Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2000 Dec;108(12):1139–1145. doi: 10.1289/ehp.001081139

Ozone and limonene in indoor air: a source of submicron particle exposure.

T Wainman 1, J Zhang 1, C J Weschler 1, P J Lioy 1
PMCID: PMC1240194  PMID: 11133393

Abstract

Little information currently exists regarding the occurrence of secondary organic aerosol formation in indoor air. Smog chamber studies have demonstrated that high aerosol yields result from the reaction of ozone with terpenes, both of which commonly occur in indoor air. However, smog chambers are typically static systems, whereas indoor environments are dynamic. We conducted a series of experiments to investigate the potential for secondary aerosol in indoor air as a result of the reaction of ozone with d-limonene, a compound commonly used in air fresheners. A dynamic chamber design was used in which a smaller chamber was nested inside a larger one, with air exchange occurring between the two. The inner chamber was used to represent a model indoor environment and was operated at an air exchange rate below 1 exchange/hr, while the outer chamber was operated at a high air exchange rate of approximately 45 exchanges/hr. Limonene was introduced into the inner chamber either by the evaporation of reagent-grade d-limonene or by inserting a lemon-scented, solid air freshener. A series of ozone injections were made into the inner chamber during the course of each experiment, and an optical particle counter was used to measure the particle concentration. Measurable particle formation and growth occurred almost exclusively in the 0.1-0.2 microm and 0.2-0.3 microm size fractions in all of the experiments. Particle formation in the 0.1-0.2 microm size range occurred as soon as ozone was introduced, but the formation of particles in the 0.2-0.3 microm size range did not occur until at least the second ozone injection occurred. The results of this study show a clear potential for significant particle concentrations to be produced in indoor environments as a result of secondary particle formation via the ozone-limonene reaction. Because people spend the majority of their time indoors, secondary particles formed in indoor environments may make a significant contribution to overall particle exposure. This study provides data for assessing the impact of outdoor ozone on indoor particles. This is important to determine the efficacy of the mass-based particulate matter standards in protecting public health because the indoor secondary particles can vary coincidently with the variations of outdoor fine particles in summer.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (117.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Borja-Aburto V. H., Castillejos M., Gold D. R., Bierzwinski S., Loomis D. Mortality and ambient fine particles in southwest Mexico City, 1993-1995. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Dec;106(12):849–855. doi: 10.1289/ehp.106-1533229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burnett R. T., Smith-Doiron M., Stieb D., Cakmak S., Brook J. R. Effects of particulate and gaseous air pollution on cardiorespiratory hospitalizations. Arch Environ Health. 1999 Mar-Apr;54(2):130–139. doi: 10.1080/00039899909602248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fairley D. Daily mortality and air pollution in Santa Clara County, California: 1989-1996. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Aug;107(8):637–641. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gold D. R., Damokosh A. I., Pope C. A., 3rd, Dockery D. W., McDonnell W. F., Serrano P., Retama A., Castillejos M. Particulate and ozone pollutant effects on the respiratory function of children in southwest Mexico City. Epidemiology. 1999 Jan;10(1):8–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ilabaca M., Olaeta I., Campos E., Villaire J., Tellez-Rojo M. M., Romieu I. Association between levels of fine particulate and emergency visits for pneumonia and other respiratory illnesses among children in Santiago, Chile. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 1999 Sep;49(9 Spec No):154–163. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1999.10463879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kaiser J. Air pollution. Evidence mounts that tiny particles can kill. Science. 2000 Jul 7;289(5476):22–23. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5476.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Liao D., Creason J., Shy C., Williams R., Watts R., Zweidinger R. Daily variation of particulate air pollution and poor cardiac autonomic control in the elderly. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jul;107(7):521–525. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McConnell R., Berhane K., Gilliland F., London S. J., Vora H., Avol E., Gauderman W. J., Margolis H. G., Lurmann F., Thomas D. C. Air pollution and bronchitic symptoms in Southern California children with asthma. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Sep;107(9):757–760. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Naeher L. P., Holford T. R., Beckett W. S., Belanger K., Triche E. W., Bracken M. B., Leaderer B. P. Healthy women's PEF variations with ambient summer concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO42-, H+, and O3. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Jul;160(1):117–125. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.1.9808153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Neas L. M., Dockery D. W., Koutrakis P., Speizer F. E. Fine particles and peak flow in children: acidity versus mass. Epidemiology. 1999 Sep;10(5):550–553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Norris G., YoungPong S. N., Koenig J. Q., Larson T. V., Sheppard L., Stout J. W. An association between fine particles and asthma emergency department visits for children in Seattle. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jun;107(6):489–493. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sheppard L., Levy D., Norris G., Larson T. V., Koenig J. Q. Effects of ambient air pollution on nonelderly asthma hospital admissions in Seattle, Washington, 1987-1994. Epidemiology. 1999 Jan;10(1):23–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wallace L. Indoor particles: a review. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 1996 Feb;46(2):98–126. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1996.10467451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Weschler C. J., Shields H. C., Naik D. V. Indoor ozone exposures. JAPCA. 1989 Dec;39(12):1562–1568. doi: 10.1080/08940630.1989.10466650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Weschler C. J., Shields H. C., Rainer D. Concentrations of volatile organic compounds at a building with health and comfort complaints. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1990 May;51(5):261–268. doi: 10.1080/15298669091369628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weschler C. J., Shields H. C. The influence of ventilation on reactions among indoor pollutants: modeling and experimental observations. Indoor Air. 2000 Jun;10(2):92–100. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010002092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang J., Wilson W. E., Lioy P. J. Sources of organic acids in indoor air: a field study. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1994 Jan-Mar;4(1):25–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES