Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Sep 2.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Urol. 2025 Aug 1;22(12):799–814. doi: 10.1038/s41585-025-01065-z

CAUTIon – not all UTIs are the same

Jonathan J Molina 1,2, Ana L Flores-Mireles 1,2,
PMCID: PMC12401005  NIHMSID: NIHMS2101795  PMID: 40751081

Abstract

Urinary tract infections are one of the most common infections, accounting for ~400 million diagnoses per year worldwide. Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) occur in healthy individuals with no structural or functional abnormalities of the urinary system and primarily affect women. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are a type of complicated UTI affecting patients who have a urinary catheter in place, often hospitalized patients or patients with conditions that prevent them from urinating naturally. Both infections share common symptoms, diagnostics and treatment options but also differ greatly in pathophysiology, aetiology, risk factors and comorbidities. These differences could explain why antibiotic treatments — which generally lead to positive outcomes in patients with uUTIs — often fail in patients with CAUTIs. Understanding these differences could guide evidence-based insights into why treatments for CAUTIs should be different from those for uUTIs, specifically, by modifying catheters, which initiate the damage-induced segue for UTIs.

Introduction

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common diagnoses in the USA and one of the most common bacterial infections worldwide with ≥30%1 of diagnoses2,3. In 2001, UTIs accounted for 150 million hospital visits4, which increased to ~405 million in 2019, leading to ~237,000 deaths5,6. UTIs can be community acquired or hospital acquired, which can also lead to different outcomes (Fig. 1). UTIs are classified as uncomplicated or complicated UTIs7. Uncomplicated UTIs (uUTIs) occur in healthy individuals without structural or functional urinary system abnormalities, including absence of kidney dysfunction or impairment, and no concomitant diseases that could promote the UTI8. Furthermore, uUTIs affect mainly women (4:1 ratio). This disparity occurs for numerous reasons, including the urethra being much shorter in women than in men, enabling infectious agents to reach the bladder faster; the proximity of the female urethra to the anus and vagina; and hormonal differences — which can change during perinatal periods or menopause in women — that contribute to the microflora of the proximally close vagina9,10. UTIs can affect either the lower urinary tract (urethra and bladder) or the upper urinary tract (ureter and kidneys), termed cystitis and pyelonephritis, respectively. Antibiotics are successfully used in uUTIs (~80% success rate) to resolve acute symptoms11,12 but fail to eliminate recurrence risk13. Recurring UTIs (rUTIs) occur in ~33% of patients with uUTI, increasing clinical visits and antibiotics use. Importantly, untreated UTIs might disseminate to the kidneys, lead to secondary bloodstream infections and potentially cause urosepsis14.

Fig. 1 |. Comparison of crucial clinical characteristics between uncomplicated catheter-associated urinary tract infections.

Fig. 1 |

Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) and catheter-associated UTIs (CAUTIs) share many crucial similarities in symptoms, diagnostics from urine culture reports and even treatments. Yet, important differences are also present, including catheterization, population at risk and presentation of some systemic symptoms. Despite the differences, both conditions are treated similarly with antibiotics, with some differences in antibiotics regimes178. The outcomes of the treatments vary greatly, which could explain why patients with uUTIs have a low risk of bloodstream infections whereas CAUTIs often lead to sepsis. *Relevance for fungal infections. CFU, colony-forming units; E.coli, Escherichia coli.

Complicated UTIs occur when patients are immunocompromised, catheterized, have prostate complications (in men), diabetes, or neurogenic bladder15. Most health care-associated UTIs are caused by some sort of clinical instrumentation, including the use of urinary catheters, resulting in catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). CAUTIs account for ~80% of all complicated UTIs and ~40% of all hospital-acquired infections (HAIs)16. CAUTIs cause both cystitis and pyelonephritis, although kidney infections can be more severe than in uUTI17. CAUTI treatments include removing or replacing catheters and antibiotics regimen. However, success rates of antibiotics are low, barely reaching ~40%18. Importantly, multidrug resistance is steadily increasing among the urinary pathogens (uropathogens)19. Urinary catheterization is the primary risk factor for CAUTIs. However, this procedure is very important to help patients safely empty their bladder20, including patients with difficulty urinating naturally, neurogenic bladders, spinal-cord injuries (SCIs), patients undergoing surgeries, or those admitted into nursing homes20.

HAIs drastically surged during the COVID-19 pandemic21,22; specifically, CAUTI incidences increased by ~19% overall in 2020 compared with pre-pandemic incidences (2019), with a staggering 30% rise in patients in intensive care units (ICUs) alone22. In nursing homes specifically, 13–15% of patients are catheterized on the day of admittance, which predisposes these individuals to developing infections, amongst other complications2326. For example, patients catheterized for ≥75% of their time in a nursing home are three times more likely to die within a year than uncatheterized patients, primarily owing to infection27. This phenomenon contributes to the 13,000 annual CAUTI-related sepsis deaths28.

High CAUTI prevalence also causes high financial burden, increasing hospital stay29 and visit cost by an average of US$1,000/patient, resulting in ~US$355 million/year3035. This high cost is not covered by Medicare and Medicaid insurance because CAUTIs are considered preventable36. Thus, medical institutions have implemented protocols and guidelines to reduce CAUTI incidence, including improved sterile techniques, reduced catheterization times and regular cleaning37,38, which have improved patient outcomes. For example, results from a study in which the effects of preventative strategies for reducing CAUTIs were assessed in multiple US hospitals and all Michigan hospitals showed that between 2007 and 2009, reminders todiscontinue catheter use reduced CAUTI incidence from 44% to 23%39. Despite these efforts, CAUTIs remain highly prevalent in the USA, Europe and Asia1,28,40.

In this Review, we aim to establish that although uUTIs and CAUTIs might be similar in terms of anatomy, prevalent pathogens and sequelae, these infections differ greatly. Emerging evidence suggests that CAUTIs differ from uUTIs in terms of pathophysiology, symptomatology, aetiology and risk factors. Based on these differences and the rise of multidrug-resistant uropathogens, treatments for CAUTI should become CAUTI specific, antibiotic sparring and different from uUTI treatments14.

Pathophysiology and aetiology

The urothelium and lamina propria are the primary protective components of bladder tissue that act as barriers against infections. The urothelium is composed of umbrella (superficial layer), intermediate and basal layer cells that can secrete protective antimicrobial compounds41. The lamina propria is the immune defence layer, harbouring resident and recruited immune cells — with resident cells acting as sentinels for infection and other insults — and initiating an early immune response to microbes41. Yet, these protective barriers are disrupted during both uUTIs and CAUTIs (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2 |. Pathophysiology of uncomplicated and catheter-associated urinary tract infections.

Fig. 2 |

Bacteria in urinary tract infections (UTIs) are currently thought to ascend into the bladder through the urethra. Uncomplicated UTIs (uUTIs) are primarily caused by uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC), whereas catheter-associated UTIs (CAUTIs) have a broad range of causative agents including Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, and fungal species. Aa, In uUTI, UPEC bacteria use type I pili (FimH) to bind to the innermost epithelial layer of the urinary bladder, the urothelium. Ab, Once bound to the urothelium, bacteria first invade umbrella cells of the urinary bladder and then undergo clonal expansion, in turn forming intracellular bacterial colonies (IBCs), which enable UPEC to evade any surface bacterial-clearance mechanisms by the infected host and, therefore, have a crucial role in UPEC infection. Ac, d, UPEC forms filaments that protrude from IBCs, through the umbrella cells, into the lumen of the bladder, and reinfect the host. Ba, Insertion of the urinary catheter causes damage to the urothelium and leads to a wound-healing response during which fibrin and fibrinogen (Fg) is recruited to the urinary bladder. Bb, Fg coats both the catheter and the bladder, where pathogens bind Fg to form biofilms. Plasmin is crucial to clear Fg, but many disease states and even pathogens are able to inhibit its fibrin-clearing function, leading to fibrin accumulation (Bc). Bd, As fibrin accumulates, infection severity increases and enables pathogens to disseminate to other organs, potentially leading to sepsis.

Uncomplicated urinary tract infections

Years of uUTI research have established uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) as the primary cause of uUTI (75–95% of instances)4, depending on patient populations. Klebsiella spp. and Staphylococcus spp. are also uUTI uropathogens, with lower and variable prevalence compared with UPEC (6–13%42 and 6–15%43, respectively) (Supplementary Fig. 1). Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus spp., and Pseudomonas spp.44 can also cause uUTIs, although at a much lower rate than UPEC. High prevalence of UPEC is partly explained by its residence in gut microbiota as a commensal bacterium45 but also by UPEC’s specialization and divergence from gut commensals, with an arsenal of pathogenic colonization and immune evasion factors46 (Table 1). Contamination of the perineal region can lead to UPEC ascending the urethra into the bladder by using its flagellum45 (Fig. 2A). In the bladder, type 1 pilus D-mannose specific adhesin (FimH) on UPEC binds mannosylated uroplakins receptor on umbrella cells46,47 (Supplementary Fig. 2), leading to bacterial internalization and invasion of umbrella cells (Fig. 2Aa). This internal colonization can lead to intracellular bacterial communities (IBCs; 103 bacterial cells), quiescent intracellular reservoirs (QIRs; 4–19 non-replicating bacterial cells), or UPEC expulsion7,46. Infection outcomes depend on host–pathogen interactions. For example, IBC formation could result in active UTI; however, development of QIRs results in pathogen reservoirs, which could lead to recurrent UTIs14,46,48. However, UPEC has mechanisms to avoid expulsion and immune evasion, which can lead to chronic UTI and subsequent kidney dissemination41,46,48.

Table 1 |. Comparison of adhesion and virulence factors in uUTI and CAUTI.

Uropathogen Type Adherence (uUTI) Adherence (CAUTI) Virulence factors (uUTI) Virulence factors (CAUTI)
UPEC Gram-negative Type 1 pili (FimH)7
Type P pili7
Type S pili7
Dr adhesins7 Curli194
Type 1 pili (FimH)195
Type P pili196
Hly197
Capsular antigens7
Cnf17 Yersiniabactin7
Cyclic di-AMP198
Flagellum7
Ecp199
FocG199
TraT199
Vat200
ChuA200
FyuA200
IutA200
PAI200
ShiA200
Eco274 (ref. 200)
SisA200
SisB
Fec201
PapC71
SfaS71
Afa1 (ref. 202)

K. pneumoniae

FimH203
Type 1 and 3 pili7

FimH203

Capsule7
Urease204
RmpA204
Enterochelin204
Aerobactin204

Urease204

P. mirabilis

Mannose-resistant proteus-like and P pili205
AipA adhesin7
TaaP adhesin7

NAF fimbriae (also known as UCA fimbriae)205
Mannose-resistant Proteus-like and P pili205

Capsule7
ZapA7
Flagellum206

Swarming207
Urease207
Pst206
RsbA206

P. aeruginosa

T4Pa205

T4Pa205

ExoS7,208
Phospholipase7
Pyoverdine208

Cyclic di-AMP209
Exopolysaccharides210
Extracellular DNA210
Capsule7
LasB7
Rhamnolipids7,208 Pyoverdine208
Pyocyanin208

A. baumannii

NA

Abp1 and Abp2 (refs. 112,113)
InvL211

NA

T2SS211

E. faecalis Gram-positive Ebp pili7
Ace adhesin7
Esp adhesin7
Ebp pili7,103
Esp205
NA SprE68

GelE111

Cyclic di-AMP212

MntH2 (manganese acquisition)213

AcdACB/AdcII system (zinc homeostasis)214

S. aureus

NA

ClfB108

Urease215

LpdA216
MtlD216
SucD216
FumC216

C. albicans Fungi NA NA NA EFG1, hyphal morphology77
Phospholipase217
Proteinase217
Haemolysis217

A. baumannii, Acinetobacter baumannii; C. albicans, Candida albicans; CAUTI, catheter-associated urinary tract infection; Clf, clumping factor; E. faecalis, Enterococcus faecalis; K. pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae; NA, not available; NAF, nonagglutinating fimbriae; P. aeruginosa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; P. mirabilis, Proteus mirabilis; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus; T2SS, type II secretion system; UCA, uroepithelial cell adhesin; UPEC, uropathogenic Escherichia coli; uUTI, uncomplicated urinary tract infection.

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli evasion of TLR-mediated immunity.

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is able to recognize pathogens and damage-associated molecular patterns. TLR4 recognition of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on UPEC initiates a signalling cascade, leading to immunological responses directed to the infection site7,41,46,48. TLR signalling can lead to UPEC expulsion from the infected cell through adenylyl cyclase 3-dependent cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production, which stimulates engaging motor protein-mediated transport of bacteria-containing vesicles to the surface of bladder cells49, leading to the expulsion of internalized bacteria7,46. UPEC evades initial TLR responses by escaping phagosomes and promoting multiplication. In the cytoplasm, UPEC forms IBCs that provide a haven for UPEC against the infiltrating immune cells and antibiotic treatments46. Propagation of the infection begins with UPEC morphological changes (fluxing and filamenting), which enable bacteria to protrude and breakout from the infected cell and colonize the neighbouring umbrella cells46 (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, UPEC filamentous morphology confers immune evasion by inhibiting phagocytosis7,46. Additionally, UPEC can form QIRs that remain cryptic and dormant within the bladder cell, avoiding immune cells and re-emerging subsequently to lead to rUTIs7,46.

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli suppression of IL-6.

In addition to immune-evasion, UPEC can also suppress immunity to increase virulence. LPS–TLR activation in response to UPEC infection initiates both nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) and cAMP–protein kinase A (cAMP/PKA) signalling cascades, leading to the expression of cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-8 by bladder cells49. IL-6 signalling is essential for controlling IBC formation and kidney infections. Results from a study in a uUTI mouse model showed an increase in IBC formation and pyelonephritis in Il6-deficient-mice compared with wild type mice50. Specifically, STAT3, an IL-6-downstream signalling factor, was shown to be important for controlling IBC formation, as Stat3-deficient mice showed increased IBC formation, similar to Il6-deficient mice50. In another study, IL-6 was shown to promote the recruitment of bacteria-clearing immune cells. In this study, monocyte populations were assessed in wild type mice treated with a vehicle or IL-6-neutralizing antibodies, and IL-6-neutralized mice showed decreased Ly6C+ monocyte recruitment and inhibition of inflammatory monocyte expansion in situ, which is a crucial step, aiding clearance of UPEC during infection51. Furthermore, UPEC also modulates host immunity, differently from other E. coli laboratory strains. Results from an in vitro study showed that LPS-induced elevation of IL-6 in 5637 and T24 bladder cells infected with non-pathogenic E. coli (MG1655), differently from 5637 and T24 bladder cells infected with uropathogenic strains such as UTI89 or NU14, where IL-6 levels were suppressed52 The immunosuppressive potential of UPEC was further corroborated by another study in which the immunosuppressive effect of UPEC strains (700414, 700415, CFT073, F11, 536, and J96) was compared with that of non-pathogenic E. coli (MG1655)53. Results from these studies suggest that UPEC strains have evolved to reduce bladder immune response, which might lead to chronic colonization and QIR formation to cause subsequent rUTIs. Thus, IL-6 has a crucial role in controlling the IBC formation, increasing infiltrating immune cells and limiting pyelonephritis.

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli infection sensitizes the bladder by inducing epigenetic changes.

rUTIs are a health burden affecting ~33% of all patients with uUTI and can worsen patient quality of life4,13,43,54,55. Mouse models of uUTI have been crucial to identify specific acute host–pathogen checkpoints, including high initial bacterial burden, severe bladder inflammation (oedema), pyuria, and elevated blood pro-inflammatory cytokine levels56. These acute checkpoints can determine the disease and rUTI outcomes, both in mice and in humans. In a longitudinal uUTI study in which mice were infected with UPEC, by 4 weeks, ~50% of UPEC-infected mice were not able to clear acute infections, resulting in chronic cystitis57. Specifically, mice unable to resolve infections (defined as ‘sensitized’) had increased cystitis and urosepsis after a 6-month convalescence time, and were more prone to infections by other uropathogens, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, than mice that resolved the initial infection (defined as ‘resolved’). These results indicate that outcomes of an initial UPEC infection determine chronic inflammation, leading to a molecular imprint that affects mucosal remodelling, inhibits cell maturation and alters mucosal responses during subsequent infections58. In another study, the molecular imprint left by UPEC in urothelial stem cells was shown to cause epigenetic changes59. In this study, urothelial stem cells derived from mice with chronic infections showed epigenetic modifications (chromatin accessibility, DNA methylation and histone modification) that enhanced caspase-1-mediated cell death compared with cells derived from resolved mice, which cleared the initial infection. Thus, chronic UPEC infection acts as an epi-mutagen by reprogramming the urothelial epigenome, leading to urothelial remodelling and altering the innate response to subsequent infections59. Tissue remodelling through increased urothelial cell death after an initial UPEC infection could alter protective features (such as cell shedding to remove IBC-containing infected cells, antimicrobial peptide production and immune signalling) adopted by a mature urothelium in response to subsequent infections, in turn increasing UTI severity and urosepsis, as observed in gut infections, where abnormal gut microflora can alter epithelial barrier integrity, and increasing the risk of sepsis60.

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli infections benefit from host COX2 signalling.

During early UPEC UTI, inflammatory and immune responses are triggered as defence mechanisms. However, some inflammatory responses, including activation of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) expression, have a role in acute host–pathogen checkpoint. Results from a study in a mouse model of chronic UTIs showed that COX2 expressed by urothelial cells in response to UPEC infection triggered an excessive early neutrophil response (Fig. 2A), which induced bladder tissue damage owing to neutrophil urothelial transmigration, contributing to host susceptibility to rUTI61. This evidence was further validated in a clinical study in which COX2 was shown to be significantly overexpressed in the inflamed bladder regions of postmenopausal individuals with UTI (P = 0.0007) and in the urine of women with recurrent UTI (P = 0.00001). Notably, COX2 expression predicted UTI recurrence with greater accuracy than any other clinical variable (alone or in combination)62. Furthermore, in acute and chronic cystitis mouse models, COX2 inhibition by using the NSAID indomethacin or a COX2-specific inhibitor (SC-236) led to reduced pyuria and mucosal damage61. Furthermore, COX2 expression levels correlated positively with UTI outcome, as mice with unchanged COX2 expression compared with mock-infected mice had less bacterial colonization (~2 log CFUs) than mice with a ~3 log-fold COX2 increased expression54. Upon reinfection, sensitized mice had a ~50-fold COX2 induction, whereas no COX2 expression was found in resolved mice, suggesting that UPEC takes advantage of COX2 induction to circumvent urothelial immunity during UTI57. Importantly, results from this study align with the findings from a small clinical trial in which 80 patients with uUTI received either ibuprofen (a COX2 inhibitor) or ciprofloxacin (antibiotic) in a 3-day course treatment for uUTI. In this study, both treatment groups showed similar reduction (~50%) in mean symptomatic score, including dysuria, urine frequency and low abdominal pain. Notably, the ibuprofen-receiving cohort also showed no additional adverse effects or need for secondary antibiotic treatment compared with the ciprofloxacin group63. Results from these studies showed that COX2 inhibition might provide an antibiotic-sparing alternative therapy for uUTI. The fact that COX2 can also be targeted by several over-the-counter NSAIDs and anti-inflammatory steroids supports COX inhibition as a potential therapeutic option to avoid exacerbating antibiotics resistance in patients with UPEC uUTIs. Considering that catheter-induced inflammation drives the CAUTI pathophysiology, understanding whether COX2 or other inflammatory pathways are also activated during CAUTI will be crucial to assess whether targeting catheter-induced inflammation with NSAIDs or anti-inflammatory steroids might also be useful in developing CAUTI treatment options.

Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

Different to uUTIs, CAUTIs develop in the presence of a urinary catheter64. Urinary catheterization, despite its benefits, predisposes patients to developing a CAUTI7,14. Notably, the risk of an infection increases with catheter dwell time7,14. In humans and mice, urinary catheterization can mechanically injure the urothelium, disrupting host mechanical defences and promoting inflammation65,66. Urinary pathogens can use different recruited proteins (such as serum albumin, soluble fibrinogen or clotted fibrin) to adhere to catheters and develop biofilm communities67,68. Biofilms are microorganism communities adhered to a surface and enclosed in an extracellular matrix consisting of proteins, polysaccharides and extracellular DNA69. Biofilms are a survival/virulence strategy, which protects microbes against environmental stress and antimicrobial agents, and helps to evade host immunity69. Biofilms enable pathogens to evade immune surveillance, persist in the bladder and disseminate to other organs and, therefore, are crucial for the pathogenesis of CAUTIs7,7077. Catheter-induced inflammation recruits serum proteins to promote healing, including fibrin and fibrinogen (referred to as fibrin(ogen) in this Review), blood coagulation proteins7,14,67,76,78. Once in the bladder, soluble fibrinogen polymerizes into fibrin to stop bleeding at wound sites79. Fibrin(ogen) becomes highly abundant in the catheterized bladder, adhering to the urothelium and to the catheter7,14,67,76,78,80. Paradoxically, fibrin(ogen) provides a scaffold for microbes to develop biofilms and cause an infection from pathogens that would not otherwise be present in the bladder environment7,14,67,68,76,78,8183. Thus, fibrin(ogen) presence in the bladder is a risk factor for CAUTI.

Fibrin(ogen) is a risk factor for catheter-associated urinary tract infection.

Many of the CAUTI pathogens have low-to-no uUTI prevalence84 (Supplementary Fig. 1b). The diversity of CAUTI pathogens could be ascribed to the comorbidities associated with catheterization, such as bladder incontinence, immobility, and other comorbidities, which could influence CAUTI onset alone30,31,85,86. Notably, fibrin(ogen) presence in the catheterized bladder is exploited by these uropathogens and leads to fibrin(ogen)-dependent biofilms, which are crucial for CAUTI pathogenesis (Fig. 2B) in human and mouse CAUTI7,14,67,68,76,78. Biofilms and infections correlate positively with fibrin(ogen) abundance in vitro and in vivo67,87. The fact that uropathogens can bind fibrin(ogen) and reside in biofilms during CAUTI might mislead urinalysis for CAUTI diagnosis, which is based on detecting planktonic bacteria from urine samples84,88,89. Results from numerous studies support that patients with CAUTI had a high catheter colonization by multiple uropathogens, regardless of negative urine cultures and of receiving antimicrobial treatment73,9096 (Supplementary Fig. 1b). This unprecedented colonization might contribute to a persistent CAUTI, often leading to in-hospital bacteraemia, with a ~30% 7-day mortality rate and ~40% 30-day mortality rate in patients ≥50 years old30,32,97; in addition, ~25% of sepsis instances come from complicated UTI, including CAUTIs98. Lower percentages of urosepsis death in catheterized patients have been reported in other studies (as low as 5%)97; however, the high incidences of catheterization still make this statistic alarming, as over 100 million catheters are being sold in the USA annually99. Thus, to date, diagnoses based on urine culture have not provided a full picture of present uropathogens, potentially leading to inadequate antibiotic treatments100102.

A question to be addressed is how diverse uropathogens are able to bind to fibrin(ogen). Fibrin(ogen) is a complex glycoprotein composed of two α-chains, two β-chains and two γ-chains and is highly glycosylated, containing a wide variety of sugar residues including mannose, N-acetyl glucosamine, fucose, galactose and N‐acetyl-neuraminic acid67,103. Therefore, the ability of uropathogens to form protein–protein or sugar–protein interactions with fibrinogen is not surprising (Supplementary Fig. 2) and could explain the diverse range of uropathogens that cause CAUTIs, including Gram-positive, Gram-negative and fungal pathogens84 (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Interestingly, the similarity in pathogen diversity between urosepsis and CAUTI suggests that pathogens capable of causing bloodstream infections might also thrive in catheterization-induced inflammation, leading to CAUTIs (Supplementary Fig. 1bd).

Gram-positive bacteria and enterococci.

Many Gram-positive CAUTI pathogens can bind fibrin(ogen) through ‘lock and key’ protein interactions (in which protein has a binding site that perfectly matches the shape of another protein) (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis have microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules, specifically, the Ser-Asp repeat region (SdrG family) of proteins, to mediate fibrin(ogen) binding104 (Supplementary Fig. 2). S. aureus has many fibrin(ogen)-binding proteins105, and this arsenal is differentially used based on the infection site105108. In a mouse model of intraperitoneal bacterial sepsis, S. aureus was shown to bind fibrinogen by using clumping factor A (ClfA) to bind the fibrinogen γ-chain. This binding enhanced S. aureus virulence and led to infection106,107. Interestingly, in a mouse model of CAUTI, S. aureus was shown to use clumping factor B (ClfB), rather than ClfA, to bind fibrin(ogen) (Table 1). ClfB deletion resulted in a defective colonization on urinary catheters and bladders108, highlighting how the microenvironment of the catheterized bladder can influence adhesin expression, potentially activating a different expression profile compared with that activated in the bloodstream.

Enterococci are the third most prevalent CAUTI pathogen and are a menace in hospital settings owing to their intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistance, including last-resort antibiotics such as vancomycin109. Enterococcus faecalis uses the Ebp pilus, specifically the tip adhesin EbpA, to bind to fibrin(ogen) through the MIDAS motif76 (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 2e). A homologous gene on Enterococcus faecium is probably also capable of binding fibrin(ogen) owing to its 100% similarity to EbpA (Supplementary Fig. 2) and was capable of causing infections in a CAUTI mouse model76,110. In this study, a vaccine targeting the EbpA N-terminus domain reduced enterococcal CAUTI derived from E. faecalis and E. faecium (uropathogenic laboratory and clinical strains). Importantly, EbpA antibody retrieved from EbpA-vaccinated mice was used as a passive immunization treatment in mice with an enterococcal infection. EbpA antibody treatment substantially reduced enterococcal titres of mice with an existing CAUTI caused by diverse clinical isolates, including E. faecium, E. faecalis and vancomycin-resistant enterococci76. Thus, the fibrin(ogen)–EbpA interaction is crucial for enterococcal CAUTIs, suggesting that blocking this interaction could be an efficient antibiotics-sparing treatment.

E. faecalis produces additional virulence factors during CAUTI, including two main secreted proteases, a serine protease (SprE) and gelatinase (GelE) (Table 1). These secreted proteases target the two main circuits of the coagulation cascade, creating an ideal environment for enterococcal colonization. Specifically, GelE degrades fibrin(ogen) and factor XII68,111, with fibrin(ogen) degradation providing essential nutrients for E. faecalis to thrive in the urinary bladder111 environment, which is typically nutrient-deprived in healthy individuals. SprE targets the host fibrinolytic system, which normally degrades fibrin clots, by inactivating plasminogen and plasmin68. This action results in fibrin accumulation, enhancing biofilm formation and promoting the persistence of E. faecalis CAUTI (Fig. 2B). The dual ability of E. faecalis to use fibrin(ogen) as a nutrient and inhibit normal host physiological systems that remove fibrin(ogen) from inflamed sites further explains how E. faecalis thrives and exploits the catheterized bladder.

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Gram-negative pathogens.

Gram-negative bacteria including E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii are known to cause CAUTI and form fibrin(ogen)-dependent biofilms14,67,103,112. The A. baumannii UPAB1 strain was shown to cause CAUTIs through a pAB5 plasmid that promotes the expression of chaperone-usher pili (CUP), increasing this bacterium virulence and fibrin(ogen)-dependent biofilms in CAUTIs112 (Supplementary Fig. 2). In a crystallization study, A. baumannii was shown to use two CUP pili, Abp1 and Abp2 (previously known as CUP1 and CUP2), to bind glycoproteins, including fibrin(ogen); the binding to the sugar components of these glycoproteins occurs through large binding pockets on the pili113 (Supplementary Fig. 2c). Interestingly, in another study, mice that resolved a priori A. baumannii uUTI experienced an rUTI when catheterized114, indicating that catheterization alone might induce the emergence of QIRs.

Similar to uUTI, E. coli is also the most prevalent CAUTI uropathogen (~33.5%), according to the National Healthcare Safety Network84. In uUTI, UPEC uses FimH to attach to the urothelium, facilitating IBC formation by binding to mannosylated uroplakins (Supplementary Fig. 2c). In addition to uUTI, FimH is also crucial for UPEC CAUTI, as FimH deletion or mutations affecting the mannose binding site result in an attenuated CAUTI47,115. Similar to UPEC, K. pneumoniae also has a FimH adhesin that could be crucial in causing CAUTIs (Supplementary Fig. 2c); however, this hypothesis must be further investigated42,67,94,96. Unlike what happens in uUTI, IBCs are highly reduced during CAUTI without affecting overall bladder and catheter colonization47,115. This reduction could happen because CAUTI might not need IBCs, owing to the presence of persistent communities on the catheter. Another explanation could be related to high fibrin(ogen) accumulation and deposition on the urothelium, as shown by immunostaining analyses of mouse catheterized bladder67,76,77,92,108,112, which prevents UPEC interaction with the urothelium, in turn inhibiting IBC formation67. Similar to uroplakin, fibrin(ogen) is highly glycosylated and contains a wide variety of sugar residues, including mannose116, which could compete for binding against uroplakin. In fact, fibrin(ogen)-deficient mice and mice with reduced fibrinogen deposition on the catheter undergo UPEC defective colonization on bladders and catheters, respectively, suggesting that UPEC binding to fibrin(ogen) is crucial during CAUTI67,68. These findings suggest that the catheterized environment affects IBC formation and possibly QIR reservoirs by shifting UPEC intracellular colonization behaviour during uUTI towards an extracellular colonization during CAUTI67,68.

Candida.

Candida albicans has emerged as a major CAUTI pathogen (Fig. 2B); however, candiduria (Candida in urine) is one of the most problematic issues in patient management, owing to a lack of evidence-based information on the pathogenicity of Candida spp. in the urinary tract. In fact, whether candiduria results from a contamination or an invasive infection is unclear, which is a conundrum for physicians117119. This situation is further complicated by the undefined laboratory criteria for diagnosis of fungal UTIs, which are different from bacterial UTI, where standardized criteria are available117. Most fungal UTIs occur in hospitalized patients with indwelling catheters120, and candiduria is steadily increasing in catheterized patients in the ICU121124. In a study in mouse models of uUTI and CAUTI, only urinary catheterization was shown to significantly (P < 0.005) promote C. albicans colonization of the bladder and systemic dissemination77. Additionally, the catheterized bladder environment causes Candida to develop an Efg-1-dependent hyphal morphology (which is associated with virulence) and the expression of Als-1 adhesin (mediated by Efg1). Both Efg1 and Als1 are important for persistent CAUTI77: hyphal morphology contributes to immune evasion and invasive colonization, whereas Als1 is crucial for fibrin(ogen)-dependent colonization. Importantly, in the same study, experiments in a mouse model of CAUTI showed that Als1 was overexpressed and contributed to significantly (P < 0.0001) increasing colonization in the bladder, catheter and kidney77. Furthermore, Als1 shares great structural similarity to ClfB and SdrG, which are fibrin(ogen)-binding proteins on staphylococci77,108 (Supplementary Fig. 2d). These mechanisms combined with being a WHO-classified health-threatening fungal pathogen125 makes Candida spp. dangerous pathogens.

Current reporting of Candida spp. in CAUTIs is limited. In 2022, a WHO report classified C. albicans as a major fungal threat126. Additionally, Candidozyma auris is also a great threat, and has increasingly been isolated from urine from patients, indicating the potential of C. auris as a urinary pathogen127. However, to our knowledge, no studies investigating C. auris pathophysiology in the urinary tract are currently available. Additionally, in 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and National Healthcare Safety Network guidelines removed Candida spp. as a causative agent of UTIs, probably because typical symptoms of UTIs such as fever, leucocytosis and decreased renal function are not useful in distinguishing fungal infections, and symptoms are crucial for diagnosing a CAUTI128. Results from a 2015 study in which urinalysis was carried out in 1,408 catheterized patients showed that Candida was the second most common pathogen. Among 146 catheterized patients with candiduria, 36% had fever and 33% had leukocyturia (these symptoms are not mutually exclusive). Overall, 64% (n = 93) of patients remained asymptomatic for both fever and leukocyturia, and therefore, did not receive treatment for Candida infections128. Lack of treatment in these patients is unfortunate because in another study, patients with candiduria were shown to have higher in-hospital mortality rates than patients without (49% versus 37%)129. In addition, a high incidence of fungal CAUTIs are reported in patients in the ICU who are under medication, including opioids, that could mask symptoms130, indicating that if the patient did have candiduria, the infection would go undetected.

Classical urinalysis based on CFUs could also provide another reason why Candida infections might be difficult to assess, considering that Candida has virulent morphological changes. Candida switch from yeast to virulent hyphal morphology, where filamentous growth is crucial to penetrate host epithelia and cause disease, as opposed to the yeast form, which could be planktonic and is associated with commensalism77. Hyphal morphology was shown to be triggered during urinary catheterization77,131, and in several clinical studies including patients with candiduria, C. albicans biofilms with hyphal morphology were detected on catheters90,132135. Thus, the fungal burden might be underestimated, as hyphal cells are sticky multinucleated cells, leading to one colony per hyphae and less planktonic yeast in urine than that caused by biofilm-bound hyphal fungi. In skin infections, PCR has been used to improve detection of Candida and virulence factors as opposed to CFU counts90,136. This shift also highlights the importance of proper diagnostic tools and protocols for CAUTI diagnosis to prevent downstream systemic dissemination.

Before 2015 CDC guideline changes, fungal UTI accounted for 15% of CAUTIs, making it the second most common CAUTI, just after UPEC. Removing fungal pathogens as UTI causative agents has not decreased the prevalence of these pathogens in the USA or other countries. Results from a longitudinal study showed that candiduria remained highly prevalent over a 10-year period, with no decrease observed in the ratio of urine samples positive for Candida137, indicating no significant decline (P > 0.050) in the prevalence of candiduria (Fig. 1). Additionally, in this study, analysis of urine samples collected from catheterized inpatient wards showed that among Candida species, C. albicans was the primary isolated pathogen (60–65%)137. In a 2021 clinical study, the prevalence of candiduria reported in patients in the ICU was significantly (P < 0.004, OR 3.025, 95% CI 1.437–6.369) linked to indwelling catheters alone138, different from hospitalized patients who have candiduria associated with other factors including age, other malignancies, parenteral nutrition, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, or even antibiotics use138. These factors also contribute to Candida-related bloodstream infections and mortality139. Interestingly, antibiotics use has been linked to an increased prevalence of Candida infections, probably owing to shifts in the microbiota139 that normally control Candida overgrowth. Candiduria caused by catheterization could lead to severe outcomes if untreated; thus, a comprehensive multi-site study in which advanced diagnostic methodologies for candiduria are used is crucial.

Overall, many reasons potentially explain why Candida infections are a menace to hospital settings and CAUTIs, including the fact that 33–55% of all candidaemia instances occur in the ICU; the evidence that many patients in the ICU are under opioid pain medication140; the lack of reliable fungal UTI diagnoses; and inadequate or no treatment at all for fungal CAUTI infections. These conditions unfortunately lead to a persistent fungal colonization with virulent morphologies and an increased likelihood of septic shock, and to high 30-day mortality141. Thus, future research and improved reporting are required to understand the infection landscape of fungal CAUTIs.

Polymicrobial infections.

Infections are considered polymicrobial when two or more pathogens are cultured from the same sample or from two different samples within 4 days. During UTI diagnostics, when mixed microbes are recovered, the most abundant pathogen (≥105 CFUs/ml)84,88,89 is considered the causative agent, whereas the other microbes are classified as contaminants142. A big problem with this approach is that several uropathogens, including E. faecalis, S. aureus and C. albicans, are not motile and predominantly reside in a biofilm community, whereas uropathogens that are motile, including E. coli, K. pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and P. mirabilis, could be represented in urine samples in higher titres. Patients with negative or inconclusive urine cultures, and even under antimicrobial treatment, were shown to have high catheter colonization by multiple uropathogens73,9096. Therefore, to date, diagnoses based on urine culture have not provided a full picture of the uropathogens present, leading to inadequate antibiotics treatment100102, and potentially contributing to antimicrobial resistance or even urosepsis. Unfortunately, infections with polymicrobial bacteraemia lead to elevated mortality rates (25%) compared with mono-microbial bacteraemia (15–18%)93,143. In a clinical study including patients with prolonged catheterization, up to 97% of urine samples were shown to have polymicrobial infections93. Different from uUTIs, which are primarily (~95%) monomicrobial144, CAUTIs are often polymicrobial (~75%)91,93. Results from both in vitro studies and analysis of clinical samples suggested that many biofilms on urinary catheters are composed of polymicrobial communities145,146. Results from another study including 19 participants with urinary catheterization over the course of 30 weeks showed that E. faecalis and P. mirabilis were present together 47% of the time, whereas E. faecalis was present 95% of the time and P. mirabilis 58% of the time. These two bacteria were shown to be early colonizers in patients, with persistent colonization throughout 30 weeks92. Results from another study in which 366 catheter and urine samples from patients with prolonged catheterization were analysed showed that ~80% of samples were polymicrobial91. Interestingly, in this study, co-localization of E. faecalis and E. coli was also shown to be potentially beneficial, as these two bacteria consistently co-occurred on catheters throughout the study. Notably, E. faecalis co-occurrence might also be beneficial to various pathogens and lead to persistent infections, as observed in other polymicrobial settings. For instance, E. faecalis is an early colonizer of the neonatal gut, where microbial diversity is crucial, and contributes to the development of healthy immune and metabolic systems147. Similarly, E. faecalis is an early colonizer in urinary catheters, and has the ability to modulate the bladder environment to benefit itself and possibly other pathogens. This ability might explain why E. faecalis is frequently found in both monomicrobial and polymicrobial infections during acute and prolonged catheterization92.

Differences between uncomplicated and catheter-associated urinary tract infection pathophysiology and aetiology

uUTIs and CAUTIs share many common aspects in both pathophysiology and aetiology. For example, pathogens in both conditions must travel through the urethra to infect the bladder. A major difference between these two conditions is that CAUTI pathogens might access the bladder owing to catheter microbial contamination, whereas UPEC migrate through the urethra by using the flagella to ascend to the bladder during uUTIs4,14 (Table 1, Fig. 2). In fact, UPEC is the major causative agent in both uUTI and CAUTI; however, UPEC prevalence in uUTI is 75–95% whereas UPEC prevalence is reduced to ~33.5% in CAUTI148. uUTI affects otherwise healthy bladders; thus, the infection onset is dependent on the virulence of UPEC, whereas CAUTIs seem to be driven by catheterization alone. Specifically, considering that IBCs are lower in CAUTIs than in uUTIs, UPEC might have a different binding mechanism in CAUTIs compared with known uUTI mechanisms but still use same binding adhesins. Regarding pathogen diversity, catheter-induced damage to the bladder — or the clinical diagnosis leading to catheterization — might predispose patients to a more diverse range of organisms than uncatheterized patients. Patients with CAUTI have high pathogen prevalence and complex clinical presentation; thus, symptoms of infection in these patients might be similar to or different from symptoms reported in patients with uUTI, or might be masked in patients with CAUTI.

Similarities of symptoms in uncomplicated and catheter-associated urinary tract infections

A positive UTI diagnosis includes a positive urine culture (≥105 CFU) and the presentation of at least one symptom (Fig. 1). Both uUTIs and CAUTIs can present with similar symptoms such as dysuria (painful urination), increased frequency and urgency of urination, suprapubic pain and haematuria64,86,149155. A major problem in diagnosing CAUTI is that the majority of patients with a urinary catheter are undergoing surgery or have an underlying chronic condition, and require medications that could mask the symptoms. Opioids are common pain medications alongside NSAIDs and acetaminophen during surgery and post-procedure156. Furthermore, chronic conditions prevalent in catheterized patients, such as comatose state, neurogenic bladders, SCIs, incontinence and urine flow obstruction, can present with symptoms that might overlap with or mask those of a UTI. For instance, UTI symptoms are not pronounced in patients with neurogenic bladders or SCIs owing to dysfunctional brain–bladder communication and underlying nerve damage affecting bladder sensation157. Consequently, current UTI diagnosis criteria have important caveats, particularly for CAUTIs. Catheterized patients might experience reduced UTI symptoms owing to medication or chronic diseases. Additionally, CAUTI pathophysiology is dependent on biofilms, which reduce planktonic microbial CFUs, potentially leading to false-negative diagnosis, as supported by clinical observations90. Furthermore, the duration of catheter-induced bladder damage, which provides an ideal environment for CAUTI pathogens, remains unclear after catheter removal.

Risk factors and comorbidities associated with urinary tract infections

UTIs area common concernin healthcare that can affect just about anyone. Understanding risk factors is important for effective prevention, detection and early treatment to prevent any associated sequelae. Risk factors can range from daily lifestyle choices such as hygiene, sexual intercourse or hydration to gender and health comorbidities associated with age and health158 (Box 1). Some risk factors are similar in uUTI and CAUTI; for example, the incidence of both types of infection is increased in patients with diabetes mellitus or a weakened immune system, and in older adults (≥65 years old)159. Yet, how these risk factors are associated with the infection type might be different. For example, older patients might have hormonal changes that can contribute to increased uUTIs but also have age-related issues that contribute to increased rates of catheterization that lead to infections.

Box 1 |. Risk factors for urinary tract infections.

Uncomplicated urinary tract infections
 • Abnormal urination (for example, incomplete emptying, or neurogenic bladder)162
 • Abnormal anatomical structures that promote recurrent infections162
 • Previous antibiotics usage161,162
 • Age (young and postmenopausal women)55,161,162
 • Birth control
 • Cystocele162
 • Dehydration162
 • Diabetes mellitus55,162
 • Diarrhoea162
 • Female urethra, which is shorter than the male one55,162
 • First urinary tract infection before 15 years of age162
 • Frequent pelvic examinations162
 • Immunocompromise55,162
 • Irritable bowel syndrome162
 • Menopause162
 • Mother with a history of multiple urinary tract infections162
 • New or multiple sexual partners162
 • Obesity161
 • Poor personal hygiene162
 • Pregnancy162
 • Sexual intercourse162
 • Urinary tract calculi162
 • Use of spermicides and diaphragms162
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections
 • Urinary catheterization73,159
 • Duration of catheterization
 • Improper handling
 • Cerebrovascular disease218
 • Chronic kidney disease219
 • Cognitive impairment85
 • Diabetes mellitus73,170
 • Fibrinolytic deficienciesa
 • Congenital malignanciesa
 • Acquired through anti-fibrinolyticsa
 • Hypertension170
 • Neurogenic bladder159
 • Paraplegia or mobility issues85,218
 • Weakened immune system159
a

Mouse model only, not verified with clinical data.

Risk factors of uncomplicated urinary tract infections

Being able to understand individual and population risk factors55,160162 (Box 1) associated with increased prevalence of uUTIs is important for predicting infection in susceptible populations and tailoring prophylactic therapies that might better suit individual patients159. Women are more predisposed to developing uUTIs than men, and some known risk factors associated with gender include anatomy, menopause, birth control, pregnancy and host genetics158 (Box 1). Specifically, hormones might be crucial contributors to infections. In fact, fluctuation levels of circulating oestrogen in women have been shown to contribute to UTI incidence, as oestrogen receptors on bladder cells can modulate inflammatory cytokines in response to infections through the upregulation of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) signalling163. Additionally, obesity and diabetes mellitus are associated with both initial UTIs and increased incidence of rUTIs159 (Box 1).

Importantly, despite the high clinical burden of rUTIs, a limited number of epidemiological studies focusing on rUTIs is available. Results from a 5-year study including ~375,000 women with UTI showed that ~14% of these women had rUTIs, indicating that rUTIs are common, affecting about 1 in 7 women with a UTI, and poses a clinical problem164. Characteristics associated with rUTIs affecting young adults and elderly include diabetes mellitus, frequent emergency room visits, frequent antibiotics use, oral contraceptives and antibiotic-resistant organisms. Prophylactic antibiotics are the cornerstone of reducing rUTI events165. However, the adverse effects of continuous antibiotics use on patient health are now starting to being understood, and include lung and liver toxicity, disturbance to the gastrointestinal tract and skin rashes165. Non-antibiotic prophylaxis could be a valid alternative; one example could be D-mannosides, which prevent UPEC adhesion and subsequent infection47,165.

Risk factors and comorbidities associated with catheter-associated urinary tract infections

Unlike uUTIs, CAUTIs are not associated with age or gender, as catheterization alone predisposes hosts to developing a CAUTI, which increases with dwell time73. CAUTI prevention and treatment are associated with major challenges owing to the diverse pathogens (bacteria and fungi) that can cause mono-microbial and poly-microbial CAUTIs, and increasing antimicrobial resistance to these pathogens. Currently, consensus on best practice for CAUTI treatment is lacking. A major challenge is to predict when patients will develop CAUTIs and which populations are at risk of urosepsis. This prediction is crucial, as 25% of sepsis instances derive from urinary isolates. Thus, identification of patient populations with increased susceptibility to CAUTI and urosepsis will enable clinicians to improve patient monitoring to mitigate CAUTI incidence, morbidity and mortality (Box 1). For example, fibrinolytic deficiencies in mice have been associated with increased CAUTI severity68, and results from retrospective clinical studies showed an association between diabetes mellitus and hypertension, with increased incidences of CAUTIs. Understanding these associations could be used to identify patients at risk of CAUTI and CAUTI-dependent urosepsis to improve prognosis and outcomes of infection.

Unnecessary catheterization

Notably, many catheterizations are unnecessary, and result in an increase in CAUTI incidences, as catheterization alone predisposes patients to developing an infection36. A total of ~25% of all outpatients receive a catheter, and ~20–50% of catheters are unnecessary166. Instead of placing indwelling urinary catheters for appropriate reasons — such as for perioperative care, urinary bladder obstruction, or prolonged immobilization — patients are often catheterized as a replacement for nursing care, a means of collecting urine when a patient cannot void voluntarily, or for unindicated prolonged postoperative care; in addition, health care providers frequently forget to remove urinary catheters166. Patients with geriatric problems — including immobility, falls without hip fracture or patients with bed rest orders — and patients with cognitive impairment are at a high risk of being unnecessarily catheterized85. To tackle unnecessary prolonged urinary catheterization, the US guidelines recommend replacing a catheter when certain conditions are met — such as when the catheter has been in place for a specific duration or if signs of infection are present — rather than solely based on urine output167. Yet, results from a subsequent observational study indicate no improvement in infection outcome when replacing urinary catheters in individuals with long-term indwelling catheters168. One potential reason why replacing a catheter might be ineffective is that the host proteins that enable infection, such as fibrin(ogen), are still present in the bladder between catheter changes; thus, the remaining urothelial fibrin(ogen)-dependent biofilms could seed the subsequent infection37. To reduce the onset of CAUTIs, medical practitioners recommend reducing catheterization time by limiting the use of urinary catheters to essential medical needs, and when pertinent. In addition, urinary catheterization should be carried out under aseptic conditions, followed by regular catheter care and removal16. Despite these measures, CAUTI incidences remain high.

Fibrinolytic deficiencies

CAUTI prognosis is associated with host comorbidities including compromise urodynamics, host defences, cognitive impairment, as well as other risk factors that are also associated with uUTIs, such as diabetes mellitus and age (Box 1). Urinary catheterization is a primary risk factor for CAUTI, but the exact mechanisms by which these comorbidities exacerbate CAUTI severity and contribute to CAUTI-related urosepsis remain unclear. Several studies in the past decade have shown that catheter-induced bladder damage emerged as a crucial factor for promoting CAUTI. Results from clinical and animal studies have shown that fibrin(ogen) has a crucial role in establishing and maintaining CAUTIs. Importantly, results from a study in a mouse model of CAUTI showed that removal of fibrin during fibrinolysis is essential in decreasing bacterial burden during catheterization. Any deficiencies in fibrinolysis that cause fibrin accumulation resulted in exacerbated pathogen burden in the catheterized bladder environment and led to increased septicaemia68. This phenomenon was observed withy both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and fungi as well68. Moreover, in this study, catheterized mice treated with the antifibrinolytic agent tranexamic acid showed increased fibrin accumulation in the bladder, exacerbated monomicrobial and polymicrobial CAUTI, and systemic dissemination of UPEC, E. faecalis and C. albicans68. Antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid or ε-aminocaproic acid169 are commonly used in patients with bleeding disorders and in patients with traumatic injuries, or patients undergoing surgical procedures that increase bleeding risk, including liver transplants, cardiac and caesarean surgeries. As 86% of patients undergoing surgery require urinary catheterization68, catheterized patients under antifibrinolytic therapy or with genetic fibrinolytic deficiencies might be at an increased risk of severe and persistent CAUTI and serious bacterial infections. An in-depth retrospective analysis of patient medical history, specifically examining patients who developed CAUTIs that led to urosepsis, is required to elucidate the association between CAUTI prognosis, development and comorbidities.

Other possible comorbidities

Many comorbidities that have not yet been identified might also be associated with coagulopathies. For example, hypertension and diabetes mellitus have a strong association with CAUTI incidence170. These diseases are highly prevalent in low-income countries and primarily affect Hispanic and Black individuals in the USA171, who have an increased incidence of HAI primarily owing to increased rates of CAUTIs172. Thus, race and ethnicity could have an important role in identifying patients at a high risk of developing CAUTIs and understanding the comorbidities associated with these sub-populations could help to predict which patients are likely to develop CAUTIs.

Diabetes mellitus and other metabolic disorders can impair immune function, slow healing and modulate haemostasis and coagulation, in turn leading to increased fibrin(ogen), increased hypofibrinolysis or decreased removal of fibrin. For example, conditions such as platelet insensitivity, increased platelet counts in patients with hyperglycaemia, as well as coagulation disorders, can lead to blood clots that are resistant to fibrinolysis173. Specifically, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have decreased plasminogen activation174. Increased levels of glucose also have direct effects on plasmin, as hyperglycaemic environments might enhance plasminogen glycation and, therefore, also inhibit plasmin activation173, which can increase CAUTI severity. Importantly, plasminogen activation factors return to normal levels under euglycaemia treatments174, highlighting the importance of proper medication and treatment in preventing impaired fibrinolysis and possibly reducing the onset and clearance of CAUTI. Diabetes-derived increased glucose levels might also be used by pathogens as a nutrient source in an otherwise nutrient-depleted environment such as that found in the urinary bladder, and can lead to CAUTIs in an otherwise healthy bladder.

Treatment and prevention strategies

Distinguishing between uUTIs and CAUTIs is crucial for clinicians and researchers to effectively develop and select treatments. These treatments should be tailored to the specific infection, considering pathogen presentation, virulence mechanisms, patient comorbidity and other risk factors. Antibiotics, empirically prescribed based on urine culture reports, are the most common treatment for UTIs, but other approaches are also being developed, and include antibiotics designed for complicated UTIs, catheter modifications to prevent CAUTIs, and other antibiotic-sparing therapeutics. Novel strategies to mitigate infections can substantially improve patient outcomes, decrease overall UTI prevalence and reduce the rate of antibiotic resistance to uropathogens.

Antibiotics

Currently, both uUTIs and CAUTIs are typically treated with antibiotics175. The antibiotic choice is guided by the specific pathogen involved and its resistance pattern, but a broad-spectrum antibiotic is also often prescribed37. Antibiotic therapy is often initiated based on local antibiograms until culture results are available176. Additionally, antibiotic treatment varies depending on the severity of the infection (including acute or chronic cystitis, rUTIs, pyelonephritis or urosepsis) or patient conditions (such as pregnancy or allergies)177 (Fig. 1). For example, a patient with uUTI is usually prescribed trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP–SMX) for 3 days at a dose of 160/800 mg orally178. However, TMP–SMX treatment for patients with CAUTI has been shown to fail in ~60% of instances18. Instead, treatment with fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin, which are typically prescribed orally for 5–7 days at 500–1,000-mg doses, has been associated with reduced onset of CAUTI and lower failure rates than TMP–SMX in patients with CAUTI82,177. Two new antibiotics, gepotidacin and tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide, which have been assessed in completed phase III clinical trials, have shown efficacy for the treatment of uUTI and complicated UTI respectively158. Additionally, antibiotics are also starting to be used specifically to address the multidrug resistance in complicated UTIs, which occurs, for example, in CAUTI. For example, a LepB inhibitor developed by Genentech, which showed in vitro activity against broad Gram-negative bacteria, is currently being assessed in a phase I, randomized, double-blind, single ascending dose clinical trial to assess the safety in healthy individuals after determining low frequency of spontaneous resistance in preclinical stages179. For urosepsis, intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as beta-lactams (piperacillin), third-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides are recommended180. However, results from a cohort study showed that early transition to oral antibiotics within 4 days of initial blood culture might be an effective alternative to prolonged intravenous antibiotics treatment in individuals with uncomplicated Gram-negative bacteraemia181. The length of antimicrobial treatment for Gram-negative bacteraemia is debated, as most guidelines recommend a duration between 7 and 14 days for uncomplicated instances, but results from a systemic review of randomized controlled trials comparing antibiotics treatment of ≤7 days to treatment durations of >7 days suggested that shorter courses might be equally effective182. However, in cases of complicated UTIs, the antimicrobial treatment might be extended to 21 days, depending on the pathogen, drug-resistance profile and patients’ allergies180.

Patients with CAUTIs must receive antibiotics treatment tailored to urine culture results16, as antibiotics use can alter the microflora that is able to colonize the catheterized bladder. For instance, previous antibiotics use can exacerbate fungal pathogen prevalence in catheterized patients134 or even promote the presence of pathogens that are already antibiotic resistant and eliminate beneficial bacteria that normally help to protect patients against infections. As an example, E. faecalis is inherently resistant to many antimicrobials including penicillin and ampicillin, cephalosporins, clindamycin, aminoglycosides and TMP–SMX183; thus, treatment with antibiotics will lead to clearance of other pathogens and promote proliferation of multidrug-resistant enterococci. Additionally, acquired vancomycin resistance of enterococci makes this pathogen extremely dangerous, especially in European hospitals, where vancomycin resistance is highly prevalent183.

Catheter modifications

Current research has led to novel catheters that reduce infections by preventing biofilm formation, including catheters loaded with antimicrobial agents, and the use of materials with antimicrobial properties, as well as soft materials75. Antifouling coatings decrease infections by repelling biofilm formation on the catheter surfaces. Biofilms are crucial for CAUTI pathogenesis; thus, antifouling coatings constitute a promising strategy to prevent infection onset. These antifouling coating modifications include hydrogels, poly(tetrafluoroethylene), polyzwitterions, polyethylene glycol and liquid silicone infusion75. For example, a newly developed novel liquid infused (LIS) catheter with anti-fouling properties decreased biofilm formation from fibrin(ogen) and decreased microbial adhesion to catheters compared with unmodified catheters67 in a mouse model of CAUTI. These LIS catheters resulted in reduced colonization on catheters and bladders and systemic dissemination by six different uropathogens, including UPEC, E. faecalis, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and C. albicans67. Furthermore, LIS catheters reduced CAUTI and also catheter-induced inflammation, which is a hallmark of CAUTI67. Thus, LIS catheters hold great potential for the development of lasting, effective and antibiotic-sparing intervention for CAUTI.

Other catheter modifications include equipping catheters with antimicrobial coatings to target microorganism growth by inhibiting microbial protein synthesis, targeting the cell wall and regulating metabolic pathways. Examples of these coatings include silver ions, nanoparticles, antibiotics, antimicrobial peptides and bacteriophages75. Bacteriophages provide a great alternative tool to traditional antimicrobial therapies owing to high specificity, accuracy and, possibly, efficacy. Lytic phages can target and degrade biofilm extracellular matrix through secreted lytic enzymes that enable these phages to reach the host bacteria and lyse cells184. Other pathogen-specific treatments include antibody-based therapies for E. faecalis and E. faecium targeting EbpA76. In a study in which FimH-binding mannose analogues (mannosides) were used to treat UPEC CAUTIs,47 mannosides alone were shown to decrease bladder colonization and improve the effect of antibiotics47, highlighting both the mechanism of infections used by uropathogens and how understanding this mechanism can lead to novel approaches to combating infections.

Currently, the only catheter modifications commercially available are hydrogel-coated, silver-coated, hydrophilic-coated, pre-lubricated and poly(tetrafluoroethylene)-coated catheters185. Yet, the efficacy of these catheters in the clinic has yielded mixed results. For example, in some studies, silver-coated and hydrogel-coated catheters showed no difference in preventing CAUTIs, whereas in other studies, these modified catheters reduced CAUTIs by 35–47% compared with non-coated catheters186,187. Additionally, in two small clinical studies including patients with long-term catheterization, the effect of probiotic-coated catheters was investigated, also with mixed results. In one study, a reduction in annual UTI rates was observed, with patients experiencing ~1.5 fewer infections per year than at baseline75. Conversely, in the second study, no alterations in UTI rates were identified following the transition from unmodified to probiotic-coated catheters187. Certainly, further research is required to test the efficacy of different catheter modifications as well as to assess associated risks in patients.

Other non-antimicrobial prevention strategies

Patients with uUTIs are encouraged to increase fluid intake to flush out bacteria, and are also prescribed pain relievers to manage symptoms. Notably, this strategy might lead to inhibition of COX2, as over-the- counter pain relievers such as ibuprofen, acetaminophen, naproxen and aspirin can inhibit COX2 (ref. 188), which is a mechanism contributing to rUTIs. Several other strategies that have shown promise for UTI treatment include anti-adhesives such as analogues of sugars including mannosidases and galactosides, which target UPEC pili adhesins FimH and Fiml, respectively; AKB-4924, which promotes host-cell hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α) stabilization, decreasing urothelial invasion; lactoferrin, which enhances the innate immune response against UPEC; and probiotics, which were shown to reduce infection frequency in patients with rUTI46.

Home remedies and other non-antibiotic strategies have been explored for UTI prevention and treatment. For example, cranberry products such as cranberry (juice or capsules) have been studied for their potential to treat UTIs. A meta-analysis of 24 studies showed no reduction in symptomatic UTIs from cranberry products, although these products have been shown to be a viable option for pregnant women with asymptomatic bacteriuria178. Cranberry active ingredients (fructose and proanthocyanidin) and D-mannose have been shown to inhibit UPEC binding to urothelial cells by blocking FimH158. Yet, evidence of cranberry and D-mannose effectiveness in the clinic is inconclusive. For example, in a clinical trial in which cranberry juice or a placebo beverage was given (in equal volumes) to women with a history of recent UTIs (within the 6 months before enrolment), a significantly lower total number of UTI incidents (P = 0.016) were reported in the cranberry group189. However, in another study, no difference in rUTI incidence was observed in patients with UTI receiving high doses (18.5 mg) of proanthocyanidin compared with individuals receiving a low dose (1 mg)190. Similarly, clinical trials assessing the efficacy of D-mannose in preventing and treating UTIs have shown contradictory results. Results from a systematic review of seven clinical trials showed some preventative benefit from D-mannose intervention191. However, results from other clinical trials suggest no reduction in the total UTI incidence compared with a matched volume of placebo powder158,192. Methenamine hippurate, an antiseptic, has shown clinical efficacy as a preventive treatment for uUTIs158. Results from one study, in which urine samples from women with UTIs were analysed, showed that methenamine treatment decreased urothelial permeability, indicating improved barrier function against infections158; however, additional studies are needed to validate the effectiveness of this agent.

People using intermittent urinary catheters are also at risk of developing UTI. Patients reuse disposable catheters for financial or accessibility reasons; however, when cleaned inappropriately, catheters can harbour microbes193. Catheter flushes and no-touch catheters have been developed to decrease microbial contamination and biofilm formation, to offset the financial cost of intermittent catheters, and to reduce UTIs193. For example, the Aurie system (formerly known as CathBuddy created by Aurie) was developed as a purpose-built catheter washer-disinfector system to remove pathogens from a novel no-touch intermittent reusable urinary catheter. In a preclinical study, the Aurie system effectively reduced the bacterial attachment of E. coli and P. aeruginosa, as well as biofilm formation, on catheters with established polymicrobial biofilms for up to 100 repeat cycles193. Overall, efficiently removing pathogens from reusable catheters could serve as a great cost-effective tool in reducing UTI, although additional studies are certainly needed to confirm the efficacy of this approach.

Conclusions

uUTIs and CAUTIs have many common characteristics including symptomology and care. However, most CAUTI treatments are based on uUTI treatments, and prove to be ineffective in fully treating CAUTIs. This phenomenon is primarily ascribed to the existing differences between uUTIs and CAUTIs, including differences in pathophysiology and onset of infection, the increased diversity of pathogens that can cause CAUTIs and the mechanisms through which pathogens modulate host immunity to amplify virulence. Thus, therapies tailored to CAUTIs are urgently needed. In order to develop these treatments, additional research on CAUTIs is encouraged to have an improved understanding of both pathogen virulence and host responses.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-025-01065-z.

Key points.

  • Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are an extremely common diagnosis in the USA and globally.

  • Uncomplicated and catheter-associated UTIs differ greatly in pathogen diversity, pathophysiology and propensity towards secondary bloodstream infections.

  • New treatments for catheter-associated UTIs should be specifically designed for these infections, rather than simply adapted from therapies for uncomplicated UTIs To reduce antibiotic resistance among urinary pathogens, modern treatments and preventative strategies can be designed to target specific mechanisms used by uropathogens to cause different types of UTI.

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Urology thanks Florian Wagenlehner, Sharyl Justice and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

References

  • 1.Tandogdu Z et al. Urosepsis 30-day mortality, morbidity, and their risk factors: SERPENS study, a prospective, observational multi-center study. World J. Urol 42, 314 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kuehn BM Some progress in effort to reduce hospital-acquired infections. JAMA 311, 1488 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Klevens RM et al. Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S. hospitals, 2002. Public. Health Rep 122, 160–166 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Foxman B Urinary tract infection syndromes: occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infect. Dis. Clin. North. Am 28, 1–13 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Werneburg GT Catheter-associated urinary tract infections: current challenges and future prospects. Res. Rep. Urol 14, 109–133 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang X et al. Disease burden and long-term trends of urinary tract infections: a worldwide report. Front. Public. Health 10, 888205 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M & Hultgren SJ Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 13, 269–284 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Medina M & Castillo-Pino E An introduction to the epidemiology and burden of urinary tract infections. Ther. Adv. Urol 11, 1756287219832172 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Urinary Tract Infections Basics. CDC; https://www.cdc.gov/uti/about/index.html (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Czajkowski K, Bros-Konopielko M & Teliga-Czajkowska J Urinary tract infection in women. Prz. Menopauzalny 20, 40–47 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pujades-Rodriguez M, West RM, Wilcox MH & Sandoe J Lower urinary tract infections: management, outcomes and risk factors for antibiotic re-prescription in primary care. EClinicalMedicine 14, 23–31 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Koh SWC et al. Antibiotic treatment failure of uncomplicated urinary tract infections in primary care. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 12, 73 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McLellan LK & Hunstad DA Urinary tract infection: pathogenesis and outlook. Trends Mol. Med 22, 946–957 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Flores-Mireles A, Hreha TN & Hunstad DA Pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Top. Spinal Cord. Inj. Rehabil 25, 228–240 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wagenlehner FME et al. Epidemiology, definition and treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. Nat. Rev. Urol 17, 586–600 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lo E et al. Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol 35, 464–479 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jacobsen SM, Stickler DJ, Mobley HL & Shirtliff ME Complicated catheter-associated urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev 21, 26–59 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Langford BJ et al. Antibiotic selection and duration for catheter-associated urinary tract infection in non-hospitalized older adults: a population-based cohort study. Antimicrob. Steward. Healthc. Epidemiol 3, e132 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Paul R State of the globe: rising antimicrobial resistance of pathogens in urinary tract infection. J. Glob. Infect. Dis 10, 117–118 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haider MZ & Annamaraju P Bladder Catheterization. StatPearls [Internet] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560748 (updated 9 August 2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wilson Dib R et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital-acquired infections at a comprehensive cancer center. Am. J. Infect. Control 51, 1302–1308 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID-19 Impact on Healthcare-associated Infections. CDC; https://www.cdc.gov/healthcare-associated-infections/php/data/covid-impact.html (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Parker D et al. Nursing interventions to reduce the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Part 1: catheter selection. J. Wound Ostomy Cont. Nurs 36, 23–34 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jarrell AS et al. Short-duration treatment for catheter-associated urinary tract infections in critically ill trauma patients. J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg 79, 649–653 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Willson M et al. Nursing interventions to reduce the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection: part 2: staff education, monitoring, and care techniques. J. Wound Ostomy Cont. Nurs 36, 137–154 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Maki DG & Tambyah PA Engineering out the risk for infection with urinary catheters. Emerg. Infect. Dis 7, 342–347 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kunin CM, Douthitt S, Dancing J, Anderson J & Moeschberger M The association between the use of urinary catheters and morbidity and mortality among elderly patients in nursing homes. Am. J. Epidemiol 135, 291–301 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dreger NM, Degener S, Ahmad-Nejad P, Wobker G & Roth S Urosepsis — etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Dtsch. Arztebl Int 112, 837–847 (2015). quiz 848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rosenthal VD et al. Time-dependent analysis of length of stay and mortality due to urinary tract infections in ten developing countries: INICC findings. J. Infect 62, 136–141 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Trautner BW & Darouiche RO Catheter-associated infections: pathogenesis affects prevention. Arch. Intern. Med 164, 842–850 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tambyah PA & Oon J Catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis 25, 365–370 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Warren JW Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect. Dis. Clin. North. Am 11, 609–622 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Johnson JR, Kuskowski MA & Wilt TJ Systematic review: antimicrobial urinary catheters to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in hospitalized patients. Ann. Intern. Med 144, 116–126 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tambyah PA & Maki DG Catheter-associated urinary tract infection is rarely symptomatic — a prospective study of 1497 catheterized patients. Arch. Intern. Med 160, 678–682 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tambyah PA, Knasinski V & Maki DG The direct costs of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the era of managed care. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol 23, 27–31 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Morgan DJ et al. Does nonpayment for hospital-acquired catheter-associated urinary tract infections lead to overtesting and increased antimicrobial prescribing? Clin. Infect. Dis 55, 923–929 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gould CV et al. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol 31, 319–326 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ling ML et al. APSIC guide for prevention of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). Antimicrobial Resistance Infect. Control. 12, 52 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Saint S et al. Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the United States a national comparative study. JAMA Intern. Med 173, 874–879 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Carter AE et al. Evaluation of CAUTI-reduction strategies and associated reduction in CAUTI rate and catheter utilization at a large academic medical center. Am. J. Infect. Control 51, S51 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hayes BW & Abraham SN Innate immune responses to bladder infection. Microbiol. Spectr 10.1128/microbiolspec.uti-0024-2016 (2016). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ding Y, Wang H, Pu S, Huang S & Niu S Resistance trends of Klebsiella pneumoniae causing urinary tract infections in Chongqing, 2011–2019. Infect. Drug. Resist 14, 475–481 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ronald A The etiology of urinary tract infection: traditional and emerging pathogens. Dis. Mon 49, 71–82 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.DeRosa A et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility trends for urinary isolates in the veteran population. Am. J. Infect. Control 49, 576–581 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schembri MA, Nhu NTK & Phan M-D Gut–bladder axis in recurrent UTI. Nat. Microbiol 7, 601–602 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Klein RD & Hultgren SJ Urinary tract infections: microbial pathogenesis, host-pathogen interactions and new treatment strategies. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 18, 211–226 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Guiton PS et al. Combinatorial small-molecule therapy prevents uropathogenic Escherichia coli catheter-associated urinary tract infections in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 56, 4738–4745 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Abraham SN & Miao Y The nature of immune responses to urinary tract infections. Nat. Rev. Immunol 15, 655–663 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Song J et al. A novel TLR4-mediated signaling pathway leading to IL-6 responses in human bladder epithelial cells. PLoS Pathog 3, e60 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ching CB et al. Interleukin-6/Stat3 signaling has an essential role in the host antimicrobial response to urinary tract infection. Kidney Int 93, 1320–1329 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dixit A et al. Frontline science: proliferation of Ly6C+ monocytes during urinary tract infections is regulated by IL-6 trans-signaling. J. Leukoc. Biol 103, 13–22 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hunstad DA, Justice SS, Hung CS, Lauer SR & Hultgren SJ Suppression of bladder epithelial cytokine responses by uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun 73, 3999–4006 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hilbert DW et al. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli dominantly suppress the innate immune response of bladder epithelial cells by a lipopolysaccharide- and Toll-like receptor 4-independent pathway. Microbes Infect 10, 114–121 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yu L et al. Mucosal infection rewires TNFα signaling dynamics to skew susceptibility to recurrence. Elife 8, e46677 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Al Qahtani M et al. The incidence, clinical features and outcome of urinary tract infections in geriatric patients: a prospective longitudinal study. IJID Reg 13, 100469 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.O’Brien VP, Dorsey DA, Hannan TJ & Hultgren SJ Host restriction of Escherichia coli recurrent urinary tract infection occurs in a bacterial strain-specific manner. PLoS Pathog 14, e1007457 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.O’Brien VP et al. A mucosal imprint left by prior Escherichia coli bladder infection sensitizes to recurrent disease. Nat. Microbiol 2, 16196 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.O’Brien VP, Hannan TJ, Schaeffer AJ & Hultgren SJ Are you experienced? Understanding bladder innate immunity in the context of recurrent urinary tract infection. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis 28, 97–105 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Russell SK et al. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli infection-induced epithelial trained immunity impacts urinary tract disease outcome. Nat. Microbiol 8, 875–888 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Huang XZ, Zhu LB, Li ZR & Lin J Bacterial colonization and intestinal mucosal barrier development. World J. Clin. Pediatr 2, 46–53 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hannan TJ et al. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 prevents chronic and recurrent cystitis. EBioMedicine 1, 46–57 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ebrahimzadeh T et al. Urinary prostaglandin E2 as a biomarker for recurrent UTI in postmenopausal women. Life Sci. Alliance 4, e202000948 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bleidorn J, Gagyor I, Kochen MM, Wegscheider K & Hummers-Pradier E Symptomatic treatment (ibuprofen) or antibiotics (ciprofloxacin) for uncomplicated urinary tract infection? — results of a randomized controlled pilot trial. BMC Med 8, 30 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tenke P, Mezei T, Bőde I & Köves B Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Eur. Urol. Suppl 16, 138–143 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Barford JM, Hu Y, Anson K & Coates AR A biphasic response from bladder epithelial cells induced by catheter material and bacteria: an in vitro study of the pathophysiology of catheter related urinary tract infection. J. Urol 180, 1522–1526 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Agra Leite C & Darbellay Farhoumand P [The forgotten urinary catheter]. Rev. Med. Suisse 19, 589–590 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Andersen MJ et al. Inhibiting host-protein deposition on urinary catheters reduces associated urinary tract infections. Elife 11, e75798 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Molina JJ et al. Fibrinolytic-deficiencies predispose hosts to septicemia from a catheter-associated UTI. Nat. Commun 15, 2704 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Liu HY, Prentice EL & Webber MA Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in biofilms. NPJ Antimicrob. Resist 2, 27 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Trautner BW & Darouiche RO Role of biofilm in catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Am. J. Infect. Control. 32, 177–183 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gunardi WD et al. Biofilm-producing bacteria and risk factors (gender and duration of catheterization) characterized as catheter-associated biofilm formation. Int. J. Microbiol 2021, 8869275 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wilks SA, Koerfer VV, Prieto JA, Fader M & Keevil CW Biofilm development on urinary catheters promotes the appearance of viable but nonculturable bacteria. mBio 12, e03584–20 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ramadan R, Omar N, Dawaba M & Moemen D Bacterial biofilm dependent catheter associated urinary tract infections: characterization, antibiotic resistance pattern and risk factors. Egypt. J. Basic. Appl. Sci 8, 64–74 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Soto SM Importance of biofilms in urinary tract infections: new therapeutic approaches. Adv. Biol 2014, 543974 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Andersen MJ & Flores-Mireles AL Urinary catheter coating modifications: the race against catheter-associated infections. Coatings 10, 23 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Flores-Mireles AL et al. Antibody-based therapy for enterococcal catheter-associated urinary tract infections. mBio 7, e01653–16 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.La Bella AA et al. The catheterized bladder environment promotes Efg1- and Als1-dependent Candida albicans infection. Sci. Adv 9, eade7689 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Flores-Mireles AL et al. Fibrinogen release and deposition on urinary catheters placed during urological procedures. J. Urol. 196, 416–421 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Chaudhry R, Killeen RB & Babiker H, M. Physiology, Coagulation Pathways. StatPearls [Internet] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482253/ (updated 2 June 2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Cheung AL & Fischetti VA The role of fibrinogen in staphylococcal adherence to catheters in vitro. J. Infect. Dis 161, 1177–1186 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Bertoglio F et al. Antibodies to coagulase of Staphylococcus aureus crossreact to Efb and reveal different binding of shared fibrinogen binding repeats. Front. Immunol 14, 1221108 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Li Q et al. Fibronectin-/fibrinogen-binding protein (FBPS) is not a critical virulence factor for the Streptococcus suis serotype 2 strain ZY05719. Vet. Microbiol 208, 38–46 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Lapschies AM et al. The type-2 Streptococcus canis M protein SCM-2 binds fibrinogen and facilitates antiphagocytic properties. Front. Microbiol 14, 1228472 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.National Healthcare Safety Network. Device Associated Module: Urinary Tract Infection (Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection [CAUTI] and Non-Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection [UTI]) Events. CDC; https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/7psccauticurrent.pdf (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Holroyd-Leduc JM et al. Risk factors for indwelling urinary catheterization among older hospitalized patients without a specific medical indication for catheterization. J. Patient Saf 1, 201–207 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kaur R & Kaur R Symptoms, risk factors, diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections. Postgrad. Med. J 97, 803–812 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ambite I et al. Molecular determinants of disease severity in urinary tract infection. Nat. Rev. Urol 18, 468–486 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Al Lawati H, Blair BM & Larnard J Urinary tract infections: core curriculum 2024. Am. J. Kidney Dis 83, 90–100 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hay AD et al. The diagnosis of urinary tract infection in young children (DUTY): a diagnostic prospective observational study to derive and validate a clinical algorithm for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in children presenting to primary care with an acute illness. Health Technol. Assess 20, 1–294 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Walker JN et al. High-resolution imaging reveals microbial biofilms on patient urinary catheters despite antibiotic administration. World J. Urol 38, 2237–2245 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Nye TM et al. Microbial co-occurrences on catheters from long-term catheterized patients. Nat. Commun 15, 61 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Gaston JR et al. Enterococcus faecalis polymicrobial interactions facilitate biofilm formation, antibiotic recalcitrance, and persistent colonization of the catheterized urinary tract. Pathogens 9, 835 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Armbruster CE, Brauer AL, Humby MS, Shao J & Chakraborty S Prospective assessment of catheter-associated bacteriuria clinical presentation, epidemiology, and colonization dynamics in nursing home residents. JCI Insight 6, e144775 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Armbruster CE, Prenovost K, Mobley HL & Mody L How often do clinically diagnosed catheter-associated urinary tract infections in nursing homes meet standardized criteria? J. Am. Geriatr. Soc 65, 395–401 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Qin X et al. Efficacy of expanded periurethral cleansing in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infection in comatose patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Crit. Care 28, 162 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Azevedo AS, Almeida C, Melo LF & Azevedo NF Impact of polymicrobial biofilms in catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Crit. Rev. Microbiol 43, 423–439 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Melzer M & Welch C Outcomes in UK patients with hospital-acquired bacteraemia and the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Postgrad. Med. J 89, 329–334 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Wagenlehner FM et al. Diagnosis and management for urosepsis. Int. J. Urol 20, 963–970 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Nasr A State of the globe: catheterizations continue to cultivate urinary infections. J. Glob. Infect. Dis 2, 81–82 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Trautner BW et al. A hospital-site controlled intervention using audit and feedback to implement guidelines concerning inappropriate treatment of catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria. Implement. Sci 6, 41 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Cope M et al. Inappropriate treatment of catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria in a tertiary care hospital. Clin. Infect. Dis 48, 1182–1188 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kizilbash QF, Petersen NJ, Chen GJ, Naik AD & Trautner BW Bacteremia and mortality with urinary catheter-associated bacteriuria. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol 34, 1153–1159 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Flores-Mireles AL, Pinkner JS, Caparon MG & Hultgren SJ EbpA vaccine antibodies block binding of Enterococcus faecalis to fibrinogen to prevent catheter-associated bladder infection in mice. Sci. Transl. Med 6, 254ra127 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ponnuraj K et al. A “dock, lock, and latch” structural model for a staphylococcal adhesin binding to fibrinogen. Cell 115, 217–228 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Thomas S et al. The complex fibrinogen interactions of the Staphylococcus aureus coagulases. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol 9, 106 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Negron O et al. Fibrin(ogen) engagement of S. aureus promotes the host antimicrobial response and suppression of microbe dissemination following peritoneal infection. PLoS Pathog 18, e1010227 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Negron O et al. Fibrinogen γ’ promotes host survival during Staphylococcus aureus septicemia in mice. J. Thromb. Haemost 21, 2277–2290 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Walker JN et al. Catheterization alters bladder ecology to potentiate Staphylococcus aureus infection of the urinary tract. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E8721–E8730 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Heintz BH, Halilovic J & Christensen CL Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal urinary tract infections. Pharmacotherapy 30, 1136–1149 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Jayakumar S et al. Short term urinary catheterized patients in intensive care unit (ICU) — a need to screen. J. Commun. Dis 43, 25–30 (2011). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Xu W et al. Host and bacterial proteases influence biofilm formation and virulence in a murine model of enterococcal catheter-associated urinary tract infection. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 3, 28 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Di Venanzio G et al. Urinary tract colonization is enhanced by a plasmid that regulates uropathogenic Acinetobacter baumannii chromosomal genes. Nat. Commun 10, 2763 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Tamadonfar KO et al. Structure–function correlates of fibrinogen binding by Acinetobacter adhesins critical in catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2212694120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Hazen JE, Di Venanzio G, Hultgren SJ & Feldman MF Catheterization of mice triggers resurgent urinary tract infection seeded by a bladder reservoir of Acinetobacter baumannii. Sci. Transl. Med 15, eabn8134 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Kalas V et al. Evolutionary fine-tuning of conformational ensembles in FimH during host-pathogen interactions. Sci. Adv 3, e1601944 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Adamczyk B, Struwe WB, Ercan A, Nigrovic PA & Rudd PM Characterization of fibrinogen glycosylation and its importance for serum/plasma N-glycome analysis. J. Proteome Res 12, 444–454 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Alfouzan WA & Dhar R Candiduria: evidence-based approach to management, are we there yet? J. Mycol. Med 27, 293–302 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Fisher JF Candiduria: when and how to treat it. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep 2, 523–530 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Hollenbach E To treat or not to treat — critically ill patients with candiduria. Mycoses 51, 12–24 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Sobel JD, Fisher JF, Kauffman CA & Newman CA Candida urinary tract infections — epidemiology. Clin. Infect. Dis 52, S433–S436 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Jain M et al. Candiduria in catheterized intensive care unit patients: emerging microbiological trends. Indian J. Pathol. Microbiol 54, 552–555 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Gharaghani M, Taghipour S, Halvaeezadeh M & Mahmoudabadi AZ Candiduria; a review article with specific data from Iran. Turk. J. Urol 44, 445–452 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Rishpana MS & Kabbin JS Candiduria in catheter associated urinary tract infection with special reference to biofilm production. J. Clin. Diagn. Res 9, DC11–DC13 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Goetz LL, Howard M, Cipher D & Revankar SG Occurrence of candiduria in a population of chronically catheterized patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 48, 51–54 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Parums DV Editorial: the World Health Organization (WHO) fungal priority pathogens list in response to emerging fungal pathogens during the COVID-19 pandemic. Med. Sci. Monit 28, e939088 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Organization, W. H. WHO Fungal Priority Pathogens List to Guide Research, Development and Public Health Action. (World Health Organization, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Griffith N & Danziger L Candida auris urinary tract infections and possible treatment. Antibiotics 9, 898 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Padawer D et al. Catheter-associated candiduria: risk factors, medical interventions, and antifungal susceptibility. Am. J. Infect. Control. 43, e19–e22 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Álvarez-Lerma F et al. Candiduria in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care medical units. Intensive Care Med 29, 1069–1076 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Walder B & Tramer MR Analgesia and sedation in critically ill patients. Swiss Med. Wkly 134, 333–346 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Walker JN et al. High-resolution imaging reveals microbial biofilms on patient urinary catheters despite antibiotic administration. World J. Urol 38, 2237–2245 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Kojic EM & Darouiche RO Candida infections of medical devices. Clin. Microbiol. Rev 17, 255–267 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Azmy M, Nawar N, Mohiedden M & Warille L Electron microscopic assay of bacterial biofilm formed on indwelling urethral catheters. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol 46, 475–484 (2016). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Fisher JF, Kavanagh K, Sobel JD, Kauffman CA & Newman CA Candida urinary tract infection: pathogenesis. Clin. Infect. Dis 52, S437–S451 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Walker JN et al. High-resolution imaging reveals microbial biofilms on patient urinary catheters despite antibiotic administration. World J. Urol 38, 2237–2245 (2018). 2020 Sep. [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Zeller I et al. Detection of fungal pathogens by a new broad range real-time PCR assay targeting the fungal ITS2 region. J. Med. Microbiol 66, 1383–1392 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Gajdacs M, Doczi I, Abrok M, Lazar A & Burian K Epidemiology of candiduria and Candida urinary tract infections in inpatients and outpatients: results from a 10-year retrospective survey. Cent. European J. Urol 72, 209–214 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 138.He Z et al. Candiduria in hospitalized patients: an investigation with the Sysmex UF-1000i urine analyzer. PeerJ 7, e6935 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Li H et al. Interactions between Candida albicans and the resident microbiota. Front. Microbiol 13, 930495 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Bouza E & Munoz P Epidemiology of candidemia in intensive care units. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 32, S87–S91 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Epelbaum O & Chasan R Candidemia in the intensive care unit. Clin. Chest Med 38, 493–509 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Siegman-Igra Y The significance of urine culture with mixed flora. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 3, 656–659 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Rudman D, Hontanosas A, Cohen Z & Mattson DE Clinical correlates of bacteremia in a veterans administration extended care facility. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc 36, 726–732 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Lee HS & Le J in Infectious Diseases, (eds Huang V, et al. ) 7–28. (American College of Clinical Pharmacology, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Yu Y et al. Urethral catheter biofilms reveal plasticity in bacterial composition and metabolism and withstand host immune defenses in hypoxic environment. Front. Med 8, 667462 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Allkja J, Goeres DM, Azevedo AS & Azevedo NF Interactions of microorganisms within a urinary catheter polymicrobial biofilm model. Biotechnol. Bioeng 120, 239–249 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Al-Balawi M & Morsy FM Enterococcus faecalis is a better competitor than other lactic acid bacteria in the initial colonization of colon of healthy newborn babies at first week of their life. Front. Microbiol 11, 2017 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention. HAI Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance Report, 2018–2021. CDC; https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/hai-report/index.html (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Sheerin NS Urinary tract infection. Medicine 39, 384–389 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Komala M & Kumar KS Urinary tract infection: causes, symptoms, diagnosis and its management. Indian J. Res. Pharm. Biotechnol 1, 226 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Sheerin NS & Glover EK Urinary tract infection. Medicine 47, 546–550 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Danchaivijitr S, Dhiraputra C, Cherdrungsi R, Jintanothaitavorn D & Srihapol N Catheter-associated urinary tract infection. J. Med. Assoc. Thai 88, 26–30 (2005). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Meddings J, Reichert H & McMahon LF Jr Challenges and proposed improvements for reviewing symptoms and catheter use to identify national healthcare safety network catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Am. J. Infect. Control. 42, S236–S241 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Tambyah PA & Maki DG Catheter-associated urinary tract infection is rarely symptomatic: a prospective study of 1497 catheterized patients. Arch. Intern. Med 160, 678–682 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Blodgett TJ, Gardner SE, Blodgett NP, Peterson LV & Pietraszak M A tool to assess the signs and symptoms of catheter-associated urinary tract infection development and reliability. Clin. Nurs. Res 24, 341–356 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Garimella V & Cellini C Postoperative pain control. Clin. Colon. Rectal Surg 26, 191–196 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Dinh A et al. Urinary tract infections in patients with neurogenic bladder. Med. Mal. Infect 49, 495–504 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Timm MR, Russell SK & Hultgren SJ Urinary tract infections: pathogenesis, host susceptibility and emerging therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 23, 72–86 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Storme O, Tiran Saucedo J, Garcia-Mora A, Dehesa-Davila M & Naber KG Risk factors and predisposing conditions for urinary tract infection. Ther. Adv. Urol 11, 1756287218814382 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Mwansa CML, Babiker A, Satola S, Logan LK & Nadimpalli ML Associations between neighbourhood-level median household income and outpatients’ risk of antibiotic non-susceptible uropathogens in a major urban centre, USA. JAC Antimicrob. Resist 6, dlae179 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Fromer DL et al. Risk factors for empiric treatment failure in US female outpatients with uncomplicated urinary tract infection: an observational study. J. Gen. Intern. Med 40, 862–870 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Bono MJ, Leslie SW & Reygaert WC Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections. StatPearls [Internet] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470195/ (updated 21 February 2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Sen A, Kaul A & Kaul R Estrogen receptors in human bladder cells regulate innate cytokine responses to differentially modulate uropathogenic E. coli colonization. Immunobiology 226, 152020 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Ackerson BK et al. Risk factors for recurrent urinary tract infections among women in a large integrated health care organization in the United States. J. Infect. Dis 230, e1101–e1111 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Anger J et al. Recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women: AUA/CUA/SUFU guideline. J. Urol 202, 282–289 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Meddings J et al. Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an integrative review. BMJ Qual. Saf 23, 277–289 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Raz R, Schiller D & Nicolle LE Chronic indwelling catheter replacement before antimicrobial therapy for symptomatic urinary tract infection. J. Urol 164, 1254–1258 (2000). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Babich T et al. Replacement of urinary catheter for urinary tract infections: a prospective observational study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc 66, 1779–1784 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Ausen K, Fossmark R, Spigset O & Pleym H Safety and efficacy of local tranexamic acid for the prevention of surgical bleeding in soft-tissue surgery: a review of the literature and recommendations for plastic surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg 149, 774–787 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Perrin K et al. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) in the NeuroICU: identification of risk factors and time-to-CAUTI using a case-control design. Neurocrit Care 34, 271–278 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Chen Y et al. Income-related inequalities in diagnosed diabetes prevalence among US adults, 2001–2018. PLoS ONE 18, e0283450 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Chen J, Khazanchi R, Bearman G & Marcelin JR Racial/ethnic inequities in healthcare-associated infections under the shadow of structural racism: narrative review and call to action. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep 23, 17 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Li X et al. Effects of hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus on coagulation and hemostasis. J. Clin. Med 10, 2419 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Bryk-Wiazania AH & Undas A Hypofibrinolysis in type 2 diabetes and its clinical implications from mechanisms to pharmacological modulation. Cardiovasc. Diabetol 20, 191 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Cronkleton E What Medication Can Treat a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)? Healthline https://www.healthline.com/health/medicine-for-urinary-tract-infection#oral-antibiotics (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Dunne MW et al. Impact of empirical antibiotic therapy on outcomes of outpatient urinary tract infection due to nonsusceptible Enterobacterales. Microbiol. Spectr 10, e02359–02321 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Aggarwal N & Leslie SW Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections. StatPearls [Internet] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557479/ (updated 20 January 2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Lee HS & Le J in Infectious Diseases (eds Huang V et al. ) 7–28 (PSAP, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Heimann D, Kohnhäuser D, Kohnhäuser AJ & Brönstrup M Antibacterials with novel chemical scaffolds in clinical development. Drugs 85, 293–323 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Sabih A & Leslie SW Complicated Urinary Tract Infections. StatPearls [Internet] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK436013/ (updated 7 December 2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Tingsgard S, Bastrup Israelsen S, Jorgensen HL, Ostergaard C & Benfield T Early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics for patients with uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia. JAMA Netw. Open 7, e2352314 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Turjeman A et al. Duration of antibiotic treatment for gram-negative bacteremia — systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 55, 101750 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Hollenbeck BL & Rice LB Intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms in enterococcus. Virulence 3, 421–433 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Kim P et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of LBP-EC01, a CRISPR-Cas3-enhanced bacteriophage cocktail, in uncomplicated urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli (ELIMINATE): the randomised, open-label, first part of a two-part phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect. Dis 24, 1319–1332 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Kanti SPY, Csoka I, Jojart-Laczkovich O & Adalbert L Recent advances in antimicrobial coatings and material modification strategies for preventing urinary catheter-associated complications. Biomedicines 10, 2580 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Al-Qahtani M, Safan A, Jassim G & Abadla S Efficacy of anti-microbial catheters in preventing catheter associated urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients: a review on recent updates. J. Infect. Public. Health 12, 760–766 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Chadha J, Thakur N, Chhibber S & Harjai K A comprehensive status update on modification of Foley catheter to combat catheter-associated urinary tract infections and microbial biofilms. Crit. Rev. Microbiol 50, 168–195 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Schug SA The role of COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of postoperative pain. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol 47, S82–S86 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Maki KC et al. Consumption of a cranberry juice beverage lowered the number of clinical urinary tract infection episodes in women with a recent history of urinary tract infection. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 103, 1434–1442 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Babar A et al. High dose versus low dose standardized cranberry proanthocyanidin extract for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection in healthy women: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Urol 21, 44 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Cooper TE et al. D‐mannose for preventing and treating urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev 8, CD013608 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Hayward G et al. d-Mannose for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection among women: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern. Med 184, 619–628 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.La Bella AA, Molesan A, Wollin DA, Paul S & Flores-Mireles AL Initial antimicrobial testing of a novel reusable intermittent urinary catheter system and catheter reprocessing device. Urology 193, 8–15 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Etefia E in Escherichia coli — Old and New Insights (ed. Erjavec MS) (IntechOpen, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Carere-Sigl A, Nowakowska J, Hevey R, Khanna N & Ernst B in Carbohydrate Chemistry: Chemical and Biological Approaches , Volume 45 (eds Rauter AP, Lindhorst TK, Queneau Y (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Spaulding CN & Hultgren SJ Adhesive pili in UTI pathogenesis and drug development. Pathogens 5, 30 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Chagneau CV et al. HlyF, an underestimated virulence factor of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin. Microbiol. Infect 29, 1449.e1441–1449.e1449 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Tanaka R et al. Cyclic-di-AMP confers an invasive phenotype on Escherichia coli through elongation of flagellin filaments. Gut Pathog. 16, 6 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Lopez-Banda DA et al. Identification of virulence factors genes in Escherichia coli isolates from women with urinary tract infection in Mexico. Biomed. Res. Int 2014, 959206 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Bunduki GK et al. Virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) isolated from urinary tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis 21, 753 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Zou Z et al. E. coli catheter-associated urinary tract infections are associated with distinctive virulence and biofilm gene determinants. JCI Insight 8, e161461 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Mohamed EH et al. Study of biofilm, virulence genes, and risk factors in urinary catheter-associated Escherichia coli infections. Jundishapur J. Microbiol 17, 1–9 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Lopatto EDB et al. Conformational ensembles in Klebsiella pneumoniae FimH impact uropathogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2409655121 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Clegg S & Murphy CN in Urinary Tract Infections: Molecular Pathogenesis and Clinical Management (eds. Mulvey MA et al. ) 435–457 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Govindarajan DK & Kandaswamy K Virulence factors of uropathogens and their role in host pathogen interactions. Cell Surf 8, 100075 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Schaffer JN & Pearson MM Proteus mirabilis and urinary tract infections. Microbiol. Spectr 10.1128/microbiolspec.UTI-0017-2013 (2015). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Wasfi R, Hamed SM, Amer MA & Fahmy LI Proteus mirabilis biofilm: development and therapeutic strategies. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol 10, 414 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Newman JW, Floyd RV & Fothergill JL The contribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence factors and host factors in the establishment of urinary tract infections. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 364, fnx124 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Romling U, Galperin MY & Gomelsky M Cyclic di-GMP: the first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev 77, 1–52 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Cole SJ, Records AR, Orr MW, Linden SB & Lee VT Catheter-associated urinary tract infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa is mediated by exopolysaccharide-independent biofilms. Infect. Immun 82, 2048–2058 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Jackson-Litteken CD et al. InvL, an invasin-like adhesin, is a type II secretion system substrate required for Acinetobacter baumannii uropathogenesis. mBio 13, e0025822 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Kundra S et al. c-di-AMP is essential for the virulence of Enterococcus faecalis. Infect. Immun 89, e0036521 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Colomer-Winter C et al. Manganese acquisition is essential for virulence of Enterococcus faecalis. PLoS Pathog 14, e1007102 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Lam LN, Brunson DN, Molina JJ, Flores-Mireles AL & Lemos JA The AdcACB/AdcAII system is essential for zinc homeostasis and an important contributor of Enterococcus faecalis virulence. Virulence 13, 592–608 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Xu K et al. Staphylococcus aureus ST1 promotes persistent urinary tract infection by highly expressing the urease. Front. Microbiol 14, 1101754 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Paudel S et al. Defining the roles of pyruvate oxidation, TCA cycle, and mannitol metabolism in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Microbiol. Spectr 11, e05365–e05322 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Ismail MG, El-Haliem A, Farouk N & Aboelmagd EK Assessment of virulence factors and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species isolated from catheter associated urinary tract infections. Al-Azhar Int. Med. J 1, 179–188 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Letica-Kriegel AS et al. Identifying the risk factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a large cross-sectional study of six hospitals. BMJ Open 9, e022137 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Shankar M, Narasimhappa S & Madhura NS Urinary tract infection in chronic kidney disease population: a clinical observational study. Cureus 13, e12486 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information

RESOURCES