Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2001 Jun;109(6):551–556. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109551

Residential water source and the risk of childhood brain tumors.

B A Mueller 1, K Newton 1, E A Holly 1, S Preston-Martin 1
PMCID: PMC1240334  PMID: 11445506

Abstract

Gestation may represent a window of susceptibility to transplacental effects of environmental exposures, including chemicals in water. The N-nitroso compounds (NNC), a class of chemicals with demonstrated neurocarcinogenic potential, include substances detected in drinking water. We used data from a study of possible risk factors for childhood brain tumors (CBT) to investigate the association of source of residential drinking water during pregnancy and CBT occurrence among offspring. In addition, dipstick measurements were made of nitrates and nitrites in tap water for the subset of women living in the same home they had lived in during their pregnancies. Population-based CBT cases (n = 540) and controls (n = 801) were identified in three regions including Los Angeles County, and the San Francisco Bay Area of California, and the Seattle-Puget Sound area of western Washington state. Overall, we observed no increased risk of CBT in offspring associated with wells as the source of residential water. However, an increased risk of CBT [odds ratio (OR) = 2.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), = 1.3-5.2] was observed in western Washington among offspring of women who relied exclusively on well water, and a decreased risk of CBT (OR = 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8) was observed in Los Angeles County. Among the small subset of subjects for whom dipstick measurements of tap water were available, the risk of CBT associated with the presence of either measurable nitrite and/or nitrate was 1.1 (95% CI, 0.7-2.0). Given the crude measurement method employed and because measurements often were obtained years after these pregnancies occurred, the relevance of the dipstick findings is unclear. The lack of consistency in our findings related to residential water source does not support the hypothesis of increased risk related to consumption of well water; however, regional differences in well water content may exist, and the increased risk observed in western Washington deserves further evaluation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (70.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrett J. H., Parslow R. C., McKinney P. A., Law G. R., Forman D. Nitrate in drinking water and the incidence of gastric, esophageal, and brain cancer in Yorkshire, England. Cancer Causes Control. 1998 Mar;9(2):153–159. doi: 10.1023/a:1008878126535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bunin G. R., Kuijten R. R., Boesel C. P., Buckley J. D., Meadows A. T. Maternal diet and risk of astrocytic glioma in children: a report from the Childrens Cancer Group (United States and Canada) Cancer Causes Control. 1994 Mar;5(2):177–187. doi: 10.1007/BF01830264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chilvers C., Inskip H., Caygill C., Bartholomew B., Fraser P., Hill M. A survey of dietary nitrate in well-water users. Int J Epidemiol. 1984 Sep;13(3):324–331. doi: 10.1093/ije/13.3.324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Correa P. A human model of gastric carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1988 Jul 1;48(13):3554–3560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harris C. C. Biochemical and molecular effects of N-nitroso compounds in human cultured cells: an overview. IARC Sci Publ. 1987;(84):20–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hartge P., Brinton L. A., Rosenthal J. F., Cahill J. I., Hoover R. N., Waksberg J. Random digit dialing in selecting a population-based control group. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Dec;120(6):825–833. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson C. J., Kross B. C. Continuing importance of nitrate contamination of groundwater and wells in rural areas. Am J Ind Med. 1990;18(4):449–456. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700180416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Krokan H., Haugen A., Myrnes B., Guddal P. H. Repair of premutagenic DNA lesions in human fetal tissues: evidence for low levels of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and uracil-DNA glycosylase activity in some tissues. Carcinogenesis. 1983 Dec;4(12):1559–1564. doi: 10.1093/carcin/4.12.1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kross B. C., Hallberg G. R., Bruner D. R., Cherryholmes K., Johnson J. K. The nitrate contamination of private well water in Iowa. Am J Public Health. 1993 Feb;83(2):270–272. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.2.270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Leaf C. D., Wishnok J. S., Tannenbaum S. R. Mechanisms of endogenous nitrosation. Cancer Surv. 1989;8(2):323–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lele C., Holly E. A., Roseman D. S., Thomas D. B. Comparison of control subjects recruited by random digit dialing and area survey. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Oct 1;140(7):643–648. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Macilwain C. US report raises fears over nitrate levels in water. Nature. 1995 Sep 7;377(6544):4–4. doi: 10.1038/377004a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Møller H., Landt J., Jensen P., Pedersen E., Autrup H., Jensen O. M. Nitrate exposure from drinking water and diet in a Danish rural population. Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Mar;18(1):206–212. doi: 10.1093/ije/18.1.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Norman M. A., Holly E. A., Ahn D. K., Preston-Martin S., Mueller B. A., Bracci P. M. Prenatal exposure to tobacco smoke and childhood brain tumors: results from the United States West Coast childhood brain tumor study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 Feb;5(2):127–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Preston-Martin S., Pogoda J. M., Mueller B. A., Holly E. A., Lijinsky W., Davis R. L. Maternal consumption of cured meats and vitamins in relation to pediatric brain tumors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 Aug;5(8):599–605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rice J. M., Ward J. M. Age dependence of susceptibility to carcinogenesis in the nervous system. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1982;381:274–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1982.tb50392.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sarasua S., Savitz D. A. Cured and broiled meat consumption in relation to childhood cancer: Denver, Colorado (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 1994 Mar;5(2):141–148. doi: 10.1007/BF01830260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Steindorf K., Schlehofer B., Becher H., Hornig G., Wahrendorf J. Nitrate in drinking water. A case-control study on primary brain tumours with an embedded drinking water survey in Germany. Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Jun;23(3):451–457. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.3.451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Steinmetz K. A., Potter J. D. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. I. Epidemiology. Cancer Causes Control. 1991 Sep;2(5):325–357. doi: 10.1007/BF00051672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tomatis L., Ponomarkov V., Turusov V. Effects of ethylnitrosourea administration during pregnancy on three subsequent generations of BDVI Rats. Int J Cancer. 1977 Feb 15;19(2):240–248. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910190214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tsezou A., Kitsiou-Tzeli S., Galla A., Gourgiotis D., Papageorgiou J., Mitrou S., Molybdas P. A., Sinaniotis C. High nitrate content in drinking water: cytogenetic effects in exposed children. Arch Environ Health. 1996 Nov-Dec;51(6):458–461. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1996.9936046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. van Maanen J. M., Welle I. J., Hageman G., Dallinga J. W., Mertens P. L., Kleinjans J. C. Nitrate contamination of drinking water: relationship with HPRT variant frequency in lymphocyte DNA and urinary excretion of N-nitrosamines. Environ Health Perspect. 1996 May;104(5):522–528. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES