Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2000 Nov;108(11):1007–1014. doi: 10.1289/ehp.001081007

Ecological risk assessment of endocrine disruptors.

T H Hutchinson 1, R Brown 1, K E Brugger 1, P M Campbell 1, M Holt 1, R Länge 1, P McCahon 1, L J Tattersfield 1, R van Egmond 1
PMCID: PMC1240154  PMID: 11102288

Abstract

The European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals proposes a tiered approach for the ecological risk assessment of endocrine disruptors, integrating exposure and hazard (effects) characterization. Exposure assessment for endocrine disruptors should direct specific tests for wildlife species, placing hazard data into a risk assessment context. Supplementing the suite of mammalian screens now under Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) validation, high priority should be given to developing a fish screening assay for detecting endocrine activity in oviparous species. Taking into account both exposure characterization and alerts from endocrine screening, higher tier tests are also a priority for defining adverse effects. We propose that in vivo mammalian and fish assays provide a comprehensive screening battery for diverse hormonal functions (including androgen, estrogen, and thyroid hormone), whereas Amphibia should be considered at higher tiers if there are exposure concerns. Higher tier endocrine-disruptor testing should include fish development and fish reproduction tests, whereas a full life-cycle test could be subsequently used to refine aquatic risk assessments when necessary. For avian risk assessment, the new OECD Japanese quail reproduction test guideline provides a valuable basis for developing a test to detecting endocrine-mediated reproductive effects; this species could be used, where necessary, for an avian life-cycle test. For aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates, data from existing developmental and reproductive tests remain of high value for ecological risk assessment. High priority should be given to research into comparative endocrine physiology of invertebrates to support data extrapolation to this diverse fauna.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (171.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashby J., Houthoff E., Kennedy S. J., Stevens J., Bars R., Jekat F. W., Campbell P., Van Miller J., Carpanini F. M., Randall G. L. The challenge posed by endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Feb;105(2):164–169. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benton M. J., Nimrod A. C., Benson W. H. Evaluation of growth and energy storage as biological markers of DDT exposure in sailfin mollies. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1994 Oct;29(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/0147-6513(94)90025-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown D. D., Wang Z., Kanamori A., Eliceiri B., Furlow J. D., Schwartzman R. Amphibian metamorphosis: a complex program of gene expression changes controlled by the thyroid hormone. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1995;50:309–315. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-571150-0.50018-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang E. S. Comparative endocrinology of molting and reproduction: insects and crustaceans. Annu Rev Entomol. 1993;38:161–180. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.38.010193.001113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DeVito M., Biegel L., Brouwer A., Brown S., Brucker-Davis F., Cheek A. O., Christensen R., Colborn T., Cooke P., Crissman J. Screening methods for thyroid hormone disruptors. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 May;107(5):407–415. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dukes M., Chester R., Yarwood L., Wakeling A. E. Effects of a non-steroidal pure antioestrogen, ZM 189,154, on oestrogen target organs of the rat including bones. J Endocrinol. 1994 May;141(2):335–341. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1410335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fry D. M. Reproductive effects in birds exposed to pesticides and industrial chemicals. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Oct;103 (Suppl 7):165–171. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s7165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang L. T., Yang W., Wu C. L. Vitamin D deficiency rickets due to inappropriate feeding: report of one case. Acta Paediatr Taiwan. 2000 May-Jun;41(3):151–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kanamori A., Brown D. D. The analysis of complex developmental programmes: amphibian metamorphosis. Genes Cells. 1996 May;1(5):429–435. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1996.d01-251.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lundholm C. D. DDE-induced eggshell thinning in birds: effects of p,p'-DDE on the calcium and prostaglandin metabolism of the eggshell gland. Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol. 1997 Oct;118(2):113–128. doi: 10.1016/s0742-8413(97)00105-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Purchase I. F. Ethical review of regulatory toxicology guidelines involving experiments on animals: the example of endocrine disrupters. Toxicol Sci. 1999 Dec;52(2):141–147. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/52.2.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stehle R. L. Local Anaesthetics-A Step Forward. Can Med Assoc J. 1925 Dec;15(12):1253–1254. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES