12HMC), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Setting, Design, and Period
This institution-based, cross-sectional study was conducted at the medical referral and outpatient unit of Y12HMC in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Y12HMC is a tertiary public hospital that provides a wide range of clinical services. The medical referral and outpatient unit offers specialized care to more than 2000 patients diagnosed with T2DM. This unit delivers comprehensive diabetic care and is staffed by subspecialists, resident physicians, general practitioners, and trained nurses. Data collection for the study took place from November 1, 2023, to February 29, 2024.
2.2. Population
The source population for this study included all patients with T2DM who had regular follow-up at Y12HMC in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The study population consisted of consecutively selected T2DM patients attending regular follow-up at the medical referral and outpatient units of the hospital who met the eligibility criteria. Inclusion criteria were adults aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with T2DM by their treating physician, and under regular follow-up for at least 2 months at the time of data collection. Exclusion criteria included patients with a self-reported history of excessive alcohol consumption; documented viral, alcoholic, drug-induced, or autoimmune hepatitis; chronic liver disease; use of steatogenic drugs (such as tamoxifen, amiodarone, or methotrexate) within the past 3 months; thyroid dysfunction; hyperuricemia or gout; gestational diabetes; chronic kidney disease; and pregnancy.
2.3. Sample Size Determination and Sampling Technique
The sample size was determined a priori using Tabachnick and Fidell's formula, which recommends a minimum of 50 plus eight times the number of independent variables (i.e., participants > 50 + 8 × independent variables) [36]. Based on 19 variables previously associated with NAFLD in patients with T2DM, this calculation indicated a minimum sample size of 202 participants.
Although 2000 adult T2DM patients were being followed at referral clinics, only about 300 were expected to attend during the study period. Given the likelihood of substantial exclusions due to strict eligibility criteria, the researchers adopted a consecutive enrollment strategy to maximize statistical power by including all eligible participants.
2.4. Data Collection and Variables
In this study, the presence of NAFLD was designated as the dependent variable. The independent variables included a range of clinicodemographic factors: age, sex, place of residence, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, duration of diabetes, and hypertension status. Additional independent variables encompassed biochemical and pharmacological characteristics, such as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose levels, liver and lipid biochemistry, and the use of lipid-lowering agents, antihypertensive medications, and antidiabetic treatments.
Data were extracted from electronic medical records (EMRs) using a structured tool adapted from prior studies [37–39]. Trained nurses collected anthropometric measurements, including BMI (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), during clinic visits. For cases with incomplete records, patients were contacted virtually and instructed to fast prior to their scheduled laboratory or imaging appointments. Two healthcare professionals underwent standardized training to ensure strict adherence to the study protocol.
2.5. Data Quality Management
To ensure high data quality, the data collection tool was developed through an iterative refinement process. Its design was informed by a comprehensive review of relevant literature and related studies [32, 37–39]. A pretest involving 32 patients was conducted, leading to necessary adjustments to the tool. Prior to data collection, two data collectors received targeted training on the tool's fundamentals and ethical considerations. Throughout the data collection phase, the principal investigator provided continuous supervision to ensure completeness, clarity, and accuracy of the data. Completed checklists were audited daily for consistency and completeness, with any ambiguous or incomplete entries excluded from the final analysis.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Data entry, coding, and cleaning were conducted using Microsoft Excel 2016. The cleaned dataset was subsequently exported to the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States) for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize basic patient characteristics. Binary logistic regression was performed to examine associations between variables. Variables with a p value ≤ 0.25 in the bivariable logistic regression were included in the multivariable logistic regression model to calculate adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Model fit was assessed using the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Variables with p values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
2.7. Operational Definitions
NAFLD was defined based on the degree of liver stiffness or steatosis as measured by ultrasonography or previously documented abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans or FibroScan [40]. Grade 1 (mild) represented a light increase in liver echogenicity with normal visualization of intrahepatic vessels and no posterior acoustic attenuation, involving 5%–33% of hepatocytes. Grade 2 (moderate) was defined by a moderate increase in liver echogenicity, partial obscuration of vessels, and early posterior acoustic attenuation, affecting 34%–66% of hepatocytes. Grade 3 (severe) denoted a diffuse increase in echogenicity, absence of visible vessels, and marked posterior acoustic attenuation, with more than 66% of hepatocytes involved [40, 41].
3. Results
3.1. Background Characteristics of the Study Patients
A total of 211 patients with T2DM who regularly attended the medical outpatient clinic at Y12HMC in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, were included in this study. Females slightly outnumbered males, comprising 108 participants (51.2%). The patients' ages ranged from 30 to 89 years, with a mean (± standard deviation) of 56.2 ± 11.0 years. More than two-thirds of the participants (142; 67.3%) were over 50 years old at the time of the study. Nearly all patients (210; 99.5%) were residents of Addis Ababa. Regarding BMI, 91 patients (48.8%) had a normal BMI, while 85 (40.8%) were classified as overweight. Only three patients (1.4%) reported being smokers (Table 1).
Table 1.
Background characteristics of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus having regular follow-up at Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (n = 211).
Variable | Frequency | Percent (%) |
---|---|---|
Age category | ||
≤ 40 years | 20 | 9.5 |
41–50 years | 49 | 23.2 |
51–60 years | 72 | 34.1 |
> 60 years | 70 | 33.2 |
Mean (standard deviation) | 56.2 (11.0) | |
Sex | ||
Male | 103 | 48.8 |
Female | 108 | 51.2 |
Body mass index | ||
Normal (18.5–24.9) | 91 | 43.1 |
Overweight (25–29.9) | 85 | 40.8 |
Obese (≥ 30) | 34 | 16.1 |
Cigarette smoking | ||
Yes | 3 | 1.4 |
No | 208 | 98.6 |
3.2. Clinical and Pharmacological Details of Study Patients
With respect to the clinical profile of the studied patients, 91 (43.1%) had a disease duration ranging from 5 to 10 years, while 82 (38.9%) had a disease duration of less than 5 years. More than two-thirds (144, 68.2%) were taking oral hypoglycemic agents, whereas 41 (19.4%) were on both injectable insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents. Metformin monotherapy was prescribed to 75 (35.5%) patients, while 64 (30.3%) were receiving a combination of metformin and sulfonylurea. Additionally, 117 (55.5%) of the patients were hypertensive, with 115 (54.5%) receiving antihypertensive medications. The majority (117, 55.5%) were also taking lipid-lowering agents (Table 2).
Table 2.
Clinical and pharmacological characteristics of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus having regular follow-up at Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (n = 211).
Variable | Frequency | Percent (%) |
---|---|---|
Disease duration | ||
< 5 years | 82 | 38.9 |
5–10 years | 91 | 43.1 |
> 10 years | 38 | 18.0 |
Antidiabetic agent route | ||
Orals | 144 | 68.2 |
Injectable | 26 | 12.3 |
Both | 41 | 19.4 |
Antidiabetic agent | ||
Metformin | 75 | 35.5 |
Metformin + sulfonylureas | 64 | 30.3 |
Metformin + insulin | 26 | 12.3 |
Insulin | 38 | 18.0 |
Metformin + sulfonylureas + SGLT2i | 4 | 1.9 |
Metformin + SGLT2i | 4 | 1.9 |
History of hypertension | ||
Yes | 117 | 55.5 |
No | 94 | 44.5 |
Antihypertensive medication | ||
Yes | 115 | 54.5 |
No | 96 | 45.5 |
Lipid-lowering agent | ||
Yes | 117 | 55.5 |
No | 94 | 44.5 |
Abbreviation: SGLT2i, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor.
3.3. Biochemical Details of Study Patients
Then, 72 patients (34.1%) achieved optimal glycemic control, with preprandial blood glucose levels within the target range of 80–130 mg/dL. Among the 75 patients with recorded HbA1c levels from the preceding 3 months, 61 (81.3%) exhibited elevated values (Table 3).
Table 3.
Biochemical details of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus having regular follow-up at Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (n = 211).
Variable | Frequency | Percent (%) |
---|---|---|
Preprandial blood glucose | ||
80–130 mg/dL | 72 | 34.1 |
> 130 mg/dL | 139 | 65.9 |
Glycated hemoglobin (n = 75) | ||
< 7% | 14 | 18.7 |
≥ 7% | 61 | 81.3 |
Alanine transaminase (ALT) | ||
Normal | 170 | 80.6 |
Elevated | 41 | 19.4 |
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) | ||
Normal | 186 | 88.2 |
Elevated | 25 | 11.8 |
AST-to-ALT ratio | ||
≤ 1 | 118 | 55.9 |
> 1 | 93 | 44.1 |
Total bilirubin | ||
Normal | 204 | 96.7 |
Elevated | 7 | 3.3 |
Direct bilirubin | ||
Normal | 160 | 75.8 |
Elevated | 51 | 24.2 |
Total cholesterol | ||
Normal | 175 | 82.9 |
Borderline | 20 | 9.5 |
High | 16 | 7.6 |
HDL cholesterol | ||
Normal | 56 | 26.5 |
Abnormal | 155 | 73.5 |
LDL cholesterol | ||
Normal | 79 | 37.4 |
Elevated | 132 | 62.6 |
Triglyceride cholesterol | ||
Normal | 105 | 49.8 |
Borderline | 43 | 20.4 |
High | 63 | 29.9 |
Abbreviations: HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.
Elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were observed in 25 patients each (11.8% for both), with an AST-to-ALT ratio > 1 in 93 patients (44.1%). While total bilirubin was elevated in seven (3.3%) of the patients, about one-fourth (n = 51, 24.2%) of the patients had elevated direct bilirubin levels. The serum levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides were highly elevated in 16 (7.6%) and 63 (29.9%) of the patients, respectively. Besides, high-density lipoprotein was low in 155 (73.5%), and low-density lipoprotein was elevated in 132 (62.6%) of the patients (Table 3).
3.4. Magnitude of NAFLD Among the Study Patients
In this study, the magnitude of NAFLD among patients with T2DM was 48.3% (95% CI: 42%–55%). Specifically, 52 patients (24.6%) exhibited moderate NAFLD, while 40 patients (19.0%) had mild NAFLD. In contrast, only 10 patients (4.7%) were found to have severe NAFLD based on ultrasonographic findings (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Magnitude of NAFLD among patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus having regular follow-up at Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (n = 211).
3.5. Factors Associated With NAFLD
After controlling for variables with p < 0.25 in bivariable regression, this study found that women had higher odds of developing NAFLD compared to men (AOR = 2.27 [95% CI: 1.17, 4.41]). Similarly, obese patients (BMI ≥ 30) were significantly more likely to have NAFLD than those with a normal BMI (AOR = 6.13 [95% CI: 2.15, 17.46]). Additionally, patients with borderline or high serum triglyceride levels were more likely to have NAFLD than those with normal triglyceride levels, with adjusted odds ratios of 3.22 (95% CI: 1.36, 7.58) and 2.29 (95% CI: 1.03, 5.10), respectively. The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test demonstrated adequate model fit (p = 0.300), indicating no significant deviation between observed and predicted outcomes (Table 4).
Table 4.
Factors associated with NAFLD among patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus having regular follow-up at Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Variable | NAFLD | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Present | Absent | ||||
Sex | |||||
Male | 39 (37.9) | 64 (62.1) | 1 | 1 | — |
Female | 63 (58.3) | 45 (41.7) | 2.30 (1.32, 3.99) | 2.27 (1.17, 4.41)∗ | 0.016 |
Age category | |||||
≤ 40 years | 12 (60.0) | 8 (40.0) | 2.39 (0.86, 6.60) | 1.95 (0.56, 6.77) | 0.291 |
41–50 years | 27 (55.1) | 22 (44.9) | 1.96 (0.93, 4.10) | 1.34 (0.54, 3.37) | 0.527 |
51–60 years | 36 (50.0) | 36 (50.0) | 1.59 (0.82, 3.10) | 1.61 (0.74, 3.51) | 0.227 |
> 60 years | 27 (38.6) | 43 (61.4) | 1 | 1 | — |
Body mass index | |||||
18.5–24.9 | 35 (38.5) | 56 (61.5) | 1 | 1 | — |
25–29.9 | 43 (50.0) | 43 (50.0) | 1.60 (0.88, 2.91) | 1.36 (0.69, 2.69) | 0.369 |
≥ 30 | 24 (70.6) | 10 (29.4) | 3.84 (1.64, 8.98) | 6.13 (2.15, 17.46)∗∗ | 0.001 |
Antihypertensive medication | |||||
Yes | 50 (43.5) | 65 (56.5) | 1 | 1 | — |
No | 52 (54.2) | 44 (45.8) | 1.54 (0.89, 2.65) | 1.47 (0.76, 2.86) | 0.256 |
Antidiabetic agent route | |||||
Orals | 75 (52.1) | 69 (47.9) | 1.26 (0.63, 2.52) | 1.77 (0.77, 4.04) | 0.178 |
Injectable | 8 (30.8) | 18 (69.2) | 0.52 (0.18, 1.45) | 0.44 (1.12, 5.21) | 0.185 |
Both | 19 (46.3) | 22 (53.7) | 1 | 1 | — |
Preprandial blood glucose | |||||
≤ 130 mg/dL | 29 (40.8) | 43 (59.2) | 1 | 1 | — |
> 130 mg/dL | 73 (52.5) | 66 (47.5) | 1.64 (0.92, 2.92) | 1.68 (0.84, 3.36) | 0.139 |
Alanine transaminase | |||||
Normal | 76 (44.7) | 94 (55.3) | 1 | 1 | — |
Elevated | 26 (63.4) | 15 (36.6) | 2.14 (1.06, 4.33) | 2.14 (0.89, 5.17) | 0.091 |
AST-to-ALT ratio | |||||
≤ 1 | 62 (52.5) | 56 (47.5) | 1.47 (0.85, 2.54) | 1.50 (0.78, 2.90) | |
> 1 | 40 (43.0) | 53 (57.0) | 1 | 1 | 0.225 |
Total cholesterol | — | ||||
Normal | 80 (45.7) | 95 (54.3) | 1 | 1 | |
Borderline | 12 (66.7) | 8 (33.3) | 1.78 (0.69, 4.57) | 0.87 (0.27, 2.76) | 0.810 |
High | 10 (62.5) | 6 (37.5) | 1.98 (0.69, 5.68) | 1.06 (0.32, 3.44) | 0.928 |
Triglyceride cholesterol | |||||
Normal | 37 (35.2) | 68 (64.8) | 1 | 1 | — |
Borderline | 29 (67.4) | 14 (32.6) | 3.81 (1.79, 8.08) | 3.22 (1.36, 7.58)∗∗ | 0.008 |
High | 36 (57.1) | 27 (42.9) | 2.45 (1.29, 4.65) | 2.29 (1.03, 5.10)∗ | 0.042 |
Note: Only variables with p value < 0.25 in the bivariable regression are depicted here. 1: reference category. The bold entries represent the exact significance values (p values) themselves.
∗ p <0.05 and ∗∗p <0.01.
4. Discussion
This study evaluated the prevalence of NAFLD among patients with T2DM attending clinics in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. NAFLD was diagnosed using abdominal ultrasound imaging, revealing a prevalence of 48.3% among participants. This rate is consistent with findings from India (51.3%) and Iran (55.8%) [31, 42] but is somewhat lower than reported prevalences in Northeast Ethiopia (58.4%) and China (58.67%) [32, 43].
In contrast, the prevalence observed in this study is substantially lower than the 80.4% reported in Jordan and the 68.1%–73% range documented in Southwest Ethiopia, Bahrain, and Southwestern Saudi Arabia, where abdominal ultrasound was also employed for diagnosis [38, 39, 44, 45]. Conversely, it exceeds the 42% prevalence reported in a Brazilian population assessed by ultrasound [46].
Differences in prevalence rates may be attributed to variations in diagnostic methods, technician expertise, clinical characteristics of the diabetic populations, and medication use. For instance, the Saudi Arabian study reported a predominance of males (66.1%), whereas this study included less than half males (47.3%) [45]. Additionally, obesity prevalence differed markedly, with only 17.3% of participants classified as obese in this study compared to 65.9% in the Jordanian study. The use of lipid-lowering agents was also higher in the Bahraini study, where 77.2% of participants were on statins, compared to 63.3% in this cohort [38, 44].
This study found that women were more likely to have NAFLD than men, consistent with findings from Northeast Thailand, where postmenopausal women aged 56–60 exhibited higher NAFLD prevalence [47]. Although this observation contrasts with some previous reports [31, 38], it aligns with emerging evidence suggesting that estrogen deficiency, relative androgen excess, and decreased sex hormone–binding globulin in postmenopausal women increase NAFLD risk. Also, age-related changes in adipose tissue distribution, with increased visceral fat, further elevate NAFLD risk in this group [47, 48].
Obesity was significantly associated with NAFLD in this cohort, corroborating studies from Brazil and Saudi Arabia [45, 46]. Obesity promotes ectopic fat accumulation, adipose tissue dysfunction, and elevated proinflammatory cytokines, all of which contribute to NAFLD pathogenesis. Furthermore, obesity disrupts the balance of hepatic fatty acid uptake and synthesis, leading to excessive intrahepatic triglyceride accumulation characteristic of NAFLD [49]. Notably, T2DM itself is an independent and synergistic risk factor for NAFLD, mediated through mechanisms such as insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction [50, 51].
Hypertriglyceridemia was independently associated with NAFLD, consistent with previous findings from Ethiopia [39] and Jordan [44]. It contributes to NAFLD pathogenesis by promoting hepatic fat accumulation amid altered mitochondrial function and complex pathophysiological mechanisms [52].
In general, in line with previous reports, the results of this study underscore that lifestyle modifications—particularly weight loss through diet and exercise—remain the cornerstone of NAFLD management, with pharmacologic treatments targeting lipid abnormalities and glycemic control serving as adjunct therapies [53–55].
Structured interventions combining hypocaloric diets with both aerobic and resistance exercise effectively reduce intrahepatic fat, improve insulin sensitivity, and decrease cardiovascular and metabolic risks in this vulnerable population [54–56]. Adoption of a Mediterranean-style diet—characterized by low intake of refined carbohydrates and sugars and high in monounsaturated and Omega-3 fatty acids—has demonstrated benefits in reducing liver fat independently of weight loss, as well as improving metabolic parameters relevant to NAFLD and T2DM [57, 58].
Both aerobic and resistance exercises decrease intrahepatic fat and improve glycemic control by enhancing skeletal muscle metabolism, which is particularly advantageous for patients resistant to dietary interventions alone [54, 59]. Achieving a weight loss of at least 7%–10% improves hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, while weight loss exceeding 10% is associated with fibrosis regression and potential modification of diabetes progression or remission [54, 58]. Finally, statins and other lipid-lowering agents play a critical role in managing hypertriglyceridemia, thereby reducing cardiovascular risk and potentially improving liver outcomes in this population [60].
The study focused on patients with T2DM attending clinics in Ethiopia, providing valuable insights into the prevalence and associated factors of NAFLD within this specific population. This targeted approach enhances our understanding of the relationship between NAFLD and T2DM, which can inform the development of tailored interventions and clinical management strategies. By addressing a significant research gap, the study contributes to the limited data available on NAFLD in Ethiopia and its association with T2DM, thereby establishing a foundation for future research and intervention efforts in similar contexts.
However, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, ultrasound, while noninvasive and accessible, has limited sensitivity for detecting mild steatosis and cannot accurately quantify hepatic fat or assess fibrosis. This may have led to an underestimation of NAFLD prevalence in our cohort. Again, the reliance on ultrasound could result in misclassification, particularly in patients with early or mild disease, and may affect the reported prevalence and severity distribution. Second, more advanced diagnostic methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), transient elastography (FibroScan), or liver biopsy were not utilized to confirm NAFLD diagnosis or assess disease severity. Third, the study was conducted at a single-center diabetic clinic, which may introduce selection bias. As a result, while our hospital is a major tertiary referral center in Addis Ababa, the design may limit generalizability to all Ethiopian patients with T2DM, especially those in rural or primary care settings. Finally, the cross-sectional design of the study limits the ability to infer causal relationships between NAFLD and its associated factors.
5. Conclusions
The study found a high prevalence of NAFLD among diabetic patients, mostly mild to moderate cases. Key factors linked to NAFLD included female sex, obesity, and hypertriglyceridemia. These results underscore the importance of routine NAFLD screening in patients with T2DM, especially women and those with obesity or elevated triglycerides. Early detection and treatment of modifiable risks can significantly lower NAFLD complications in this high-risk group. Healthcare providers should emphasize lifestyle changes focused on weight loss and managing lipid levels to prevent disease progression. Local health policies should support targeted screening using tailored algorithms for diabetic populations. Future research must involve multicenter studies to confirm these findings. Additionally, future studies in Ethiopia should incorporate advanced modalities such as FibroScan, magnetic resonance imaging–proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), or liver biopsy when feasible to improve diagnostic accuracy and staging.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Department of Internal Medicine of Y12HMC for facilitating the undertaking of this study as well as the data collectors for their time and cooperation.
Nomenclature
- ALT
alanine aminotransferase
- AOR
adjusted odds ratio
- AST
aspartate aminotransferase
- BMI
body mass index
- COR
crude odds ratio
- HS
hepatic steatosis
- LDL
low-density lipoprotein
- HDL
high-density lipoprotein
- NAFL
nonalcoholic fatty liver
- NAFLD
nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
- NASH
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
- SPSS
Statistical Package for Social Sciences
- T2DM
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Y12HMC
Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
Ethics Statement
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of Y12HMC (Protocol Number 224/23). Prior to the commencement of the study, informed consent was obtained from each participant. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The cross-sectional data collected were anonymized to ensure that no personally identifiable information was included. Participants were informed that their participation was voluntary. Additionally, patients with abnormal laboratory results were promptly reported to their respective physicians for possible therapeutic intervention, in accordance with the accepted standards of practice.
Disclosure
All the authors gave final approval of the final version to be submitted and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. A part of this manuscript was presented as a thesis work to Y12HMC by E.A.B. but not published in any journal.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Author Contributions
E.A.B. conceived and designed the study. E.A.B. and S.A.Y. were involved in the proposal development, data analysis, interpretation, and manuscript writing. Y.M.T. and A.A.B. were involved in data collection and revising the manuscript. All other authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Funding
No funding was received for this manuscript.
References
- 1.Abd El-Kader S. M., El-Den Ashmawy E. M. S. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The Diagnosis and Management. World Journal of Hepatology . 2015;7(6):846–858. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i6.846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Puri P., Sanyal A. J. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Definitions, Risk Factors, and Workup. Clinics in Liver Disease . 2012;1(4):99–103. doi: 10.1002/cld.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gluvic Z., Tomasevic R., Bojovic K., Obradovic M., Isenovic E. R. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Multidisciplinary Clinical Practice Approach—The Institutional Adaptation to Existing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Emergency and Critical Care Medicine . 2022;2(1):12–22. doi: 10.1097/EC9.0000000000000016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Benedict M., Zhang X. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Expanded Review. World Journal of Hepatology . 2017;9(16):715–732. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i16.715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mantovani A., Scorletti E., Mosca A., Alisi A., Byrne C. D., Targher G. Complications, Morbidity and Mortality of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Metabolism . 2020;111 doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154170.154170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Eslam M., Sanyal A. J., George J., et al. A New Definition for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease: An International Expert Consensus Statement. Journal of Hepatology . 2020;73(1):202–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chalasani N., Younossi Z., Lavine J. E., et al. The Diagnosis and Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Practice Guidance From the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology . 2018;67(1):328–357. doi: 10.1002/hep.29367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li G., Zhang X., Lin H., Liang L. Y., Wong G. L. H., Wong V. W. S. Non-Invasive Tests of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Chinese Medical Journal . 2022;135(5):532–546. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Powell E. E., Wong V. W., Rinella M. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Lancet . 2021;397(10290):2212–2224. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32511-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Younossi Z. M., Marchesini G., Pinto-Cortez H., Petta S. Epidemiology of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Implications for Liver Transplantation. Transplantation . 2019;103(1):22–27. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Spearman C. W., Abdo A., Ambali A., et al. Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Social Determinants of Health, and Current Management for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology . 2021;6(12):1036–1046. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00275-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Younossi Z. M., Koenig A. B., Abdelatif D., Fazel Y., Henry L., Wymer M. Global Epidemiology of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease—Meta-Analytic Assessment of Prevalence, Incidence, and Outcomes. Hepatology . 2016;64(1):73–84. doi: 10.1002/hep.28431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wong W. K., Chan W. K. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Global Perspective. Clinical Therapeutics . 2021;43(3):473–499. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bandaru V. C. S. S., Chaudhury J. R., Lalitha P., et al. Prevalence of Asymptomatic Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Nondiabetic Participants: A Study From South India. Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine . 2019;31(1):92–98. doi: 10.4103/ejim.ejim_76_18. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sun H., Saeedi P., Karuranga S., et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, Regional and Country-Level Diabetes Prevalence Estimates for 2021 and Projections for 2045. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice . 2022;183 doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119.109119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lu X., Xie Q., Pan X., et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: pathogenesis, prevention and therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther . 2024;9 doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01951-9.262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zeru M. A., Tesfa E., Mitiku A. A., Seyoum A., Bokoro T. A. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus in Ethiopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Scientific Reports . 2021;11(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01256-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen J., Hu P., Wang Y., Zhu Z. Association Between Type 2 Diabetes Status and Prevalence of Liver Steatosis and Fibrosis Among Adults Aged ≥40 Years. BMC Endocrine Disorders . 2022;22(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01046-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bhatt H. B., Smith R. J. Fatty Liver Disease in Diabetes Mellitus. Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition . 2015;4(2):101–108. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.01.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee Y., Cho Y., Lee B. W., et al. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Diabetes. Part I: Epidemiology and Diagnosis. Diabetes & Metabolism Journal . 2019;43(1):31–45. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2019.0011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xia M. F., Bian H., Gao X. NAFLD and Diabetes: Two Sides of the Same Coin? Rationale for Gene-Based Personalized NAFLD Treatment. Frontiers in Pharmacology . 2019;10:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Xie J., Wang M., Long Z., et al. Global Burden of Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Young Adults, 1990-2019: Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. BMJ . 2022;379 doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072385.e068743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kosmalski M., Śliwińska A., Drzewoski J. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus—The Chicken or the Egg Dilemma. Biomedicine . 2023;11(4):1–16. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11041097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fina Lubaki J. P., Omole O. B., Francis J. M. Glycaemic Control Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Sub-Saharan Africa From 2012 to 2022: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome . 2022;14(1):134–178. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00902-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Portincasa P. Correction to: NAFLD, MAFLD, and Beyond: One or Several Acronyms for Better Comprehension and Patient Care. Internal and Emergency Medicine . 2023;18(3):961–964. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03252-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Katte J. C., Sibomana L., Hapunda G., Cikomola J. C., Abidha C. A. Diabetes in Sub-Saharan Africa: What Are the Next Steps? Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology . 2022;10(11):766–768. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00274-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Alkhouri N., Almomani A., Le P., et al. The Prevalence of Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Adolescents and Young Adults in the United States: Analysis of the NHANES Database. BMC Gastroenterology . 2022;22(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02430-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tomah S., Hamdy O., Abuelmagd M. M., et al. Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and Fibrosis Among Young Adults in Egypt. BMJ Open Gastroenterology . 2021;8(1) doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000780.e000574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Armstrong M. J., Adams L. A., Canbay A., Syn W. K. Extrahepatic Complications of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Hepatology . 2014;59(3):1174–1197. doi: 10.1002/hep.26717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Younossi Z. M., Blissett D., Blissett R., et al. The Economic and Clinical Burden of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in the United States and Europe. Hepatology . 2016;64(5):1577–1586. doi: 10.1002/hep.28785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rohini I., Aarthi N. A Study of Prevalence of Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research . 2019;6(12):37–40. doi: 10.21276/ijcmr.2019.6.12.48. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhou Q., Wang Y., Wang J., et al. Prevalence and Risk Factor Analysis for the Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Medicine (Baltimore) . 2021;100(10) doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024940.e24941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Paruk I. M., Pirie F. J., Motala A. A. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Africa: A Hidden Danger. Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics . 2019;4 doi: 10.1017/gheg.2019.2.e3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Orlien S. M. S., Ismael N. Y., Ahmed T. A., et al. Unexplained Chronic Liver Disease in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Gastroenterology . 2018;18(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0755-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Toshikuni N., Tsutsumi M., Arisawa T. Clinical Differences Between Alcoholic Liver Disease and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. World Journal of Gastroenterology . 2014;20(26):8393–8406. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. Using Multivariate Statistics . 6th. Boston: Pearson; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Muhammad A. G., Hansen F. O., Gantzel R. H., et al. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Greenland: A Register-Based Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Circumpolar Health . 2022;81(1) doi: 10.1080/22423982.2022.2065755.2040049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mohamed A. M., Isa H. M., Ali M. S., Dadi A., Kadhim Z. Prevalence of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Among Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Attending Primary Health Care Centers in Bahrain. Oman Medical Journal . 2022;37(2) doi: 10.5001/omj.2022.53.e356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zawdie B., Tadesse S., Wolide A. D., Nigatu T. A., Bobasa E. M. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Associated Factors Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences . 2018;28(1):19–30. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v28i1.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ferraioli G., Monteiro L. B. S. Ultrasound-Based Techniques for the Diagnosis of Liver Steatosis. World Journal of Gastroenterology . 2019;25(40):6053–6062. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i40.6053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Leow W., Chan A. W., Mendoza P. G. L., Lo R., Yap K., Kim H. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The Pathologist’s Perspective. Clinical and Molecular Hepatology . 2023;29(Supplement):S302–S318. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Merat S., Yarahmadi S., Tahaghoghi S., et al. Prevalence of Fatty Liver Disease Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients and Its Relation to Insulin Resistance. Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases (MEJDD) . 2009;1(2):74–79. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Abebe G., Ayanaw D., Ayelgn Mengstie T., Dessie G., Malik T. Assessment of Fatty Liver and Its Correlation With Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Attending Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia. SAGE Open Medicine . 2022;10 doi: 10.1177/20503121221124762.205031212211247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Almahmoud M. H., Al Khawaja N. M., Alkinani A., Khader Y., Ajlouni K. M. Prevalence of Fatty Liver Disease and Its Associated Factors Among Jordanian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study. Annals of Medicine and Surgery . 2021;68 doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102677.102677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Alsabaani A. A., Mahfouz A. A., Awadalla N. J., Musa M. J., Al Humayed S. M. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Among Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Abha City, South Western Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health . 2018;15(11):2521–2528. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ferreira V. S. G., Pernambuco R. B., Lopes E. P., et al. Frequency and Risk Factors Associated With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia e Metabologia . 2010;54(4):362–368. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27302010000400004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Summart U., Thinkhamrop B., Chamadol N., Kim C. S., Khuntikeo N., Songthamwat M. Gender Differences in the Prevalence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in the Northeast of Thailand: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. F1000Research . 2017;6:p. 1630. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12417.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hanlon C. L., Yuan L. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The Role of Visceral Adipose Tissue. Clinics in Liver Disease . 2022;19(3):106–110. doi: 10.1002/cld.1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fabbrini E., Sullivan S., Klein S. Obesity and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Biochemical, Metabolic, and Clinical Implications. Hepatology . 2010;51(2):679–689. doi: 10.1002/hep.23280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tanase D. M., Gosav E. M., Costea C. F., et al. The Intricate Relationship Between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Insulin Resistance (IR), and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Journal Diabetes Research . 2020;2020 doi: 10.1155/2020/3920196.3920196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dharmalingam M., Yamasandhi P. G. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism . 2018;22(3):421–428. doi: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_585_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Braghini M. R., Meroni M., Longo M., et al. Expanding the Phenotypic Spectrum of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Hypertriglyceridemia. Journal of Clinical Medicine . 2022;11(20):p. 6103. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.967899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Viveiros K. The Role of Life Style Modifications in Comprehensive Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Treatment. Clinics in Liver Disease . 2021;17(1):11–14. doi: 10.1002/cld.1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Prabhakar O., Bhuvaneswari M. Role of Diet and Lifestyle Modification in the Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. Tzu Chi Medical Journal . 2021;33(2):135–145. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_86_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tacke F., Horn P., Wai-Sun Wong V., et al. EASL–EASD–EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) Journal of Hepatology . 2024;81(3):492–542. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zelber-Sagi S., Bernadette M. J. Practical Lifestyle Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease for Busy Clinicians. Diabetes Spectrum: A Publication of the American Diabetes Association . 2024;37(1):39–47. doi: 10.2337/dsi23-0009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sualeheen A., Tan S. Y., Georgousopoulou E., et al. Mediterranean Diet for the Management of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Non-Mediterranean, Western Countries: What’s Known and What’s Needed? Nutrition Bulletin . 2024;49(4):444–462. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Semmler G., Datz C., Reiberger T., Trauner M. Diet and Exercise in NAFLD/NASH: Beyond the Obvious. Liver International . 2021;41(10):2249–2268. doi: 10.1111/liv.15024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Charatcharoenwitthaya P., Kuljiratitikal K., Aksornchanya O., Chaiyasoot K., Bandidniyamanon W., Charatcharoenwitthaya N. Moderate-Intensity Aerobic vs Resistance Exercise and Dietary Modification in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology . 2021;12(3) doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000316.e00322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kim K., Ginsberg H. N., Choi S. H. New, Novel Lipid-Lowering Agents for Reducing Cardiovascular Risk: Beyond Statins. Diabetes and Metabolism Journal . 2022;46(4):517–532. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2022.0198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.