Abstract
We compared 121 replicate rodent carcinogenicity assays from the two parts (National Cancer Institute/National Toxicology Program and literature) of the Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB) to estimate the reliability of these experiments. We estimated a concordance of 57% between the overall rodent carcinogenicity classifications from both sources. This value did not improve substantially when additional biologic information (species, sex, strain, target organs) was considered. These results indicate that rodent carcinogenicity assays are much less reproducible than previously expected, an effect that should be considered in the development of structure-activity relationship models and the risk assessment process.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (73.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ames B. N., Durston W. E., Yamasaki E., Lee F. D. Carcinogens are mutagens: a simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Aug;70(8):2281–2285. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.8.2281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ashby J., Tennant R. W. Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested in rodents by the U.S. NCI/NTP. Mutat Res. 1988 Jan;204(1):17–115. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(88)90114-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ashby J., Tennant R. W. Definitive relationships among chemical structure, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity for 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP. Mutat Res. 1991 May;257(3):229–306. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(91)90003-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ashby J., Tennant R. W., Zeiger E., Stasiewicz S. Classification according to chemical structure, mutagenicity to Salmonella and level of carcinogenicity of a further 42 chemicals tested for carcinogenicity by the U.S. National Toxicology Program. Mutat Res. 1989 Jun;223(2):73–103. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90037-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans J. S., Gray G. M., Sielken R. L., Jr, Smith A. E., Valdez-Flores C., Graham J. D. Use of probabilistic expert judgment in uncertainty analysis of carcinogenic potency. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1994 Aug;20(1 Pt 1):15–36. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1994.1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gold L. S., Wright C., Bernstein L., deVeciana M. Reproducibility of results in "near-replicate" carcinogenesis bioassays. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987 Jun;78(6):1149–1158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Helma C., Kramer S., Pfahringer B., Gottmann E. Data quality in predictive toxicology: identification of chemical structures and calculation of chemical properties. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Nov;108(11):1029–1033. doi: 10.1289/ehp.001081029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peto R., Pike M. C., Bernstein L., Gold L. S., Ames B. N. The TD50: a proposed general convention for the numerical description of the carcinogenic potency of chemicals in chronic-exposure animal experiments. Environ Health Perspect. 1984 Dec;58:1–8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.84581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawyer C., Peto R., Bernstein L., Pike M. C. Calculation of carcinogenic potency from long-term animal carcinogenesis experiments. Biometrics. 1984 Mar;40(1):27–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tennant R. W., Stasiewicz S., Spalding J. W. Comparison of multiple parameters of rodent carcinogenicity and in vitro genetic toxicity. Environ Mutagen. 1986;8(2):205–227. doi: 10.1002/em.2860080204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tennant R. W., Zeiger E. Genetic toxicology: current status of methods of carcinogen identification. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Apr;100:307–315. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93100307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]