Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2000 Dec;108(12):1165–1169. doi: 10.1289/ehp.108-1240198

Environmental genotoxicity evaluation using cytogenetic end points in wild rodents.

A M de Souza Bueno 1, C A de Bragança Pereira 1, M N Rabello-Gay 1
PMCID: PMC1240198  PMID: 11133397

Abstract

We analyzed cytogenetic end points in three populations of two species of wild rodents--Akodon montensis and Oryzomys nigripes--living in an industrial, an agricultural, and a preservation area at the Itajaí Valley, state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Our purpose was to evaluate the performance of the following end points in the establishment of a genotoxic profile of each area: the polychromatic/normochromatic cell ratio; the mitotic index; the frequency of micronucleated cells both in the bone marrow and peripheral blood; and the frequency of cells with chromosome aberrations in the bone marrow. Preparations were obtained using conventional cytogenetic techniques. The results showed a) the role of the end points used as biomarkers in the early detection of genotoxic agents and in the identification of species and populations at higher risk; b) the difference in sensitivity of the species selected as bioindicators in relation to the cytogenetic end points analyzed; c) the need to use at least two sympatric species to detect the presence of genotoxins in each locality; and d) the need to use several end points when trying to establish a genotoxic profile of an area.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (72.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adhikari N., Grover I. S. Genotoxic effects of some systemic pesticides: in vivo chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow cells in rats. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1988;12(2):235–242. doi: 10.1002/em.2860120209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barale R., Giorgelli F., Migliore L., Ciranni R., Casini D., Zucconi D., Loprieno N. Benzene induces micronuclei in circulating erythrocytes of chronically treated mice. Mutat Res. 1985 Nov;144(3):193–196. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(85)90139-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dolara P., Torricelli F., Antonelli N. Cytogenetic effects on human lymphocytes of a mixture of fifteen pesticides commonly used in Italy. Mutat Res. 1994 Sep;325(1):47–51. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(94)90026-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FORD C. E., HAMERTON J. L. A colchicine, hypotonic citrate, squash sequence for mammalian chromosomes. Stain Technol. 1956 Nov;31(6):247–251. doi: 10.3109/10520295609113814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fitzgerald P. H., Pickering A. F., Mercer J. M., Miethke P. M. Premature centromere division: a mechanism of non-disjunction causing X chromosome aneuploidy in somatic cells of man. Ann Hum Genet. 1975 May;38(4):417–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1975.tb00631.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gollapudi B. B., McFadden L. G. Sample size for the estimation of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocyte ratio in the bone marrow micronucleus test. Mutat Res. 1995 Jul;347(2):97–99. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(95)90076-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ieradi L. A., Cristaldi M., Mascanzoni D., Cardarelli E., Grossi R., Campanella L. Genetic damage in urban mice exposed to traffic pollution. Environ Pollut. 1996;92(3):323–328. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(95)00109-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Marinovich M., Ghilardi F., Galli C. L. Effect of pesticide mixtures on in vitro nervous cells: comparison with single pesticides. Toxicology. 1996 Apr 30;108(3):201–206. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(96)03303-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Meier J. R., Wernsing P., Torsella J. Feasibility of micronucleus methods for monitoring genetic damage in two feral species of small mammals. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1999;33(3):219–225. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(1999)33:3<219::aid-em6>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mitchell I. D., Lambert T. R., Burden M., Sunderland J., Porter R. L., Carlton J. B. Is polyploidy an important genotoxic lesion? Mutagenesis. 1995 Mar;10(2):79–83. doi: 10.1093/mutage/10.2.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nakano E., Rabello-Gay M. N., Pereira C. A. Evaluation of the genotoxic potential of flumethrin in mouse bone marrow by chromosomal analysis and micronucleus test. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen. 1996;16(1):37–48. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6866(1996)16:1<37::AID-TCM5>3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Onfelt A. Mechanistic aspects on chemical induction of spindle disturbances and abnormal chromosome numbers. Mutat Res. 1986 Nov;168(3):249–300. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(86)90023-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rudd N. L., Teshima I. E., Martin R. H., Sisken J. E., Weksberg R. A dominantly inherited cytogenetic anomaly: a possible cell division mutant. Hum Genet. 1983;65(2):117–121. doi: 10.1007/BF00286646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schmid W. The micronucleus test. Mutat Res. 1975 Feb;31(1):9–15. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(75)90058-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vasudev V., Krishnamurthy N. B. In vivo cytogenetic analyses of the carbamate pesticides Dithane M-45 and Baygon in mice. Mutat Res. 1994 Mar;323(3):133–135. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(94)90087-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zelesco P. A., Barbieri I., Graves J. A. Use of a cell hybrid test system to demonstrate that benomyl induces aneuploidy and polyploidy. Mutat Res. 1990 Dec;242(4):329–335. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(90)90051-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES