Abstract
The Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), a leading cause of viral encephalitis, exists as similar but non-identical biological clones whose genomic variations/mutations may determine neurovirulence. Two biological clones purified from a brain-derived, clinical isolate were tested in vitro for neurovirulence using human neuronal cells (SK-N-MC) and mouse neuronal cells (NIE-115) and in vivo on a footpad-inoculation mouse model. One clone (JEV-M) demonstrated significantly reduced infectivity in both neuronal cells and the mouse model compared to another clone (JEV-V). Of the 2 E gene point mutations in JEV-M, only the T175C mutation, which translates as an E protein residue 59, amino acid tyrosine to histidine change (Y59H), was found to be the neurovirulence determinant as confirmed by testing with infectious clones with or without these mutations. These novel findings could further our understanding of JEV neuropathogenesis and may be useful for future vaccine development.
Keywords: biological clones, E protein, Japanese encephalitis virus, neurovirulence, neuroinvasion, Y59H
Introduction
Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is an enveloped, single-stranded positive-sense RNA arbovirus belonging to the family Flaviviridae and genus Orthoflavivirus. The ~11 kb genome comprises capsid, pre-membrane and envelope (E) genes that encode for three corresponding structural proteins and seven non-structural genes: NS1, NS2A and B, NS3, NS4A and B and NS5. The ORF is flanked by 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions [1,3].
JEV is one of the leading causes of mosquito-borne viral encephalitides with an annual global estimation of 68,000 Japanese encephalitis (JE) cases and 13,600 to 20,400 deaths in affected areas [4]. In endemic areas, JE largely involves children, but in non-endemic areas, all age groups are at risk of infection [1]. With a 1:25 to 1:1000 symptomatic to asymptomatic ratio [1,5], fatality rate ranges from 25 to 50%, and more than 50% of the survivors suffer permanent neurological sequelae [6].
Like other orthoflaviviruses, including tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBVE) and West Nile virus, JEV replicates in the absence of proof-reading and repair of the newly synthesized viral RNA. Hence, the virus exists as a mixture of closely similar genotypes, termed biological clones [7,8]. Viral biological clones may result in biological differences, including differences in cell tropism, virulence and host range, and resistance to antiviral agents and host immune responses [7,9]. In the laboratory, a highly virulent strain of TBVE was repeatedly cultured in mammalian porcine kidney cells, resulting in the production of three viral biological clones. These biological clones showed variations in plaque sizes and virulence when tested in a mouse model [10]. Relatively little is known about genomic diversities in JEV biological clones and how they may impact neurovirulence.
In this study, we purified biological clones derived from a clinical isolate to investigate viral genomic differences that could determine neurovirulence. Following our in vitro results that suggested that E gene mutations may impact neurovirulence, we also tested the biological clones and corresponding infectious clones (IC) on a footpad-inoculation JE mouse model that we had previously shown to be a good in vivo neurovirulence model [11]. Our in vitro and in vivo results suggest that E gene mutations in JEV may play a significant role in neuropathogenesis.
Methods
Cell lines
Human neuroepithelioma cells (SK-N-MC) (ATCC-HTB-10, USA) and mouse neuroblastoma cells (NIE-115) (ATCC-CRL-2263, USA) were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Hyclone, Fisher Scientific, USA) and gentamicin. Aedes albopictus cells (C6/36) (ATCC-CRL-1660, USA) were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI-160) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), supplemented with 10% FBS and gentamicin.
Biological clone isolation and purification
A JEV clinical isolate (CNS138/9), originating from the brain of a deceased patient in Sarawak, Malaysia [12], was purified using a limiting dilution method as previously described [13]. In brief, C6/36 cells seeded in 96-well plates (1.5×104 cells/well) were infected with 10-fold serial dilutions of CNS138/9 virus stock in quadruplicate sets. At 7 days post-infection (dpi), supernatant was collected from each well. Wells with the highest dilutions and viral antigen-positive cells underwent one more round of limiting dilution purification as before. As proof of infection, cells were stained by immunocytochemistry (ICC) for viral antigens because infected C6/36 cells do not show obvious cytopathic effects (CPE). Cells were methanol-fixed, followed by application of anti-JEV primary antibody, Jath-160 (obtained from Dr. Takasaki, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan), at 1:5000 dilution, 4 °C, and overnight incubation. This was followed by 30 min ENVISON HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Dako, Denmark) at room temperature (RT). Chromogen development was done using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine at a 1:50 dilution (Dako, Denmark). All purified biological clones obtained were propagated once in C6/36 cells and virus-titrated using the CCID50 assay.
Virus titration by CCID50 assay
The CCID50 assay was performed with slight modifications as previously described [14]. In brief, C6/36 cells seeded in 96-well plates (1.5×104 cells/well) were infected with 10-fold serial dilutions of JEV in quadruplicates. Infected cells were methanol-fixed and immunohistochemistry (IHC)-stained for viral antigens as a replacement for CPE observation, as described above. Viral titres were calculated using Karber’s method [15].
Biological clone infection of SK-N-MC and N1E-115 cells
SK-N-MC cells seeded into 24-well plates (8×104 cells/well) overnight were infected with the two purified biological clones, JEV-V (GenBank accession no. PV210294) and JEV-M (GenBank accession no. PV210295), at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. Unbounded viruses were removed by washing with PBS (pH 7.4) after an hour of pre-adsorption. Uninfected controls and infected cells were monitored up to 120 hours post-infection (hpi). At 120 hpi, cells were methanol-fixed and ICC-stained for viral antigens as before. Based on the results that showed progressive CPE, cell detachment and viral antigen positivity as evidence of neurovirulence, JEV-V was classified as neurovirulent, while JEV-M was found to be attenuated.
To further compare the relative neurovirulence between human and mouse neuronal cells, SK-N-MC and N1E-115 cells were seeded into 12-well plates (105 cells/well) for a day and then infected with JEV-V and JEV-M at MOIs of 10, 1 and 0.1. Unbound viruses were removed from cell cultures by PBS after 1 h pre-adsorption. To determine the one-step growth curves of JEV-V and JEV-M in neuronal cells, SK-N-MC and N1E-115 cells were seeded into 12-well plates (105 cells/well) and infected at an MOI of 10. Total cell lysates from three independent sets of experiments were collected at 24, 48, 72 and 96 hpi, freeze-thawed and viral titrated.
To determine whether the reduced infection of JEV-M was specific to neuronal cells, Vero cells, a non-human primate kidney cell line, were used to assess JEV-M infectivity in non-neuronal cells. Briefly, Vero cells seeded into 12-well plates (105 cells/well) for a day were infected with JEV-V and JEV-M at an MOI of 1. Total cell lysates from three independent sets of experiments were collected at 24, 48, 72 and 96 hpi, freeze-thawed and viral titrated.
Virus binding assay
The binding capacities of JEV-V and JEV-M virions to neuronal cells were assessed using a virus binding assay. SK-N-MC and NIE-115 cells were seeded into 12-well plates (1×105 cells/well) overnight. The cells were pre-chilled at 4 °C for 1 h prior to infection with JEV-V and JEV-M at an MOI of 10 for 2 h at 4 °C. Unbound viruses were removed by washing the cells three times with ice-cold PBS. Uninfected cells served as negative controls. Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plus Mini kit (QIAGEN, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Approximately 100 ng RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using the Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche, Switzerland), followed by absolute quantification of viral RNA via SYBR green real-time PCR using JEV-specific primers (Table S1, available in the online Supplementary Material).
Whole genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis
The whole genomes of JEV-V and JEV-M were sequenced. Viral RNA was extracted and reverse-transcribed using the High Pure Viral RNA Extraction Kit (Roche, Switzerland) and the Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche, Switzerland), respectively. For whole-genome sequencing, the cDNAs were PCR-amplified using HotStarTaq DNA Polymerase (QIAGEN, Germany) and JEV-specific primers (Table S1) to amplify overlapping viral genomic cDNA fragments. The PCR conditions followed the manufacturer’s protocol, adjusted for annealing temperatures (Ta) and extension times for optimization: 95 °C for 15 min, 35 cycles of denaturation, annealing and extension at 94 °C for 1 min, 50–60 °C (depending on primer pairs used) for 1 min, 72 °C for 3–4 min (depending on primer pairs used) and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The 3′ and 5′ terminal sequences were obtained using 3′ and 5′ RACE [16], respectively. PCR products were purified using the High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit (Roche, Switzerland) and were sent for Big Dye Terminator Sanger sequencing (Applied Biosystems, Invitrogen, USA). Nucleotide sequences with overlapping reads that covered the amplicons on both strands were assembled using DNA Baser v 4.16.0 (HeradeBioSoft S.R.L, Romania) to obtain the complete genome.
All coding sequences were translated to the corresponding amino acids and aligned using the AlignPlus 4 software (S and E Software, USA). The E protein 3D models were predicted using the web-based protein analysis software I-TASSER [17,19]. Qualities of the predicted models were assessed using a C-score within the range of 0.5 to 2. The structural similarities between the predicted models and the native structures were determined using TM-scores, where scores of more than 0.05 were used as indications of correct topology.
Generation of infectious clones
ICs were generated using standard molecular cloning methods and subcloning of the PCR-amplified JEV-V genome into the previously established MuarFLC plasmid [20]. In brief, the Not-1 JEV-V 5′ end fragment of around 6.5 kb was PCR-amplified using primer pairs Not-T7-JE-F and 13R (Table S1), and the PCR product was inserted into the MuarFLC plasmid at the Not-1-Spel (Fast Digest FD0593, FD1253, Thermo Scientific, USA) cutting site. The remaining fragment of about 4.5 kb was fused with hepatitis D virus (HDV) ribozyme and SWAI using fusion PCR [21] and primer pairs 24F and HDV-10964R, HDV-F and HDV-R-SWAI (Table S1). The PCR product was inserted at the SpeI-SwaI (Fast Digest FD1253, FD1244, Thermo Scientific, USA) cutting site. Transformation was done using TOP 10 Escherichia coli-competent cells (Invitrogen, USA). After confirming that in vitro-transcribed RNA from the final product JEV-VIC could produce IHC-confirmed viral antigens by C6/36 cell transfection, the JEV-VIC genome was sequenced to confirm 100% homology with wild type (WT) JEV-V.
Given that E gene mutations have been more commonly reported as neurovirulence determinants, our approach prioritized infectious clones reproducing the two E gene mutations (T175C and G979A) found in JEV-M but not in JEV-V. To produce the IC (JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A) that contained both mutations, the PCR product generated from primer pairs Not-T7-JE-F and 23 R using JEV-M cDNA as the template was inserted into the JEV-VIC plasmid at the Not-1-Xhol cutting site (Fast Digest FD0593, FD0698, Thermo Scientific, USA). The ICs that have a single nucleotide E gene mutation (either T175C or G979A; designated as JEV-VIC/T175C and JEV-VIC/G979A, respectively) were generated using PCR-based, site-directed mutagenesis with primer pairs containing the intended point mutations and the JEV-VIC plasmid DNA as a template [22]. The E gene T175C mutation was created using primer pairs Not-T7-JE-F and fragment 1 mt1-R, fragment 2 mt1-F and 23R, while the G979A mutation was inserted using primer pairs Not-T7-JE-F and fragment 1 mt2-R, fragment 2 mt2-F and 23R (Table S1). After PCR, the products were subcloned into the JEV-VIC plasmid at the Not1-Xhol cutting site (Fast Digest FD0593, FD0698, Thermo Scientific, USA) and confirmed by sequencing. All PCR amplifications were done using the high-fidelity Q5 DNA polymerase (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) following manufacturer’s protocol, but with adjusted Ta and extension times for optimal PCR amplification: 98 °C for 30 s, 35 cycles of denaturation, annealing and extension at 98 °C for 10 s, 57–72 °C (depending on primer pairs) for 30 s, 72 °C for 2–7 min (depending on primer pairs) and final extension at 72 °C for 2 min.
In order to recover infectious viral progenies, Swal linearized plasmid IC DNAs were in vitro transcribed using the MEGAscript T7 Transcription kit (Ambion, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with the 5′ cap analogue m7G(5′)ppp(5′)A (S1405S) (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, USA). The in vitro-transcribed RNAs were treated with TURBO DNase1 at 37 °C for 15 min to remove plasmid templates and subsequently purified. Infectious progenies were recovered by transfection of in vitro-transcribed viral RNA in C6/36 cells. Virus stocks were propagated once in C6/36 cells and titrated using the CCID50 assay as before. The E gene sequences of these virus stocks were reconfirmed, using primer pairs targeting partial membrane (M), full envelope (E) and partial non-structural 1 (NS1) gene sequence (Table S1) and all subsequent steps were as described above for whole-genome sequencing.
Phenotypic characterization of infectious clones’ viral progeny
In vitro neurovirulence of JEV-VIC, JEV-VIC/T175C, JEV-VIC/G979A and JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A viral progenies was tested using SK-N-MC and NIE-115 cells seeded into 12-well plates (105 cells/well) at MOIs of 10, 1 and 0.1, and at 120 hpi, collected supernatants were virus-titrated as before. Similarly, the one-step growth curves in both neuronal cells infected at an MOI of 10 were determined in supernatants collected at 24, 48, 72 and 96 hpi as before.
Infection of the Japanese encephalitis mouse model by biological and infectious clones
To compare the in vivo neurovirulence of JEV-V and JEV-M biological clones, groups of 2-week-old ICR mice (n=4 per group) were inoculated via the right hind footpad with 20 µl of 106, 105 and 104 CCID50/ml of either JEV-V or JEV-M, respectively. Additionally, four groups of mice (n=4 per group) were footpad-inoculated with 20 µl of infectious viral progenies at 104 CCID50/ml obtained from JEV-VIC, JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A, JEV-VIC/T175C and JEV-VIC/G979A, respectively. An uninfected control group (n=4) was footpad-inoculated with 20 µl PBS.
All animals were monitored twice daily up to 21 dpi. Animals that developed severe signs of infection or became moribund were euthanized via isoflurane inhalation. Animals that remained healthy were euthanized at the end of the observation period using the same method. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were plotted for each group of animals. Animal carcasses were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, routinely processed and paraffin-embedded for histopathological analysis. Paraffin blocks were sectioned at 4 µm thickness, and tissue sections were mounted onto 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (Sigma-Aldrich, USA)-coated slides for haematoxylin and eosin staining and IHC to detect viral antigens.
All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya (ethics number: 170819/PATHO/PS/WKT, 2017-200106/PATHO/R/WKT), and were conducted in the AAALAC International-accredited Animal Experimental Unit.
Immunohistochemistry for viral antigen detection in animal tissues
IHC was performed using a standard ENVISION immunoperoxidase technique [23,24]. Following a 20-min peroxidase blocking, 30-min heat-mediated antigen retrieval (Tris-EDTA/0.05% Tween 20, pH 9.0) and 20-min serum blocking (1:20 dilution) at RT, tissue sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-JEV E protein antibody (GTX125876, GeneTex, USA) at a 1:2,500 dilution. Sections were then incubated in ENVISION HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Dako, Denmark) at a 1:1 dilution for 30 min at RT. Chromogen development was carried out using DAB (Dako, Denmark) at 1:50 dilution, followed by Harris haematoxylin counterstaining. All washing steps between incubations were performed with TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (pH 8.0) three times.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed on the means of three independent experiments, expressed as mean±sd. Normally distributed data were analysed with T-tests or ANOVA. Non-parametric analyses were performed for non-normally distributed data. Data normality was determined by the Shapiro–Wilk analysis. Statistical significance was set as P≤0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 17.0.
Results
Reduced JEV-M infectivity in neuronal cells
At the MOI of 10, JEV-V demonstrated CPE and cell detachment in SK-N-MC and N1E115 cells starting at 48 hpi (Fig. 1a). In contrast, JEV-M showed reduced infectivity in SK-N-MC and N1E115 cells with minimal CPE at 120 hpi (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1. Comparative analysis of WT JEV-V and JEV-M. (a) Infection of SK-N-MC and NIE-115 cells with JEV-V and JEV-M. At an MOI of 10, SK-N-MC cells infected with JEV-V displayed CPE, including cell clumping, shrinkage and detachment (indicated by arrows). In contrast, CPE was minimal or absent in JEV-M-infected and uninfected cells. In NIE-115 cells, JEV-V infection at MOI 10 resulted primarily in cell rounding, while CPE was minimal or absent in both JEV-M-infected and uninfected cells (original magnification: 10× objective) (Note: NIE-115 cells generally do not reach 100% confluency, unlike SK-N-MC cells.) (b) Replication kinetics of JEV-V and JEV-M in SK-N-MC and NIE-115 cells. At an MOI of 10, one-step growth curves showed significantly higher (P≤0.05) viral titres in JEV-V-infected cells than in JEV-M-infected cells at all time points. JEV-V replication peaked at 48 hpi and decreased gradually thereafter, while JEV-M replication gradually increased over time. (c) Mean viral RNA copy number ±sd bound to SK-N-MC and NIE-115 cells following 2 h of incubation at 4 °C. No significant differences in binding efficiencies of JEV-V and JEV-M were observed (P>0.05). The Y-axis denotes the amount of virus bound, quantified as viral RNA copy number. (d) Survival graphs of mice following footpad inoculation with JEV-V, JEV-M and their respective infectious clones. All mice infected with 20 µl of 106, 105 and 104 CCID50/ml JEV-V succumbed to the infection at 6, 7 and 8 dpi, respectively. In contrast, mice infected with the same volume of JEV-M at 106 and 105 CCID50/ml showed survival rates of 50% and 75%, respectively, while 100% of mice survived infection with 104 CCID50/ml. * indicates statistical significance, P-values≤0.05.
At the MOI of 10, the one-step growth kinetics of JEV-M in SK-N-MC and NIE-115 cells showed modest and gradual increases from 24 to 96 hpi, with the viral titres ranging from mean log 0.5 to 3 CCID50 (Fig. 1b). However, JEV-V growth was more rapid, peaking at 48 hpi, and decreased gradually thereafter with viral titre range of mean log 3 to 5 CCID50 (Fig. 1b). At all corresponding time points, JEV-M titres were significantly lower (P≤0.05) than JEV-V titres (Fig. 1b).
Binding efficiency of JEV-V and JEV-M in neuronal cells
The binding efficiency of JEV-V and JEV-M virions to neuronal cells was evaluated after 2 h of incubation at 4 °C. In both SK-N-MC and NIE-115 cells, there were no statistically significant differences in the amount of cell-bound JEV-M virions compared to JEV-V (P>0.05). In SK-N-MC cells, the mean viral RNA copy number±sd was (2.87±0.32) × 10⁹ for JEV-V and (2.50±0.063) × 10⁹ for JEV-M. Similarly, in NIE-115 cells, the viral RNA copy number was (2.68±0.16) × 10⁹ for JEV-V and (2.43±0.081) × 10⁹ for JEV-M (Fig. 1c).
Attenuation of JEV-M neurovirulence in the mouse model
Death/moribund/severe infection rates of 50%, 25% and 0% were observed in mice footpad-inoculated with 106, 105 and 104 CCID50/ml JEV-M, respectively. Severely infected animals demonstrated signs such as ruffled fur, hunched back posture, paralysis and seizures. These signs in JEV-M-infected animals generally started from a mean 8.5±0.71 dpi in 2 of 4 animals and 8 dpi in 1 of 4 animals for viral doses of 106 and 105 CCID50/ml, respectively. At the viral dose of 104 CCID50/ml, all the surviving JEV-M-infected animals did not show any signs of infection and appeared healthy throughout the observation period. All JEV-V infected mice had the same signs of infection, which started earlier from mean dpi of 4.25±0.96, 5.5±0.58 and 6.5±0.58, for viral doses 106, 105 and 104 CCID50/ml, respectively. Moreover, these mice died or became moribund earlier at a mean dpi of 5.75±0.5, 6.75±0.5 and 7.75±0.5, respectively (Fig. 1d).
In all the animals infected with 104 CCID50/ml JEV-M, there was no inflammation, and viral antigens were not detected in the central nervous system (CNS) of surviving animals euthanized on 21 dpi (n=4). However, at this same dose, all JEV-V-infected animals (n=4) showed inflammation (Fig. 2d) and extensive viral antigens in the cerebral cortex, thalamus, hippocampus, hypothalamus, brainstem and the spinal cord (Fig. 2a–c) . All uninfected control animals appeared healthy throughout the experimental period, and CNS inflammation and viral antigens were absent.
Fig. 2. Viral antigen and inflammation in JEV-V- and JEV-M-infected mice. Viral antigen positivity and distribution in comparable and representative sections of the cerebral cortex (a), hippocampus (b) and brainstem (c) in JEV-V-infected mice, but not in JEV-M-infected mice (original magnification: 4× objective; inset: 40× objective). The higher magnification images in the insets, taken from the areas indicated by arrows, either showed neuronal cell body cytoplasmic localization of viral antigens or their absence. (d) Inflammation was detected in the brainstem of JEV-V-infected mice, but not in JEV-M-infected mice (original magnification: 10× objective). All animals were footpad-infected with the same dose of 20 µl 104 CCID50/ml.
Whole genome comparison of JEV-M and JEV-V
Whole genome sequencing showed only four nucleotide differences between JEV-M and JEV-V biological clones. In JEV-M, a thymine to cytosine (T175C) mutation was observed in the E gene at position 175, resulting in the tyrosine to histidine (Y59H) amino acid change on the E protein at position 59. A second E gene guanine to adenine (G979A) substitution at position 979 resulted in an alanine to threonine (A327T) change on the E protein at position 327 (Table 1). In addition, a cytosine to thymine change in the NS5 gene at position 628 resulted in the proline to serine amino acid change in the NS5 protein at position 210. A nucleotide, cytosine to thymine change in the 3′-UTR at position 10528 was also identified in JEV-M (Table 1).
Table 1. Nucleotide and amino acid differences between JEV-M and JEV-V biological clones identified through whole-genome sequencing.
| Biological clone | Neurovirulence | E gene | E gene | NS5 gene | 3′UTR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nucleotide position (175) |
Amino acid position (59) |
Nucleotide position (979) |
Amino acid position (327) |
Nucleotide position (628) |
Amino acid position (210) |
Nucleotide position (10528) |
||
| JEV-M | Attenuated | Cytosine | Histidine | Adenine | Threonine | Thymine | Serine | Thymine |
| JEV-V | Neurovirulent | Thymine | Tyrosine | Guanine | Alanine | Cytosine | Proline | Cytosine |
E, Envelope; NS5, non-structural protein 5; 3'UTR, 3' untranslated region.
The Y59H amino acid change in JEV-M, located on the E protein domain II, resulted in secondary structure changes from alpha helices to β-strands from residues 59 to 62. On the other hand, the domain III, A327T amino acid substitution did not appear to result in any change to the β-strand structure on residue 327 (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3. Predicted 3D models of E proteins of JEV-V and JEV-M. The Y59H amino acid substitution in JEV-M resulted in a secondary structure change involving residues 59 to 62 (circle; arrow) from α-helixes to β-strands. The C-scores and the estimated TM-scores for both models were 2 and 0.99±0.04, indicating models of high confidence and correct topology.
Infectious clone with T175C mutation showed a similar phenotype to JEV-M
Similar to WT JEV-M, there was minimal or no CPE in SK-N-MC and NIE-115 cells infected with JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A and JEV-VIC/T175C, clones that have the T175C mutation. Conversely, similar to WT JEV-V, progressive CPE and cell detachment were observed in JEV-VIC- and JEV-VIC/G979A-infected cells. Furthermore, at 120 hpi, only focal viral antigens were detected in JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A- and JEV-VIC/T175C-infected cells, whereas the majority of JEV-VIC- and JEV-VIC/G979A-infected cells were viral antigen-positive (Fig. 4a, b). Moreover, similar to JEV-M, significantly lower post-infection JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A and JEV-VIC/T175C viral titres were observed compared to JEV-V, JEV-VIC and JEV-VIC/G979A titres (P≤0.05) (Fig. 4c).
Fig. 4. (a) In SK-N-MC cells infected at an MOI of 1 with JEV-V, JEV-VIC and JEV-VIC/G979A, viral antigens were detected in the majority of remaining undetached cells. In contrast, in SK-N-MC infected with JEV-M, JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A and JEV-VIC/T175C, only focal viral antigens were detected. Viral antigens were absent from uninfected cells. (b) In NIE-115 cells, infected at an MOI of 1 with JEV-V, JEV-VIC and JEV-VIC/G979A, the majority of remaining undetached cells were viral antigen-positive. Viral antigens were absent from uninfected cells. Similar to SK-N-MC, N1E115 cells infected with JEV-M, JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A and JEV-VIC/T175C, only focal viral antigens were detected. Viral antigens were absent from uninfected cells. (c) At MOIs of 10, 1 and 0.1, JEV-VIC and JEV-VIC/G979A clearly showed significant (P≤0.05) increased growth compared to JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A and JEV-VIC/T175C at 120 hpi. (d) At the MOI of 10, JEV-VIC, JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A, JEV-VIC/T175C and JEV-VIC/G979A growth kinetics (one-step growth curves) in SK-N-MC and NIE-115 cells showed viral titres in JEV-VIC- and JEV-VIC/G979A-infected cells to be significantly higher (P≤0.05) than JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A and JEV-VIC/T175C at all time points. JEV-VIC and JEV-VIC/G979A replication peaked at 48 hpi and 72 hpi, respectively, in SK-N-MC and NIE-115 and decreased gradually thereafter, while JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A and JEV-VIC/T175C replication gradually increased over time.
JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A and JEV-VIC/T175C displayed similar growth kinetics as WT JEV-M in both SK-N-MC and NIE-115 cells. Gradual increases in viral titres from 24 to 96 hpi, with titre values ranging from mean log 0.5 to 2.5 CCID50, were observed, but overall, JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A and JEV-VIC/T175C titres were significantly lower than JEV-VIC and JEV-VIC/G979A (P≤0.05). As expected, JEV-VIC and JEV-VIC/G979A showed similar growth kinetics to WT JEV-V (Fig. 4d).
Overall, in terms of live viral infection, JEV-VT175C/G979A and JEV-VIC/T175C showed closely similar in vitro phenotype to WT JEV-M, while JEV-VIC and JEV-VIC/G979A showed close similarities to WT JEV-V.
Infectious clone with T175C mutation showed attenuated neurovirulence in the mouse model
Similar to the animals infected with 104 CCID50/ml JEV-M, the animal groups infected with JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A (n=4), JEV-VIC/T175C (n=4), all survived with no signs of infection and were euthanized on 21 dpi. No histopathological lesions and viral antigens were detected in the CNS tissues (Fig. 5a).
Fig. 5. (a) Viral antigen and inflammation in JEV-VIC and JEV-VIC mutants infected mice. Viral antigen positivity and distribution in comparable and representative sections of the cerebral cortex, hippocampus and brainstem in JEV-VIC and JEV-VIC/G979A, but not in JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A- and JEV-VIC/T175C-infected mice (original magnification: 4× objective; inset: 40× objective). The higher magnification images in the insets, taken from the areas indicated by arrows, either showed neuronal cell body cytoplasmic localization of viral antigens or their absence. Inflammation was detected in the brainstem of JEV-VIC and JEV-VIC/G979A, but not in JEV-M-, JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A- and JEV-VIC/T175C-infected mice (original magnification: 10× objective). JEV-VIC- and JEV-VIC/G979A-infected mouse tissues were obtained at ~7 dpi, while JEV-M-, JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A- and JEV-VIC/T175C-infected animal tissues were collected at 21 dpi. All animals were footpad-infected with the same dose of 20 µl 104 CCID50/ml. (b) Survival graphs of mice footpad-infected with JEV-VIC-, JEV-VIC/G979A-, JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A- and JEV-VIC/T175C.
Similar to the animals infected with JEV-V, all mice infected with JEV-VIC (n=4) and JEV-VIC/G979A (n=4) developed severe signs of infection or became moribund at mean 7±0.82 dpi and mean 7.5±0.58 dpi, with signs commencing at mean 6.25±0.5 dpi and 6±0.82 dpi, respectively (Fig. 5b). Neuroinflammation (Fig. 5a) and viral antigen-positive neurons were extensively detected in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, hypothalamus, brainstem and spinal cord as in WT JEV-V (Fig. 5). On the other hand, all uninfected control animals and JEV-VIC/T175C/G979A (n=4), JEV-VIC/T175C (n=4), appeared healthy throughout the experimental period, and CNS inflammation and viral antigens were absent.
Discussion
Like all RNA viruses, orthoflaviviruses can exist as biological clones comprising a complex mixture of virions with closely related but non-identical genomes that undergo continuous mutations due to competitive selection and cooperation between clones [7,8]. The genomic diversity in biological clones is well known to confer different phenotypic characteristics that include alterations in cell tropism, virulence and host range, resistance to antiviral agents and host immune responses [7,9].
In this study, we have purified 2 JEV biological clones from a clinical isolate from the brain of a fatal JE case. In one variant (JEV-M), attenuation of neurovirulence was confirmed by in vitro neurovirulence testing using two neuronal cell lines (SK-N-MC and NIE-115), consistently showing less CPE and reduced growth kinetics. JEV-M attenuation was confirmed in a footpad-inoculation JE mouse model. At viral doses higher than 104 CCID50/ml, the onset of signs of infection and death (25–50%) was dose dependent and also appeared later than the neurovirulent JEV-V. At a dose of 104 CCID50/ml, all JEV-M-infected animals survived, while all JEV-V-infected animals succumbed to the infection with evidence of extensive CNS infection.
Two point mutations in the E gene and one mutation each in the NS5 gene and 3′-UTR were identified in JEV-M that were not found in the neurovirulent JEV-V. The Orthoflavivirus E gene has been widely associated as an important neurovirulent determinant [25,27]. Hence, in this study, we focused on two E gene mutations. The first, T175C, caused a tyrosine to histidine amino acid (Y59H) change in the E protein domain II, resulting in a predicted secondary structure change from α-helices to β-strands between residues 59 to 62. Our in vitro and in vivo IC data confirmed that this point mutation attenuated the neurovirulence of JEV-M, strongly suggesting that the nucleotide thymine at position 175/amino acid tyrosine at position 59 is an important neurovirulence determinant. As expected, the other E gene mutation, G979A, which resulted in an A327T amino acid substitution in domain III, without any predicted secondary structure change, did not seem to impact neurovirulence on its own.
For the replication cycle to start, viral attachment/binding via the E protein to the host cell surface, and subsequent viral internalization by endocytosis, has to occur. Once internalized, the E protein fuses with the endosomal membrane, allowing release of the viral genome to initiate the replication process in the cytoplasm [28,33]. We postulate that the Y59H substitution in JEV-M may have altered one or more steps involved in attachment, entry and/or release of viral genome into the cytoplasm. However, our virus-binding assay demonstrated that JEV-M retains comparable binding efficiency to neuronal cells as JEV-V, suggesting that the mutation does not impair viral attachment. Therefore, it is more likely that the attenuation observed in JEV-M is due to a disruption in post-attachment events, such as viral entry and endosomal membrane fusion. This hypothesis warrants further investigation.
The current view holds that the orthoflaviviral E protein, which comprises three main ectodomains (domains I, II and III), functions cohesively in driving this two-step viral entry process, with domain II functioning exclusively to facilitate the endosomal fusion step [31,32, 34,38]. Tyrosine in position 59 (Y59) in the E gene is highly conserved among representative JEV strains, including Nakayama, FU, SA14 and the vaccine strain SA14-14-2. This residue is also conserved in other orthoflaviviruses such as the Zika virus and the West Nile virus (Fig. S1). Although a leucine is present at the corresponding position in certain dengue serotypes, this variation appears to reflect natural polymorphism. To date, known mutation sites in the dengue E gene associated with altered viral phenotypes do not include this position [39]. While our analysis was not exhaustive, the inclusion of representative strains across the orthoflavivirus genus supports the view that Y59 is a highly conserved residue that likely plays a critical structural or functional role. Its substitution in JEV-M appears to be a rare event of potential significance. Nevertheless, the precise functional consequence of the Y59H substitution remains to be elucidated.
In previous studies, using cell lines and mouse models, E gene mutations/amino acid substitutions were found to attenuate viral neurovirulence and/or neuroinvasion properties in intracerebrally and intraperitoneally inoculated mice [25,27]. The amino acid changes include glutamic acid to lysine at positions 49, 138 and 306, aspartic acid to glycine at positions 389 and 390, glycine to glutamic acid at position 306, arginine to glutamic acid at position 85, arginine to serine at position 331 and arginine to methionine at position 387. The arginine to glutamic acid (position 85) is located in domain II, while the others are located on domains I and III of the E protein.
As far as we are aware, the domain II, tyrosine to histidine amino acid (Y59H) change reported herein is novel, and its relationship with neurovirulence has not been demonstrated before. Its identification could contribute to our understanding and future development of live-attenuated JEV vaccines. However, it should be noted that this amino acid substitution resulted in partial attenuation in a mouse model, which was less obvious with higher viral doses.
The impact of the Y59H mutation in the E gene on JEV transmission in mosquitoes remains uncertain, as to our knowledge, no studies have directly linked this specific substitution to enhanced replication or transmission in mosquito vectors. However, studies on JEV genotype I (GI) vs. genotype III (GIII) have identified non-structural protein mutations, specifically NS2B-L99V, NS3-S78A and NS3-D177E, that significantly enhance GI virus replication in amplifying hosts such as pigs and poultry, leading to higher viremia and potentially more efficient transmission in the pig/avian-mosquito cycle [40]. In another orthoflavivirus, dengue virus, an E gene mutation (K122E) has been shown to enhance mosquitoes’ midgut infection, thereby potentially increasing transmission efficiency [41]. These findings suggest a potential role for Y59H in modulating JEV transmission, which warrants further investigation.
Although derived from a rare brain isolate, it should be noted that the CNS138/9 viral stock and the isolated biological clones had been cell-culture passaged four times under laboratory conditions, which may, by itself, introduce mutations into the viral genome. Comparing our sequences with an earlier isolate, CNS138-11, which had been previously deposited in GenBank (GenBank accession no.: AY184213) [42], we found the E gene revealed three nucleotide differences at positions 175, 731 and 979, corresponding to amino acid positions 59, 244 and 327, respectively, between CNS138-11, JEV-V and JEV-M. These sequence differences could reflect mutations introduced during cell culture passaging, particularly given the quasispecies nature of RNA viruses, such as JEV. However, it is equally plausible that these differences represent pre-existing variants within the original clinical isolate. Unfortunately, the original unpassaged brain tissue from which CNS138/9 was derived is no longer available for direct sequencing to investigate this further.
With respect to the two mutations found on NS5 and 3′-UTR, previous literature has reported that the NS5 gene encodes the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, which facilitates the viral replication process, while the 3′-UTR is important in the replication and translation process [43,44]. Our ICs that comprise the JEV-V backbone, JEV-M-derived E gene mutation(s), but without the NS5 and 3′-UTR mutations, showed similar replication with JEV-M, suggesting that the E protein Y59H mutation is probably the more significant neurovirulent determinant.
Supplementary material
Abbreviations
- CNS
central nervous system
- CPE
cytopathic effects
- dpi
days post-infection
- E
envelope gene
- FBS
fetal bovine serum
- HDV
hepatitis D virus
- hpi
hours post-infection
- IC
infectious clones
- ICC
immunocytochemistry
- IHC
immunohistochemistry
- JE
Japanese encephalitis
- JEV
Japanese encephalitis virus
- MOI
multiplicity of infection
- RT
room temperature
- TBVE
tick-borne encephalitis virus
- WT
wild type
Footnotes
Funding: This work was supported by the HIR grant, Universiti Malaya (project number: UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/MED/06) and Postgraduate Research Fund, Universiti Malaya (project number: PG285-2016A).
Author contributions: S.P.Y.: Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, data curation, project administration and writing – original draft. K.C.O.: Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, data curation and writing – review and editing. S.H.T.: Conceptualization and writing – review and editing. T.I.: Resources and methodology. D.P.: Resources and methodology. Y.T.H.: Conceptualization, writing – review and editing. K.T.W.: Conceptualization, project administration, data curation, writing – original draft and review and editing.
Ethical statement: All the animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya (ethics number: 170819/PATHO/PS/WKT, 2017-200106/PATHO/R/WKT), and performed according to its guidelines.
Contributor Information
Shu Pin Yu, Email: shupin.yu@yahoo.com.
Kien Chai Ong, Email: kcong@um.edu.my.
Soon Hao Tan, Email: tansoonhao@um.edu.my.
Tomohiro Ishikawa, Email: toishika@dokkyomed.ac.jp.
David Perera, Email: dperera@unimas.my.
Yuan Teng Hooi, Email: yuanteng.hooi@monash.edu.
Kum Thong Wong, Email: wongkt@ummc.edu.my.
References
- 1.Misra UK, Kalita J. Overview: Japanese encephalitis. Prog Neurobiol. 2010;91:108–120. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schweitzer BK, Chapman NM, Iwen PC. Overview of the Flaviviridae with an Emphasis on the Japanese encephalitis group viruses. Lab Med. 2009;40:493–499. doi: 10.1309/LM5YWS85NJPCWESW. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Unni SK, Růžek D, Chhatbar C, Mishra R, Johri MK, et al. Japanese encephalitis virus: from genome to infectome. Microbes Infect. 2011;13:312–321. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2011.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.World Health Organization Japanese encephalitis. 2019. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/japanese-encephalitis
- 5.Solomon T. Recent advances in Japanese encephalitis. J Neurovirol. 2003;9:274–283. doi: 10.1080/13550280390194037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Libraty DH, Nisalak A, Endy TP, Suntayakorn S, Vaughn DW, et al. Clinical and immunological risk factors for severe disease in Japanese encephalitis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002;96:173–178. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(02)90294-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Domingo E. Quasispecies theory in virology. J Virol. 2002;76:463–465. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.1.463-465.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lauring AS, Andino R. Quasispecies theory and the behavior of RNA viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001005. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sanz-Ramos M, Díaz-San Segundo F, Escarmís C, Domingo E, Sevilla N. Hidden virulence determinants in a viral quasispecies in vivo. J Virol. 2008;82:10465–10476. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00825-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Helmová R, Hönig V, Tykalová H, Palus M, Bell-Sakyi L, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus adaptation in different host environments and existence of quasispecies. Viruses. 2020;12:902. doi: 10.3390/v12080902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fu TL, Ong KC, Tan SH, Wong KT. Japanese Encephalitis virus infects the thalamus early followed by sensory-associated cortex and other parts of the central and peripheral nervous systems. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2019;78:1160–1170. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlz103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Henry Sum MS. The involvement of microtubules and actin during the infection of Japanese encephalitis virus in neuroblastoma cell line, IMR32. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:695283. doi: 10.1155/2015/695283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Beaucourt S, Bordería AV, Coffey LL, Gnädig NF, Sanz-Ramos M, et al. Isolation of fidelity variants of RNA viruses and characterization of virus mutation frequency. J Vis Exp. 2011;2011:52. doi: 10.3791/2953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schoepp RJ, Beaty BJ. Titration of dengue viruses by immunofluorescence in microtiter plates. J Clin Microbiol. 1984;20:1017–1019. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.5.1017-1019.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kärber G. Beitrag zur kollektiven behandlung pharmakologischer reihenversuche. Archiv f experiment Pathol u Pharmakol. 1931;162:480–483. doi: 10.1007/BF01863914. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sambrook J, Russell DW. Rapid amplification of 3′ cDNA Ends (3′-RACE) Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2006;2006:db. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc. 2010;5:725–738. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang J, Yan R, Roy A, Xu D, Poisson J, et al. The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat Methods. 2015;12:7–8. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ishikawa T, Abe M, Masuda M. Construction of an infectious molecular clone of Japanese encephalitis virus genotype V and its derivative subgenomic replicon capable of expressing a foreign gene. Virus Res. 2015;195:153–161. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cha-Aim K, Hoshida H, Fukunaga T, Akada R. Fusion PCR via novel overlap sequences. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;852:97–110. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-564-0_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shimada A. In Vitro Mutagenesis Protocols. Humana Press; 1996. PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis; pp. 157–166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sabattini E, Bisgaard K, Ascani S, Poggi S, Piccioli M, et al. The EnVision++ system: a new immunohistochemical method for diagnostics and research. Critical comparison with the APAAP, ChemMate, CSA, LABC, and SABC techniques. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51:506–511. doi: 10.1136/jcp.51.7.506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vyberg M, Nielsen S. Dextran polymer conjugate two-step visualization system for immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem. 1998;6:3–10. doi: 10.1097/00022744-199803000-00002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lee E, Hall RA, Lobigs M. Common E protein determinants for attenuation of glycosaminoglycan-binding variants of Japanese encephalitis and West Nile viruses. J Virol. 2004;78:8271–8280. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.15.8271-8280.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ni H, Barrett ADT. Attenuation of Japanese encephalitis virus by selection of its mouse brain membrane receptor preparation escape variants. Virology. 1998;241:30–36. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wu S-C, Lian W-C, Hsu L-C, Liau M-Y. Japanese encephalitis virus antigenic variants with characteristic differences in neutralization resistance and mouse virulence. Virus Res. 1997;51:173–181. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1702(97)00098-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hase T. Virus-neuron interactions in the mouse brain infected with Japanese encephalitis virus. Virchows Archiv B Cell Pathol. 1993;64:161–170. doi: 10.1007/BF02915109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hase T, Summers PL, Ray P. Entry and replication of Japanese encephalitis virus in cultured neurogenic cells. J Virol Methods. 1990;30:205–214. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(90)90021-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kaufmann B, Rossmann MG. Molecular mechanisms involved in the early steps of flavivirus cell entry. Microbes Infect. 2011;13:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Luca VC, AbiMansour J, Nelson CA, Fremont DH. Crystal structure of the Japanese encephalitis virus envelope protein. J Virol. 2012;86:2337–2346. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06072-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Stiasny K, Bressanelli S, Lepault J, Rey FA, Heinz FX. Characterization of a membrane-associated trimeric low-pH-induced form of the class II viral fusion protein E from tick-borne encephalitis virus and its crystallization. J Virol. 2004;78:3178–3183. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.6.3178-3183.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Stiasny K, Heinz FX. Flavivirus membrane fusion. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:2755–2766. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.82210-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bressanelli S, Stiasny K, Allison SL, Stura EA, Duquerroy S, et al. Structure of a flavivirus envelope glycoprotein in its low-pH-induced membrane fusion conformation. EMBO J. 2004;23:728–738. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Modis Y, Ogata S, Clements D, Harrison SC. Structure of the dengue virus envelope protein after membrane fusion. Nature. 2004;427:313–319. doi: 10.1038/nature02165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nayak V, Dessau M, Kucera K, Anthony K, Ledizet M, et al. Crystal structure of dengue virus type 1 envelope protein in the postfusion conformation and its implications for membrane fusion. J Virol. 2009;83:4338–4344. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02574-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rey FA, Heinz FX, Mandl C, Kunz C, Harrison SC. The envelope glycoprotein from tick-borne encephalitis virus at 2 A resolution. Nature. 1995;375:291–298. doi: 10.1038/375291a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nybakken GE, Nelson CA, Chen BR, Diamond MS, Fremont DH. Crystal structure of the West Nile virus envelope glycoprotein. J Virol. 2006;80:11467–11474. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01125-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mushtaq S, Khan MIU, Khan MT, Lodhi MS, Wei DQ. Novel mutations in structural proteins of dengue virus genomes. J Infect Public Health. 2023;16:1971–1981. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fan Y-C, Liang J-J, Chen J-M, Lin J-W, Chen Y-Y, et al. NS2B/NS3 mutations enhance the infectivity of genotype I Japanese encephalitis virus in amplifying hosts. PLoS Pathog. 2019;15:e1007992. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Erb SM, Butrapet S, Roehrig JT, Huang C-H, Blair CD. Genetic adaptation by dengue virus serotype 2 to enhance infection of Aedes aegypti mosquito midguts. Viruses. 2022;14:1569. doi: 10.3390/v14071569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Solomon T, Ni H, Beasley DWC, Ekkelenkamp M, Cardosa MJ, et al. Origin and evolution of Japanese encephalitis virus in southeast Asia. J Virol. 2003;77:3091–3098. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.5.3091-3098.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ng WC, Soto-Acosta R, Bradrick SS, Garcia-Blanco MA, Ooi EE. The 5’ and 3’ untranslated regions of the flaviviral genome. Viruses. 2017;9:137. doi: 10.3390/v9060137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Selisko B, Wang C, Harris E, Canard B. Regulation of flavivirus RNA synthesis and replication. Curr Opin Virol. 2014;9:74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2014.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





