Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2025 Aug 21;122(34):e2506790122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2506790122

Reduced gas accretion onto galaxies due to effects of external giant radio lobes

Yu Qiu a,b, Renyue Cen a,b,1
PMCID: PMC12403129  PMID: 40838880

Significance

Powerful radio jets released by accreting supermassive black holes are a significant source of magnetic energy in the Universe. By cosmic noon (redshift 2 to 3), the jet-inflated radio lobes extend beyond their host galaxies and inject a substantial amount of magnetic energy into the intergalactic medium. Subsequently, gas accretion onto nearby galaxies is hindered through magnetic pressure, which provides a global negative feedback mechanism. We use cosmological magneto-hydrodynamic simulations to quantify this effect and find significant reduction of gas accretion. This external active galactic nuclei (AGN) feedback process has significant bearings on galaxy formation and evolution. Accurate modeling of galaxy formation demands the incorporation of this new, external AGN feedback process.

Keywords: galaxy formation, intergalactic medium, magnetic field, radio jets, AGN feedback

Abstract

Suppression effects of giant radio lobes from supermassive black holes on gas accretion onto galaxies in the surrounding regions are quantified using cosmological magneto-hydrodynamic simulations. With an appropriate amount of radio jet energy injected into the intergalactic medium following the formation peak of supermassive black holes at redshift two, we find that galaxies in the greater neighborhood of the jet-launching massive galaxies subsequently experience a significant reduction in the amount of accreted gas. The distribution of the resulting magnetic field in the intergalactic medium is highly inhomogeneous, due to the highly biased nature of the most massive supermassive black holes. In regions with magnetic field strength B>102μG, the baryon fraction is on average reduced by 17%, 14%, and 12%, respectively, for halos of mass in the range of [1011, 1012)M, [1012, 1013)M, and [1013, 1014)M. A proper inclusion of this new, external, global, preventive feedback mechanism from active galactic nuclei (AGN) in the next generation of cosmological simulation may be necessary.


Magnetic fields are ubiquitous in and around galaxies (13), as evidenced by observations of the radio synchrotron emission (4, 5). Primordial magnetic fields generated in cosmic inflation and phase transitions (68) may be amplified by homogeneous isotropic Kolmogorov turbulence associated with gravitational structure formation of galaxies (9) or dynamo mechanism within galaxies (10).

Most cosmological simulations that involve magnetic fields either adopt a primordial “seed” field (1113), or focus on the generation of magnetic fields from galactic outflows driven by starbursts (14, 15). Recently, Cen 2024 (16) showed that the intergalactic medium (IGM) endowed with a substantial amount of magnetic energy originating from giant radio lobes, i.e., Fanaroff–Riley Class II (FR-II) jets, may be hindered from being accreted onto galaxies. The hindering effect is analogous to thermal pressure, except that the magnetic energy trapped in the gas is dissipationless and long-lived. A similar nonthermal pressure support can be provided by cosmic-ray protons (e.g., ref. 17), which may help remove baryons from galaxies (e.g., ref. 18). The expectation is that, when magnetic pressure in the accreting gas becomes comparable to the thermal pressure (or equivalently, in a virialized gas, the gravitational energy density), when approaching the virial radius of a host halo, gas will be significantly hindered from accreting onto the galaxy.

In contrast with traditional “internal” feedback models implemented in a variety of cosmological simulations (e.g., refs. 12 and 1929), this radio lobe active galactic nuclei (AGN) feedback mechanism is external, global, and preventive in nature. Because FR II jets transport magnetic energy into the low-density IGM, far away from originating host galaxies, they not only energetically contain a substantial fraction of the supermassive black hole rest mass energy, but also provide the most economical way to maximize the generation of entropy in the IGM per unit energy deposited. In this article, we use cosmological magneto-hydrodynamic simulations to quantify the impact of powerful radio jets on the accretion of baryons onto galaxies, as well as its spatial and environmental dependence.

Magneto-Hydrodynamic Simulations in a Cosmological Volume

The simulations are performed using the cosmological MHD code Enzo (30), utilizing the ideal magneto-hydrodynamics module with constrained transport (31, 32), which preserves the divergence of the magnetic field. Starting at redshift z=100, the initial conditions are generated using the code MUSIC (33). We adopt cosmological parameters from Planck 2018 results (34), i.e., a flat universe with Hubble constant H0100 h km s1Mpc1=67.4 km s1Mpc1, total nonrelativistic matter density parameter Ωm=0.3138, baryon density parameter Ωb=0.0493, power spectrum amplitude σ8=0.811, and spectral index ns=0.965.

The simulation is periodic in a box of size 20 h1 cMpc on a uniform 10243 grid. The largest cluster at z=0 in the simulation box has a halo mass Mh1014M. The resolution is designed to resolve the virial radius of Mh=1011M halos with about five cells. This allows us to probe the baryon accretion at the virial radii, without significantly increasing the computational cost to resolve the interior of halos. Increasing the resolution potentially enables the formation of more detailed magnetic and turbulent velocity structures on small scales, which can strengthen the nonthermal pressure support. Therefore, we anticipate the relatively low-resolution simulation will provide a lower limit on the baryon reduction effect. No primordial magnetic field is used in the simulations. A tabulated cooling table for the primordial gas is generated using the GRACKLE library (35). Because the typical cooling timescale at the virial radii of halos is longer than the Hubble time, cooling associated with metal species does not significantly affect the baryon accretion at halo boundaries. Therefore, we do not model metal enrichment and associated cooling in the simulations. A baryon density floor of 102ρ¯m, where ρ¯m is the mean matter density at a given redshift, and a temperature floor of 5,000 K are introduced to avoid significant slowdown of the simulation timestep. Compared to simulations with the floors removed, as well as with a six-species (i.e., ionized and neutral hydrogen and helium) nonequilibrium cooling module in GRACKLE, we have verified in low-resolution simulations that the relevant properties of the resulting halos are not affected. Analysis was performed using the yt_astro_analysis extension (36) of the yt analysis toolkit (37).

Implementation of Giant Radio Lobe Feedback

As laid out in ref. 16, the external feedback process is implemented as jet-inflated magnetic bubbles in the simulations. The cosmological volume is initially evolved magneto-hydrodynamically with a token (i.e., zero) magnetic field to z=2. A total of Nh=48 Mh>1012M halos are then located using the ROCKSTAR halo finder (38), with a total mass of ΣiMh,i1014M. The halo mass threshold (Mh>1012M) is chosen so as to identify potential hosts of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) with masses MBH>108M, whose feedback energy is substantial. The total feedback energy Efb is then calculated based on the formula:

Efb=2NhEbub=ηηBHηRηJΩbΩmΣiMh,ic2=1.6×10602Nhη0.2ηBH0.002ηR0.2ηJ0.07×Ωb/Ωm0.157ΣiMh,i1014Merg, [1]

where Ebub is the total energy of each magnetic bubble (assuming each SMBH releases a pair of bubbles), various parameters are, respectively, stellar to baryon mass ratio (η), SMBH to stellar mass ratio (ηBH), fraction of all relevant mass galaxies classified as radio loud galaxies (ηR) and the mean jet power in units of accretion power onto the SMBH in radio-loud galaxies (ηJ). Fiducial values of the parameters in the equation are chosen based on observations (see a discussion in ref. 16) and used here. In general, radio observations of FR II jets report total energy Ebub1060erg per lobe (39) under minimum energy magnetic field assumption (40), consistent with our energy modeling. While the simulation domain is initialized with B=0, in order to maintain ·B=0 after injecting feedback energy, the magnetic field in the bubble is implemented as the curl of a vector potential field, i.e., Bbub=×Abub. The initial distribution of the magnetic field in a bubble follows the Kolmogorov power spectrum. A spherical error function mask is applied to Abub, so that after taking the curl, a Gaussian smoothing is applied to Bbub to circumvent abrupt variation in magnetic field strength at the bubble surface. Based on isolated bubble expansion from an initial small radius to 1 Mpc radius, ηB3% of the initially injected magnetic energy remains in magnetic form at r=1 Mpc, with the rest having been converted into kinetic or thermal energy, i.e., Emag(r=1Mpc)=ηBEbub. The adopted radius, 1 Mpc, is on the high end of observed radio lobes (e.g., ref. 41), which represents the later, mature stage of radio lobe evolution (see, e.g., refs. 42 and 43, for the early stage inflation of the lobe from collimated jets and subsequent turbulent evolution). For lobes starting with a smaller radius, e.g., 100pkpc, it would take ∼1 Gyr, given the lobe energy and ambient gas density, to grow to 1Mpc, which closely follows the Sedov-Taylor solution based on simulations we have performed. Therefore, the results would not change significantly if we insert r100 kpc bubbles at z=3, as the bubbles will expand to 1Mpc by z=2. In order to focus the computational resources on the large-scale impact, the 96 magnetic bubbles with radius r=1Mpc are inserted in the simulation around their respective host halos at z=2. Each bubble pair is oriented randomly on opposite sides of the host halo, offset 1Mpc from the halo center. The direction of deposition affects which part of the IGM the radio lobe may interact with contemporaneously. In practice, in the protocluster environment, many pairs of jets will be deposited. Still, it may be that the volume filling fraction of all lobes may be less than 100%, even in protocluster regions, which will cause inhomogeneous feedback effects. The two scientific goals of this study are to demonstrate 1) the significance of this feedback process and 2) its spatially inhomogeneous nature. We note that this study does not address the directional nature of the lobes with respect to the jet launching host galaxy and the internal feedback effect. The bubble-inserted simulation box is restarted at z=2 running to z=0.

Suppression of Baryon Fraction in Halos by Giant Radio Lobes

Panel (A) of Fig. 1 shows the distribution of dark matter at z=0 in the simulation with giant radio lobe feedback. The magnetic field is displayed as white contours in the plot, which are seen to approximately center on the most massive Mh1014M halo in the simulation at the center of the display, due physically to the fact that jet launching massive galaxies are highly biased. To remove ambiguity in defining the virial radius of a halo, only central halos are analyzed here (i.e., excluding subhalos and halos experiencing major mergers). Three illustrative halos in the feedback run (labeled “fb”) are shown in panels (BD) of Fig. 1, spanning a wide range in halo mass and distance to the central halo in the simulation. Baryon density and temperature projections are shown for each halo, and compared with the scenario without feedback (labeled “no fb”). The baryon fractions for all halos studied in this work, fb, are shown in Fig. 3 as a function of halo mass. Due to the absence of “internal” feedback mechanisms in our study, in regions not affected by the radio lobes, the baryon fraction may be above the cosmic mean due to excessive radiative cooling (also seen in cosmological simulations with radiative cooling, e.g., ref. 44). We have verified by running simulations without radiative cooling that this above-the-cosmic-mean baryon fraction is due to radiative cooling. To isolate the baryon reduction effect from giant radio lobes, a normalized baryon fraction parameter, η, defined as the ratio of baryon fractions of the halo in the simulation with feedback to that of the corresponding halo in the simulation without feedback, is shown in white for each halo. In the three cases shown in Fig. 1, the baryon content is significantly reduced by 29% to 49%, with central magnetic field strength approaching 0.1 to 1μG. It is evident that significant external magnetic fields can substantially reduce gas accretion onto galaxies.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Top-Left panel (A) shows the projected distribution of the dark matter in the 20 cMpc/h simulation box with magnetic bubbles at z=0. Volume-weighted projected magnetic field magnitude is overlaid as white contours (log|B| in units of Gauss); the four visible contour levels are (−9.0, −8.5, −8.0, −7.5) in panel (A). Additional contours of higher magnitudes are visible in zoomed panels (BD). The three four-panel sets zoom into three separate halos that show significant baryonic mass reduction due to magnetic bubbles, with η=0.54 (B), 0.51 (C), and 0.71 (D), respectively. In each four-panel set, the Top-row of two panels show the gas density (Left panel) and temperature (Right panel) from the simulation without magnetic bubbles, indicated as “no fb.” The Bottom-row panels show the corresponding variables from the simulation with magnetic bubbles, indicated as “fb.” The cyan circles indicate the virial radius of each halo. The widths of panels (BD) are 2 Mpc, and the projection depths are three times their respective virial radius centered at the halo.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Panel (A) shows the comparison of baryon fraction fb as a function of halo mass Mh, in simulations with or without feedback. Halos not affected by feedback have fb higher than cosmic mean due to radiative cooling. The rest of the panels show the normalized baryon fraction η as a function of (B) mean density Δ, (C) volume-weighted magnetic field magnitude between (1,1.2)×rvir, and (D) β1/2 at the virial radii. Exponential fits in the form of eαβ1/2 are shown in the panel (D), which indicate that baryons are prevented from entering the halos due to magnetic pressure force.

Due to the highly biased nature of jet-launching massive galaxies, the resulting distribution of the external magnetic field in the IGM is also highly inhomogeneous. This indicates that the gas accretion suppression effect will be environmentally dependent. To assess this expected systematic trend, we show results in panels (AC) of Fig. 2 for all environments (A), regions with overdensity Δ>3 (B), and Δ>10 (C), respectively, where Δ is defined to be the total density within 1 Mpc/h of the halo center in units of the mean total density at redshift z=0. In panel (A) we see the 50%25%+25% quartiles of η for halos of mass ranges [1011,1012), [1012,1013), and [1013,1014)M, respectively, to be 1.000.06+0.01, 0.940.17+0.06, 0.830.05+0.17. In panel (B) we see the 50%25%+25% quartiles of η for halos of mass ranges [1011,1012), [1012,1013), and [1013,1014)M, respectively, to be 0.980.13+0.02, 0.940.17+0.06, 0.830.05+0.17 for halos in regions with Δ>3, while they become 0.920.33+0.08, 0.860.11+0.11, 0.830.05+0.17 for halos in regions with Δ>10 (C). A tabulated η distribution in various halo mass ranges and overdensities is given in Table 1. The increased impact on baryon reduction indicates that the “global” feedback is expected to be more pronounced in overdense regions than in underdense regions. In void regions, due to lack of massive galaxies, this feedback mechanism may be absent, which is consistent with observations that galaxies are bluest in voids at present (45).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Cumulative distribution of η in different Mh ranges in the simulation with giant radio lobe feedback at z=0 is shown in panel (A). Panels (B and C) show the distribution for halos located in regions with mean total densities (Δ=ρ¯m[<1Mpc/h], in units of cosmic mean) larger than 3 and 10, respectively. Vertical lines indicate the location of the 25%, 50%, and 75% quartiles of each distribution.

Table 1.

Tabulated distribution of η, expressed as the fraction of halos (fh) with η below a threshold

Mh [1011, 1012) M Mh [1012, 1013) M Mh [1013, 1014) M
Δ>0 Δ>3 Δ>10 Δ>0 Δ>3 Δ>10 Δ>0 Δ>3 Δ>10
fh (η<0.95) 0.27 0.39 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71
fh (η<0.90) 0.20 0.27 0.40 0.42 0.42 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57
fh (η<0.85) 0.15 0.21 0.25 0.35 0.35 0.43 0.57 0.57 0.57
fh (η<0.80) 0.12 0.17 0.25 0.27 0.27 0.43 0.29 0.29 0.29
fh (η<0.75) 0.095 0.14 0.25 0.15 0.15 0.21 0 0 0
fh (η<0.70) 0.079 0.11 0.20 0.038 0.038 0.071 0 0 0
fh (η<0.60) 0.043 0.063 0.15 0 0 0 0 0 0
fh (η<0.50) 0.012 0.014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

For each halo mass range, different columns show the fractions for halos located in different environmental overdensities Δ, defined as the mean total density within 1 Mpc/h from each halo center, in units of the cosmic mean at z=0.

In Fig. 3, we show η as a function of the overdensity within the virial radius Δ (B), the magnetic field strength at the virial radius Bvir (C) and the inverse root of the plasma beta parameter at the virial radius β1/2 (D) for each galaxy. In regions with Bvir>0.01μG, the average of η is respectively 0.83, 0.86, and 0.88, in the mass ranges [1011,1012), [1012,1013) and [1013,1014)M. Cen (16) suggested that the suppression of baryon fraction may become significant when the magnetic pressure force exceeds the gravitational force at the virial radius of a halo, or equivalently,

xvA2σv1, [2]

where vA is the Alfve´n speed of the gas at the virial radius, and σv is the 1-d velocity dispersion of all matter in the halo. Alternatively, this relation would be equivalent to the thermal-to-magnetic pressure ratio, i.e., the plasma β parameter

β1/2=PmagPth1 [3]

at the virial radius, if the gas sound speed is equal to the halo velocity dispersion. Given the widespread use of β involving magnetic energy in many applications, we will adopt β1/2 instead of x. The physics underpinning the gas accretion suppression is seen to be borne out in panel (D) of Fig. 3, where η begins to decline when β1/20.1. For the lowest halo mass bin examined [1011,1012)M, it is seen that this approximately corresponds to a magnetic field at the virial radius of about Bvir0.01μG (C). Least-square fits to the three halo mass bins, in the form of eαβ1/2, are shown as three curves. We see that, at a given x, the gas suppression effects are stronger for higher mass halos. This is in a large part due to the fact that higher mass halos accrete fractionally more mass than lower mass halos since the injection of magnetic bubbles in the simulation at z=2. Because the magnetic pressure induced suppression effects are external in nature, already accreted gas in halos is not much affected. For example, some low mass halos have Bvir>0.1μG, but with η>0.9. These halos either already have assembled most of their final masses before z=2, i.e., before radio lobes are implemented, or have cosmic filament orientation aligned with the magnetic field direction, which enables continued supply of baryons into the galaxy via filaments without hindrance from the magnetic pressure force. Needless to say, the gas suppression effects due to this mechanism and associated effects on star formation and others are complex. Detailed simulations that include this feedback process and other traditional internal feedback processes are likely to operate in a complex, intertwined, probably synergistic fashion.

In conclusion, in this article, we use cosmological magneto-hydrodynamic simulations to quantify the impact giant radio lobes have on the accretion of gas onto galaxies in the greater neighborhood. The radio lobes are modeled as magnetic energy injection in the form of megaparsec-scale giant bubbles, which are matched with observational constraints in both bubble size and energetics, at cosmic noon (z=2). We show that, due to the highly biased nature of radio-lobe launching massive galaxies, the effects on gas accretion onto galaxies are strongly environment dependent. Even in the same environment, such as parameterized by the matter overdensity at certain large scale, the effects are variable. Furthermore, when gauged by the ratio of the plasma beta parameter at the virial radius of the halo, the effects on the overall gas suppression are also varied, which may be due in part to the various halo assembly histories since the injection of the radio bubbles at z=2 and in part to complex magnetic pressure dynamics (such as orientation of the field to the orientation of the gas-feeding cosmic filaments, etc). Nonetheless, we find an expected, strong trend that the gas suppression effect increases with the inverse root of the plasma beta parameter at the virial radius of the halo (Fig. 3). Our analysis demonstrates that magnetic fields seeded by relativistic jets are capable of significantly impacting the gas accretion of nearby galaxies. It is worth noting that some feedback strengths for internal AGN feedback implemented in current cosmological galaxy formation simulations may be too large to be concordant with the observed AGN feedback (e.g., outflow kinetic luminosity in ref. 46). The external, radio-lobe generated AGN feedback, combined with a more realistic internal AGN feedback model, may improve the physical realism of the AGN feedback energetics in simulations, as well as possess the potential for better matching observations. Future observations that probe the magnetic universe, such as from the Square Kilometer Array (SKA; ref. 47), will be able help elucidate the impact of magnetic fields on the accretion of baryons onto galaxies in two ways. First, a larger population of high-redshift sources with rotation measures (RM) will greatly help probe the magnetic field in protoclusters. Second, the high sensitivities of SKA may be able to directly detect synchrotron radiation of radio lobes at high redshift, as recent detection of synchrotron radiation of z=0.9 radio jets indicates (48). We argue for inclusion of this new, global feedback process in the next generation of cosmological simulations.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China and the Zhejiang provincial top level research support program. The simulations and analysis presented in this article were carried out on the SilkRiver Supercomputer of Zhejiang University. We thank the High Performance Computing Platform at Zhejiang Lab, where part of the simulation modules were developed. Analysis was performed using the yt_astro_analysis extension (36) of the yt analysis toolkit (37).

Author contributions

R.C. designed research; Y.Q. performed research; R.C. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; Y.Q. analyzed data; and Y.Q. and R.C. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors disclose startup funds at Zhejiang University.

Footnotes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Data, Materials, and Software Availability

All study data are included in the main text.

References

  • 1.Grasso D., Rubinstein H. R., Magnetic fields in the early Universe. Phys. Rep. 348, 163–266 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Govoni F., Feretti L., Magnetic fields in clusters of galaxies. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 13, 1549–1594 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beck R., Magnetic fields in spiral galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 24, 4 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Feretti L., Giovannini G., Govoni F., Murgia M., Clusters of galaxies: Observational properties of the diffuse radio emission. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 20, 54 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Han J. L., Observing interstellar and intergalactic magnetic fields. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 55, 111–157 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ratra B., Cosmological “seed” magnetic field from inflation. Astrophys. J. Lett. 391, L1 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Durrer R., Neronov A., Cosmological magnetic fields: Their generation, evolution and observation. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 62 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Subramanian K., The origin, evolution and signatures of primordial magnetic fields. Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 076901 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kulsrud R. M., Cen R., Ostriker J. P., Ryu D., The protogalactic origin for cosmic magnetic fields. Astrophys. J. 480, 481 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brandenburg A., Subramanian K., Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory. Phys. Rep. 417, 1–209 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vazza F., Brüggen M., Gheller C., Wang P., On the amplification of magnetic fields in cosmic filaments and galaxy clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 3706–3722 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Springel V., et al. , First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: Matter and galaxy clustering. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 676–698 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Katz H., et al. , Introducing SPHINX-MHD: The impact of primordial magnetic fields on the first galaxies, reionization, and the global 21-cm signal. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 507, 1254–1282 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bertone S., Vogt C., Enßlin T., Magnetic field seeding by galactic winds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 370, 319–330 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Donnert J., Dolag K., Lesch H., Müller E., Cluster magnetic fields from galactic outflows. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 392, 1008–1021 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cen R., Global preventive feedback of powerful radio jets on galaxy formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 121, e2402435121 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ruszkowski M., Pfrommer C., Cosmic ray feedback in galaxies and galaxy clusters. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 31, 4 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Quataert E., Hopkins P. F., Cosmic ray feedback in massive halos: Implications for the distribution of baryons. Open J. Astrophys. 8, 66 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vogelsberger M., et al. , Introducing the Illustris project: Simulating the coevolution of dark and visible matter in the Universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 444, 1518–1547 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Genel S., et al. , Introducing the Illustris project: The evolution of galaxy populations across cosmic time. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 175–200 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schaye J., et al. , The EAGLE project: Simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 446, 521–554 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Crain R. A., et al. , The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: Calibration of subgrid physics and model variations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, 1937–1961 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schaller M., et al. , Baryon effects on the internal structure of ΛCDM haloes in the EAGLE simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 1247–1267 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Trayford J. W., et al. , Colours and luminosities of z = 0.1 galaxies in the EAGLE simulation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 452, 2879–2896 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McAlpine S., et al. , The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: Public release of halo and galaxy catalogues. Astron. Comput. 15, 72–89 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pillepich A., et al. , Simulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 4077–4106 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nelson D., et al. , First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: The galaxy colour bimodality. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 624–647 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Davé R., et al. , SIMBA: Cosmological simulations with black hole growth and feedback. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 2827–2849 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sorini D., Davé R., Cui W., Appleby S., How baryons affect haloes and large-scale structure: A unified picture from the SIMBA simulation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 516, 883–906 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bryan G. L., et al. , ENZO: An adaptive mesh refinement code for astrophysics. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 211, 19 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li S., Li H., Cen R., CosmoMHD: A cosmological magnetohydrodynamics code. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 174, 1–12 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Collins D. C., Xu H., Norman M. L., Li H., Li S., Cosmological adaptive mesh refinement magnetohydrodynamics with Enzo. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 186, 308–333 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hahn O., Abel T., Multi-scale initial conditions for cosmological simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 415, 2101–2121 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Collaboration Planck, et al. , Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Smith B. D., et al. , GRACKLE: A chemistry and cooling library for astrophysics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 466, 2217–2234 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.B. Smith et al. , yt-project/yt_astro_analysis: yt_astro_analysis version 1.1.1 is released! Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.5911048. Accessed 7 March 2025. [DOI]
  • 37.Turk M. J., et al. , yt: A multi-code analysis toolkit for astrophysical simulation data. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192, 9 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Behroozi P. S., Wechsler R. H., Wu H. Y., The ROCKSTAR phase-space temporal halo finder and the velocity offsets of cluster cores. Astrophys. J. 762, 109 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.O’Dea C. P., Daly R. A., Kharb P., Freeman K. A., Baum S. A., Physical properties of very powerful FRII radio galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 494, 471–488 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Miley G., The structure of extended extragalactic radio sources. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 18, 165–218 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hardcastle M. J., Worrall D. M., The environments of FRII radio sources. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 319, 562–572 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tchekhovskoy A., Bromberg O., Three-dimensional relativistic MHD simulations of active galactic nuclei jets: Magnetic kink instability and Fanaroff-Riley dichotomy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, L46–L50 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vazza F., Wittor D., Brunetti G., Brüggen M., Simulating the transport of relativistic electrons and magnetic fields injected by radio galaxies in the intracluster medium. Astron. Astrophys. 653, A23 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kravtsov A. V., Nagai D., Vikhlinin A. A., Effects of cooling and star formation on the baryon fractions in clusters. Astrophys. J. 625, 588–598 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rojas R. R., Vogeley M. S., Hoyle F., Brinkmann J., Photometric properties of void galaxies in the Sloan digital sky survey. Astrophys. J. 617, 50–63 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Molina J., et al. , Ionized outflows in nearby quasars are poorly coupled to their host galaxies. Astrophys. J. 935, 72 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Heald G., et al. , Magnetism science with the square kilometre array. Galaxies 8, 53 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Oei M. S. S. L., et al. , Black hole jets on the scale of the cosmic web. Nature 633, 537–541 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All study data are included in the main text.


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES